CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeal Releases from March 17, 2017

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, March 27, 2017


Keith v. State (CR-15-1319)

Keith pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and first-degree unlawful possession of marijuana after police found drugs under the front seat of his car during an inventory search. Officers pulled Keith over when they ran his license plate and realized the tag didn’t match his car. When they ran Keith’s ID, they discovered he had outstanding warrants and placed him under arrest. His car was searched as an inventory search and the drugs were found inside. Keith moved to suppress on the grounds that the search was improper warrantless search.

REVERSED. The Court concluded that the State failed to show that inventory search was carried out “according to standard criteria and on the basis of something other than suspicion of criminal activity.” The Court focused on Ex parte Boyd, 542 So. 2d 1276 (Ala. 1989), where the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that an inventory search was not valid because there was no evidence that law enforcement carried out the search pursuant to policy. Here, the Court found the same deficiencies that the Boyd court found: conclusory statements regarding following inventory policy, a lack of an inventory list, no copy of the policy was presented, and no evidence the officer followed that policy. Judge Joiner wrote a lengthy dissent.


Thoughts: I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Alabama Supreme Court take this issue up and ask for clarification for inventory searches andBoyd’s lasting effect. To me, inventory search precedent focuses on whether officers can show a search really was an administrative search and not a fishing expedition.


Sheffield v. State (CR-15-1467)

Sheffield was convicted of murder. He argued that he shot the victim in self-defense or by accident. At trial, the State introduced a recording of a heated phone conversation between the defendant and his wife, which was pretty damning to the defense -- she basically said he murdered the victim and didn’t act in self defense. Sheffield tried to invoke martial privilege to exclude the conversation, but the court allowed its introduction via Rule 804(b)(3) -- statements against interest. The State’s theory was that it was against the spouse’s interest for Sheffield to get convicted of murder.

REVERSED. The Court acknowledged that this was a question of first impression -- whether a declarant’s statements made against her spouse’s penal interest may also be considered against her own pecuniary or proprietary interest. In looking at Oregon case law, the Court concluded that the test as to whether a statement fits within the purview of Rule 804(b)(3) comes down to two central questions: (1) Was the declarant’s primary motive in making the statement to hurt or help her own interest; and (2) Was the risk to the declarant-spouse so great that the statements are inherently reliable? Here, the Court concluded the statements were not against Sheffield’s spouse’s interest (she wanted to divorce him), so they should not have been admitted under Rule 804(b)(3). Moreover, the Court concluded that this error wasn’t harmless given slight evidence presented surrounding the fatal moments.


Smith v. State (CR13-0055)

Smith was convicted of two counts of capital murder for a brutal kidnapping-murder/robbery-murder he carried out. At sentencing, the victim’s mother and sister testified that they believed the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for Smith. Smith argued on appeal that this testimony was improper.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED. The Court concluded the victim’s family’s recommendations were improper victim impact statements regarding recommended sentences under Booth v. Maryland. The Court found these statements to be plain error and vacated the death sentence.

Thoughts: I’m not going to be surprised if this gets reversed by the AL SC saying that this error didn’t rise to the level of plain error. I could see the AL SC using Judge Windom’s dissent as a blue print for re-imposing Smith’s death sentence.


Legendre v. State (CR-16-0008)

Legendre was on probation and his PO filed a delinquency report alleging that he failed to report, left the state without permission, didn’t pay supervision fees, failed to pay court-ordered moneys, failed to report to CRO and failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse program. At the hearing, the PO testified to trying to contact Legendre and how Legendre had missed meetings with her. In revoking, the court concluded that Legendre’s failure to report rose to the level of “absconding,” which allowed the court to fully revoke his probation. Legendre appealed claiming that he had not absconded.

AFFIRMED. The Court concluded that between his failure to report and his failure to communicate with the PO once she had contacted, the State presented sufficient evidence to prove that Legendre absconded and could be fully revoke.


Banville v. State (CR-15-1384)

The preclusive bar of Rule 32.2(d) does not bar a second Rule 32 petition if the first Rule 32 petition was based only upon Rule 32.1(f) -- a request to file an out-of-time appeal.


