CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Alabama's Lethal Injection Survives Another Challenge

J.D. Lloyd - Tuesday, February 21, 2017



Today, the United States Supreme Court denied an Alabama death-row inmate’s request to review the constitutionality of Alabama’s three-drug execution protocol. Tommy Arthur argued that Alabama’s lethal injection cocktail violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on “cruel and unusual punishment” because the method risks severe and unnecessary pain and suffering. The Court’s refusal to review the protocol almost certainly means that Tommy Arthur, who has been on death row for more than 30 years, will likely be executed soon. It also likely means that defendants who hope to challenge Alabama’s method of execution face a massive uphill battle in future fights.


Since lethal injection became the preferred method of execution in the 1980s, almost all states have used a three-drug cocktail to carry out the execution. The first drug administered would be a large amount of a sedative that’s supposed to knock the inmate unconscious and suppress all sensation. The second drug would be a paralytic, which would stop all muscular-skeletal movements, including the diaphragm. The final drug would cause the heart to stop.


Until recently, the first drug used in the three-drug protocol was either sodium thiopental. The manufacturer discontinued production of that drug, so states turned to pentobarbital. That drug also became unavailable in 2013. The states then turned to midazolam, the drug at the heart of recent Eighth Amendment litigation.


According to experts, midazolam doesn’t have the anesthetic effect of thiopental or pentobarbital. This is important because the second and third drugs administered in the the lethal injection process are extremely painful. Reports describe the pain from these drugs as a searing, burning pain spreading from the injection site throughout the body. Again, they literally stop your breathing and your heart. So, without a strong sedative, an inmate is likely facing an excruciating (and often prolonged) execution.


Executions using midazolam have been awful. Defendants executed with the drug in Oklahoma, Arizona, and Alabama died slowly and, apparently, very painfully when midazolam has been the first drug administered. (Justice Sotomayor’s dissent below details these executions.)


In challenging a method of execution as unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment, a defendant must show a readily available constitutional alternative. Here, Arthur argued that there was a constitutional alternative to lethal injection in Alabama: the firing squad. The lower federal courts rejected this claim because Alabama law doesn’t specifically provide for death-by-firing-squad. Because Arthur couldn’t prove a constitutional alternative, the court wouldn’t review his claim that the cocktail using midazolam was unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment.


Justice Sotomayor wrote a scathing dissent from the the Court’s refusal to consider this case. The dissent pointed out that Alabama recently amended its laws to allow for the execution of a defendant by “any constitutional method of execution.” See 15-18-82.1(c). Justice Sotomayor argued that Arthur met his burden of showing a constitutional alternative, even if that alternative wasn’t on the books in Alabama.


The dissent here was largely a critique on the lethal-injection protocol itself and the Court’s refusal to consider how screwed up our Eighth Amendment jurisprudence has become when a defendant can show that a method of execution causes unnecessary (and unconstitutional) pain and suffering, but can still be executed with that method because a State doesn’t have another method of execution on the books.


Read Sotomayor’s dissent here.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Lethal Injection Drugs in South Carolina & Alabama

J.D. Lloyd - Wednesday, June 08, 2016

A blog I follow -- the Sentencing Law and Policy Blog -- had an interesting recent post of note... The article looks at how both South Carolina and federal prosecutors are seeking the death penalty for Dylann Roof's allegedly race-based, mass shooting at a Charleston church in 2015. This case poses a unique situation since this is the first modern case where both state and federal want execution after both rejected Roof’s plea to serve life in prison. However, with South Carolina running out of the drugs used for lethal injections in 2013 and manufacturers recently cutting off supplies of the drug to the states, prosecutors could be waiting a long time for Roof’s punishment to be fulfilled even if he is condemned to death by the jury.


