CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.


J.D. Lloyd - Friday, May 06, 2016

Eugene Lee Jones v. State (CR-14-1332)


Jones was convicted of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder, stemming from him killing a woman he suspected of setting him up in a robbery. Jones voluntarily talked to investigators on July 29, 2013, in connection to the death, but eventually stopped the questioning when he invoked his right to counsel. Jones was arrested on an outstanding warrant out of Bessemer. Jones was eventually transported back to Lauderdale County on another warrant stemming from a charge unrelated to the homicide. While still in custody, Jones was asked to submit to a polygraph examination. Jones waived his Miranda rights, submitted to the polygraph, and subsequently made another statement in which he admitted that he strangled the victim. Jones moved to suppress this statement under Edwards v. AZ, 451 US 477 (1981) on the grounds that investigators improperly re-initiated contact after he had invoked his right to counsel. The circuit court denied the motion. AFFIRMED. Relying on MD v. Shatzer, 559 US 98 (2010), the CCA affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress on the grounds that “coercive effect” of re-initiation of interrogation wasn’t present in this case like it was in Edwards. Essentially, the Court held that if enough time has passed since the initial invocation of the right to counsel -- more than 14 days -- there is no presumptively problematic re-initiation as there was in Edwards.


Levins v. State (CR-15-0612)


Bell v. State (CR-15-0618)

The appellants in these two cases were two expungement petitioners who were denied relief at the circuit court level and asked the CCA to reverse the denials of their petitions. APPEALS DISMISSED One may only challenge the denial of their expungement petition by petitioning the Alabama Supreme Court for certiorari review of the denial of the petition for expungement.

John Earle Redfearn, IV v. State (CR-14-0500)


This case involved the denial of a motion to suppress drugs evidence recovered from Redfearn’s body. In February 2012, law enforcement obtained a search warrant of Redfearn’s residence based upon 2 controlled buys that occurred at the residence with Redfearn. Law enforcement executed the SW after they observed Redfearn drive away from the house. He was stopped several miles away while the search of the house was going on and taken back to the house by the detaining officers. While executing the warrant, Redfearn’s girlfriend arrived at the house and eventually told the officers that Redfearn keeps drugs on his person. An officer strip-searched Redfearn at the residence and recovered a bottle containing oxycodone pills in his underwear. Redfearn moved to suppress under Bailey v. US, 133 S.Ct. 1031 (2013). AFFIRMED. The CCA explained that while Bailey held that a suspect may be lawfully detained while police are conducting a search warrant only when the person is in the "immediate vicinity" of the place to be searched, Redfearn was properly detained because the police had probable cause to arrest him based upon the controlled buys previously carried out with Redfearn and observed by law enforcement.


Nathaniel Woods (CR-10-0695)

Alfonso Morris (CR-11-1925)

John Russell Calhoun (CR-14-0779)

In these three cases, the CCA affirmed the denial of Rule 32 relief for death-row inmates without holding evidentiary hearings. There’s not much that’s noteworthy in these opinions outside of the observation that the petitions were summarily denied because each petitioner failed to plead sufficient facts that, if proven true, could entitle them to relief. The vast majority of the factual claims in the three petitions were bare-boned factual allegations. In Woods and Morris, petitioners raised claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present certain expert testimony at trial. The CCA affirmed the summary dismissal of these claims because the petitioner failed to identify an expert and what that expert’s testimony would have been at the pleading stage. It bears repeating that if you’re going to raise an IAC claim, in order to be entitled to a hearing, you have to give the circuit court sufficient factual allegations that the court can conclude that your claims could entitle you to relief if proven true. In the context of IAC based on the failure to call certain expert witnesses, you need to make a proffer as to who that expert would have been and what the testimony would have been at the pleading stage.


