CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Adnan Syed of "Serial" Granted New Trial

J.D. Lloyd - Thursday, March 29, 2018

(Image Credit: Getty Images)


In the ongoing case of Adnan Syed, made famous by NPR's "Serial" podcast, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals has ruled in Adnan's favor and has ordered that he be granted a new trial. In a long decision, the Court determined that Adnan's trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to investigate Asia McClain, a witness who purportedly could have provided Adnan with a crucial alibi for the window of time he was allegedly killing Hae Min Lee in a Best Buy parking lot.



The case was on appeal by both Adnan and the State of Maryland. In the Baltimore City Circuit Court, Adnan had been granted a new trial based upon counsel's failure to question the State's cell phone tower data expert about a warning on a fax cover sheet to the data that warned about the data's unreliability. The circuit court had rejected the claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate Asia. Both sides appealed their adverse rulings.


And both sides won. The Court of Special Appeals reached the opposite conclusions than that of the Baltimore City Circuit Court. The Court found the circuit court was wrong to grant Adnan relief on the fax cover sheet issue, but was also wrong to deny relief based on counsel's failure to investigate Asia's alibi. The Court explained:
McClain’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, would have made it impossible for Syed to have murdered Hae. Trial counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced Syed’s defense, because, but for trial counsel’s failure to investigate, there is a reasonable probability that McClain’s alibi testimony would have raised a reasonable doubt in the mind of at least one juror about Syed’s involvement Hae’s murder, and thus “the result of the proceedings would have been different."


When you're complaining that your trial counsel screwed up and denied you your Sixth Amendment right to effective representation, you have to show two things: (1) that some error occurred, and (2) that the error prejudiced you in a way that calls the results of the case into question. You have to show a "reasonable probability" that the results of trial would have been different. You don't have to prove innocence (it helps), but you've got to show more than just "this hurt my case." Here, it's easy to see how a jury could have believed an alibi about Adnan's whereabouts. There was no definitive evidence about where he was -- just circumstantial evidence that was dubious.


I don't practice in Maryland and am not well-versed in Maryland appellate procedure, but it looks like the State (or Adnan) might ask a higher court -- the Maryland Court of Appeals -- to review the decision. It doesn't look like either side has a right to appeal to this court and would have to ask for that court to review.


Like you, I'm anxiously awaiting a Sarah Koenig update...


Recent Posts


alabama Rule 32 aziz sayyed court of criminal appeal releases talladega superspeedway albertville alabama illegal gun carry moving violations utah supreme court West Alabama 2016 election, eighth amendment, fourth amendment sentencing law and policy blog summaries embezzlement department of justice social media bomb threat banville v state lethal injection § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing ake v oklahoma calhoun county alabama asia mcclain home repair fraud editorial drug activity jerry bohannon netflix edwards v arizona brendan dassey lamar county fraud mulga alabama death penalty foley alabama debtor prison limestone county alabama Jefferson County Alabama SCOTUS, hall v florida pruitt v state Wesley Adam Whitworth operation bullseye sarah koenig heritage christian university animal cruelty alabama law enforcement agency pell city alabama economic growth felony assaults domestic abuse drug seizure armed robbery blount county alabama CCA update Justice Sotomayor morris alabama judicial override capital punishment brookside alabama rainbow city alabama pinson alabama Lucky D Arcade unlawful manufacturing fort payne alabama state of arizona self defense the mannequin challenge Woods v State john earle redfearn IV v state robberies Neil Gorsuch ring v arizona morgan county alabama betton v state illegal gambling adnan syed, dothan alabama abuse montgomery alabama theft gun rights Hillary Clinton, smith v state ex parte briseno homicide Walker County Alabama towles v state eric sterling lethal injection drugs levins v state concealed carry implied consent Pleasant Grove Alabama kimberly alabama npr dekalb county alabama mike gilotti public assistance fraud shooting making a murderer operation crackdown tuscaloosa alabama fraudulent checks criminal justice alabama criminal law roundup parole Glaze v State abandonment beylund v north dakota huntsville alabama peyton pruitt endangerment of a child pelham alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon campbell v state mount olive alabama domestic violence south carolina fultondale alabama Xavier Beasley dora alabama avondale alabama birmingham alabama hanceville alabama texas decatur alabama LWOP negligent homicide narcotics investigation clarence thomas court systems, stanley brent chapman Joshua Reese steve avery theft of property trussville alabama brian fredick lucas hoover alabama OJ Simpson Made in America department of justice, crime of passion habeas corpus relief midazolam US Supreme Court Update criminal justice reform, Alonzo Ephraim gadsden alabama mccalla alabama street racing bailey v us Ingmire v State burglary hoax destructive devices Easter Thomas Hardiman Sardis Alabama constitutional violations Etowah County Alabama, attempted murder serial shooting death Malone v State New York Times hurst v florida second amendment drug crimes anniston alabama, William Pryor Kay Ivey minor offenses apprendi v new jersey sixth amendment huntsville bernard v north dakota shoplifting executions keith v state mountain brook alabama nathan woods maryland court of special appeals Samuel Alito tarrant alabama drug possession, russell calhoun Dylann Roof capital offenses greene county alabama gun control OJ Simpson underage drinking mcwilliams v dunn debit card skimming scams Mike Hubbard oneonta alabama moore v texas christmas shooting st clair county alabama lauderdale county alabama drug smuggling marion county aiding and abetting fairfield alabama, Shonda Walker, prostitution sting ferguson missouri 28 U.S.C. § 2254 strickland v washington Tracie Todd cullman alabama Benn v State fake kidnapping, Stephen Breyer assault breaking and entering Donald Trump, kidnapping § 13A-3-23 identity theft constitutional law, eugene lee jones v state murder Fentanyl alabama supreme court madison alabama bessemer alabama Tommy Arthur criminal mischief cherokee county alabama homicide rate Gardendale Alabama hurst mandamus arson abduction sexual assault heflin alabama boaz alabama drug trafficking, death penalty, Marengo County Alabama capital murder nicholas hawkins drug busts road rage legende v state adger alabama alfonso morris Eutaw Alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church sheffield v state florence alabama springville alabama birchfield v north dakota scotus Alabaster alabama church robberies mobile alabama warrior alabama warrantless blood draws utah v strieff baldwin county alabama baltimore city circuit court Adamsville alabama terell corey mcmullin brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix benjamin todd acton court of criminal appeals kenneth eugene billups state of alabama shelby county car accident blountsville alabama forced isolation stoves v state brady v maryland christian guitierez eleventh circuit ruling battles v state Guy Terrell Junior



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.