CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Adnan Syed of "Serial" Granted New Trial

J.D. Lloyd - Thursday, March 29, 2018

(Image Credit: Getty Images)


In the ongoing case of Adnan Syed, made famous by NPR's "Serial" podcast, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals has ruled in Adnan's favor and has ordered that he be granted a new trial. In a long decision, the Court determined that Adnan's trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to investigate Asia McClain, a witness who purportedly could have provided Adnan with a crucial alibi for the window of time he was allegedly killing Hae Min Lee in a Best Buy parking lot.



The case was on appeal by both Adnan and the State of Maryland. In the Baltimore City Circuit Court, Adnan had been granted a new trial based upon counsel's failure to question the State's cell phone tower data expert about a warning on a fax cover sheet to the data that warned about the data's unreliability. The circuit court had rejected the claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate Asia. Both sides appealed their adverse rulings.


And both sides won. The Court of Special Appeals reached the opposite conclusions than that of the Baltimore City Circuit Court. The Court found the circuit court was wrong to grant Adnan relief on the fax cover sheet issue, but was also wrong to deny relief based on counsel's failure to investigate Asia's alibi. The Court explained:
McClain’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, would have made it impossible for Syed to have murdered Hae. Trial counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced Syed’s defense, because, but for trial counsel’s failure to investigate, there is a reasonable probability that McClain’s alibi testimony would have raised a reasonable doubt in the mind of at least one juror about Syed’s involvement Hae’s murder, and thus “the result of the proceedings would have been different."


When you're complaining that your trial counsel screwed up and denied you your Sixth Amendment right to effective representation, you have to show two things: (1) that some error occurred, and (2) that the error prejudiced you in a way that calls the results of the case into question. You have to show a "reasonable probability" that the results of trial would have been different. You don't have to prove innocence (it helps), but you've got to show more than just "this hurt my case." Here, it's easy to see how a jury could have believed an alibi about Adnan's whereabouts. There was no definitive evidence about where he was -- just circumstantial evidence that was dubious.


I don't practice in Maryland and am not well-versed in Maryland appellate procedure, but it looks like the State (or Adnan) might ask a higher court -- the Maryland Court of Appeals -- to review the decision. It doesn't look like either side has a right to appeal to this court and would have to ask for that court to review.


Like you, I'm anxiously awaiting a Sarah Koenig update...


Recent Posts


lauderdale county alabama state of arizona pruitt v state utah v strieff domestic abuse Sardis Alabama minor offenses executions embezzlement pell city alabama Mike Hubbard negligent homicide editorial hanceville alabama strickland v washington eric sterling Neil Gorsuch cherokee county alabama texas Malone v State npr drug trafficking, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 blount county alabama campbell v state parole brady v maryland florence alabama tarrant alabama sexual assault drug crimes levins v state brendan dassey alabama criminal law roundup domestic violence Rule 32 department of justice, huntsville Justice Sotomayor death penalty court systems, maryland court of special appeals baltimore city circuit court road rage st clair county alabama Dylann Roof Jefferson County Alabama montgomery alabama gun control alabama law enforcement agency murder utah supreme court theft ex parte briseno bomb threat operation crackdown homicide rate decatur alabama aziz sayyed aiding and abetting gun rights Tracie Todd smith v state illegal gambling fraud legende v state hurst mandamus sixth amendment identity theft mccalla alabama social media shelby county church robberies Alonzo Ephraim shoplifting LWOP trussville alabama West Alabama dekalb county alabama brian fredick lucas ring v arizona crime of passion Woods v State breaking and entering Joshua Reese drug seizure bernard v north dakota robberies Briarwood Presbyterian Church mountain brook alabama greene county alabama public assistance fraud Etowah County Alabama, Alabaster alabama mcwilliams v dunn homicide implied consent limestone county alabama capital murder russell calhoun fultondale alabama Shonda Walker, fort payne alabama drug possession, drug activity making a murderer Marengo County Alabama ferguson missouri felony assaults marion county state of alabama OJ Simpson home repair fraud springville alabama prostitution sting alfonso morris William Pryor towles v state Stephen Breyer court of criminal appeals operation bullseye illegal gun carry alabama mulga alabama narcotics investigation warrantless blood draws alabama supreme court § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing adger alabama car accident Guy Terrell Junior the mannequin challenge banville v state ake v oklahoma self defense foley alabama kimberly alabama Adamsville alabama albertville alabama baldwin county alabama underage drinking beylund v north dakota huntsville alabama SCOTUS, adnan syed, netflix judicial override stoves v state criminal justice reform, dothan alabama kenneth eugene billups abandonment 2016 election, Ingmire v State Gardendale Alabama forced isolation sarah koenig constitutional violations mike gilotti edwards v arizona Kareem Dacar Gaymon steve avery calhoun county alabama Thomas Hardiman moving violations bessemer alabama benjamin todd acton Eutaw Alabama Glaze v State christmas shooting blountsville alabama warrior alabama eugene lee jones v state sentencing law and policy blog summaries fake kidnapping, south carolina debtor prison Samuel Alito department of justice bailey v us terell corey mcmullin assault morgan county alabama morris alabama eleventh circuit ruling mount olive alabama birmingham alabama keith v state clarence thomas Benn v State armed robbery CCA update apprendi v new jersey habeas corpus relief theft of property brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix § 13A-3-23 criminal justice capital offenses drug smuggling Kay Ivey Xavier Beasley betton v state second amendment fraudulent checks serial endangerment of a child jerry bohannon nathan woods lamar county concealed carry Lucky D Arcade Pleasant Grove Alabama kidnapping birchfield v north dakota eighth amendment, Wesley Adam Whitworth heflin alabama avondale alabama pinson alabama madison alabama peyton pruitt asia mcclain sheffield v state criminal mischief burglary cullman alabama mobile alabama oneonta alabama Easter abuse fourth amendment Tommy Arthur christian guitierez New York Times rainbow city alabama hoover alabama pelham alabama midazolam Walker County Alabama tuscaloosa alabama talladega superspeedway anniston alabama, lethal injection drugs john earle redfearn IV v state Donald Trump, constitutional law, street racing court of criminal appeal releases stanley brent chapman hall v florida animal cruelty Hillary Clinton, dora alabama boaz alabama shooting drug busts shooting death hoax destructive devices battles v state OJ Simpson Made in America unlawful manufacturing capital punishment death penalty, fairfield alabama, economic growth heritage christian university attempted murder moore v texas gadsden alabama Fentanyl nicholas hawkins lethal injection debit card skimming scams US Supreme Court Update brookside alabama arson abduction hurst v florida scotus



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.