CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeal Releases from March 17, 2017

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, March 27, 2017


Keith v. State (CR-15-1319)

Keith pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and first-degree unlawful possession of marijuana after police found drugs under the front seat of his car during an inventory search. Officers pulled Keith over when they ran his license plate and realized the tag didn’t match his car. When they ran Keith’s ID, they discovered he had outstanding warrants and placed him under arrest. His car was searched as an inventory search and the drugs were found inside. Keith moved to suppress on the grounds that the search was improper warrantless search.

REVERSED. The Court concluded that the State failed to show that inventory search was carried out “according to standard criteria and on the basis of something other than suspicion of criminal activity.” The Court focused on Ex parte Boyd, 542 So. 2d 1276 (Ala. 1989), where the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that an inventory search was not valid because there was no evidence that law enforcement carried out the search pursuant to policy. Here, the Court found the same deficiencies that the Boyd court found: conclusory statements regarding following inventory policy, a lack of an inventory list, no copy of the policy was presented, and no evidence the officer followed that policy. Judge Joiner wrote a lengthy dissent.


Thoughts: I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Alabama Supreme Court take this issue up and ask for clarification for inventory searches andBoyd’s lasting effect. To me, inventory search precedent focuses on whether officers can show a search really was an administrative search and not a fishing expedition.


Sheffield v. State (CR-15-1467)

Sheffield was convicted of murder. He argued that he shot the victim in self-defense or by accident. At trial, the State introduced a recording of a heated phone conversation between the defendant and his wife, which was pretty damning to the defense -- she basically said he murdered the victim and didn’t act in self defense. Sheffield tried to invoke martial privilege to exclude the conversation, but the court allowed its introduction via Rule 804(b)(3) -- statements against interest. The State’s theory was that it was against the spouse’s interest for Sheffield to get convicted of murder.

REVERSED. The Court acknowledged that this was a question of first impression -- whether a declarant’s statements made against her spouse’s penal interest may also be considered against her own pecuniary or proprietary interest. In looking at Oregon case law, the Court concluded that the test as to whether a statement fits within the purview of Rule 804(b)(3) comes down to two central questions: (1) Was the declarant’s primary motive in making the statement to hurt or help her own interest; and (2) Was the risk to the declarant-spouse so great that the statements are inherently reliable? Here, the Court concluded the statements were not against Sheffield’s spouse’s interest (she wanted to divorce him), so they should not have been admitted under Rule 804(b)(3). Moreover, the Court concluded that this error wasn’t harmless given slight evidence presented surrounding the fatal moments.


Smith v. State (CR13-0055)

Smith was convicted of two counts of capital murder for a brutal kidnapping-murder/robbery-murder he carried out. At sentencing, the victim’s mother and sister testified that they believed the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for Smith. Smith argued on appeal that this testimony was improper.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED. The Court concluded the victim’s family’s recommendations were improper victim impact statements regarding recommended sentences under Booth v. Maryland. The Court found these statements to be plain error and vacated the death sentence.

Thoughts: I’m not going to be surprised if this gets reversed by the AL SC saying that this error didn’t rise to the level of plain error. I could see the AL SC using Judge Windom’s dissent as a blue print for re-imposing Smith’s death sentence.


Legendre v. State (CR-16-0008)

Legendre was on probation and his PO filed a delinquency report alleging that he failed to report, left the state without permission, didn’t pay supervision fees, failed to pay court-ordered moneys, failed to report to CRO and failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse program. At the hearing, the PO testified to trying to contact Legendre and how Legendre had missed meetings with her. In revoking, the court concluded that Legendre’s failure to report rose to the level of “absconding,” which allowed the court to fully revoke his probation. Legendre appealed claiming that he had not absconded.

AFFIRMED. The Court concluded that between his failure to report and his failure to communicate with the PO once she had contacted, the State presented sufficient evidence to prove that Legendre absconded and could be fully revoke.


Banville v. State (CR-15-1384)

The preclusive bar of Rule 32.2(d) does not bar a second Rule 32 petition if the first Rule 32 petition was based only upon Rule 32.1(f) -- a request to file an out-of-time appeal.