Campbell v. State (CR-15-1187)

Stoves v. State (CR-14-1687)

Both of these cases involved a reversal of one conviction on Double Jeopardy grounds (i.e., duplicate offenses), but an affirming of the remaining counts. Both are fact-intensive and not particularly noteworthy.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


alfonso morris warrior alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon smith v state fraud sheffield v state illegal gambling cullman alabama baltimore city circuit court the mannequin challenge dothan alabama mike gilotti foley alabama steve avery birchfield v north dakota south carolina dekalb county alabama netflix springville alabama boaz alabama maryland court of special appeals hoax destructive devices shooting Mike Hubbard anniston alabama, street racing betton v state § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing avondale alabama ex parte briseno fourth amendment npr Samuel Alito Shonda Walker, lauderdale county alabama state of arizona kidnapping William Pryor Hillary Clinton, alabama law enforcement agency ring v arizona home repair fraud abuse brookside alabama Jefferson County Alabama madison alabama lamar county fort payne alabama Benn v State felony assaults fultondale alabama Dylann Roof social media drug busts Briarwood Presbyterian Church drug smuggling trussville alabama self defense homicide rate shoplifting adnan syed, sixth amendment Neil Gorsuch bomb threat heflin alabama gadsden alabama parole crime of passion kenneth eugene billups huntsville alabama murder Fentanyl eric sterling making a murderer assault executions ake v oklahoma breaking and entering bessemer alabama OJ Simpson theft of property endangerment of a child limestone county alabama albertville alabama blountsville alabama texas identity theft pinson alabama lethal injection drugs heritage christian university mobile alabama animal cruelty brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix decatur alabama pelham alabama forced isolation pell city alabama aziz sayyed adger alabama Gardendale Alabama fraudulent checks marion county arson alabama florence alabama Ingmire v State Thomas Hardiman debtor prison utah supreme court concealed carry state of alabama embezzlement debit card skimming scams burglary mountain brook alabama Guy Terrell Junior moving violations domestic violence pruitt v state road rage constitutional violations brady v maryland minor offenses robberies Woods v State abandonment court of criminal appeal releases Donald Trump, battles v state habeas corpus relief christian guitierez dora alabama rainbow city alabama keith v state Lucky D Arcade peyton pruitt warrantless blood draws russell calhoun operation bullseye editorial Etowah County Alabama, Kay Ivey Sardis Alabama banville v state operation crackdown capital punishment gun rights Xavier Beasley constitutional law, alabama supreme court lethal injection brian fredick lucas Marengo County Alabama fake kidnapping, calhoun county alabama shooting death john earle redfearn IV v state theft armed robbery criminal mischief attempted murder stoves v state SCOTUS, legende v state fairfield alabama, Tommy Arthur Walker County Alabama § 13A-3-23 US Supreme Court Update LWOP abduction court of criminal appeals bailey v us economic growth illegal gun carry beylund v north dakota sexual assault clarence thomas hall v florida ferguson missouri st clair county alabama death penalty eleventh circuit ruling mulga alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth morris alabama car accident judicial override CCA update sentencing law and policy blog summaries Joshua Reese christmas shooting midazolam 28 U.S.C. § 2254 terell corey mcmullin underage drinking criminal justice reform, alabama criminal law roundup shelby county campbell v state asia mcclain talladega superspeedway cherokee county alabama blount county alabama hanceville alabama hoover alabama birmingham alabama negligent homicide morgan county alabama court systems, mount olive alabama mccalla alabama aiding and abetting tarrant alabama Alabaster alabama Easter drug possession, drug crimes Eutaw Alabama scotus brendan dassey baldwin county alabama Tracie Todd Pleasant Grove Alabama eugene lee jones v state bernard v north dakota sarah koenig kimberly alabama second amendment New York Times Adamsville alabama stanley brent chapman hurst v florida edwards v arizona capital murder greene county alabama utah v strieff towles v state eighth amendment, montgomery alabama gun control prostitution sting Malone v State criminal justice drug activity drug seizure OJ Simpson Made in America nathan woods 2016 election, death penalty, narcotics investigation drug trafficking, public assistance fraud jerry bohannon hurst mandamus mcwilliams v dunn nicholas hawkins levins v state tuscaloosa alabama Stephen Breyer implied consent domestic abuse moore v texas Alonzo Ephraim West Alabama unlawful manufacturing Justice Sotomayor department of justice church robberies benjamin todd acton huntsville capital offenses department of justice, strickland v washington oneonta alabama apprendi v new jersey Glaze v State homicide serial Rule 32



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.