CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.


J.D. Lloyd - Friday, May 06, 2016

Eugene Lee Jones v. State (CR-14-1332)


Jones was convicted of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder, stemming from him killing a woman he suspected of setting him up in a robbery. Jones voluntarily talked to investigators on July 29, 2013, in connection to the death, but eventually stopped the questioning when he invoked his right to counsel. Jones was arrested on an outstanding warrant out of Bessemer. Jones was eventually transported back to Lauderdale County on another warrant stemming from a charge unrelated to the homicide. While still in custody, Jones was asked to submit to a polygraph examination. Jones waived his Miranda rights, submitted to the polygraph, and subsequently made another statement in which he admitted that he strangled the victim. Jones moved to suppress this statement under Edwards v. AZ, 451 US 477 (1981) on the grounds that investigators improperly re-initiated contact after he had invoked his right to counsel. The circuit court denied the motion. AFFIRMED. Relying on MD v. Shatzer, 559 US 98 (2010), the CCA affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress on the grounds that “coercive effect” of re-initiation of interrogation wasn’t present in this case like it was in Edwards. Essentially, the Court held that if enough time has passed since the initial invocation of the right to counsel -- more than 14 days -- there is no presumptively problematic re-initiation as there was in Edwards.


Levins v. State (CR-15-0612)


Bell v. State (CR-15-0618)

The appellants in these two cases were two expungement petitioners who were denied relief at the circuit court level and asked the CCA to reverse the denials of their petitions. APPEALS DISMISSED One may only challenge the denial of their expungement petition by petitioning the Alabama Supreme Court for certiorari review of the denial of the petition for expungement.

John Earle Redfearn, IV v. State (CR-14-0500)


This case involved the denial of a motion to suppress drugs evidence recovered from Redfearn’s body. In February 2012, law enforcement obtained a search warrant of Redfearn’s residence based upon 2 controlled buys that occurred at the residence with Redfearn. Law enforcement executed the SW after they observed Redfearn drive away from the house. He was stopped several miles away while the search of the house was going on and taken back to the house by the detaining officers. While executing the warrant, Redfearn’s girlfriend arrived at the house and eventually told the officers that Redfearn keeps drugs on his person. An officer strip-searched Redfearn at the residence and recovered a bottle containing oxycodone pills in his underwear. Redfearn moved to suppress under Bailey v. US, 133 S.Ct. 1031 (2013). AFFIRMED. The CCA explained that while Bailey held that a suspect may be lawfully detained while police are conducting a search warrant only when the person is in the "immediate vicinity" of the place to be searched, Redfearn was properly detained because the police had probable cause to arrest him based upon the controlled buys previously carried out with Redfearn and observed by law enforcement.


Nathaniel Woods (CR-10-0695)

Alfonso Morris (CR-11-1925)

John Russell Calhoun (CR-14-0779)

In these three cases, the CCA affirmed the denial of Rule 32 relief for death-row inmates without holding evidentiary hearings. There’s not much that’s noteworthy in these opinions outside of the observation that the petitions were summarily denied because each petitioner failed to plead sufficient facts that, if proven true, could entitle them to relief. The vast majority of the factual claims in the three petitions were bare-boned factual allegations. In Woods and Morris, petitioners raised claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present certain expert testimony at trial. The CCA affirmed the summary dismissal of these claims because the petitioner failed to identify an expert and what that expert’s testimony would have been at the pleading stage. It bears repeating that if you’re going to raise an IAC claim, in order to be entitled to a hearing, you have to give the circuit court sufficient factual allegations that the court can conclude that your claims could entitle you to relief if proven true. In the context of IAC based on the failure to call certain expert witnesses, you need to make a proffer as to who that expert would have been and what the testimony would have been at the pleading stage.


