CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeal Releases from March 17, 2017

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, March 27, 2017


Keith v. State (CR-15-1319)

Keith pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and first-degree unlawful possession of marijuana after police found drugs under the front seat of his car during an inventory search. Officers pulled Keith over when they ran his license plate and realized the tag didn’t match his car. When they ran Keith’s ID, they discovered he had outstanding warrants and placed him under arrest. His car was searched as an inventory search and the drugs were found inside. Keith moved to suppress on the grounds that the search was improper warrantless search.

REVERSED. The Court concluded that the State failed to show that inventory search was carried out “according to standard criteria and on the basis of something other than suspicion of criminal activity.” The Court focused on Ex parte Boyd, 542 So. 2d 1276 (Ala. 1989), where the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that an inventory search was not valid because there was no evidence that law enforcement carried out the search pursuant to policy. Here, the Court found the same deficiencies that the Boyd court found: conclusory statements regarding following inventory policy, a lack of an inventory list, no copy of the policy was presented, and no evidence the officer followed that policy. Judge Joiner wrote a lengthy dissent.


Thoughts: I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Alabama Supreme Court take this issue up and ask for clarification for inventory searches andBoyd’s lasting effect. To me, inventory search precedent focuses on whether officers can show a search really was an administrative search and not a fishing expedition.


Sheffield v. State (CR-15-1467)

Sheffield was convicted of murder. He argued that he shot the victim in self-defense or by accident. At trial, the State introduced a recording of a heated phone conversation between the defendant and his wife, which was pretty damning to the defense -- she basically said he murdered the victim and didn’t act in self defense. Sheffield tried to invoke martial privilege to exclude the conversation, but the court allowed its introduction via Rule 804(b)(3) -- statements against interest. The State’s theory was that it was against the spouse’s interest for Sheffield to get convicted of murder.

REVERSED. The Court acknowledged that this was a question of first impression -- whether a declarant’s statements made against her spouse’s penal interest may also be considered against her own pecuniary or proprietary interest. In looking at Oregon case law, the Court concluded that the test as to whether a statement fits within the purview of Rule 804(b)(3) comes down to two central questions: (1) Was the declarant’s primary motive in making the statement to hurt or help her own interest; and (2) Was the risk to the declarant-spouse so great that the statements are inherently reliable? Here, the Court concluded the statements were not against Sheffield’s spouse’s interest (she wanted to divorce him), so they should not have been admitted under Rule 804(b)(3). Moreover, the Court concluded that this error wasn’t harmless given slight evidence presented surrounding the fatal moments.


Smith v. State (CR13-0055)

Smith was convicted of two counts of capital murder for a brutal kidnapping-murder/robbery-murder he carried out. At sentencing, the victim’s mother and sister testified that they believed the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for Smith. Smith argued on appeal that this testimony was improper.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED. The Court concluded the victim’s family’s recommendations were improper victim impact statements regarding recommended sentences under Booth v. Maryland. The Court found these statements to be plain error and vacated the death sentence.

Thoughts: I’m not going to be surprised if this gets reversed by the AL SC saying that this error didn’t rise to the level of plain error. I could see the AL SC using Judge Windom’s dissent as a blue print for re-imposing Smith’s death sentence.


Legendre v. State (CR-16-0008)

Legendre was on probation and his PO filed a delinquency report alleging that he failed to report, left the state without permission, didn’t pay supervision fees, failed to pay court-ordered moneys, failed to report to CRO and failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse program. At the hearing, the PO testified to trying to contact Legendre and how Legendre had missed meetings with her. In revoking, the court concluded that Legendre’s failure to report rose to the level of “absconding,” which allowed the court to fully revoke his probation. Legendre appealed claiming that he had not absconded.

AFFIRMED. The Court concluded that between his failure to report and his failure to communicate with the PO once she had contacted, the State presented sufficient evidence to prove that Legendre absconded and could be fully revoke.


Banville v. State (CR-15-1384)

The preclusive bar of Rule 32.2(d) does not bar a second Rule 32 petition if the first Rule 32 petition was based only upon Rule 32.1(f) -- a request to file an out-of-time appeal.


