CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Supreme Court Update - New Protections Against Executing The Mentally Disabled

J.D. Lloyd - Thursday, March 30, 2017


Moore v. Texas (U.S. Supreme Court, March 28/2017)


Moore was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death. In post-trial proceedings, a circuit court concluded that Mr. Moore was intellectually disabled and, thus, ineligible for execution under Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) and Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. ___ (2014). The circuit court based its decision on the most current medical guidelines. However, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (“CCA”) rejected that conclusion and re-instated Moore’s death sentence. The CCA concluded that the circuit court erred in not following factors laid out in Ex parte Briseno, 135 S. W. 3d 1( 2004), which relied upon medical authority from 1992. Moore appealed, claiming the CCA’s reasoning violated the Eighth Amendment.



In Atkins, the Supreme Court opened the door to allow states to develop their own tests for determining intellectual disability and ineligibility for the death penalty. However, as the states have developed different tests, the Court has indicated it will review these procedures to determine whether the states have created “an unacceptable risk that persons with intellectual disability will be executed.” Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. at ___. Here, the Court took aim at Texas’ Atkins test for determining intellectual disability which was centered around out-dated medical information and court-created “factors” that have been widely criticized.


In holding that Mr. Moore was ineligible for the death penalty under Atkins, the circuit court relied on medical diagnostic standards coming from the 11th edition of the American Association on Intellectual and Development Disabilities (“AAIDD”) clinical manual and the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (“DSM-5”) published by the American Psychiatric Association. The court followed the “generally accepted, uncontroversial intellectual-disability diagnostic definitions” in reaching their conclusion. Basically, the circuit court relied on the most up-to-date diagnostic material in assessing Moore.


The CCA rejected the circuit court’s conclusion and chastised it for not applying the Briseno test for determining intellectual disability. The Briseno test was based upon the 9th edition of the AAIDD and included a seven-factor test that was not grounded in any medical authority -- just a judicial creation. The CCA recognized that the standards in the AAIDD may have changed, but concluded that the Briseno test “remained adequately informed by the medical community’s diagnostic framework.”


The Supreme Court concluded that the CCA’s reliance on out-dated medical information and “factors” that have been widely criticized and rejected in the legal and medical community could not comport with the Eighth Amendment as well as Atkins and Hall. While the State’s have leeway in formulating their own approach to addressing Atkins claims, the cornerstone of any scheme must be “the medical community’s diagnostic framework.”



Read the decision here



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


arson West Alabama edwards v arizona lauderdale county alabama talladega superspeedway Thomas Hardiman montgomery alabama stanley brent chapman brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix russell calhoun blountsville alabama jerry bohannon implied consent Rule 32 nathan woods mike gilotti LWOP self defense oneonta alabama tarrant alabama Marengo County Alabama st clair county alabama warrantless blood draws § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing blount county alabama illegal gambling constitutional law, brian fredick lucas Stephen Breyer sexual assault bomb threat criminal justice § 13A-3-23 illegal gun carry eugene lee jones v state brookside alabama betton v state burglary banville v state florence alabama boaz alabama christmas shooting 2016 election, alabama strickland v washington alabama law enforcement agency capital murder mulga alabama drug crimes negligent homicide OJ Simpson birchfield v north dakota operation bullseye pinson alabama identity theft campbell v state warrior alabama crime of passion assault south carolina mount olive alabama hurst mandamus pell city alabama dora alabama benjamin todd acton morris alabama breaking and entering tuscaloosa alabama netflix Eutaw Alabama prostitution sting church robberies Easter New York Times anniston alabama, drug smuggling death penalty ake v oklahoma aziz sayyed mountain brook alabama stoves v state department of justice madison alabama state of alabama battles v state homicide Wesley Adam Whitworth eighth amendment, mccalla alabama bailey v us Joshua Reese Fentanyl Lucky D Arcade mobile alabama shooting moore v texas cherokee county alabama fourth amendment making a murderer attempted murder morgan county alabama habeas corpus relief asia mcclain keith v state ex parte briseno calhoun county alabama john earle redfearn IV v state fraudulent checks William Pryor utah supreme court albertville alabama Malone v State armed robbery narcotics investigation Neil Gorsuch gun rights kenneth eugene billups shooting death Donald Trump, baldwin county alabama towles v state cullman alabama Mike Hubbard pruitt v state parole operation crackdown kimberly alabama shoplifting trussville alabama domestic abuse legende v state debtor prison adnan syed, robberies drug seizure minor offenses huntsville state of arizona limestone county alabama maryland court of special appeals US Supreme Court Update gadsden alabama terell corey mcmullin marion county Glaze v State criminal justice reform, dekalb county alabama alabama supreme court clarence thomas heritage christian university abandonment brady v maryland Hillary Clinton, capital offenses Kay Ivey murder utah v strieff Shonda Walker, drug activity theft Benn v State felony assaults Xavier Beasley Guy Terrell Junior judicial override concealed carry birmingham alabama scotus texas bessemer alabama smith v state lethal injection fake kidnapping, lethal injection drugs hoover alabama abuse the mannequin challenge unlawful manufacturing homicide rate endangerment of a child Walker County Alabama sixth amendment Etowah County Alabama, Jefferson County Alabama foley alabama steve avery road rage SCOTUS, hurst v florida editorial Kareem Dacar Gaymon peyton pruitt fairfield alabama, alfonso morris home repair fraud ring v arizona capital punishment apprendi v new jersey fultondale alabama forced isolation Sardis Alabama adger alabama rainbow city alabama domestic violence Tracie Todd economic growth Justice Sotomayor public assistance fraud animal cruelty nicholas hawkins Adamsville alabama gun control kidnapping decatur alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 theft of property drug possession, dothan alabama debit card skimming scams hanceville alabama huntsville alabama greene county alabama sarah koenig second amendment sheffield v state fraud embezzlement ferguson missouri abduction beylund v north dakota pelham alabama hall v florida Dylann Roof heflin alabama moving violations executions levins v state avondale alabama fort payne alabama social media court of criminal appeals criminal mischief Ingmire v State Woods v State christian guitierez hoax destructive devices death penalty, Pleasant Grove Alabama underage drinking bernard v north dakota aiding and abetting Briarwood Presbyterian Church mcwilliams v dunn Tommy Arthur street racing Alabaster alabama npr shelby county court of criminal appeal releases CCA update sentencing law and policy blog summaries alabama criminal law roundup court systems, brendan dassey drug busts eric sterling drug trafficking, Alonzo Ephraim baltimore city circuit court car accident eleventh circuit ruling Samuel Alito midazolam constitutional violations springville alabama department of justice, OJ Simpson Made in America lamar county Gardendale Alabama serial



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.