CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Alabama's Lethal Injection Survives Another Challenge

J.D. Lloyd - Tuesday, February 21, 2017

 

 

Today, the United States Supreme Court denied an Alabama death-row inmate’s request to review the constitutionality of Alabama’s three-drug execution protocol. Tommy Arthur argued that Alabama’s lethal injection cocktail violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on “cruel and unusual punishment” because the method risks severe and unnecessary pain and suffering. The Court’s refusal to review the protocol almost certainly means that Tommy Arthur, who has been on death row for more than 30 years, will likely be executed soon. It also likely means that defendants who hope to challenge Alabama’s method of execution face a massive uphill battle in future fights.

 

Since lethal injection became the preferred method of execution in the 1980s, almost all states have used a three-drug cocktail to carry out the execution. The first drug administered would be a large amount of a sedative that’s supposed to knock the inmate unconscious and suppress all sensation. The second drug would be a paralytic, which would stop all muscular-skeletal movements, including the diaphragm. The final drug would cause the heart to stop.

 

Until recently, the first drug used in the three-drug protocol was either sodium thiopental. The manufacturer discontinued production of that drug, so states turned to pentobarbital. That drug also became unavailable in 2013. The states then turned to midazolam, the drug at the heart of recent Eighth Amendment litigation.

 

According to experts, midazolam doesn’t have the anesthetic effect of thiopental or pentobarbital. This is important because the second and third drugs administered in the the lethal injection process are extremely painful. Reports describe the pain from these drugs as a searing, burning pain spreading from the injection site throughout the body. Again, they literally stop your breathing and your heart. So, without a strong sedative, an inmate is likely facing an excruciating (and often prolonged) execution.

 

Executions using midazolam have been awful. Defendants executed with the drug in Oklahoma, Arizona, and Alabama died slowly and, apparently, very painfully when midazolam has been the first drug administered. (Justice Sotomayor’s dissent below details these executions.)

 

In challenging a method of execution as unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment, a defendant must show a readily available constitutional alternative. Here, Arthur argued that there was a constitutional alternative to lethal injection in Alabama: the firing squad. The lower federal courts rejected this claim because Alabama law doesn’t specifically provide for death-by-firing-squad. Because Arthur couldn’t prove a constitutional alternative, the court wouldn’t review his claim that the cocktail using midazolam was unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment.

 

Justice Sotomayor wrote a scathing dissent from the the Court’s refusal to consider this case. The dissent pointed out that Alabama recently amended its laws to allow for the execution of a defendant by “any constitutional method of execution.” See 15-18-82.1(c). Justice Sotomayor argued that Arthur met his burden of showing a constitutional alternative, even if that alternative wasn’t on the books in Alabama.

 

The dissent here was largely a critique on the lethal-injection protocol itself and the Court’s refusal to consider how screwed up our Eighth Amendment jurisprudence has become when a defendant can show that a method of execution causes unnecessary (and unconstitutional) pain and suffering, but can still be executed with that method because a State doesn’t have another method of execution on the books.

 

Read Sotomayor’s dissent here.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

ferguson missouri hanceville alabama limestone county alabama pelham alabama eleventh circuit ruling Kareem Dacar Gaymon nicholas hawkins animal cruelty armed robbery drug trafficking, public assistance fraud negligent homicide sixth amendment john earle redfearn IV v state kenneth eugene billups capital offenses brookside alabama hurst mandamus utah v strieff Malone v State foley alabama sentencing law and policy blog summaries cullman alabama attempted murder road rage state of arizona Mike Hubbard maryland court of special appeals social media Glaze v State blountsville alabama Rule 32 forced isolation keith v state adger alabama Ingmire v State dekalb county alabama Samuel Alito OJ Simpson midazolam utah supreme court ring v arizona warrantless blood draws boaz alabama peyton pruitt homicide rate Briarwood Presbyterian Church jerry bohannon capital punishment William Pryor oneonta alabama Fentanyl domestic abuse kimberly alabama death penalty, campbell v state baltimore city circuit court smith v state scotus huntsville Woods v State hurst v florida christian guitierez moving violations Kay Ivey dothan alabama pruitt v state mountain brook alabama alfonso morris alabama criminal law roundup operation crackdown Wesley Adam Whitworth editorial morris alabama homicide Etowah County Alabama, madison alabama Thomas Hardiman parole brian fredick lucas Xavier Beasley street racing Tommy Arthur mount olive alabama Walker County Alabama eighth amendment, court systems, constitutional law, death penalty habeas corpus relief burglary criminal mischief tuscaloosa alabama the mannequin challenge trussville alabama home repair fraud steve avery Marengo County Alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Guy Terrell Junior capital murder self defense benjamin todd acton drug possession, illegal gun carry asia mcclain US Supreme Court Update gun rights implied consent towles v state terell corey mcmullin south carolina decatur alabama montgomery alabama fort payne alabama huntsville alabama albertville alabama lamar county underage drinking Benn v State beylund v north dakota car accident betton v state shooting theft warrior alabama 2016 election, drug activity economic growth Donald Trump, aziz sayyed murder morgan county alabama heflin alabama rainbow city alabama marion county moore v texas fraud SCOTUS, battles v state pinson alabama debtor prison serial narcotics investigation fourth amendment alabama supreme court crime of passion baldwin county alabama operation bullseye Gardendale Alabama hoax destructive devices blount county alabama felony assaults New York Times hoover alabama LWOP sarah koenig embezzlement apprendi v new jersey prostitution sting concealed carry bernard v north dakota Joshua Reese court of criminal appeals gun control department of justice, drug seizure russell calhoun abuse church robberies executions § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing minor offenses Lucky D Arcade lauderdale county alabama kidnapping Hillary Clinton, ake v oklahoma Stephen Breyer fake kidnapping, Alabaster alabama nathan woods brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix st clair county alabama West Alabama Sardis Alabama alabama law enforcement agency npr clarence thomas avondale alabama adnan syed, Eutaw Alabama alabama Dylann Roof greene county alabama christmas shooting endangerment of a child Easter dora alabama heritage christian university mulga alabama bessemer alabama Alonzo Ephraim criminal justice reform, eric sterling shoplifting springville alabama tarrant alabama robberies mcwilliams v dunn shooting death drug crimes talladega superspeedway Justice Sotomayor gadsden alabama texas brady v maryland constitutional violations mobile alabama § 13A-3-23 Neil Gorsuch mccalla alabama Tracie Todd lethal injection drugs arson brendan dassey sexual assault drug busts bailey v us Jefferson County Alabama breaking and entering netflix shelby county banville v state ex parte briseno abduction legende v state domestic violence debit card skimming scams criminal justice court of criminal appeal releases theft of property edwards v arizona strickland v washington anniston alabama, stanley brent chapman eugene lee jones v state illegal gambling hall v florida calhoun county alabama CCA update fultondale alabama unlawful manufacturing aiding and abetting cherokee county alabama sheffield v state drug smuggling identity theft OJ Simpson Made in America pell city alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama abandonment Adamsville alabama stoves v state levins v state department of justice birchfield v north dakota second amendment bomb threat Shonda Walker, birmingham alabama florence alabama fraudulent checks fairfield alabama, lethal injection state of alabama judicial override making a murderer assault mike gilotti

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.