CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeal Releases from March 17, 2017

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, March 27, 2017

 

Keith v. State (CR-15-1319)

Keith pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and first-degree unlawful possession of marijuana after police found drugs under the front seat of his car during an inventory search. Officers pulled Keith over when they ran his license plate and realized the tag didn’t match his car. When they ran Keith’s ID, they discovered he had outstanding warrants and placed him under arrest. His car was searched as an inventory search and the drugs were found inside. Keith moved to suppress on the grounds that the search was improper warrantless search.

REVERSED. The Court concluded that the State failed to show that inventory search was carried out “according to standard criteria and on the basis of something other than suspicion of criminal activity.” The Court focused on Ex parte Boyd, 542 So. 2d 1276 (Ala. 1989), where the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that an inventory search was not valid because there was no evidence that law enforcement carried out the search pursuant to policy. Here, the Court found the same deficiencies that the Boyd court found: conclusory statements regarding following inventory policy, a lack of an inventory list, no copy of the policy was presented, and no evidence the officer followed that policy. Judge Joiner wrote a lengthy dissent.

 

Thoughts: I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Alabama Supreme Court take this issue up and ask for clarification for inventory searches andBoyd’s lasting effect. To me, inventory search precedent focuses on whether officers can show a search really was an administrative search and not a fishing expedition.

 

Sheffield v. State (CR-15-1467)

Sheffield was convicted of murder. He argued that he shot the victim in self-defense or by accident. At trial, the State introduced a recording of a heated phone conversation between the defendant and his wife, which was pretty damning to the defense -- she basically said he murdered the victim and didn’t act in self defense. Sheffield tried to invoke martial privilege to exclude the conversation, but the court allowed its introduction via Rule 804(b)(3) -- statements against interest. The State’s theory was that it was against the spouse’s interest for Sheffield to get convicted of murder.

REVERSED. The Court acknowledged that this was a question of first impression -- whether a declarant’s statements made against her spouse’s penal interest may also be considered against her own pecuniary or proprietary interest. In looking at Oregon case law, the Court concluded that the test as to whether a statement fits within the purview of Rule 804(b)(3) comes down to two central questions: (1) Was the declarant’s primary motive in making the statement to hurt or help her own interest; and (2) Was the risk to the declarant-spouse so great that the statements are inherently reliable? Here, the Court concluded the statements were not against Sheffield’s spouse’s interest (she wanted to divorce him), so they should not have been admitted under Rule 804(b)(3). Moreover, the Court concluded that this error wasn’t harmless given slight evidence presented surrounding the fatal moments.

 

Smith v. State (CR13-0055)

Smith was convicted of two counts of capital murder for a brutal kidnapping-murder/robbery-murder he carried out. At sentencing, the victim’s mother and sister testified that they believed the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for Smith. Smith argued on appeal that this testimony was improper.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED. The Court concluded the victim’s family’s recommendations were improper victim impact statements regarding recommended sentences under Booth v. Maryland. The Court found these statements to be plain error and vacated the death sentence.

Thoughts: I’m not going to be surprised if this gets reversed by the AL SC saying that this error didn’t rise to the level of plain error. I could see the AL SC using Judge Windom’s dissent as a blue print for re-imposing Smith’s death sentence.

 

Legendre v. State (CR-16-0008)

Legendre was on probation and his PO filed a delinquency report alleging that he failed to report, left the state without permission, didn’t pay supervision fees, failed to pay court-ordered moneys, failed to report to CRO and failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse program. At the hearing, the PO testified to trying to contact Legendre and how Legendre had missed meetings with her. In revoking, the court concluded that Legendre’s failure to report rose to the level of “absconding,” which allowed the court to fully revoke his probation. Legendre appealed claiming that he had not absconded.

AFFIRMED. The Court concluded that between his failure to report and his failure to communicate with the PO once she had contacted, the State presented sufficient evidence to prove that Legendre absconded and could be fully revoke.

 

Banville v. State (CR-15-1384)

The preclusive bar of Rule 32.2(d) does not bar a second Rule 32 petition if the first Rule 32 petition was based only upon Rule 32.1(f) -- a request to file an out-of-time appeal.

