CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Alabama's Lethal Injection Survives Another Challenge

J.D. Lloyd - Tuesday, February 21, 2017



Today, the United States Supreme Court denied an Alabama death-row inmate’s request to review the constitutionality of Alabama’s three-drug execution protocol. Tommy Arthur argued that Alabama’s lethal injection cocktail violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on “cruel and unusual punishment” because the method risks severe and unnecessary pain and suffering. The Court’s refusal to review the protocol almost certainly means that Tommy Arthur, who has been on death row for more than 30 years, will likely be executed soon. It also likely means that defendants who hope to challenge Alabama’s method of execution face a massive uphill battle in future fights.


Since lethal injection became the preferred method of execution in the 1980s, almost all states have used a three-drug cocktail to carry out the execution. The first drug administered would be a large amount of a sedative that’s supposed to knock the inmate unconscious and suppress all sensation. The second drug would be a paralytic, which would stop all muscular-skeletal movements, including the diaphragm. The final drug would cause the heart to stop.


Until recently, the first drug used in the three-drug protocol was either sodium thiopental. The manufacturer discontinued production of that drug, so states turned to pentobarbital. That drug also became unavailable in 2013. The states then turned to midazolam, the drug at the heart of recent Eighth Amendment litigation.


According to experts, midazolam doesn’t have the anesthetic effect of thiopental or pentobarbital. This is important because the second and third drugs administered in the the lethal injection process are extremely painful. Reports describe the pain from these drugs as a searing, burning pain spreading from the injection site throughout the body. Again, they literally stop your breathing and your heart. So, without a strong sedative, an inmate is likely facing an excruciating (and often prolonged) execution.


Executions using midazolam have been awful. Defendants executed with the drug in Oklahoma, Arizona, and Alabama died slowly and, apparently, very painfully when midazolam has been the first drug administered. (Justice Sotomayor’s dissent below details these executions.)


In challenging a method of execution as unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment, a defendant must show a readily available constitutional alternative. Here, Arthur argued that there was a constitutional alternative to lethal injection in Alabama: the firing squad. The lower federal courts rejected this claim because Alabama law doesn’t specifically provide for death-by-firing-squad. Because Arthur couldn’t prove a constitutional alternative, the court wouldn’t review his claim that the cocktail using midazolam was unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment.


Justice Sotomayor wrote a scathing dissent from the the Court’s refusal to consider this case. The dissent pointed out that Alabama recently amended its laws to allow for the execution of a defendant by “any constitutional method of execution.” See 15-18-82.1(c). Justice Sotomayor argued that Arthur met his burden of showing a constitutional alternative, even if that alternative wasn’t on the books in Alabama.


The dissent here was largely a critique on the lethal-injection protocol itself and the Court’s refusal to consider how screwed up our Eighth Amendment jurisprudence has become when a defendant can show that a method of execution causes unnecessary (and unconstitutional) pain and suffering, but can still be executed with that method because a State doesn’t have another method of execution on the books.


Read Sotomayor’s dissent here.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Lethal Injection Drugs in South Carolina & Alabama

J.D. Lloyd - Wednesday, June 08, 2016

A blog I follow -- the Sentencing Law and Policy Blog -- had an interesting recent post of note... The article looks at how both South Carolina and federal prosecutors are seeking the death penalty for Dylann Roof's allegedly race-based, mass shooting at a Charleston church in 2015. This case poses a unique situation since this is the first modern case where both state and federal want execution after both rejected Roof’s plea to serve life in prison. However, with South Carolina running out of the drugs used for lethal injections in 2013 and manufacturers recently cutting off supplies of the drug to the states, prosecutors could be waiting a long time for Roof’s punishment to be fulfilled even if he is condemned to death by the jury.


