CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeal Releases from March 17, 2017

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, March 27, 2017

 

Keith v. State (CR-15-1319)

Keith pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and first-degree unlawful possession of marijuana after police found drugs under the front seat of his car during an inventory search. Officers pulled Keith over when they ran his license plate and realized the tag didn’t match his car. When they ran Keith’s ID, they discovered he had outstanding warrants and placed him under arrest. His car was searched as an inventory search and the drugs were found inside. Keith moved to suppress on the grounds that the search was improper warrantless search.

REVERSED. The Court concluded that the State failed to show that inventory search was carried out “according to standard criteria and on the basis of something other than suspicion of criminal activity.” The Court focused on Ex parte Boyd, 542 So. 2d 1276 (Ala. 1989), where the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that an inventory search was not valid because there was no evidence that law enforcement carried out the search pursuant to policy. Here, the Court found the same deficiencies that the Boyd court found: conclusory statements regarding following inventory policy, a lack of an inventory list, no copy of the policy was presented, and no evidence the officer followed that policy. Judge Joiner wrote a lengthy dissent.

 

Thoughts: I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Alabama Supreme Court take this issue up and ask for clarification for inventory searches andBoyd’s lasting effect. To me, inventory search precedent focuses on whether officers can show a search really was an administrative search and not a fishing expedition.

 

Sheffield v. State (CR-15-1467)

Sheffield was convicted of murder. He argued that he shot the victim in self-defense or by accident. At trial, the State introduced a recording of a heated phone conversation between the defendant and his wife, which was pretty damning to the defense -- she basically said he murdered the victim and didn’t act in self defense. Sheffield tried to invoke martial privilege to exclude the conversation, but the court allowed its introduction via Rule 804(b)(3) -- statements against interest. The State’s theory was that it was against the spouse’s interest for Sheffield to get convicted of murder.

REVERSED. The Court acknowledged that this was a question of first impression -- whether a declarant’s statements made against her spouse’s penal interest may also be considered against her own pecuniary or proprietary interest. In looking at Oregon case law, the Court concluded that the test as to whether a statement fits within the purview of Rule 804(b)(3) comes down to two central questions: (1) Was the declarant’s primary motive in making the statement to hurt or help her own interest; and (2) Was the risk to the declarant-spouse so great that the statements are inherently reliable? Here, the Court concluded the statements were not against Sheffield’s spouse’s interest (she wanted to divorce him), so they should not have been admitted under Rule 804(b)(3). Moreover, the Court concluded that this error wasn’t harmless given slight evidence presented surrounding the fatal moments.

 

Smith v. State (CR13-0055)

Smith was convicted of two counts of capital murder for a brutal kidnapping-murder/robbery-murder he carried out. At sentencing, the victim’s mother and sister testified that they believed the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for Smith. Smith argued on appeal that this testimony was improper.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED. The Court concluded the victim’s family’s recommendations were improper victim impact statements regarding recommended sentences under Booth v. Maryland. The Court found these statements to be plain error and vacated the death sentence.

Thoughts: I’m not going to be surprised if this gets reversed by the AL SC saying that this error didn’t rise to the level of plain error. I could see the AL SC using Judge Windom’s dissent as a blue print for re-imposing Smith’s death sentence.

 

Legendre v. State (CR-16-0008)

Legendre was on probation and his PO filed a delinquency report alleging that he failed to report, left the state without permission, didn’t pay supervision fees, failed to pay court-ordered moneys, failed to report to CRO and failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse program. At the hearing, the PO testified to trying to contact Legendre and how Legendre had missed meetings with her. In revoking, the court concluded that Legendre’s failure to report rose to the level of “absconding,” which allowed the court to fully revoke his probation. Legendre appealed claiming that he had not absconded.

AFFIRMED. The Court concluded that between his failure to report and his failure to communicate with the PO once she had contacted, the State presented sufficient evidence to prove that Legendre absconded and could be fully revoke.

 

Banville v. State (CR-15-1384)

The preclusive bar of Rule 32.2(d) does not bar a second Rule 32 petition if the first Rule 32 petition was based only upon Rule 32.1(f) -- a request to file an out-of-time appeal.