Campbell v. State (CR-15-1187)

Stoves v. State (CR-14-1687)

Both of these cases involved a reversal of one conviction on Double Jeopardy grounds (i.e., duplicate offenses), but an affirming of the remaining counts. Both are fact-intensive and not particularly noteworthy.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


alfonso morris huntsville alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church oneonta alabama prostitution sting baldwin county alabama hall v florida brendan dassey Kareem Dacar Gaymon campbell v state Lucky D Arcade springville alabama hurst v florida stanley brent chapman Hillary Clinton, limestone county alabama car accident Joshua Reese murder brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix mobile alabama editorial drug seizure fairfield alabama, identity theft terell corey mcmullin drug possession, embezzlement crime of passion fort payne alabama department of justice death penalty Stephen Breyer theft fraudulent checks alabama state of arizona home repair fraud Tommy Arthur OJ Simpson Made in America pelham alabama baltimore city circuit court cherokee county alabama hanceville alabama fultondale alabama bernard v north dakota ferguson missouri shooting peyton pruitt brian fredick lucas bomb threat Adamsville alabama court systems, drug crimes netflix SCOTUS, trussville alabama madison alabama asia mcclain heritage christian university pruitt v state 28 U.S.C. § 2254 alabama law enforcement agency Glaze v State Kay Ivey blountsville alabama constitutional violations mulga alabama avondale alabama banville v state making a murderer criminal mischief domestic violence strickland v washington nicholas hawkins npr department of justice, Mike Hubbard court of criminal appeals US Supreme Court Update aiding and abetting ring v arizona fraud Pleasant Grove Alabama Walker County Alabama operation bullseye maryland court of special appeals eighth amendment, Xavier Beasley Wesley Adam Whitworth Samuel Alito mike gilotti eugene lee jones v state gun rights levins v state operation crackdown debit card skimming scams street racing criminal justice reform, nathan woods OJ Simpson second amendment beylund v north dakota gadsden alabama south carolina Fentanyl birmingham alabama road rage bailey v us Eutaw Alabama mcwilliams v dunn tuscaloosa alabama tarrant alabama alabama criminal law roundup executions st clair county alabama utah v strieff theft of property forced isolation edwards v arizona moore v texas Tracie Todd dekalb county alabama alabama supreme court jerry bohannon unlawful manufacturing Etowah County Alabama, robberies cullman alabama hoax destructive devices sexual assault decatur alabama pinson alabama habeas corpus relief constitutional law, LWOP burglary Donald Trump, social media john earle redfearn IV v state lethal injection drugs warrantless blood draws anniston alabama, abuse implied consent russell calhoun florence alabama brookside alabama capital punishment boaz alabama death penalty, shooting death gun control public assistance fraud betton v state hurst mandamus legende v state concealed carry attempted murder kenneth eugene billups 2016 election, assault the mannequin challenge Rule 32 William Pryor stoves v state calhoun county alabama aziz sayyed CCA update Woods v State fake kidnapping, negligent homicide lethal injection Dylann Roof kimberly alabama Shonda Walker, felony assaults brady v maryland heflin alabama homicide rate church robberies West Alabama adger alabama Ingmire v State benjamin todd acton greene county alabama warrior alabama drug trafficking, ex parte briseno Jefferson County Alabama christian guitierez fourth amendment mountain brook alabama clarence thomas Alabaster alabama sentencing law and policy blog summaries abduction scotus serial marion county steve avery christmas shooting lamar county drug activity smith v state narcotics investigation midazolam homicide shelby county Easter utah supreme court Gardendale Alabama pell city alabama lauderdale county alabama birchfield v north dakota judicial override mount olive alabama Sardis Alabama dora alabama capital murder self defense Neil Gorsuch eleventh circuit ruling Thomas Hardiman bessemer alabama battles v state towles v state parole domestic abuse state of alabama Guy Terrell Junior texas criminal justice mccalla alabama moving violations shoplifting § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing morris alabama debtor prison § 13A-3-23 dothan alabama breaking and entering drug busts ake v oklahoma sheffield v state endangerment of a child New York Times Marengo County Alabama armed robbery adnan syed, sarah koenig Alonzo Ephraim foley alabama kidnapping Justice Sotomayor apprendi v new jersey keith v state Malone v State underage drinking illegal gambling rainbow city alabama drug smuggling Benn v State minor offenses abandonment blount county alabama arson talladega superspeedway hoover alabama huntsville montgomery alabama economic growth illegal gun carry capital offenses animal cruelty eric sterling court of criminal appeal releases morgan county alabama albertville alabama sixth amendment



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.