CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Alabama's Lethal Injection Survives Another Challenge

J.D. Lloyd - Tuesday, February 21, 2017



Today, the United States Supreme Court denied an Alabama death-row inmate’s request to review the constitutionality of Alabama’s three-drug execution protocol. Tommy Arthur argued that Alabama’s lethal injection cocktail violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on “cruel and unusual punishment” because the method risks severe and unnecessary pain and suffering. The Court’s refusal to review the protocol almost certainly means that Tommy Arthur, who has been on death row for more than 30 years, will likely be executed soon. It also likely means that defendants who hope to challenge Alabama’s method of execution face a massive uphill battle in future fights.


Since lethal injection became the preferred method of execution in the 1980s, almost all states have used a three-drug cocktail to carry out the execution. The first drug administered would be a large amount of a sedative that’s supposed to knock the inmate unconscious and suppress all sensation. The second drug would be a paralytic, which would stop all muscular-skeletal movements, including the diaphragm. The final drug would cause the heart to stop.


Until recently, the first drug used in the three-drug protocol was either sodium thiopental. The manufacturer discontinued production of that drug, so states turned to pentobarbital. That drug also became unavailable in 2013. The states then turned to midazolam, the drug at the heart of recent Eighth Amendment litigation.


According to experts, midazolam doesn’t have the anesthetic effect of thiopental or pentobarbital. This is important because the second and third drugs administered in the the lethal injection process are extremely painful. Reports describe the pain from these drugs as a searing, burning pain spreading from the injection site throughout the body. Again, they literally stop your breathing and your heart. So, without a strong sedative, an inmate is likely facing an excruciating (and often prolonged) execution.


Executions using midazolam have been awful. Defendants executed with the drug in Oklahoma, Arizona, and Alabama died slowly and, apparently, very painfully when midazolam has been the first drug administered. (Justice Sotomayor’s dissent below details these executions.)


In challenging a method of execution as unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment, a defendant must show a readily available constitutional alternative. Here, Arthur argued that there was a constitutional alternative to lethal injection in Alabama: the firing squad. The lower federal courts rejected this claim because Alabama law doesn’t specifically provide for death-by-firing-squad. Because Arthur couldn’t prove a constitutional alternative, the court wouldn’t review his claim that the cocktail using midazolam was unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment.


Justice Sotomayor wrote a scathing dissent from the the Court’s refusal to consider this case. The dissent pointed out that Alabama recently amended its laws to allow for the execution of a defendant by “any constitutional method of execution.” See 15-18-82.1(c). Justice Sotomayor argued that Arthur met his burden of showing a constitutional alternative, even if that alternative wasn’t on the books in Alabama.


The dissent here was largely a critique on the lethal-injection protocol itself and the Court’s refusal to consider how screwed up our Eighth Amendment jurisprudence has become when a defendant can show that a method of execution causes unnecessary (and unconstitutional) pain and suffering, but can still be executed with that method because a State doesn’t have another method of execution on the books.


Read Sotomayor’s dissent here.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Lethal Injection Drugs in South Carolina & Alabama

J.D. Lloyd - Wednesday, June 08, 2016

A blog I follow -- the Sentencing Law and Policy Blog -- had an interesting recent post of note... The article looks at how both South Carolina and federal prosecutors are seeking the death penalty for Dylann Roof's allegedly race-based, mass shooting at a Charleston church in 2015. This case poses a unique situation since this is the first modern case where both state and federal want execution after both rejected Roof’s plea to serve life in prison. However, with South Carolina running out of the drugs used for lethal injections in 2013 and manufacturers recently cutting off supplies of the drug to the states, prosecutors could be waiting a long time for Roof’s punishment to be fulfilled even if he is condemned to death by the jury.


