CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeals Decisions - April 2018

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, April 27, 2018

 Pruitt v. State 16-0956

 

 

Pruitt pleaded guilty to two counts of committing a sex act with a student, violations of § 13A-6-81, and two counts of distributing obscene material to a minor, violations of § 13A-12-200.5. These offenses involved 3 students Pruitt formerly taught. Pruitt was a teacher in the Blount County School system. She taught at the Locust Fork High School during the 2012-13 and 2013-14 school years. She taught the three students during this time. Beginning in the 2014-15 school year, Pruitt was transferred to Appalachian High School. During October 2014, she sent Student #1 nude Snapchat pictures, had deviate sexual intercourse with Student #2, and had sexual intercourse with Student #3. For all intents and purposes, the acts were consensual. These facts were stipulated by both sides. Prior to pleading guilty, Pruitt, relying on Lawrence v. Texas, argued that the statutes and charges were unconstitutional as applied to her. AFFIRMED The Court of Criminal Appeals rejected the Lawrence-based argument on the grounds that Lawrence explicitly held that the decision didn’t apply to conduct involving minors. Further, the Court concluded that the State has a legitimate state interest in “prohibiting intimate contact between a teacher and a student.” The Court likewise rejected Pruitt’s “consent” defense since the statute expressly says “consent is not a defense.” Finally, the Court held that the fact that Pruitt did not teach at the same school as the students did not entitle her to relief. The Court also rejected an argument that her violation for unlawful distribution of obscene material to a minor didn’t violate her right to Equal Protection to be free from State intervention in a private relationship with a consulting person. The Court ruled against this argument based on the student being a minor (per § 13A-12-200.1) and previous holdings that the State doesn’t violate Equal Protection concerns by prohibiting sexual contact with minors.
 
Towles v. State CR-15-0699
Towles was convicted of capital murder pursuant to §13A-5-40(a)(15) for killing his girlfriend’s son by hitting him on the buttocks with a piece of lumber. This appealed stemmed from a re-trial after the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed his capital murder conviction and death sentence years back. In the interim, Towles’ girlfriend pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. The girlfriend didn’t testify at trial. Towles’ defense was that she caused the death and then blackmailed him to help her cover up the child’s death. However, the State impeached Towles by discussing how she had pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. REVERSED The Court concluded that the introduction of the girlfriend’s conviction into evidence was improper evidence of Towles’ guilt. The Court also concluded that the trial court’s instruction that “knowledge of the probability of death or great bodily harm is sufficient to constitute murder” impermissibly lessened the State’s burden and undermined the defense’s argument that the killing was, at most, unintentional. Mr. Towles will now go back for his third trial.

 

Betton v. State CR-15-1501
Betton was a juvenile capital defendant seeking re-sentencing under Miller v. Alabama. Here, the circuit court re-sentenced him to LWOP without considering the factors the Alabama Supreme Court announced in Ex parte Henderson. REMANDED The Court held that remand was necessary for the circuit court to enter specific findings under Ex parte Henderson.
 
Battles v. State CR-17-0044
In a prosecution for unlawful possession of a pistol by a forbidden person pursuant to § 13A-11-72(a), Battles waived counsel and represented himself at trial. However, throughout, Battles complained that he didn’t understand the charges against him and complained that he didn’t have the resources necessary to defend his case. REVERSED The Court concluded that while Battles knowingly waived his right to represent himself at trial, the circuit court failed to the factors a court must discuss with a defendant pursuant to Fitzpatrick v. Wainwright, 800 F. 2d 1057 (11th Cir. 1986) and Tomlin v. State, 601 So. 2d 124 (Ala. 1991). Additionally, the court failed to tell Battles he could withdraw the waiver at any time.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

