CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Adnan Syed of "Serial" Granted New Trial

J.D. Lloyd - Thursday, March 29, 2018

(Image Credit: Getty Images)


In the ongoing case of Adnan Syed, made famous by NPR's "Serial" podcast, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals has ruled in Adnan's favor and has ordered that he be granted a new trial. In a long decision, the Court determined that Adnan's trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to investigate Asia McClain, a witness who purportedly could have provided Adnan with a crucial alibi for the window of time he was allegedly killing Hae Min Lee in a Best Buy parking lot.



The case was on appeal by both Adnan and the State of Maryland. In the Baltimore City Circuit Court, Adnan had been granted a new trial based upon counsel's failure to question the State's cell phone tower data expert about a warning on a fax cover sheet to the data that warned about the data's unreliability. The circuit court had rejected the claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate Asia. Both sides appealed their adverse rulings.


And both sides won. The Court of Special Appeals reached the opposite conclusions than that of the Baltimore City Circuit Court. The Court found the circuit court was wrong to grant Adnan relief on the fax cover sheet issue, but was also wrong to deny relief based on counsel's failure to investigate Asia's alibi. The Court explained:
McClain’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, would have made it impossible for Syed to have murdered Hae. Trial counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced Syed’s defense, because, but for trial counsel’s failure to investigate, there is a reasonable probability that McClain’s alibi testimony would have raised a reasonable doubt in the mind of at least one juror about Syed’s involvement Hae’s murder, and thus “the result of the proceedings would have been different."


When you're complaining that your trial counsel screwed up and denied you your Sixth Amendment right to effective representation, you have to show two things: (1) that some error occurred, and (2) that the error prejudiced you in a way that calls the results of the case into question. You have to show a "reasonable probability" that the results of trial would have been different. You don't have to prove innocence (it helps), but you've got to show more than just "this hurt my case." Here, it's easy to see how a jury could have believed an alibi about Adnan's whereabouts. There was no definitive evidence about where he was -- just circumstantial evidence that was dubious.


I don't practice in Maryland and am not well-versed in Maryland appellate procedure, but it looks like the State (or Adnan) might ask a higher court -- the Maryland Court of Appeals -- to review the decision. It doesn't look like either side has a right to appeal to this court and would have to ask for that court to review.


Like you, I'm anxiously awaiting a Sarah Koenig update...


Recent Posts


huntsville alabama domestic abuse limestone county alabama marion county judicial override constitutional violations prostitution sting capital offenses drug possession, Neil Gorsuch making a murderer scotus oneonta alabama fourth amendment Rule 32 mount olive alabama keith v state montgomery alabama crime of passion legende v state ring v arizona endangerment of a child dothan alabama arson strickland v washington peyton pruitt Pleasant Grove Alabama Dylann Roof road rage pell city alabama death penalty, Hillary Clinton, street racing court systems, pinson alabama sexual assault eugene lee jones v state netflix murder christmas shooting npr sarah koenig aiding and abetting kenneth eugene billups Samuel Alito benjamin todd acton calhoun county alabama lethal injection drugs Benn v State bernard v north dakota Tracie Todd Guy Terrell Junior adger alabama Alonzo Ephraim illegal gun carry Wesley Adam Whitworth nathan woods social media hoax destructive devices drug activity Eutaw Alabama 2016 election, mike gilotti theft of property editorial blountsville alabama underage drinking Lucky D Arcade Ingmire v State hanceville alabama st clair county alabama steve avery mulga alabama banville v state edwards v arizona warrantless blood draws anniston alabama, tuscaloosa alabama moving violations abuse decatur alabama greene county alabama christian guitierez illegal gambling the mannequin challenge cullman alabama US Supreme Court Update foley alabama kimberly alabama constitutional law, fairfield alabama, Fentanyl department of justice, stanley brent chapman New York Times hoover alabama sentencing law and policy blog summaries criminal justice Marengo County Alabama West Alabama eric sterling fraudulent checks felony assaults levins v state kidnapping mcwilliams v dunn huntsville narcotics investigation midazolam betton v state hurst mandamus operation bullseye embezzlement burglary debtor prison Sardis Alabama moore v texas mobile alabama shooting death Etowah County Alabama, brian fredick lucas florence alabama economic growth bailey v us smith v state capital punishment eighth amendment, Thomas Hardiman rainbow city alabama SCOTUS, Gardendale Alabama LWOP beylund v north dakota drug crimes drug trafficking, stoves v state car accident fraud alabama criminal law roundup bessemer alabama pelham alabama trussville alabama OJ Simpson Made in America court of criminal appeals aziz sayyed tarrant alabama brady v maryland sixth amendment terell corey mcmullin alabama supreme court nicholas hawkins morgan county alabama Jefferson County Alabama talladega superspeedway drug smuggling § 13A-3-23 boaz alabama cherokee county alabama parole dora alabama shoplifting armed robbery homicide rate church robberies home repair fraud hall v florida ex parte briseno OJ Simpson hurst v florida russell calhoun Adamsville alabama state of arizona shooting identity theft alabama law enforcement agency utah v strieff jerry bohannon utah supreme court minor offenses blount county alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing department of justice brookside alabama public assistance fraud ferguson missouri gun rights eleventh circuit ruling texas Tommy Arthur fort payne alabama unlawful manufacturing baldwin county alabama Mike Hubbard lethal injection criminal justice reform, Stephen Breyer Shonda Walker, morris alabama attempted murder clarence thomas court of criminal appeal releases Joshua Reese bomb threat Briarwood Presbyterian Church battles v state albertville alabama drug seizure sheffield v state asia mcclain birmingham alabama Justice Sotomayor criminal mischief south carolina Malone v State apprendi v new jersey negligent homicide gun control dekalb county alabama death penalty Easter john earle redfearn IV v state capital murder brendan dassey concealed carry gadsden alabama pruitt v state abandonment executions self defense breaking and entering Xavier Beasley Kareem Dacar Gaymon Donald Trump, fake kidnapping, alfonso morris campbell v state alabama abduction operation crackdown assault mccalla alabama mountain brook alabama domestic violence towles v state homicide robberies heritage christian university springville alabama second amendment lauderdale county alabama theft debit card skimming scams implied consent fultondale alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus relief serial Woods v State lamar county Alabaster alabama avondale alabama Walker County Alabama forced isolation adnan syed, William Pryor brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix state of alabama maryland court of special appeals warrior alabama ake v oklahoma CCA update animal cruelty drug busts heflin alabama madison alabama Glaze v State birchfield v north dakota shelby county Kay Ivey baltimore city circuit court



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.