CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA CASELAW UPDATE - APRIL 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, May 06, 2016


Eugene Lee Jones v. State (CR-14-1332)

 

Jones was convicted of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder, stemming from him killing a woman he suspected of setting him up in a robbery. Jones voluntarily talked to investigators on July 29, 2013, in connection to the death, but eventually stopped the questioning when he invoked his right to counsel. Jones was arrested on an outstanding warrant out of Bessemer. Jones was eventually transported back to Lauderdale County on another warrant stemming from a charge unrelated to the homicide. While still in custody, Jones was asked to submit to a polygraph examination. Jones waived his Miranda rights, submitted to the polygraph, and subsequently made another statement in which he admitted that he strangled the victim. Jones moved to suppress this statement under Edwards v. AZ, 451 US 477 (1981) on the grounds that investigators improperly re-initiated contact after he had invoked his right to counsel. The circuit court denied the motion. AFFIRMED. Relying on MD v. Shatzer, 559 US 98 (2010), the CCA affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress on the grounds that “coercive effect” of re-initiation of interrogation wasn’t present in this case like it was in Edwards. Essentially, the Court held that if enough time has passed since the initial invocation of the right to counsel -- more than 14 days -- there is no presumptively problematic re-initiation as there was in Edwards.

 

Levins v. State (CR-15-0612)

 

Bell v. State (CR-15-0618)


The appellants in these two cases were two expungement petitioners who were denied relief at the circuit court level and asked the CCA to reverse the denials of their petitions. APPEALS DISMISSED One may only challenge the denial of their expungement petition by petitioning the Alabama Supreme Court for certiorari review of the denial of the petition for expungement.


John Earle Redfearn, IV v. State (CR-14-0500)

 

This case involved the denial of a motion to suppress drugs evidence recovered from Redfearn’s body. In February 2012, law enforcement obtained a search warrant of Redfearn’s residence based upon 2 controlled buys that occurred at the residence with Redfearn. Law enforcement executed the SW after they observed Redfearn drive away from the house. He was stopped several miles away while the search of the house was going on and taken back to the house by the detaining officers. While executing the warrant, Redfearn’s girlfriend arrived at the house and eventually told the officers that Redfearn keeps drugs on his person. An officer strip-searched Redfearn at the residence and recovered a bottle containing oxycodone pills in his underwear. Redfearn moved to suppress under Bailey v. US, 133 S.Ct. 1031 (2013). AFFIRMED. The CCA explained that while Bailey held that a suspect may be lawfully detained while police are conducting a search warrant only when the person is in the "immediate vicinity" of the place to be searched, Redfearn was properly detained because the police had probable cause to arrest him based upon the controlled buys previously carried out with Redfearn and observed by law enforcement.

 

Nathaniel Woods (CR-10-0695)


Alfonso Morris (CR-11-1925)


John Russell Calhoun (CR-14-0779)

In these three cases, the CCA affirmed the denial of Rule 32 relief for death-row inmates without holding evidentiary hearings. There’s not much that’s noteworthy in these opinions outside of the observation that the petitions were summarily denied because each petitioner failed to plead sufficient facts that, if proven true, could entitle them to relief. The vast majority of the factual claims in the three petitions were bare-boned factual allegations. In Woods and Morris, petitioners raised claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present certain expert testimony at trial. The CCA affirmed the summary dismissal of these claims because the petitioner failed to identify an expert and what that expert’s testimony would have been at the pleading stage. It bears repeating that if you’re going to raise an IAC claim, in order to be entitled to a hearing, you have to give the circuit court sufficient factual allegations that the court can conclude that your claims could entitle you to relief if proven true. In the context of IAC based on the failure to call certain expert witnesses, you need to make a proffer as to who that expert would have been and what the testimony would have been at the pleading stage.

