CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Supreme Court Update - New Protections Against Executing The Mentally Disabled

J.D. Lloyd - Thursday, March 30, 2017


Moore v. Texas (U.S. Supreme Court, March 28/2017)


Moore was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death. In post-trial proceedings, a circuit court concluded that Mr. Moore was intellectually disabled and, thus, ineligible for execution under Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) and Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. ___ (2014). The circuit court based its decision on the most current medical guidelines. However, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (“CCA”) rejected that conclusion and re-instated Moore’s death sentence. The CCA concluded that the circuit court erred in not following factors laid out in Ex parte Briseno, 135 S. W. 3d 1( 2004), which relied upon medical authority from 1992. Moore appealed, claiming the CCA’s reasoning violated the Eighth Amendment.



In Atkins, the Supreme Court opened the door to allow states to develop their own tests for determining intellectual disability and ineligibility for the death penalty. However, as the states have developed different tests, the Court has indicated it will review these procedures to determine whether the states have created “an unacceptable risk that persons with intellectual disability will be executed.” Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. at ___. Here, the Court took aim at Texas’ Atkins test for determining intellectual disability which was centered around out-dated medical information and court-created “factors” that have been widely criticized.


In holding that Mr. Moore was ineligible for the death penalty under Atkins, the circuit court relied on medical diagnostic standards coming from the 11th edition of the American Association on Intellectual and Development Disabilities (“AAIDD”) clinical manual and the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (“DSM-5”) published by the American Psychiatric Association. The court followed the “generally accepted, uncontroversial intellectual-disability diagnostic definitions” in reaching their conclusion. Basically, the circuit court relied on the most up-to-date diagnostic material in assessing Moore.


The CCA rejected the circuit court’s conclusion and chastised it for not applying the Briseno test for determining intellectual disability. The Briseno test was based upon the 9th edition of the AAIDD and included a seven-factor test that was not grounded in any medical authority -- just a judicial creation. The CCA recognized that the standards in the AAIDD may have changed, but concluded that the Briseno test “remained adequately informed by the medical community’s diagnostic framework.”


The Supreme Court concluded that the CCA’s reliance on out-dated medical information and “factors” that have been widely criticized and rejected in the legal and medical community could not comport with the Eighth Amendment as well as Atkins and Hall. While the State’s have leeway in formulating their own approach to addressing Atkins claims, the cornerstone of any scheme must be “the medical community’s diagnostic framework.”



Read the decision here



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


parole gadsden alabama CCA update state of alabama pinson alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church pell city alabama Walker County Alabama executions death penalty talladega superspeedway the mannequin challenge drug activity Mike Hubbard 2016 election, capital murder ring v arizona bomb threat arson identity theft birmingham alabama montgomery alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon midazolam fort payne alabama abandonment serial drug seizure limestone county alabama judicial override hurst mandamus Shonda Walker, social media aiding and abetting moore v texas calhoun county alabama fake kidnapping, strickland v washington court of criminal appeal releases warrior alabama Justice Sotomayor animal cruelty trussville alabama department of justice Stephen Breyer terell corey mcmullin robberies prostitution sting hall v florida christian guitierez abduction clarence thomas gun control drug trafficking, dothan alabama homicide rate Glaze v State West Alabama benjamin todd acton felony assaults Alabaster alabama Gardendale Alabama drug smuggling road rage constitutional law, baltimore city circuit court operation bullseye crime of passion morgan county alabama underage drinking second amendment christmas shooting sixth amendment hurst v florida debit card skimming scams concealed carry street racing Alonzo Ephraim kimberly alabama Eutaw Alabama eugene lee jones v state pelham alabama self defense alabama criminal law roundup st clair county alabama Tommy Arthur economic growth domestic abuse florence alabama mobile alabama moving violations shooting death OJ Simpson Made in America levins v state brady v maryland illegal gun carry capital punishment heritage christian university Joshua Reese tarrant alabama Hillary Clinton, albertville alabama New York Times beylund v north dakota 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Kay Ivey birchfield v north dakota embezzlement alabama baldwin county alabama narcotics investigation blountsville alabama john earle redfearn IV v state Adamsville alabama negligent homicide Sardis Alabama mountain brook alabama bessemer alabama marion county Thomas Hardiman utah supreme court apprendi v new jersey burglary § 13A-3-23 Dylann Roof Tracie Todd peyton pruitt brendan dassey home repair fraud armed robbery mulga alabama sarah koenig lethal injection drugs adnan syed, minor offenses pruitt v state alfonso morris death penalty, shelby county ex parte briseno mcwilliams v dunn Benn v State cullman alabama fourth amendment OJ Simpson maryland court of special appeals US Supreme Court Update ferguson missouri towles v state Lucky D Arcade utah v strieff betton v state rainbow city alabama Etowah County Alabama, § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing habeas corpus relief netflix drug busts mccalla alabama fairfield alabama, Neil Gorsuch Rule 32 stoves v state breaking and entering kidnapping Wesley Adam Whitworth mike gilotti aziz sayyed endangerment of a child fultondale alabama LWOP heflin alabama Guy Terrell Junior hoax destructive devices Ingmire v State texas bernard v north dakota forced isolation state of arizona constitutional violations asia mcclain brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix madison alabama lamar county hoover alabama stanley brent chapman homicide brian fredick lucas sentencing law and policy blog summaries campbell v state legende v state theft shooting Donald Trump, making a murderer William Pryor domestic violence jerry bohannon eleventh circuit ruling criminal justice huntsville alabama banville v state cherokee county alabama church robberies operation crackdown foley alabama morris alabama implied consent department of justice, anniston alabama, fraud fraudulent checks oneonta alabama Marengo County Alabama attempted murder murder smith v state lethal injection dora alabama blount county alabama huntsville gun rights editorial sheffield v state warrantless blood draws Samuel Alito alabama supreme court drug possession, court systems, steve avery nathan woods Jefferson County Alabama boaz alabama alabama law enforcement agency decatur alabama springville alabama criminal mischief avondale alabama SCOTUS, eric sterling Malone v State keith v state scotus mount olive alabama russell calhoun Xavier Beasley Fentanyl Pleasant Grove Alabama sexual assault greene county alabama bailey v us dekalb county alabama illegal gambling lauderdale county alabama Easter hanceville alabama criminal justice reform, drug crimes court of criminal appeals edwards v arizona tuscaloosa alabama car accident capital offenses battles v state assault Woods v State nicholas hawkins theft of property eighth amendment, unlawful manufacturing adger alabama kenneth eugene billups abuse npr public assistance fraud south carolina brookside alabama shoplifting ake v oklahoma debtor prison



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.