CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Supreme Court Update - New Protections Against Executing The Mentally Disabled

J.D. Lloyd - Thursday, March 30, 2017


Moore v. Texas (U.S. Supreme Court, March 28/2017)


Moore was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death. In post-trial proceedings, a circuit court concluded that Mr. Moore was intellectually disabled and, thus, ineligible for execution under Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) and Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. ___ (2014). The circuit court based its decision on the most current medical guidelines. However, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (“CCA”) rejected that conclusion and re-instated Moore’s death sentence. The CCA concluded that the circuit court erred in not following factors laid out in Ex parte Briseno, 135 S. W. 3d 1( 2004), which relied upon medical authority from 1992. Moore appealed, claiming the CCA’s reasoning violated the Eighth Amendment.



In Atkins, the Supreme Court opened the door to allow states to develop their own tests for determining intellectual disability and ineligibility for the death penalty. However, as the states have developed different tests, the Court has indicated it will review these procedures to determine whether the states have created “an unacceptable risk that persons with intellectual disability will be executed.” Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. at ___. Here, the Court took aim at Texas’ Atkins test for determining intellectual disability which was centered around out-dated medical information and court-created “factors” that have been widely criticized.


In holding that Mr. Moore was ineligible for the death penalty under Atkins, the circuit court relied on medical diagnostic standards coming from the 11th edition of the American Association on Intellectual and Development Disabilities (“AAIDD”) clinical manual and the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (“DSM-5”) published by the American Psychiatric Association. The court followed the “generally accepted, uncontroversial intellectual-disability diagnostic definitions” in reaching their conclusion. Basically, the circuit court relied on the most up-to-date diagnostic material in assessing Moore.


The CCA rejected the circuit court’s conclusion and chastised it for not applying the Briseno test for determining intellectual disability. The Briseno test was based upon the 9th edition of the AAIDD and included a seven-factor test that was not grounded in any medical authority -- just a judicial creation. The CCA recognized that the standards in the AAIDD may have changed, but concluded that the Briseno test “remained adequately informed by the medical community’s diagnostic framework.”


The Supreme Court concluded that the CCA’s reliance on out-dated medical information and “factors” that have been widely criticized and rejected in the legal and medical community could not comport with the Eighth Amendment as well as Atkins and Hall. While the State’s have leeway in formulating their own approach to addressing Atkins claims, the cornerstone of any scheme must be “the medical community’s diagnostic framework.”



Read the decision here



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


sheffield v state steve avery felony assaults st clair county alabama brady v maryland abandonment texas dora alabama tarrant alabama judicial override mcwilliams v dunn clarence thomas shooting death criminal justice reform, editorial constitutional law, armed robbery anniston alabama, montgomery alabama negligent homicide capital punishment OJ Simpson Made in America sexual assault theft of property beylund v north dakota Marengo County Alabama blountsville alabama huntsville alabama drug smuggling warrior alabama West Alabama lethal injection russell calhoun Fentanyl jerry bohannon drug busts capital murder baldwin county alabama Gardendale Alabama Samuel Alito second amendment making a murderer criminal mischief Walker County Alabama criminal justice bomb threat constitutional violations church robberies Alabaster alabama eric sterling Jefferson County Alabama Joshua Reese Pleasant Grove Alabama minor offenses hoover alabama home repair fraud terell corey mcmullin 28 U.S.C. § 2254 mccalla alabama arson Rule 32 eugene lee jones v state crime of passion albertville alabama adnan syed, court of criminal appeals cullman alabama pruitt v state hoax destructive devices Thomas Hardiman death penalty, shelby county 2016 election, betton v state aziz sayyed parole trussville alabama lamar county car accident edwards v arizona Glaze v State Kay Ivey calhoun county alabama dothan alabama smith v state forced isolation pell city alabama marion county fraud shoplifting underage drinking burglary court of criminal appeal releases moore v texas heritage christian university pelham alabama William Pryor birchfield v north dakota abduction homicide rate US Supreme Court Update springville alabama drug crimes implied consent road rage court systems, gun rights sixth amendment Easter greene county alabama sentencing law and policy blog summaries aiding and abetting midazolam breaking and entering Guy Terrell Junior eleventh circuit ruling mountain brook alabama brendan dassey ring v arizona Donald Trump, habeas corpus relief illegal gun carry drug activity public assistance fraud peyton pruitt boaz alabama CCA update concealed carry operation crackdown § 13A-3-23 lethal injection drugs heflin alabama limestone county alabama keith v state Mike Hubbard Briarwood Presbyterian Church drug seizure Tommy Arthur baltimore city circuit court kimberly alabama levins v state madison alabama social media ex parte briseno state of alabama Etowah County Alabama, fairfield alabama, the mannequin challenge sarah koenig mulga alabama Alonzo Ephraim alabama law enforcement agency prostitution sting hanceville alabama avondale alabama fourth amendment death penalty abuse kidnapping serial economic growth brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix oneonta alabama brookside alabama nathan woods fort payne alabama homicide Dylann Roof christian guitierez alabama supreme court birmingham alabama bernard v north dakota Xavier Beasley moving violations foley alabama Stephen Breyer mount olive alabama unlawful manufacturing identity theft asia mcclain benjamin todd acton Lucky D Arcade murder Shonda Walker, Tracie Todd stoves v state assault robberies hurst v florida domestic violence ake v oklahoma bessemer alabama towles v state animal cruelty Adamsville alabama npr Eutaw Alabama SCOTUS, blount county alabama morris alabama illegal gambling utah v strieff banville v state Wesley Adam Whitworth christmas shooting hurst mandamus hall v florida utah supreme court Woods v State gun control capital offenses Justice Sotomayor kenneth eugene billups stanley brent chapman alfonso morris fraudulent checks eighth amendment, Neil Gorsuch brian fredick lucas debtor prison netflix nicholas hawkins New York Times drug trafficking, endangerment of a child alabama criminal law roundup Kareem Dacar Gaymon dekalb county alabama tuscaloosa alabama lauderdale county alabama battles v state john earle redfearn IV v state legende v state scotus self defense Malone v State cherokee county alabama narcotics investigation adger alabama shooting decatur alabama LWOP pinson alabama department of justice talladega superspeedway rainbow city alabama strickland v washington huntsville drug possession, campbell v state OJ Simpson south carolina street racing theft alabama domestic abuse § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing Hillary Clinton, Benn v State attempted murder ferguson missouri state of arizona maryland court of special appeals Sardis Alabama warrantless blood draws fake kidnapping, gadsden alabama fultondale alabama bailey v us operation bullseye Ingmire v State embezzlement morgan county alabama apprendi v new jersey mike gilotti debit card skimming scams executions mobile alabama florence alabama department of justice,



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.