CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeal Releases from March 17, 2017

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, March 27, 2017

 

Keith v. State (CR-15-1319)

Keith pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and first-degree unlawful possession of marijuana after police found drugs under the front seat of his car during an inventory search. Officers pulled Keith over when they ran his license plate and realized the tag didn’t match his car. When they ran Keith’s ID, they discovered he had outstanding warrants and placed him under arrest. His car was searched as an inventory search and the drugs were found inside. Keith moved to suppress on the grounds that the search was improper warrantless search.

REVERSED. The Court concluded that the State failed to show that inventory search was carried out “according to standard criteria and on the basis of something other than suspicion of criminal activity.” The Court focused on Ex parte Boyd, 542 So. 2d 1276 (Ala. 1989), where the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that an inventory search was not valid because there was no evidence that law enforcement carried out the search pursuant to policy. Here, the Court found the same deficiencies that the Boyd court found: conclusory statements regarding following inventory policy, a lack of an inventory list, no copy of the policy was presented, and no evidence the officer followed that policy. Judge Joiner wrote a lengthy dissent.

 

Thoughts: I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Alabama Supreme Court take this issue up and ask for clarification for inventory searches andBoyd’s lasting effect. To me, inventory search precedent focuses on whether officers can show a search really was an administrative search and not a fishing expedition.

 

Sheffield v. State (CR-15-1467)

Sheffield was convicted of murder. He argued that he shot the victim in self-defense or by accident. At trial, the State introduced a recording of a heated phone conversation between the defendant and his wife, which was pretty damning to the defense -- she basically said he murdered the victim and didn’t act in self defense. Sheffield tried to invoke martial privilege to exclude the conversation, but the court allowed its introduction via Rule 804(b)(3) -- statements against interest. The State’s theory was that it was against the spouse’s interest for Sheffield to get convicted of murder.

REVERSED. The Court acknowledged that this was a question of first impression -- whether a declarant’s statements made against her spouse’s penal interest may also be considered against her own pecuniary or proprietary interest. In looking at Oregon case law, the Court concluded that the test as to whether a statement fits within the purview of Rule 804(b)(3) comes down to two central questions: (1) Was the declarant’s primary motive in making the statement to hurt or help her own interest; and (2) Was the risk to the declarant-spouse so great that the statements are inherently reliable? Here, the Court concluded the statements were not against Sheffield’s spouse’s interest (she wanted to divorce him), so they should not have been admitted under Rule 804(b)(3). Moreover, the Court concluded that this error wasn’t harmless given slight evidence presented surrounding the fatal moments.

 

Smith v. State (CR13-0055)

Smith was convicted of two counts of capital murder for a brutal kidnapping-murder/robbery-murder he carried out. At sentencing, the victim’s mother and sister testified that they believed the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for Smith. Smith argued on appeal that this testimony was improper.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED. The Court concluded the victim’s family’s recommendations were improper victim impact statements regarding recommended sentences under Booth v. Maryland. The Court found these statements to be plain error and vacated the death sentence.

Thoughts: I’m not going to be surprised if this gets reversed by the AL SC saying that this error didn’t rise to the level of plain error. I could see the AL SC using Judge Windom’s dissent as a blue print for re-imposing Smith’s death sentence.

 

Legendre v. State (CR-16-0008)

Legendre was on probation and his PO filed a delinquency report alleging that he failed to report, left the state without permission, didn’t pay supervision fees, failed to pay court-ordered moneys, failed to report to CRO and failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse program. At the hearing, the PO testified to trying to contact Legendre and how Legendre had missed meetings with her. In revoking, the court concluded that Legendre’s failure to report rose to the level of “absconding,” which allowed the court to fully revoke his probation. Legendre appealed claiming that he had not absconded.

AFFIRMED. The Court concluded that between his failure to report and his failure to communicate with the PO once she had contacted, the State presented sufficient evidence to prove that Legendre absconded and could be fully revoke.

 

Banville v. State (CR-15-1384)

The preclusive bar of Rule 32.2(d) does not bar a second Rule 32 petition if the first Rule 32 petition was based only upon Rule 32.1(f) -- a request to file an out-of-time appeal.

