CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeal Releases from March 17, 2017

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, March 27, 2017


Keith v. State (CR-15-1319)

Keith pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and first-degree unlawful possession of marijuana after police found drugs under the front seat of his car during an inventory search. Officers pulled Keith over when they ran his license plate and realized the tag didn’t match his car. When they ran Keith’s ID, they discovered he had outstanding warrants and placed him under arrest. His car was searched as an inventory search and the drugs were found inside. Keith moved to suppress on the grounds that the search was improper warrantless search.

REVERSED. The Court concluded that the State failed to show that inventory search was carried out “according to standard criteria and on the basis of something other than suspicion of criminal activity.” The Court focused on Ex parte Boyd, 542 So. 2d 1276 (Ala. 1989), where the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that an inventory search was not valid because there was no evidence that law enforcement carried out the search pursuant to policy. Here, the Court found the same deficiencies that the Boyd court found: conclusory statements regarding following inventory policy, a lack of an inventory list, no copy of the policy was presented, and no evidence the officer followed that policy. Judge Joiner wrote a lengthy dissent.


Thoughts: I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Alabama Supreme Court take this issue up and ask for clarification for inventory searches andBoyd’s lasting effect. To me, inventory search precedent focuses on whether officers can show a search really was an administrative search and not a fishing expedition.


Sheffield v. State (CR-15-1467)

Sheffield was convicted of murder. He argued that he shot the victim in self-defense or by accident. At trial, the State introduced a recording of a heated phone conversation between the defendant and his wife, which was pretty damning to the defense -- she basically said he murdered the victim and didn’t act in self defense. Sheffield tried to invoke martial privilege to exclude the conversation, but the court allowed its introduction via Rule 804(b)(3) -- statements against interest. The State’s theory was that it was against the spouse’s interest for Sheffield to get convicted of murder.

REVERSED. The Court acknowledged that this was a question of first impression -- whether a declarant’s statements made against her spouse’s penal interest may also be considered against her own pecuniary or proprietary interest. In looking at Oregon case law, the Court concluded that the test as to whether a statement fits within the purview of Rule 804(b)(3) comes down to two central questions: (1) Was the declarant’s primary motive in making the statement to hurt or help her own interest; and (2) Was the risk to the declarant-spouse so great that the statements are inherently reliable? Here, the Court concluded the statements were not against Sheffield’s spouse’s interest (she wanted to divorce him), so they should not have been admitted under Rule 804(b)(3). Moreover, the Court concluded that this error wasn’t harmless given slight evidence presented surrounding the fatal moments.


Smith v. State (CR13-0055)

Smith was convicted of two counts of capital murder for a brutal kidnapping-murder/robbery-murder he carried out. At sentencing, the victim’s mother and sister testified that they believed the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for Smith. Smith argued on appeal that this testimony was improper.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED. The Court concluded the victim’s family’s recommendations were improper victim impact statements regarding recommended sentences under Booth v. Maryland. The Court found these statements to be plain error and vacated the death sentence.

Thoughts: I’m not going to be surprised if this gets reversed by the AL SC saying that this error didn’t rise to the level of plain error. I could see the AL SC using Judge Windom’s dissent as a blue print for re-imposing Smith’s death sentence.


Legendre v. State (CR-16-0008)

Legendre was on probation and his PO filed a delinquency report alleging that he failed to report, left the state without permission, didn’t pay supervision fees, failed to pay court-ordered moneys, failed to report to CRO and failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse program. At the hearing, the PO testified to trying to contact Legendre and how Legendre had missed meetings with her. In revoking, the court concluded that Legendre’s failure to report rose to the level of “absconding,” which allowed the court to fully revoke his probation. Legendre appealed claiming that he had not absconded.

AFFIRMED. The Court concluded that between his failure to report and his failure to communicate with the PO once she had contacted, the State presented sufficient evidence to prove that Legendre absconded and could be fully revoke.


Banville v. State (CR-15-1384)

The preclusive bar of Rule 32.2(d) does not bar a second Rule 32 petition if the first Rule 32 petition was based only upon Rule 32.1(f) -- a request to file an out-of-time appeal.


