CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.


J.D. Lloyd - Friday, May 06, 2016

Eugene Lee Jones v. State (CR-14-1332)


Jones was convicted of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder, stemming from him killing a woman he suspected of setting him up in a robbery. Jones voluntarily talked to investigators on July 29, 2013, in connection to the death, but eventually stopped the questioning when he invoked his right to counsel. Jones was arrested on an outstanding warrant out of Bessemer. Jones was eventually transported back to Lauderdale County on another warrant stemming from a charge unrelated to the homicide. While still in custody, Jones was asked to submit to a polygraph examination. Jones waived his Miranda rights, submitted to the polygraph, and subsequently made another statement in which he admitted that he strangled the victim. Jones moved to suppress this statement under Edwards v. AZ, 451 US 477 (1981) on the grounds that investigators improperly re-initiated contact after he had invoked his right to counsel. The circuit court denied the motion. AFFIRMED. Relying on MD v. Shatzer, 559 US 98 (2010), the CCA affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress on the grounds that “coercive effect” of re-initiation of interrogation wasn’t present in this case like it was in Edwards. Essentially, the Court held that if enough time has passed since the initial invocation of the right to counsel -- more than 14 days -- there is no presumptively problematic re-initiation as there was in Edwards.


Levins v. State (CR-15-0612)


Bell v. State (CR-15-0618)

The appellants in these two cases were two expungement petitioners who were denied relief at the circuit court level and asked the CCA to reverse the denials of their petitions. APPEALS DISMISSED One may only challenge the denial of their expungement petition by petitioning the Alabama Supreme Court for certiorari review of the denial of the petition for expungement.

John Earle Redfearn, IV v. State (CR-14-0500)


This case involved the denial of a motion to suppress drugs evidence recovered from Redfearn’s body. In February 2012, law enforcement obtained a search warrant of Redfearn’s residence based upon 2 controlled buys that occurred at the residence with Redfearn. Law enforcement executed the SW after they observed Redfearn drive away from the house. He was stopped several miles away while the search of the house was going on and taken back to the house by the detaining officers. While executing the warrant, Redfearn’s girlfriend arrived at the house and eventually told the officers that Redfearn keeps drugs on his person. An officer strip-searched Redfearn at the residence and recovered a bottle containing oxycodone pills in his underwear. Redfearn moved to suppress under Bailey v. US, 133 S.Ct. 1031 (2013). AFFIRMED. The CCA explained that while Bailey held that a suspect may be lawfully detained while police are conducting a search warrant only when the person is in the "immediate vicinity" of the place to be searched, Redfearn was properly detained because the police had probable cause to arrest him based upon the controlled buys previously carried out with Redfearn and observed by law enforcement.


Nathaniel Woods (CR-10-0695)

Alfonso Morris (CR-11-1925)

John Russell Calhoun (CR-14-0779)

In these three cases, the CCA affirmed the denial of Rule 32 relief for death-row inmates without holding evidentiary hearings. There’s not much that’s noteworthy in these opinions outside of the observation that the petitions were summarily denied because each petitioner failed to plead sufficient facts that, if proven true, could entitle them to relief. The vast majority of the factual claims in the three petitions were bare-boned factual allegations. In Woods and Morris, petitioners raised claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present certain expert testimony at trial. The CCA affirmed the summary dismissal of these claims because the petitioner failed to identify an expert and what that expert’s testimony would have been at the pleading stage. It bears repeating that if you’re going to raise an IAC claim, in order to be entitled to a hearing, you have to give the circuit court sufficient factual allegations that the court can conclude that your claims could entitle you to relief if proven true. In the context of IAC based on the failure to call certain expert witnesses, you need to make a proffer as to who that expert would have been and what the testimony would have been at the pleading stage.


