CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

High Court Reverses Another Alabama Death Sentence

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, June 19, 2017


McWilliams v. Dunn, Comm’r ALDOC

 

Question Presented: Did Alabama courts wrongfully conclude McWilliams was not denied meaningful assistance from a mental-health expert under Ake v. Oklahoma?

 

Facts

 

McWilliams was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death for a 1994 robbery/rape/murder that took place in a convenience store in Tuscaloosa. McWilliams’ mental health was explored in depth during the course of his trial. He was examined by a “Lunacy Commission” composed of three doctors at Taylor Hardin Secure Medical Facility. After he was convicted and after the jury recommended he be sentenced to death by a vote of 10-2, McWilliams asked for neurological and neuropsychological exams. The court order a Dr. John Goff, a neuropsychologist with the State, to examine McWilliams. However, Dr. Goff’s findings were not based on a complete review of his mental health records. His report was given to McWilliams only 48 hours before the judicial sentencing phase. On the eve of the judicial sentencing hearing, Taylor Hardin and Holman Prison sent defense counsel updated records which had been subpoenaed months before. Trial counsel continuously asked the trial court for an independent expert and a continuance, but these requests were rejected.

 

Eventually, McWilliams case arrived in federal court when he filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief. Among other issues, McWilliams argued that the State deprived him of Due Process under Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 (1985). McWilliams argued this denial was a violation of “clearly established federal law” and thus entitled him to habeas corpus relief. The district court denied the request.

 

Ake v. Oklahoma

In Ake, the Court ruled that the Constitution requires the State to provide an indigent defendant with “assistance necessary to prepare an effective defense based on his mental condition” if the defendant’s sanity is in question. The ruling was framed around the concept of the “meaningful access to justice.” The expert should “assist in evaluation, preparation, and presentation of the defense.”

 

Eleventh Circuit Ruling

The Eleventh Circuit denied relief. Initially, the Court concluded that McWilliams failed to meet his burden of showing that “clearly established federal law” entitled him to an independent expert. The Eleventh Circuit noted a split in the circuits regarding whether Ake requires the appointment of an independent expert and that the Supreme Court had never resolved that split. Because the split existed, there was, in the Court’s opinion, no clearly established federal law that could entitled McWilliams relief on this claim. Additionally, the court concluded that the State courts’ determination that Ake had been satisfied was likewise not an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law.

 

Judge Wilson’s dissent

Judge Wilson believed that Ake was not satisfied here. First, the State failed to provide meaningful psychological assistance. McWilliams did not receive any expert assistance until after the sentencing hearing held before the jury. Second, the assistance McWilliams received from Dr. Goff was based on an incomplete review of the mental health records available for consideration. In Judge Wilson’s opinion, this paltry showing did not satisfy Ake and warrants habeas corpus relief.

 

Supreme Court Ruling

The Court ruled that in the particular circumstances of this case, McWilliams’ rights under Ake were not protected. The Court declined to answer the more specific question of whether Ake requires appointment of a mental health expert who is independent of the prosecution because Alabama failed to satisfy “Ake’s most basic requirements.”

 

The Court rejected Alabama’s argument that it complied with Ake by allowing Dr. Goff to examine McWilliams. Ake requires more: “[1] examination and assist in [2] evaluation, [3] preparation, and [4] presentation of the defense.” The Court concluded that even if it were to assume the State satisfied the “examination” requirement, it completely failed to satisfy the last three prongs.

 

While the 11th Circuit had ruled that whatever error McWilliams suffered was “harmless,” the Supreme Court noted that ruling was limited to just the question of whether the requested continuance would have made a difference in McWilliams sentencing. The Court pointed out that on remand the 11th Circuit should consider how the State’s failure to guarantee the remaining three prongs of Ake would have made a difference in McWilliams’ case.

 

Dissent (Alito, Roberts, Thomas, Gorsuch)

The dissent would have had the Court address the narrow question of whether it is clearly established federal law that Ake requires the appointment of an independent mental health expert. The dissent complains that Alabama didn’t have a chance to address the question the Court actually addressed. However, this simply isn’t true. Alabama briefed the merits of the underlying Ake claim at the merits stage.

 

The 11th Circuit on Remand

The Eleventh Circuit is likely to kick the case back down to the district court to address the full Ake question. It’s hard to see McWilliams’ death sentence standing when the Supreme Court has all but said 3 aspects of Ake weren’t satisfied here.

