CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

High Court Reverses Another Alabama Death Sentence

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, June 19, 2017

McWilliams v. Dunn, Comm’r ALDOC


Question Presented: Did Alabama courts wrongfully conclude McWilliams was not denied meaningful assistance from a mental-health expert under Ake v. Oklahoma?




McWilliams was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death for a 1994 robbery/rape/murder that took place in a convenience store in Tuscaloosa. McWilliams’ mental health was explored in depth during the course of his trial. He was examined by a “Lunacy Commission” composed of three doctors at Taylor Hardin Secure Medical Facility. After he was convicted and after the jury recommended he be sentenced to death by a vote of 10-2, McWilliams asked for neurological and neuropsychological exams. The court order a Dr. John Goff, a neuropsychologist with the State, to examine McWilliams. However, Dr. Goff’s findings were not based on a complete review of his mental health records. His report was given to McWilliams only 48 hours before the judicial sentencing phase. On the eve of the judicial sentencing hearing, Taylor Hardin and Holman Prison sent defense counsel updated records which had been subpoenaed months before. Trial counsel continuously asked the trial court for an independent expert and a continuance, but these requests were rejected.


Eventually, McWilliams case arrived in federal court when he filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief. Among other issues, McWilliams argued that the State deprived him of Due Process under Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 (1985). McWilliams argued this denial was a violation of “clearly established federal law” and thus entitled him to habeas corpus relief. The district court denied the request.


Ake v. Oklahoma

In Ake, the Court ruled that the Constitution requires the State to provide an indigent defendant with “assistance necessary to prepare an effective defense based on his mental condition” if the defendant’s sanity is in question. The ruling was framed around the concept of the “meaningful access to justice.” The expert should “assist in evaluation, preparation, and presentation of the defense.”


Eleventh Circuit Ruling

The Eleventh Circuit denied relief. Initially, the Court concluded that McWilliams failed to meet his burden of showing that “clearly established federal law” entitled him to an independent expert. The Eleventh Circuit noted a split in the circuits regarding whether Ake requires the appointment of an independent expert and that the Supreme Court had never resolved that split. Because the split existed, there was, in the Court’s opinion, no clearly established federal law that could entitled McWilliams relief on this claim. Additionally, the court concluded that the State courts’ determination that Ake had been satisfied was likewise not an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law.


Judge Wilson’s dissent

Judge Wilson believed that Ake was not satisfied here. First, the State failed to provide meaningful psychological assistance. McWilliams did not receive any expert assistance until after the sentencing hearing held before the jury. Second, the assistance McWilliams received from Dr. Goff was based on an incomplete review of the mental health records available for consideration. In Judge Wilson’s opinion, this paltry showing did not satisfy Ake and warrants habeas corpus relief.


Supreme Court Ruling

The Court ruled that in the particular circumstances of this case, McWilliams’ rights under Ake were not protected. The Court declined to answer the more specific question of whether Ake requires appointment of a mental health expert who is independent of the prosecution because Alabama failed to satisfy “Ake’s most basic requirements.”


The Court rejected Alabama’s argument that it complied with Ake by allowing Dr. Goff to examine McWilliams. Ake requires more: “[1] examination and assist in [2] evaluation, [3] preparation, and [4] presentation of the defense.” The Court concluded that even if it were to assume the State satisfied the “examination” requirement, it completely failed to satisfy the last three prongs.


While the 11th Circuit had ruled that whatever error McWilliams suffered was “harmless,” the Supreme Court noted that ruling was limited to just the question of whether the requested continuance would have made a difference in McWilliams sentencing. The Court pointed out that on remand the 11th Circuit should consider how the State’s failure to guarantee the remaining three prongs of Ake would have made a difference in McWilliams’ case.


Dissent (Alito, Roberts, Thomas, Gorsuch)

The dissent would have had the Court address the narrow question of whether it is clearly established federal law that Ake requires the appointment of an independent mental health expert. The dissent complains that Alabama didn’t have a chance to address the question the Court actually addressed. However, this simply isn’t true. Alabama briefed the merits of the underlying Ake claim at the merits stage.


The 11th Circuit on Remand

The Eleventh Circuit is likely to kick the case back down to the district court to address the full Ake question. It’s hard to see McWilliams’ death sentence standing when the Supreme Court has all but said 3 aspects of Ake weren’t satisfied here.