Alabama faced a similar issue when the production of the first drug used in the three-drug cocktail of the state’s lethal injection, sodium thiopental, was halted by the manufacturer. Several other drug companies such as Pfizer and Akorn have stopped selling drugs used in executions to state prisons. These decisions have significantly slowed down executions in states using the death penalty and has led to a myriad of new legal challenges under the Eight Amendment's ban on "cruel and unusual punishment." The state is currently working to use compounding pharmacies that will make customized batches of drugs, but they have had difficulties with their recent recruitment attempts.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


road rage midazolam hall v florida hanceville alabama illegal gambling implied consent birchfield v north dakota dothan alabama betton v state embezzlement Jefferson County Alabama huntsville criminal justice reform, adger alabama st clair county alabama abuse forced isolation towles v state capital offenses armed robbery avondale alabama morris alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 clarence thomas department of justice mobile alabama fourth amendment south carolina alabama criminal law roundup jerry bohannon concealed carry Guy Terrell Junior debit card skimming scams West Alabama executions constitutional violations ake v oklahoma russell calhoun mcwilliams v dunn brendan dassey morgan county alabama bessemer alabama ring v arizona state of alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth limestone county alabama Dylann Roof robberies OJ Simpson Mike Hubbard ex parte briseno nathan woods fraudulent checks department of justice, dekalb county alabama baldwin county alabama sixth amendment attempted murder legende v state madison alabama Tracie Todd SCOTUS, brady v maryland christmas shooting self defense editorial burglary albertville alabama boaz alabama public assistance fraud felony assaults church robberies eugene lee jones v state terell corey mcmullin rainbow city alabama talladega superspeedway strickland v washington huntsville alabama benjamin todd acton moore v texas Glaze v State Woods v State Adamsville alabama eighth amendment, 2016 election, Joshua Reese springville alabama john earle redfearn IV v state birmingham alabama montgomery alabama home repair fraud Briarwood Presbyterian Church lethal injection heritage christian university Thomas Hardiman gun rights court of criminal appeals warrantless blood draws aziz sayyed murder Lucky D Arcade court of criminal appeal releases nicholas hawkins trussville alabama social media sarah koenig scotus identity theft kimberly alabama steve avery homicide fultondale alabama minor offenses fairfield alabama, bailey v us lauderdale county alabama making a murderer baltimore city circuit court oneonta alabama shoplifting New York Times endangerment of a child drug smuggling Ingmire v State tuscaloosa alabama anniston alabama, edwards v arizona street racing Alabaster alabama parole Tommy Arthur stoves v state campbell v state Kareem Dacar Gaymon marion county kenneth eugene billups fraud criminal mischief judicial override abduction pinson alabama hurst v florida underage drinking brian fredick lucas drug trafficking, peyton pruitt warrior alabama Donald Trump, mount olive alabama Gardendale Alabama battles v state bomb threat netflix Sardis Alabama heflin alabama fake kidnapping, William Pryor smith v state brookside alabama apprendi v new jersey Alonzo Ephraim Kay Ivey domestic abuse beylund v north dakota arson hurst mandamus hoover alabama Walker County Alabama greene county alabama drug crimes ferguson missouri christian guitierez economic growth § 13A-3-23 pruitt v state lethal injection drugs unlawful manufacturing theft utah v strieff pelham alabama domestic violence Samuel Alito cullman alabama sheffield v state blount county alabama Hillary Clinton, foley alabama negligent homicide Rule 32 second amendment drug busts levins v state Neil Gorsuch Malone v State mountain brook alabama Fentanyl the mannequin challenge Eutaw Alabama criminal justice abandonment tarrant alabama gadsden alabama gun control alabama supreme court lamar county florence alabama pell city alabama Justice Sotomayor Etowah County Alabama, keith v state Easter moving violations brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix eric sterling car accident calhoun county alabama constitutional law, operation crackdown court systems, capital punishment sentencing law and policy blog summaries shooting death hoax destructive devices homicide rate operation bullseye animal cruelty capital murder dora alabama mccalla alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing stanley brent chapman eleventh circuit ruling banville v state npr Pleasant Grove Alabama Xavier Beasley death penalty, assault illegal gun carry blountsville alabama asia mcclain crime of passion Shonda Walker, bernard v north dakota mike gilotti death penalty Marengo County Alabama serial alabama law enforcement agency aiding and abetting decatur alabama drug possession, prostitution sting shooting Stephen Breyer maryland court of special appeals US Supreme Court Update alabama drug activity drug seizure CCA update alfonso morris debtor prison adnan syed, cherokee county alabama utah supreme court narcotics investigation OJ Simpson Made in America Benn v State texas state of arizona breaking and entering kidnapping sexual assault fort payne alabama shelby county theft of property habeas corpus relief mulga alabama LWOP



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.