CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Adnan Syed of "Serial" Granted New Trial

J.D. Lloyd - Thursday, March 29, 2018


(Image Credit: Getty Images)

 

In the ongoing case of Adnan Syed, made famous by NPR's "Serial" podcast, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals has ruled in Adnan's favor and has ordered that he be granted a new trial. In a long decision, the Court determined that Adnan's trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to investigate Asia McClain, a witness who purportedly could have provided Adnan with a crucial alibi for the window of time he was allegedly killing Hae Min Lee in a Best Buy parking lot.

 

 

The case was on appeal by both Adnan and the State of Maryland. In the Baltimore City Circuit Court, Adnan had been granted a new trial based upon counsel's failure to question the State's cell phone tower data expert about a warning on a fax cover sheet to the data that warned about the data's unreliability. The circuit court had rejected the claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate Asia. Both sides appealed their adverse rulings.

 

And both sides won. The Court of Special Appeals reached the opposite conclusions than that of the Baltimore City Circuit Court. The Court found the circuit court was wrong to grant Adnan relief on the fax cover sheet issue, but was also wrong to deny relief based on counsel's failure to investigate Asia's alibi. The Court explained:
 
McClain’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, would have made it impossible for Syed to have murdered Hae. Trial counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced Syed’s defense, because, but for trial counsel’s failure to investigate, there is a reasonable probability that McClain’s alibi testimony would have raised a reasonable doubt in the mind of at least one juror about Syed’s involvement Hae’s murder, and thus “the result of the proceedings would have been different."

 

When you're complaining that your trial counsel screwed up and denied you your Sixth Amendment right to effective representation, you have to show two things: (1) that some error occurred, and (2) that the error prejudiced you in a way that calls the results of the case into question. You have to show a "reasonable probability" that the results of trial would have been different. You don't have to prove innocence (it helps), but you've got to show more than just "this hurt my case." Here, it's easy to see how a jury could have believed an alibi about Adnan's whereabouts. There was no definitive evidence about where he was -- just circumstantial evidence that was dubious.

 

I don't practice in Maryland and am not well-versed in Maryland appellate procedure, but it looks like the State (or Adnan) might ask a higher court -- the Maryland Court of Appeals -- to review the decision. It doesn't look like either side has a right to appeal to this court and would have to ask for that court to review.

 

Like you, I'm anxiously awaiting a Sarah Koenig update...

 


Recent Posts


Tags

netflix making a murderer theft steve avery forced isolation Adamsville alabama capital offenses ex parte briseno strickland v washington drug trafficking, adger alabama shoplifting tuscaloosa alabama Thomas Hardiman death penalty, heritage christian university mount olive alabama pinson alabama huntsville alabama road rage blountsville alabama pell city alabama Fentanyl adnan syed, Ingmire v State debit card skimming scams habeas corpus relief moving violations fort payne alabama narcotics investigation public assistance fraud morgan county alabama social media department of justice apprendi v new jersey assault avondale alabama anniston alabama, mulga alabama drug smuggling Benn v State fultondale alabama eugene lee jones v state theft of property drug crimes clarence thomas Samuel Alito mike gilotti edwards v arizona battles v state sixth amendment terell corey mcmullin drug seizure florence alabama russell calhoun department of justice, identity theft OJ Simpson Made in America marion county nicholas hawkins mcwilliams v dunn midazolam arson Joshua Reese LWOP gun rights ferguson missouri madison alabama capital murder fake kidnapping, Rule 32 dothan alabama banville v state Donald Trump, Jefferson County Alabama Eutaw Alabama Malone v State hoover alabama abduction pelham alabama brady v maryland fraud alfonso morris criminal mischief drug activity hoax destructive devices sheffield v state drug busts court systems, betton v state bessemer alabama burglary benjamin todd acton Tracie Todd Lucky D Arcade christmas shooting Hillary Clinton, cullman alabama shooting death heflin alabama capital punishment huntsville birmingham alabama abandonment prostitution sting alabama criminal law roundup sentencing law and policy blog summaries stoves v state endangerment of a child christian guitierez Mike Hubbard crime of passion minor offenses Glaze v State mobile alabama editorial smith v state eric sterling church robberies fraudulent checks aziz sayyed springville alabama negligent homicide § 13A-3-23 Xavier Beasley texas oneonta alabama SCOTUS, executions trussville alabama Stephen Breyer shelby county debtor prison state of arizona gadsden alabama concealed carry 28 U.S.C. § 2254 lauderdale county alabama ake v oklahoma blount county alabama Justice Sotomayor rainbow city alabama implied consent Alonzo Ephraim aiding and abetting talladega superspeedway eleventh circuit ruling stanley brent chapman campbell v state street racing baldwin county alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix south carolina economic growth Shonda Walker, home repair fraud Pleasant Grove Alabama embezzlement legende v state john earle redfearn IV v state car accident kenneth eugene billups mountain brook alabama brendan dassey constitutional law, Briarwood Presbyterian Church murder breaking and entering nathan woods utah v strieff lethal injection drugs underage drinking felony assaults Easter the mannequin challenge fourth amendment lethal injection drug possession, eighth amendment, Dylann Roof bernard v north dakota peyton pruitt criminal justice keith v state § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing Sardis Alabama illegal gambling birchfield v north dakota robberies state of alabama bailey v us ring v arizona Walker County Alabama dora alabama moore v texas beylund v north dakota armed robbery foley alabama hall v florida shooting dekalb county alabama albertville alabama hurst mandamus New York Times alabama domestic violence Marengo County Alabama sarah koenig Etowah County Alabama, Woods v State illegal gun carry Alabaster alabama calhoun county alabama 2016 election, domestic abuse morris alabama greene county alabama cherokee county alabama court of criminal appeal releases parole OJ Simpson Kareem Dacar Gaymon maryland court of special appeals tarrant alabama homicide rate lamar county scotus Gardendale Alabama court of criminal appeals CCA update abuse hanceville alabama operation bullseye alabama law enforcement agency death penalty attempted murder pruitt v state st clair county alabama criminal justice reform, gun control operation crackdown brookside alabama kimberly alabama asia mcclain jerry bohannon levins v state Neil Gorsuch mccalla alabama judicial override serial fairfield alabama, npr limestone county alabama bomb threat boaz alabama US Supreme Court Update animal cruelty alabama supreme court self defense kidnapping towles v state Wesley Adam Whitworth West Alabama homicide William Pryor sexual assault brian fredick lucas montgomery alabama hurst v florida second amendment warrior alabama Tommy Arthur utah supreme court baltimore city circuit court warrantless blood draws Guy Terrell Junior unlawful manufacturing decatur alabama constitutional violations Kay Ivey

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.