CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeal Releases from March 17, 2017

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, March 27, 2017

 

Keith v. State (CR-15-1319)

Keith pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and first-degree unlawful possession of marijuana after police found drugs under the front seat of his car during an inventory search. Officers pulled Keith over when they ran his license plate and realized the tag didn’t match his car. When they ran Keith’s ID, they discovered he had outstanding warrants and placed him under arrest. His car was searched as an inventory search and the drugs were found inside. Keith moved to suppress on the grounds that the search was improper warrantless search.

REVERSED. The Court concluded that the State failed to show that inventory search was carried out “according to standard criteria and on the basis of something other than suspicion of criminal activity.” The Court focused on Ex parte Boyd, 542 So. 2d 1276 (Ala. 1989), where the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that an inventory search was not valid because there was no evidence that law enforcement carried out the search pursuant to policy. Here, the Court found the same deficiencies that the Boyd court found: conclusory statements regarding following inventory policy, a lack of an inventory list, no copy of the policy was presented, and no evidence the officer followed that policy. Judge Joiner wrote a lengthy dissent.

 

Thoughts: I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Alabama Supreme Court take this issue up and ask for clarification for inventory searches andBoyd’s lasting effect. To me, inventory search precedent focuses on whether officers can show a search really was an administrative search and not a fishing expedition.

 

Sheffield v. State (CR-15-1467)

Sheffield was convicted of murder. He argued that he shot the victim in self-defense or by accident. At trial, the State introduced a recording of a heated phone conversation between the defendant and his wife, which was pretty damning to the defense -- she basically said he murdered the victim and didn’t act in self defense. Sheffield tried to invoke martial privilege to exclude the conversation, but the court allowed its introduction via Rule 804(b)(3) -- statements against interest. The State’s theory was that it was against the spouse’s interest for Sheffield to get convicted of murder.

REVERSED. The Court acknowledged that this was a question of first impression -- whether a declarant’s statements made against her spouse’s penal interest may also be considered against her own pecuniary or proprietary interest. In looking at Oregon case law, the Court concluded that the test as to whether a statement fits within the purview of Rule 804(b)(3) comes down to two central questions: (1) Was the declarant’s primary motive in making the statement to hurt or help her own interest; and (2) Was the risk to the declarant-spouse so great that the statements are inherently reliable? Here, the Court concluded the statements were not against Sheffield’s spouse’s interest (she wanted to divorce him), so they should not have been admitted under Rule 804(b)(3). Moreover, the Court concluded that this error wasn’t harmless given slight evidence presented surrounding the fatal moments.

 

Smith v. State (CR13-0055)

Smith was convicted of two counts of capital murder for a brutal kidnapping-murder/robbery-murder he carried out. At sentencing, the victim’s mother and sister testified that they believed the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for Smith. Smith argued on appeal that this testimony was improper.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED. The Court concluded the victim’s family’s recommendations were improper victim impact statements regarding recommended sentences under Booth v. Maryland. The Court found these statements to be plain error and vacated the death sentence.

Thoughts: I’m not going to be surprised if this gets reversed by the AL SC saying that this error didn’t rise to the level of plain error. I could see the AL SC using Judge Windom’s dissent as a blue print for re-imposing Smith’s death sentence.

 

Legendre v. State (CR-16-0008)

Legendre was on probation and his PO filed a delinquency report alleging that he failed to report, left the state without permission, didn’t pay supervision fees, failed to pay court-ordered moneys, failed to report to CRO and failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse program. At the hearing, the PO testified to trying to contact Legendre and how Legendre had missed meetings with her. In revoking, the court concluded that Legendre’s failure to report rose to the level of “absconding,” which allowed the court to fully revoke his probation. Legendre appealed claiming that he had not absconded.

AFFIRMED. The Court concluded that between his failure to report and his failure to communicate with the PO once she had contacted, the State presented sufficient evidence to prove that Legendre absconded and could be fully revoke.

 

Banville v. State (CR-15-1384)

The preclusive bar of Rule 32.2(d) does not bar a second Rule 32 petition if the first Rule 32 petition was based only upon Rule 32.1(f) -- a request to file an out-of-time appeal.

