CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Alabama's Lethal Injection Survives Another Challenge

J.D. Lloyd - Tuesday, February 21, 2017



Today, the United States Supreme Court denied an Alabama death-row inmate’s request to review the constitutionality of Alabama’s three-drug execution protocol. Tommy Arthur argued that Alabama’s lethal injection cocktail violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on “cruel and unusual punishment” because the method risks severe and unnecessary pain and suffering. The Court’s refusal to review the protocol almost certainly means that Tommy Arthur, who has been on death row for more than 30 years, will likely be executed soon. It also likely means that defendants who hope to challenge Alabama’s method of execution face a massive uphill battle in future fights.


Since lethal injection became the preferred method of execution in the 1980s, almost all states have used a three-drug cocktail to carry out the execution. The first drug administered would be a large amount of a sedative that’s supposed to knock the inmate unconscious and suppress all sensation. The second drug would be a paralytic, which would stop all muscular-skeletal movements, including the diaphragm. The final drug would cause the heart to stop.


Until recently, the first drug used in the three-drug protocol was either sodium thiopental. The manufacturer discontinued production of that drug, so states turned to pentobarbital. That drug also became unavailable in 2013. The states then turned to midazolam, the drug at the heart of recent Eighth Amendment litigation.


According to experts, midazolam doesn’t have the anesthetic effect of thiopental or pentobarbital. This is important because the second and third drugs administered in the the lethal injection process are extremely painful. Reports describe the pain from these drugs as a searing, burning pain spreading from the injection site throughout the body. Again, they literally stop your breathing and your heart. So, without a strong sedative, an inmate is likely facing an excruciating (and often prolonged) execution.


Executions using midazolam have been awful. Defendants executed with the drug in Oklahoma, Arizona, and Alabama died slowly and, apparently, very painfully when midazolam has been the first drug administered. (Justice Sotomayor’s dissent below details these executions.)


In challenging a method of execution as unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment, a defendant must show a readily available constitutional alternative. Here, Arthur argued that there was a constitutional alternative to lethal injection in Alabama: the firing squad. The lower federal courts rejected this claim because Alabama law doesn’t specifically provide for death-by-firing-squad. Because Arthur couldn’t prove a constitutional alternative, the court wouldn’t review his claim that the cocktail using midazolam was unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment.


Justice Sotomayor wrote a scathing dissent from the the Court’s refusal to consider this case. The dissent pointed out that Alabama recently amended its laws to allow for the execution of a defendant by “any constitutional method of execution.” See 15-18-82.1(c). Justice Sotomayor argued that Arthur met his burden of showing a constitutional alternative, even if that alternative wasn’t on the books in Alabama.


The dissent here was largely a critique on the lethal-injection protocol itself and the Court’s refusal to consider how screwed up our Eighth Amendment jurisprudence has become when a defendant can show that a method of execution causes unnecessary (and unconstitutional) pain and suffering, but can still be executed with that method because a State doesn’t have another method of execution on the books.


Read Sotomayor’s dissent here.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Lethal Injection Drugs in South Carolina & Alabama

J.D. Lloyd - Wednesday, June 08, 2016

A blog I follow -- the Sentencing Law and Policy Blog -- had an interesting recent post of note... The article looks at how both South Carolina and federal prosecutors are seeking the death penalty for Dylann Roof's allegedly race-based, mass shooting at a Charleston church in 2015. This case poses a unique situation since this is the first modern case where both state and federal want execution after both rejected Roof’s plea to serve life in prison. However, with South Carolina running out of the drugs used for lethal injections in 2013 and manufacturers recently cutting off supplies of the drug to the states, prosecutors could be waiting a long time for Roof’s punishment to be fulfilled even if he is condemned to death by the jury.


