CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeal Releases from March 17, 2017

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, March 27, 2017


Keith v. State (CR-15-1319)

Keith pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and first-degree unlawful possession of marijuana after police found drugs under the front seat of his car during an inventory search. Officers pulled Keith over when they ran his license plate and realized the tag didn’t match his car. When they ran Keith’s ID, they discovered he had outstanding warrants and placed him under arrest. His car was searched as an inventory search and the drugs were found inside. Keith moved to suppress on the grounds that the search was improper warrantless search.

REVERSED. The Court concluded that the State failed to show that inventory search was carried out “according to standard criteria and on the basis of something other than suspicion of criminal activity.” The Court focused on Ex parte Boyd, 542 So. 2d 1276 (Ala. 1989), where the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that an inventory search was not valid because there was no evidence that law enforcement carried out the search pursuant to policy. Here, the Court found the same deficiencies that the Boyd court found: conclusory statements regarding following inventory policy, a lack of an inventory list, no copy of the policy was presented, and no evidence the officer followed that policy. Judge Joiner wrote a lengthy dissent.


Thoughts: I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Alabama Supreme Court take this issue up and ask for clarification for inventory searches andBoyd’s lasting effect. To me, inventory search precedent focuses on whether officers can show a search really was an administrative search and not a fishing expedition.


Sheffield v. State (CR-15-1467)

Sheffield was convicted of murder. He argued that he shot the victim in self-defense or by accident. At trial, the State introduced a recording of a heated phone conversation between the defendant and his wife, which was pretty damning to the defense -- she basically said he murdered the victim and didn’t act in self defense. Sheffield tried to invoke martial privilege to exclude the conversation, but the court allowed its introduction via Rule 804(b)(3) -- statements against interest. The State’s theory was that it was against the spouse’s interest for Sheffield to get convicted of murder.

REVERSED. The Court acknowledged that this was a question of first impression -- whether a declarant’s statements made against her spouse’s penal interest may also be considered against her own pecuniary or proprietary interest. In looking at Oregon case law, the Court concluded that the test as to whether a statement fits within the purview of Rule 804(b)(3) comes down to two central questions: (1) Was the declarant’s primary motive in making the statement to hurt or help her own interest; and (2) Was the risk to the declarant-spouse so great that the statements are inherently reliable? Here, the Court concluded the statements were not against Sheffield’s spouse’s interest (she wanted to divorce him), so they should not have been admitted under Rule 804(b)(3). Moreover, the Court concluded that this error wasn’t harmless given slight evidence presented surrounding the fatal moments.


Smith v. State (CR13-0055)

Smith was convicted of two counts of capital murder for a brutal kidnapping-murder/robbery-murder he carried out. At sentencing, the victim’s mother and sister testified that they believed the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for Smith. Smith argued on appeal that this testimony was improper.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED. The Court concluded the victim’s family’s recommendations were improper victim impact statements regarding recommended sentences under Booth v. Maryland. The Court found these statements to be plain error and vacated the death sentence.

Thoughts: I’m not going to be surprised if this gets reversed by the AL SC saying that this error didn’t rise to the level of plain error. I could see the AL SC using Judge Windom’s dissent as a blue print for re-imposing Smith’s death sentence.


Legendre v. State (CR-16-0008)

Legendre was on probation and his PO filed a delinquency report alleging that he failed to report, left the state without permission, didn’t pay supervision fees, failed to pay court-ordered moneys, failed to report to CRO and failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse program. At the hearing, the PO testified to trying to contact Legendre and how Legendre had missed meetings with her. In revoking, the court concluded that Legendre’s failure to report rose to the level of “absconding,” which allowed the court to fully revoke his probation. Legendre appealed claiming that he had not absconded.

AFFIRMED. The Court concluded that between his failure to report and his failure to communicate with the PO once she had contacted, the State presented sufficient evidence to prove that Legendre absconded and could be fully revoke.


Banville v. State (CR-15-1384)

The preclusive bar of Rule 32.2(d) does not bar a second Rule 32 petition if the first Rule 32 petition was based only upon Rule 32.1(f) -- a request to file an out-of-time appeal.