 

Campbell v. State (CR-15-1187)

Stoves v. State (CR-14-1687)

Both of these cases involved a reversal of one conviction on Double Jeopardy grounds (i.e., duplicate offenses), but an affirming of the remaining counts. Both are fact-intensive and not particularly noteworthy.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

abuse self defense birmingham alabama department of justice, Kareem Dacar Gaymon betton v state Wesley Adam Whitworth ferguson missouri theft sheffield v state christmas shooting capital punishment felony assaults avondale alabama terell corey mcmullin social media abandonment underage drinking criminal justice dekalb county alabama Jefferson County Alabama marion county minor offenses heflin alabama attempted murder aziz sayyed bomb threat Joshua Reese warrior alabama CCA update arson blountsville alabama huntsville alabama Rule 32 car accident texas New York Times bailey v us Stephen Breyer forced isolation morris alabama campbell v state heritage christian university crime of passion identity theft shooting death Benn v State moving violations cullman alabama executions warrantless blood draws assault breaking and entering Walker County Alabama domestic abuse Alabaster alabama brookside alabama sixth amendment maryland court of special appeals death penalty, kimberly alabama trussville alabama kenneth eugene billups pruitt v state netflix church robberies alfonso morris smith v state decatur alabama tuscaloosa alabama dora alabama death penalty baltimore city circuit court constitutional law, Dylann Roof hoax destructive devices public assistance fraud embezzlement brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix narcotics investigation strickland v washington drug seizure murder nathan woods eric sterling parole habeas corpus relief madison alabama lethal injection drugs hanceville alabama cherokee county alabama Alonzo Ephraim 28 U.S.C. § 2254 florence alabama economic growth asia mcclain eugene lee jones v state Marengo County Alabama road rage home repair fraud moore v texas making a murderer judicial override endangerment of a child mulga alabama illegal gun carry utah supreme court William Pryor foley alabama alabama supreme court Eutaw Alabama OJ Simpson ring v arizona legende v state mike gilotti npr constitutional violations shooting pelham alabama Kay Ivey capital offenses pell city alabama south carolina hurst mandamus mobile alabama concealed carry hoover alabama aiding and abetting brady v maryland US Supreme Court Update state of arizona Fentanyl Gardendale Alabama Guy Terrell Junior Lucky D Arcade drug trafficking, the mannequin challenge ake v oklahoma mountain brook alabama homicide rate lamar county LWOP Tracie Todd Hillary Clinton, anniston alabama, shoplifting gadsden alabama Justice Sotomayor brendan dassey serial tarrant alabama christian guitierez drug possession, stoves v state court of criminal appeals homicide fultondale alabama bessemer alabama Neil Gorsuch fraudulent checks clarence thomas kidnapping Easter Sardis Alabama animal cruelty brian fredick lucas department of justice armed robbery capital murder greene county alabama eleventh circuit ruling beylund v north dakota benjamin todd acton state of alabama boaz alabama huntsville fourth amendment talladega superspeedway alabama law enforcement agency dothan alabama criminal justice reform, midazolam Shonda Walker, editorial albertville alabama apprendi v new jersey Samuel Alito Etowah County Alabama, sentencing law and policy blog summaries abduction shelby county john earle redfearn IV v state Woods v State Xavier Beasley Ingmire v State street racing lethal injection Donald Trump, fraud prostitution sting hall v florida russell calhoun bernard v north dakota West Alabama eighth amendment, negligent homicide keith v state ex parte briseno debtor prison Mike Hubbard sexual assault adger alabama drug smuggling steve avery banville v state OJ Simpson Made in America peyton pruitt adnan syed, stanley brent chapman Thomas Hardiman Adamsville alabama birchfield v north dakota morgan county alabama alabama sarah koenig limestone county alabama illegal gambling Glaze v State robberies operation crackdown unlawful manufacturing Pleasant Grove Alabama pinson alabama court of criminal appeal releases mccalla alabama utah v strieff mount olive alabama blount county alabama fairfield alabama, drug activity burglary operation bullseye domestic violence drug busts springville alabama second amendment drug crimes SCOTUS, calhoun county alabama criminal mischief gun rights towles v state Malone v State Tommy Arthur levins v state montgomery alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church oneonta alabama scotus jerry bohannon alabama criminal law roundup nicholas hawkins debit card skimming scams rainbow city alabama battles v state fort payne alabama fake kidnapping, court systems, edwards v arizona mcwilliams v dunn hurst v florida § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing st clair county alabama lauderdale county alabama baldwin county alabama gun control theft of property 2016 election, implied consent § 13A-3-23

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.