CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeal Releases from March 17, 2017

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, March 27, 2017

 

Keith v. State (CR-15-1319)

Keith pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and first-degree unlawful possession of marijuana after police found drugs under the front seat of his car during an inventory search. Officers pulled Keith over when they ran his license plate and realized the tag didn’t match his car. When they ran Keith’s ID, they discovered he had outstanding warrants and placed him under arrest. His car was searched as an inventory search and the drugs were found inside. Keith moved to suppress on the grounds that the search was improper warrantless search.

REVERSED. The Court concluded that the State failed to show that inventory search was carried out “according to standard criteria and on the basis of something other than suspicion of criminal activity.” The Court focused on Ex parte Boyd, 542 So. 2d 1276 (Ala. 1989), where the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that an inventory search was not valid because there was no evidence that law enforcement carried out the search pursuant to policy. Here, the Court found the same deficiencies that the Boyd court found: conclusory statements regarding following inventory policy, a lack of an inventory list, no copy of the policy was presented, and no evidence the officer followed that policy. Judge Joiner wrote a lengthy dissent.

 

Thoughts: I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Alabama Supreme Court take this issue up and ask for clarification for inventory searches andBoyd’s lasting effect. To me, inventory search precedent focuses on whether officers can show a search really was an administrative search and not a fishing expedition.

 

Sheffield v. State (CR-15-1467)

Sheffield was convicted of murder. He argued that he shot the victim in self-defense or by accident. At trial, the State introduced a recording of a heated phone conversation between the defendant and his wife, which was pretty damning to the defense -- she basically said he murdered the victim and didn’t act in self defense. Sheffield tried to invoke martial privilege to exclude the conversation, but the court allowed its introduction via Rule 804(b)(3) -- statements against interest. The State’s theory was that it was against the spouse’s interest for Sheffield to get convicted of murder.

REVERSED. The Court acknowledged that this was a question of first impression -- whether a declarant’s statements made against her spouse’s penal interest may also be considered against her own pecuniary or proprietary interest. In looking at Oregon case law, the Court concluded that the test as to whether a statement fits within the purview of Rule 804(b)(3) comes down to two central questions: (1) Was the declarant’s primary motive in making the statement to hurt or help her own interest; and (2) Was the risk to the declarant-spouse so great that the statements are inherently reliable? Here, the Court concluded the statements were not against Sheffield’s spouse’s interest (she wanted to divorce him), so they should not have been admitted under Rule 804(b)(3). Moreover, the Court concluded that this error wasn’t harmless given slight evidence presented surrounding the fatal moments.

 

Smith v. State (CR13-0055)

Smith was convicted of two counts of capital murder for a brutal kidnapping-murder/robbery-murder he carried out. At sentencing, the victim’s mother and sister testified that they believed the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for Smith. Smith argued on appeal that this testimony was improper.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED. The Court concluded the victim’s family’s recommendations were improper victim impact statements regarding recommended sentences under Booth v. Maryland. The Court found these statements to be plain error and vacated the death sentence.

Thoughts: I’m not going to be surprised if this gets reversed by the AL SC saying that this error didn’t rise to the level of plain error. I could see the AL SC using Judge Windom’s dissent as a blue print for re-imposing Smith’s death sentence.

 

Legendre v. State (CR-16-0008)

Legendre was on probation and his PO filed a delinquency report alleging that he failed to report, left the state without permission, didn’t pay supervision fees, failed to pay court-ordered moneys, failed to report to CRO and failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse program. At the hearing, the PO testified to trying to contact Legendre and how Legendre had missed meetings with her. In revoking, the court concluded that Legendre’s failure to report rose to the level of “absconding,” which allowed the court to fully revoke his probation. Legendre appealed claiming that he had not absconded.

AFFIRMED. The Court concluded that between his failure to report and his failure to communicate with the PO once she had contacted, the State presented sufficient evidence to prove that Legendre absconded and could be fully revoke.

 

Banville v. State (CR-15-1384)

The preclusive bar of Rule 32.2(d) does not bar a second Rule 32 petition if the first Rule 32 petition was based only upon Rule 32.1(f) -- a request to file an out-of-time appeal.