Walker County Alabama Joshua Reese Alonzo Ephraim boaz alabama eugene lee jones v state homicide rate npr battles v state forced isolation habeas corpus relief pelham alabama edwards v arizona public assistance fraud fultondale alabama eighth amendment, street racing Wesley Adam Whitworth heflin alabama dora alabama criminal mischief Easter tarrant alabama Eutaw Alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 beylund v north dakota theft Malone v State abduction illegal gun carry social media lauderdale county alabama Neil Gorsuch executions operation crackdown US Supreme Court Update foley alabama avondale alabama operation bullseye kimberly alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church pruitt v state road rage albertville alabama fourth amendment drug activity hurst mandamus shoplifting criminal justice utah supreme court Xavier Beasley gadsden alabama terell corey mcmullin dothan alabama utah v strieff Woods v State parole betton v state bernard v north dakota anniston alabama, towles v state felony assaults Lucky D Arcade mulga alabama kidnapping constitutional law, midazolam clarence thomas aziz sayyed robberies Mike Hubbard implied consent drug busts kenneth eugene billups marion county editorial Stephen Breyer shelby county bessemer alabama negligent homicide making a murderer bomb threat eric sterling lamar county abandonment Hillary Clinton, hurst v florida capital murder nicholas hawkins asia mcclain christian guitierez § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing springville alabama blountsville alabama assault capital punishment drug trafficking, hall v florida constitutional violations car accident New York Times murder adger alabama Dylann Roof debit card skimming scams hoover alabama § 13A-3-23 greene county alabama CCA update Shonda Walker, st clair county alabama crime of passion legende v state mcwilliams v dunn Ingmire v State Guy Terrell Junior state of arizona nathan woods moving violations cullman alabama Rule 32 mobile alabama Fentanyl oneonta alabama jerry bohannon adnan syed, Etowah County Alabama, decatur alabama serial endangerment of a child illegal gambling russell calhoun debtor prison self defense criminal justice reform, Benn v State 2016 election, Pleasant Grove Alabama montgomery alabama alabama supreme court brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix death penalty morris alabama attempted murder court systems, texas mccalla alabama Alabaster alabama alabama law enforcement agency Jefferson County Alabama court of criminal appeals sarah koenig Kay Ivey warrantless blood draws Tommy Arthur john earle redfearn IV v state lethal injection drugs OJ Simpson Made in America shooting death fort payne alabama drug possession, Kareem Dacar Gaymon ring v arizona court of criminal appeal releases smith v state drug seizure heritage christian university aiding and abetting birmingham alabama pinson alabama brady v maryland fake kidnapping, moore v texas alfonso morris campbell v state sixth amendment economic growth baltimore city circuit court sentencing law and policy blog summaries Gardendale Alabama identity theft domestic abuse narcotics investigation breaking and entering dekalb county alabama lethal injection banville v state talladega superspeedway abuse eleventh circuit ruling arson Glaze v State brookside alabama alabama florence alabama hoax destructive devices levins v state drug crimes strickland v washington sexual assault Adamsville alabama ex parte briseno unlawful manufacturing mike gilotti Justice Sotomayor alabama criminal law roundup OJ Simpson brian fredick lucas underage drinking home repair fraud trussville alabama capital offenses blount county alabama shooting fraudulent checks bailey v us south carolina apprendi v new jersey peyton pruitt scotus minor offenses sheffield v state department of justice, state of alabama domestic violence judicial override huntsville alabama baldwin county alabama gun control mount olive alabama calhoun county alabama fairfield alabama, keith v state SCOTUS, Sardis Alabama the mannequin challenge hanceville alabama fraud embezzlement drug smuggling Donald Trump, huntsville burglary Thomas Hardiman christmas shooting morgan county alabama LWOP birchfield v north dakota maryland court of special appeals armed robbery gun rights warrior alabama concealed carry church robberies second amendment benjamin todd acton department of justice ake v oklahoma mountain brook alabama death penalty, prostitution sting West Alabama Marengo County Alabama theft of property limestone county alabama netflix brendan dassey ferguson missouri madison alabama stanley brent chapman animal cruelty stoves v state cherokee county alabama pell city alabama homicide steve avery tuscaloosa alabama Samuel Alito Tracie Todd rainbow city alabama William Pryor

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.