If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


domestic violence fairfield alabama, smith v state Rule 32 habeas corpus relief brookside alabama nathan woods forced isolation limestone county alabama avondale alabama south carolina Justice Sotomayor Joshua Reese christmas shooting bessemer alabama midazolam US Supreme Court Update church robberies betton v state operation bullseye Mike Hubbard embezzlement nicholas hawkins npr street racing fraud public assistance fraud robberies apprendi v new jersey armed robbery debit card skimming scams drug smuggling bomb threat endangerment of a child Hillary Clinton, alfonso morris clarence thomas Gardendale Alabama negligent homicide banville v state pelham alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 lamar county Marengo County Alabama sixth amendment bailey v us § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing boaz alabama ferguson missouri hanceville alabama dothan alabama mulga alabama assault Donald Trump, fort payne alabama tarrant alabama anniston alabama, Alonzo Ephraim self defense murder state of arizona Samuel Alito aziz sayyed CCA update LWOP kimberly alabama rainbow city alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon serial Woods v State terell corey mcmullin kenneth eugene billups sarah koenig capital offenses eighth amendment, court systems, abuse Malone v State keith v state making a murderer john earle redfearn IV v state mobile alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth decatur alabama narcotics investigation Tracie Todd ex parte briseno stanley brent chapman russell calhoun alabama law enforcement agency legende v state Shonda Walker, asia mcclain operation crackdown Stephen Breyer Eutaw Alabama huntsville alabama William Pryor hall v florida stoves v state identity theft brady v maryland fake kidnapping, baldwin county alabama hoover alabama fourth amendment arson battles v state drug busts eugene lee jones v state oneonta alabama home repair fraud towles v state theft utah supreme court cherokee county alabama Guy Terrell Junior huntsville steve avery economic growth pinson alabama Lucky D Arcade alabama supreme court burglary warrantless blood draws the mannequin challenge hurst mandamus eric sterling pruitt v state criminal mischief department of justice netflix illegal gambling capital murder aiding and abetting lethal injection drugs albertville alabama mountain brook alabama warrior alabama debtor prison alabama criminal law roundup fraudulent checks illegal gun carry Alabaster alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix New York Times editorial Neil Gorsuch abduction capital punishment court of criminal appeals abandonment tuscaloosa alabama shooting death utah v strieff West Alabama state of alabama underage drinking road rage sexual assault heritage christian university department of justice, alabama homicide death penalty, strickland v washington christian guitierez drug possession, Xavier Beasley blountsville alabama mcwilliams v dunn ake v oklahoma brendan dassey animal cruelty fultondale alabama brian fredick lucas Tommy Arthur talladega superspeedway drug activity shooting prostitution sting greene county alabama shoplifting birmingham alabama parole scotus Fentanyl death penalty gadsden alabama implied consent judicial override Pleasant Grove Alabama Sardis Alabama pell city alabama unlawful manufacturing beylund v north dakota Ingmire v State moving violations jerry bohannon Dylann Roof baltimore city circuit court homicide rate adger alabama gun control foley alabama Easter campbell v state executions OJ Simpson court of criminal appeal releases drug crimes Walker County Alabama breaking and entering edwards v arizona § 13A-3-23 trussville alabama attempted murder heflin alabama florence alabama Benn v State mccalla alabama lauderdale county alabama morgan county alabama maryland court of special appeals Glaze v State kidnapping madison alabama Kay Ivey hoax destructive devices lethal injection crime of passion moore v texas benjamin todd acton domestic abuse eleventh circuit ruling montgomery alabama hurst v florida Etowah County Alabama, dora alabama car accident dekalb county alabama sheffield v state concealed carry criminal justice reform, felony assaults SCOTUS, peyton pruitt constitutional violations sentencing law and policy blog summaries marion county calhoun county alabama OJ Simpson Made in America 2016 election, blount county alabama constitutional law, shelby county second amendment drug trafficking, mike gilotti Thomas Hardiman cullman alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church gun rights st clair county alabama social media Jefferson County Alabama mount olive alabama morris alabama birchfield v north dakota minor offenses levins v state drug seizure Adamsville alabama theft of property adnan syed, criminal justice texas springville alabama bernard v north dakota ring v arizona



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.