Campbell v. State (CR-15-1187)

Stoves v. State (CR-14-1687)

Both of these cases involved a reversal of one conviction on Double Jeopardy grounds (i.e., duplicate offenses), but an affirming of the remaining counts. Both are fact-intensive and not particularly noteworthy.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


christian guitierez embezzlement baltimore city circuit court Rule 32 kimberly alabama Alabaster alabama sentencing law and policy blog summaries crime of passion Pleasant Grove Alabama battles v state second amendment brendan dassey capital offenses gadsden alabama making a murderer debtor prison fraud social media Eutaw Alabama burglary blount county alabama stanley brent chapman russell calhoun moving violations Glaze v State stoves v state pell city alabama domestic abuse brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix mount olive alabama alabama law enforcement agency ferguson missouri Thomas Hardiman implied consent editorial shoplifting legende v state abandonment attempted murder criminal mischief department of justice, texas fake kidnapping, Xavier Beasley brady v maryland campbell v state criminal justice utah supreme court mccalla alabama criminal justice reform, oneonta alabama cherokee county alabama forced isolation gun control Guy Terrell Junior illegal gambling New York Times christmas shooting death penalty Malone v State lamar county south carolina LWOP hall v florida underage drinking Shonda Walker, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Woods v State narcotics investigation nicholas hawkins aiding and abetting fourth amendment betton v state drug busts mcwilliams v dunn warrior alabama self defense minor offenses church robberies moore v texas tarrant alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing homicide negligent homicide greene county alabama dothan alabama rainbow city alabama drug activity felony assaults Gardendale Alabama mobile alabama terell corey mcmullin kenneth eugene billups dora alabama alfonso morris Kareem Dacar Gaymon Marengo County Alabama arson alabama criminal law roundup utah v strieff drug trafficking, domestic violence judicial override heflin alabama sheffield v state shooting death huntsville npr the mannequin challenge breaking and entering William Pryor hurst v florida constitutional violations hanceville alabama death penalty, beylund v north dakota murder theft US Supreme Court Update eleventh circuit ruling mike gilotti eugene lee jones v state bessemer alabama ring v arizona Alonzo Ephraim Tommy Arthur eighth amendment, madison alabama Neil Gorsuch Jefferson County Alabama operation bullseye public assistance fraud warrantless blood draws Mike Hubbard operation crackdown department of justice endangerment of a child sexual assault court systems, road rage banville v state levins v state apprendi v new jersey pelham alabama capital murder clarence thomas smith v state lethal injection drugs constitutional law, huntsville alabama armed robbery trussville alabama CCA update alabama jerry bohannon peyton pruitt maryland court of special appeals aziz sayyed keith v state eric sterling home repair fraud drug smuggling robberies Walker County Alabama homicide rate anniston alabama, birmingham alabama limestone county alabama Sardis Alabama avondale alabama bernard v north dakota foley alabama alabama supreme court ex parte briseno Easter Hillary Clinton, OJ Simpson Made in America fultondale alabama court of criminal appeal releases Kay Ivey blountsville alabama bomb threat john earle redfearn IV v state drug crimes hoover alabama state of arizona Samuel Alito tuscaloosa alabama animal cruelty marion county towles v state Lucky D Arcade Briarwood Presbyterian Church theft of property Etowah County Alabama, strickland v washington Ingmire v State brookside alabama Fentanyl st clair county alabama Joshua Reese identity theft 2016 election, § 13A-3-23 heritage christian university florence alabama drug seizure fraudulent checks calhoun county alabama scotus Stephen Breyer bailey v us debit card skimming scams sarah koenig SCOTUS, albertville alabama Dylann Roof Wesley Adam Whitworth montgomery alabama concealed carry unlawful manufacturing court of criminal appeals abduction sixth amendment springville alabama shooting hurst mandamus OJ Simpson benjamin todd acton serial fort payne alabama midazolam drug possession, decatur alabama street racing pinson alabama hoax destructive devices economic growth adnan syed, adger alabama pruitt v state nathan woods boaz alabama habeas corpus relief asia mcclain executions steve avery car accident parole prostitution sting illegal gun carry West Alabama Adamsville alabama assault netflix mountain brook alabama baldwin county alabama Tracie Todd capital punishment dekalb county alabama talladega superspeedway gun rights cullman alabama mulga alabama lauderdale county alabama birchfield v north dakota brian fredick lucas lethal injection Justice Sotomayor Donald Trump, fairfield alabama, shelby county abuse edwards v arizona morgan county alabama Benn v State ake v oklahoma state of alabama kidnapping morris alabama



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.