CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

High Court Reverses Another Alabama Death Sentence

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, June 19, 2017

McWilliams v. Dunn, Comm’r ALDOC


Question Presented: Did Alabama courts wrongfully conclude McWilliams was not denied meaningful assistance from a mental-health expert under Ake v. Oklahoma?




McWilliams was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death for a 1994 robbery/rape/murder that took place in a convenience store in Tuscaloosa. McWilliams’ mental health was explored in depth during the course of his trial. He was examined by a “Lunacy Commission” composed of three doctors at Taylor Hardin Secure Medical Facility. After he was convicted and after the jury recommended he be sentenced to death by a vote of 10-2, McWilliams asked for neurological and neuropsychological exams. The court order a Dr. John Goff, a neuropsychologist with the State, to examine McWilliams. However, Dr. Goff’s findings were not based on a complete review of his mental health records. His report was given to McWilliams only 48 hours before the judicial sentencing phase. On the eve of the judicial sentencing hearing, Taylor Hardin and Holman Prison sent defense counsel updated records which had been subpoenaed months before. Trial counsel continuously asked the trial court for an independent expert and a continuance, but these requests were rejected.


Eventually, McWilliams case arrived in federal court when he filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief. Among other issues, McWilliams argued that the State deprived him of Due Process under Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 (1985). McWilliams argued this denial was a violation of “clearly established federal law” and thus entitled him to habeas corpus relief. The district court denied the request.


Ake v. Oklahoma

In Ake, the Court ruled that the Constitution requires the State to provide an indigent defendant with “assistance necessary to prepare an effective defense based on his mental condition” if the defendant’s sanity is in question. The ruling was framed around the concept of the “meaningful access to justice.” The expert should “assist in evaluation, preparation, and presentation of the defense.”


Eleventh Circuit Ruling

The Eleventh Circuit denied relief. Initially, the Court concluded that McWilliams failed to meet his burden of showing that “clearly established federal law” entitled him to an independent expert. The Eleventh Circuit noted a split in the circuits regarding whether Ake requires the appointment of an independent expert and that the Supreme Court had never resolved that split. Because the split existed, there was, in the Court’s opinion, no clearly established federal law that could entitled McWilliams relief on this claim. Additionally, the court concluded that the State courts’ determination that Ake had been satisfied was likewise not an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law.


Judge Wilson’s dissent

Judge Wilson believed that Ake was not satisfied here. First, the State failed to provide meaningful psychological assistance. McWilliams did not receive any expert assistance until after the sentencing hearing held before the jury. Second, the assistance McWilliams received from Dr. Goff was based on an incomplete review of the mental health records available for consideration. In Judge Wilson’s opinion, this paltry showing did not satisfy Ake and warrants habeas corpus relief.


Supreme Court Ruling

The Court ruled that in the particular circumstances of this case, McWilliams’ rights under Ake were not protected. The Court declined to answer the more specific question of whether Ake requires appointment of a mental health expert who is independent of the prosecution because Alabama failed to satisfy “Ake’s most basic requirements.”


The Court rejected Alabama’s argument that it complied with Ake by allowing Dr. Goff to examine McWilliams. Ake requires more: “[1] examination and assist in [2] evaluation, [3] preparation, and [4] presentation of the defense.” The Court concluded that even if it were to assume the State satisfied the “examination” requirement, it completely failed to satisfy the last three prongs.


While the 11th Circuit had ruled that whatever error McWilliams suffered was “harmless,” the Supreme Court noted that ruling was limited to just the question of whether the requested continuance would have made a difference in McWilliams sentencing. The Court pointed out that on remand the 11th Circuit should consider how the State’s failure to guarantee the remaining three prongs of Ake would have made a difference in McWilliams’ case.


Dissent (Alito, Roberts, Thomas, Gorsuch)

The dissent would have had the Court address the narrow question of whether it is clearly established federal law that Ake requires the appointment of an independent mental health expert. The dissent complains that Alabama didn’t have a chance to address the question the Court actually addressed. However, this simply isn’t true. Alabama briefed the merits of the underlying Ake claim at the merits stage.


The 11th Circuit on Remand

The Eleventh Circuit is likely to kick the case back down to the district court to address the full Ake question. It’s hard to see McWilliams’ death sentence standing when the Supreme Court has all but said 3 aspects of Ake weren’t satisfied here.