Brian Fredick Lucas (CR-14-0744)


Lucas was convicted of first-degree attempted sodomy by forcible compulsion and first-degree sexual abuse stemming from an incident in which he allegedly touched his step-daughter on the mouth with his penis while she was sleeping. The CCA reversed his first-degree sodomy conviction on the grounds that the State’s showing did not present evidence of forcible compulsion -- there was no threat by Lucas or evidence that his actions overcame her earnest resistance. The CCA did enter a judgment convicting Lucas of attempted sexual misconduct.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


Sardis Alabama south carolina campbell v state fake kidnapping, negligent homicide mobile alabama § 13A-3-23 narcotics investigation unlawful manufacturing SCOTUS, operation crackdown st clair county alabama the mannequin challenge capital punishment US Supreme Court Update animal cruelty moving violations Joshua Reese cherokee county alabama capital murder Lucky D Arcade eugene lee jones v state tarrant alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church bomb threat Kay Ivey smith v state hoax destructive devices illegal gambling scotus tuscaloosa alabama mccalla alabama battles v state christmas shooting benjamin todd acton drug trafficking, theft of property cullman alabama executions sarah koenig dora alabama brady v maryland keith v state terell corey mcmullin maryland court of special appeals death penalty, debit card skimming scams ex parte briseno mike gilotti sentencing law and policy blog summaries talladega superspeedway abduction birmingham alabama Samuel Alito trussville alabama state of alabama adnan syed, domestic abuse state of arizona lauderdale county alabama abuse oneonta alabama embezzlement utah v strieff lethal injection drugs stanley brent chapman huntsville alabama Stephen Breyer hall v florida Thomas Hardiman capital offenses Alabaster alabama court of criminal appeal releases aiding and abetting adger alabama Donald Trump, West Alabama OJ Simpson Made in America stoves v state limestone county alabama LWOP making a murderer baltimore city circuit court Easter drug smuggling mulga alabama anniston alabama, texas social media marion county department of justice, towles v state ring v arizona Adamsville alabama morgan county alabama economic growth alabama law enforcement agency pruitt v state calhoun county alabama debtor prison eleventh circuit ruling street racing constitutional law, editorial asia mcclain pell city alabama alabama criminal law roundup springville alabama William Pryor montgomery alabama church robberies Malone v State gun rights gadsden alabama shooting fourth amendment midazolam drug busts heritage christian university dothan alabama Fentanyl boaz alabama avondale alabama christian guitierez felony assaults greene county alabama burglary edwards v arizona madison alabama forced isolation eighth amendment, Ingmire v State hurst mandamus blountsville alabama kenneth eugene billups attempted murder drug crimes hurst v florida florence alabama strickland v washington lamar county warrior alabama court systems, banville v state drug possession, Rule 32 utah supreme court New York Times parole underage drinking operation bullseye alabama crime of passion Guy Terrell Junior armed robbery judicial override breaking and entering albertville alabama concealed carry hanceville alabama kidnapping birchfield v north dakota blount county alabama legende v state sheffield v state CCA update criminal mischief huntsville brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix lethal injection home repair fraud nathan woods Mike Hubbard steve avery Tommy Arthur apprendi v new jersey pelham alabama Glaze v State Jefferson County Alabama assault levins v state drug activity criminal justice reform, Justice Sotomayor domestic violence shooting death netflix nicholas hawkins homicide drug seizure § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing Walker County Alabama fairfield alabama, hoover alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama ferguson missouri peyton pruitt Marengo County Alabama Hillary Clinton, heflin alabama habeas corpus relief bessemer alabama beylund v north dakota sexual assault shelby county minor offenses department of justice mount olive alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 court of criminal appeals Kareem Dacar Gaymon self defense ake v oklahoma betton v state fraudulent checks dekalb county alabama fort payne alabama abandonment identity theft pinson alabama warrantless blood draws kimberly alabama foley alabama criminal justice illegal gun carry moore v texas shoplifting Xavier Beasley baldwin county alabama Alonzo Ephraim murder bailey v us death penalty implied consent eric sterling alabama supreme court alfonso morris mcwilliams v dunn fultondale alabama Benn v State decatur alabama OJ Simpson clarence thomas gun control theft npr Etowah County Alabama, bernard v north dakota Wesley Adam Whitworth Tracie Todd public assistance fraud road rage Dylann Roof arson fraud serial Woods v State Neil Gorsuch brookside alabama endangerment of a child Gardendale Alabama Eutaw Alabama second amendment prostitution sting brian fredick lucas morris alabama russell calhoun john earle redfearn IV v state car accident Shonda Walker, rainbow city alabama brendan dassey sixth amendment robberies mountain brook alabama aziz sayyed constitutional violations homicide rate jerry bohannon 2016 election,



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.