Campbell v. State (CR-15-1187)

Stoves v. State (CR-14-1687)

Both of these cases involved a reversal of one conviction on Double Jeopardy grounds (i.e., duplicate offenses), but an affirming of the remaining counts. Both are fact-intensive and not particularly noteworthy.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


birmingham alabama negligent homicide state of arizona assault fraud road rage second amendment clarence thomas limestone county alabama Sardis Alabama sexual assault armed robbery felony assaults Alonzo Ephraim arson ring v arizona constitutional violations Adamsville alabama fraudulent checks towles v state serial public assistance fraud Xavier Beasley alabama tuscaloosa alabama embezzlement bernard v north dakota cherokee county alabama Tracie Todd operation bullseye court systems, heritage christian university illegal gambling department of justice gadsden alabama foley alabama morgan county alabama peyton pruitt tarrant alabama hoax destructive devices utah supreme court Neil Gorsuch homicide rate gun control theft trussville alabama hoover alabama madison alabama capital murder dothan alabama adger alabama huntsville alabama asia mcclain criminal justice reform, kenneth eugene billups texas 2016 election, abandonment dora alabama drug busts huntsville st clair county alabama capital offenses stoves v state SCOTUS, russell calhoun mount olive alabama aiding and abetting concealed carry aziz sayyed criminal mischief oneonta alabama street racing sentencing law and policy blog summaries illegal gun carry apprendi v new jersey abuse Briarwood Presbyterian Church lamar county unlawful manufacturing constitutional law, Pleasant Grove Alabama Glaze v State banville v state endangerment of a child capital punishment minor offenses Donald Trump, underage drinking forced isolation Lucky D Arcade West Alabama morris alabama drug seizure anniston alabama, LWOP executions maryland court of special appeals drug smuggling Eutaw Alabama brady v maryland shooting death eric sterling debtor prison steve avery OJ Simpson Made in America murder Thomas Hardiman nicholas hawkins scotus Kay Ivey utah v strieff car accident sixth amendment dekalb county alabama netflix US Supreme Court Update abduction christian guitierez ex parte briseno montgomery alabama betton v state Stephen Breyer Tommy Arthur baltimore city circuit court New York Times self defense § 13A-3-23 § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing OJ Simpson pinson alabama William Pryor mike gilotti brian fredick lucas albertville alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix eleventh circuit ruling animal cruelty making a murderer shoplifting legende v state domestic abuse Ingmire v State implied consent church robberies lethal injection drugs Easter south carolina home repair fraud drug crimes habeas corpus relief robberies benjamin todd acton pell city alabama marion county npr decatur alabama ferguson missouri mountain brook alabama calhoun county alabama domestic violence baldwin county alabama pelham alabama drug trafficking, Etowah County Alabama, christmas shooting court of criminal appeals fort payne alabama Dylann Roof burglary social media Mike Hubbard hurst mandamus narcotics investigation the mannequin challenge mccalla alabama cullman alabama drug activity debit card skimming scams battles v state ake v oklahoma boaz alabama edwards v arizona department of justice, nathan woods editorial bessemer alabama brendan dassey economic growth crime of passion Shonda Walker, pruitt v state mulga alabama Marengo County Alabama fake kidnapping, warrantless blood draws judicial override adnan syed, death penalty, Rule 32 Woods v State criminal justice smith v state 28 U.S.C. § 2254 mcwilliams v dunn keith v state brookside alabama hall v florida Joshua Reese Justice Sotomayor drug possession, campbell v state fairfield alabama, blount county alabama Benn v State theft of property stanley brent chapman heflin alabama strickland v washington court of criminal appeal releases midazolam fourth amendment sarah koenig Alabaster alabama Fentanyl sheffield v state shooting fultondale alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon operation crackdown Gardendale Alabama attempted murder kidnapping eugene lee jones v state homicide alabama law enforcement agency Malone v State blountsville alabama levins v state springville alabama shelby county gun rights hanceville alabama death penalty Wesley Adam Whitworth prostitution sting rainbow city alabama CCA update Hillary Clinton, lethal injection alabama criminal law roundup moving violations birchfield v north dakota jerry bohannon warrior alabama lauderdale county alabama mobile alabama avondale alabama bomb threat state of alabama breaking and entering john earle redfearn IV v state greene county alabama bailey v us parole Walker County Alabama Jefferson County Alabama Samuel Alito alabama supreme court beylund v north dakota talladega superspeedway florence alabama eighth amendment, Guy Terrell Junior terell corey mcmullin alfonso morris identity theft hurst v florida kimberly alabama moore v texas



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.