CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.


J.D. Lloyd - Friday, May 06, 2016

Eugene Lee Jones v. State (CR-14-1332)


Jones was convicted of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder, stemming from him killing a woman he suspected of setting him up in a robbery. Jones voluntarily talked to investigators on July 29, 2013, in connection to the death, but eventually stopped the questioning when he invoked his right to counsel. Jones was arrested on an outstanding warrant out of Bessemer. Jones was eventually transported back to Lauderdale County on another warrant stemming from a charge unrelated to the homicide. While still in custody, Jones was asked to submit to a polygraph examination. Jones waived his Miranda rights, submitted to the polygraph, and subsequently made another statement in which he admitted that he strangled the victim. Jones moved to suppress this statement under Edwards v. AZ, 451 US 477 (1981) on the grounds that investigators improperly re-initiated contact after he had invoked his right to counsel. The circuit court denied the motion. AFFIRMED. Relying on MD v. Shatzer, 559 US 98 (2010), the CCA affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress on the grounds that “coercive effect” of re-initiation of interrogation wasn’t present in this case like it was in Edwards. Essentially, the Court held that if enough time has passed since the initial invocation of the right to counsel -- more than 14 days -- there is no presumptively problematic re-initiation as there was in Edwards.


Levins v. State (CR-15-0612)


Bell v. State (CR-15-0618)

The appellants in these two cases were two expungement petitioners who were denied relief at the circuit court level and asked the CCA to reverse the denials of their petitions. APPEALS DISMISSED One may only challenge the denial of their expungement petition by petitioning the Alabama Supreme Court for certiorari review of the denial of the petition for expungement.

John Earle Redfearn, IV v. State (CR-14-0500)


This case involved the denial of a motion to suppress drugs evidence recovered from Redfearn’s body. In February 2012, law enforcement obtained a search warrant of Redfearn’s residence based upon 2 controlled buys that occurred at the residence with Redfearn. Law enforcement executed the SW after they observed Redfearn drive away from the house. He was stopped several miles away while the search of the house was going on and taken back to the house by the detaining officers. While executing the warrant, Redfearn’s girlfriend arrived at the house and eventually told the officers that Redfearn keeps drugs on his person. An officer strip-searched Redfearn at the residence and recovered a bottle containing oxycodone pills in his underwear. Redfearn moved to suppress under Bailey v. US, 133 S.Ct. 1031 (2013). AFFIRMED. The CCA explained that while Bailey held that a suspect may be lawfully detained while police are conducting a search warrant only when the person is in the "immediate vicinity" of the place to be searched, Redfearn was properly detained because the police had probable cause to arrest him based upon the controlled buys previously carried out with Redfearn and observed by law enforcement.


Nathaniel Woods (CR-10-0695)

Alfonso Morris (CR-11-1925)

John Russell Calhoun (CR-14-0779)

In these three cases, the CCA affirmed the denial of Rule 32 relief for death-row inmates without holding evidentiary hearings. There’s not much that’s noteworthy in these opinions outside of the observation that the petitions were summarily denied because each petitioner failed to plead sufficient facts that, if proven true, could entitle them to relief. The vast majority of the factual claims in the three petitions were bare-boned factual allegations. In Woods and Morris, petitioners raised claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present certain expert testimony at trial. The CCA affirmed the summary dismissal of these claims because the petitioner failed to identify an expert and what that expert’s testimony would have been at the pleading stage. It bears repeating that if you’re going to raise an IAC claim, in order to be entitled to a hearing, you have to give the circuit court sufficient factual allegations that the court can conclude that your claims could entitle you to relief if proven true. In the context of IAC based on the failure to call certain expert witnesses, you need to make a proffer as to who that expert would have been and what the testimony would have been at the pleading stage.


