CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.


J.D. Lloyd - Friday, May 06, 2016

Eugene Lee Jones v. State (CR-14-1332)


Jones was convicted of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder, stemming from him killing a woman he suspected of setting him up in a robbery. Jones voluntarily talked to investigators on July 29, 2013, in connection to the death, but eventually stopped the questioning when he invoked his right to counsel. Jones was arrested on an outstanding warrant out of Bessemer. Jones was eventually transported back to Lauderdale County on another warrant stemming from a charge unrelated to the homicide. While still in custody, Jones was asked to submit to a polygraph examination. Jones waived his Miranda rights, submitted to the polygraph, and subsequently made another statement in which he admitted that he strangled the victim. Jones moved to suppress this statement under Edwards v. AZ, 451 US 477 (1981) on the grounds that investigators improperly re-initiated contact after he had invoked his right to counsel. The circuit court denied the motion. AFFIRMED. Relying on MD v. Shatzer, 559 US 98 (2010), the CCA affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress on the grounds that “coercive effect” of re-initiation of interrogation wasn’t present in this case like it was in Edwards. Essentially, the Court held that if enough time has passed since the initial invocation of the right to counsel -- more than 14 days -- there is no presumptively problematic re-initiation as there was in Edwards.


Levins v. State (CR-15-0612)


Bell v. State (CR-15-0618)

The appellants in these two cases were two expungement petitioners who were denied relief at the circuit court level and asked the CCA to reverse the denials of their petitions. APPEALS DISMISSED One may only challenge the denial of their expungement petition by petitioning the Alabama Supreme Court for certiorari review of the denial of the petition for expungement.

John Earle Redfearn, IV v. State (CR-14-0500)


This case involved the denial of a motion to suppress drugs evidence recovered from Redfearn’s body. In February 2012, law enforcement obtained a search warrant of Redfearn’s residence based upon 2 controlled buys that occurred at the residence with Redfearn. Law enforcement executed the SW after they observed Redfearn drive away from the house. He was stopped several miles away while the search of the house was going on and taken back to the house by the detaining officers. While executing the warrant, Redfearn’s girlfriend arrived at the house and eventually told the officers that Redfearn keeps drugs on his person. An officer strip-searched Redfearn at the residence and recovered a bottle containing oxycodone pills in his underwear. Redfearn moved to suppress under Bailey v. US, 133 S.Ct. 1031 (2013). AFFIRMED. The CCA explained that while Bailey held that a suspect may be lawfully detained while police are conducting a search warrant only when the person is in the "immediate vicinity" of the place to be searched, Redfearn was properly detained because the police had probable cause to arrest him based upon the controlled buys previously carried out with Redfearn and observed by law enforcement.


Nathaniel Woods (CR-10-0695)

Alfonso Morris (CR-11-1925)

John Russell Calhoun (CR-14-0779)

In these three cases, the CCA affirmed the denial of Rule 32 relief for death-row inmates without holding evidentiary hearings. There’s not much that’s noteworthy in these opinions outside of the observation that the petitions were summarily denied because each petitioner failed to plead sufficient facts that, if proven true, could entitle them to relief. The vast majority of the factual claims in the three petitions were bare-boned factual allegations. In Woods and Morris, petitioners raised claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present certain expert testimony at trial. The CCA affirmed the summary dismissal of these claims because the petitioner failed to identify an expert and what that expert’s testimony would have been at the pleading stage. It bears repeating that if you’re going to raise an IAC claim, in order to be entitled to a hearing, you have to give the circuit court sufficient factual allegations that the court can conclude that your claims could entitle you to relief if proven true. In the context of IAC based on the failure to call certain expert witnesses, you need to make a proffer as to who that expert would have been and what the testimony would have been at the pleading stage.


