CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Supreme Court Update - New Protections Against Executing The Mentally Disabled

J.D. Lloyd - Thursday, March 30, 2017


Moore v. Texas (U.S. Supreme Court, March 28/2017)


Moore was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death. In post-trial proceedings, a circuit court concluded that Mr. Moore was intellectually disabled and, thus, ineligible for execution under Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) and Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. ___ (2014). The circuit court based its decision on the most current medical guidelines. However, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (“CCA”) rejected that conclusion and re-instated Moore’s death sentence. The CCA concluded that the circuit court erred in not following factors laid out in Ex parte Briseno, 135 S. W. 3d 1( 2004), which relied upon medical authority from 1992. Moore appealed, claiming the CCA’s reasoning violated the Eighth Amendment.



In Atkins, the Supreme Court opened the door to allow states to develop their own tests for determining intellectual disability and ineligibility for the death penalty. However, as the states have developed different tests, the Court has indicated it will review these procedures to determine whether the states have created “an unacceptable risk that persons with intellectual disability will be executed.” Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. at ___. Here, the Court took aim at Texas’ Atkins test for determining intellectual disability which was centered around out-dated medical information and court-created “factors” that have been widely criticized.


In holding that Mr. Moore was ineligible for the death penalty under Atkins, the circuit court relied on medical diagnostic standards coming from the 11th edition of the American Association on Intellectual and Development Disabilities (“AAIDD”) clinical manual and the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (“DSM-5”) published by the American Psychiatric Association. The court followed the “generally accepted, uncontroversial intellectual-disability diagnostic definitions” in reaching their conclusion. Basically, the circuit court relied on the most up-to-date diagnostic material in assessing Moore.


The CCA rejected the circuit court’s conclusion and chastised it for not applying the Briseno test for determining intellectual disability. The Briseno test was based upon the 9th edition of the AAIDD and included a seven-factor test that was not grounded in any medical authority -- just a judicial creation. The CCA recognized that the standards in the AAIDD may have changed, but concluded that the Briseno test “remained adequately informed by the medical community’s diagnostic framework.”


The Supreme Court concluded that the CCA’s reliance on out-dated medical information and “factors” that have been widely criticized and rejected in the legal and medical community could not comport with the Eighth Amendment as well as Atkins and Hall. While the State’s have leeway in formulating their own approach to addressing Atkins claims, the cornerstone of any scheme must be “the medical community’s diagnostic framework.”



Read the decision here



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


pinson alabama birmingham alabama Ingmire v State adger alabama apprendi v new jersey Etowah County Alabama, shoplifting capital murder peyton pruitt § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing Stephen Breyer baltimore city circuit court OJ Simpson maryland court of special appeals Walker County Alabama avondale alabama alabama law enforcement agency criminal justice reform, foley alabama theft marion county gun control keith v state montgomery alabama florence alabama john earle redfearn IV v state jerry bohannon blountsville alabama death penalty, state of arizona Dylann Roof pelham alabama banville v state illegal gambling baldwin county alabama eugene lee jones v state fultondale alabama editorial cherokee county alabama ex parte briseno Kay Ivey mulga alabama second amendment CCA update mobile alabama making a murderer operation bullseye limestone county alabama ferguson missouri terell corey mcmullin murder Jefferson County Alabama cullman alabama robberies self defense abuse abduction church robberies fraud Xavier Beasley bessemer alabama criminal justice mike gilotti brookside alabama Sardis Alabama nathan woods huntsville alabama beylund v north dakota christian guitierez kidnapping utah v strieff Hillary Clinton, tuscaloosa alabama LWOP towles v state criminal mischief aiding and abetting underage drinking sheffield v state alabama supreme court judicial override armed robbery court systems, Neil Gorsuch Lucky D Arcade sarah koenig brendan dassey alabama New York Times identity theft mountain brook alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon US Supreme Court Update drug crimes Thomas Hardiman concealed carry Tracie Todd blount county alabama habeas corpus relief asia mcclain Donald Trump, car accident fraudulent checks drug possession, domestic violence drug seizure moore v texas huntsville SCOTUS, levins v state embezzlement hall v florida Pleasant Grove Alabama street racing drug activity burglary midazolam sixth amendment dekalb county alabama drug trafficking, christmas shooting bomb threat Benn v State gun rights albertville alabama court of criminal appeals parole ring v arizona brian fredick lucas fairfield alabama, forced isolation 2016 election, texas battles v state assault constitutional violations warrior alabama crime of passion Woods v State Alabaster alabama Justice Sotomayor sexual assault lethal injection npr clarence thomas hurst mandamus Glaze v State home repair fraud pruitt v state legende v state st clair county alabama implied consent hoover alabama operation crackdown hoax destructive devices serial utah supreme court debit card skimming scams road rage dora alabama prostitution sting tarrant alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 eleventh circuit ruling edwards v arizona Alonzo Ephraim moving violations drug smuggling department of justice, Malone v State birchfield v north dakota Guy Terrell Junior debtor prison mcwilliams v dunn capital offenses talladega superspeedway arson economic growth narcotics investigation campbell v state rainbow city alabama § 13A-3-23 Adamsville alabama scotus greene county alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix Rule 32 brady v maryland Gardendale Alabama social media abandonment sentencing law and policy blog summaries fake kidnapping, unlawful manufacturing lamar county shooting death minor offenses executions Tommy Arthur betton v state Fentanyl anniston alabama, stoves v state shooting hanceville alabama negligent homicide Joshua Reese madison alabama felony assaults capital punishment theft of property lauderdale county alabama bailey v us oneonta alabama eric sterling illegal gun carry domestic abuse homicide gadsden alabama fort payne alabama boaz alabama trussville alabama alabama criminal law roundup heritage christian university breaking and entering the mannequin challenge pell city alabama kenneth eugene billups springville alabama Easter lethal injection drugs strickland v washington warrantless blood draws calhoun county alabama decatur alabama animal cruelty West Alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church Wesley Adam Whitworth Marengo County Alabama mccalla alabama Samuel Alito russell calhoun heflin alabama constitutional law, smith v state ake v oklahoma steve avery eighth amendment, state of alabama aziz sayyed kimberly alabama endangerment of a child drug busts William Pryor netflix morris alabama OJ Simpson Made in America Shonda Walker, stanley brent chapman court of criminal appeal releases Mike Hubbard death penalty bernard v north dakota department of justice Eutaw Alabama public assistance fraud mount olive alabama hurst v florida nicholas hawkins adnan syed, dothan alabama attempted murder south carolina homicide rate fourth amendment alfonso morris morgan county alabama shelby county benjamin todd acton



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.