CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Adnan Syed of "Serial" Granted New Trial

J.D. Lloyd - Thursday, March 29, 2018

(Image Credit: Getty Images)


In the ongoing case of Adnan Syed, made famous by NPR's "Serial" podcast, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals has ruled in Adnan's favor and has ordered that he be granted a new trial. In a long decision, the Court determined that Adnan's trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to investigate Asia McClain, a witness who purportedly could have provided Adnan with a crucial alibi for the window of time he was allegedly killing Hae Min Lee in a Best Buy parking lot.



The case was on appeal by both Adnan and the State of Maryland. In the Baltimore City Circuit Court, Adnan had been granted a new trial based upon counsel's failure to question the State's cell phone tower data expert about a warning on a fax cover sheet to the data that warned about the data's unreliability. The circuit court had rejected the claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate Asia. Both sides appealed their adverse rulings.


And both sides won. The Court of Special Appeals reached the opposite conclusions than that of the Baltimore City Circuit Court. The Court found the circuit court was wrong to grant Adnan relief on the fax cover sheet issue, but was also wrong to deny relief based on counsel's failure to investigate Asia's alibi. The Court explained:
McClain’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, would have made it impossible for Syed to have murdered Hae. Trial counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced Syed’s defense, because, but for trial counsel’s failure to investigate, there is a reasonable probability that McClain’s alibi testimony would have raised a reasonable doubt in the mind of at least one juror about Syed’s involvement Hae’s murder, and thus “the result of the proceedings would have been different."


When you're complaining that your trial counsel screwed up and denied you your Sixth Amendment right to effective representation, you have to show two things: (1) that some error occurred, and (2) that the error prejudiced you in a way that calls the results of the case into question. You have to show a "reasonable probability" that the results of trial would have been different. You don't have to prove innocence (it helps), but you've got to show more than just "this hurt my case." Here, it's easy to see how a jury could have believed an alibi about Adnan's whereabouts. There was no definitive evidence about where he was -- just circumstantial evidence that was dubious.


I don't practice in Maryland and am not well-versed in Maryland appellate procedure, but it looks like the State (or Adnan) might ask a higher court -- the Maryland Court of Appeals -- to review the decision. It doesn't look like either side has a right to appeal to this court and would have to ask for that court to review.


Like you, I'm anxiously awaiting a Sarah Koenig update...


Recent Posts


concealed carry LWOP negligent homicide ring v arizona gun control Briarwood Presbyterian Church shooting Donald Trump, Xavier Beasley hurst mandamus anniston alabama, operation crackdown marion county assault criminal justice russell calhoun morgan county alabama Kay Ivey gadsden alabama death penalty OJ Simpson street racing lamar county Ingmire v State fraud beylund v north dakota Etowah County Alabama, Alonzo Ephraim Hillary Clinton, morris alabama keith v state npr crime of passion ex parte briseno eugene lee jones v state § 13A-3-23 levins v state car accident pell city alabama shelby county nicholas hawkins brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix death penalty, lethal injection drugs maryland court of special appeals clarence thomas brookside alabama identity theft bessemer alabama mcwilliams v dunn Lucky D Arcade criminal mischief hall v florida mount olive alabama public assistance fraud state of alabama court systems, brady v maryland foley alabama florence alabama hurst v florida Adamsville alabama mobile alabama bernard v north dakota Benn v State ake v oklahoma john earle redfearn IV v state drug possession, talladega superspeedway serial moore v texas domestic abuse hanceville alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon theft state of arizona West Alabama fort payne alabama Easter robberies huntsville alabama christian guitierez sixth amendment trussville alabama heflin alabama illegal gun carry lethal injection criminal justice reform, shoplifting springville alabama attempted murder alabama OJ Simpson Made in America department of justice court of criminal appeal releases steve avery alabama criminal law roundup sentencing law and policy blog summaries texas limestone county alabama christmas shooting midazolam fairfield alabama, asia mcclain Alabaster alabama operation bullseye moving violations habeas corpus relief fourth amendment dothan alabama strickland v washington Shonda Walker, Rule 32 Guy Terrell Junior edwards v arizona alabama supreme court capital murder sheffield v state benjamin todd acton church robberies pinson alabama decatur alabama homicide abandonment shooting death baldwin county alabama banville v state south carolina aziz sayyed stanley brent chapman second amendment cherokee county alabama Stephen Breyer battles v state lauderdale county alabama fake kidnapping, dekalb county alabama adger alabama implied consent sarah koenig birchfield v north dakota Marengo County Alabama drug busts Tommy Arthur apprendi v new jersey illegal gambling terell corey mcmullin 28 U.S.C. § 2254 brendan dassey Wesley Adam Whitworth Pleasant Grove Alabama sexual assault blount county alabama mccalla alabama the mannequin challenge Jefferson County Alabama Walker County Alabama bomb threat William Pryor executions Fentanyl arson abduction pelham alabama eighth amendment, betton v state unlawful manufacturing hoover alabama abuse netflix animal cruelty armed robbery Sardis Alabama New York Times madison alabama drug smuggling Thomas Hardiman court of criminal appeals mountain brook alabama Tracie Todd kimberly alabama self defense minor offenses road rage huntsville blountsville alabama parole narcotics investigation brian fredick lucas mulga alabama cullman alabama tuscaloosa alabama pruitt v state oneonta alabama adnan syed, judicial override felony assaults social media § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing making a murderer Justice Sotomayor forced isolation Neil Gorsuch theft of property calhoun county alabama endangerment of a child fultondale alabama nathan woods gun rights capital punishment heritage christian university scotus utah v strieff greene county alabama domestic violence Joshua Reese dora alabama Dylann Roof drug activity department of justice, mike gilotti warrantless blood draws murder eric sterling bailey v us stoves v state US Supreme Court Update warrior alabama boaz alabama peyton pruitt birmingham alabama constitutional violations aiding and abetting utah supreme court ferguson missouri fraudulent checks prostitution sting eleventh circuit ruling smith v state constitutional law, st clair county alabama baltimore city circuit court hoax destructive devices alfonso morris drug crimes campbell v state Gardendale Alabama alabama law enforcement agency CCA update underage drinking editorial homicide rate home repair fraud Eutaw Alabama debtor prison drug trafficking, towles v state Malone v State Glaze v State avondale alabama Mike Hubbard Samuel Alito capital offenses 2016 election, jerry bohannon economic growth Woods v State SCOTUS, embezzlement albertville alabama burglary montgomery alabama legende v state breaking and entering kenneth eugene billups tarrant alabama kidnapping debit card skimming scams rainbow city alabama drug seizure



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.