CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Adnan Syed of "Serial" Granted New Trial

J.D. Lloyd - Thursday, March 29, 2018

(Image Credit: Getty Images)


In the ongoing case of Adnan Syed, made famous by NPR's "Serial" podcast, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals has ruled in Adnan's favor and has ordered that he be granted a new trial. In a long decision, the Court determined that Adnan's trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to investigate Asia McClain, a witness who purportedly could have provided Adnan with a crucial alibi for the window of time he was allegedly killing Hae Min Lee in a Best Buy parking lot.



The case was on appeal by both Adnan and the State of Maryland. In the Baltimore City Circuit Court, Adnan had been granted a new trial based upon counsel's failure to question the State's cell phone tower data expert about a warning on a fax cover sheet to the data that warned about the data's unreliability. The circuit court had rejected the claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate Asia. Both sides appealed their adverse rulings.


And both sides won. The Court of Special Appeals reached the opposite conclusions than that of the Baltimore City Circuit Court. The Court found the circuit court was wrong to grant Adnan relief on the fax cover sheet issue, but was also wrong to deny relief based on counsel's failure to investigate Asia's alibi. The Court explained:
McClain’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, would have made it impossible for Syed to have murdered Hae. Trial counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced Syed’s defense, because, but for trial counsel’s failure to investigate, there is a reasonable probability that McClain’s alibi testimony would have raised a reasonable doubt in the mind of at least one juror about Syed’s involvement Hae’s murder, and thus “the result of the proceedings would have been different."


When you're complaining that your trial counsel screwed up and denied you your Sixth Amendment right to effective representation, you have to show two things: (1) that some error occurred, and (2) that the error prejudiced you in a way that calls the results of the case into question. You have to show a "reasonable probability" that the results of trial would have been different. You don't have to prove innocence (it helps), but you've got to show more than just "this hurt my case." Here, it's easy to see how a jury could have believed an alibi about Adnan's whereabouts. There was no definitive evidence about where he was -- just circumstantial evidence that was dubious.


I don't practice in Maryland and am not well-versed in Maryland appellate procedure, but it looks like the State (or Adnan) might ask a higher court -- the Maryland Court of Appeals -- to review the decision. It doesn't look like either side has a right to appeal to this court and would have to ask for that court to review.


Like you, I'm anxiously awaiting a Sarah Koenig update...


Recent Posts


crime of passion negligent homicide sexual assault Tracie Todd Xavier Beasley Malone v State abandonment drug seizure OJ Simpson Made in America st clair county alabama narcotics investigation midazolam shelby county 28 U.S.C. § 2254 pell city alabama making a murderer benjamin todd acton department of justice, Wesley Adam Whitworth eleventh circuit ruling apprendi v new jersey Kareem Dacar Gaymon warrior alabama blountsville alabama state of arizona operation crackdown hurst mandamus Dylann Roof legende v state West Alabama fraud Donald Trump, gun rights dothan alabama endangerment of a child implied consent Samuel Alito trussville alabama fort payne alabama Tommy Arthur brendan dassey constitutional violations Benn v State theft heritage christian university William Pryor campbell v state decatur alabama boaz alabama aiding and abetting abuse debtor prison fourth amendment US Supreme Court Update kenneth eugene billups debit card skimming scams alfonso morris Rule 32 Mike Hubbard Kay Ivey parole Fentanyl brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix madison alabama brady v maryland executions rainbow city alabama robberies brian fredick lucas clarence thomas drug crimes social media Thomas Hardiman texas shooting dora alabama criminal justice florence alabama Easter south carolina shoplifting eric sterling ring v arizona morgan county alabama bailey v us home repair fraud capital offenses sentencing law and policy blog summaries shooting death calhoun county alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama fraudulent checks lamar county levins v state nathan woods peyton pruitt tarrant alabama smith v state dekalb county alabama forced isolation alabama supreme court Jefferson County Alabama blount county alabama gun control brookside alabama court systems, unlawful manufacturing warrantless blood draws gadsden alabama moore v texas bernard v north dakota baldwin county alabama baltimore city circuit court stoves v state SCOTUS, drug smuggling arson death penalty, criminal mischief homicide rate aziz sayyed Glaze v State court of criminal appeals § 13A-3-23 utah supreme court OJ Simpson concealed carry church robberies hanceville alabama hurst v florida domestic violence department of justice asia mcclain drug activity felony assaults Neil Gorsuch identity theft anniston alabama, lauderdale county alabama foley alabama murder greene county alabama illegal gambling cullman alabama criminal justice reform, state of alabama illegal gun carry breaking and entering kimberly alabama abduction fairfield alabama, burglary serial ex parte briseno lethal injection montgomery alabama springville alabama oneonta alabama sheffield v state theft of property fake kidnapping, albertville alabama christian guitierez netflix Gardendale Alabama jerry bohannon constitutional law, eugene lee jones v state mccalla alabama drug trafficking, ferguson missouri Joshua Reese alabama criminal law roundup lethal injection drugs Woods v State animal cruelty Hillary Clinton, eighth amendment, mount olive alabama road rage operation bullseye habeas corpus relief hoover alabama LWOP New York Times underage drinking birmingham alabama Sardis Alabama Etowah County Alabama, birchfield v north dakota huntsville alabama terell corey mcmullin 2016 election, alabama law enforcement agency sixth amendment Lucky D Arcade Adamsville alabama huntsville pruitt v state mountain brook alabama drug possession, second amendment domestic abuse towles v state bessemer alabama mobile alabama maryland court of special appeals economic growth russell calhoun heflin alabama capital murder fultondale alabama Alabaster alabama Shonda Walker, Stephen Breyer pelham alabama editorial battles v state mcwilliams v dunn keith v state mike gilotti hoax destructive devices self defense scotus death penalty alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church Marengo County Alabama morris alabama Ingmire v State steve avery Guy Terrell Junior mulga alabama Justice Sotomayor public assistance fraud marion county Walker County Alabama street racing adnan syed, adger alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing stanley brent chapman strickland v washington embezzlement tuscaloosa alabama car accident Eutaw Alabama utah v strieff beylund v north dakota homicide CCA update the mannequin challenge avondale alabama betton v state armed robbery moving violations minor offenses capital punishment npr drug busts pinson alabama ake v oklahoma attempted murder edwards v arizona nicholas hawkins john earle redfearn IV v state prostitution sting court of criminal appeal releases kidnapping sarah koenig christmas shooting bomb threat Alonzo Ephraim banville v state judicial override talladega superspeedway hall v florida limestone county alabama cherokee county alabama assault



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.