CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Adnan Syed of "Serial" Granted New Trial

J.D. Lloyd - Thursday, March 29, 2018

(Image Credit: Getty Images)


In the ongoing case of Adnan Syed, made famous by NPR's "Serial" podcast, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals has ruled in Adnan's favor and has ordered that he be granted a new trial. In a long decision, the Court determined that Adnan's trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to investigate Asia McClain, a witness who purportedly could have provided Adnan with a crucial alibi for the window of time he was allegedly killing Hae Min Lee in a Best Buy parking lot.



The case was on appeal by both Adnan and the State of Maryland. In the Baltimore City Circuit Court, Adnan had been granted a new trial based upon counsel's failure to question the State's cell phone tower data expert about a warning on a fax cover sheet to the data that warned about the data's unreliability. The circuit court had rejected the claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate Asia. Both sides appealed their adverse rulings.


And both sides won. The Court of Special Appeals reached the opposite conclusions than that of the Baltimore City Circuit Court. The Court found the circuit court was wrong to grant Adnan relief on the fax cover sheet issue, but was also wrong to deny relief based on counsel's failure to investigate Asia's alibi. The Court explained:
McClain’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, would have made it impossible for Syed to have murdered Hae. Trial counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced Syed’s defense, because, but for trial counsel’s failure to investigate, there is a reasonable probability that McClain’s alibi testimony would have raised a reasonable doubt in the mind of at least one juror about Syed’s involvement Hae’s murder, and thus “the result of the proceedings would have been different."


When you're complaining that your trial counsel screwed up and denied you your Sixth Amendment right to effective representation, you have to show two things: (1) that some error occurred, and (2) that the error prejudiced you in a way that calls the results of the case into question. You have to show a "reasonable probability" that the results of trial would have been different. You don't have to prove innocence (it helps), but you've got to show more than just "this hurt my case." Here, it's easy to see how a jury could have believed an alibi about Adnan's whereabouts. There was no definitive evidence about where he was -- just circumstantial evidence that was dubious.


I don't practice in Maryland and am not well-versed in Maryland appellate procedure, but it looks like the State (or Adnan) might ask a higher court -- the Maryland Court of Appeals -- to review the decision. It doesn't look like either side has a right to appeal to this court and would have to ask for that court to review.


Like you, I'm anxiously awaiting a Sarah Koenig update...


Recent Posts


sixth amendment executions dekalb county alabama car accident alabama criminal law roundup OJ Simpson Made in America embezzlement § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing russell calhoun debit card skimming scams apprendi v new jersey court of criminal appeal releases netflix smith v state making a murderer Tracie Todd avondale alabama illegal gun carry beylund v north dakota drug smuggling mount olive alabama CCA update sexual assault springville alabama animal cruelty levins v state felony assaults mountain brook alabama street racing keith v state Alonzo Ephraim mccalla alabama bailey v us bernard v north dakota hurst v florida aziz sayyed arson asia mcclain ex parte briseno stoves v state morgan county alabama brady v maryland death penalty montgomery alabama limestone county alabama south carolina birmingham alabama armed robbery birchfield v north dakota William Pryor battles v state § 13A-3-23 underage drinking maryland court of special appeals department of justice prostitution sting greene county alabama npr pell city alabama SCOTUS, heritage christian university Sardis Alabama Stephen Breyer mcwilliams v dunn eugene lee jones v state florence alabama fort payne alabama West Alabama clarence thomas boaz alabama madison alabama robberies court systems, nathan woods Justice Sotomayor capital punishment eleventh circuit ruling Benn v State Joshua Reese Thomas Hardiman murder towles v state endangerment of a child brookside alabama drug crimes theft warrantless blood draws Guy Terrell Junior drug possession, Eutaw Alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church fraud peyton pruitt Easter lamar county fultondale alabama decatur alabama Adamsville alabama Woods v State blountsville alabama kidnapping OJ Simpson Jefferson County Alabama warrior alabama benjamin todd acton john earle redfearn IV v state hoover alabama baltimore city circuit court mike gilotti unlawful manufacturing betton v state criminal justice reform, crime of passion sentencing law and policy blog summaries fourth amendment capital murder 28 U.S.C. § 2254 strickland v washington Fentanyl implied consent shooting eighth amendment, albertville alabama alabama supreme court Rule 32 Kareem Dacar Gaymon criminal mischief death penalty, sheffield v state public assistance fraud Mike Hubbard huntsville steve avery domestic abuse talladega superspeedway eric sterling bessemer alabama church robberies breaking and entering brendan dassey lauderdale county alabama US Supreme Court Update Ingmire v State oneonta alabama gadsden alabama utah v strieff the mannequin challenge theft of property ring v arizona department of justice, operation crackdown illegal gambling Neil Gorsuch dothan alabama huntsville alabama kenneth eugene billups drug trafficking, identity theft Samuel Alito road rage hall v florida operation bullseye brian fredick lucas Etowah County Alabama, shooting death Shonda Walker, marion county bomb threat cullman alabama Dylann Roof home repair fraud state of arizona tarrant alabama campbell v state kimberly alabama gun rights assault Alabaster alabama serial midazolam second amendment shelby county utah supreme court pruitt v state moore v texas Wesley Adam Whitworth lethal injection drugs calhoun county alabama Tommy Arthur Glaze v State burglary drug seizure lethal injection alfonso morris baldwin county alabama moving violations foley alabama hanceville alabama shoplifting constitutional violations adger alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix Walker County Alabama hoax destructive devices social media dora alabama Malone v State 2016 election, homicide rate concealed carry hurst mandamus forced isolation nicholas hawkins Donald Trump, parole LWOP Xavier Beasley attempted murder Hillary Clinton, New York Times editorial criminal justice state of alabama pinson alabama fake kidnapping, abandonment Pleasant Grove Alabama ake v oklahoma negligent homicide fairfield alabama, cherokee county alabama domestic violence capital offenses christian guitierez blount county alabama self defense heflin alabama habeas corpus relief Marengo County Alabama homicide ferguson missouri drug activity minor offenses fraudulent checks drug busts Kay Ivey Gardendale Alabama st clair county alabama pelham alabama debtor prison edwards v arizona jerry bohannon tuscaloosa alabama scotus economic growth abuse rainbow city alabama texas alabama law enforcement agency court of criminal appeals legende v state mobile alabama adnan syed, Lucky D Arcade aiding and abetting gun control christmas shooting morris alabama terell corey mcmullin anniston alabama, mulga alabama abduction stanley brent chapman banville v state sarah koenig judicial override trussville alabama constitutional law, narcotics investigation alabama



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.