CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeals Decisions - April 2018

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, April 27, 2018

 Pruitt v. State 16-0956

 

 

Pruitt pleaded guilty to two counts of committing a sex act with a student, violations of § 13A-6-81, and two counts of distributing obscene material to a minor, violations of § 13A-12-200.5. These offenses involved 3 students Pruitt formerly taught. Pruitt was a teacher in the Blount County School system. She taught at the Locust Fork High School during the 2012-13 and 2013-14 school years. She taught the three students during this time. Beginning in the 2014-15 school year, Pruitt was transferred to Appalachian High School. During October 2014, she sent Student #1 nude Snapchat pictures, had deviate sexual intercourse with Student #2, and had sexual intercourse with Student #3. For all intents and purposes, the acts were consensual. These facts were stipulated by both sides. Prior to pleading guilty, Pruitt, relying on Lawrence v. Texas, argued that the statutes and charges were unconstitutional as applied to her. AFFIRMED The Court of Criminal Appeals rejected the Lawrence-based argument on the grounds that Lawrence explicitly held that the decision didn’t apply to conduct involving minors. Further, the Court concluded that the State has a legitimate state interest in “prohibiting intimate contact between a teacher and a student.” The Court likewise rejected Pruitt’s “consent” defense since the statute expressly says “consent is not a defense.” Finally, the Court held that the fact that Pruitt did not teach at the same school as the students did not entitle her to relief. The Court also rejected an argument that her violation for unlawful distribution of obscene material to a minor didn’t violate her right to Equal Protection to be free from State intervention in a private relationship with a consulting person. The Court ruled against this argument based on the student being a minor (per § 13A-12-200.1) and previous holdings that the State doesn’t violate Equal Protection concerns by prohibiting sexual contact with minors.
 
Towles v. State CR-15-0699
Towles was convicted of capital murder pursuant to §13A-5-40(a)(15) for killing his girlfriend’s son by hitting him on the buttocks with a piece of lumber. This appealed stemmed from a re-trial after the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed his capital murder conviction and death sentence years back. In the interim, Towles’ girlfriend pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. The girlfriend didn’t testify at trial. Towles’ defense was that she caused the death and then blackmailed him to help her cover up the child’s death. However, the State impeached Towles by discussing how she had pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. REVERSED The Court concluded that the introduction of the girlfriend’s conviction into evidence was improper evidence of Towles’ guilt. The Court also concluded that the trial court’s instruction that “knowledge of the probability of death or great bodily harm is sufficient to constitute murder” impermissibly lessened the State’s burden and undermined the defense’s argument that the killing was, at most, unintentional. Mr. Towles will now go back for his third trial.

 

Betton v. State CR-15-1501
Betton was a juvenile capital defendant seeking re-sentencing under Miller v. Alabama. Here, the circuit court re-sentenced him to LWOP without considering the factors the Alabama Supreme Court announced in Ex parte Henderson. REMANDED The Court held that remand was necessary for the circuit court to enter specific findings under Ex parte Henderson.
 
Battles v. State CR-17-0044
In a prosecution for unlawful possession of a pistol by a forbidden person pursuant to § 13A-11-72(a), Battles waived counsel and represented himself at trial. However, throughout, Battles complained that he didn’t understand the charges against him and complained that he didn’t have the resources necessary to defend his case. REVERSED The Court concluded that while Battles knowingly waived his right to represent himself at trial, the circuit court failed to the factors a court must discuss with a defendant pursuant to Fitzpatrick v. Wainwright, 800 F. 2d 1057 (11th Cir. 1986) and Tomlin v. State, 601 So. 2d 124 (Ala. 1991). Additionally, the court failed to tell Battles he could withdraw the waiver at any time.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

