CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Adnan Syed of "Serial" Granted New Trial

J.D. Lloyd - Thursday, March 29, 2018

(Image Credit: Getty Images)


In the ongoing case of Adnan Syed, made famous by NPR's "Serial" podcast, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals has ruled in Adnan's favor and has ordered that he be granted a new trial. In a long decision, the Court determined that Adnan's trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to investigate Asia McClain, a witness who purportedly could have provided Adnan with a crucial alibi for the window of time he was allegedly killing Hae Min Lee in a Best Buy parking lot.



The case was on appeal by both Adnan and the State of Maryland. In the Baltimore City Circuit Court, Adnan had been granted a new trial based upon counsel's failure to question the State's cell phone tower data expert about a warning on a fax cover sheet to the data that warned about the data's unreliability. The circuit court had rejected the claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate Asia. Both sides appealed their adverse rulings.


And both sides won. The Court of Special Appeals reached the opposite conclusions than that of the Baltimore City Circuit Court. The Court found the circuit court was wrong to grant Adnan relief on the fax cover sheet issue, but was also wrong to deny relief based on counsel's failure to investigate Asia's alibi. The Court explained:
McClain’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, would have made it impossible for Syed to have murdered Hae. Trial counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced Syed’s defense, because, but for trial counsel’s failure to investigate, there is a reasonable probability that McClain’s alibi testimony would have raised a reasonable doubt in the mind of at least one juror about Syed’s involvement Hae’s murder, and thus “the result of the proceedings would have been different."


When you're complaining that your trial counsel screwed up and denied you your Sixth Amendment right to effective representation, you have to show two things: (1) that some error occurred, and (2) that the error prejudiced you in a way that calls the results of the case into question. You have to show a "reasonable probability" that the results of trial would have been different. You don't have to prove innocence (it helps), but you've got to show more than just "this hurt my case." Here, it's easy to see how a jury could have believed an alibi about Adnan's whereabouts. There was no definitive evidence about where he was -- just circumstantial evidence that was dubious.


I don't practice in Maryland and am not well-versed in Maryland appellate procedure, but it looks like the State (or Adnan) might ask a higher court -- the Maryland Court of Appeals -- to review the decision. It doesn't look like either side has a right to appeal to this court and would have to ask for that court to review.


Like you, I'm anxiously awaiting a Sarah Koenig update...


Recent Posts


warrior alabama serial sheffield v state limestone county alabama mccalla alabama illegal gambling eugene lee jones v state huntsville jerry bohannon hurst v florida Ingmire v State Donald Trump, alabama operation crackdown breaking and entering court of criminal appeals hoover alabama domestic violence habeas corpus relief mike gilotti stanley brent chapman russell calhoun hoax destructive devices blount county alabama capital offenses texas baldwin county alabama road rage pell city alabama gadsden alabama mobile alabama pinson alabama constitutional violations bailey v us home repair fraud talladega superspeedway foley alabama ring v arizona Wesley Adam Whitworth rainbow city alabama levins v state constitutional law, shooting eric sterling concealed carry underage drinking economic growth nicholas hawkins fourth amendment public assistance fraud pelham alabama Shonda Walker, hanceville alabama Thomas Hardiman criminal justice reform, sixth amendment animal cruelty Fentanyl social media sarah koenig death penalty, ex parte briseno capital punishment Dylann Roof birchfield v north dakota birmingham alabama drug busts Marengo County Alabama death penalty Hillary Clinton, brady v maryland shooting death christmas shooting adnan syed, blountsville alabama Jefferson County Alabama second amendment aiding and abetting negligent homicide fraud Glaze v State theft Malone v State abduction alfonso morris eleventh circuit ruling montgomery alabama Mike Hubbard anniston alabama, illegal gun carry dora alabama William Pryor self defense editorial West Alabama minor offenses Tommy Arthur debtor prison calhoun county alabama heritage christian university fort payne alabama moore v texas warrantless blood draws the mannequin challenge state of arizona armed robbery Joshua Reese Stephen Breyer beylund v north dakota Etowah County Alabama, kimberly alabama unlawful manufacturing criminal justice 2016 election, § 13A-3-23 dothan alabama sentencing law and policy blog summaries drug crimes car accident decatur alabama sexual assault operation bullseye homicide rate LWOP domestic abuse brookside alabama Neil Gorsuch alabama supreme court Woods v State edwards v arizona capital murder nathan woods New York Times Rule 32 towles v state shoplifting springville alabama making a murderer apprendi v new jersey endangerment of a child kenneth eugene billups shelby county terell corey mcmullin st clair county alabama abandonment Alonzo Ephraim morgan county alabama drug seizure legende v state adger alabama scotus debit card skimming scams arson tuscaloosa alabama steve avery bomb threat benjamin todd acton Walker County Alabama parole battles v state morris alabama heflin alabama crime of passion gun rights narcotics investigation eighth amendment, US Supreme Court Update fraudulent checks Samuel Alito banville v state Briarwood Presbyterian Church ferguson missouri Lucky D Arcade dekalb county alabama asia mcclain Tracie Todd bessemer alabama brendan dassey baltimore city circuit court CCA update Kay Ivey hurst mandamus OJ Simpson Made in America kidnapping mulga alabama mount olive alabama bernard v north dakota department of justice betton v state Xavier Beasley pruitt v state § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing prostitution sting brian fredick lucas alabama criminal law roundup identity theft OJ Simpson john earle redfearn IV v state trussville alabama boaz alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama netflix madison alabama Guy Terrell Junior mcwilliams v dunn cullman alabama state of alabama murder court systems, drug activity abuse south carolina strickland v washington albertville alabama huntsville alabama ake v oklahoma keith v state lethal injection drugs Easter theft of property hall v florida department of justice, implied consent maryland court of special appeals street racing lamar county midazolam robberies fake kidnapping, florence alabama drug trafficking, forced isolation avondale alabama Alabaster alabama utah v strieff embezzlement Kareem Dacar Gaymon moving violations lauderdale county alabama marion county court of criminal appeal releases drug smuggling assault peyton pruitt campbell v state aziz sayyed christian guitierez fultondale alabama Adamsville alabama criminal mischief homicide Benn v State gun control 28 U.S.C. § 2254 greene county alabama npr Justice Sotomayor brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix executions smith v state lethal injection Gardendale Alabama stoves v state judicial override felony assaults clarence thomas church robberies attempted murder utah supreme court fairfield alabama, SCOTUS, tarrant alabama cherokee county alabama drug possession, alabama law enforcement agency mountain brook alabama burglary Sardis Alabama oneonta alabama Eutaw Alabama



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.