CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA CASELAW UPDATE - APRIL 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, May 06, 2016


Eugene Lee Jones v. State (CR-14-1332)

 

Jones was convicted of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder, stemming from him killing a woman he suspected of setting him up in a robbery. Jones voluntarily talked to investigators on July 29, 2013, in connection to the death, but eventually stopped the questioning when he invoked his right to counsel. Jones was arrested on an outstanding warrant out of Bessemer. Jones was eventually transported back to Lauderdale County on another warrant stemming from a charge unrelated to the homicide. While still in custody, Jones was asked to submit to a polygraph examination. Jones waived his Miranda rights, submitted to the polygraph, and subsequently made another statement in which he admitted that he strangled the victim. Jones moved to suppress this statement under Edwards v. AZ, 451 US 477 (1981) on the grounds that investigators improperly re-initiated contact after he had invoked his right to counsel. The circuit court denied the motion. AFFIRMED. Relying on MD v. Shatzer, 559 US 98 (2010), the CCA affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress on the grounds that “coercive effect” of re-initiation of interrogation wasn’t present in this case like it was in Edwards. Essentially, the Court held that if enough time has passed since the initial invocation of the right to counsel -- more than 14 days -- there is no presumptively problematic re-initiation as there was in Edwards.

 

Levins v. State (CR-15-0612)

 

Bell v. State (CR-15-0618)


The appellants in these two cases were two expungement petitioners who were denied relief at the circuit court level and asked the CCA to reverse the denials of their petitions. APPEALS DISMISSED One may only challenge the denial of their expungement petition by petitioning the Alabama Supreme Court for certiorari review of the denial of the petition for expungement.


John Earle Redfearn, IV v. State (CR-14-0500)

 

This case involved the denial of a motion to suppress drugs evidence recovered from Redfearn’s body. In February 2012, law enforcement obtained a search warrant of Redfearn’s residence based upon 2 controlled buys that occurred at the residence with Redfearn. Law enforcement executed the SW after they observed Redfearn drive away from the house. He was stopped several miles away while the search of the house was going on and taken back to the house by the detaining officers. While executing the warrant, Redfearn’s girlfriend arrived at the house and eventually told the officers that Redfearn keeps drugs on his person. An officer strip-searched Redfearn at the residence and recovered a bottle containing oxycodone pills in his underwear. Redfearn moved to suppress under Bailey v. US, 133 S.Ct. 1031 (2013). AFFIRMED. The CCA explained that while Bailey held that a suspect may be lawfully detained while police are conducting a search warrant only when the person is in the "immediate vicinity" of the place to be searched, Redfearn was properly detained because the police had probable cause to arrest him based upon the controlled buys previously carried out with Redfearn and observed by law enforcement.

 

Nathaniel Woods (CR-10-0695)


Alfonso Morris (CR-11-1925)


John Russell Calhoun (CR-14-0779)

In these three cases, the CCA affirmed the denial of Rule 32 relief for death-row inmates without holding evidentiary hearings. There’s not much that’s noteworthy in these opinions outside of the observation that the petitions were summarily denied because each petitioner failed to plead sufficient facts that, if proven true, could entitle them to relief. The vast majority of the factual claims in the three petitions were bare-boned factual allegations. In Woods and Morris, petitioners raised claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present certain expert testimony at trial. The CCA affirmed the summary dismissal of these claims because the petitioner failed to identify an expert and what that expert’s testimony would have been at the pleading stage. It bears repeating that if you’re going to raise an IAC claim, in order to be entitled to a hearing, you have to give the circuit court sufficient factual allegations that the court can conclude that your claims could entitle you to relief if proven true. In the context of IAC based on the failure to call certain expert witnesses, you need to make a proffer as to who that expert would have been and what the testimony would have been at the pleading stage.

