CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Alabama's Lethal Injection Survives Another Challenge

J.D. Lloyd - Tuesday, February 21, 2017



Today, the United States Supreme Court denied an Alabama death-row inmate’s request to review the constitutionality of Alabama’s three-drug execution protocol. Tommy Arthur argued that Alabama’s lethal injection cocktail violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on “cruel and unusual punishment” because the method risks severe and unnecessary pain and suffering. The Court’s refusal to review the protocol almost certainly means that Tommy Arthur, who has been on death row for more than 30 years, will likely be executed soon. It also likely means that defendants who hope to challenge Alabama’s method of execution face a massive uphill battle in future fights.


Since lethal injection became the preferred method of execution in the 1980s, almost all states have used a three-drug cocktail to carry out the execution. The first drug administered would be a large amount of a sedative that’s supposed to knock the inmate unconscious and suppress all sensation. The second drug would be a paralytic, which would stop all muscular-skeletal movements, including the diaphragm. The final drug would cause the heart to stop.


Until recently, the first drug used in the three-drug protocol was either sodium thiopental. The manufacturer discontinued production of that drug, so states turned to pentobarbital. That drug also became unavailable in 2013. The states then turned to midazolam, the drug at the heart of recent Eighth Amendment litigation.


According to experts, midazolam doesn’t have the anesthetic effect of thiopental or pentobarbital. This is important because the second and third drugs administered in the the lethal injection process are extremely painful. Reports describe the pain from these drugs as a searing, burning pain spreading from the injection site throughout the body. Again, they literally stop your breathing and your heart. So, without a strong sedative, an inmate is likely facing an excruciating (and often prolonged) execution.


Executions using midazolam have been awful. Defendants executed with the drug in Oklahoma, Arizona, and Alabama died slowly and, apparently, very painfully when midazolam has been the first drug administered. (Justice Sotomayor’s dissent below details these executions.)


In challenging a method of execution as unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment, a defendant must show a readily available constitutional alternative. Here, Arthur argued that there was a constitutional alternative to lethal injection in Alabama: the firing squad. The lower federal courts rejected this claim because Alabama law doesn’t specifically provide for death-by-firing-squad. Because Arthur couldn’t prove a constitutional alternative, the court wouldn’t review his claim that the cocktail using midazolam was unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment.


Justice Sotomayor wrote a scathing dissent from the the Court’s refusal to consider this case. The dissent pointed out that Alabama recently amended its laws to allow for the execution of a defendant by “any constitutional method of execution.” See 15-18-82.1(c). Justice Sotomayor argued that Arthur met his burden of showing a constitutional alternative, even if that alternative wasn’t on the books in Alabama.


The dissent here was largely a critique on the lethal-injection protocol itself and the Court’s refusal to consider how screwed up our Eighth Amendment jurisprudence has become when a defendant can show that a method of execution causes unnecessary (and unconstitutional) pain and suffering, but can still be executed with that method because a State doesn’t have another method of execution on the books.


Read Sotomayor’s dissent here.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


LWOP cullman alabama ex parte briseno fairfield alabama, narcotics investigation mike gilotti drug seizure steve avery homicide abuse home repair fraud state of arizona peyton pruitt sexual assault domestic violence levins v state eleventh circuit ruling economic growth limestone county alabama theft of property mobile alabama boaz alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama Glaze v State the mannequin challenge st clair county alabama legende v state Stephen Breyer criminal justice reform, sixth amendment campbell v state aiding and abetting Fentanyl clarence thomas Briarwood Presbyterian Church Malone v State armed robbery Shonda Walker, Tommy Arthur stoves v state embezzlement npr fraud criminal justice bessemer alabama texas montgomery alabama talladega superspeedway brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix Adamsville alabama Neil Gorsuch road rage court of criminal appeals morgan county alabama New York Times fake kidnapping, Woods v State dothan alabama fourth amendment shoplifting Justice Sotomayor south carolina Tracie Todd brendan dassey Easter underage drinking baltimore city circuit court adger alabama Eutaw Alabama lethal injection drugs death penalty rainbow city alabama operation bullseye jerry bohannon alabama law enforcement agency court of criminal appeal releases crime of passion illegal gambling car accident john earle redfearn IV v state madison alabama concealed carry identity theft Marengo County Alabama heritage christian university baldwin county alabama stanley brent chapman lamar county avondale alabama alfonso morris dora alabama criminal mischief sheffield v state debit card skimming scams tuscaloosa alabama hanceville alabama drug activity William Pryor betton v state constitutional law, mcwilliams v dunn sarah koenig albertville alabama second amendment Xavier Beasley florence alabama theft breaking and entering Lucky D Arcade executions smith v state pruitt v state Donald Trump, constitutional violations tarrant alabama brookside alabama Mike Hubbard 28 U.S.C. § 2254 parole social media warrior alabama terell corey mcmullin hurst mandamus brian fredick lucas hoover alabama birchfield v north dakota state of alabama Sardis Alabama nicholas hawkins dekalb county alabama fraudulent checks greene county alabama cherokee county alabama oneonta alabama abandonment eugene lee jones v state animal cruelty trussville alabama aziz sayyed adnan syed, shelby county sentencing law and policy blog summaries pell city alabama public assistance fraud homicide rate capital offenses apprendi v new jersey banville v state attempted murder midazolam self defense court systems, towles v state prostitution sting asia mcclain anniston alabama, Kay Ivey abduction illegal gun carry shooting operation crackdown US Supreme Court Update 2016 election, keith v state nathan woods OJ Simpson shooting death endangerment of a child scotus lethal injection SCOTUS, marion county editorial gun control moving violations brady v maryland arson Walker County Alabama blountsville alabama alabama supreme court moore v texas robberies bailey v us minor offenses lauderdale county alabama hoax destructive devices unlawful manufacturing Joshua Reese netflix hurst v florida russell calhoun mount olive alabama kidnapping fort payne alabama Benn v State eighth amendment, maryland court of special appeals Ingmire v State alabama criminal law roundup eric sterling West Alabama Jefferson County Alabama burglary capital murder Guy Terrell Junior forced isolation department of justice blount county alabama Gardendale Alabama foley alabama gadsden alabama bernard v north dakota Kareem Dacar Gaymon pinson alabama Thomas Hardiman felony assaults drug trafficking, utah supreme court springville alabama habeas corpus relief edwards v arizona drug possession, bomb threat implied consent warrantless blood draws street racing death penalty, § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing mulga alabama murder pelham alabama Samuel Alito benjamin todd acton domestic abuse huntsville drug busts strickland v washington OJ Simpson Made in America drug crimes ring v arizona Alabaster alabama christian guitierez Rule 32 CCA update ferguson missouri ake v oklahoma beylund v north dakota birmingham alabama fultondale alabama Hillary Clinton, heflin alabama § 13A-3-23 serial battles v state morris alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth making a murderer decatur alabama kenneth eugene billups huntsville alabama Etowah County Alabama, gun rights capital punishment Dylann Roof mountain brook alabama judicial override kimberly alabama debtor prison assault hall v florida christmas shooting utah v strieff alabama Alonzo Ephraim drug smuggling department of justice, negligent homicide calhoun county alabama mccalla alabama church robberies



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.