CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Alabama's Lethal Injection Survives Another Challenge

J.D. Lloyd - Tuesday, February 21, 2017



Today, the United States Supreme Court denied an Alabama death-row inmate’s request to review the constitutionality of Alabama’s three-drug execution protocol. Tommy Arthur argued that Alabama’s lethal injection cocktail violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on “cruel and unusual punishment” because the method risks severe and unnecessary pain and suffering. The Court’s refusal to review the protocol almost certainly means that Tommy Arthur, who has been on death row for more than 30 years, will likely be executed soon. It also likely means that defendants who hope to challenge Alabama’s method of execution face a massive uphill battle in future fights.


Since lethal injection became the preferred method of execution in the 1980s, almost all states have used a three-drug cocktail to carry out the execution. The first drug administered would be a large amount of a sedative that’s supposed to knock the inmate unconscious and suppress all sensation. The second drug would be a paralytic, which would stop all muscular-skeletal movements, including the diaphragm. The final drug would cause the heart to stop.


Until recently, the first drug used in the three-drug protocol was either sodium thiopental. The manufacturer discontinued production of that drug, so states turned to pentobarbital. That drug also became unavailable in 2013. The states then turned to midazolam, the drug at the heart of recent Eighth Amendment litigation.


According to experts, midazolam doesn’t have the anesthetic effect of thiopental or pentobarbital. This is important because the second and third drugs administered in the the lethal injection process are extremely painful. Reports describe the pain from these drugs as a searing, burning pain spreading from the injection site throughout the body. Again, they literally stop your breathing and your heart. So, without a strong sedative, an inmate is likely facing an excruciating (and often prolonged) execution.


Executions using midazolam have been awful. Defendants executed with the drug in Oklahoma, Arizona, and Alabama died slowly and, apparently, very painfully when midazolam has been the first drug administered. (Justice Sotomayor’s dissent below details these executions.)


In challenging a method of execution as unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment, a defendant must show a readily available constitutional alternative. Here, Arthur argued that there was a constitutional alternative to lethal injection in Alabama: the firing squad. The lower federal courts rejected this claim because Alabama law doesn’t specifically provide for death-by-firing-squad. Because Arthur couldn’t prove a constitutional alternative, the court wouldn’t review his claim that the cocktail using midazolam was unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment.


Justice Sotomayor wrote a scathing dissent from the the Court’s refusal to consider this case. The dissent pointed out that Alabama recently amended its laws to allow for the execution of a defendant by “any constitutional method of execution.” See 15-18-82.1(c). Justice Sotomayor argued that Arthur met his burden of showing a constitutional alternative, even if that alternative wasn’t on the books in Alabama.


The dissent here was largely a critique on the lethal-injection protocol itself and the Court’s refusal to consider how screwed up our Eighth Amendment jurisprudence has become when a defendant can show that a method of execution causes unnecessary (and unconstitutional) pain and suffering, but can still be executed with that method because a State doesn’t have another method of execution on the books.


Read Sotomayor’s dissent here.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Lethal Injection Drugs in South Carolina & Alabama

J.D. Lloyd - Wednesday, June 08, 2016

A blog I follow -- the Sentencing Law and Policy Blog -- had an interesting recent post of note... The article looks at how both South Carolina and federal prosecutors are seeking the death penalty for Dylann Roof's allegedly race-based, mass shooting at a Charleston church in 2015. This case poses a unique situation since this is the first modern case where both state and federal want execution after both rejected Roof’s plea to serve life in prison. However, with South Carolina running out of the drugs used for lethal injections in 2013 and manufacturers recently cutting off supplies of the drug to the states, prosecutors could be waiting a long time for Roof’s punishment to be fulfilled even if he is condemned to death by the jury.


