CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Adnan Syed of "Serial" Granted New Trial

J.D. Lloyd - Thursday, March 29, 2018

(Image Credit: Getty Images)


In the ongoing case of Adnan Syed, made famous by NPR's "Serial" podcast, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals has ruled in Adnan's favor and has ordered that he be granted a new trial. In a long decision, the Court determined that Adnan's trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to investigate Asia McClain, a witness who purportedly could have provided Adnan with a crucial alibi for the window of time he was allegedly killing Hae Min Lee in a Best Buy parking lot.



The case was on appeal by both Adnan and the State of Maryland. In the Baltimore City Circuit Court, Adnan had been granted a new trial based upon counsel's failure to question the State's cell phone tower data expert about a warning on a fax cover sheet to the data that warned about the data's unreliability. The circuit court had rejected the claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate Asia. Both sides appealed their adverse rulings.


And both sides won. The Court of Special Appeals reached the opposite conclusions than that of the Baltimore City Circuit Court. The Court found the circuit court was wrong to grant Adnan relief on the fax cover sheet issue, but was also wrong to deny relief based on counsel's failure to investigate Asia's alibi. The Court explained:
McClain’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, would have made it impossible for Syed to have murdered Hae. Trial counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced Syed’s defense, because, but for trial counsel’s failure to investigate, there is a reasonable probability that McClain’s alibi testimony would have raised a reasonable doubt in the mind of at least one juror about Syed’s involvement Hae’s murder, and thus “the result of the proceedings would have been different."


When you're complaining that your trial counsel screwed up and denied you your Sixth Amendment right to effective representation, you have to show two things: (1) that some error occurred, and (2) that the error prejudiced you in a way that calls the results of the case into question. You have to show a "reasonable probability" that the results of trial would have been different. You don't have to prove innocence (it helps), but you've got to show more than just "this hurt my case." Here, it's easy to see how a jury could have believed an alibi about Adnan's whereabouts. There was no definitive evidence about where he was -- just circumstantial evidence that was dubious.


I don't practice in Maryland and am not well-versed in Maryland appellate procedure, but it looks like the State (or Adnan) might ask a higher court -- the Maryland Court of Appeals -- to review the decision. It doesn't look like either side has a right to appeal to this court and would have to ask for that court to review.


Like you, I'm anxiously awaiting a Sarah Koenig update...


Recent Posts


peyton pruitt strickland v washington death penalty, constitutional violations Gardendale Alabama § 13A-3-23 utah supreme court hanceville alabama ring v arizona Hillary Clinton, concealed carry st clair county alabama state of alabama calhoun county alabama executions second amendment theft making a murderer sentencing law and policy blog summaries Pleasant Grove Alabama campbell v state theft of property Dylann Roof foley alabama drug busts underage drinking brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix greene county alabama death penalty morris alabama fort payne alabama alabama criminal law roundup bessemer alabama hurst mandamus endangerment of a child self defense Tommy Arthur aiding and abetting Mike Hubbard mountain brook alabama apprendi v new jersey illegal gambling domestic violence state of arizona judicial override department of justice baltimore city circuit court texas Donald Trump, § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing economic growth heflin alabama New York Times lauderdale county alabama LWOP Xavier Beasley 28 U.S.C. § 2254 birchfield v north dakota homicide rate eric sterling crime of passion West Alabama criminal justice social media Tracie Todd arson mobile alabama alfonso morris legende v state criminal mischief car accident smith v state William Pryor Alonzo Ephraim Shonda Walker, anniston alabama, Glaze v State huntsville alabama capital offenses cullman alabama shooting bomb threat fultondale alabama dekalb county alabama marion county Fentanyl madison alabama implied consent burglary attempted murder midazolam US Supreme Court Update hoax destructive devices shoplifting Stephen Breyer court of criminal appeal releases drug trafficking, parole Easter stanley brent chapman eighth amendment, ex parte briseno narcotics investigation home repair fraud homicide brian fredick lucas Guy Terrell Junior Jefferson County Alabama Kay Ivey mike gilotti levins v state Marengo County Alabama animal cruelty shooting death abandonment Justice Sotomayor Etowah County Alabama, dora alabama gun rights adnan syed, brookside alabama warrantless blood draws warrior alabama aziz sayyed pell city alabama Malone v State mulga alabama alabama Neil Gorsuch oneonta alabama tarrant alabama russell calhoun breaking and entering illegal gun carry fairfield alabama, ake v oklahoma Lucky D Arcade the mannequin challenge fraud SCOTUS, sixth amendment heritage christian university banville v state pinson alabama blount county alabama drug seizure alabama supreme court birmingham alabama operation bullseye hall v florida battles v state lamar county pelham alabama sexual assault gun control domestic abuse fourth amendment lethal injection drug possession, mcwilliams v dunn betton v state Alabaster alabama mccalla alabama kidnapping fraudulent checks abuse Benn v State capital punishment terell corey mcmullin sheffield v state trussville alabama eugene lee jones v state cherokee county alabama keith v state editorial Samuel Alito court of criminal appeals christmas shooting fake kidnapping, Rule 32 mount olive alabama dothan alabama clarence thomas lethal injection drugs Joshua Reese debit card skimming scams benjamin todd acton identity theft kimberly alabama scotus montgomery alabama negligent homicide gadsden alabama department of justice, christian guitierez Walker County Alabama hurst v florida bailey v us morgan county alabama habeas corpus relief alabama law enforcement agency talladega superspeedway CCA update beylund v north dakota maryland court of special appeals Eutaw Alabama netflix limestone county alabama eleventh circuit ruling embezzlement robberies minor offenses steve avery rainbow city alabama road rage moving violations asia mcclain hoover alabama npr shelby county operation crackdown felony assaults ferguson missouri serial boaz alabama brady v maryland criminal justice reform, church robberies utah v strieff capital murder Wesley Adam Whitworth armed robbery Briarwood Presbyterian Church john earle redfearn IV v state kenneth eugene billups Ingmire v State drug crimes tuscaloosa alabama court systems, florence alabama Adamsville alabama nicholas hawkins huntsville baldwin county alabama bernard v north dakota constitutional law, brendan dassey Thomas Hardiman murder jerry bohannon stoves v state OJ Simpson debtor prison decatur alabama albertville alabama adger alabama prostitution sting pruitt v state Sardis Alabama OJ Simpson Made in America drug activity abduction street racing assault sarah koenig edwards v arizona avondale alabama 2016 election, springville alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon blountsville alabama forced isolation unlawful manufacturing nathan woods public assistance fraud moore v texas Woods v State drug smuggling towles v state south carolina



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.