CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Supreme Court Update - New Protections Against Executing The Mentally Disabled

J.D. Lloyd - Thursday, March 30, 2017


Moore v. Texas (U.S. Supreme Court, March 28/2017)


Moore was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death. In post-trial proceedings, a circuit court concluded that Mr. Moore was intellectually disabled and, thus, ineligible for execution under Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) and Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. ___ (2014). The circuit court based its decision on the most current medical guidelines. However, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (“CCA”) rejected that conclusion and re-instated Moore’s death sentence. The CCA concluded that the circuit court erred in not following factors laid out in Ex parte Briseno, 135 S. W. 3d 1( 2004), which relied upon medical authority from 1992. Moore appealed, claiming the CCA’s reasoning violated the Eighth Amendment.



In Atkins, the Supreme Court opened the door to allow states to develop their own tests for determining intellectual disability and ineligibility for the death penalty. However, as the states have developed different tests, the Court has indicated it will review these procedures to determine whether the states have created “an unacceptable risk that persons with intellectual disability will be executed.” Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. at ___. Here, the Court took aim at Texas’ Atkins test for determining intellectual disability which was centered around out-dated medical information and court-created “factors” that have been widely criticized.


In holding that Mr. Moore was ineligible for the death penalty under Atkins, the circuit court relied on medical diagnostic standards coming from the 11th edition of the American Association on Intellectual and Development Disabilities (“AAIDD”) clinical manual and the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (“DSM-5”) published by the American Psychiatric Association. The court followed the “generally accepted, uncontroversial intellectual-disability diagnostic definitions” in reaching their conclusion. Basically, the circuit court relied on the most up-to-date diagnostic material in assessing Moore.


The CCA rejected the circuit court’s conclusion and chastised it for not applying the Briseno test for determining intellectual disability. The Briseno test was based upon the 9th edition of the AAIDD and included a seven-factor test that was not grounded in any medical authority -- just a judicial creation. The CCA recognized that the standards in the AAIDD may have changed, but concluded that the Briseno test “remained adequately informed by the medical community’s diagnostic framework.”


The Supreme Court concluded that the CCA’s reliance on out-dated medical information and “factors” that have been widely criticized and rejected in the legal and medical community could not comport with the Eighth Amendment as well as Atkins and Hall. While the State’s have leeway in formulating their own approach to addressing Atkins claims, the cornerstone of any scheme must be “the medical community’s diagnostic framework.”



Read the decision here



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


making a murderer mccalla alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church abandonment forced isolation mount olive alabama Neil Gorsuch operation crackdown Etowah County Alabama, foley alabama asia mcclain animal cruelty Lucky D Arcade capital murder department of justice, Dylann Roof constitutional violations beylund v north dakota Marengo County Alabama ring v arizona morris alabama gun rights court of criminal appeals mcwilliams v dunn homicide rate Walker County Alabama dekalb county alabama alfonso morris nathan woods death penalty aiding and abetting debtor prison netflix Joshua Reese eleventh circuit ruling shoplifting sixth amendment social media albertville alabama madison alabama alabama criminal law roundup alabama springville alabama death penalty, unlawful manufacturing narcotics investigation hurst mandamus lauderdale county alabama stanley brent chapman drug seizure strickland v washington alabama law enforcement agency kidnapping Shonda Walker, apprendi v new jersey calhoun county alabama florence alabama Rule 32 judicial override fairfield alabama, Woods v State armed robbery huntsville alabama drug busts christmas shooting baldwin county alabama terell corey mcmullin heflin alabama bessemer alabama campbell v state Fentanyl economic growth abduction § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing st clair county alabama blount county alabama West Alabama battles v state greene county alabama operation bullseye Easter decatur alabama pelham alabama utah v strieff prostitution sting kenneth eugene billups hall v florida illegal gambling street racing SCOTUS, endangerment of a child levins v state arson pinson alabama theft of property heritage christian university abuse mike gilotti Tommy Arthur eugene lee jones v state negligent homicide eighth amendment, Samuel Alito Xavier Beasley self defense blountsville alabama pruitt v state towles v state keith v state adger alabama Justice Sotomayor identity theft clarence thomas pell city alabama homicide criminal justice reform, legende v state sentencing law and policy blog summaries drug trafficking, benjamin todd acton fraudulent checks sarah koenig smith v state OJ Simpson Made in America fake kidnapping, bailey v us LWOP bernard v north dakota debit card skimming scams moore v texas gadsden alabama burglary theft cherokee county alabama tarrant alabama Mike Hubbard brendan dassey oneonta alabama home repair fraud mobile alabama warrior alabama avondale alabama drug possession, constitutional law, serial domestic abuse maryland court of special appeals hanceville alabama shelby county Thomas Hardiman Jefferson County Alabama road rage shooting parole court of criminal appeal releases Kay Ivey texas jerry bohannon Alabaster alabama birmingham alabama stoves v state drug activity aziz sayyed ex parte briseno utah supreme court betton v state assault brady v maryland hurst v florida William Pryor CCA update habeas corpus relief drug crimes alabama supreme court felony assaults moving violations domestic violence nicholas hawkins Gardendale Alabama birchfield v north dakota public assistance fraud second amendment trussville alabama the mannequin challenge kimberly alabama department of justice capital offenses minor offenses rainbow city alabama hoax destructive devices capital punishment russell calhoun Adamsville alabama marion county OJ Simpson dora alabama § 13A-3-23 28 U.S.C. § 2254 lamar county underage drinking car accident huntsville concealed carry Hillary Clinton, criminal justice Kareem Dacar Gaymon scotus shooting death gun control editorial attempted murder mountain brook alabama criminal mischief christian guitierez murder implied consent lethal injection drugs hoover alabama Stephen Breyer edwards v arizona Pleasant Grove Alabama church robberies ferguson missouri Wesley Adam Whitworth executions Tracie Todd brookside alabama eric sterling Eutaw Alabama montgomery alabama dothan alabama fourth amendment ake v oklahoma lethal injection mulga alabama Glaze v State 2016 election, state of alabama Benn v State boaz alabama US Supreme Court Update robberies illegal gun carry banville v state morgan county alabama state of arizona limestone county alabama tuscaloosa alabama cullman alabama baltimore city circuit court Alonzo Ephraim adnan syed, sheffield v state warrantless blood draws steve avery anniston alabama, midazolam south carolina Ingmire v State embezzlement brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix talladega superspeedway peyton pruitt fraud crime of passion john earle redfearn IV v state Donald Trump, npr drug smuggling court systems, breaking and entering fort payne alabama Sardis Alabama sexual assault brian fredick lucas New York Times fultondale alabama bomb threat Guy Terrell Junior Malone v State



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.