CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Alabama's Lethal Injection Survives Another Challenge

J.D. Lloyd - Tuesday, February 21, 2017



Today, the United States Supreme Court denied an Alabama death-row inmate’s request to review the constitutionality of Alabama’s three-drug execution protocol. Tommy Arthur argued that Alabama’s lethal injection cocktail violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on “cruel and unusual punishment” because the method risks severe and unnecessary pain and suffering. The Court’s refusal to review the protocol almost certainly means that Tommy Arthur, who has been on death row for more than 30 years, will likely be executed soon. It also likely means that defendants who hope to challenge Alabama’s method of execution face a massive uphill battle in future fights.


Since lethal injection became the preferred method of execution in the 1980s, almost all states have used a three-drug cocktail to carry out the execution. The first drug administered would be a large amount of a sedative that’s supposed to knock the inmate unconscious and suppress all sensation. The second drug would be a paralytic, which would stop all muscular-skeletal movements, including the diaphragm. The final drug would cause the heart to stop.


Until recently, the first drug used in the three-drug protocol was either sodium thiopental. The manufacturer discontinued production of that drug, so states turned to pentobarbital. That drug also became unavailable in 2013. The states then turned to midazolam, the drug at the heart of recent Eighth Amendment litigation.


According to experts, midazolam doesn’t have the anesthetic effect of thiopental or pentobarbital. This is important because the second and third drugs administered in the the lethal injection process are extremely painful. Reports describe the pain from these drugs as a searing, burning pain spreading from the injection site throughout the body. Again, they literally stop your breathing and your heart. So, without a strong sedative, an inmate is likely facing an excruciating (and often prolonged) execution.


Executions using midazolam have been awful. Defendants executed with the drug in Oklahoma, Arizona, and Alabama died slowly and, apparently, very painfully when midazolam has been the first drug administered. (Justice Sotomayor’s dissent below details these executions.)


In challenging a method of execution as unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment, a defendant must show a readily available constitutional alternative. Here, Arthur argued that there was a constitutional alternative to lethal injection in Alabama: the firing squad. The lower federal courts rejected this claim because Alabama law doesn’t specifically provide for death-by-firing-squad. Because Arthur couldn’t prove a constitutional alternative, the court wouldn’t review his claim that the cocktail using midazolam was unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment.


Justice Sotomayor wrote a scathing dissent from the the Court’s refusal to consider this case. The dissent pointed out that Alabama recently amended its laws to allow for the execution of a defendant by “any constitutional method of execution.” See 15-18-82.1(c). Justice Sotomayor argued that Arthur met his burden of showing a constitutional alternative, even if that alternative wasn’t on the books in Alabama.


The dissent here was largely a critique on the lethal-injection protocol itself and the Court’s refusal to consider how screwed up our Eighth Amendment jurisprudence has become when a defendant can show that a method of execution causes unnecessary (and unconstitutional) pain and suffering, but can still be executed with that method because a State doesn’t have another method of execution on the books.


Read Sotomayor’s dissent here.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


28 U.S.C. § 2254 hurst v florida steve avery second amendment calhoun county alabama npr § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing drug possession, unlawful manufacturing alabama narcotics investigation pelham alabama banville v state criminal justice baltimore city circuit court street racing fultondale alabama endangerment of a child US Supreme Court Update cullman alabama john earle redfearn IV v state smith v state abduction heritage christian university moore v texas kimberly alabama brookside alabama capital punishment nathan woods Eutaw Alabama Easter battles v state bomb threat nicholas hawkins hanceville alabama fairfield alabama, Malone v State Fentanyl Shonda Walker, cherokee county alabama Jefferson County Alabama hoover alabama West Alabama church robberies the mannequin challenge OJ Simpson Made in America alabama supreme court parole netflix theft implied consent ring v arizona foley alabama abandonment mccalla alabama felony assaults trussville alabama Adamsville alabama scotus Etowah County Alabama, avondale alabama madison alabama lauderdale county alabama Rule 32 making a murderer edwards v arizona kenneth eugene billups negligent homicide sentencing law and policy blog summaries morris alabama ex parte briseno tarrant alabama blount county alabama Woods v State alabama criminal law roundup mount olive alabama brady v maryland peyton pruitt dekalb county alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church birchfield v north dakota mountain brook alabama LWOP south carolina judicial override ake v oklahoma criminal mischief lamar county embezzlement rainbow city alabama debtor prison debit card skimming scams Lucky D Arcade Guy Terrell Junior st clair county alabama strickland v washington drug busts capital murder § 13A-3-23 sexual assault hall v florida gadsden alabama aiding and abetting utah supreme court forced isolation warrior alabama legende v state adnan syed, mulga alabama serial robberies capital offenses social media Glaze v State drug trafficking, huntsville alabama Donald Trump, mcwilliams v dunn home repair fraud baldwin county alabama christmas shooting William Pryor mike gilotti stoves v state death penalty, gun rights Samuel Alito court of criminal appeals court systems, shooting underage drinking kidnapping tuscaloosa alabama alfonso morris keith v state hurst mandamus concealed carry burglary limestone county alabama eighth amendment, sixth amendment Dylann Roof Sardis Alabama russell calhoun domestic abuse maryland court of special appeals springville alabama homicide rate Joshua Reese marion county pruitt v state criminal justice reform, operation bullseye habeas corpus relief morgan county alabama Xavier Beasley shoplifting pinson alabama minor offenses talladega superspeedway beylund v north dakota Alonzo Ephraim sarah koenig arson brian fredick lucas gun control Marengo County Alabama brendan dassey Justice Sotomayor huntsville asia mcclain moving violations CCA update eric sterling stanley brent chapman bailey v us Thomas Hardiman dothan alabama jerry bohannon pell city alabama Kay Ivey Pleasant Grove Alabama montgomery alabama domestic violence apprendi v new jersey towles v state illegal gun carry terell corey mcmullin Tracie Todd christian guitierez Neil Gorsuch SCOTUS, ferguson missouri florence alabama prostitution sting blountsville alabama fourth amendment drug seizure state of alabama drug activity armed robbery fraudulent checks economic growth Walker County Alabama death penalty sheffield v state warrantless blood draws benjamin todd acton mobile alabama crime of passion betton v state state of arizona theft of property levins v state 2016 election, self defense lethal injection drugs drug crimes drug smuggling brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix public assistance fraud boaz alabama operation crackdown fake kidnapping, eugene lee jones v state assault attempted murder executions alabama law enforcement agency dora alabama Stephen Breyer decatur alabama Alabaster alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon department of justice, constitutional law, murder bernard v north dakota anniston alabama, homicide birmingham alabama texas department of justice eleventh circuit ruling court of criminal appeal releases shooting death editorial bessemer alabama animal cruelty lethal injection Mike Hubbard fraud greene county alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth adger alabama midazolam car accident heflin alabama Gardendale Alabama road rage abuse Ingmire v State oneonta alabama clarence thomas albertville alabama OJ Simpson aziz sayyed Hillary Clinton, Benn v State breaking and entering shelby county New York Times fort payne alabama campbell v state constitutional violations Tommy Arthur identity theft illegal gambling hoax destructive devices utah v strieff



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.