CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeal Releases from March 17, 2017

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, March 27, 2017


Keith v. State (CR-15-1319)

Keith pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and first-degree unlawful possession of marijuana after police found drugs under the front seat of his car during an inventory search. Officers pulled Keith over when they ran his license plate and realized the tag didn’t match his car. When they ran Keith’s ID, they discovered he had outstanding warrants and placed him under arrest. His car was searched as an inventory search and the drugs were found inside. Keith moved to suppress on the grounds that the search was improper warrantless search.

REVERSED. The Court concluded that the State failed to show that inventory search was carried out “according to standard criteria and on the basis of something other than suspicion of criminal activity.” The Court focused on Ex parte Boyd, 542 So. 2d 1276 (Ala. 1989), where the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that an inventory search was not valid because there was no evidence that law enforcement carried out the search pursuant to policy. Here, the Court found the same deficiencies that the Boyd court found: conclusory statements regarding following inventory policy, a lack of an inventory list, no copy of the policy was presented, and no evidence the officer followed that policy. Judge Joiner wrote a lengthy dissent.


Thoughts: I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Alabama Supreme Court take this issue up and ask for clarification for inventory searches andBoyd’s lasting effect. To me, inventory search precedent focuses on whether officers can show a search really was an administrative search and not a fishing expedition.


Sheffield v. State (CR-15-1467)

Sheffield was convicted of murder. He argued that he shot the victim in self-defense or by accident. At trial, the State introduced a recording of a heated phone conversation between the defendant and his wife, which was pretty damning to the defense -- she basically said he murdered the victim and didn’t act in self defense. Sheffield tried to invoke martial privilege to exclude the conversation, but the court allowed its introduction via Rule 804(b)(3) -- statements against interest. The State’s theory was that it was against the spouse’s interest for Sheffield to get convicted of murder.

REVERSED. The Court acknowledged that this was a question of first impression -- whether a declarant’s statements made against her spouse’s penal interest may also be considered against her own pecuniary or proprietary interest. In looking at Oregon case law, the Court concluded that the test as to whether a statement fits within the purview of Rule 804(b)(3) comes down to two central questions: (1) Was the declarant’s primary motive in making the statement to hurt or help her own interest; and (2) Was the risk to the declarant-spouse so great that the statements are inherently reliable? Here, the Court concluded the statements were not against Sheffield’s spouse’s interest (she wanted to divorce him), so they should not have been admitted under Rule 804(b)(3). Moreover, the Court concluded that this error wasn’t harmless given slight evidence presented surrounding the fatal moments.


Smith v. State (CR13-0055)

Smith was convicted of two counts of capital murder for a brutal kidnapping-murder/robbery-murder he carried out. At sentencing, the victim’s mother and sister testified that they believed the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for Smith. Smith argued on appeal that this testimony was improper.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED. The Court concluded the victim’s family’s recommendations were improper victim impact statements regarding recommended sentences under Booth v. Maryland. The Court found these statements to be plain error and vacated the death sentence.

Thoughts: I’m not going to be surprised if this gets reversed by the AL SC saying that this error didn’t rise to the level of plain error. I could see the AL SC using Judge Windom’s dissent as a blue print for re-imposing Smith’s death sentence.


Legendre v. State (CR-16-0008)

Legendre was on probation and his PO filed a delinquency report alleging that he failed to report, left the state without permission, didn’t pay supervision fees, failed to pay court-ordered moneys, failed to report to CRO and failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse program. At the hearing, the PO testified to trying to contact Legendre and how Legendre had missed meetings with her. In revoking, the court concluded that Legendre’s failure to report rose to the level of “absconding,” which allowed the court to fully revoke his probation. Legendre appealed claiming that he had not absconded.

AFFIRMED. The Court concluded that between his failure to report and his failure to communicate with the PO once she had contacted, the State presented sufficient evidence to prove that Legendre absconded and could be fully revoke.


Banville v. State (CR-15-1384)

The preclusive bar of Rule 32.2(d) does not bar a second Rule 32 petition if the first Rule 32 petition was based only upon Rule 32.1(f) -- a request to file an out-of-time appeal.


