CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Supreme Court Update - New Protections Against Executing The Mentally Disabled

J.D. Lloyd - Thursday, March 30, 2017


Moore v. Texas (U.S. Supreme Court, March 28/2017)


Moore was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death. In post-trial proceedings, a circuit court concluded that Mr. Moore was intellectually disabled and, thus, ineligible for execution under Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) and Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. ___ (2014). The circuit court based its decision on the most current medical guidelines. However, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (“CCA”) rejected that conclusion and re-instated Moore’s death sentence. The CCA concluded that the circuit court erred in not following factors laid out in Ex parte Briseno, 135 S. W. 3d 1( 2004), which relied upon medical authority from 1992. Moore appealed, claiming the CCA’s reasoning violated the Eighth Amendment.



In Atkins, the Supreme Court opened the door to allow states to develop their own tests for determining intellectual disability and ineligibility for the death penalty. However, as the states have developed different tests, the Court has indicated it will review these procedures to determine whether the states have created “an unacceptable risk that persons with intellectual disability will be executed.” Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. at ___. Here, the Court took aim at Texas’ Atkins test for determining intellectual disability which was centered around out-dated medical information and court-created “factors” that have been widely criticized.


In holding that Mr. Moore was ineligible for the death penalty under Atkins, the circuit court relied on medical diagnostic standards coming from the 11th edition of the American Association on Intellectual and Development Disabilities (“AAIDD”) clinical manual and the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (“DSM-5”) published by the American Psychiatric Association. The court followed the “generally accepted, uncontroversial intellectual-disability diagnostic definitions” in reaching their conclusion. Basically, the circuit court relied on the most up-to-date diagnostic material in assessing Moore.


The CCA rejected the circuit court’s conclusion and chastised it for not applying the Briseno test for determining intellectual disability. The Briseno test was based upon the 9th edition of the AAIDD and included a seven-factor test that was not grounded in any medical authority -- just a judicial creation. The CCA recognized that the standards in the AAIDD may have changed, but concluded that the Briseno test “remained adequately informed by the medical community’s diagnostic framework.”


The Supreme Court concluded that the CCA’s reliance on out-dated medical information and “factors” that have been widely criticized and rejected in the legal and medical community could not comport with the Eighth Amendment as well as Atkins and Hall. While the State’s have leeway in formulating their own approach to addressing Atkins claims, the cornerstone of any scheme must be “the medical community’s diagnostic framework.”



Read the decision here



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


dora alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama Glaze v State Guy Terrell Junior pell city alabama Neil Gorsuch smith v state levins v state debtor prison narcotics investigation oneonta alabama car accident drug busts Briarwood Presbyterian Church making a murderer Samuel Alito benjamin todd acton Etowah County Alabama, department of justice, negligent homicide Joshua Reese breaking and entering stanley brent chapman alabama law enforcement agency rainbow city alabama legende v state alfonso morris brady v maryland Walker County Alabama fourth amendment Tracie Todd clarence thomas Lucky D Arcade mount olive alabama utah supreme court mulga alabama editorial lauderdale county alabama 2016 election, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 pinson alabama Jefferson County Alabama kidnapping dekalb county alabama hurst v florida towles v state mcwilliams v dunn court of criminal appeals ex parte briseno death penalty state of alabama hoax destructive devices Woods v State state of arizona Fentanyl st clair county alabama sarah koenig scotus marion county netflix domestic abuse bessemer alabama capital offenses endangerment of a child baltimore city circuit court john earle redfearn IV v state hanceville alabama social media brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix adnan syed, peyton pruitt judicial override Hillary Clinton, lamar county bailey v us department of justice capital murder florence alabama pelham alabama fake kidnapping, huntsville alabama calhoun county alabama debit card skimming scams identity theft midazolam Ingmire v State LWOP theft eric sterling crime of passion steve avery § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing shooting death habeas corpus relief shooting beylund v north dakota homicide warrior alabama drug seizure nathan woods avondale alabama prostitution sting capital punishment asia mcclain executions shelby county Stephen Breyer birmingham alabama campbell v state Marengo County Alabama decatur alabama kimberly alabama animal cruelty alabama supreme court hoover alabama assault operation bullseye Alonzo Ephraim gun control Dylann Roof blountsville alabama Eutaw Alabama boaz alabama constitutional law, fairfield alabama, pruitt v state fultondale alabama US Supreme Court Update strickland v washington heflin alabama npr Benn v State eugene lee jones v state death penalty, abandonment nicholas hawkins sheffield v state morris alabama second amendment blount county alabama Sardis Alabama Alabaster alabama morgan county alabama birchfield v north dakota Mike Hubbard warrantless blood draws apprendi v new jersey Shonda Walker, implied consent maryland court of special appeals unlawful manufacturing economic growth § 13A-3-23 SCOTUS, Kay Ivey huntsville gun rights madison alabama brian fredick lucas mccalla alabama cherokee county alabama gadsden alabama drug possession, south carolina adger alabama montgomery alabama public assistance fraud attempted murder edwards v arizona sentencing law and policy blog summaries home repair fraud cullman alabama jerry bohannon Easter street racing ring v arizona shoplifting burglary illegal gambling church robberies limestone county alabama Rule 32 robberies christian guitierez criminal justice constitutional violations tarrant alabama road rage parole homicide rate Donald Trump, embezzlement trussville alabama aiding and abetting eleventh circuit ruling underage drinking Tommy Arthur New York Times terell corey mcmullin heritage christian university texas drug crimes fraud Thomas Hardiman forced isolation serial springville alabama the mannequin challenge tuscaloosa alabama baldwin county alabama Gardendale Alabama lethal injection hall v florida Malone v State William Pryor albertville alabama operation crackdown arson Xavier Beasley ake v oklahoma kenneth eugene billups sexual assault drug smuggling betton v state alabama criminal law roundup illegal gun carry brendan dassey fraudulent checks hurst mandamus alabama anniston alabama, criminal justice reform, fort payne alabama bomb threat concealed carry West Alabama lethal injection drugs armed robbery mountain brook alabama stoves v state criminal mischief court systems, christmas shooting self defense drug activity minor offenses CCA update moore v texas Justice Sotomayor Adamsville alabama russell calhoun sixth amendment talladega superspeedway felony assaults eighth amendment, bernard v north dakota court of criminal appeal releases theft of property mike gilotti murder Wesley Adam Whitworth mobile alabama battles v state abuse aziz sayyed OJ Simpson utah v strieff abduction OJ Simpson Made in America moving violations banville v state ferguson missouri keith v state Kareem Dacar Gaymon brookside alabama greene county alabama domestic violence dothan alabama foley alabama drug trafficking,



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.