Brian Fredick Lucas (CR-14-0744)


Lucas was convicted of first-degree attempted sodomy by forcible compulsion and first-degree sexual abuse stemming from an incident in which he allegedly touched his step-daughter on the mouth with his penis while she was sleeping. The CCA reversed his first-degree sodomy conviction on the grounds that the State’s showing did not present evidence of forcible compulsion -- there was no threat by Lucas or evidence that his actions overcame her earnest resistance. The CCA did enter a judgment convicting Lucas of attempted sexual misconduct.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


christian guitierez Jefferson County Alabama blount county alabama florence alabama executions hurst v florida sentencing law and policy blog summaries Stephen Breyer alabama law enforcement agency fraudulent checks tarrant alabama ferguson missouri eighth amendment, SCOTUS, concealed carry birmingham alabama hanceville alabama greene county alabama mulga alabama baldwin county alabama domestic violence alabama supreme court constitutional violations capital offenses street racing hoax destructive devices smith v state burglary 2016 election, warrantless blood draws capital murder Tracie Todd trussville alabama Ingmire v State cherokee county alabama battles v state drug possession, limestone county alabama stanley brent chapman domestic abuse assault endangerment of a child Pleasant Grove Alabama self defense sheffield v state court systems, lethal injection drugs Xavier Beasley illegal gambling john earle redfearn IV v state Glaze v State William Pryor homicide homicide rate morgan county alabama Justice Sotomayor eleventh circuit ruling underage drinking hurst mandamus south carolina embezzlement crime of passion serial sarah koenig fort payne alabama economic growth the mannequin challenge judicial override Kay Ivey brian fredick lucas marion county Woods v State ring v arizona drug seizure illegal gun carry strickland v washington abduction gun control shooting New York Times Thomas Hardiman mccalla alabama theft cullman alabama Eutaw Alabama oneonta alabama Joshua Reese mobile alabama Fentanyl prostitution sting hall v florida theft of property capital punishment maryland court of special appeals moore v texas scotus fairfield alabama, Dylann Roof court of criminal appeals Benn v State st clair county alabama huntsville tuscaloosa alabama dothan alabama keith v state mike gilotti 28 U.S.C. § 2254 benjamin todd acton Alonzo Ephraim Etowah County Alabama, jerry bohannon dekalb county alabama christmas shooting Samuel Alito rainbow city alabama abuse stoves v state apprendi v new jersey avondale alabama baltimore city circuit court animal cruelty adnan syed, Easter lauderdale county alabama kenneth eugene billups criminal mischief operation bullseye brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix towles v state netflix department of justice shooting death Sardis Alabama morris alabama bessemer alabama drug activity § 13A-3-23 narcotics investigation Hillary Clinton, arson Adamsville alabama identity theft ake v oklahoma state of arizona LWOP bomb threat Neil Gorsuch department of justice, debit card skimming scams habeas corpus relief warrior alabama criminal justice reform, implied consent clarence thomas albertville alabama springville alabama breaking and entering Alabaster alabama sixth amendment § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing social media making a murderer drug smuggling fake kidnapping, OJ Simpson hoover alabama parole heflin alabama pelham alabama church robberies alabama Lucky D Arcade aziz sayyed gun rights car accident Tommy Arthur forced isolation alfonso morris campbell v state Gardendale Alabama attempted murder road rage moving violations dora alabama edwards v arizona murder editorial state of alabama aiding and abetting negligent homicide lamar county constitutional law, minor offenses eugene lee jones v state felony assaults asia mcclain utah v strieff pell city alabama brookside alabama drug busts anniston alabama, birchfield v north dakota robberies bailey v us brendan dassey heritage christian university eric sterling kimberly alabama fourth amendment beylund v north dakota armed robbery OJ Simpson Made in America Shonda Walker, steve avery debtor prison adger alabama shelby county death penalty bernard v north dakota Malone v State lethal injection public assistance fraud nicholas hawkins second amendment texas Briarwood Presbyterian Church home repair fraud Kareem Dacar Gaymon criminal justice alabama criminal law roundup abandonment US Supreme Court Update pruitt v state West Alabama talladega superspeedway montgomery alabama pinson alabama fraud sexual assault fultondale alabama midazolam CCA update brady v maryland gadsden alabama Walker County Alabama terell corey mcmullin shoplifting ex parte briseno npr utah supreme court blountsville alabama mcwilliams v dunn death penalty, Guy Terrell Junior Donald Trump, drug trafficking, legende v state mount olive alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth operation crackdown nathan woods levins v state boaz alabama madison alabama mountain brook alabama court of criminal appeal releases decatur alabama betton v state banville v state peyton pruitt foley alabama huntsville alabama russell calhoun Rule 32 Marengo County Alabama Mike Hubbard drug crimes calhoun county alabama unlawful manufacturing kidnapping



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.