CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeal Releases from March 17, 2017

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, March 27, 2017

 

Keith v. State (CR-15-1319)

Keith pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and first-degree unlawful possession of marijuana after police found drugs under the front seat of his car during an inventory search. Officers pulled Keith over when they ran his license plate and realized the tag didn’t match his car. When they ran Keith’s ID, they discovered he had outstanding warrants and placed him under arrest. His car was searched as an inventory search and the drugs were found inside. Keith moved to suppress on the grounds that the search was improper warrantless search.

REVERSED. The Court concluded that the State failed to show that inventory search was carried out “according to standard criteria and on the basis of something other than suspicion of criminal activity.” The Court focused on Ex parte Boyd, 542 So. 2d 1276 (Ala. 1989), where the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that an inventory search was not valid because there was no evidence that law enforcement carried out the search pursuant to policy. Here, the Court found the same deficiencies that the Boyd court found: conclusory statements regarding following inventory policy, a lack of an inventory list, no copy of the policy was presented, and no evidence the officer followed that policy. Judge Joiner wrote a lengthy dissent.

 

Thoughts: I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Alabama Supreme Court take this issue up and ask for clarification for inventory searches andBoyd’s lasting effect. To me, inventory search precedent focuses on whether officers can show a search really was an administrative search and not a fishing expedition.

 

Sheffield v. State (CR-15-1467)

Sheffield was convicted of murder. He argued that he shot the victim in self-defense or by accident. At trial, the State introduced a recording of a heated phone conversation between the defendant and his wife, which was pretty damning to the defense -- she basically said he murdered the victim and didn’t act in self defense. Sheffield tried to invoke martial privilege to exclude the conversation, but the court allowed its introduction via Rule 804(b)(3) -- statements against interest. The State’s theory was that it was against the spouse’s interest for Sheffield to get convicted of murder.

REVERSED. The Court acknowledged that this was a question of first impression -- whether a declarant’s statements made against her spouse’s penal interest may also be considered against her own pecuniary or proprietary interest. In looking at Oregon case law, the Court concluded that the test as to whether a statement fits within the purview of Rule 804(b)(3) comes down to two central questions: (1) Was the declarant’s primary motive in making the statement to hurt or help her own interest; and (2) Was the risk to the declarant-spouse so great that the statements are inherently reliable? Here, the Court concluded the statements were not against Sheffield’s spouse’s interest (she wanted to divorce him), so they should not have been admitted under Rule 804(b)(3). Moreover, the Court concluded that this error wasn’t harmless given slight evidence presented surrounding the fatal moments.

 

Smith v. State (CR13-0055)

Smith was convicted of two counts of capital murder for a brutal kidnapping-murder/robbery-murder he carried out. At sentencing, the victim’s mother and sister testified that they believed the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for Smith. Smith argued on appeal that this testimony was improper.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED. The Court concluded the victim’s family’s recommendations were improper victim impact statements regarding recommended sentences under Booth v. Maryland. The Court found these statements to be plain error and vacated the death sentence.

Thoughts: I’m not going to be surprised if this gets reversed by the AL SC saying that this error didn’t rise to the level of plain error. I could see the AL SC using Judge Windom’s dissent as a blue print for re-imposing Smith’s death sentence.

 

Legendre v. State (CR-16-0008)

Legendre was on probation and his PO filed a delinquency report alleging that he failed to report, left the state without permission, didn’t pay supervision fees, failed to pay court-ordered moneys, failed to report to CRO and failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse program. At the hearing, the PO testified to trying to contact Legendre and how Legendre had missed meetings with her. In revoking, the court concluded that Legendre’s failure to report rose to the level of “absconding,” which allowed the court to fully revoke his probation. Legendre appealed claiming that he had not absconded.

AFFIRMED. The Court concluded that between his failure to report and his failure to communicate with the PO once she had contacted, the State presented sufficient evidence to prove that Legendre absconded and could be fully revoke.

 

Banville v. State (CR-15-1384)

The preclusive bar of Rule 32.2(d) does not bar a second Rule 32 petition if the first Rule 32 petition was based only upon Rule 32.1(f) -- a request to file an out-of-time appeal.