Campbell v. State (CR-15-1187)

Stoves v. State (CR-14-1687)

Both of these cases involved a reversal of one conviction on Double Jeopardy grounds (i.e., duplicate offenses), but an affirming of the remaining counts. Both are fact-intensive and not particularly noteworthy.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


alabama criminal law roundup peyton pruitt church robberies Gardendale Alabama dekalb county alabama court systems, eleventh circuit ruling christian guitierez bailey v us montgomery alabama brendan dassey second amendment drug smuggling warrior alabama CCA update ferguson missouri betton v state alabama LWOP domestic abuse Eutaw Alabama terell corey mcmullin Neil Gorsuch sheffield v state jerry bohannon Alabaster alabama abandonment mount olive alabama limestone county alabama cherokee county alabama Dylann Roof street racing bessemer alabama blountsville alabama heflin alabama shoplifting marion county New York Times habeas corpus relief npr oneonta alabama drug seizure albertville alabama Xavier Beasley shooting death self defense adger alabama abuse mike gilotti rainbow city alabama Joshua Reese road rage bomb threat lauderdale county alabama forced isolation Wesley Adam Whitworth Woods v State nicholas hawkins constitutional violations huntsville burglary stanley brent chapman alabama law enforcement agency Walker County Alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix blount county alabama Adamsville alabama lamar county aiding and abetting operation crackdown legende v state beylund v north dakota Ingmire v State Kay Ivey underage drinking narcotics investigation Kareem Dacar Gaymon hall v florida eric sterling apprendi v new jersey OJ Simpson abduction talladega superspeedway Glaze v State fraudulent checks hoax destructive devices court of criminal appeals midazolam animal cruelty illegal gambling ex parte briseno fairfield alabama, breaking and entering department of justice Easter theft of property car accident criminal mischief strickland v washington executions mcwilliams v dunn cullman alabama Shonda Walker, Thomas Hardiman unlawful manufacturing boaz alabama gadsden alabama greene county alabama minor offenses bernard v north dakota aziz sayyed huntsville alabama moore v texas Stephen Breyer identity theft § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing fake kidnapping, kenneth eugene billups eugene lee jones v state state of alabama implied consent brady v maryland pinson alabama lethal injection drugs theft parole netflix tarrant alabama drug possession, capital murder hanceville alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 baldwin county alabama criminal justice decatur alabama crime of passion hurst mandamus death penalty Fentanyl steve avery john earle redfearn IV v state benjamin todd acton kimberly alabama morris alabama sarah koenig madison alabama state of arizona operation bullseye scotus battles v state Marengo County Alabama lethal injection adnan syed, US Supreme Court Update capital punishment Malone v State § 13A-3-23 arson nathan woods mountain brook alabama south carolina sentencing law and policy blog summaries Donald Trump, endangerment of a child Jefferson County Alabama criminal justice reform, fort payne alabama foley alabama fraud Samuel Alito stoves v state illegal gun carry mobile alabama pell city alabama kidnapping serial concealed carry florence alabama baltimore city circuit court mccalla alabama Tracie Todd Tommy Arthur Justice Sotomayor maryland court of special appeals trussville alabama anniston alabama, calhoun county alabama public assistance fraud negligent homicide Pleasant Grove Alabama gun rights ake v oklahoma fourth amendment death penalty, st clair county alabama Etowah County Alabama, birmingham alabama capital offenses asia mcclain debit card skimming scams edwards v arizona utah supreme court economic growth court of criminal appeal releases homicide rate shelby county mulga alabama Mike Hubbard home repair fraud christmas shooting dothan alabama embezzlement pruitt v state utah v strieff West Alabama debtor prison springville alabama smith v state texas William Pryor Guy Terrell Junior sixth amendment ring v arizona Alonzo Ephraim warrantless blood draws hoover alabama banville v state pelham alabama brian fredick lucas murder domestic violence alabama supreme court clarence thomas drug crimes alfonso morris eighth amendment, shooting robberies dora alabama drug activity Hillary Clinton, birchfield v north dakota the mannequin challenge felony assaults department of justice, attempted murder making a murderer tuscaloosa alabama armed robbery avondale alabama SCOTUS, assault drug busts Sardis Alabama heritage christian university Briarwood Presbyterian Church morgan county alabama hurst v florida editorial OJ Simpson Made in America levins v state Benn v State judicial override keith v state campbell v state Rule 32 homicide towles v state fultondale alabama 2016 election, gun control moving violations sexual assault prostitution sting brookside alabama russell calhoun drug trafficking, social media Lucky D Arcade constitutional law,



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.