CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.


J.D. Lloyd - Friday, May 06, 2016

Eugene Lee Jones v. State (CR-14-1332)


Jones was convicted of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder, stemming from him killing a woman he suspected of setting him up in a robbery. Jones voluntarily talked to investigators on July 29, 2013, in connection to the death, but eventually stopped the questioning when he invoked his right to counsel. Jones was arrested on an outstanding warrant out of Bessemer. Jones was eventually transported back to Lauderdale County on another warrant stemming from a charge unrelated to the homicide. While still in custody, Jones was asked to submit to a polygraph examination. Jones waived his Miranda rights, submitted to the polygraph, and subsequently made another statement in which he admitted that he strangled the victim. Jones moved to suppress this statement under Edwards v. AZ, 451 US 477 (1981) on the grounds that investigators improperly re-initiated contact after he had invoked his right to counsel. The circuit court denied the motion. AFFIRMED. Relying on MD v. Shatzer, 559 US 98 (2010), the CCA affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress on the grounds that “coercive effect” of re-initiation of interrogation wasn’t present in this case like it was in Edwards. Essentially, the Court held that if enough time has passed since the initial invocation of the right to counsel -- more than 14 days -- there is no presumptively problematic re-initiation as there was in Edwards.


Levins v. State (CR-15-0612)


Bell v. State (CR-15-0618)

The appellants in these two cases were two expungement petitioners who were denied relief at the circuit court level and asked the CCA to reverse the denials of their petitions. APPEALS DISMISSED One may only challenge the denial of their expungement petition by petitioning the Alabama Supreme Court for certiorari review of the denial of the petition for expungement.

John Earle Redfearn, IV v. State (CR-14-0500)


This case involved the denial of a motion to suppress drugs evidence recovered from Redfearn’s body. In February 2012, law enforcement obtained a search warrant of Redfearn’s residence based upon 2 controlled buys that occurred at the residence with Redfearn. Law enforcement executed the SW after they observed Redfearn drive away from the house. He was stopped several miles away while the search of the house was going on and taken back to the house by the detaining officers. While executing the warrant, Redfearn’s girlfriend arrived at the house and eventually told the officers that Redfearn keeps drugs on his person. An officer strip-searched Redfearn at the residence and recovered a bottle containing oxycodone pills in his underwear. Redfearn moved to suppress under Bailey v. US, 133 S.Ct. 1031 (2013). AFFIRMED. The CCA explained that while Bailey held that a suspect may be lawfully detained while police are conducting a search warrant only when the person is in the "immediate vicinity" of the place to be searched, Redfearn was properly detained because the police had probable cause to arrest him based upon the controlled buys previously carried out with Redfearn and observed by law enforcement.


Nathaniel Woods (CR-10-0695)

Alfonso Morris (CR-11-1925)

John Russell Calhoun (CR-14-0779)

In these three cases, the CCA affirmed the denial of Rule 32 relief for death-row inmates without holding evidentiary hearings. There’s not much that’s noteworthy in these opinions outside of the observation that the petitions were summarily denied because each petitioner failed to plead sufficient facts that, if proven true, could entitle them to relief. The vast majority of the factual claims in the three petitions were bare-boned factual allegations. In Woods and Morris, petitioners raised claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present certain expert testimony at trial. The CCA affirmed the summary dismissal of these claims because the petitioner failed to identify an expert and what that expert’s testimony would have been at the pleading stage. It bears repeating that if you’re going to raise an IAC claim, in order to be entitled to a hearing, you have to give the circuit court sufficient factual allegations that the court can conclude that your claims could entitle you to relief if proven true. In the context of IAC based on the failure to call certain expert witnesses, you need to make a proffer as to who that expert would have been and what the testimony would have been at the pleading stage.