 

Campbell v. State (CR-15-1187)

Stoves v. State (CR-14-1687)

Both of these cases involved a reversal of one conviction on Double Jeopardy grounds (i.e., duplicate offenses), but an affirming of the remaining counts. Both are fact-intensive and not particularly noteworthy.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

Malone v State home repair fraud Justice Sotomayor battles v state nathan woods narcotics investigation beylund v north dakota Etowah County Alabama, smith v state Hillary Clinton, lauderdale county alabama heflin alabama animal cruelty Marengo County Alabama limestone county alabama breaking and entering drug trafficking, hurst mandamus legende v state bessemer alabama brookside alabama decatur alabama sixth amendment robberies aiding and abetting pruitt v state lethal injection aziz sayyed russell calhoun debit card skimming scams Dylann Roof implied consent capital punishment lethal injection drugs pelham alabama lamar county illegal gun carry concealed carry arson fraud constitutional law, huntsville alabama sentencing law and policy blog summaries burglary Alonzo Ephraim calhoun county alabama pinson alabama abandonment § 13A-3-23 constitutional violations hoover alabama christian guitierez huntsville shooting death domestic abuse Joshua Reese armed robbery dothan alabama albertville alabama kidnapping warrantless blood draws stoves v state drug possession, hanceville alabama greene county alabama murder capital murder Tommy Arthur Easter second amendment the mannequin challenge road rage ring v arizona court systems, bomb threat utah supreme court ferguson missouri public assistance fraud executions Kay Ivey bernard v north dakota Kareem Dacar Gaymon attempted murder strickland v washington 28 U.S.C. § 2254 2016 election, Glaze v State tarrant alabama brian fredick lucas rainbow city alabama Stephen Breyer campbell v state prostitution sting terell corey mcmullin cullman alabama npr gadsden alabama drug seizure kimberly alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama morgan county alabama criminal justice reform, hurst v florida adger alabama midazolam brady v maryland theft Walker County Alabama bailey v us Tracie Todd endangerment of a child identity theft baldwin county alabama economic growth cherokee county alabama habeas corpus relief capital offenses clarence thomas drug activity § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing dora alabama state of arizona marion county jerry bohannon SCOTUS, moving violations shooting tuscaloosa alabama Lucky D Arcade Benn v State heritage christian university mike gilotti baltimore city circuit court netflix William Pryor st clair county alabama warrior alabama nicholas hawkins Guy Terrell Junior department of justice, fultondale alabama CCA update texas Wesley Adam Whitworth fairfield alabama, montgomery alabama Shonda Walker, Adamsville alabama springville alabama Sardis Alabama New York Times kenneth eugene billups mccalla alabama alabama Xavier Beasley Jefferson County Alabama avondale alabama church robberies hall v florida brendan dassey alabama law enforcement agency birmingham alabama Woods v State banville v state Alabaster alabama florence alabama death penalty, Donald Trump, dekalb county alabama gun control Gardendale Alabama mountain brook alabama abduction operation bullseye Eutaw Alabama alfonso morris maryland court of special appeals forced isolation operation crackdown mount olive alabama street racing embezzlement debtor prison eighth amendment, apprendi v new jersey drug crimes serial hoax destructive devices towles v state Thomas Hardiman ake v oklahoma Mike Hubbard shoplifting parole steve avery levins v state drug smuggling south carolina blount county alabama death penalty theft of property court of criminal appeals Neil Gorsuch unlawful manufacturing eric sterling criminal mischief making a murderer eugene lee jones v state fourth amendment fort payne alabama West Alabama christmas shooting underage drinking abuse boaz alabama fraudulent checks moore v texas negligent homicide Fentanyl brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix mcwilliams v dunn benjamin todd acton stanley brent chapman talladega superspeedway assault criminal justice department of justice Ingmire v State homicide crime of passion court of criminal appeal releases ex parte briseno shelby county peyton pruitt foley alabama blountsville alabama Samuel Alito sarah koenig alabama criminal law roundup drug busts keith v state mulga alabama mobile alabama Rule 32 US Supreme Court Update trussville alabama birchfield v north dakota alabama supreme court state of alabama eleventh circuit ruling anniston alabama, OJ Simpson Made in America scotus self defense felony assaults utah v strieff homicide rate oneonta alabama domestic violence pell city alabama OJ Simpson madison alabama judicial override car accident social media edwards v arizona asia mcclain sexual assault fake kidnapping, editorial minor offenses morris alabama gun rights illegal gambling Briarwood Presbyterian Church LWOP john earle redfearn IV v state adnan syed, betton v state sheffield v state

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.