 

Campbell v. State (CR-15-1187)

Stoves v. State (CR-14-1687)

Both of these cases involved a reversal of one conviction on Double Jeopardy grounds (i.e., duplicate offenses), but an affirming of the remaining counts. Both are fact-intensive and not particularly noteworthy.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

Stephen Breyer drug smuggling texas Kay Ivey theft sexual assault editorial lethal injection breaking and entering drug trafficking, Alonzo Ephraim Tommy Arthur mobile alabama Xavier Beasley car accident murder unlawful manufacturing stanley brent chapman peyton pruitt burglary gun control campbell v state montgomery alabama theft of property rainbow city alabama criminal justice domestic abuse habeas corpus relief keith v state home repair fraud OJ Simpson strickland v washington madison alabama Justice Sotomayor aiding and abetting adger alabama forced isolation adnan syed, bomb threat baldwin county alabama homicide rate limestone county alabama church robberies economic growth brady v maryland the mannequin challenge serial bessemer alabama capital punishment smith v state heflin alabama Malone v State dekalb county alabama foley alabama making a murderer prostitution sting self defense public assistance fraud decatur alabama Fentanyl brendan dassey mulga alabama brian fredick lucas 28 U.S.C. § 2254 operation bullseye alfonso morris fraudulent checks kenneth eugene billups steve avery animal cruelty npr arson st clair county alabama drug activity russell calhoun eric sterling asia mcclain capital murder West Alabama SCOTUS, mountain brook alabama fort payne alabama moving violations mccalla alabama department of justice, court of criminal appeals Thomas Hardiman second amendment huntsville birchfield v north dakota hanceville alabama pruitt v state death penalty mcwilliams v dunn debtor prison 2016 election, Joshua Reese social media boaz alabama birmingham alabama Tracie Todd drug busts edwards v arizona heritage christian university fourth amendment shooting nicholas hawkins bailey v us bernard v north dakota eugene lee jones v state Adamsville alabama cullman alabama Hillary Clinton, clarence thomas gadsden alabama Eutaw Alabama Mike Hubbard Dylann Roof LWOP executions marion county utah supreme court shelby county blount county alabama tuscaloosa alabama Marengo County Alabama tarrant alabama morgan county alabama hurst v florida brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix shoplifting sixth amendment avondale alabama apprendi v new jersey christmas shooting fultondale alabama moore v texas OJ Simpson Made in America criminal justice reform, jerry bohannon alabama law enforcement agency Jefferson County Alabama Rule 32 drug seizure Wesley Adam Whitworth embezzlement talladega superspeedway trussville alabama Walker County Alabama court systems, hoax destructive devices mike gilotti fake kidnapping, blountsville alabama lauderdale county alabama concealed carry homicide christian guitierez beylund v north dakota legende v state Lucky D Arcade alabama supreme court attempted murder baltimore city circuit court minor offenses netflix warrantless blood draws judicial override abuse Alabaster alabama hall v florida ake v oklahoma Etowah County Alabama, US Supreme Court Update springville alabama implied consent florence alabama Easter dora alabama Glaze v State Samuel Alito south carolina anniston alabama, huntsville alabama state of alabama capital offenses death penalty, betton v state road rage kimberly alabama sheffield v state pell city alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing negligent homicide Shonda Walker, mount olive alabama § 13A-3-23 abandonment illegal gambling eighth amendment, oneonta alabama greene county alabama Benn v State fraud shooting death gun rights ring v arizona eleventh circuit ruling calhoun county alabama endangerment of a child alabama Gardendale Alabama Neil Gorsuch sarah koenig illegal gun carry hurst mandamus benjamin todd acton fairfield alabama, alabama criminal law roundup state of arizona New York Times identity theft Briarwood Presbyterian Church Pleasant Grove Alabama Guy Terrell Junior narcotics investigation battles v state street racing drug possession, robberies Kareem Dacar Gaymon assault midazolam stoves v state cherokee county alabama felony assaults john earle redfearn IV v state criminal mischief constitutional law, pelham alabama Ingmire v State banville v state crime of passion Donald Trump, underage drinking hoover alabama debit card skimming scams drug crimes warrior alabama domestic violence aziz sayyed maryland court of special appeals brookside alabama pinson alabama lethal injection drugs morris alabama constitutional violations towles v state lamar county operation crackdown dothan alabama kidnapping albertville alabama levins v state parole terell corey mcmullin ferguson missouri court of criminal appeal releases abduction utah v strieff Woods v State nathan woods ex parte briseno William Pryor scotus department of justice armed robbery sentencing law and policy blog summaries CCA update Sardis Alabama

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.