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 


Recent Posts


Tags

concealed carry drug busts mulga alabama eighth amendment, homicide ake v oklahoma breaking and entering Adamsville alabama shooting death court of criminal appeal releases eleventh circuit ruling social media state of arizona kenneth eugene billups Gardendale Alabama blount county alabama fourth amendment russell calhoun alfonso morris narcotics investigation § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing executions felony assaults moore v texas operation crackdown sentencing law and policy blog summaries fort payne alabama warrantless blood draws maryland court of special appeals betton v state gun rights constitutional law, Glaze v State embezzlement blountsville alabama ferguson missouri brady v maryland decatur alabama habeas corpus relief department of justice, Pleasant Grove Alabama attempted murder Hillary Clinton, cherokee county alabama state of alabama jerry bohannon department of justice tuscaloosa alabama Benn v State William Pryor capital murder tarrant alabama shooting keith v state lethal injection drugs beylund v north dakota calhoun county alabama criminal justice reform, stoves v state gadsden alabama baltimore city circuit court lethal injection limestone county alabama criminal mischief stanley brent chapman assault robberies the mannequin challenge Dylann Roof abuse shelby county springville alabama aziz sayyed hurst mandamus drug seizure Thomas Hardiman banville v state fake kidnapping, hurst v florida alabama law enforcement agency sarah koenig bessemer alabama abduction talladega superspeedway LWOP eric sterling rainbow city alabama greene county alabama criminal justice Samuel Alito Walker County Alabama lauderdale county alabama capital punishment court of criminal appeals terell corey mcmullin abandonment shoplifting prostitution sting illegal gun carry mcwilliams v dunn domestic violence baldwin county alabama unlawful manufacturing Shonda Walker, benjamin todd acton fraudulent checks john earle redfearn IV v state burglary huntsville alabama Justice Sotomayor nathan woods homicide rate New York Times eugene lee jones v state Lucky D Arcade Briarwood Presbyterian Church car accident brian fredick lucas anniston alabama, CCA update adnan syed, Xavier Beasley Joshua Reese cullman alabama pruitt v state armed robbery apprendi v new jersey steve avery aiding and abetting towles v state Easter alabama second amendment Tommy Arthur Tracie Todd montgomery alabama campbell v state Mike Hubbard constitutional violations legende v state huntsville debtor prison 2016 election, economic growth negligent homicide avondale alabama OJ Simpson OJ Simpson Made in America fairfield alabama, § 13A-3-23 Sardis Alabama albertville alabama utah v strieff levins v state mount olive alabama hoover alabama boaz alabama hanceville alabama netflix midazolam Alonzo Ephraim morgan county alabama brookside alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 nicholas hawkins madison alabama self defense pell city alabama making a murderer dekalb county alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon npr ex parte briseno street racing edwards v arizona death penalty, gun control oneonta alabama operation bullseye theft of property heflin alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth adger alabama drug crimes Jefferson County Alabama drug smuggling strickland v washington animal cruelty Kay Ivey capital offenses brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix mountain brook alabama Alabaster alabama sexual assault mobile alabama south carolina heritage christian university West Alabama trussville alabama sixth amendment kidnapping Donald Trump, fultondale alabama church robberies dora alabama battles v state death penalty domestic abuse underage drinking christian guitierez marion county Malone v State lamar county kimberly alabama brendan dassey smith v state editorial Marengo County Alabama scotus foley alabama drug trafficking, bailey v us arson crime of passion bernard v north dakota murder ring v arizona florence alabama alabama supreme court identity theft forced isolation hoax destructive devices sheffield v state Rule 32 Stephen Breyer warrior alabama Woods v State illegal gambling Eutaw Alabama home repair fraud theft birmingham alabama Etowah County Alabama, pelham alabama public assistance fraud judicial override hall v florida Ingmire v State st clair county alabama moving violations birchfield v north dakota US Supreme Court Update Guy Terrell Junior bomb threat texas parole minor offenses alabama criminal law roundup road rage peyton pruitt Neil Gorsuch clarence thomas debit card skimming scams christmas shooting mike gilotti asia mcclain serial implied consent drug activity pinson alabama court systems, Fentanyl utah supreme court SCOTUS, endangerment of a child drug possession, mccalla alabama dothan alabama morris alabama fraud

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.