CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeals Decisions - April 2018

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, April 27, 2018

 Pruitt v. State 16-0956

 

 

Pruitt pleaded guilty to two counts of committing a sex act with a student, violations of § 13A-6-81, and two counts of distributing obscene material to a minor, violations of § 13A-12-200.5. These offenses involved 3 students Pruitt formerly taught. Pruitt was a teacher in the Blount County School system. She taught at the Locust Fork High School during the 2012-13 and 2013-14 school years. She taught the three students during this time. Beginning in the 2014-15 school year, Pruitt was transferred to Appalachian High School. During October 2014, she sent Student #1 nude Snapchat pictures, had deviate sexual intercourse with Student #2, and had sexual intercourse with Student #3. For all intents and purposes, the acts were consensual. These facts were stipulated by both sides. Prior to pleading guilty, Pruitt, relying on Lawrence v. Texas, argued that the statutes and charges were unconstitutional as applied to her. AFFIRMED The Court of Criminal Appeals rejected the Lawrence-based argument on the grounds that Lawrence explicitly held that the decision didn’t apply to conduct involving minors. Further, the Court concluded that the State has a legitimate state interest in “prohibiting intimate contact between a teacher and a student.” The Court likewise rejected Pruitt’s “consent” defense since the statute expressly says “consent is not a defense.” Finally, the Court held that the fact that Pruitt did not teach at the same school as the students did not entitle her to relief. The Court also rejected an argument that her violation for unlawful distribution of obscene material to a minor didn’t violate her right to Equal Protection to be free from State intervention in a private relationship with a consulting person. The Court ruled against this argument based on the student being a minor (per § 13A-12-200.1) and previous holdings that the State doesn’t violate Equal Protection concerns by prohibiting sexual contact with minors.
 
Towles v. State CR-15-0699
Towles was convicted of capital murder pursuant to §13A-5-40(a)(15) for killing his girlfriend’s son by hitting him on the buttocks with a piece of lumber. This appealed stemmed from a re-trial after the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed his capital murder conviction and death sentence years back. In the interim, Towles’ girlfriend pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. The girlfriend didn’t testify at trial. Towles’ defense was that she caused the death and then blackmailed him to help her cover up the child’s death. However, the State impeached Towles by discussing how she had pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. REVERSED The Court concluded that the introduction of the girlfriend’s conviction into evidence was improper evidence of Towles’ guilt. The Court also concluded that the trial court’s instruction that “knowledge of the probability of death or great bodily harm is sufficient to constitute murder” impermissibly lessened the State’s burden and undermined the defense’s argument that the killing was, at most, unintentional. Mr. Towles will now go back for his third trial.

 

Betton v. State CR-15-1501
Betton was a juvenile capital defendant seeking re-sentencing under Miller v. Alabama. Here, the circuit court re-sentenced him to LWOP without considering the factors the Alabama Supreme Court announced in Ex parte Henderson. REMANDED The Court held that remand was necessary for the circuit court to enter specific findings under Ex parte Henderson.
 
Battles v. State CR-17-0044
In a prosecution for unlawful possession of a pistol by a forbidden person pursuant to § 13A-11-72(a), Battles waived counsel and represented himself at trial. However, throughout, Battles complained that he didn’t understand the charges against him and complained that he didn’t have the resources necessary to defend his case. REVERSED The Court concluded that while Battles knowingly waived his right to represent himself at trial, the circuit court failed to the factors a court must discuss with a defendant pursuant to Fitzpatrick v. Wainwright, 800 F. 2d 1057 (11th Cir. 1986) and Tomlin v. State, 601 So. 2d 124 (Ala. 1991). Additionally, the court failed to tell Battles he could withdraw the waiver at any time.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

