CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeals Decisions - April 2018

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, April 27, 2018

 Pruitt v. State 16-0956

 

 

Pruitt pleaded guilty to two counts of committing a sex act with a student, violations of § 13A-6-81, and two counts of distributing obscene material to a minor, violations of § 13A-12-200.5. These offenses involved 3 students Pruitt formerly taught. Pruitt was a teacher in the Blount County School system. She taught at the Locust Fork High School during the 2012-13 and 2013-14 school years. She taught the three students during this time. Beginning in the 2014-15 school year, Pruitt was transferred to Appalachian High School. During October 2014, she sent Student #1 nude Snapchat pictures, had deviate sexual intercourse with Student #2, and had sexual intercourse with Student #3. For all intents and purposes, the acts were consensual. These facts were stipulated by both sides. Prior to pleading guilty, Pruitt, relying on Lawrence v. Texas, argued that the statutes and charges were unconstitutional as applied to her. AFFIRMED The Court of Criminal Appeals rejected the Lawrence-based argument on the grounds that Lawrence explicitly held that the decision didn’t apply to conduct involving minors. Further, the Court concluded that the State has a legitimate state interest in “prohibiting intimate contact between a teacher and a student.” The Court likewise rejected Pruitt’s “consent” defense since the statute expressly says “consent is not a defense.” Finally, the Court held that the fact that Pruitt did not teach at the same school as the students did not entitle her to relief. The Court also rejected an argument that her violation for unlawful distribution of obscene material to a minor didn’t violate her right to Equal Protection to be free from State intervention in a private relationship with a consulting person. The Court ruled against this argument based on the student being a minor (per § 13A-12-200.1) and previous holdings that the State doesn’t violate Equal Protection concerns by prohibiting sexual contact with minors.
 
Towles v. State CR-15-0699
Towles was convicted of capital murder pursuant to §13A-5-40(a)(15) for killing his girlfriend’s son by hitting him on the buttocks with a piece of lumber. This appealed stemmed from a re-trial after the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed his capital murder conviction and death sentence years back. In the interim, Towles’ girlfriend pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. The girlfriend didn’t testify at trial. Towles’ defense was that she caused the death and then blackmailed him to help her cover up the child’s death. However, the State impeached Towles by discussing how she had pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. REVERSED The Court concluded that the introduction of the girlfriend’s conviction into evidence was improper evidence of Towles’ guilt. The Court also concluded that the trial court’s instruction that “knowledge of the probability of death or great bodily harm is sufficient to constitute murder” impermissibly lessened the State’s burden and undermined the defense’s argument that the killing was, at most, unintentional. Mr. Towles will now go back for his third trial.

 

Betton v. State CR-15-1501
Betton was a juvenile capital defendant seeking re-sentencing under Miller v. Alabama. Here, the circuit court re-sentenced him to LWOP without considering the factors the Alabama Supreme Court announced in Ex parte Henderson. REMANDED The Court held that remand was necessary for the circuit court to enter specific findings under Ex parte Henderson.
 
Battles v. State CR-17-0044
In a prosecution for unlawful possession of a pistol by a forbidden person pursuant to § 13A-11-72(a), Battles waived counsel and represented himself at trial. However, throughout, Battles complained that he didn’t understand the charges against him and complained that he didn’t have the resources necessary to defend his case. REVERSED The Court concluded that while Battles knowingly waived his right to represent himself at trial, the circuit court failed to the factors a court must discuss with a defendant pursuant to Fitzpatrick v. Wainwright, 800 F. 2d 1057 (11th Cir. 1986) and Tomlin v. State, 601 So. 2d 124 (Ala. 1991). Additionally, the court failed to tell Battles he could withdraw the waiver at any time.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

