CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Adnan Syed of "Serial" Granted New Trial

J.D. Lloyd - Thursday, March 29, 2018

(Image Credit: Getty Images)


In the ongoing case of Adnan Syed, made famous by NPR's "Serial" podcast, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals has ruled in Adnan's favor and has ordered that he be granted a new trial. In a long decision, the Court determined that Adnan's trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to investigate Asia McClain, a witness who purportedly could have provided Adnan with a crucial alibi for the window of time he was allegedly killing Hae Min Lee in a Best Buy parking lot.



The case was on appeal by both Adnan and the State of Maryland. In the Baltimore City Circuit Court, Adnan had been granted a new trial based upon counsel's failure to question the State's cell phone tower data expert about a warning on a fax cover sheet to the data that warned about the data's unreliability. The circuit court had rejected the claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate Asia. Both sides appealed their adverse rulings.


And both sides won. The Court of Special Appeals reached the opposite conclusions than that of the Baltimore City Circuit Court. The Court found the circuit court was wrong to grant Adnan relief on the fax cover sheet issue, but was also wrong to deny relief based on counsel's failure to investigate Asia's alibi. The Court explained:
McClain’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, would have made it impossible for Syed to have murdered Hae. Trial counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced Syed’s defense, because, but for trial counsel’s failure to investigate, there is a reasonable probability that McClain’s alibi testimony would have raised a reasonable doubt in the mind of at least one juror about Syed’s involvement Hae’s murder, and thus “the result of the proceedings would have been different."


When you're complaining that your trial counsel screwed up and denied you your Sixth Amendment right to effective representation, you have to show two things: (1) that some error occurred, and (2) that the error prejudiced you in a way that calls the results of the case into question. You have to show a "reasonable probability" that the results of trial would have been different. You don't have to prove innocence (it helps), but you've got to show more than just "this hurt my case." Here, it's easy to see how a jury could have believed an alibi about Adnan's whereabouts. There was no definitive evidence about where he was -- just circumstantial evidence that was dubious.


I don't practice in Maryland and am not well-versed in Maryland appellate procedure, but it looks like the State (or Adnan) might ask a higher court -- the Maryland Court of Appeals -- to review the decision. It doesn't look like either side has a right to appeal to this court and would have to ask for that court to review.


Like you, I'm anxiously awaiting a Sarah Koenig update...


Recent Posts


social media Malone v State fourth amendment Sardis Alabama habeas corpus relief maryland court of special appeals negligent homicide huntsville cherokee county alabama benjamin todd acton underage drinking fort payne alabama clarence thomas drug busts marion county madison alabama state of alabama morgan county alabama nathan woods robberies homicide Neil Gorsuch OJ Simpson the mannequin challenge drug seizure drug smuggling car accident eric sterling CCA update § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing court of criminal appeals Justice Sotomayor state of arizona court of criminal appeal releases netflix Stephen Breyer rainbow city alabama Benn v State keith v state mccalla alabama Kay Ivey theft of property banville v state West Alabama hall v florida mike gilotti towles v state Kareem Dacar Gaymon abuse boaz alabama Fentanyl stanley brent chapman operation crackdown dekalb county alabama abandonment mountain brook alabama fultondale alabama edwards v arizona Alonzo Ephraim economic growth Adamsville alabama arson crime of passion oneonta alabama Rule 32 warrantless blood draws Jefferson County Alabama executions department of justice, huntsville alabama fraud midazolam heritage christian university adnan syed, alabama road rage SCOTUS, Guy Terrell Junior Ingmire v State Woods v State sexual assault stoves v state adger alabama alabama law enforcement agency New York Times judicial override alfonso morris Joshua Reese serial Eutaw Alabama Marengo County Alabama making a murderer sixth amendment domestic abuse embezzlement gun rights court systems, assault mobile alabama criminal justice street racing eleventh circuit ruling steve avery mcwilliams v dunn gadsden alabama drug crimes 28 U.S.C. § 2254 shooting death Walker County Alabama smith v state sheffield v state pell city alabama dothan alabama st clair county alabama blount county alabama Etowah County Alabama, pelham alabama tarrant alabama second amendment eugene lee jones v state terell corey mcmullin florence alabama sentencing law and policy blog summaries scotus breaking and entering limestone county alabama apprendi v new jersey ring v arizona campbell v state birchfield v north dakota christmas shooting tuscaloosa alabama lauderdale county alabama pinson alabama shelby county Pleasant Grove Alabama theft felony assaults department of justice concealed carry warrior alabama § 13A-3-23 Briarwood Presbyterian Church utah v strieff murder lethal injection drugs death penalty, Tommy Arthur russell calhoun lethal injection cullman alabama criminal justice reform, brendan dassey capital murder constitutional law, jerry bohannon brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix Easter alabama criminal law roundup moore v texas shooting hurst mandamus animal cruelty illegal gambling abduction south carolina bessemer alabama nicholas hawkins avondale alabama mount olive alabama kenneth eugene billups lamar county bomb threat death penalty hoax destructive devices ferguson missouri unlawful manufacturing hoover alabama drug possession, aiding and abetting shoplifting baldwin county alabama mulga alabama aziz sayyed moving violations debtor prison fake kidnapping, Donald Trump, Alabaster alabama christian guitierez pruitt v state attempted murder Hillary Clinton, domestic violence home repair fraud operation bullseye bailey v us alabama supreme court drug activity Samuel Alito eighth amendment, baltimore city circuit court forced isolation implied consent editorial drug trafficking, US Supreme Court Update 2016 election, endangerment of a child gun control kidnapping Dylann Roof self defense OJ Simpson Made in America narcotics investigation foley alabama blountsville alabama decatur alabama springville alabama Tracie Todd legende v state texas calhoun county alabama capital offenses birmingham alabama constitutional violations beylund v north dakota fairfield alabama, levins v state debit card skimming scams parole public assistance fraud heflin alabama betton v state hurst v florida montgomery alabama brookside alabama William Pryor criminal mischief Glaze v State morris alabama john earle redfearn IV v state prostitution sting LWOP kimberly alabama utah supreme court battles v state dora alabama fraudulent checks minor offenses homicide rate bernard v north dakota Gardendale Alabama capital punishment armed robbery ex parte briseno greene county alabama burglary Xavier Beasley sarah koenig Mike Hubbard anniston alabama, Thomas Hardiman church robberies hanceville alabama peyton pruitt identity theft asia mcclain Shonda Walker, npr brady v maryland ake v oklahoma Wesley Adam Whitworth talladega superspeedway illegal gun carry albertville alabama strickland v washington brian fredick lucas trussville alabama Lucky D Arcade



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.