CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Alabama's Lethal Injection Survives Another Challenge

J.D. Lloyd - Tuesday, February 21, 2017



Today, the United States Supreme Court denied an Alabama death-row inmate’s request to review the constitutionality of Alabama’s three-drug execution protocol. Tommy Arthur argued that Alabama’s lethal injection cocktail violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on “cruel and unusual punishment” because the method risks severe and unnecessary pain and suffering. The Court’s refusal to review the protocol almost certainly means that Tommy Arthur, who has been on death row for more than 30 years, will likely be executed soon. It also likely means that defendants who hope to challenge Alabama’s method of execution face a massive uphill battle in future fights.


Since lethal injection became the preferred method of execution in the 1980s, almost all states have used a three-drug cocktail to carry out the execution. The first drug administered would be a large amount of a sedative that’s supposed to knock the inmate unconscious and suppress all sensation. The second drug would be a paralytic, which would stop all muscular-skeletal movements, including the diaphragm. The final drug would cause the heart to stop.


Until recently, the first drug used in the three-drug protocol was either sodium thiopental. The manufacturer discontinued production of that drug, so states turned to pentobarbital. That drug also became unavailable in 2013. The states then turned to midazolam, the drug at the heart of recent Eighth Amendment litigation.


According to experts, midazolam doesn’t have the anesthetic effect of thiopental or pentobarbital. This is important because the second and third drugs administered in the the lethal injection process are extremely painful. Reports describe the pain from these drugs as a searing, burning pain spreading from the injection site throughout the body. Again, they literally stop your breathing and your heart. So, without a strong sedative, an inmate is likely facing an excruciating (and often prolonged) execution.


Executions using midazolam have been awful. Defendants executed with the drug in Oklahoma, Arizona, and Alabama died slowly and, apparently, very painfully when midazolam has been the first drug administered. (Justice Sotomayor’s dissent below details these executions.)


In challenging a method of execution as unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment, a defendant must show a readily available constitutional alternative. Here, Arthur argued that there was a constitutional alternative to lethal injection in Alabama: the firing squad. The lower federal courts rejected this claim because Alabama law doesn’t specifically provide for death-by-firing-squad. Because Arthur couldn’t prove a constitutional alternative, the court wouldn’t review his claim that the cocktail using midazolam was unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment.


Justice Sotomayor wrote a scathing dissent from the the Court’s refusal to consider this case. The dissent pointed out that Alabama recently amended its laws to allow for the execution of a defendant by “any constitutional method of execution.” See 15-18-82.1(c). Justice Sotomayor argued that Arthur met his burden of showing a constitutional alternative, even if that alternative wasn’t on the books in Alabama.


The dissent here was largely a critique on the lethal-injection protocol itself and the Court’s refusal to consider how screwed up our Eighth Amendment jurisprudence has become when a defendant can show that a method of execution causes unnecessary (and unconstitutional) pain and suffering, but can still be executed with that method because a State doesn’t have another method of execution on the books.


Read Sotomayor’s dissent here.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


gadsden alabama death penalty stanley brent chapman springville alabama Glaze v State eleventh circuit ruling towles v state street racing criminal justice reform, asia mcclain warrior alabama mount olive alabama theft brady v maryland huntsville alabama smith v state serial attempted murder birchfield v north dakota underage drinking brendan dassey illegal gambling pelham alabama decatur alabama fourth amendment arson Thomas Hardiman Adamsville alabama murder baldwin county alabama netflix south carolina the mannequin challenge narcotics investigation hall v florida adger alabama alabama supreme court apprendi v new jersey drug smuggling alabama law enforcement agency church robberies William Pryor homicide rate oneonta alabama steve avery LWOP theft of property marion county stoves v state constitutional law, hurst mandamus battles v state kenneth eugene billups bailey v us russell calhoun Kay Ivey Donald Trump, Briarwood Presbyterian Church US Supreme Court Update Mike Hubbard eugene lee jones v state § 13A-3-23 ferguson missouri albertville alabama identity theft peyton pruitt Walker County Alabama bessemer alabama brian fredick lucas huntsville Joshua Reese Marengo County Alabama tuscaloosa alabama fraudulent checks fake kidnapping, felony assaults cherokee county alabama christian guitierez forced isolation assault ake v oklahoma terell corey mcmullin prostitution sting department of justice, drug seizure unlawful manufacturing lethal injection criminal mischief morgan county alabama Jefferson County Alabama CCA update betton v state clarence thomas hurst v florida drug crimes sexual assault Tracie Todd baltimore city circuit court drug busts benjamin todd acton crime of passion alabama criminal law roundup second amendment talladega superspeedway legende v state trussville alabama utah supreme court minor offenses Alabaster alabama death penalty, montgomery alabama campbell v state endangerment of a child gun control alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix debit card skimming scams mccalla alabama gun rights Pleasant Grove Alabama greene county alabama florence alabama Gardendale Alabama mobile alabama christmas shooting New York Times state of alabama aiding and abetting Etowah County Alabama, 2016 election, levins v state domestic violence economic growth sentencing law and policy blog summaries Alonzo Ephraim home repair fraud Ingmire v State making a murderer lamar county court systems, Dylann Roof midazolam executions shooting death breaking and entering adnan syed, public assistance fraud keith v state kidnapping calhoun county alabama fairfield alabama, beylund v north dakota banville v state drug activity aziz sayyed Shonda Walker, § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing fort payne alabama robberies Samuel Alito utah v strieff bomb threat negligent homicide mulga alabama SCOTUS, Eutaw Alabama mcwilliams v dunn Wesley Adam Whitworth dothan alabama nathan woods shoplifting animal cruelty Kareem Dacar Gaymon fultondale alabama brookside alabama operation bullseye mike gilotti court of criminal appeal releases hoover alabama Guy Terrell Junior pell city alabama ex parte briseno cullman alabama abandonment foley alabama Benn v State court of criminal appeals hanceville alabama embezzlement madison alabama nicholas hawkins abuse sheffield v state Xavier Beasley avondale alabama domestic abuse parole OJ Simpson Made in America Justice Sotomayor Stephen Breyer Easter Tommy Arthur npr capital murder boaz alabama alfonso morris scotus bernard v north dakota criminal justice Lucky D Arcade OJ Simpson edwards v arizona operation crackdown West Alabama illegal gun carry Hillary Clinton, capital punishment judicial override hoax destructive devices eighth amendment, dora alabama drug trafficking, debtor prison abduction ring v arizona shooting self defense heflin alabama state of arizona mountain brook alabama rainbow city alabama kimberly alabama sixth amendment st clair county alabama Fentanyl tarrant alabama john earle redfearn IV v state moving violations habeas corpus relief shelby county homicide social media drug possession, limestone county alabama constitutional violations anniston alabama, car accident armed robbery blount county alabama implied consent capital offenses jerry bohannon heritage christian university Neil Gorsuch Woods v State dekalb county alabama burglary strickland v washington department of justice warrantless blood draws lauderdale county alabama blountsville alabama editorial eric sterling sarah koenig texas pruitt v state birmingham alabama Rule 32 maryland court of special appeals fraud Malone v State 28 U.S.C. § 2254 road rage Sardis Alabama moore v texas morris alabama pinson alabama concealed carry lethal injection drugs



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.