CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeal Releases from March 17, 2017

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, March 27, 2017


Keith v. State (CR-15-1319)

Keith pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and first-degree unlawful possession of marijuana after police found drugs under the front seat of his car during an inventory search. Officers pulled Keith over when they ran his license plate and realized the tag didn’t match his car. When they ran Keith’s ID, they discovered he had outstanding warrants and placed him under arrest. His car was searched as an inventory search and the drugs were found inside. Keith moved to suppress on the grounds that the search was improper warrantless search.

REVERSED. The Court concluded that the State failed to show that inventory search was carried out “according to standard criteria and on the basis of something other than suspicion of criminal activity.” The Court focused on Ex parte Boyd, 542 So. 2d 1276 (Ala. 1989), where the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that an inventory search was not valid because there was no evidence that law enforcement carried out the search pursuant to policy. Here, the Court found the same deficiencies that the Boyd court found: conclusory statements regarding following inventory policy, a lack of an inventory list, no copy of the policy was presented, and no evidence the officer followed that policy. Judge Joiner wrote a lengthy dissent.


Thoughts: I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Alabama Supreme Court take this issue up and ask for clarification for inventory searches andBoyd’s lasting effect. To me, inventory search precedent focuses on whether officers can show a search really was an administrative search and not a fishing expedition.


Sheffield v. State (CR-15-1467)

Sheffield was convicted of murder. He argued that he shot the victim in self-defense or by accident. At trial, the State introduced a recording of a heated phone conversation between the defendant and his wife, which was pretty damning to the defense -- she basically said he murdered the victim and didn’t act in self defense. Sheffield tried to invoke martial privilege to exclude the conversation, but the court allowed its introduction via Rule 804(b)(3) -- statements against interest. The State’s theory was that it was against the spouse’s interest for Sheffield to get convicted of murder.

REVERSED. The Court acknowledged that this was a question of first impression -- whether a declarant’s statements made against her spouse’s penal interest may also be considered against her own pecuniary or proprietary interest. In looking at Oregon case law, the Court concluded that the test as to whether a statement fits within the purview of Rule 804(b)(3) comes down to two central questions: (1) Was the declarant’s primary motive in making the statement to hurt or help her own interest; and (2) Was the risk to the declarant-spouse so great that the statements are inherently reliable? Here, the Court concluded the statements were not against Sheffield’s spouse’s interest (she wanted to divorce him), so they should not have been admitted under Rule 804(b)(3). Moreover, the Court concluded that this error wasn’t harmless given slight evidence presented surrounding the fatal moments.


Smith v. State (CR13-0055)

Smith was convicted of two counts of capital murder for a brutal kidnapping-murder/robbery-murder he carried out. At sentencing, the victim’s mother and sister testified that they believed the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for Smith. Smith argued on appeal that this testimony was improper.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED. The Court concluded the victim’s family’s recommendations were improper victim impact statements regarding recommended sentences under Booth v. Maryland. The Court found these statements to be plain error and vacated the death sentence.

Thoughts: I’m not going to be surprised if this gets reversed by the AL SC saying that this error didn’t rise to the level of plain error. I could see the AL SC using Judge Windom’s dissent as a blue print for re-imposing Smith’s death sentence.


Legendre v. State (CR-16-0008)

Legendre was on probation and his PO filed a delinquency report alleging that he failed to report, left the state without permission, didn’t pay supervision fees, failed to pay court-ordered moneys, failed to report to CRO and failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse program. At the hearing, the PO testified to trying to contact Legendre and how Legendre had missed meetings with her. In revoking, the court concluded that Legendre’s failure to report rose to the level of “absconding,” which allowed the court to fully revoke his probation. Legendre appealed claiming that he had not absconded.

AFFIRMED. The Court concluded that between his failure to report and his failure to communicate with the PO once she had contacted, the State presented sufficient evidence to prove that Legendre absconded and could be fully revoke.


Banville v. State (CR-15-1384)

The preclusive bar of Rule 32.2(d) does not bar a second Rule 32 petition if the first Rule 32 petition was based only upon Rule 32.1(f) -- a request to file an out-of-time appeal.


