CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeal Releases from March 17, 2017

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, March 27, 2017

 

Keith v. State (CR-15-1319)

Keith pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and first-degree unlawful possession of marijuana after police found drugs under the front seat of his car during an inventory search. Officers pulled Keith over when they ran his license plate and realized the tag didn’t match his car. When they ran Keith’s ID, they discovered he had outstanding warrants and placed him under arrest. His car was searched as an inventory search and the drugs were found inside. Keith moved to suppress on the grounds that the search was improper warrantless search.

REVERSED. The Court concluded that the State failed to show that inventory search was carried out “according to standard criteria and on the basis of something other than suspicion of criminal activity.” The Court focused on Ex parte Boyd, 542 So. 2d 1276 (Ala. 1989), where the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that an inventory search was not valid because there was no evidence that law enforcement carried out the search pursuant to policy. Here, the Court found the same deficiencies that the Boyd court found: conclusory statements regarding following inventory policy, a lack of an inventory list, no copy of the policy was presented, and no evidence the officer followed that policy. Judge Joiner wrote a lengthy dissent.

 

Thoughts: I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Alabama Supreme Court take this issue up and ask for clarification for inventory searches andBoyd’s lasting effect. To me, inventory search precedent focuses on whether officers can show a search really was an administrative search and not a fishing expedition.

 

Sheffield v. State (CR-15-1467)

Sheffield was convicted of murder. He argued that he shot the victim in self-defense or by accident. At trial, the State introduced a recording of a heated phone conversation between the defendant and his wife, which was pretty damning to the defense -- she basically said he murdered the victim and didn’t act in self defense. Sheffield tried to invoke martial privilege to exclude the conversation, but the court allowed its introduction via Rule 804(b)(3) -- statements against interest. The State’s theory was that it was against the spouse’s interest for Sheffield to get convicted of murder.

REVERSED. The Court acknowledged that this was a question of first impression -- whether a declarant’s statements made against her spouse’s penal interest may also be considered against her own pecuniary or proprietary interest. In looking at Oregon case law, the Court concluded that the test as to whether a statement fits within the purview of Rule 804(b)(3) comes down to two central questions: (1) Was the declarant’s primary motive in making the statement to hurt or help her own interest; and (2) Was the risk to the declarant-spouse so great that the statements are inherently reliable? Here, the Court concluded the statements were not against Sheffield’s spouse’s interest (she wanted to divorce him), so they should not have been admitted under Rule 804(b)(3). Moreover, the Court concluded that this error wasn’t harmless given slight evidence presented surrounding the fatal moments.

 

Smith v. State (CR13-0055)

Smith was convicted of two counts of capital murder for a brutal kidnapping-murder/robbery-murder he carried out. At sentencing, the victim’s mother and sister testified that they believed the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for Smith. Smith argued on appeal that this testimony was improper.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED. The Court concluded the victim’s family’s recommendations were improper victim impact statements regarding recommended sentences under Booth v. Maryland. The Court found these statements to be plain error and vacated the death sentence.

Thoughts: I’m not going to be surprised if this gets reversed by the AL SC saying that this error didn’t rise to the level of plain error. I could see the AL SC using Judge Windom’s dissent as a blue print for re-imposing Smith’s death sentence.

 

Legendre v. State (CR-16-0008)

Legendre was on probation and his PO filed a delinquency report alleging that he failed to report, left the state without permission, didn’t pay supervision fees, failed to pay court-ordered moneys, failed to report to CRO and failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse program. At the hearing, the PO testified to trying to contact Legendre and how Legendre had missed meetings with her. In revoking, the court concluded that Legendre’s failure to report rose to the level of “absconding,” which allowed the court to fully revoke his probation. Legendre appealed claiming that he had not absconded.

AFFIRMED. The Court concluded that between his failure to report and his failure to communicate with the PO once she had contacted, the State presented sufficient evidence to prove that Legendre absconded and could be fully revoke.

 

Banville v. State (CR-15-1384)

The preclusive bar of Rule 32.2(d) does not bar a second Rule 32 petition if the first Rule 32 petition was based only upon Rule 32.1(f) -- a request to file an out-of-time appeal.

