CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Supreme Court Update - New Protections Against Executing The Mentally Disabled

J.D. Lloyd - Thursday, March 30, 2017


Moore v. Texas (U.S. Supreme Court, March 28/2017)


Moore was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death. In post-trial proceedings, a circuit court concluded that Mr. Moore was intellectually disabled and, thus, ineligible for execution under Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) and Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. ___ (2014). The circuit court based its decision on the most current medical guidelines. However, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (“CCA”) rejected that conclusion and re-instated Moore’s death sentence. The CCA concluded that the circuit court erred in not following factors laid out in Ex parte Briseno, 135 S. W. 3d 1( 2004), which relied upon medical authority from 1992. Moore appealed, claiming the CCA’s reasoning violated the Eighth Amendment.



In Atkins, the Supreme Court opened the door to allow states to develop their own tests for determining intellectual disability and ineligibility for the death penalty. However, as the states have developed different tests, the Court has indicated it will review these procedures to determine whether the states have created “an unacceptable risk that persons with intellectual disability will be executed.” Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. at ___. Here, the Court took aim at Texas’ Atkins test for determining intellectual disability which was centered around out-dated medical information and court-created “factors” that have been widely criticized.


In holding that Mr. Moore was ineligible for the death penalty under Atkins, the circuit court relied on medical diagnostic standards coming from the 11th edition of the American Association on Intellectual and Development Disabilities (“AAIDD”) clinical manual and the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (“DSM-5”) published by the American Psychiatric Association. The court followed the “generally accepted, uncontroversial intellectual-disability diagnostic definitions” in reaching their conclusion. Basically, the circuit court relied on the most up-to-date diagnostic material in assessing Moore.


The CCA rejected the circuit court’s conclusion and chastised it for not applying the Briseno test for determining intellectual disability. The Briseno test was based upon the 9th edition of the AAIDD and included a seven-factor test that was not grounded in any medical authority -- just a judicial creation. The CCA recognized that the standards in the AAIDD may have changed, but concluded that the Briseno test “remained adequately informed by the medical community’s diagnostic framework.”


The Supreme Court concluded that the CCA’s reliance on out-dated medical information and “factors” that have been widely criticized and rejected in the legal and medical community could not comport with the Eighth Amendment as well as Atkins and Hall. While the State’s have leeway in formulating their own approach to addressing Atkins claims, the cornerstone of any scheme must be “the medical community’s diagnostic framework.”



Read the decision here



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


parole blountsville alabama arson avondale alabama debtor prison Wesley Adam Whitworth utah supreme court madison alabama habeas corpus relief huntsville drug trafficking, Alabaster alabama Glaze v State lethal injection drugs 2016 election, betton v state foley alabama albertville alabama bomb threat battles v state abandonment nathan woods marion county Kareem Dacar Gaymon illegal gun carry bessemer alabama baltimore city circuit court court of criminal appeals Easter Lucky D Arcade hurst v florida apprendi v new jersey alabama oneonta alabama alabama criminal law roundup morgan county alabama theft of property OJ Simpson morris alabama sentencing law and policy blog summaries Etowah County Alabama, debit card skimming scams russell calhoun warrantless blood draws brian fredick lucas SCOTUS, Rule 32 utah v strieff hall v florida baldwin county alabama Fentanyl New York Times birchfield v north dakota npr drug crimes court of criminal appeal releases Gardendale Alabama endangerment of a child death penalty, drug seizure benjamin todd acton making a murderer shelby county criminal mischief warrior alabama forced isolation steve avery edwards v arizona mccalla alabama anniston alabama, second amendment shooting smith v state south carolina maryland court of special appeals US Supreme Court Update animal cruelty § 13A-3-23 state of arizona capital offenses Stephen Breyer § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing nicholas hawkins birmingham alabama terell corey mcmullin adger alabama public assistance fraud alabama law enforcement agency campbell v state limestone county alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama capital punishment car accident asia mcclain brookside alabama homicide Tracie Todd brady v maryland department of justice drug smuggling kenneth eugene billups Guy Terrell Junior hurst mandamus burglary unlawful manufacturing OJ Simpson Made in America fultondale alabama Adamsville alabama self defense lamar county criminal justice hoover alabama negligent homicide fraudulent checks operation crackdown stanley brent chapman christmas shooting dekalb county alabama Hillary Clinton, strickland v washington st clair county alabama pelham alabama midazolam hanceville alabama cherokee county alabama constitutional law, montgomery alabama Walker County Alabama Dylann Roof drug busts Mike Hubbard eighth amendment, department of justice, banville v state alfonso morris home repair fraud clarence thomas breaking and entering identity theft eric sterling prostitution sting beylund v north dakota jerry bohannon kimberly alabama domestic violence gun control greene county alabama Shonda Walker, economic growth sarah koenig shooting death brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix church robberies aziz sayyed LWOP mike gilotti constitutional violations bailey v us embezzlement fairfield alabama, ex parte briseno scotus abuse state of alabama fort payne alabama bernard v north dakota blount county alabama sixth amendment moore v texas felony assaults fourth amendment Donald Trump, mountain brook alabama ring v arizona Xavier Beasley christian guitierez assault tarrant alabama Malone v State judicial override abduction drug activity keith v state alabama supreme court Tommy Arthur calhoun county alabama Joshua Reese underage drinking ake v oklahoma street racing kidnapping trussville alabama attempted murder brendan dassey Briarwood Presbyterian Church springville alabama fraud fake kidnapping, drug possession, rainbow city alabama adnan syed, homicide rate armed robbery eleventh circuit ruling sheffield v state lethal injection mount olive alabama cullman alabama theft minor offenses Sardis Alabama huntsville alabama florence alabama heritage christian university Justice Sotomayor dora alabama stoves v state Eutaw Alabama social media netflix Samuel Alito operation bullseye mcwilliams v dunn executions ferguson missouri hoax destructive devices decatur alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 texas peyton pruitt moving violations court systems, West Alabama Ingmire v State implied consent boaz alabama john earle redfearn IV v state capital murder tuscaloosa alabama gadsden alabama lauderdale county alabama aiding and abetting Marengo County Alabama illegal gambling robberies eugene lee jones v state pruitt v state pinson alabama concealed carry shoplifting Benn v State talladega superspeedway pell city alabama gun rights serial Alonzo Ephraim narcotics investigation the mannequin challenge mulga alabama death penalty legende v state Thomas Hardiman crime of passion editorial William Pryor Neil Gorsuch road rage Jefferson County Alabama sexual assault dothan alabama Kay Ivey heflin alabama murder levins v state Woods v State towles v state CCA update mobile alabama domestic abuse criminal justice reform,



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.