CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Alabama Death-Row Inmates Ask for SCOTUS Review

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, January 06, 2017

Today, the US Supreme Court is considering three cert petitions involving important questions challenging the Alabama capital sentencing scheme. Two challenges involve the Supreme Court’s 2016 ruling in Hurst v. Florida, which held that any fact necessary to expose a defendant to the death penalty must be found by a jury, not a judge.

 

Two cert petitions involve Tommy Arthur, a man who’s been on Alabama’s death row for 30 years. One petition is a Hurst-based challenge. In that petition, Arthur (1) makes a general challenge to Alabama’s scheme under Hurst; (2) argues Hurst requires a unanimous jury vote for death (his vote for death was 11-1); and (3) claims Hurst applies retroactively.

 

Arthur’s second petition raises Eighth Amendment claims against Alabama’s execution protocol.

 

The Court is also considering a cert petition from Jerry Bohannon. While I do not have a copy of Bohannon’s cert petition, I would imagine he is raising claims similar to those he presented to the Alabama Supreme Court in his case that was decided in September 2016. There, the Court rejected a number of Hurst claims, most notably Bohannon’s challenge that Hurst requires a jury to decide the weight of aggravating factors against mitigating factors.

 

In Alabama, a judge makes the final sentencing determination and must decide that the aggravating factors of a case outweigh the mitigating factors in order to sentence a defendant to death. Under Alabama law (which is grounded in pre-Aprendi/Ring SCOTUS decisions), the weighing of aggravators versus mitigators is purely a job for the judge, not the jury. A fairly clear and long line of cases has held that the Sixth Amendment does not require a jury to conduct this weighing. Hurst calls this thinking into question.

 

I’m bearish on either case’s chance. I think Arthur has a better shot on the Eighth Amendment issue than the Sixth Amendment issue, but I don’t think he’d have the votes to do anything. Bohannon’s weighing claim is somewhat blunted by the fact that the jury recommended death by a vote of 11-1, so whatever error he claims might be harmless. Moreover, I don’t believe he raised a claim that Hurst requires juror unanimity, which probably would have helped. The Court should wait on a better vehicle – an override case - to take that issue up.

 

However, should the Court take up Bohannon’s case on the weighing issue, I think there’s a good chance the Court would rule in Bohannon’s favor and hold that the Sixth Amendment requires a jury to determine the weight of aggravators versus mitigators. I think the votes are there. Ginsburg authored Ring, Sotomayor wrote a scathing dissent in the denial of cert in Woodward v. AL, a case that challenged override in the pre-Hurst era, Breyer believes the Eighth Amendment requires a jury to find everything (even if he doesn’t like Ring) and joined Sotomayor’s dissent in Woodward, and Kagan, Kennedy, Thomas and Roberts were in the majority in Hurst.

 

Even if the Court doesn’t take up one of these two cases, I believe the writing is on the wall that the Court will be forced to take a closer look at Alabama’s capital sentencing scheme either this term or next.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

unlawful manufacturing lamar county mount olive alabama US Supreme Court Update hoover alabama brady v maryland prostitution sting robberies theft of property alabama criminal law roundup utah supreme court serial SCOTUS, kidnapping New York Times armed robbery heritage christian university birchfield v north dakota road rage abandonment Kay Ivey illegal gambling embezzlement LWOP Sardis Alabama beylund v north dakota illegal gun carry fort payne alabama smith v state stoves v state domestic abuse debit card skimming scams huntsville warrior alabama criminal justice dora alabama Eutaw Alabama levins v state blount county alabama Woods v State oneonta alabama alabama supreme court alabama law enforcement agency bernard v north dakota sarah koenig brookside alabama Dylann Roof alfonso morris shoplifting Gardendale Alabama forced isolation foley alabama hurst mandamus Ingmire v State Kareem Dacar Gaymon constitutional law, Shonda Walker, car accident hanceville alabama CCA update Walker County Alabama mulga alabama greene county alabama editorial ex parte briseno baldwin county alabama asia mcclain arson nicholas hawkins § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing bailey v us sheffield v state christmas shooting aiding and abetting economic growth concealed carry § 13A-3-23 murder making a murderer drug smuggling Tracie Todd birmingham alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth Pleasant Grove Alabama Thomas Hardiman burglary Donald Trump, stanley brent chapman mcwilliams v dunn underage drinking maryland court of special appeals drug activity second amendment limestone county alabama court of criminal appeals Benn v State lauderdale county alabama capital murder montgomery alabama Joshua Reese marion county tarrant alabama fake kidnapping, apprendi v new jersey aziz sayyed brian fredick lucas shooting eugene lee jones v state identity theft huntsville alabama scotus anniston alabama, lethal injection minor offenses sixth amendment clarence thomas fourth amendment trussville alabama morris alabama pruitt v state parole homicide department of justice, pell city alabama avondale alabama blountsville alabama judicial override adnan syed, capital punishment fairfield alabama, sexual assault implied consent attempted murder gun rights utah v strieff pelham alabama towles v state fraud steve avery cullman alabama jerry bohannon theft kimberly alabama st clair county alabama home repair fraud Alabaster alabama Rule 32 rainbow city alabama battles v state campbell v state npr criminal justice reform, drug trafficking, strickland v washington West Alabama animal cruelty narcotics investigation eleventh circuit ruling court systems, Easter fraudulent checks florence alabama eighth amendment, OJ Simpson Made in America hurst v florida Glaze v State Stephen Breyer drug crimes sentencing law and policy blog summaries morgan county alabama operation bullseye nathan woods assault south carolina gadsden alabama eric sterling negligent homicide terell corey mcmullin capital offenses banville v state Alonzo Ephraim dekalb county alabama benjamin todd acton Malone v State gun control bessemer alabama mobile alabama public assistance fraud hall v florida legende v state mccalla alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix hoax destructive devices calhoun county alabama state of alabama springville alabama shooting death William Pryor Mike Hubbard heflin alabama debtor prison dothan alabama operation crackdown felony assaults self defense moving violations Samuel Alito department of justice fultondale alabama shelby county endangerment of a child drug seizure domestic violence madison alabama Tommy Arthur edwards v arizona texas street racing adger alabama drug possession, Neil Gorsuch christian guitierez pinson alabama Marengo County Alabama alabama death penalty Adamsville alabama baltimore city circuit court 28 U.S.C. § 2254 kenneth eugene billups mountain brook alabama Hillary Clinton, criminal mischief lethal injection drugs betton v state Etowah County Alabama, Jefferson County Alabama drug busts ake v oklahoma Guy Terrell Junior abuse executions cherokee county alabama tuscaloosa alabama midazolam Lucky D Arcade mike gilotti breaking and entering constitutional violations OJ Simpson crime of passion peyton pruitt Briarwood Presbyterian Church brendan dassey homicide rate abduction decatur alabama bomb threat Justice Sotomayor keith v state boaz alabama john earle redfearn IV v state social media death penalty, warrantless blood draws the mannequin challenge Fentanyl church robberies ring v arizona netflix moore v texas russell calhoun Xavier Beasley 2016 election, ferguson missouri state of arizona albertville alabama talladega superspeedway habeas corpus relief court of criminal appeal releases

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.