CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Adnan Syed of "Serial" Granted New Trial

J.D. Lloyd - Thursday, March 29, 2018

(Image Credit: Getty Images)


In the ongoing case of Adnan Syed, made famous by NPR's "Serial" podcast, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals has ruled in Adnan's favor and has ordered that he be granted a new trial. In a long decision, the Court determined that Adnan's trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to investigate Asia McClain, a witness who purportedly could have provided Adnan with a crucial alibi for the window of time he was allegedly killing Hae Min Lee in a Best Buy parking lot.



The case was on appeal by both Adnan and the State of Maryland. In the Baltimore City Circuit Court, Adnan had been granted a new trial based upon counsel's failure to question the State's cell phone tower data expert about a warning on a fax cover sheet to the data that warned about the data's unreliability. The circuit court had rejected the claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate Asia. Both sides appealed their adverse rulings.


And both sides won. The Court of Special Appeals reached the opposite conclusions than that of the Baltimore City Circuit Court. The Court found the circuit court was wrong to grant Adnan relief on the fax cover sheet issue, but was also wrong to deny relief based on counsel's failure to investigate Asia's alibi. The Court explained:
McClain’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, would have made it impossible for Syed to have murdered Hae. Trial counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced Syed’s defense, because, but for trial counsel’s failure to investigate, there is a reasonable probability that McClain’s alibi testimony would have raised a reasonable doubt in the mind of at least one juror about Syed’s involvement Hae’s murder, and thus “the result of the proceedings would have been different."


When you're complaining that your trial counsel screwed up and denied you your Sixth Amendment right to effective representation, you have to show two things: (1) that some error occurred, and (2) that the error prejudiced you in a way that calls the results of the case into question. You have to show a "reasonable probability" that the results of trial would have been different. You don't have to prove innocence (it helps), but you've got to show more than just "this hurt my case." Here, it's easy to see how a jury could have believed an alibi about Adnan's whereabouts. There was no definitive evidence about where he was -- just circumstantial evidence that was dubious.


I don't practice in Maryland and am not well-versed in Maryland appellate procedure, but it looks like the State (or Adnan) might ask a higher court -- the Maryland Court of Appeals -- to review the decision. It doesn't look like either side has a right to appeal to this court and would have to ask for that court to review.


Like you, I'm anxiously awaiting a Sarah Koenig update...


Recent Posts


bessemer alabama parole Dylann Roof lethal injection drugs department of justice, marion county domestic violence Wesley Adam Whitworth stoves v state tarrant alabama church robberies theft greene county alabama tuscaloosa alabama sheffield v state Eutaw Alabama debit card skimming scams hurst mandamus eric sterling breaking and entering shelby county criminal justice reform, OJ Simpson Made in America christmas shooting pinson alabama ferguson missouri Ingmire v State mount olive alabama CCA update homicide aiding and abetting betton v state Adamsville alabama eleventh circuit ruling fake kidnapping, dekalb county alabama court of criminal appeal releases madison alabama blount county alabama baltimore city circuit court hoover alabama alabama supreme court endangerment of a child fultondale alabama fourth amendment state of arizona kimberly alabama home repair fraud netflix animal cruelty § 13A-3-23 decatur alabama shooting death birchfield v north dakota operation bullseye operation crackdown midazolam brookside alabama constitutional law, debtor prison Glaze v State birmingham alabama banville v state utah supreme court capital offenses habeas corpus relief npr kidnapping bernard v north dakota pelham alabama gun control forced isolation Briarwood Presbyterian Church Mike Hubbard john earle redfearn IV v state unlawful manufacturing Donald Trump, felony assaults theft of property boaz alabama drug trafficking, alabama pruitt v state nathan woods legende v state narcotics investigation sentencing law and policy blog summaries Stephen Breyer court systems, Tracie Todd alfonso morris asia mcclain US Supreme Court Update Benn v State underage drinking baldwin county alabama trussville alabama burglary montgomery alabama brady v maryland implied consent ring v arizona talladega superspeedway capital murder street racing fort payne alabama Joshua Reese florence alabama Alonzo Ephraim illegal gun carry public assistance fraud calhoun county alabama russell calhoun battles v state abandonment Kay Ivey West Alabama Hillary Clinton, 2016 election, drug activity kenneth eugene billups Xavier Beasley hall v florida drug seizure rainbow city alabama death penalty domestic abuse edwards v arizona Jefferson County Alabama second amendment murder huntsville 28 U.S.C. § 2254 south carolina alabama law enforcement agency Thomas Hardiman ex parte briseno fairfield alabama, the mannequin challenge sixth amendment heritage christian university brendan dassey criminal justice crime of passion Kareem Dacar Gaymon foley alabama clarence thomas peyton pruitt judicial override Alabaster alabama serial anniston alabama, adnan syed, maryland court of special appeals oneonta alabama sexual assault constitutional violations dora alabama shooting stanley brent chapman criminal mischief Easter negligent homicide homicide rate arson blountsville alabama hurst v florida prostitution sting Etowah County Alabama, road rage Fentanyl nicholas hawkins mccalla alabama car accident self defense smith v state New York Times bailey v us identity theft embezzlement st clair county alabama terell corey mcmullin texas pell city alabama making a murderer department of justice hanceville alabama Shonda Walker, economic growth brian fredick lucas Tommy Arthur eugene lee jones v state steve avery Pleasant Grove Alabama Gardendale Alabama aziz sayyed apprendi v new jersey attempted murder towles v state mcwilliams v dunn Woods v State drug possession, eighth amendment, sarah koenig Lucky D Arcade warrior alabama assault morgan county alabama fraudulent checks abuse cherokee county alabama Sardis Alabama Justice Sotomayor gun rights capital punishment morris alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix armed robbery strickland v washington beylund v north dakota drug crimes jerry bohannon benjamin todd acton alabama criminal law roundup heflin alabama scotus levins v state bomb threat Neil Gorsuch Walker County Alabama gadsden alabama mountain brook alabama SCOTUS, campbell v state keith v state OJ Simpson § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing lethal injection drug smuggling Guy Terrell Junior drug busts warrantless blood draws Rule 32 moore v texas robberies Malone v State utah v strieff social media dothan alabama mulga alabama mike gilotti editorial springville alabama christian guitierez hoax destructive devices adger alabama Marengo County Alabama LWOP state of alabama executions cullman alabama Samuel Alito moving violations illegal gambling minor offenses avondale alabama shoplifting death penalty, albertville alabama ake v oklahoma fraud court of criminal appeals abduction concealed carry limestone county alabama lauderdale county alabama William Pryor huntsville alabama lamar county mobile alabama



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.