 

Campbell v. State (CR-15-1187)

Stoves v. State (CR-14-1687)

Both of these cases involved a reversal of one conviction on Double Jeopardy grounds (i.e., duplicate offenses), but an affirming of the remaining counts. Both are fact-intensive and not particularly noteworthy.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

alabama law enforcement agency Adamsville alabama Lucky D Arcade fourth amendment underage drinking moving violations peyton pruitt Donald Trump, adger alabama capital murder implied consent Kareem Dacar Gaymon pelham alabama concealed carry abandonment armed robbery christmas shooting narcotics investigation felony assaults strickland v washington gun rights birchfield v north dakota Kay Ivey church robberies West Alabama kidnapping burglary scotus debit card skimming scams warrior alabama calhoun county alabama midazolam assault huntsville the mannequin challenge texas endangerment of a child aiding and abetting murder domestic abuse asia mcclain cullman alabama OJ Simpson Made in America debtor prison drug trafficking, embezzlement editorial unlawful manufacturing Neil Gorsuch marion county Justice Sotomayor legende v state executions bessemer alabama beylund v north dakota brady v maryland arson st clair county alabama fultondale alabama theft of property § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing shelby county Benn v State decatur alabama utah v strieff Woods v State ring v arizona john earle redfearn IV v state hurst mandamus sentencing law and policy blog summaries npr gadsden alabama operation crackdown drug smuggling christian guitierez apprendi v new jersey second amendment alfonso morris cherokee county alabama abuse benjamin todd acton department of justice, fairfield alabama, pinson alabama Alabaster alabama prostitution sting mountain brook alabama fort payne alabama animal cruelty Ingmire v State forced isolation madison alabama rainbow city alabama jerry bohannon bernard v north dakota Tommy Arthur court of criminal appeal releases robberies morgan county alabama hurst v florida huntsville alabama edwards v arizona Xavier Beasley anniston alabama, drug busts capital offenses fake kidnapping, breaking and entering identity theft blount county alabama smith v state Guy Terrell Junior serial banville v state russell calhoun pruitt v state Gardendale Alabama Joshua Reese morris alabama clarence thomas kimberly alabama death penalty foley alabama theft minor offenses crime of passion south carolina tarrant alabama kenneth eugene billups Hillary Clinton, attempted murder Rule 32 hall v florida 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dora alabama lethal injection illegal gambling Pleasant Grove Alabama car accident alabama supreme court bailey v us court systems, brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix sixth amendment § 13A-3-23 mcwilliams v dunn road rage homicide rate brian fredick lucas towles v state Mike Hubbard Etowah County Alabama, death penalty, shoplifting Wesley Adam Whitworth home repair fraud steve avery eugene lee jones v state state of arizona judicial override hoover alabama ex parte briseno Jefferson County Alabama mccalla alabama shooting court of criminal appeals social media shooting death dothan alabama heritage christian university terell corey mcmullin US Supreme Court Update oneonta alabama Alonzo Ephraim battles v state operation bullseye moore v texas Dylann Roof springville alabama eleventh circuit ruling public assistance fraud campbell v state tuscaloosa alabama criminal mischief drug activity negligent homicide self defense sexual assault nicholas hawkins LWOP department of justice trussville alabama nathan woods homicide dekalb county alabama betton v state stoves v state Samuel Alito economic growth pell city alabama lethal injection drugs Fentanyl parole limestone county alabama montgomery alabama keith v state lauderdale county alabama fraudulent checks brendan dassey Malone v State illegal gun carry sarah koenig Briarwood Presbyterian Church mount olive alabama Stephen Breyer mulga alabama William Pryor domestic violence drug possession, CCA update bomb threat avondale alabama lamar county talladega superspeedway boaz alabama brookside alabama Easter eric sterling street racing baldwin county alabama netflix levins v state blountsville alabama utah supreme court capital punishment drug seizure birmingham alabama Glaze v State baltimore city circuit court mike gilotti Marengo County Alabama Shonda Walker, albertville alabama criminal justice reform, ferguson missouri florence alabama OJ Simpson gun control constitutional law, Walker County Alabama constitutional violations SCOTUS, drug crimes hoax destructive devices maryland court of special appeals fraud adnan syed, 2016 election, criminal justice alabama alabama criminal law roundup Tracie Todd New York Times eighth amendment, sheffield v state habeas corpus relief hanceville alabama heflin alabama aziz sayyed stanley brent chapman Thomas Hardiman mobile alabama warrantless blood draws greene county alabama state of alabama abduction making a murderer Sardis Alabama Eutaw Alabama ake v oklahoma

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.