Campbell v. State (CR-15-1187)

Stoves v. State (CR-14-1687)

Both of these cases involved a reversal of one conviction on Double Jeopardy grounds (i.e., duplicate offenses), but an affirming of the remaining counts. Both are fact-intensive and not particularly noteworthy.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


alabama supreme court embezzlement eleventh circuit ruling tarrant alabama npr Adamsville alabama implied consent dora alabama debit card skimming scams jerry bohannon mobile alabama social media making a murderer mcwilliams v dunn foley alabama lethal injection heflin alabama warrantless blood draws drug smuggling decatur alabama murder Glaze v State albertville alabama CCA update midazolam tuscaloosa alabama capital punishment § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing boaz alabama illegal gambling bailey v us hoax destructive devices Woods v State smith v state apprendi v new jersey campbell v state alabama law enforcement agency forced isolation aiding and abetting operation crackdown betton v state department of justice illegal gun carry warrior alabama pelham alabama road rage avondale alabama cherokee county alabama concealed carry netflix narcotics investigation OJ Simpson Made in America armed robbery hurst mandamus towles v state hanceville alabama hurst v florida dekalb county alabama breaking and entering eric sterling bernard v north dakota public assistance fraud negligent homicide Guy Terrell Junior aziz sayyed Xavier Beasley parole fraud abandonment debtor prison 2016 election, fourth amendment john earle redfearn IV v state self defense Wesley Adam Whitworth alabama criminal law roundup fairfield alabama, SCOTUS, nathan woods Justice Sotomayor mike gilotti drug busts court of criminal appeals stanley brent chapman state of arizona oneonta alabama south carolina adger alabama edwards v arizona street racing Mike Hubbard Easter christmas shooting abuse legende v state brian fredick lucas Ingmire v State Pleasant Grove Alabama madison alabama christian guitierez st clair county alabama marion county § 13A-3-23 Rule 32 fultondale alabama sarah koenig adnan syed, russell calhoun maryland court of special appeals minor offenses drug activity Jefferson County Alabama criminal mischief moore v texas Alonzo Ephraim Samuel Alito shelby county church robberies executions brookside alabama brady v maryland utah v strieff sentencing law and policy blog summaries shooting death car accident Kay Ivey alabama drug trafficking, Tracie Todd levins v state texas fraudulent checks ex parte briseno gadsden alabama heritage christian university blountsville alabama birmingham alabama huntsville alabama sixth amendment Marengo County Alabama limestone county alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church crime of passion fake kidnapping, sheffield v state theft strickland v washington nicholas hawkins prostitution sting brendan dassey New York Times shooting attempted murder pruitt v state florence alabama kidnapping domestic abuse Sardis Alabama endangerment of a child ferguson missouri moving violations Neil Gorsuch state of alabama hoover alabama Alabaster alabama cullman alabama Benn v State stoves v state homicide criminal justice reform, banville v state abduction Tommy Arthur mccalla alabama robberies felony assaults home repair fraud mulga alabama capital offenses mount olive alabama huntsville bomb threat kenneth eugene billups the mannequin challenge drug possession, dothan alabama benjamin todd acton editorial homicide rate constitutional law, utah supreme court serial steve avery burglary department of justice, judicial override brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix William Pryor peyton pruitt morgan county alabama baltimore city circuit court Hillary Clinton, gun rights scotus shoplifting clarence thomas drug seizure court systems, mountain brook alabama Thomas Hardiman ake v oklahoma pinson alabama constitutional violations 28 U.S.C. § 2254 pell city alabama Stephen Breyer second amendment animal cruelty OJ Simpson hall v florida Kareem Dacar Gaymon birchfield v north dakota Donald Trump, beylund v north dakota lamar county kimberly alabama morris alabama criminal justice trussville alabama death penalty, theft of property baldwin county alabama bessemer alabama rainbow city alabama battles v state eugene lee jones v state gun control death penalty Walker County Alabama Eutaw Alabama greene county alabama LWOP operation bullseye alfonso morris montgomery alabama capital murder US Supreme Court Update calhoun county alabama talladega superspeedway court of criminal appeal releases economic growth Shonda Walker, drug crimes sexual assault habeas corpus relief Joshua Reese Gardendale Alabama Dylann Roof lauderdale county alabama West Alabama ring v arizona Lucky D Arcade anniston alabama, identity theft domestic violence Malone v State eighth amendment, keith v state underage drinking Fentanyl blount county alabama Etowah County Alabama, terell corey mcmullin unlawful manufacturing assault springville alabama fort payne alabama lethal injection drugs arson asia mcclain



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.