CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.


J.D. Lloyd - Friday, May 06, 2016

Eugene Lee Jones v. State (CR-14-1332)


Jones was convicted of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder, stemming from him killing a woman he suspected of setting him up in a robbery. Jones voluntarily talked to investigators on July 29, 2013, in connection to the death, but eventually stopped the questioning when he invoked his right to counsel. Jones was arrested on an outstanding warrant out of Bessemer. Jones was eventually transported back to Lauderdale County on another warrant stemming from a charge unrelated to the homicide. While still in custody, Jones was asked to submit to a polygraph examination. Jones waived his Miranda rights, submitted to the polygraph, and subsequently made another statement in which he admitted that he strangled the victim. Jones moved to suppress this statement under Edwards v. AZ, 451 US 477 (1981) on the grounds that investigators improperly re-initiated contact after he had invoked his right to counsel. The circuit court denied the motion. AFFIRMED. Relying on MD v. Shatzer, 559 US 98 (2010), the CCA affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress on the grounds that “coercive effect” of re-initiation of interrogation wasn’t present in this case like it was in Edwards. Essentially, the Court held that if enough time has passed since the initial invocation of the right to counsel -- more than 14 days -- there is no presumptively problematic re-initiation as there was in Edwards.


Levins v. State (CR-15-0612)


Bell v. State (CR-15-0618)

The appellants in these two cases were two expungement petitioners who were denied relief at the circuit court level and asked the CCA to reverse the denials of their petitions. APPEALS DISMISSED One may only challenge the denial of their expungement petition by petitioning the Alabama Supreme Court for certiorari review of the denial of the petition for expungement.

John Earle Redfearn, IV v. State (CR-14-0500)


This case involved the denial of a motion to suppress drugs evidence recovered from Redfearn’s body. In February 2012, law enforcement obtained a search warrant of Redfearn’s residence based upon 2 controlled buys that occurred at the residence with Redfearn. Law enforcement executed the SW after they observed Redfearn drive away from the house. He was stopped several miles away while the search of the house was going on and taken back to the house by the detaining officers. While executing the warrant, Redfearn’s girlfriend arrived at the house and eventually told the officers that Redfearn keeps drugs on his person. An officer strip-searched Redfearn at the residence and recovered a bottle containing oxycodone pills in his underwear. Redfearn moved to suppress under Bailey v. US, 133 S.Ct. 1031 (2013). AFFIRMED. The CCA explained that while Bailey held that a suspect may be lawfully detained while police are conducting a search warrant only when the person is in the "immediate vicinity" of the place to be searched, Redfearn was properly detained because the police had probable cause to arrest him based upon the controlled buys previously carried out with Redfearn and observed by law enforcement.


Nathaniel Woods (CR-10-0695)

Alfonso Morris (CR-11-1925)

John Russell Calhoun (CR-14-0779)

In these three cases, the CCA affirmed the denial of Rule 32 relief for death-row inmates without holding evidentiary hearings. There’s not much that’s noteworthy in these opinions outside of the observation that the petitions were summarily denied because each petitioner failed to plead sufficient facts that, if proven true, could entitle them to relief. The vast majority of the factual claims in the three petitions were bare-boned factual allegations. In Woods and Morris, petitioners raised claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present certain expert testimony at trial. The CCA affirmed the summary dismissal of these claims because the petitioner failed to identify an expert and what that expert’s testimony would have been at the pleading stage. It bears repeating that if you’re going to raise an IAC claim, in order to be entitled to a hearing, you have to give the circuit court sufficient factual allegations that the court can conclude that your claims could entitle you to relief if proven true. In the context of IAC based on the failure to call certain expert witnesses, you need to make a proffer as to who that expert would have been and what the testimony would have been at the pleading stage.


