CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeals Decisions - April 2018

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, April 27, 2018

 Pruitt v. State 16-0956

 

 

Pruitt pleaded guilty to two counts of committing a sex act with a student, violations of § 13A-6-81, and two counts of distributing obscene material to a minor, violations of § 13A-12-200.5. These offenses involved 3 students Pruitt formerly taught. Pruitt was a teacher in the Blount County School system. She taught at the Locust Fork High School during the 2012-13 and 2013-14 school years. She taught the three students during this time. Beginning in the 2014-15 school year, Pruitt was transferred to Appalachian High School. During October 2014, she sent Student #1 nude Snapchat pictures, had deviate sexual intercourse with Student #2, and had sexual intercourse with Student #3. For all intents and purposes, the acts were consensual. These facts were stipulated by both sides. Prior to pleading guilty, Pruitt, relying on Lawrence v. Texas, argued that the statutes and charges were unconstitutional as applied to her. AFFIRMED The Court of Criminal Appeals rejected the Lawrence-based argument on the grounds that Lawrence explicitly held that the decision didn’t apply to conduct involving minors. Further, the Court concluded that the State has a legitimate state interest in “prohibiting intimate contact between a teacher and a student.” The Court likewise rejected Pruitt’s “consent” defense since the statute expressly says “consent is not a defense.” Finally, the Court held that the fact that Pruitt did not teach at the same school as the students did not entitle her to relief. The Court also rejected an argument that her violation for unlawful distribution of obscene material to a minor didn’t violate her right to Equal Protection to be free from State intervention in a private relationship with a consulting person. The Court ruled against this argument based on the student being a minor (per § 13A-12-200.1) and previous holdings that the State doesn’t violate Equal Protection concerns by prohibiting sexual contact with minors.
 
Towles v. State CR-15-0699
Towles was convicted of capital murder pursuant to §13A-5-40(a)(15) for killing his girlfriend’s son by hitting him on the buttocks with a piece of lumber. This appealed stemmed from a re-trial after the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed his capital murder conviction and death sentence years back. In the interim, Towles’ girlfriend pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. The girlfriend didn’t testify at trial. Towles’ defense was that she caused the death and then blackmailed him to help her cover up the child’s death. However, the State impeached Towles by discussing how she had pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. REVERSED The Court concluded that the introduction of the girlfriend’s conviction into evidence was improper evidence of Towles’ guilt. The Court also concluded that the trial court’s instruction that “knowledge of the probability of death or great bodily harm is sufficient to constitute murder” impermissibly lessened the State’s burden and undermined the defense’s argument that the killing was, at most, unintentional. Mr. Towles will now go back for his third trial.

 

Betton v. State CR-15-1501
Betton was a juvenile capital defendant seeking re-sentencing under Miller v. Alabama. Here, the circuit court re-sentenced him to LWOP without considering the factors the Alabama Supreme Court announced in Ex parte Henderson. REMANDED The Court held that remand was necessary for the circuit court to enter specific findings under Ex parte Henderson.
 
Battles v. State CR-17-0044
In a prosecution for unlawful possession of a pistol by a forbidden person pursuant to § 13A-11-72(a), Battles waived counsel and represented himself at trial. However, throughout, Battles complained that he didn’t understand the charges against him and complained that he didn’t have the resources necessary to defend his case. REVERSED The Court concluded that while Battles knowingly waived his right to represent himself at trial, the circuit court failed to the factors a court must discuss with a defendant pursuant to Fitzpatrick v. Wainwright, 800 F. 2d 1057 (11th Cir. 1986) and Tomlin v. State, 601 So. 2d 124 (Ala. 1991). Additionally, the court failed to tell Battles he could withdraw the waiver at any time.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

