CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeal Releases from March 17, 2017

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, March 27, 2017


Keith v. State (CR-15-1319)

Keith pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and first-degree unlawful possession of marijuana after police found drugs under the front seat of his car during an inventory search. Officers pulled Keith over when they ran his license plate and realized the tag didn’t match his car. When they ran Keith’s ID, they discovered he had outstanding warrants and placed him under arrest. His car was searched as an inventory search and the drugs were found inside. Keith moved to suppress on the grounds that the search was improper warrantless search.

REVERSED. The Court concluded that the State failed to show that inventory search was carried out “according to standard criteria and on the basis of something other than suspicion of criminal activity.” The Court focused on Ex parte Boyd, 542 So. 2d 1276 (Ala. 1989), where the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that an inventory search was not valid because there was no evidence that law enforcement carried out the search pursuant to policy. Here, the Court found the same deficiencies that the Boyd court found: conclusory statements regarding following inventory policy, a lack of an inventory list, no copy of the policy was presented, and no evidence the officer followed that policy. Judge Joiner wrote a lengthy dissent.


Thoughts: I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Alabama Supreme Court take this issue up and ask for clarification for inventory searches andBoyd’s lasting effect. To me, inventory search precedent focuses on whether officers can show a search really was an administrative search and not a fishing expedition.


Sheffield v. State (CR-15-1467)

Sheffield was convicted of murder. He argued that he shot the victim in self-defense or by accident. At trial, the State introduced a recording of a heated phone conversation between the defendant and his wife, which was pretty damning to the defense -- she basically said he murdered the victim and didn’t act in self defense. Sheffield tried to invoke martial privilege to exclude the conversation, but the court allowed its introduction via Rule 804(b)(3) -- statements against interest. The State’s theory was that it was against the spouse’s interest for Sheffield to get convicted of murder.

REVERSED. The Court acknowledged that this was a question of first impression -- whether a declarant’s statements made against her spouse’s penal interest may also be considered against her own pecuniary or proprietary interest. In looking at Oregon case law, the Court concluded that the test as to whether a statement fits within the purview of Rule 804(b)(3) comes down to two central questions: (1) Was the declarant’s primary motive in making the statement to hurt or help her own interest; and (2) Was the risk to the declarant-spouse so great that the statements are inherently reliable? Here, the Court concluded the statements were not against Sheffield’s spouse’s interest (she wanted to divorce him), so they should not have been admitted under Rule 804(b)(3). Moreover, the Court concluded that this error wasn’t harmless given slight evidence presented surrounding the fatal moments.


Smith v. State (CR13-0055)

Smith was convicted of two counts of capital murder for a brutal kidnapping-murder/robbery-murder he carried out. At sentencing, the victim’s mother and sister testified that they believed the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for Smith. Smith argued on appeal that this testimony was improper.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED. The Court concluded the victim’s family’s recommendations were improper victim impact statements regarding recommended sentences under Booth v. Maryland. The Court found these statements to be plain error and vacated the death sentence.

Thoughts: I’m not going to be surprised if this gets reversed by the AL SC saying that this error didn’t rise to the level of plain error. I could see the AL SC using Judge Windom’s dissent as a blue print for re-imposing Smith’s death sentence.


Legendre v. State (CR-16-0008)

Legendre was on probation and his PO filed a delinquency report alleging that he failed to report, left the state without permission, didn’t pay supervision fees, failed to pay court-ordered moneys, failed to report to CRO and failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse program. At the hearing, the PO testified to trying to contact Legendre and how Legendre had missed meetings with her. In revoking, the court concluded that Legendre’s failure to report rose to the level of “absconding,” which allowed the court to fully revoke his probation. Legendre appealed claiming that he had not absconded.

AFFIRMED. The Court concluded that between his failure to report and his failure to communicate with the PO once she had contacted, the State presented sufficient evidence to prove that Legendre absconded and could be fully revoke.


Banville v. State (CR-15-1384)

The preclusive bar of Rule 32.2(d) does not bar a second Rule 32 petition if the first Rule 32 petition was based only upon Rule 32.1(f) -- a request to file an out-of-time appeal.