Brian Fredick Lucas (CR-14-0744)


Lucas was convicted of first-degree attempted sodomy by forcible compulsion and first-degree sexual abuse stemming from an incident in which he allegedly touched his step-daughter on the mouth with his penis while she was sleeping. The CCA reversed his first-degree sodomy conviction on the grounds that the State’s showing did not present evidence of forcible compulsion -- there was no threat by Lucas or evidence that his actions overcame her earnest resistance. The CCA did enter a judgment convicting Lucas of attempted sexual misconduct.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


domestic abuse greene county alabama Glaze v State abandonment marion county mount olive alabama asia mcclain ake v oklahoma cherokee county alabama strickland v washington illegal gun carry robberies Mike Hubbard legende v state murder alabama supreme court Xavier Beasley keith v state embezzlement executions tuscaloosa alabama lethal injection drugs debtor prison bernard v north dakota nathan woods Kay Ivey brendan dassey morris alabama constitutional violations sentencing law and policy blog summaries criminal mischief blountsville alabama OJ Simpson mobile alabama OJ Simpson Made in America illegal gambling shelby county making a murderer tarrant alabama Joshua Reese montgomery alabama negligent homicide ex parte briseno Easter mcwilliams v dunn madison alabama sarah koenig cullman alabama attempted murder clarence thomas shoplifting rainbow city alabama criminal justice reform, lethal injection drug busts Etowah County Alabama, Fentanyl gun rights alabama baldwin county alabama Lucky D Arcade animal cruelty social media unlawful manufacturing mountain brook alabama department of justice betton v state warrantless blood draws implied consent mccalla alabama nicholas hawkins shooting Tracie Todd narcotics investigation kimberly alabama towles v state Hillary Clinton, court systems, homicide rate road rage fort payne alabama bessemer alabama john earle redfearn IV v state state of arizona criminal justice npr Malone v State gadsden alabama kidnapping adger alabama florence alabama death penalty, jerry bohannon baltimore city circuit court capital murder William Pryor shooting death midazolam utah v strieff kenneth eugene billups endangerment of a child russell calhoun Stephen Breyer capital punishment avondale alabama drug crimes Adamsville alabama abuse brady v maryland talladega superspeedway st clair county alabama bailey v us drug smuggling church robberies habeas corpus relief eugene lee jones v state identity theft court of criminal appeal releases constitutional law, utah supreme court alabama law enforcement agency self defense 2016 election, hoover alabama hoax destructive devices drug seizure car accident felony assaults death penalty hall v florida Eutaw Alabama levins v state home repair fraud fraudulent checks Rule 32 trussville alabama Thomas Hardiman brookside alabama huntsville alabama brian fredick lucas Sardis Alabama New York Times homicide Neil Gorsuch underage drinking netflix abduction sexual assault south carolina hurst v florida bomb threat mulga alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 second amendment capital offenses anniston alabama, stanley brent chapman Benn v State morgan county alabama Jefferson County Alabama assault forced isolation theft of property Marengo County Alabama alabama criminal law roundup eleventh circuit ruling boaz alabama warrior alabama adnan syed, fraud SCOTUS, alfonso morris Shonda Walker, dekalb county alabama judicial override terell corey mcmullin Dylann Roof Guy Terrell Junior economic growth Justice Sotomayor West Alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth apprendi v new jersey maryland court of special appeals heritage christian university pell city alabama sheffield v state Walker County Alabama hanceville alabama decatur alabama lauderdale county alabama beylund v north dakota eric sterling public assistance fraud brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix gun control crime of passion ring v arizona LWOP ferguson missouri smith v state § 13A-3-23 prostitution sting US Supreme Court Update pruitt v state peyton pruitt theft texas stoves v state birmingham alabama albertville alabama court of criminal appeals drug trafficking, Ingmire v State CCA update edwards v arizona aziz sayyed fake kidnapping, Briarwood Presbyterian Church arson limestone county alabama state of alabama Donald Trump, birchfield v north dakota christian guitierez calhoun county alabama Alabaster alabama lamar county moore v texas operation crackdown concealed carry springville alabama pelham alabama benjamin todd acton christmas shooting hurst mandamus fourth amendment battles v state fairfield alabama, scotus Alonzo Ephraim fultondale alabama pinson alabama debit card skimming scams oneonta alabama domestic violence dora alabama Woods v State department of justice, sixth amendment burglary moving violations § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing huntsville drug possession, mike gilotti banville v state steve avery breaking and entering Kareem Dacar Gaymon Pleasant Grove Alabama street racing serial drug activity Gardendale Alabama dothan alabama heflin alabama minor offenses Tommy Arthur parole armed robbery operation bullseye aiding and abetting Samuel Alito foley alabama the mannequin challenge eighth amendment, editorial campbell v state blount county alabama



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.