Alabama faced a similar issue when the production of the first drug used in the three-drug cocktail of the state’s lethal injection, sodium thiopental, was halted by the manufacturer. Several other drug companies such as Pfizer and Akorn have stopped selling drugs used in executions to state prisons. These decisions have significantly slowed down executions in states using the death penalty and has led to a myriad of new legal challenges under the Eight Amendment's ban on "cruel and unusual punishment." The state is currently working to use compounding pharmacies that will make customized batches of drugs, but they have had difficulties with their recent recruitment attempts.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


shelby county fourth amendment john earle redfearn IV v state Ingmire v State mobile alabama kimberly alabama decatur alabama dora alabama domestic abuse unlawful manufacturing Sardis Alabama talladega superspeedway capital murder criminal justice reform, forced isolation Benn v State Mike Hubbard theft of property minor offenses blountsville alabama Rule 32 kidnapping lethal injection drugs Etowah County Alabama, drug seizure gun rights benjamin todd acton greene county alabama executions Neil Gorsuch department of justice, abandonment hanceville alabama underage drinking birmingham alabama maryland court of special appeals birchfield v north dakota road rage oneonta alabama brian fredick lucas fraud court of criminal appeal releases baldwin county alabama fraudulent checks south carolina capital offenses Easter eighth amendment, apprendi v new jersey florence alabama sheffield v state eric sterling parole bailey v us Glaze v State mount olive alabama self defense sexual assault drug crimes albertville alabama Thomas Hardiman mcwilliams v dunn heritage christian university state of arizona court of criminal appeals mountain brook alabama constitutional law, foley alabama smith v state dothan alabama sixth amendment campbell v state towles v state strickland v washington calhoun county alabama department of justice warrior alabama US Supreme Court Update Donald Trump, illegal gun carry utah v strieff fairfield alabama, tarrant alabama Samuel Alito animal cruelty arson christmas shooting debtor prison ferguson missouri ake v oklahoma nicholas hawkins Woods v State implied consent Alabaster alabama gadsden alabama Fentanyl levins v state public assistance fraud abuse Malone v State brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix utah supreme court drug activity narcotics investigation Alonzo Ephraim Pleasant Grove Alabama baltimore city circuit court huntsville alabama pell city alabama stanley brent chapman st clair county alabama street racing lethal injection 2016 election, pruitt v state making a murderer pinson alabama hurst v florida criminal mischief shooting death madison alabama Lucky D Arcade social media banville v state bernard v north dakota brendan dassey car accident nathan woods Briarwood Presbyterian Church stoves v state mulga alabama CCA update New York Times legende v state aziz sayyed texas brookside alabama moving violations npr economic growth Stephen Breyer shooting crime of passion death penalty habeas corpus relief drug smuggling alabama criminal law roundup warrantless blood draws bomb threat Xavier Beasley Hillary Clinton, eleventh circuit ruling second amendment moore v texas operation crackdown dekalb county alabama Guy Terrell Junior home repair fraud boaz alabama shoplifting robberies russell calhoun fort payne alabama illegal gambling criminal justice limestone county alabama pelham alabama state of alabama lauderdale county alabama judicial override serial betton v state adger alabama hoover alabama operation bullseye ring v arizona Kareem Dacar Gaymon rainbow city alabama battles v state Gardendale Alabama peyton pruitt morgan county alabama morris alabama drug possession, Shonda Walker, netflix fultondale alabama armed robbery Dylann Roof brady v maryland kenneth eugene billups capital punishment steve avery court systems, endangerment of a child Tracie Todd heflin alabama prostitution sting identity theft Kay Ivey Walker County Alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing clarence thomas negligent homicide sentencing law and policy blog summaries breaking and entering cherokee county alabama adnan syed, lamar county mike gilotti eugene lee jones v state gun control embezzlement Marengo County Alabama hoax destructive devices anniston alabama, felony assaults marion county 28 U.S.C. § 2254 scotus alabama law enforcement agency homicide cullman alabama LWOP church robberies Wesley Adam Whitworth constitutional violations hall v florida theft drug trafficking, murder assault OJ Simpson domestic violence OJ Simpson Made in America terell corey mcmullin hurst mandamus alabama supreme court homicide rate Adamsville alabama Joshua Reese asia mcclain sarah koenig William Pryor jerry bohannon the mannequin challenge § 13A-3-23 christian guitierez midazolam West Alabama ex parte briseno blount county alabama SCOTUS, huntsville alfonso morris keith v state aiding and abetting fake kidnapping, debit card skimming scams tuscaloosa alabama mccalla alabama concealed carry bessemer alabama drug busts trussville alabama Jefferson County Alabama death penalty, avondale alabama edwards v arizona springville alabama montgomery alabama Eutaw Alabama abduction editorial beylund v north dakota burglary Tommy Arthur Justice Sotomayor attempted murder alabama



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.