CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Adnan Syed of "Serial" Granted New Trial

J.D. Lloyd - Thursday, March 29, 2018

(Image Credit: Getty Images)


In the ongoing case of Adnan Syed, made famous by NPR's "Serial" podcast, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals has ruled in Adnan's favor and has ordered that he be granted a new trial. In a long decision, the Court determined that Adnan's trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to investigate Asia McClain, a witness who purportedly could have provided Adnan with a crucial alibi for the window of time he was allegedly killing Hae Min Lee in a Best Buy parking lot.



The case was on appeal by both Adnan and the State of Maryland. In the Baltimore City Circuit Court, Adnan had been granted a new trial based upon counsel's failure to question the State's cell phone tower data expert about a warning on a fax cover sheet to the data that warned about the data's unreliability. The circuit court had rejected the claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate Asia. Both sides appealed their adverse rulings.


And both sides won. The Court of Special Appeals reached the opposite conclusions than that of the Baltimore City Circuit Court. The Court found the circuit court was wrong to grant Adnan relief on the fax cover sheet issue, but was also wrong to deny relief based on counsel's failure to investigate Asia's alibi. The Court explained:
McClain’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, would have made it impossible for Syed to have murdered Hae. Trial counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced Syed’s defense, because, but for trial counsel’s failure to investigate, there is a reasonable probability that McClain’s alibi testimony would have raised a reasonable doubt in the mind of at least one juror about Syed’s involvement Hae’s murder, and thus “the result of the proceedings would have been different."


When you're complaining that your trial counsel screwed up and denied you your Sixth Amendment right to effective representation, you have to show two things: (1) that some error occurred, and (2) that the error prejudiced you in a way that calls the results of the case into question. You have to show a "reasonable probability" that the results of trial would have been different. You don't have to prove innocence (it helps), but you've got to show more than just "this hurt my case." Here, it's easy to see how a jury could have believed an alibi about Adnan's whereabouts. There was no definitive evidence about where he was -- just circumstantial evidence that was dubious.


I don't practice in Maryland and am not well-versed in Maryland appellate procedure, but it looks like the State (or Adnan) might ask a higher court -- the Maryland Court of Appeals -- to review the decision. It doesn't look like either side has a right to appeal to this court and would have to ask for that court to review.


Like you, I'm anxiously awaiting a Sarah Koenig update...


Recent Posts


lethal injection Mike Hubbard eric sterling foley alabama adger alabama economic growth arson Neil Gorsuch gun rights brian fredick lucas talladega superspeedway oneonta alabama illegal gun carry 28 U.S.C. § 2254 battles v state Rule 32 montgomery alabama banville v state editorial marion county florence alabama fraud fraudulent checks bessemer alabama criminal mischief sixth amendment pelham alabama terell corey mcmullin attempted murder drug possession, church robberies Benn v State Etowah County Alabama, alfonso morris springville alabama moore v texas state of arizona minor offenses shelby county the mannequin challenge benjamin todd acton greene county alabama mountain brook alabama Woods v State drug activity fake kidnapping, calhoun county alabama npr shoplifting West Alabama street racing public assistance fraud parole § 13A-3-23 sexual assault criminal justice reform, dekalb county alabama netflix sarah koenig maryland court of special appeals midazolam Shonda Walker, Dylann Roof department of justice ring v arizona Briarwood Presbyterian Church state of alabama strickland v washington Walker County Alabama second amendment Pleasant Grove Alabama aziz sayyed alabama law enforcement agency alabama supreme court moving violations morris alabama court systems, texas Kareem Dacar Gaymon Justice Sotomayor keith v state bernard v north dakota home repair fraud hoax destructive devices levins v state constitutional law, concealed carry fort payne alabama operation bullseye south carolina brady v maryland legende v state bomb threat mcwilliams v dunn § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing tuscaloosa alabama nathan woods serial Fentanyl blountsville alabama brookside alabama negligent homicide abuse eighth amendment, capital punishment christian guitierez fultondale alabama trussville alabama cherokee county alabama Malone v State shooting death birchfield v north dakota madison alabama armed robbery judicial override domestic abuse alabama stoves v state aiding and abetting homicide rate Marengo County Alabama Easter blount county alabama campbell v state capital murder dora alabama theft of property pruitt v state Ingmire v State sheffield v state executions theft clarence thomas Tracie Todd Jefferson County Alabama SCOTUS, mccalla alabama heritage christian university debit card skimming scams lauderdale county alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix OJ Simpson Made in America narcotics investigation jerry bohannon self defense beylund v north dakota court of criminal appeal releases sentencing law and policy blog summaries avondale alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth felony assaults unlawful manufacturing drug seizure eleventh circuit ruling death penalty, animal cruelty Adamsville alabama hurst mandamus apprendi v new jersey hoover alabama towles v state breaking and entering fairfield alabama, drug smuggling Lucky D Arcade st clair county alabama hall v florida Guy Terrell Junior anniston alabama, Glaze v State tarrant alabama eugene lee jones v state Tommy Arthur US Supreme Court Update kidnapping ake v oklahoma road rage betton v state stanley brent chapman prostitution sting cullman alabama hurst v florida assault 2016 election, mount olive alabama mike gilotti russell calhoun pell city alabama criminal justice limestone county alabama pinson alabama heflin alabama steve avery department of justice, gadsden alabama LWOP peyton pruitt Eutaw Alabama capital offenses baldwin county alabama kenneth eugene billups scotus boaz alabama morgan county alabama illegal gambling OJ Simpson smith v state car accident fourth amendment adnan syed, operation crackdown birmingham alabama Gardendale Alabama edwards v arizona crime of passion gun control New York Times murder mulga alabama endangerment of a child warrantless blood draws Xavier Beasley Sardis Alabama social media underage drinking identity theft drug busts Kay Ivey albertville alabama rainbow city alabama lethal injection drugs Joshua Reese burglary Thomas Hardiman dothan alabama baltimore city circuit court court of criminal appeals huntsville debtor prison ferguson missouri Alonzo Ephraim CCA update nicholas hawkins huntsville alabama lamar county bailey v us asia mcclain implied consent death penalty brendan dassey homicide abduction christmas shooting drug crimes Donald Trump, warrior alabama utah supreme court ex parte briseno hanceville alabama john earle redfearn IV v state robberies Samuel Alito utah v strieff Stephen Breyer habeas corpus relief Hillary Clinton, mobile alabama domestic violence making a murderer forced isolation shooting Alabaster alabama embezzlement decatur alabama constitutional violations William Pryor alabama criminal law roundup abandonment kimberly alabama drug trafficking,



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.