Campbell v. State (CR-15-1187)

Stoves v. State (CR-14-1687)

Both of these cases involved a reversal of one conviction on Double Jeopardy grounds (i.e., duplicate offenses), but an affirming of the remaining counts. Both are fact-intensive and not particularly noteworthy.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


homicide tuscaloosa alabama LWOP huntsville alabama bomb threat New York Times implied consent gun rights warrior alabama SCOTUS, midazolam illegal gambling bernard v north dakota 2016 election, adger alabama shooting death Lucky D Arcade drug trafficking, rainbow city alabama robberies attempted murder ake v oklahoma smith v state Sardis Alabama alabama court systems, anniston alabama, morgan county alabama Joshua Reese gun control christian guitierez forced isolation mike gilotti fultondale alabama albertville alabama criminal justice reform, armed robbery self defense pruitt v state boaz alabama fraud limestone county alabama brendan dassey brian fredick lucas towles v state assault hurst v florida Malone v State peyton pruitt alabama criminal law roundup sentencing law and policy blog summaries talladega superspeedway editorial Benn v State illegal gun carry avondale alabama OJ Simpson Samuel Alito drug seizure john earle redfearn IV v state second amendment Walker County Alabama calhoun county alabama morris alabama aiding and abetting habeas corpus relief huntsville Wesley Adam Whitworth aziz sayyed sixth amendment car accident theft murder lethal injection Etowah County Alabama, dekalb county alabama campbell v state Thomas Hardiman Rule 32 heflin alabama sarah koenig hall v florida jerry bohannon US Supreme Court Update home repair fraud animal cruelty brady v maryland blountsville alabama Alabaster alabama Gardendale Alabama criminal mischief Justice Sotomayor drug busts social media fourth amendment hoax destructive devices William Pryor birchfield v north dakota Fentanyl capital murder shooting steve avery asia mcclain mccalla alabama mobile alabama judicial override eric sterling domestic abuse eleventh circuit ruling hanceville alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 church robberies negligent homicide identity theft nathan woods keith v state edwards v arizona brookside alabama narcotics investigation pelham alabama eighth amendment, sexual assault bessemer alabama operation crackdown Stephen Breyer madison alabama Tracie Todd kimberly alabama kenneth eugene billups cherokee county alabama eugene lee jones v state pinson alabama cullman alabama oneonta alabama banville v state Ingmire v State economic growth parole Neil Gorsuch south carolina hurst mandamus brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix Jefferson County Alabama warrantless blood draws breaking and entering capital punishment theft of property death penalty decatur alabama capital offenses Kay Ivey netflix battles v state mulga alabama florence alabama stanley brent chapman ring v arizona Mike Hubbard alabama law enforcement agency birmingham alabama texas blount county alabama nicholas hawkins scotus endangerment of a child sheffield v state mount olive alabama fake kidnapping, prostitution sting Xavier Beasley embezzlement ex parte briseno drug activity alfonso morris debit card skimming scams Donald Trump, Dylann Roof operation bullseye Tommy Arthur criminal justice § 13A-3-23 CCA update utah supreme court public assistance fraud serial beylund v north dakota moving violations drug possession, constitutional violations drug crimes drug smuggling legende v state moore v texas concealed carry npr christmas shooting Adamsville alabama shoplifting Kareem Dacar Gaymon Woods v State homicide rate underage drinking Marengo County Alabama betton v state mountain brook alabama Glaze v State Hillary Clinton, marion county state of arizona abduction benjamin todd acton the mannequin challenge springville alabama abuse adnan syed, unlawful manufacturing crime of passion West Alabama montgomery alabama bailey v us OJ Simpson Made in America heritage christian university § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing constitutional law, stoves v state road rage department of justice court of criminal appeal releases minor offenses kidnapping st clair county alabama tarrant alabama foley alabama Easter felony assaults clarence thomas Eutaw Alabama fraudulent checks terell corey mcmullin utah v strieff baldwin county alabama apprendi v new jersey lethal injection drugs hoover alabama Guy Terrell Junior baltimore city circuit court abandonment Shonda Walker, russell calhoun making a murderer lauderdale county alabama street racing pell city alabama dora alabama court of criminal appeals dothan alabama burglary debtor prison fairfield alabama, trussville alabama gadsden alabama alabama supreme court executions Alonzo Ephraim maryland court of special appeals death penalty, greene county alabama shelby county strickland v washington levins v state ferguson missouri Pleasant Grove Alabama state of alabama fort payne alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church mcwilliams v dunn arson lamar county department of justice, domestic violence



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.