 

Brian Fredick Lucas (CR-14-0744)

 

Lucas was convicted of first-degree attempted sodomy by forcible compulsion and first-degree sexual abuse stemming from an incident in which he allegedly touched his step-daughter on the mouth with his penis while she was sleeping. The CCA reversed his first-degree sodomy conviction on the grounds that the State’s showing did not present evidence of forcible compulsion -- there was no threat by Lucas or evidence that his actions overcame her earnest resistance. The CCA did enter a judgment convicting Lucas of attempted sexual misconduct.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



 


Recent Posts


Tags

warrantless blood draws abandonment boaz alabama car accident greene county alabama Lucky D Arcade hoover alabama Glaze v State moving violations robberies ferguson missouri smith v state Fentanyl sheffield v state drug trafficking, pell city alabama criminal mischief strickland v washington capital punishment home repair fraud constitutional violations blount county alabama sexual assault decatur alabama lethal injection drugs sentencing law and policy blog summaries pruitt v state bailey v us capital murder parole madison alabama armed robbery criminal justice reform, heflin alabama mike gilotti implied consent New York Times concealed carry gun control st clair county alabama embezzlement alabama criminal law roundup baldwin county alabama hall v florida pelham alabama lauderdale county alabama fairfield alabama, Benn v State Neil Gorsuch William Pryor church robberies illegal gun carry judicial override ex parte briseno beylund v north dakota nathan woods road rage Joshua Reese brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix Donald Trump, gadsden alabama negligent homicide brian fredick lucas capital offenses aiding and abetting drug crimes hurst v florida sixth amendment Tracie Todd Walker County Alabama south carolina Woods v State Adamsville alabama minor offenses gun rights abuse morris alabama endangerment of a child Kay Ivey CCA update trussville alabama ake v oklahoma US Supreme Court Update florence alabama brendan dassey domestic violence nicholas hawkins Jefferson County Alabama brady v maryland prostitution sting kimberly alabama Samuel Alito anniston alabama, narcotics investigation tuscaloosa alabama maryland court of special appeals baltimore city circuit court forced isolation talladega superspeedway Thomas Hardiman domestic abuse heritage christian university russell calhoun banville v state Mike Hubbard habeas corpus relief utah v strieff Marengo County Alabama texas alabama law enforcement agency homicide rate serial death penalty, dora alabama mulga alabama department of justice albertville alabama drug smuggling peyton pruitt Rule 32 theft unlawful manufacturing drug activity fraud ring v arizona montgomery alabama huntsville self defense LWOP fake kidnapping, Easter christian guitierez foley alabama underage drinking Alonzo Ephraim illegal gambling 2016 election, burglary state of arizona Justice Sotomayor fraudulent checks fultondale alabama OJ Simpson abduction jerry bohannon bomb threat shooting drug possession, public assistance fraud stanley brent chapman hanceville alabama adnan syed, cullman alabama death penalty tarrant alabama pinson alabama mobile alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 eleventh circuit ruling avondale alabama mcwilliams v dunn blountsville alabama shooting death warrior alabama Shonda Walker, lethal injection Dylann Roof operation crackdown court of criminal appeal releases clarence thomas asia mcclain operation bullseye moore v texas calhoun county alabama drug busts felony assaults homicide § 13A-3-23 edwards v arizona dekalb county alabama shoplifting aziz sayyed netflix criminal justice court of criminal appeals Kareem Dacar Gaymon Ingmire v State battles v state morgan county alabama shelby county editorial identity theft fort payne alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth alfonso morris Stephen Breyer Guy Terrell Junior kenneth eugene billups keith v state john earle redfearn IV v state stoves v state campbell v state Malone v State rainbow city alabama steve avery alabama supreme court social media assault animal cruelty Alabaster alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing SCOTUS, brookside alabama sarah koenig betton v state court systems, limestone county alabama making a murderer terell corey mcmullin scotus state of alabama midazolam mccalla alabama eric sterling oneonta alabama debit card skimming scams utah supreme court cherokee county alabama Xavier Beasley Sardis Alabama Hillary Clinton, constitutional law, birchfield v north dakota kidnapping Briarwood Presbyterian Church economic growth OJ Simpson Made in America benjamin todd acton birmingham alabama lamar county towles v state bessemer alabama apprendi v new jersey legende v state debtor prison Pleasant Grove Alabama springville alabama Eutaw Alabama fourth amendment the mannequin challenge Gardendale Alabama crime of passion murder attempted murder street racing mountain brook alabama breaking and entering eugene lee jones v state executions npr West Alabama Etowah County Alabama, department of justice, hurst mandamus mount olive alabama drug seizure huntsville alabama arson christmas shooting bernard v north dakota adger alabama theft of property marion county levins v state eighth amendment, dothan alabama Tommy Arthur alabama second amendment hoax destructive devices

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.