2016 election, tuscaloosa alabama battles v state judicial override drug smuggling capital murder utah v strieff court of criminal appeals strickland v washington crime of passion US Supreme Court Update narcotics investigation adger alabama Dylann Roof road rage dothan alabama Etowah County Alabama, mountain brook alabama boaz alabama illegal gun carry rainbow city alabama brookside alabama huntsville alabama pruitt v state criminal justice criminal mischief baltimore city circuit court assault greene county alabama talladega superspeedway drug trafficking, constitutional law, lethal injection drugs shooting Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, Kareem Dacar Gaymon fort payne alabama executions keith v state moore v texas dekalb county alabama drug busts state of arizona texas heflin alabama avondale alabama oneonta alabama edwards v arizona death penalty, minor offenses trussville alabama murder Tommy Arthur car accident illegal gambling 28 U.S.C. § 2254 foley alabama Walker County Alabama mulga alabama alabama law enforcement agency hall v florida morris alabama operation bullseye theft of property eleventh circuit ruling pinson alabama lamar county brady v maryland baldwin county alabama parole robberies eugene lee jones v state bessemer alabama maryland court of special appeals arson operation crackdown Tracie Todd capital punishment gun rights scotus madison alabama capital offenses debit card skimming scams drug seizure church robberies Benn v State kenneth eugene billups Adamsville alabama homicide rate nicholas hawkins fultondale alabama ferguson missouri making a murderer Guy Terrell Junior alabama criminal law roundup limestone county alabama adnan syed, legende v state endangerment of a child Gardendale Alabama Marengo County Alabama apprendi v new jersey embezzlement moving violations court systems, blount county alabama kimberly alabama terell corey mcmullin montgomery alabama birmingham alabama constitutional violations department of justice, Xavier Beasley lethal injection serial Thomas Hardiman fairfield alabama, drug possession, felony assaults mount olive alabama ake v oklahoma alfonso morris OJ Simpson Made in America LWOP prostitution sting Eutaw Alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth domestic violence springville alabama st clair county alabama Sardis Alabama theft burglary Alonzo Ephraim fraudulent checks economic growth npr sixth amendment death penalty asia mcclain decatur alabama alabama OJ Simpson christian guitierez anniston alabama, beylund v north dakota fourth amendment domestic abuse the mannequin challenge abandonment home repair fraud Woods v State pell city alabama hurst mandamus bomb threat hurst v florida netflix birchfield v north dakota alabama supreme court identity theft animal cruelty SCOTUS, sheffield v state Briarwood Presbyterian Church public assistance fraud court of criminal appeal releases benjamin todd acton morgan county alabama ring v arizona underage drinking betton v state dora alabama albertville alabama ex parte briseno christmas shooting Alabaster alabama smith v state street racing concealed carry criminal justice reform, towles v state CCA update Kay Ivey fraud hoax destructive devices debtor prison midazolam habeas corpus relief utah supreme court heritage christian university calhoun county alabama breaking and entering homicide attempted murder armed robbery Stephen Breyer eighth amendment, Jefferson County Alabama stoves v state florence alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing warrantless blood draws south carolina brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix Mike Hubbard bailey v us Neil Gorsuch aziz sayyed shoplifting Samuel Alito shooting death West Alabama banville v state implied consent fake kidnapping, pelham alabama editorial john earle redfearn IV v state forced isolation abduction shelby county sexual assault blountsville alabama mccalla alabama peyton pruitt Easter tarrant alabama hoover alabama Fentanyl negligent homicide Shonda Walker, Malone v State Rule 32 self defense jerry bohannon russell calhoun brian fredick lucas hanceville alabama cullman alabama Lucky D Arcade brendan dassey sentencing law and policy blog summaries William Pryor warrior alabama gadsden alabama New York Times sarah koenig § 13A-3-23 clarence thomas mobile alabama unlawful manufacturing Glaze v State mcwilliams v dunn Ingmire v State aiding and abetting eric sterling levins v state drug activity campbell v state kidnapping state of alabama nathan woods cherokee county alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama abuse drug crimes department of justice steve avery stanley brent chapman Joshua Reese gun control bernard v north dakota huntsville social media marion county mike gilotti second amendment lauderdale county alabama Justice Sotomayor

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.