Brian Fredick Lucas (CR-14-0744)


Lucas was convicted of first-degree attempted sodomy by forcible compulsion and first-degree sexual abuse stemming from an incident in which he allegedly touched his step-daughter on the mouth with his penis while she was sleeping. The CCA reversed his first-degree sodomy conviction on the grounds that the State’s showing did not present evidence of forcible compulsion -- there was no threat by Lucas or evidence that his actions overcame her earnest resistance. The CCA did enter a judgment convicting Lucas of attempted sexual misconduct.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


§ 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing Alabaster alabama greene county alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix debit card skimming scams aiding and abetting dekalb county alabama Guy Terrell Junior alabama supreme court burglary negligent homicide mobile alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama § 13A-3-23 unlawful manufacturing anniston alabama, hall v florida nicholas hawkins Gardendale Alabama Dylann Roof Neil Gorsuch florence alabama springville alabama Justice Sotomayor Kay Ivey Jefferson County Alabama birchfield v north dakota beylund v north dakota gadsden alabama peyton pruitt mcwilliams v dunn Joshua Reese alfonso morris baldwin county alabama adnan syed, mccalla alabama implied consent prostitution sting Wesley Adam Whitworth fourth amendment church robberies Samuel Alito tuscaloosa alabama oneonta alabama npr eugene lee jones v state department of justice, heritage christian university hurst mandamus Mike Hubbard 2016 election, mountain brook alabama court of criminal appeals state of alabama aziz sayyed criminal mischief death penalty, shoplifting making a murderer maryland court of special appeals habeas corpus relief asia mcclain pelham alabama crime of passion sheffield v state New York Times tarrant alabama minor offenses Thomas Hardiman capital offenses concealed carry criminal justice public assistance fraud Glaze v State stoves v state abduction robberies boaz alabama criminal justice reform, sixth amendment lethal injection embezzlement shooting forced isolation SCOTUS, hoover alabama huntsville scotus serial Kareem Dacar Gaymon social media eighth amendment, hanceville alabama levins v state terell corey mcmullin theft Rule 32 identity theft street racing banville v state alabama fake kidnapping, domestic violence felony assaults theft of property capital punishment dothan alabama drug crimes Shonda Walker, brady v maryland lamar county underage drinking warrantless blood draws fairfield alabama, marion county court of criminal appeal releases south carolina second amendment birmingham alabama abandonment decatur alabama home repair fraud limestone county alabama mount olive alabama mulga alabama Woods v State brendan dassey homicide arson clarence thomas christmas shooting madison alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 fort payne alabama sarah koenig avondale alabama court systems, Eutaw Alabama jerry bohannon assault kimberly alabama ex parte briseno trussville alabama rainbow city alabama murder constitutional law, st clair county alabama fultondale alabama West Alabama calhoun county alabama homicide rate towles v state steve avery dora alabama christian guitierez car accident pinson alabama montgomery alabama battles v state Walker County Alabama talladega superspeedway bernard v north dakota ring v arizona benjamin todd acton shelby county stanley brent chapman eleventh circuit ruling gun control bessemer alabama constitutional violations Fentanyl domestic abuse keith v state fraudulent checks drug smuggling betton v state Briarwood Presbyterian Church Adamsville alabama bomb threat Etowah County Alabama, moore v texas self defense foley alabama debtor prison gun rights pruitt v state operation bullseye netflix apprendi v new jersey warrior alabama john earle redfearn IV v state russell calhoun state of arizona brookside alabama sexual assault huntsville alabama death penalty blountsville alabama Xavier Beasley heflin alabama lethal injection drugs mike gilotti kidnapping Tracie Todd Donald Trump, legende v state moving violations nathan woods baltimore city circuit court shooting death fraud narcotics investigation CCA update Tommy Arthur Ingmire v State abuse Easter drug busts Stephen Breyer drug activity cullman alabama Benn v State campbell v state midazolam OJ Simpson sentencing law and policy blog summaries texas Lucky D Arcade adger alabama judicial override blount county alabama breaking and entering Alonzo Ephraim kenneth eugene billups cherokee county alabama animal cruelty Sardis Alabama alabama criminal law roundup OJ Simpson Made in America illegal gambling bailey v us drug possession, editorial ake v oklahoma endangerment of a child hoax destructive devices parole edwards v arizona smith v state ferguson missouri Malone v State pell city alabama Hillary Clinton, albertville alabama capital murder department of justice drug trafficking, illegal gun carry William Pryor eric sterling operation crackdown morgan county alabama lauderdale county alabama strickland v washington US Supreme Court Update utah supreme court attempted murder executions economic growth brian fredick lucas morris alabama Marengo County Alabama alabama law enforcement agency drug seizure utah v strieff the mannequin challenge armed robbery hurst v florida LWOP road rage



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.