CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Adnan Syed of "Serial" Granted New Trial

J.D. Lloyd - Thursday, March 29, 2018

(Image Credit: Getty Images)


In the ongoing case of Adnan Syed, made famous by NPR's "Serial" podcast, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals has ruled in Adnan's favor and has ordered that he be granted a new trial. In a long decision, the Court determined that Adnan's trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to investigate Asia McClain, a witness who purportedly could have provided Adnan with a crucial alibi for the window of time he was allegedly killing Hae Min Lee in a Best Buy parking lot.



The case was on appeal by both Adnan and the State of Maryland. In the Baltimore City Circuit Court, Adnan had been granted a new trial based upon counsel's failure to question the State's cell phone tower data expert about a warning on a fax cover sheet to the data that warned about the data's unreliability. The circuit court had rejected the claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate Asia. Both sides appealed their adverse rulings.


And both sides won. The Court of Special Appeals reached the opposite conclusions than that of the Baltimore City Circuit Court. The Court found the circuit court was wrong to grant Adnan relief on the fax cover sheet issue, but was also wrong to deny relief based on counsel's failure to investigate Asia's alibi. The Court explained:
McClain’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, would have made it impossible for Syed to have murdered Hae. Trial counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced Syed’s defense, because, but for trial counsel’s failure to investigate, there is a reasonable probability that McClain’s alibi testimony would have raised a reasonable doubt in the mind of at least one juror about Syed’s involvement Hae’s murder, and thus “the result of the proceedings would have been different."


When you're complaining that your trial counsel screwed up and denied you your Sixth Amendment right to effective representation, you have to show two things: (1) that some error occurred, and (2) that the error prejudiced you in a way that calls the results of the case into question. You have to show a "reasonable probability" that the results of trial would have been different. You don't have to prove innocence (it helps), but you've got to show more than just "this hurt my case." Here, it's easy to see how a jury could have believed an alibi about Adnan's whereabouts. There was no definitive evidence about where he was -- just circumstantial evidence that was dubious.


I don't practice in Maryland and am not well-versed in Maryland appellate procedure, but it looks like the State (or Adnan) might ask a higher court -- the Maryland Court of Appeals -- to review the decision. It doesn't look like either side has a right to appeal to this court and would have to ask for that court to review.


Like you, I'm anxiously awaiting a Sarah Koenig update...


Recent Posts


montgomery alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon baldwin county alabama ring v arizona pruitt v state sarah koenig identity theft morris alabama shooting economic growth Stephen Breyer Marengo County Alabama death penalty ex parte briseno alabama supreme court making a murderer netflix drug possession, editorial Justice Sotomayor robberies limestone county alabama criminal justice Alabaster alabama south carolina tarrant alabama drug trafficking, judicial override US Supreme Court Update peyton pruitt lamar county shooting death Briarwood Presbyterian Church concealed carry russell calhoun bomb threat drug crimes maryland court of special appeals bessemer alabama birchfield v north dakota trussville alabama domestic violence hall v florida oneonta alabama state of arizona nicholas hawkins lethal injection drugs assault heflin alabama heritage christian university birmingham alabama fake kidnapping, murder mountain brook alabama benjamin todd acton aziz sayyed CCA update utah supreme court abduction Tracie Todd LWOP drug busts scotus fultondale alabama street racing eric sterling tuscaloosa alabama mount olive alabama minor offenses smith v state christian guitierez springville alabama pell city alabama asia mcclain West Alabama kidnapping florence alabama shoplifting hoover alabama constitutional violations moore v texas court of criminal appeals adger alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama theft of property homicide rate Gardendale Alabama felony assaults Thomas Hardiman decatur alabama calhoun county alabama illegal gun carry criminal justice reform, public assistance fraud lauderdale county alabama brendan dassey social media mike gilotti apprendi v new jersey executions warrior alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix alfonso morris Woods v State sixth amendment dekalb county alabama towles v state rainbow city alabama fort payne alabama debtor prison Samuel Alito Dylann Roof fairfield alabama, st clair county alabama forced isolation § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing Benn v State marion county Fentanyl lethal injection Rule 32 anniston alabama, § 13A-3-23 gadsden alabama narcotics investigation fraud gun rights foley alabama christmas shooting drug seizure strickland v washington criminal mischief alabama criminal law roundup baltimore city circuit court clarence thomas betton v state steve avery Easter campbell v state levins v state cullman alabama jerry bohannon alabama Glaze v State huntsville alabama the mannequin challenge abuse bernard v north dakota john earle redfearn IV v state embezzlement serial beylund v north dakota hurst v florida arson ferguson missouri blount county alabama Joshua Reese drug activity 28 U.S.C. § 2254 department of justice theft Mike Hubbard sexual assault Donald Trump, texas habeas corpus relief Eutaw Alabama stoves v state banville v state Hillary Clinton, terell corey mcmullin court of criminal appeal releases Alonzo Ephraim boaz alabama brian fredick lucas parole SCOTUS, kimberly alabama mcwilliams v dunn car accident church robberies eugene lee jones v state Sardis Alabama keith v state Ingmire v State attempted murder capital offenses Walker County Alabama sentencing law and policy blog summaries adnan syed, bailey v us road rage domestic abuse death penalty, state of alabama blountsville alabama animal cruelty Jefferson County Alabama debit card skimming scams brookside alabama OJ Simpson fourth amendment Etowah County Alabama, legende v state capital punishment home repair fraud eighth amendment, albertville alabama shelby county madison alabama armed robbery underage drinking prostitution sting dora alabama operation bullseye edwards v arizona breaking and entering alabama law enforcement agency gun control abandonment ake v oklahoma Shonda Walker, midazolam cherokee county alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth OJ Simpson Made in America unlawful manufacturing Guy Terrell Junior aiding and abetting Tommy Arthur mobile alabama talladega superspeedway mulga alabama department of justice, Kay Ivey sheffield v state illegal gambling drug smuggling morgan county alabama mccalla alabama crime of passion burglary kenneth eugene billups New York Times brady v maryland nathan woods npr court systems, hurst mandamus warrantless blood draws Neil Gorsuch utah v strieff implied consent Lucky D Arcade endangerment of a child 2016 election, homicide second amendment self defense Malone v State hoax destructive devices dothan alabama pelham alabama huntsville negligent homicide greene county alabama fraudulent checks William Pryor eleventh circuit ruling Adamsville alabama moving violations pinson alabama constitutional law, stanley brent chapman Xavier Beasley operation crackdown battles v state avondale alabama capital murder hanceville alabama



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.