 

Campbell v. State (CR-15-1187)

Stoves v. State (CR-14-1687)

Both of these cases involved a reversal of one conviction on Double Jeopardy grounds (i.e., duplicate offenses), but an affirming of the remaining counts. Both are fact-intensive and not particularly noteworthy.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

abduction Wesley Adam Whitworth pruitt v state prostitution sting cherokee county alabama mobile alabama lauderdale county alabama gun rights birmingham alabama hoax destructive devices edwards v arizona road rage illegal gambling christian guitierez unlawful manufacturing cullman alabama crime of passion steve avery New York Times Walker County Alabama abandonment the mannequin challenge Fentanyl madison alabama rainbow city alabama homicide habeas corpus relief lamar county criminal justice murder domestic abuse assault Jefferson County Alabama self defense robberies russell calhoun Kareem Dacar Gaymon Etowah County Alabama, stanley brent chapman shoplifting homicide rate dora alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church battles v state theft of property utah supreme court asia mcclain felony assaults Dylann Roof south carolina department of justice, trussville alabama parole stoves v state Eutaw Alabama fort payne alabama mountain brook alabama dekalb county alabama OJ Simpson Made in America Neil Gorsuch st clair county alabama levins v state alabama criminal law roundup underage drinking tuscaloosa alabama apprendi v new jersey Tracie Todd serial alabama scotus shooting death anniston alabama, warrior alabama eleventh circuit ruling court of criminal appeals 28 U.S.C. § 2254 arson florence alabama brookside alabama Malone v State sentencing law and policy blog summaries huntsville lethal injection mcwilliams v dunn midazolam blountsville alabama operation bullseye burglary drug activity john earle redfearn IV v state concealed carry hoover alabama sheffield v state hanceville alabama limestone county alabama utah v strieff Glaze v State kenneth eugene billups beylund v north dakota illegal gun carry social media ferguson missouri aziz sayyed mike gilotti fraudulent checks Xavier Beasley eugene lee jones v state birchfield v north dakota hurst v florida Tommy Arthur negligent homicide towles v state drug crimes christmas shooting drug trafficking, § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing campbell v state sexual assault heflin alabama Joshua Reese Pleasant Grove Alabama Alabaster alabama smith v state Stephen Breyer kimberly alabama texas state of alabama second amendment fake kidnapping, tarrant alabama decatur alabama brian fredick lucas Rule 32 public assistance fraud Justice Sotomayor netflix constitutional law, legende v state adger alabama Samuel Alito bomb threat peyton pruitt pelham alabama William Pryor bernard v north dakota Guy Terrell Junior pell city alabama Woods v State CCA update blount county alabama church robberies betton v state OJ Simpson alabama law enforcement agency Kay Ivey talladega superspeedway fairfield alabama, Marengo County Alabama Mike Hubbard mount olive alabama capital murder § 13A-3-23 Thomas Hardiman drug possession, gun control debtor prison Gardendale Alabama 2016 election, moving violations morgan county alabama baldwin county alabama avondale alabama implied consent eighth amendment, economic growth endangerment of a child baltimore city circuit court Shonda Walker, terell corey mcmullin gadsden alabama morris alabama death penalty, springville alabama boaz alabama clarence thomas sixth amendment alabama supreme court ex parte briseno editorial street racing drug busts greene county alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix US Supreme Court Update drug seizure nicholas hawkins montgomery alabama strickland v washington department of justice Ingmire v State court systems, Adamsville alabama shelby county drug smuggling banville v state Lucky D Arcade oneonta alabama Alonzo Ephraim minor offenses criminal mischief nathan woods constitutional violations mulga alabama operation crackdown bessemer alabama executions state of arizona brendan dassey kidnapping animal cruelty benjamin todd acton fraud dothan alabama judicial override death penalty Donald Trump, making a murderer court of criminal appeal releases forced isolation fultondale alabama abuse capital punishment aiding and abetting identity theft mccalla alabama huntsville alabama attempted murder hall v florida fourth amendment theft debit card skimming scams home repair fraud shooting adnan syed, brady v maryland West Alabama criminal justice reform, ake v oklahoma pinson alabama jerry bohannon bailey v us car accident hurst mandamus npr capital offenses LWOP marion county SCOTUS, heritage christian university moore v texas alfonso morris domestic violence albertville alabama maryland court of special appeals calhoun county alabama lethal injection drugs Hillary Clinton, armed robbery Benn v State warrantless blood draws sarah koenig keith v state eric sterling Sardis Alabama breaking and entering foley alabama narcotics investigation embezzlement Easter ring v arizona

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.