Alabama faced a similar issue when the production of the first drug used in the three-drug cocktail of the state’s lethal injection, sodium thiopental, was halted by the manufacturer. Several other drug companies such as Pfizer and Akorn have stopped selling drugs used in executions to state prisons. These decisions have significantly slowed down executions in states using the death penalty and has led to a myriad of new legal challenges under the Eight Amendment's ban on "cruel and unusual punishment." The state is currently working to use compounding pharmacies that will make customized batches of drugs, but they have had difficulties with their recent recruitment attempts.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


capital punishment alabama Neil Gorsuch § 13A-3-23 drug trafficking, foley alabama Guy Terrell Junior pinson alabama huntsville alabama lethal injection drugs felony assaults limestone county alabama negligent homicide morgan county alabama economic growth alabama criminal law roundup narcotics investigation making a murderer court systems, Kay Ivey smith v state Malone v State sentencing law and policy blog summaries alfonso morris lauderdale county alabama home repair fraud criminal mischief birchfield v north dakota capital offenses second amendment nicholas hawkins huntsville habeas corpus relief fultondale alabama stanley brent chapman eric sterling § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing edwards v arizona drug smuggling drug crimes aziz sayyed levins v state CCA update death penalty, springville alabama Donald Trump, utah v strieff nathan woods pell city alabama mccalla alabama legende v state madison alabama blount county alabama pruitt v state steve avery baldwin county alabama fake kidnapping, Gardendale Alabama montgomery alabama anniston alabama, illegal gambling SCOTUS, gadsden alabama brady v maryland Alabaster alabama bailey v us netflix bomb threat hall v florida lethal injection criminal justice breaking and entering court of criminal appeals abuse brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix Mike Hubbard ferguson missouri Joshua Reese brian fredick lucas arson debit card skimming scams abandonment shooting church robberies Adamsville alabama calhoun county alabama albertville alabama gun rights criminal justice reform, self defense Briarwood Presbyterian Church Wesley Adam Whitworth ring v arizona ake v oklahoma boaz alabama pelham alabama operation bullseye Samuel Alito keith v state baltimore city circuit court robberies assault mike gilotti Shonda Walker, bernard v north dakota moore v texas state of alabama adger alabama road rage Tommy Arthur mulga alabama warrantless blood draws ex parte briseno burglary dekalb county alabama morris alabama Tracie Todd executions strickland v washington drug busts cullman alabama asia mcclain public assistance fraud maryland court of special appeals adnan syed, sixth amendment kimberly alabama operation crackdown underage drinking street racing Dylann Roof jerry bohannon abduction texas William Pryor lamar county brendan dassey tuscaloosa alabama warrior alabama court of criminal appeal releases eugene lee jones v state Sardis Alabama aiding and abetting Rule 32 brookside alabama Easter Hillary Clinton, towles v state death penalty drug seizure russell calhoun mobile alabama mcwilliams v dunn hurst v florida heritage christian university peyton pruitt drug possession, Justice Sotomayor Kareem Dacar Gaymon tarrant alabama greene county alabama minor offenses Fentanyl theft of property theft armed robbery New York Times Ingmire v State stoves v state apprendi v new jersey trussville alabama fourth amendment unlawful manufacturing eleventh circuit ruling kenneth eugene billups fairfield alabama, benjamin todd acton constitutional violations john earle redfearn IV v state dothan alabama Lucky D Arcade clarence thomas Alonzo Ephraim serial talladega superspeedway hoax destructive devices homicide rate 2016 election, judicial override department of justice, Xavier Beasley Jefferson County Alabama utah supreme court LWOP terell corey mcmullin oneonta alabama shooting death beylund v north dakota domestic violence fraud cherokee county alabama crime of passion avondale alabama blountsville alabama Etowah County Alabama, murder midazolam gun control hurst mandamus south carolina banville v state eighth amendment, mount olive alabama dora alabama alabama supreme court battles v state embezzlement parole rainbow city alabama US Supreme Court Update florence alabama drug activity betton v state Woods v State concealed carry constitutional law, OJ Simpson Made in America birmingham alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 christian guitierez capital murder fort payne alabama OJ Simpson sheffield v state social media mountain brook alabama implied consent hanceville alabama illegal gun carry homicide kidnapping West Alabama Benn v State npr Glaze v State identity theft department of justice state of arizona Thomas Hardiman editorial endangerment of a child marion county bessemer alabama attempted murder shelby county fraudulent checks christmas shooting sarah koenig hoover alabama alabama law enforcement agency Stephen Breyer sexual assault campbell v state scotus car accident Eutaw Alabama the mannequin challenge moving violations st clair county alabama debtor prison prostitution sting Walker County Alabama animal cruelty domestic abuse Pleasant Grove Alabama heflin alabama decatur alabama forced isolation shoplifting Marengo County Alabama



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.