baltimore city circuit court criminal justice reform, minor offenses drug possession, narcotics investigation animal cruelty underage drinking eighth amendment, ake v oklahoma Kareem Dacar Gaymon attempted murder peyton pruitt clarence thomas shelby county Dylann Roof capital murder death penalty capital punishment pruitt v state texas sexual assault drug smuggling fourth amendment Gardendale Alabama stoves v state car accident ring v arizona kimberly alabama oneonta alabama crime of passion hall v florida embezzlement William Pryor drug crimes homicide rate legende v state christian guitierez editorial Pleasant Grove Alabama scotus moore v texas criminal mischief economic growth fraudulent checks executions fraud theft baldwin county alabama battles v state state of arizona Glaze v State Xavier Beasley debit card skimming scams morris alabama Joshua Reese hoover alabama cherokee county alabama maryland court of special appeals street racing lethal injection drugs nicholas hawkins abduction pelham alabama constitutional law, bailey v us birmingham alabama anniston alabama, brian fredick lucas serial ferguson missouri drug seizure gadsden alabama birchfield v north dakota alabama supreme court boaz alabama Rule 32 decatur alabama hurst v florida Stephen Breyer marion county smith v state arson adger alabama burglary keith v state criminal justice court systems, mccalla alabama moving violations tuscaloosa alabama sixth amendment florence alabama SCOTUS, armed robbery brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix Malone v State dothan alabama hoax destructive devices kidnapping social media 28 U.S.C. § 2254 benjamin todd acton blountsville alabama Thomas Hardiman death penalty, court of criminal appeal releases heflin alabama Jefferson County Alabama fultondale alabama constitutional violations aziz sayyed LWOP operation bullseye Easter Hillary Clinton, negligent homicide department of justice mike gilotti identity theft Ingmire v State bernard v north dakota betton v state beylund v north dakota towles v state eleventh circuit ruling banville v state albertville alabama Alonzo Ephraim south carolina apprendi v new jersey forced isolation Tommy Arthur New York Times Fentanyl self defense Justice Sotomayor stanley brent chapman limestone county alabama alabama law enforcement agency road rage huntsville hanceville alabama bessemer alabama gun rights shoplifting drug trafficking, adnan syed, avondale alabama utah v strieff hurst mandamus greene county alabama Guy Terrell Junior alabama criminal law roundup alfonso morris capital offenses Walker County Alabama ex parte briseno the mannequin challenge tarrant alabama Sardis Alabama cullman alabama domestic violence Shonda Walker, edwards v arizona warrantless blood draws mulga alabama john earle redfearn IV v state Wesley Adam Whitworth eric sterling court of criminal appeals making a murderer alabama second amendment sheffield v state dora alabama pinson alabama home repair fraud bomb threat concealed carry Donald Trump, unlawful manufacturing sarah koenig illegal gun carry Samuel Alito drug activity debtor prison Marengo County Alabama brady v maryland Tracie Todd christmas shooting gun control st clair county alabama fairfield alabama, Briarwood Presbyterian Church abuse lethal injection dekalb county alabama Mike Hubbard US Supreme Court Update terell corey mcmullin talladega superspeedway implied consent montgomery alabama mobile alabama judicial override habeas corpus relief russell calhoun Alabaster alabama Lucky D Arcade § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing Adamsville alabama npr abandonment OJ Simpson Made in America trussville alabama mountain brook alabama public assistance fraud West Alabama lauderdale county alabama breaking and entering drug busts illegal gambling foley alabama utah supreme court Eutaw Alabama netflix 2016 election, midazolam eugene lee jones v state fort payne alabama prostitution sting domestic abuse morgan county alabama campbell v state brookside alabama brendan dassey Kay Ivey department of justice, springville alabama parole steve avery homicide madison alabama kenneth eugene billups sentencing law and policy blog summaries asia mcclain § 13A-3-23 pell city alabama Etowah County Alabama, aiding and abetting fake kidnapping, state of alabama OJ Simpson assault rainbow city alabama mount olive alabama Neil Gorsuch lamar county Benn v State huntsville alabama shooting jerry bohannon church robberies Woods v State endangerment of a child robberies heritage christian university strickland v washington nathan woods shooting death theft of property felony assaults warrior alabama CCA update blount county alabama levins v state mcwilliams v dunn calhoun county alabama murder operation crackdown

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.