CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeals Decisions - April 2018

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, April 27, 2018

 Pruitt v. State 16-0956

 

 

Pruitt pleaded guilty to two counts of committing a sex act with a student, violations of § 13A-6-81, and two counts of distributing obscene material to a minor, violations of § 13A-12-200.5. These offenses involved 3 students Pruitt formerly taught. Pruitt was a teacher in the Blount County School system. She taught at the Locust Fork High School during the 2012-13 and 2013-14 school years. She taught the three students during this time. Beginning in the 2014-15 school year, Pruitt was transferred to Appalachian High School. During October 2014, she sent Student #1 nude Snapchat pictures, had deviate sexual intercourse with Student #2, and had sexual intercourse with Student #3. For all intents and purposes, the acts were consensual. These facts were stipulated by both sides. Prior to pleading guilty, Pruitt, relying on Lawrence v. Texas, argued that the statutes and charges were unconstitutional as applied to her. AFFIRMED The Court of Criminal Appeals rejected the Lawrence-based argument on the grounds that Lawrence explicitly held that the decision didn’t apply to conduct involving minors. Further, the Court concluded that the State has a legitimate state interest in “prohibiting intimate contact between a teacher and a student.” The Court likewise rejected Pruitt’s “consent” defense since the statute expressly says “consent is not a defense.” Finally, the Court held that the fact that Pruitt did not teach at the same school as the students did not entitle her to relief. The Court also rejected an argument that her violation for unlawful distribution of obscene material to a minor didn’t violate her right to Equal Protection to be free from State intervention in a private relationship with a consulting person. The Court ruled against this argument based on the student being a minor (per § 13A-12-200.1) and previous holdings that the State doesn’t violate Equal Protection concerns by prohibiting sexual contact with minors.
 
Towles v. State CR-15-0699
Towles was convicted of capital murder pursuant to §13A-5-40(a)(15) for killing his girlfriend’s son by hitting him on the buttocks with a piece of lumber. This appealed stemmed from a re-trial after the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed his capital murder conviction and death sentence years back. In the interim, Towles’ girlfriend pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. The girlfriend didn’t testify at trial. Towles’ defense was that she caused the death and then blackmailed him to help her cover up the child’s death. However, the State impeached Towles by discussing how she had pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. REVERSED The Court concluded that the introduction of the girlfriend’s conviction into evidence was improper evidence of Towles’ guilt. The Court also concluded that the trial court’s instruction that “knowledge of the probability of death or great bodily harm is sufficient to constitute murder” impermissibly lessened the State’s burden and undermined the defense’s argument that the killing was, at most, unintentional. Mr. Towles will now go back for his third trial.

 

Betton v. State CR-15-1501
Betton was a juvenile capital defendant seeking re-sentencing under Miller v. Alabama. Here, the circuit court re-sentenced him to LWOP without considering the factors the Alabama Supreme Court announced in Ex parte Henderson. REMANDED The Court held that remand was necessary for the circuit court to enter specific findings under Ex parte Henderson.
 
Battles v. State CR-17-0044
In a prosecution for unlawful possession of a pistol by a forbidden person pursuant to § 13A-11-72(a), Battles waived counsel and represented himself at trial. However, throughout, Battles complained that he didn’t understand the charges against him and complained that he didn’t have the resources necessary to defend his case. REVERSED The Court concluded that while Battles knowingly waived his right to represent himself at trial, the circuit court failed to the factors a court must discuss with a defendant pursuant to Fitzpatrick v. Wainwright, 800 F. 2d 1057 (11th Cir. 1986) and Tomlin v. State, 601 So. 2d 124 (Ala. 1991). Additionally, the court failed to tell Battles he could withdraw the waiver at any time.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

