CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Supreme Court Update - New Protections Against Executing The Mentally Disabled

J.D. Lloyd - Thursday, March 30, 2017


Moore v. Texas (U.S. Supreme Court, March 28/2017)


Moore was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death. In post-trial proceedings, a circuit court concluded that Mr. Moore was intellectually disabled and, thus, ineligible for execution under Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) and Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. ___ (2014). The circuit court based its decision on the most current medical guidelines. However, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (“CCA”) rejected that conclusion and re-instated Moore’s death sentence. The CCA concluded that the circuit court erred in not following factors laid out in Ex parte Briseno, 135 S. W. 3d 1( 2004), which relied upon medical authority from 1992. Moore appealed, claiming the CCA’s reasoning violated the Eighth Amendment.



In Atkins, the Supreme Court opened the door to allow states to develop their own tests for determining intellectual disability and ineligibility for the death penalty. However, as the states have developed different tests, the Court has indicated it will review these procedures to determine whether the states have created “an unacceptable risk that persons with intellectual disability will be executed.” Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. at ___. Here, the Court took aim at Texas’ Atkins test for determining intellectual disability which was centered around out-dated medical information and court-created “factors” that have been widely criticized.


In holding that Mr. Moore was ineligible for the death penalty under Atkins, the circuit court relied on medical diagnostic standards coming from the 11th edition of the American Association on Intellectual and Development Disabilities (“AAIDD”) clinical manual and the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (“DSM-5”) published by the American Psychiatric Association. The court followed the “generally accepted, uncontroversial intellectual-disability diagnostic definitions” in reaching their conclusion. Basically, the circuit court relied on the most up-to-date diagnostic material in assessing Moore.


The CCA rejected the circuit court’s conclusion and chastised it for not applying the Briseno test for determining intellectual disability. The Briseno test was based upon the 9th edition of the AAIDD and included a seven-factor test that was not grounded in any medical authority -- just a judicial creation. The CCA recognized that the standards in the AAIDD may have changed, but concluded that the Briseno test “remained adequately informed by the medical community’s diagnostic framework.”


The Supreme Court concluded that the CCA’s reliance on out-dated medical information and “factors” that have been widely criticized and rejected in the legal and medical community could not comport with the Eighth Amendment as well as Atkins and Hall. While the State’s have leeway in formulating their own approach to addressing Atkins claims, the cornerstone of any scheme must be “the medical community’s diagnostic framework.”



Read the decision here



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


lethal injection drugs alabama law enforcement agency fraudulent checks albertville alabama prostitution sting court of criminal appeal releases ex parte briseno mount olive alabama montgomery alabama south carolina Benn v State gun rights abuse Stephen Breyer blount county alabama Thomas Hardiman shooting Kareem Dacar Gaymon anniston alabama, oneonta alabama talladega superspeedway sarah koenig stoves v state pruitt v state brady v maryland Rule 32 robberies breaking and entering lethal injection state of alabama sexual assault abandonment OJ Simpson Made in America huntsville alabama § 13A-3-23 aiding and abetting gadsden alabama Sardis Alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing CCA update negligent homicide marion county brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix nicholas hawkins US Supreme Court Update court systems, mcwilliams v dunn shelby county Dylann Roof huntsville hurst mandamus bessemer alabama executions domestic violence 28 U.S.C. § 2254 illegal gambling drug busts Ingmire v State church robberies West Alabama battles v state apprendi v new jersey ferguson missouri street racing domestic abuse lamar county hall v florida unlawful manufacturing Donald Trump, sixth amendment eugene lee jones v state Pleasant Grove Alabama utah supreme court ring v arizona the mannequin challenge LWOP state of arizona aziz sayyed campbell v state eighth amendment, kimberly alabama alabama sheffield v state strickland v washington death penalty, crime of passion clarence thomas Guy Terrell Junior capital murder Wesley Adam Whitworth Xavier Beasley texas st clair county alabama debtor prison economic growth illegal gun carry Eutaw Alabama constitutional law, department of justice npr armed robbery Hillary Clinton, home repair fraud eric sterling legende v state heflin alabama pinson alabama warrantless blood draws calhoun county alabama morris alabama eleventh circuit ruling Mike Hubbard mccalla alabama fultondale alabama greene county alabama maryland court of special appeals theft of property bernard v north dakota asia mcclain kenneth eugene billups Tommy Arthur Tracie Todd nathan woods editorial keith v state Alonzo Ephraim car accident boaz alabama trussville alabama Etowah County Alabama, brendan dassey tuscaloosa alabama pelham alabama pell city alabama operation crackdown heritage christian university mulga alabama assault hoover alabama shooting death drug trafficking, making a murderer drug activity peyton pruitt rainbow city alabama death penalty hoax destructive devices fake kidnapping, public assistance fraud Woods v State towles v state baldwin county alabama criminal mischief parole serial steve avery hurst v florida capital offenses moving violations jerry bohannon Walker County Alabama constitutional violations john earle redfearn IV v state fourth amendment homicide mobile alabama Joshua Reese second amendment Easter Alabaster alabama shoplifting SCOTUS, theft terell corey mcmullin christmas shooting beylund v north dakota scotus Marengo County Alabama dothan alabama baltimore city circuit court hanceville alabama department of justice, social media benjamin todd acton narcotics investigation gun control self defense decatur alabama debit card skimming scams 2016 election, dekalb county alabama levins v state moore v texas fraud lauderdale county alabama mountain brook alabama adger alabama identity theft forced isolation bailey v us dora alabama fort payne alabama arson alfonso morris embezzlement drug possession, morgan county alabama abduction avondale alabama murder sentencing law and policy blog summaries brookside alabama drug seizure criminal justice Justice Sotomayor Gardendale Alabama Glaze v State drug crimes Lucky D Arcade mike gilotti cherokee county alabama capital punishment New York Times felony assaults Samuel Alito Neil Gorsuch limestone county alabama tarrant alabama animal cruelty OJ Simpson alabama criminal law roundup drug smuggling Adamsville alabama smith v state springville alabama William Pryor florence alabama implied consent russell calhoun kidnapping operation bullseye adnan syed, brian fredick lucas habeas corpus relief netflix alabama supreme court Jefferson County Alabama ake v oklahoma bomb threat Shonda Walker, Fentanyl underage drinking birmingham alabama birchfield v north dakota midazolam edwards v arizona banville v state blountsville alabama utah v strieff fairfield alabama, Malone v State burglary stanley brent chapman homicide rate minor offenses foley alabama endangerment of a child christian guitierez attempted murder concealed carry judicial override cullman alabama warrior alabama court of criminal appeals criminal justice reform, road rage Briarwood Presbyterian Church Kay Ivey betton v state madison alabama



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.