CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeals Decisions - April 2018

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, April 27, 2018

 Pruitt v. State 16-0956

 

 

Pruitt pleaded guilty to two counts of committing a sex act with a student, violations of § 13A-6-81, and two counts of distributing obscene material to a minor, violations of § 13A-12-200.5. These offenses involved 3 students Pruitt formerly taught. Pruitt was a teacher in the Blount County School system. She taught at the Locust Fork High School during the 2012-13 and 2013-14 school years. She taught the three students during this time. Beginning in the 2014-15 school year, Pruitt was transferred to Appalachian High School. During October 2014, she sent Student #1 nude Snapchat pictures, had deviate sexual intercourse with Student #2, and had sexual intercourse with Student #3. For all intents and purposes, the acts were consensual. These facts were stipulated by both sides. Prior to pleading guilty, Pruitt, relying on Lawrence v. Texas, argued that the statutes and charges were unconstitutional as applied to her. AFFIRMED The Court of Criminal Appeals rejected the Lawrence-based argument on the grounds that Lawrence explicitly held that the decision didn’t apply to conduct involving minors. Further, the Court concluded that the State has a legitimate state interest in “prohibiting intimate contact between a teacher and a student.” The Court likewise rejected Pruitt’s “consent” defense since the statute expressly says “consent is not a defense.” Finally, the Court held that the fact that Pruitt did not teach at the same school as the students did not entitle her to relief. The Court also rejected an argument that her violation for unlawful distribution of obscene material to a minor didn’t violate her right to Equal Protection to be free from State intervention in a private relationship with a consulting person. The Court ruled against this argument based on the student being a minor (per § 13A-12-200.1) and previous holdings that the State doesn’t violate Equal Protection concerns by prohibiting sexual contact with minors.
 
Towles v. State CR-15-0699
Towles was convicted of capital murder pursuant to §13A-5-40(a)(15) for killing his girlfriend’s son by hitting him on the buttocks with a piece of lumber. This appealed stemmed from a re-trial after the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed his capital murder conviction and death sentence years back. In the interim, Towles’ girlfriend pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. The girlfriend didn’t testify at trial. Towles’ defense was that she caused the death and then blackmailed him to help her cover up the child’s death. However, the State impeached Towles by discussing how she had pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. REVERSED The Court concluded that the introduction of the girlfriend’s conviction into evidence was improper evidence of Towles’ guilt. The Court also concluded that the trial court’s instruction that “knowledge of the probability of death or great bodily harm is sufficient to constitute murder” impermissibly lessened the State’s burden and undermined the defense’s argument that the killing was, at most, unintentional. Mr. Towles will now go back for his third trial.

 

Betton v. State CR-15-1501
Betton was a juvenile capital defendant seeking re-sentencing under Miller v. Alabama. Here, the circuit court re-sentenced him to LWOP without considering the factors the Alabama Supreme Court announced in Ex parte Henderson. REMANDED The Court held that remand was necessary for the circuit court to enter specific findings under Ex parte Henderson.
 
Battles v. State CR-17-0044
In a prosecution for unlawful possession of a pistol by a forbidden person pursuant to § 13A-11-72(a), Battles waived counsel and represented himself at trial. However, throughout, Battles complained that he didn’t understand the charges against him and complained that he didn’t have the resources necessary to defend his case. REVERSED The Court concluded that while Battles knowingly waived his right to represent himself at trial, the circuit court failed to the factors a court must discuss with a defendant pursuant to Fitzpatrick v. Wainwright, 800 F. 2d 1057 (11th Cir. 1986) and Tomlin v. State, 601 So. 2d 124 (Ala. 1991). Additionally, the court failed to tell Battles he could withdraw the waiver at any time.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