Alabama faced a similar issue when the production of the first drug used in the three-drug cocktail of the state’s lethal injection, sodium thiopental, was halted by the manufacturer. Several other drug companies such as Pfizer and Akorn have stopped selling drugs used in executions to state prisons. These decisions have significantly slowed down executions in states using the death penalty and has led to a myriad of new legal challenges under the Eight Amendment's ban on "cruel and unusual punishment." The state is currently working to use compounding pharmacies that will make customized batches of drugs, but they have had difficulties with their recent recruitment attempts.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


christian guitierez anniston alabama, brady v maryland pruitt v state drug smuggling minor offenses benjamin todd acton drug possession, asia mcclain terell corey mcmullin operation bullseye underage drinking eugene lee jones v state decatur alabama death penalty death penalty, attempted murder road rage alabama nathan woods bessemer alabama moore v texas texas fort payne alabama Etowah County Alabama, kidnapping trussville alabama OJ Simpson Made in America mountain brook alabama limestone county alabama court of criminal appeals drug seizure bomb threat springville alabama drug activity steve avery warrior alabama stanley brent chapman Sardis Alabama Rule 32 jerry bohannon clarence thomas Malone v State concealed carry illegal gun carry animal cruelty felony assaults aziz sayyed Marengo County Alabama heritage christian university edwards v arizona morgan county alabama home repair fraud serial court of criminal appeal releases baldwin county alabama nicholas hawkins pelham alabama mike gilotti car accident fake kidnapping, Joshua Reese Eutaw Alabama rainbow city alabama warrantless blood draws abuse foley alabama adnan syed, npr department of justice, madison alabama Neil Gorsuch christmas shooting brookside alabama unlawful manufacturing capital offenses Wesley Adam Whitworth ake v oklahoma fraudulent checks theft of property sixth amendment Jefferson County Alabama crime of passion aiding and abetting dekalb county alabama drug trafficking, Xavier Beasley 2016 election, heflin alabama SCOTUS, hurst mandamus bailey v us Lucky D Arcade domestic violence Kay Ivey court systems, breaking and entering mobile alabama church robberies ex parte briseno eleventh circuit ruling pinson alabama albertville alabama sheffield v state russell calhoun alabama criminal law roundup pell city alabama smith v state criminal justice tarrant alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church alabama supreme court baltimore city circuit court mount olive alabama operation crackdown capital punishment Tommy Arthur levins v state Samuel Alito Thomas Hardiman sarah koenig sentencing law and policy blog summaries utah supreme court fraud theft Pleasant Grove Alabama Benn v State illegal gambling lethal injection drugs st clair county alabama utah v strieff cullman alabama blount county alabama stoves v state beylund v north dakota homicide birmingham alabama executions endangerment of a child sexual assault lauderdale county alabama peyton pruitt gun control ferguson missouri 28 U.S.C. § 2254 criminal justice reform, eric sterling campbell v state morris alabama legende v state drug crimes capital murder Tracie Todd Mike Hubbard making a murderer birchfield v north dakota Ingmire v State Donald Trump, prostitution sting marion county tuscaloosa alabama US Supreme Court Update habeas corpus relief towles v state hoover alabama Glaze v State moving violations Alabaster alabama dora alabama constitutional law, street racing Kareem Dacar Gaymon drug busts Walker County Alabama alfonso morris second amendment bernard v north dakota gadsden alabama calhoun county alabama department of justice brian fredick lucas fultondale alabama state of alabama forced isolation hurst v florida ring v arizona banville v state LWOP self defense state of arizona huntsville armed robbery § 13A-3-23 mcwilliams v dunn Justice Sotomayor social media south carolina battles v state Woods v State strickland v washington scotus arson implied consent OJ Simpson Dylann Roof Guy Terrell Junior William Pryor avondale alabama brendan dassey kenneth eugene billups talladega superspeedway adger alabama shoplifting editorial midazolam alabama law enforcement agency judicial override Adamsville alabama cherokee county alabama parole debit card skimming scams gun rights john earle redfearn IV v state lethal injection brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix fourth amendment abduction netflix hoax destructive devices criminal mischief assault negligent homicide identity theft lamar county shooting CCA update boaz alabama murder embezzlement burglary hanceville alabama Hillary Clinton, robberies abandonment Alonzo Ephraim hall v florida mccalla alabama shooting death New York Times public assistance fraud oneonta alabama Easter mulga alabama West Alabama florence alabama keith v state maryland court of special appeals eighth amendment, domestic abuse homicide rate Stephen Breyer apprendi v new jersey Shonda Walker, constitutional violations debtor prison Gardendale Alabama montgomery alabama narcotics investigation kimberly alabama dothan alabama greene county alabama betton v state Fentanyl economic growth § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing shelby county fairfield alabama, the mannequin challenge huntsville alabama blountsville alabama



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.