Brian Fredick Lucas (CR-14-0744)


Lucas was convicted of first-degree attempted sodomy by forcible compulsion and first-degree sexual abuse stemming from an incident in which he allegedly touched his step-daughter on the mouth with his penis while she was sleeping. The CCA reversed his first-degree sodomy conviction on the grounds that the State’s showing did not present evidence of forcible compulsion -- there was no threat by Lucas or evidence that his actions overcame her earnest resistance. The CCA did enter a judgment convicting Lucas of attempted sexual misconduct.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


bernard v north dakota theft of property springville alabama drug activity endangerment of a child Marengo County Alabama albertville alabama drug smuggling beylund v north dakota levins v state edwards v arizona scotus criminal mischief utah supreme court drug seizure state of alabama prostitution sting jerry bohannon montgomery alabama maryland court of special appeals pelham alabama armed robbery brookside alabama underage drinking mount olive alabama death penalty, marion county Malone v State hall v florida making a murderer Sardis Alabama sheffield v state illegal gun carry drug crimes ring v arizona Benn v State debtor prison Stephen Breyer hanceville alabama birmingham alabama 2016 election, sarah koenig huntsville alabama car accident brian fredick lucas south carolina court of criminal appeal releases nathan woods Easter oneonta alabama strickland v washington breaking and entering hurst v florida alabama supreme court fraud apprendi v new jersey drug possession, cherokee county alabama huntsville New York Times dora alabama benjamin todd acton assault Kareem Dacar Gaymon Shonda Walker, terell corey mcmullin madison alabama hoover alabama Glaze v State tarrant alabama mobile alabama judicial override texas battles v state constitutional law, christian guitierez mulga alabama Neil Gorsuch lauderdale county alabama death penalty campbell v state robberies Eutaw Alabama SCOTUS, habeas corpus relief hoax destructive devices Samuel Alito Hillary Clinton, bomb threat capital punishment church robberies sexual assault christmas shooting abuse fourth amendment Wesley Adam Whitworth st clair county alabama concealed carry eighth amendment, banville v state self defense Justice Sotomayor trussville alabama capital murder domestic abuse brady v maryland Tommy Arthur arson bessemer alabama fultondale alabama pinson alabama tuscaloosa alabama West Alabama moving violations editorial keith v state Adamsville alabama anniston alabama, court of criminal appeals Guy Terrell Junior kimberly alabama greene county alabama attempted murder talladega superspeedway adger alabama alabama criminal law roundup blount county alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama aiding and abetting criminal justice reform, § 13A-3-23 William Pryor US Supreme Court Update Tracie Todd asia mcclain executions alabama Walker County Alabama identity theft kenneth eugene billups Xavier Beasley Ingmire v State Etowah County Alabama, ex parte briseno abduction florence alabama forced isolation Joshua Reese second amendment department of justice, unlawful manufacturing 28 U.S.C. § 2254 sentencing law and policy blog summaries fairfield alabama, fake kidnapping, netflix negligent homicide Jefferson County Alabama Alonzo Ephraim adnan syed, operation bullseye heritage christian university aziz sayyed rainbow city alabama lamar county alfonso morris narcotics investigation alabama law enforcement agency kidnapping stanley brent chapman Alabaster alabama warrantless blood draws dekalb county alabama criminal justice john earle redfearn IV v state ferguson missouri moore v texas brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix embezzlement baltimore city circuit court felony assaults abandonment smith v state Lucky D Arcade lethal injection lethal injection drugs brendan dassey birchfield v north dakota pell city alabama drug trafficking, social media homicide rate heflin alabama Rule 32 gun rights stoves v state clarence thomas debit card skimming scams street racing blountsville alabama limestone county alabama peyton pruitt foley alabama dothan alabama eugene lee jones v state shelby county npr drug busts shooting hurst mandamus department of justice morris alabama OJ Simpson fraudulent checks court systems, economic growth shooting death ake v oklahoma cullman alabama Dylann Roof capital offenses illegal gambling steve avery Mike Hubbard LWOP Kay Ivey shoplifting Fentanyl eric sterling animal cruelty utah v strieff constitutional violations nicholas hawkins sixth amendment mike gilotti theft pruitt v state CCA update minor offenses operation crackdown Donald Trump, calhoun county alabama decatur alabama homicide state of arizona parole legende v state murder betton v state § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing fort payne alabama public assistance fraud towles v state eleventh circuit ruling avondale alabama crime of passion mcwilliams v dunn midazolam baldwin county alabama gadsden alabama warrior alabama OJ Simpson Made in America burglary Thomas Hardiman the mannequin challenge implied consent Briarwood Presbyterian Church russell calhoun boaz alabama morgan county alabama Woods v State road rage mountain brook alabama bailey v us gun control mccalla alabama Gardendale Alabama home repair fraud serial domestic violence



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.