CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

High Court Reverses Another Alabama Death Sentence

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, June 19, 2017


McWilliams v. Dunn, Comm’r ALDOC

 

Question Presented: Did Alabama courts wrongfully conclude McWilliams was not denied meaningful assistance from a mental-health expert under Ake v. Oklahoma?

 

Facts

 

McWilliams was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death for a 1994 robbery/rape/murder that took place in a convenience store in Tuscaloosa. McWilliams’ mental health was explored in depth during the course of his trial. He was examined by a “Lunacy Commission” composed of three doctors at Taylor Hardin Secure Medical Facility. After he was convicted and after the jury recommended he be sentenced to death by a vote of 10-2, McWilliams asked for neurological and neuropsychological exams. The court order a Dr. John Goff, a neuropsychologist with the State, to examine McWilliams. However, Dr. Goff’s findings were not based on a complete review of his mental health records. His report was given to McWilliams only 48 hours before the judicial sentencing phase. On the eve of the judicial sentencing hearing, Taylor Hardin and Holman Prison sent defense counsel updated records which had been subpoenaed months before. Trial counsel continuously asked the trial court for an independent expert and a continuance, but these requests were rejected.

 

Eventually, McWilliams case arrived in federal court when he filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief. Among other issues, McWilliams argued that the State deprived him of Due Process under Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 (1985). McWilliams argued this denial was a violation of “clearly established federal law” and thus entitled him to habeas corpus relief. The district court denied the request.

 

Ake v. Oklahoma

In Ake, the Court ruled that the Constitution requires the State to provide an indigent defendant with “assistance necessary to prepare an effective defense based on his mental condition” if the defendant’s sanity is in question. The ruling was framed around the concept of the “meaningful access to justice.” The expert should “assist in evaluation, preparation, and presentation of the defense.”

 

Eleventh Circuit Ruling

The Eleventh Circuit denied relief. Initially, the Court concluded that McWilliams failed to meet his burden of showing that “clearly established federal law” entitled him to an independent expert. The Eleventh Circuit noted a split in the circuits regarding whether Ake requires the appointment of an independent expert and that the Supreme Court had never resolved that split. Because the split existed, there was, in the Court’s opinion, no clearly established federal law that could entitled McWilliams relief on this claim. Additionally, the court concluded that the State courts’ determination that Ake had been satisfied was likewise not an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law.

 

Judge Wilson’s dissent

Judge Wilson believed that Ake was not satisfied here. First, the State failed to provide meaningful psychological assistance. McWilliams did not receive any expert assistance until after the sentencing hearing held before the jury. Second, the assistance McWilliams received from Dr. Goff was based on an incomplete review of the mental health records available for consideration. In Judge Wilson’s opinion, this paltry showing did not satisfy Ake and warrants habeas corpus relief.

 

Supreme Court Ruling

The Court ruled that in the particular circumstances of this case, McWilliams’ rights under Ake were not protected. The Court declined to answer the more specific question of whether Ake requires appointment of a mental health expert who is independent of the prosecution because Alabama failed to satisfy “Ake’s most basic requirements.”

 

The Court rejected Alabama’s argument that it complied with Ake by allowing Dr. Goff to examine McWilliams. Ake requires more: “[1] examination and assist in [2] evaluation, [3] preparation, and [4] presentation of the defense.” The Court concluded that even if it were to assume the State satisfied the “examination” requirement, it completely failed to satisfy the last three prongs.

 

While the 11th Circuit had ruled that whatever error McWilliams suffered was “harmless,” the Supreme Court noted that ruling was limited to just the question of whether the requested continuance would have made a difference in McWilliams sentencing. The Court pointed out that on remand the 11th Circuit should consider how the State’s failure to guarantee the remaining three prongs of Ake would have made a difference in McWilliams’ case.

 

Dissent (Alito, Roberts, Thomas, Gorsuch)

The dissent would have had the Court address the narrow question of whether it is clearly established federal law that Ake requires the appointment of an independent mental health expert. The dissent complains that Alabama didn’t have a chance to address the question the Court actually addressed. However, this simply isn’t true. Alabama briefed the merits of the underlying Ake claim at the merits stage.

 

The 11th Circuit on Remand

The Eleventh Circuit is likely to kick the case back down to the district court to address the full Ake question. It’s hard to see McWilliams’ death sentence standing when the Supreme Court has all but said 3 aspects of Ake weren’t satisfied here.