US Supreme Court Update banville v state pelham alabama Glaze v State strickland v washington legende v state scotus § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing § 13A-3-23 lethal injection drugs brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix criminal mischief department of justice robberies Lucky D Arcade mike gilotti death penalty Shonda Walker, murder morgan county alabama avondale alabama William Pryor eugene lee jones v state Benn v State editorial narcotics investigation drug trafficking, levins v state apprendi v new jersey serial assault benjamin todd acton lamar county hanceville alabama marion county fort payne alabama state of alabama SCOTUS, foley alabama implied consent court of criminal appeal releases maryland court of special appeals Briarwood Presbyterian Church betton v state OJ Simpson Made in America alabama criminal law roundup utah v strieff christmas shooting Woods v State armed robbery campbell v state brady v maryland lethal injection sheffield v state court systems, mount olive alabama heritage christian university fraud Pleasant Grove Alabama attempted murder anniston alabama, ake v oklahoma talladega superspeedway ring v arizona edwards v arizona midazolam warrior alabama asia mcclain operation crackdown fraudulent checks clarence thomas florence alabama sixth amendment drug smuggling Alabaster alabama steve avery russell calhoun Alonzo Ephraim bailey v us domestic violence Hillary Clinton, nathan woods endangerment of a child Joshua Reese debtor prison homicide homicide rate capital offenses prostitution sting adger alabama unlawful manufacturing Donald Trump, Eutaw Alabama dothan alabama OJ Simpson Tommy Arthur abuse operation bullseye brookside alabama kidnapping Samuel Alito alabama supreme court underage drinking kenneth eugene billups Guy Terrell Junior Tracie Todd boaz alabama oneonta alabama bessemer alabama cherokee county alabama bernard v north dakota car accident death penalty, crime of passion home repair fraud texas executions constitutional violations sentencing law and policy blog summaries pinson alabama lauderdale county alabama calhoun county alabama parole concealed carry moving violations npr hall v florida fairfield alabama, christian guitierez 2016 election, birmingham alabama towles v state dekalb county alabama sarah koenig state of arizona making a murderer baltimore city circuit court 28 U.S.C. § 2254 gun rights theft West Alabama self defense alabama law enforcement agency nicholas hawkins Wesley Adam Whitworth cullman alabama adnan syed, mccalla alabama court of criminal appeals birchfield v north dakota constitutional law, illegal gambling Sardis Alabama dora alabama trussville alabama Justice Sotomayor aziz sayyed Kareem Dacar Gaymon social media Etowah County Alabama, stoves v state Thomas Hardiman gadsden alabama drug busts jerry bohannon drug seizure utah supreme court Jefferson County Alabama second amendment capital punishment smith v state morris alabama identity theft terell corey mcmullin public assistance fraud keith v state brian fredick lucas Adamsville alabama New York Times Easter Mike Hubbard peyton pruitt mcwilliams v dunn blount county alabama blountsville alabama ferguson missouri springville alabama beylund v north dakota illegal gun carry drug activity tuscaloosa alabama drug crimes LWOP john earle redfearn IV v state huntsville alabama alfonso morris Walker County Alabama Neil Gorsuch kimberly alabama habeas corpus relief hurst v florida Ingmire v State fultondale alabama animal cruelty abandonment minor offenses fake kidnapping, the mannequin challenge moore v texas hoax destructive devices debit card skimming scams church robberies tarrant alabama fourth amendment netflix capital murder felony assaults aiding and abetting bomb threat Gardendale Alabama brendan dassey negligent homicide Rule 32 decatur alabama shoplifting Kay Ivey limestone county alabama heflin alabama mulga alabama shooting death department of justice, hurst mandamus eleventh circuit ruling mountain brook alabama sexual assault montgomery alabama road rage burglary south carolina battles v state eric sterling ex parte briseno albertville alabama judicial override criminal justice reform, greene county alabama Marengo County Alabama huntsville forced isolation Xavier Beasley Stephen Breyer madison alabama Dylann Roof alabama Malone v State warrantless blood draws economic growth criminal justice rainbow city alabama breaking and entering abduction shooting gun control eighth amendment, pell city alabama Fentanyl theft of property stanley brent chapman hoover alabama st clair county alabama baldwin county alabama pruitt v state domestic abuse embezzlement CCA update arson shelby county street racing mobile alabama drug possession,

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.