Campbell v. State (CR-15-1187)

Stoves v. State (CR-14-1687)

Both of these cases involved a reversal of one conviction on Double Jeopardy grounds (i.e., duplicate offenses), but an affirming of the remaining counts. Both are fact-intensive and not particularly noteworthy.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


alabama criminal law roundup social media rainbow city alabama kidnapping boaz alabama sheffield v state christmas shooting Briarwood Presbyterian Church underage drinking OJ Simpson Made in America netflix utah supreme court crime of passion gadsden alabama huntsville heritage christian university hanceville alabama trussville alabama alfonso morris Sardis Alabama New York Times brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix constitutional violations drug trafficking, Rule 32 arson criminal justice assault blountsville alabama hurst v florida drug crimes Walker County Alabama christian guitierez clarence thomas hurst mandamus tarrant alabama stoves v state beylund v north dakota Kareem Dacar Gaymon florence alabama capital punishment endangerment of a child debit card skimming scams Guy Terrell Junior mccalla alabama bessemer alabama calhoun county alabama negligent homicide minor offenses midazolam marion county hoax destructive devices car accident embezzlement bomb threat Tracie Todd texas foley alabama LWOP criminal mischief pruitt v state baldwin county alabama department of justice decatur alabama court systems, Donald Trump, drug activity bernard v north dakota animal cruelty brian fredick lucas Justice Sotomayor § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing Alabaster alabama domestic abuse domestic violence baltimore city circuit court anniston alabama, eric sterling Wesley Adam Whitworth court of criminal appeal releases Eutaw Alabama moving violations Dylann Roof limestone county alabama apprendi v new jersey breaking and entering lauderdale county alabama albertville alabama alabama supreme court implied consent st clair county alabama attempted murder fraudulent checks eighth amendment, talladega superspeedway identity theft Samuel Alito fairfield alabama, sarah koenig theft abuse economic growth strickland v washington constitutional law, Ingmire v State smith v state Alonzo Ephraim West Alabama felony assaults scotus death penalty, Mike Hubbard birchfield v north dakota Glaze v State huntsville alabama dora alabama sentencing law and policy blog summaries adger alabama mcwilliams v dunn parole making a murderer battles v state department of justice, lethal injection drugs drug busts mike gilotti Neil Gorsuch Malone v State npr shelby county steve avery campbell v state public assistance fraud concealed carry peyton pruitt operation crackdown Marengo County Alabama editorial brookside alabama levins v state capital murder nicholas hawkins Joshua Reese CCA update madison alabama illegal gun carry Jefferson County Alabama benjamin todd acton 28 U.S.C. § 2254 road rage warrior alabama Gardendale Alabama Tommy Arthur William Pryor birmingham alabama pell city alabama morgan county alabama court of criminal appeals john earle redfearn IV v state terell corey mcmullin homicide debtor prison Pleasant Grove Alabama greene county alabama homicide rate sexual assault robberies betton v state jerry bohannon Benn v State death penalty serial morris alabama edwards v arizona kimberly alabama illegal gambling adnan syed, capital offenses asia mcclain nathan woods eugene lee jones v state state of arizona warrantless blood draws shooting death unlawful manufacturing mount olive alabama Fentanyl gun rights US Supreme Court Update mobile alabama heflin alabama drug smuggling operation bullseye shooting narcotics investigation fultondale alabama brendan dassey alabama law enforcement agency home repair fraud Thomas Hardiman dothan alabama drug seizure hoover alabama towles v state judicial override shoplifting abduction bailey v us SCOTUS, abandonment fraud second amendment mulga alabama self defense maryland court of special appeals springville alabama murder criminal justice reform, street racing eleventh circuit ruling avondale alabama the mannequin challenge ferguson missouri Etowah County Alabama, fort payne alabama armed robbery stanley brent chapman prostitution sting aziz sayyed executions mountain brook alabama lethal injection legende v state Adamsville alabama banville v state forced isolation cherokee county alabama state of alabama blount county alabama ring v arizona alabama sixth amendment Hillary Clinton, gun control church robberies Lucky D Arcade lamar county ake v oklahoma fake kidnapping, tuscaloosa alabama Kay Ivey 2016 election, oneonta alabama Stephen Breyer pinson alabama moore v texas drug possession, hall v florida aiding and abetting utah v strieff OJ Simpson Shonda Walker, montgomery alabama theft of property kenneth eugene billups russell calhoun habeas corpus relief brady v maryland ex parte briseno keith v state pelham alabama burglary south carolina fourth amendment § 13A-3-23 Xavier Beasley cullman alabama Easter dekalb county alabama Woods v State



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.