CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Alabama's Lethal Injection Survives Another Challenge

J.D. Lloyd - Tuesday, February 21, 2017



Today, the United States Supreme Court denied an Alabama death-row inmate’s request to review the constitutionality of Alabama’s three-drug execution protocol. Tommy Arthur argued that Alabama’s lethal injection cocktail violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on “cruel and unusual punishment” because the method risks severe and unnecessary pain and suffering. The Court’s refusal to review the protocol almost certainly means that Tommy Arthur, who has been on death row for more than 30 years, will likely be executed soon. It also likely means that defendants who hope to challenge Alabama’s method of execution face a massive uphill battle in future fights.


Since lethal injection became the preferred method of execution in the 1980s, almost all states have used a three-drug cocktail to carry out the execution. The first drug administered would be a large amount of a sedative that’s supposed to knock the inmate unconscious and suppress all sensation. The second drug would be a paralytic, which would stop all muscular-skeletal movements, including the diaphragm. The final drug would cause the heart to stop.


Until recently, the first drug used in the three-drug protocol was either sodium thiopental. The manufacturer discontinued production of that drug, so states turned to pentobarbital. That drug also became unavailable in 2013. The states then turned to midazolam, the drug at the heart of recent Eighth Amendment litigation.


According to experts, midazolam doesn’t have the anesthetic effect of thiopental or pentobarbital. This is important because the second and third drugs administered in the the lethal injection process are extremely painful. Reports describe the pain from these drugs as a searing, burning pain spreading from the injection site throughout the body. Again, they literally stop your breathing and your heart. So, without a strong sedative, an inmate is likely facing an excruciating (and often prolonged) execution.


Executions using midazolam have been awful. Defendants executed with the drug in Oklahoma, Arizona, and Alabama died slowly and, apparently, very painfully when midazolam has been the first drug administered. (Justice Sotomayor’s dissent below details these executions.)


In challenging a method of execution as unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment, a defendant must show a readily available constitutional alternative. Here, Arthur argued that there was a constitutional alternative to lethal injection in Alabama: the firing squad. The lower federal courts rejected this claim because Alabama law doesn’t specifically provide for death-by-firing-squad. Because Arthur couldn’t prove a constitutional alternative, the court wouldn’t review his claim that the cocktail using midazolam was unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment.


Justice Sotomayor wrote a scathing dissent from the the Court’s refusal to consider this case. The dissent pointed out that Alabama recently amended its laws to allow for the execution of a defendant by “any constitutional method of execution.” See 15-18-82.1(c). Justice Sotomayor argued that Arthur met his burden of showing a constitutional alternative, even if that alternative wasn’t on the books in Alabama.


The dissent here was largely a critique on the lethal-injection protocol itself and the Court’s refusal to consider how screwed up our Eighth Amendment jurisprudence has become when a defendant can show that a method of execution causes unnecessary (and unconstitutional) pain and suffering, but can still be executed with that method because a State doesn’t have another method of execution on the books.


Read Sotomayor’s dissent here.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


utah supreme court morgan county alabama apprendi v new jersey brookside alabama florence alabama terell corey mcmullin shooting dekalb county alabama adger alabama fairfield alabama, birchfield v north dakota Shonda Walker, brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix Samuel Alito mobile alabama south carolina blount county alabama William Pryor drug seizure eleventh circuit ruling Benn v State ferguson missouri blountsville alabama gun rights brian fredick lucas church robberies legende v state illegal gun carry judicial override Alonzo Ephraim adnan syed, Etowah County Alabama, bessemer alabama self defense montgomery alabama assault capital punishment netflix Lucky D Arcade benjamin todd acton pell city alabama marion county edwards v arizona keith v state Fentanyl hall v florida brady v maryland sixth amendment West Alabama § 13A-3-23 npr drug trafficking, domestic violence pruitt v state Tracie Todd home repair fraud 28 U.S.C. § 2254 alabama supreme court narcotics investigation sheffield v state cherokee county alabama constitutional law, drug possession, Kay Ivey Jefferson County Alabama utah v strieff state of arizona aiding and abetting peyton pruitt street racing arson animal cruelty drug activity court of criminal appeal releases department of justice, Glaze v State negligent homicide shoplifting Adamsville alabama Justice Sotomayor st clair county alabama Rule 32 hoover alabama birmingham alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing attempted murder heflin alabama drug smuggling ring v arizona springville alabama bailey v us parole hanceville alabama CCA update theft habeas corpus relief abandonment Marengo County Alabama operation crackdown capital offenses alabama criminal law roundup scotus aziz sayyed eric sterling tarrant alabama Mike Hubbard decatur alabama Sardis Alabama eighth amendment, implied consent fake kidnapping, hurst mandamus debtor prison identity theft death penalty, beylund v north dakota maryland court of special appeals Tommy Arthur Neil Gorsuch Joshua Reese Malone v State US Supreme Court Update felony assaults pinson alabama avondale alabama criminal justice morris alabama embezzlement fourth amendment Stephen Breyer russell calhoun social media anniston alabama, sexual assault sentencing law and policy blog summaries hoax destructive devices death penalty mccalla alabama kimberly alabama abduction bernard v north dakota moore v texas Hillary Clinton, limestone county alabama calhoun county alabama constitutional violations lethal injection stanley brent chapman pelham alabama campbell v state mulga alabama alfonso morris Eutaw Alabama court systems, crime of passion levins v state second amendment Walker County Alabama bomb threat economic growth shelby county Alabaster alabama moving violations foley alabama nathan woods mount olive alabama shooting death minor offenses oneonta alabama public assistance fraud stoves v state Dylann Roof underage drinking hurst v florida albertville alabama serial brendan dassey kidnapping christian guitierez Wesley Adam Whitworth Pleasant Grove Alabama mcwilliams v dunn drug crimes state of alabama john earle redfearn IV v state heritage christian university Gardendale Alabama Easter warrior alabama New York Times strickland v washington burglary eugene lee jones v state executions cullman alabama mountain brook alabama sarah koenig huntsville gadsden alabama texas theft of property christmas shooting smith v state steve avery asia mcclain gun control OJ Simpson fort payne alabama OJ Simpson Made in America towles v state nicholas hawkins 2016 election, Kareem Dacar Gaymon Briarwood Presbyterian Church dora alabama unlawful manufacturing concealed carry betton v state SCOTUS, alabama law enforcement agency lethal injection drugs prostitution sting boaz alabama breaking and entering department of justice battles v state court of criminal appeals capital murder abuse banville v state the mannequin challenge huntsville alabama operation bullseye forced isolation tuscaloosa alabama alabama rainbow city alabama criminal justice reform, ake v oklahoma midazolam Donald Trump, lauderdale county alabama homicide rate criminal mischief LWOP Guy Terrell Junior making a murderer warrantless blood draws kenneth eugene billups Woods v State drug busts clarence thomas editorial endangerment of a child road rage trussville alabama car accident ex parte briseno domestic abuse baltimore city circuit court fraud madison alabama jerry bohannon robberies greene county alabama homicide Xavier Beasley mike gilotti illegal gambling baldwin county alabama dothan alabama lamar county fultondale alabama Thomas Hardiman talladega superspeedway debit card skimming scams murder Ingmire v State armed robbery fraudulent checks



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.