Brian Fredick Lucas (CR-14-0744)


Lucas was convicted of first-degree attempted sodomy by forcible compulsion and first-degree sexual abuse stemming from an incident in which he allegedly touched his step-daughter on the mouth with his penis while she was sleeping. The CCA reversed his first-degree sodomy conviction on the grounds that the State’s showing did not present evidence of forcible compulsion -- there was no threat by Lucas or evidence that his actions overcame her earnest resistance. The CCA did enter a judgment convicting Lucas of attempted sexual misconduct.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


shoplifting bomb threat Stephen Breyer Marengo County Alabama homicide rate eighth amendment, forced isolation oneonta alabama alabama identity theft apprendi v new jersey morris alabama huntsville alabama brendan dassey sexual assault Briarwood Presbyterian Church kimberly alabama Easter rainbow city alabama murder lethal injection marion county john earle redfearn IV v state social media drug activity court of criminal appeals Wesley Adam Whitworth negligent homicide Lucky D Arcade midazolam hoax destructive devices terell corey mcmullin robberies christian guitierez embezzlement lauderdale county alabama ex parte briseno bessemer alabama narcotics investigation theft of property asia mcclain editorial debit card skimming scams utah supreme court Samuel Alito adger alabama Walker County Alabama Hillary Clinton, illegal gambling fourth amendment battles v state Dylann Roof street racing William Pryor shelby county executions hurst mandamus making a murderer russell calhoun illegal gun carry warrior alabama albertville alabama avondale alabama Kay Ivey steve avery prostitution sting lamar county eleventh circuit ruling § 13A-3-23 criminal justice mcwilliams v dunn maryland court of special appeals operation crackdown shooting foley alabama Guy Terrell Junior drug crimes pinson alabama texas New York Times road rage ake v oklahoma st clair county alabama campbell v state bernard v north dakota heritage christian university Ingmire v State springville alabama shooting death moore v texas brian fredick lucas abuse peyton pruitt florence alabama Jefferson County Alabama Shonda Walker, burglary Pleasant Grove Alabama trussville alabama constitutional law, talladega superspeedway domestic abuse edwards v arizona dothan alabama nathan woods calhoun county alabama greene county alabama morgan county alabama drug trafficking, brady v maryland serial baldwin county alabama court of criminal appeal releases kidnapping animal cruelty cherokee county alabama adnan syed, Kareem Dacar Gaymon betton v state Donald Trump, department of justice fraud sentencing law and policy blog summaries Etowah County Alabama, alfonso morris warrantless blood draws decatur alabama gun rights death penalty, sheffield v state brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix attempted murder concealed carry abduction unlawful manufacturing US Supreme Court Update state of alabama benjamin todd acton strickland v washington limestone county alabama mike gilotti dekalb county alabama implied consent arson beylund v north dakota pelham alabama felony assaults keith v state ring v arizona theft blount county alabama hurst v florida sarah koenig Alonzo Ephraim fraudulent checks domestic violence drug smuggling OJ Simpson Made in America Eutaw Alabama 2016 election, second amendment death penalty hall v florida mulga alabama baltimore city circuit court brookside alabama birchfield v north dakota sixth amendment Thomas Hardiman criminal justice reform, kenneth eugene billups state of arizona Alabaster alabama drug busts nicholas hawkins aziz sayyed mountain brook alabama Rule 32 south carolina christmas shooting capital murder SCOTUS, jerry bohannon fultondale alabama Adamsville alabama Justice Sotomayor 28 U.S.C. § 2254 mccalla alabama Fentanyl public assistance fraud homicide economic growth capital punishment gun control underage drinking moving violations clarence thomas pruitt v state § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing dora alabama hoover alabama drug seizure LWOP constitutional violations Sardis Alabama mount olive alabama church robberies abandonment Benn v State Neil Gorsuch ferguson missouri anniston alabama, Tommy Arthur Malone v State judicial override stoves v state levins v state banville v state madison alabama debtor prison Mike Hubbard gadsden alabama endangerment of a child crime of passion eric sterling fort payne alabama scotus montgomery alabama utah v strieff home repair fraud towles v state Glaze v State cullman alabama CCA update breaking and entering habeas corpus relief Woods v State aiding and abetting eugene lee jones v state legende v state pell city alabama Xavier Beasley lethal injection drugs hanceville alabama car accident mobile alabama npr blountsville alabama criminal mischief Joshua Reese alabama supreme court operation bullseye court systems, drug possession, department of justice, capital offenses tuscaloosa alabama bailey v us heflin alabama OJ Simpson smith v state huntsville boaz alabama self defense Gardendale Alabama birmingham alabama the mannequin challenge armed robbery parole fairfield alabama, minor offenses tarrant alabama fake kidnapping, West Alabama assault alabama criminal law roundup netflix Tracie Todd alabama law enforcement agency stanley brent chapman



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.