gun control shooting Tommy Arthur npr eighth amendment, homicide rate shelby county executions baltimore city circuit court shooting death Benn v State ex parte briseno fraud operation crackdown christmas shooting capital murder self defense jerry bohannon unlawful manufacturing breaking and entering § 13A-3-23 fort payne alabama second amendment brian fredick lucas talladega superspeedway abandonment embezzlement Hillary Clinton, parole sexual assault steve avery Lucky D Arcade mulga alabama arson drug trafficking, moving violations underage drinking alabama supreme court Alabaster alabama hanceville alabama capital offenses bernard v north dakota 2016 election, clarence thomas church robberies implied consent minor offenses illegal gambling albertville alabama Kay Ivey court systems, pinson alabama campbell v state rainbow city alabama LWOP CCA update editorial asia mcclain adger alabama hall v florida alabama utah v strieff criminal justice reform, Gardendale Alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church decatur alabama netflix Guy Terrell Junior fake kidnapping, mccalla alabama department of justice death penalty, john earle redfearn IV v state strickland v washington edwards v arizona brendan dassey moore v texas morris alabama marion county animal cruelty Donald Trump, capital punishment public assistance fraud criminal justice springville alabama scotus habeas corpus relief hurst v florida home repair fraud fairfield alabama, SCOTUS, eric sterling fraudulent checks armed robbery theft of property towles v state alabama law enforcement agency kimberly alabama legende v state drug crimes shoplifting court of criminal appeals drug activity banville v state lamar county morgan county alabama hurst mandamus brookside alabama bessemer alabama benjamin todd acton Fentanyl debtor prison mount olive alabama hoax destructive devices Pleasant Grove Alabama lethal injection drugs cherokee county alabama pruitt v state eugene lee jones v state huntsville alabama burglary mike gilotti nicholas hawkins road rage robberies Rule 32 apprendi v new jersey Kareem Dacar Gaymon endangerment of a child Stephen Breyer bomb threat lauderdale county alabama Marengo County Alabama Easter sheffield v state abduction blount county alabama Tracie Todd pell city alabama US Supreme Court Update abuse warrantless blood draws drug possession, hoover alabama maryland court of special appeals lethal injection New York Times sixth amendment judicial override Woods v State oneonta alabama the mannequin challenge stoves v state huntsville drug smuggling Jefferson County Alabama sarah koenig Samuel Alito Sardis Alabama constitutional violations anniston alabama, criminal mischief OJ Simpson Made in America Eutaw Alabama identity theft state of arizona drug busts theft domestic violence economic growth russell calhoun domestic abuse montgomery alabama drug seizure florence alabama serial boaz alabama Shonda Walker, concealed carry brady v maryland south carolina trussville alabama social media car accident kidnapping Malone v State heritage christian university nathan woods felony assaults alfonso morris peyton pruitt birchfield v north dakota aziz sayyed levins v state sentencing law and policy blog summaries midazolam tarrant alabama texas William Pryor betton v state Wesley Adam Whitworth state of alabama pelham alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix West Alabama foley alabama OJ Simpson smith v state fourth amendment beylund v north dakota operation bullseye Etowah County Alabama, fultondale alabama stanley brent chapman Alonzo Ephraim Mike Hubbard terell corey mcmullin dekalb county alabama illegal gun carry negligent homicide Xavier Beasley mountain brook alabama bailey v us debit card skimming scams utah supreme court gadsden alabama battles v state baldwin county alabama assault Adamsville alabama aiding and abetting Walker County Alabama Justice Sotomayor mobile alabama street racing murder prostitution sting alabama criminal law roundup court of criminal appeal releases eleventh circuit ruling homicide greene county alabama cullman alabama ferguson missouri calhoun county alabama adnan syed, mcwilliams v dunn crime of passion kenneth eugene billups § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing christian guitierez department of justice, attempted murder limestone county alabama forced isolation heflin alabama making a murderer dora alabama Joshua Reese 28 U.S.C. § 2254 constitutional law, ake v oklahoma birmingham alabama tuscaloosa alabama madison alabama st clair county alabama Dylann Roof keith v state Ingmire v State narcotics investigation Neil Gorsuch Thomas Hardiman gun rights ring v arizona warrior alabama death penalty Glaze v State blountsville alabama avondale alabama dothan alabama

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.