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 


Recent Posts


Tags

Dylann Roof § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing fraud Easter death penalty, anniston alabama, eugene lee jones v state domestic abuse CCA update drug seizure felony assaults warrior alabama self defense criminal justice reform, trussville alabama department of justice, Kareem Dacar Gaymon church robberies Fentanyl cullman alabama Guy Terrell Junior constitutional law, keith v state gun control OJ Simpson foley alabama ake v oklahoma ring v arizona greene county alabama Justice Sotomayor legende v state aiding and abetting theft of property blountsville alabama the mannequin challenge hanceville alabama springville alabama russell calhoun clarence thomas brian fredick lucas criminal mischief brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix ex parte briseno terell corey mcmullin editorial Xavier Beasley Etowah County Alabama, cherokee county alabama bailey v us brady v maryland pinson alabama Tracie Todd battles v state habeas corpus relief sentencing law and policy blog summaries dekalb county alabama Sardis Alabama sexual assault kidnapping mike gilotti domestic violence Wesley Adam Whitworth utah v strieff gun rights Alabaster alabama fake kidnapping, West Alabama drug possession, lethal injection drugs Neil Gorsuch moore v texas baltimore city circuit court kenneth eugene billups decatur alabama Woods v State pruitt v state attempted murder hurst mandamus nathan woods pell city alabama bessemer alabama john earle redfearn IV v state illegal gambling sheffield v state capital punishment homicide crime of passion tuscaloosa alabama alabama supreme court fraudulent checks huntsville social media drug trafficking, smith v state capital offenses oneonta alabama judicial override OJ Simpson Made in America abduction marion county Marengo County Alabama negligent homicide shoplifting mountain brook alabama midazolam maryland court of special appeals criminal justice christmas shooting Mike Hubbard benjamin todd acton eleventh circuit ruling Alonzo Ephraim Pleasant Grove Alabama narcotics investigation albertville alabama Rule 32 Stephen Breyer aziz sayyed minor offenses endangerment of a child animal cruelty utah supreme court burglary SCOTUS, limestone county alabama William Pryor adnan syed, levins v state Eutaw Alabama birchfield v north dakota avondale alabama homicide rate steve avery alabama law enforcement agency fort payne alabama brendan dassey illegal gun carry Hillary Clinton, Kay Ivey state of alabama state of arizona serial drug activity second amendment edwards v arizona embezzlement Thomas Hardiman st clair county alabama lauderdale county alabama Glaze v State kimberly alabama hoover alabama forced isolation Benn v State shelby county Malone v State murder stanley brent chapman nicholas hawkins US Supreme Court Update morris alabama eric sterling peyton pruitt prostitution sting hall v florida drug smuggling towles v state home repair fraud drug busts netflix Jefferson County Alabama arson making a murderer dora alabama mccalla alabama south carolina christian guitierez mobile alabama sarah koenig blount county alabama alabama hoax destructive devices court of criminal appeals mount olive alabama apprendi v new jersey capital murder Walker County Alabama alabama criminal law roundup ferguson missouri mcwilliams v dunn death penalty betton v state public assistance fraud baldwin county alabama Joshua Reese drug crimes gadsden alabama debit card skimming scams theft boaz alabama adger alabama huntsville alabama robberies jerry bohannon Briarwood Presbyterian Church heritage christian university morgan county alabama Tommy Arthur operation bullseye 28 U.S.C. § 2254 pelham alabama strickland v washington armed robbery montgomery alabama underage drinking calhoun county alabama bernard v north dakota car accident lamar county assault street racing Adamsville alabama fultondale alabama court systems, moving violations talladega superspeedway breaking and entering heflin alabama asia mcclain tarrant alabama warrantless blood draws New York Times florence alabama birmingham alabama LWOP department of justice eighth amendment, executions mulga alabama court of criminal appeal releases shooting death 2016 election, npr constitutional violations debtor prison texas alfonso morris economic growth Ingmire v State scotus bomb threat § 13A-3-23 hurst v florida sixth amendment implied consent Lucky D Arcade brookside alabama fairfield alabama, abuse operation crackdown lethal injection identity theft road rage Samuel Alito concealed carry beylund v north dakota shooting stoves v state dothan alabama parole rainbow city alabama banville v state madison alabama campbell v state unlawful manufacturing fourth amendment Shonda Walker, abandonment Donald Trump, Gardendale Alabama

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.