Alabama faced a similar issue when the production of the first drug used in the three-drug cocktail of the state’s lethal injection, sodium thiopental, was halted by the manufacturer. Several other drug companies such as Pfizer and Akorn have stopped selling drugs used in executions to state prisons. These decisions have significantly slowed down executions in states using the death penalty and has led to a myriad of new legal challenges under the Eight Amendment's ban on "cruel and unusual punishment." The state is currently working to use compounding pharmacies that will make customized batches of drugs, but they have had difficulties with their recent recruitment attempts.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


capital murder calhoun county alabama texas Thomas Hardiman brian fredick lucas state of arizona madison alabama alabama implied consent Gardendale Alabama domestic violence Walker County Alabama fort payne alabama lauderdale county alabama attempted murder department of justice, negligent homicide operation crackdown shooting death lamar county Samuel Alito sentencing law and policy blog summaries LWOP fourth amendment Hillary Clinton, brendan dassey ring v arizona foley alabama stoves v state aiding and abetting 28 U.S.C. § 2254 New York Times cullman alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing crime of passion ex parte briseno theft of property armed robbery criminal justice reform, kidnapping baldwin county alabama parole pruitt v state huntsville alabama steve avery making a murderer greene county alabama stanley brent chapman gun rights aziz sayyed terell corey mcmullin morgan county alabama Ingmire v State hoover alabama executions unlawful manufacturing Briarwood Presbyterian Church eric sterling Easter US Supreme Court Update trussville alabama tuscaloosa alabama Dylann Roof William Pryor department of justice church robberies Etowah County Alabama, court of criminal appeals alabama law enforcement agency npr mount olive alabama economic growth nathan woods hurst mandamus gun control abduction Woods v State mountain brook alabama montgomery alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix robberies boaz alabama fultondale alabama mike gilotti animal cruelty minor offenses sarah koenig Sardis Alabama public assistance fraud shoplifting forced isolation bomb threat state of alabama fraud springville alabama narcotics investigation apprendi v new jersey § 13A-3-23 scotus warrior alabama keith v state debit card skimming scams lethal injection drugs heritage christian university edwards v arizona death penalty brady v maryland birchfield v north dakota kenneth eugene billups drug busts midazolam christmas shooting illegal gun carry fairfield alabama, alabama supreme court smith v state home repair fraud bessemer alabama Adamsville alabama towles v state moore v texas Tommy Arthur Shonda Walker, Tracie Todd hall v florida utah supreme court peyton pruitt pinson alabama pelham alabama habeas corpus relief felony assaults battles v state florence alabama morris alabama anniston alabama, Justice Sotomayor self defense legende v state Xavier Beasley social media constitutional law, Benn v State sexual assault sixth amendment blountsville alabama capital offenses decatur alabama kimberly alabama road rage breaking and entering illegal gambling russell calhoun Mike Hubbard Stephen Breyer assault shooting benjamin todd acton editorial sheffield v state Malone v State maryland court of special appeals talladega superspeedway court systems, Guy Terrell Junior mccalla alabama Lucky D Arcade homicide gadsden alabama Rule 32 identity theft constitutional violations 2016 election, Glaze v State Jefferson County Alabama underage drinking shelby county OJ Simpson jerry bohannon operation bullseye hoax destructive devices street racing drug seizure christian guitierez pell city alabama serial eugene lee jones v state utah v strieff strickland v washington clarence thomas bailey v us court of criminal appeal releases banville v state adnan syed, eleventh circuit ruling murder bernard v north dakota netflix adger alabama fraudulent checks debtor prison OJ Simpson Made in America criminal mischief Alabaster alabama fake kidnapping, Eutaw Alabama lethal injection mcwilliams v dunn drug possession, nicholas hawkins capital punishment domestic abuse Kay Ivey heflin alabama death penalty, alabama criminal law roundup beylund v north dakota abandonment baltimore city circuit court drug activity Kareem Dacar Gaymon drug trafficking, mobile alabama dora alabama st clair county alabama judicial override abuse concealed carry Pleasant Grove Alabama blount county alabama huntsville south carolina criminal justice asia mcclain Marengo County Alabama second amendment avondale alabama limestone county alabama marion county Joshua Reese homicide rate moving violations john earle redfearn IV v state theft the mannequin challenge arson CCA update brookside alabama West Alabama Alonzo Ephraim ake v oklahoma SCOTUS, alfonso morris dothan alabama rainbow city alabama campbell v state betton v state Donald Trump, tarrant alabama albertville alabama hurst v florida Neil Gorsuch burglary warrantless blood draws drug smuggling car accident prostitution sting ferguson missouri levins v state embezzlement Wesley Adam Whitworth dekalb county alabama hanceville alabama oneonta alabama cherokee county alabama Fentanyl drug crimes mulga alabama birmingham alabama eighth amendment, endangerment of a child



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.