 

Campbell v. State (CR-15-1187)

Stoves v. State (CR-14-1687)

Both of these cases involved a reversal of one conviction on Double Jeopardy grounds (i.e., duplicate offenses), but an affirming of the remaining counts. Both are fact-intensive and not particularly noteworthy.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

Eutaw Alabama ex parte briseno shelby county sentencing law and policy blog summaries brendan dassey brady v maryland robberies Thomas Hardiman the mannequin challenge fort payne alabama debit card skimming scams benjamin todd acton theft illegal gun carry prostitution sting levins v state abuse criminal justice reform, illegal gambling beylund v north dakota baldwin county alabama mike gilotti fraudulent checks road rage huntsville alabama strickland v washington apprendi v new jersey Walker County Alabama albertville alabama john earle redfearn IV v state armed robbery court of criminal appeals Etowah County Alabama, pruitt v state capital offenses terell corey mcmullin Jefferson County Alabama CCA update minor offenses Samuel Alito ake v oklahoma identity theft mulga alabama drug smuggling Tommy Arthur hoover alabama West Alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Tracie Todd stoves v state Stephen Breyer legende v state burglary mcwilliams v dunn blountsville alabama lamar county pell city alabama Malone v State adnan syed, warrantless blood draws Joshua Reese Kareem Dacar Gaymon bessemer alabama self defense edwards v arizona dekalb county alabama Donald Trump, limestone county alabama abduction moore v texas serial pelham alabama home repair fraud arson drug seizure Benn v State LWOP street racing Briarwood Presbyterian Church decatur alabama utah supreme court US Supreme Court Update keith v state public assistance fraud dothan alabama towles v state felony assaults aiding and abetting court systems, sixth amendment drug busts Rule 32 Glaze v State homicide rate Dylann Roof marion county operation bullseye hall v florida hanceville alabama forced isolation 2016 election, hurst mandamus fake kidnapping, greene county alabama Alonzo Ephraim christian guitierez banville v state blount county alabama trussville alabama Guy Terrell Junior § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing foley alabama Mike Hubbard fultondale alabama mobile alabama bomb threat attempted murder aziz sayyed ring v arizona Lucky D Arcade lethal injection alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix negligent homicide shooting unlawful manufacturing department of justice betton v state drug possession, department of justice, brookside alabama springville alabama embezzlement steve avery kimberly alabama hoax destructive devices Hillary Clinton, morgan county alabama theft of property alabama law enforcement agency bailey v us car accident operation crackdown state of arizona madison alabama warrior alabama gun control Wesley Adam Whitworth sarah koenig criminal justice stanley brent chapman tarrant alabama anniston alabama, murder underage drinking debtor prison Easter gun rights hurst v florida domestic violence abandonment OJ Simpson Made in America Fentanyl crime of passion sexual assault capital murder alabama supreme court eighth amendment, huntsville adger alabama habeas corpus relief fraud parole assault second amendment brian fredick lucas smith v state death penalty editorial endangerment of a child Woods v State calhoun county alabama fourth amendment SCOTUS, nicholas hawkins sheffield v state russell calhoun Ingmire v State jerry bohannon kidnapping heflin alabama drug trafficking, constitutional law, asia mcclain clarence thomas birmingham alabama animal cruelty alfonso morris breaking and entering New York Times montgomery alabama cherokee county alabama peyton pruitt baltimore city circuit court Kay Ivey mountain brook alabama bernard v north dakota church robberies OJ Simpson Justice Sotomayor npr Adamsville alabama netflix implied consent campbell v state capital punishment alabama criminal law roundup ferguson missouri criminal mischief morris alabama midazolam scotus dora alabama mccalla alabama eleventh circuit ruling social media constitutional violations Pleasant Grove Alabama Xavier Beasley drug activity fairfield alabama, lethal injection drugs christmas shooting narcotics investigation Alabaster alabama tuscaloosa alabama birchfield v north dakota talladega superspeedway eugene lee jones v state texas moving violations § 13A-3-23 south carolina utah v strieff battles v state lauderdale county alabama cullman alabama pinson alabama rainbow city alabama mount olive alabama Gardendale Alabama court of criminal appeal releases boaz alabama st clair county alabama florence alabama heritage christian university kenneth eugene billups gadsden alabama eric sterling Shonda Walker, domestic abuse death penalty, Neil Gorsuch shooting death concealed carry nathan woods Marengo County Alabama avondale alabama making a murderer judicial override William Pryor state of alabama Sardis Alabama homicide economic growth maryland court of special appeals executions drug crimes shoplifting oneonta alabama

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.