If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


mccalla alabama crime of passion abduction hurst v florida domestic violence Shonda Walker, stoves v state netflix greene county alabama springville alabama fourth amendment bessemer alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing gadsden alabama keith v state Mike Hubbard Malone v State adger alabama Alabaster alabama talladega superspeedway Eutaw Alabama Neil Gorsuch Easter sixth amendment apprendi v new jersey homicide bernard v north dakota West Alabama ex parte briseno fultondale alabama criminal justice alfonso morris decatur alabama eric sterling mobile alabama armed robbery russell calhoun fort payne alabama blountsville alabama hanceville alabama hoax destructive devices Xavier Beasley albertville alabama christian guitierez steve avery Rule 32 capital murder mount olive alabama Jefferson County Alabama cherokee county alabama bailey v us ferguson missouri Thomas Hardiman department of justice, levins v state felony assaults drug seizure mountain brook alabama limestone county alabama brady v maryland huntsville Gardendale Alabama sarah koenig pell city alabama home repair fraud drug possession, dekalb county alabama asia mcclain baltimore city circuit court moving violations Lucky D Arcade terell corey mcmullin parole Walker County Alabama maryland court of special appeals executions minor offenses utah supreme court abuse birmingham alabama baldwin county alabama capital punishment Hillary Clinton, pruitt v state banville v state hall v florida criminal mischief implied consent drug activity Tommy Arthur court systems, alabama blount county alabama endangerment of a child nicholas hawkins south carolina Alonzo Ephraim Marengo County Alabama CCA update heflin alabama lamar county stanley brent chapman robberies assault state of alabama OJ Simpson Made in America dora alabama scotus serial making a murderer morris alabama constitutional violations theft of property pelham alabama Samuel Alito illegal gambling betton v state eighth amendment, Adamsville alabama street racing Glaze v State operation crackdown pinson alabama lethal injection warrior alabama unlawful manufacturing montgomery alabama operation bullseye christmas shooting aiding and abetting shoplifting drug trafficking, fraudulent checks st clair county alabama illegal gun carry attempted murder eleventh circuit ruling alabama law enforcement agency hoover alabama judicial override eugene lee jones v state identity theft campbell v state drug busts calhoun county alabama benjamin todd acton oneonta alabama mcwilliams v dunn ake v oklahoma peyton pruitt lauderdale county alabama embezzlement rainbow city alabama burglary homicide rate battles v state cullman alabama shooting foley alabama anniston alabama, arson bomb threat state of arizona SCOTUS, warrantless blood draws Kareem Dacar Gaymon nathan woods car accident kenneth eugene billups 2016 election, fake kidnapping, economic growth boaz alabama adnan syed, William Pryor heritage christian university self defense forced isolation fraud morgan county alabama § 13A-3-23 OJ Simpson constitutional law, church robberies Briarwood Presbyterian Church sentencing law and policy blog summaries Kay Ivey breaking and entering Joshua Reese the mannequin challenge brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix sheffield v state Ingmire v State Benn v State Sardis Alabama moore v texas concealed carry narcotics investigation birchfield v north dakota mulga alabama underage drinking aziz sayyed sexual assault fairfield alabama, gun rights habeas corpus relief court of criminal appeal releases trussville alabama Fentanyl department of justice kidnapping LWOP debtor prison debit card skimming scams social media second amendment alabama supreme court avondale alabama Stephen Breyer legende v state alabama criminal law roundup kimberly alabama Woods v State beylund v north dakota utah v strieff edwards v arizona huntsville alabama prostitution sting death penalty npr gun control towles v state shelby county florence alabama public assistance fraud Guy Terrell Junior brian fredick lucas Dylann Roof marion county theft court of criminal appeals brookside alabama madison alabama texas domestic abuse Justice Sotomayor Pleasant Grove Alabama mike gilotti abandonment lethal injection drugs tuscaloosa alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth tarrant alabama john earle redfearn IV v state strickland v washington US Supreme Court Update brendan dassey Donald Trump, animal cruelty dothan alabama Etowah County Alabama, road rage drug smuggling Tracie Todd editorial midazolam death penalty, New York Times capital offenses ring v arizona shooting death drug crimes criminal justice reform, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 hurst mandamus clarence thomas negligent homicide jerry bohannon murder smith v state



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.