christian guitierez lamar county home repair fraud Alonzo Ephraim Kay Ivey fraud Jefferson County Alabama Fentanyl mobile alabama lauderdale county alabama alabama criminal law roundup Tommy Arthur brady v maryland OJ Simpson Made in America alabama law enforcement agency eleventh circuit ruling alabama beylund v north dakota Kareem Dacar Gaymon texas theft brookside alabama south carolina netflix drug possession, LWOP arson ex parte briseno bernard v north dakota jerry bohannon npr Rule 32 brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix department of justice operation crackdown illegal gun carry florence alabama aiding and abetting criminal justice reform, mountain brook alabama underage drinking russell calhoun domestic violence maryland court of special appeals terell corey mcmullin West Alabama the mannequin challenge pruitt v state criminal justice fake kidnapping, baltimore city circuit court fort payne alabama road rage Sardis Alabama domestic abuse mcwilliams v dunn aziz sayyed campbell v state hall v florida constitutional law, strickland v washington robberies stanley brent chapman operation bullseye springville alabama keith v state forced isolation endangerment of a child utah v strieff warrantless blood draws hanceville alabama breaking and entering Wesley Adam Whitworth apprendi v new jersey bessemer alabama criminal mischief drug crimes blount county alabama mike gilotti § 13A-3-23 legende v state Hillary Clinton, New York Times birmingham alabama fultondale alabama birchfield v north dakota court of criminal appeals moore v texas talladega superspeedway illegal gambling abuse armed robbery ring v arizona Etowah County Alabama, state of alabama homicide steve avery negligent homicide decatur alabama madison alabama Marengo County Alabama debit card skimming scams capital murder warrior alabama Dylann Roof morgan county alabama battles v state embezzlement huntsville alabama parole greene county alabama Xavier Beasley attempted murder nathan woods OJ Simpson pelham alabama midazolam pell city alabama US Supreme Court Update blountsville alabama state of arizona nicholas hawkins burglary kimberly alabama Alabaster alabama narcotics investigation bailey v us avondale alabama Easter death penalty, levins v state kidnapping Samuel Alito banville v state brendan dassey 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Justice Sotomayor felony assaults making a murderer Thomas Hardiman Donald Trump, hoover alabama capital punishment car accident smith v state stoves v state murder asia mcclain court systems, animal cruelty trussville alabama sixth amendment church robberies fraudulent checks brian fredick lucas § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing SCOTUS, mount olive alabama shooting Shonda Walker, shelby county lethal injection baldwin county alabama Walker County Alabama adnan syed, economic growth eighth amendment, christmas shooting alabama supreme court anniston alabama, abandonment Gardendale Alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama foley alabama social media second amendment bomb threat oneonta alabama boaz alabama editorial mccalla alabama judicial override fourth amendment assault clarence thomas heflin alabama cullman alabama Malone v State death penalty Briarwood Presbyterian Church peyton pruitt st clair county alabama sarah koenig street racing drug seizure eric sterling habeas corpus relief gadsden alabama montgomery alabama scotus gun rights hurst v florida CCA update limestone county alabama crime of passion gun control mulga alabama prostitution sting shooting death Tracie Todd Guy Terrell Junior Adamsville alabama Stephen Breyer marion county pinson alabama tarrant alabama dothan alabama department of justice, calhoun county alabama William Pryor tuscaloosa alabama sheffield v state adger alabama drug busts Lucky D Arcade constitutional violations unlawful manufacturing public assistance fraud abduction 2016 election, fairfield alabama, john earle redfearn IV v state theft of property debtor prison towles v state huntsville alfonso morris court of criminal appeal releases moving violations minor offenses homicide rate heritage christian university implied consent identity theft ake v oklahoma drug smuggling sentencing law and policy blog summaries albertville alabama hurst mandamus dekalb county alabama capital offenses executions betton v state hoax destructive devices concealed carry eugene lee jones v state Woods v State kenneth eugene billups morris alabama drug trafficking, Glaze v State shoplifting lethal injection drugs edwards v arizona rainbow city alabama benjamin todd acton ferguson missouri Mike Hubbard Benn v State self defense Eutaw Alabama drug activity Joshua Reese Ingmire v State cherokee county alabama serial Neil Gorsuch sexual assault dora alabama utah supreme court

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.