Brian Fredick Lucas (CR-14-0744)


Lucas was convicted of first-degree attempted sodomy by forcible compulsion and first-degree sexual abuse stemming from an incident in which he allegedly touched his step-daughter on the mouth with his penis while she was sleeping. The CCA reversed his first-degree sodomy conviction on the grounds that the State’s showing did not present evidence of forcible compulsion -- there was no threat by Lucas or evidence that his actions overcame her earnest resistance. The CCA did enter a judgment convicting Lucas of attempted sexual misconduct.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


russell calhoun tarrant alabama debtor prison theft of property eugene lee jones v state Walker County Alabama nicholas hawkins hall v florida constitutional violations assault lethal injection drugs Justice Sotomayor making a murderer animal cruelty clarence thomas moving violations 2016 election, shooting implied consent armed robbery capital punishment Hillary Clinton, operation bullseye Rule 32 executions south carolina adger alabama florence alabama department of justice, embezzlement shooting death street racing aziz sayyed pelham alabama domestic abuse habeas corpus relief fraud texas operation crackdown alabama law enforcement agency steve avery judicial override bernard v north dakota drug busts church robberies beylund v north dakota Fentanyl scotus illegal gun carry alabama second amendment West Alabama levins v state edwards v arizona illegal gambling boaz alabama court of criminal appeal releases SCOTUS, heritage christian university death penalty morris alabama strickland v washington birchfield v north dakota lethal injection alfonso morris cullman alabama crime of passion moore v texas hoax destructive devices trussville alabama utah v strieff brookside alabama st clair county alabama capital offenses domestic violence mount olive alabama apprendi v new jersey department of justice Kareem Dacar Gaymon fairfield alabama, bailey v us smith v state Shonda Walker, narcotics investigation calhoun county alabama self defense burglary OJ Simpson Made in America peyton pruitt Wesley Adam Whitworth criminal justice mccalla alabama Woods v State 28 U.S.C. § 2254 talladega superspeedway shelby county nathan woods sheffield v state CCA update shoplifting Sardis Alabama homicide netflix Stephen Breyer aiding and abetting christian guitierez Guy Terrell Junior felony assaults pell city alabama Dylann Roof albertville alabama avondale alabama home repair fraud eric sterling limestone county alabama sexual assault warrior alabama Gardendale Alabama hurst v florida attempted murder banville v state Kay Ivey stoves v state § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing Benn v State mulga alabama fraudulent checks Malone v State Briarwood Presbyterian Church battles v state the mannequin challenge sarah koenig midazolam springville alabama terell corey mcmullin drug possession, breaking and entering economic growth William Pryor bomb threat drug seizure ake v oklahoma social media stanley brent chapman editorial gun control birmingham alabama OJ Simpson Thomas Hardiman Easter tuscaloosa alabama benjamin todd acton Neil Gorsuch dora alabama blount county alabama Mike Hubbard sixth amendment brady v maryland forced isolation Pleasant Grove Alabama minor offenses negligent homicide marion county Jefferson County Alabama kenneth eugene billups Tracie Todd npr drug smuggling Etowah County Alabama, Lucky D Arcade public assistance fraud arson mobile alabama cherokee county alabama towles v state greene county alabama Marengo County Alabama asia mcclain sentencing law and policy blog summaries robberies constitutional law, huntsville alabama car accident Tommy Arthur court systems, legende v state Donald Trump, foley alabama parole US Supreme Court Update madison alabama § 13A-3-23 alabama supreme court murder christmas shooting hurst mandamus identity theft keith v state homicide rate maryland court of special appeals pinson alabama rainbow city alabama mountain brook alabama utah supreme court oneonta alabama New York Times alabama criminal law roundup eleventh circuit ruling kidnapping abuse fort payne alabama LWOP Joshua Reese theft brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix brian fredick lucas fake kidnapping, mcwilliams v dunn hoover alabama morgan county alabama unlawful manufacturing brendan dassey john earle redfearn IV v state montgomery alabama Samuel Alito drug crimes ring v arizona heflin alabama criminal mischief anniston alabama, dekalb county alabama Alabaster alabama baltimore city circuit court fourth amendment betton v state ex parte briseno pruitt v state mike gilotti blountsville alabama jerry bohannon state of alabama dothan alabama campbell v state ferguson missouri huntsville underage drinking gadsden alabama adnan syed, Xavier Beasley endangerment of a child death penalty, drug activity kimberly alabama gun rights Adamsville alabama warrantless blood draws concealed carry Glaze v State Eutaw Alabama debit card skimming scams court of criminal appeals criminal justice reform, lauderdale county alabama fultondale alabama lamar county bessemer alabama prostitution sting road rage Alonzo Ephraim serial capital murder eighth amendment, state of arizona Ingmire v State decatur alabama drug trafficking, abduction abandonment baldwin county alabama hanceville alabama



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.