 

Brian Fredick Lucas (CR-14-0744)

 

Lucas was convicted of first-degree attempted sodomy by forcible compulsion and first-degree sexual abuse stemming from an incident in which he allegedly touched his step-daughter on the mouth with his penis while she was sleeping. The CCA reversed his first-degree sodomy conviction on the grounds that the State’s showing did not present evidence of forcible compulsion -- there was no threat by Lucas or evidence that his actions overcame her earnest resistance. The CCA did enter a judgment convicting Lucas of attempted sexual misconduct.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



 


Recent Posts


Tags

Benn v State gun control fairfield alabama, LWOP constitutional law, heritage christian university Stephen Breyer capital punishment texas greene county alabama ring v arizona smith v state death penalty, limestone county alabama forced isolation theft of property Alonzo Ephraim Tracie Todd oneonta alabama jerry bohannon legende v state CCA update decatur alabama fourth amendment benjamin todd acton rainbow city alabama Sardis Alabama § 13A-3-23 netflix christmas shooting church robberies murder peyton pruitt OJ Simpson Made in America drug busts Walker County Alabama Hillary Clinton, Etowah County Alabama, madison alabama operation bullseye West Alabama editorial aiding and abetting fraudulent checks narcotics investigation hoover alabama endangerment of a child morgan county alabama economic growth Neil Gorsuch baldwin county alabama assault russell calhoun road rage drug trafficking, debit card skimming scams clarence thomas huntsville alabama nathan woods Jefferson County Alabama department of justice, drug smuggling identity theft Wesley Adam Whitworth bailey v us public assistance fraud john earle redfearn IV v state eleventh circuit ruling making a murderer pell city alabama birmingham alabama avondale alabama arson levins v state kimberly alabama state of alabama criminal justice reform, foley alabama florence alabama brookside alabama OJ Simpson hurst v florida mike gilotti court of criminal appeal releases debtor prison Alabaster alabama shooting death blount county alabama crime of passion unlawful manufacturing Easter gun rights betton v state robberies armed robbery sentencing law and policy blog summaries Guy Terrell Junior keith v state birchfield v north dakota mountain brook alabama maryland court of special appeals Xavier Beasley utah supreme court stanley brent chapman sarah koenig negligent homicide hall v florida implied consent street racing lethal injection ake v oklahoma brian fredick lucas alfonso morris Glaze v State operation crackdown christian guitierez home repair fraud st clair county alabama trussville alabama New York Times towles v state Ingmire v State brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix Dylann Roof warrantless blood draws Adamsville alabama cherokee county alabama mccalla alabama fake kidnapping, alabama supreme court mobile alabama social media brady v maryland albertville alabama bomb threat springville alabama montgomery alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon Mike Hubbard attempted murder ferguson missouri Thomas Hardiman alabama self defense Donald Trump, burglary stoves v state Lucky D Arcade banville v state theft prostitution sting strickland v washington marion county Briarwood Presbyterian Church aziz sayyed adnan syed, adger alabama drug crimes fultondale alabama utah v strieff alabama law enforcement agency fort payne alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama dora alabama illegal gun carry kidnapping sheffield v state scotus terell corey mcmullin concealed carry Tommy Arthur hanceville alabama SCOTUS, judicial override kenneth eugene billups animal cruelty shoplifting 28 U.S.C. § 2254 campbell v state tuscaloosa alabama parole state of arizona Marengo County Alabama brendan dassey mulga alabama eric sterling 2016 election, department of justice drug possession, abuse alabama criminal law roundup apprendi v new jersey tarrant alabama breaking and entering criminal mischief anniston alabama, pinson alabama talladega superspeedway warrior alabama court of criminal appeals death penalty mount olive alabama moore v texas mcwilliams v dunn Kay Ivey illegal gambling Joshua Reese the mannequin challenge capital murder shelby county nicholas hawkins south carolina William Pryor Fentanyl lauderdale county alabama abandonment capital offenses second amendment huntsville felony assaults lethal injection drugs embezzlement hurst mandamus dothan alabama Rule 32 Justice Sotomayor bernard v north dakota drug seizure midazolam constitutional violations battles v state lamar county minor offenses beylund v north dakota abduction domestic abuse Malone v State Gardendale Alabama calhoun county alabama gadsden alabama pruitt v state Shonda Walker, npr car accident pelham alabama dekalb county alabama Samuel Alito homicide sixth amendment drug activity underage drinking domestic violence cullman alabama sexual assault § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing serial heflin alabama court systems, executions US Supreme Court Update boaz alabama eighth amendment, baltimore city circuit court criminal justice asia mcclain bessemer alabama eugene lee jones v state edwards v arizona ex parte briseno fraud habeas corpus relief shooting Eutaw Alabama hoax destructive devices steve avery homicide rate moving violations morris alabama blountsville alabama Woods v State

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.