 

Campbell v. State (CR-15-1187)

Stoves v. State (CR-14-1687)

Both of these cases involved a reversal of one conviction on Double Jeopardy grounds (i.e., duplicate offenses), but an affirming of the remaining counts. Both are fact-intensive and not particularly noteworthy.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

montgomery alabama domestic abuse road rage stoves v state kimberly alabama mccalla alabama home repair fraud Fentanyl foley alabama fourth amendment sheffield v state court of criminal appeal releases negligent homicide lauderdale county alabama steve avery William Pryor death penalty church robberies CCA update decatur alabama south carolina greene county alabama hoover alabama unlawful manufacturing endangerment of a child apprendi v new jersey Guy Terrell Junior court of criminal appeals bessemer alabama stanley brent chapman economic growth Dylann Roof abuse baldwin county alabama Hillary Clinton, moore v texas sentencing law and policy blog summaries banville v state drug smuggling Rule 32 lethal injection animal cruelty towles v state armed robbery marion county alabama law enforcement agency narcotics investigation death penalty, sexual assault pelham alabama department of justice scotus jerry bohannon prostitution sting abandonment ferguson missouri Lucky D Arcade heritage christian university attempted murder theft of property crime of passion shoplifting aziz sayyed Alonzo Ephraim madison alabama minor offenses court systems, Jefferson County Alabama Shonda Walker, homicide rate pell city alabama operation bullseye lamar county Benn v State embezzlement brendan dassey illegal gambling legende v state self defense brady v maryland state of arizona criminal justice reform, drug trafficking, Samuel Alito Eutaw Alabama hanceville alabama public assistance fraud Donald Trump, mike gilotti implied consent huntsville alabama lethal injection drugs huntsville trussville alabama Etowah County Alabama, peyton pruitt cullman alabama npr Neil Gorsuch betton v state john earle redfearn IV v state hurst mandamus pruitt v state birchfield v north dakota cherokee county alabama nicholas hawkins adger alabama keith v state US Supreme Court Update morgan county alabama heflin alabama Joshua Reese West Alabama asia mcclain identity theft making a murderer clarence thomas strickland v washington Marengo County Alabama second amendment drug busts tarrant alabama fraudulent checks anniston alabama, bernard v north dakota judicial override gun control drug possession, constitutional violations nathan woods § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing gun rights calhoun county alabama maryland court of special appeals Wesley Adam Whitworth forced isolation utah v strieff Briarwood Presbyterian Church smith v state moving violations fultondale alabama florence alabama battles v state Pleasant Grove Alabama Ingmire v State hurst v florida § 13A-3-23 adnan syed, habeas corpus relief campbell v state st clair county alabama alabama criminal law roundup capital punishment alabama Thomas Hardiman Sardis Alabama capital offenses brookside alabama SCOTUS, tuscaloosa alabama social media murder Woods v State the mannequin challenge operation crackdown oneonta alabama hoax destructive devices homicide kidnapping robberies birmingham alabama ake v oklahoma abduction mount olive alabama OJ Simpson Made in America street racing brian fredick lucas mcwilliams v dunn pinson alabama criminal mischief blount county alabama eighth amendment, concealed carry criminal justice Malone v State mountain brook alabama theft LWOP ex parte briseno fort payne alabama serial dothan alabama drug seizure illegal gun carry netflix debit card skimming scams eleventh circuit ruling alabama supreme court talladega superspeedway Kareem Dacar Gaymon warrior alabama alfonso morris utah supreme court limestone county alabama russell calhoun drug crimes midazolam hall v florida warrantless blood draws fairfield alabama, burglary Glaze v State baltimore city circuit court shooting kenneth eugene billups blountsville alabama assault gadsden alabama bailey v us bomb threat brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix eric sterling sixth amendment executions morris alabama Justice Sotomayor christmas shooting beylund v north dakota Walker County Alabama car accident benjamin todd acton constitutional law, texas drug activity dora alabama OJ Simpson sarah koenig Alabaster alabama mobile alabama eugene lee jones v state 28 U.S.C. § 2254 levins v state breaking and entering arson New York Times mulga alabama debtor prison edwards v arizona fake kidnapping, Mike Hubbard Kay Ivey editorial Adamsville alabama department of justice, Tracie Todd 2016 election, Gardendale Alabama springville alabama aiding and abetting fraud rainbow city alabama boaz alabama domestic violence dekalb county alabama felony assaults Xavier Beasley capital murder Stephen Breyer Easter ring v arizona terell corey mcmullin state of alabama shelby county parole shooting death albertville alabama christian guitierez avondale alabama Tommy Arthur underage drinking

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.