anniston alabama, identity theft OJ Simpson Made in America pruitt v state murder alfonso morris kenneth eugene billups christmas shooting animal cruelty lethal injection car accident OJ Simpson sheffield v state alabama law enforcement agency Thomas Hardiman constitutional law, concealed carry robberies texas home repair fraud judicial override debit card skimming scams forced isolation abduction felony assaults attempted murder jerry bohannon brendan dassey calhoun county alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church warrantless blood draws editorial tarrant alabama lamar county social media netflix mount olive alabama homicide mulga alabama fake kidnapping, domestic abuse implied consent cullman alabama Marengo County Alabama debtor prison operation crackdown Woods v State ferguson missouri albertville alabama hoover alabama moore v texas south carolina endangerment of a child minor offenses domestic violence state of arizona st clair county alabama Alonzo Ephraim Ingmire v State scotus mobile alabama blount county alabama pelham alabama Lucky D Arcade stanley brent chapman midazolam mike gilotti ring v arizona florence alabama bessemer alabama stoves v state making a murderer brian fredick lucas 28 U.S.C. § 2254 kidnapping lauderdale county alabama pinson alabama greene county alabama betton v state Jefferson County Alabama legende v state oneonta alabama constitutional violations Walker County Alabama capital murder eric sterling Justice Sotomayor kimberly alabama street racing capital punishment morris alabama strickland v washington operation bullseye mountain brook alabama LWOP Hillary Clinton, Adamsville alabama fairfield alabama, npr huntsville alabama alabama criminal law roundup church robberies executions eighth amendment, mccalla alabama Joshua Reese public assistance fraud marion county boaz alabama fourth amendment Donald Trump, birchfield v north dakota steve avery crime of passion court systems, Glaze v State § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing moving violations keith v state negligent homicide William Pryor illegal gun carry homicide rate limestone county alabama baldwin county alabama bernard v north dakota unlawful manufacturing hall v florida hanceville alabama rainbow city alabama SCOTUS, smith v state economic growth burglary Sardis Alabama adnan syed, Guy Terrell Junior morgan county alabama second amendment ake v oklahoma towles v state Wesley Adam Whitworth gun rights sentencing law and policy blog summaries Rule 32 russell calhoun battles v state theft abandonment clarence thomas Gardendale Alabama asia mcclain sixth amendment baltimore city circuit court illegal gambling Xavier Beasley shooting death drug trafficking, fort payne alabama death penalty underage drinking assault fraud criminal mischief New York Times ex parte briseno gun control Fentanyl Malone v State drug possession, Etowah County Alabama, armed robbery Benn v State warrior alabama cherokee county alabama campbell v state aziz sayyed abuse Pleasant Grove Alabama apprendi v new jersey drug activity self defense prostitution sting US Supreme Court Update brady v maryland mcwilliams v dunn Dylann Roof brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix levins v state court of criminal appeal releases the mannequin challenge nicholas hawkins state of alabama criminal justice reform, Mike Hubbard tuscaloosa alabama banville v state department of justice drug seizure bailey v us hurst mandamus Stephen Breyer Kay Ivey nathan woods terell corey mcmullin § 13A-3-23 peyton pruitt drug busts shooting lethal injection drugs Tracie Todd narcotics investigation Kareem Dacar Gaymon shoplifting Alabaster alabama pell city alabama blountsville alabama dekalb county alabama sexual assault aiding and abetting parole john earle redfearn IV v state drug smuggling road rage decatur alabama court of criminal appeals benjamin todd acton West Alabama department of justice, christian guitierez alabama eugene lee jones v state serial sarah koenig avondale alabama theft of property heritage christian university Easter talladega superspeedway breaking and entering heflin alabama shelby county gadsden alabama Neil Gorsuch birmingham alabama hoax destructive devices beylund v north dakota fultondale alabama Eutaw Alabama maryland court of special appeals death penalty, capital offenses bomb threat springville alabama fraudulent checks trussville alabama montgomery alabama foley alabama Tommy Arthur brookside alabama 2016 election, habeas corpus relief criminal justice dothan alabama hurst v florida huntsville madison alabama adger alabama Shonda Walker, dora alabama drug crimes arson eleventh circuit ruling utah v strieff edwards v arizona alabama supreme court embezzlement utah supreme court Samuel Alito CCA update

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.