CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

US Supreme Court Update - Utah v. Strieff

J.D. Lloyd - Thursday, June 23, 2016



The Salt Lake City PD received an anonymous tip regarding drug activity at a house. A detective watched the house and saw folks coming and leaving after only a short duration. To him, this evidenced drug activity going on inside. The detective observed Strieff leave the house. He followed Strieff and eventually stopped him. The detective asked for Strieff’s ID and found out that Strieff had an outstanding warrant on traffic tickets. He arrested Strieff and searched him as incident to that arrest. Of course, the detective finds meth and meth paraphernalia.


After being charged, Strieff moved to suppress the drug evidence on the grounds that the detective illegally detained him. The State conceded that the detective did not have reasonable suspicion to stop Strieff, but argued that the “existence of the warrant attenuated the connection between the unlawful stop and the discovery of contraband.” A lower court affirmed denial of the suppression motion, but the Utah Supreme Court reversed.




The Court concluded that the exclusionary rule did not require suppression of this evidence because the discovery of the warranted attenuated the connection between the unconstitutional police actions and the discovery of the drugs.


Long ago, the Court created the “exclusionary rule” to exclude unlawfully seized evidence, also referred to as “fruit of the poisonous tree.” The Court has stressed that it’s to be applied so long as its “deterrence benefits outweigh the societal costs.” There are several exceptions to this rule, one of which is called “attenuation doctrine” which provides that suppression isn’t proper when the connection between the unconstitutional action and the seized evidence is either “remote” or interrupted by some “intervening circumstance.” At question here is the latter concern: was the discovery of a valid warrant an event sufficient to break the chain between the unlawful stop and the discovery of the drugs.


The Court employs a three-part test to answer this question: (1) What is the temporal proximity between the illegal conduct and the discovery of evidence? (2) What are the intervening circumstances?   (3) What was the purpose of the conduct and how flagrant was it?


While the Court found that the short time between the constitutional violation and discovery of the evidence favored suppression, the last two facts strongly favored not applying the exclusionary rule. Under the second prong, the existence of a valid warrant was a significant intervening circumstance. Once he discovered it, he was under an obligation to arrest Strieff. With respect to the final prong, the Court didn’t believe the detective’s actions were flagrant or part of “systemic or recurrent police misconduct”: while the initial detention was “at most negligent,” his actions after the stop were “lawful.”


The dissents in this case are quite strong. Justice Kagan’s dissent states that this decision effectively invites police to make illegal stop.


My Thoughts


If you look at this case objectively, the Court’s decision makes sense: if a police officer happens to learn someone has an outstanding valid warrant for their arrest, that officer has the duty to arrest them. If an arrest is made pursuant to a lawful warrant, police may search the arrestee. Thus, the search extends from the valid warrant.


But if you look at this case subjectively, the Supreme Court has given police officers leeway to engage in unconstitutional behavior. There’s really no way around it. The Court has told officers who would rather investigate outside the boundaries of the Fourth Amendment, “Hey, we’ve got your back in the borderline cases.” Count me in Justice Kagan’s camp.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


Neil Gorsuch baltimore city circuit court implied consent economic growth New York Times domestic violence 2016 election, felony assaults marion county mike gilotti hoax destructive devices lamar county rainbow city alabama south carolina ferguson missouri death penalty, Tracie Todd fraudulent checks hurst mandamus talladega superspeedway state of alabama brendan dassey russell calhoun beylund v north dakota huntsville alabama burglary netflix eugene lee jones v state anniston alabama, domestic abuse scotus john earle redfearn IV v state Thomas Hardiman § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing Justice Sotomayor springville alabama dora alabama Etowah County Alabama, abuse Briarwood Presbyterian Church constitutional law, drug trafficking, endangerment of a child Mike Hubbard unlawful manufacturing apprendi v new jersey department of justice npr judicial override concealed carry eleventh circuit ruling road rage terell corey mcmullin lethal injection brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix brookside alabama court of criminal appeals pelham alabama habeas corpus relief fort payne alabama sheffield v state murder hall v florida alabama criminal law roundup dothan alabama legende v state cherokee county alabama drug possession, Easter bomb threat fraud parole morris alabama stoves v state texas campbell v state Jefferson County Alabama illegal gambling abduction operation crackdown nicholas hawkins gun rights kenneth eugene billups underage drinking forced isolation illegal gun carry gadsden alabama warrior alabama fultondale alabama Donald Trump, operation bullseye home repair fraud hanceville alabama sentencing law and policy blog summaries alabama law enforcement agency prostitution sting debit card skimming scams alabama supreme court making a murderer fourth amendment hurst v florida warrantless blood draws mount olive alabama court systems, towles v state constitutional violations baldwin county alabama birchfield v north dakota christmas shooting Woods v State criminal justice reform, second amendment debtor prison Gardendale Alabama utah supreme court shooting death narcotics investigation cullman alabama the mannequin challenge Shonda Walker, albertville alabama gun control dekalb county alabama mobile alabama adnan syed, Xavier Beasley Benn v State shelby county eighth amendment, drug smuggling maryland court of special appeals car accident levins v state drug seizure public assistance fraud pruitt v state hoover alabama crime of passion steve avery Alonzo Ephraim morgan county alabama Walker County Alabama strickland v washington limestone county alabama William Pryor benjamin todd acton montgomery alabama Samuel Alito kidnapping street racing tarrant alabama moving violations robberies aziz sayyed self defense ake v oklahoma serial fake kidnapping, boaz alabama Tommy Arthur Sardis Alabama tuscaloosa alabama bailey v us asia mcclain oneonta alabama shooting department of justice, banville v state court of criminal appeal releases Lucky D Arcade utah v strieff § 13A-3-23 clarence thomas Malone v State death penalty nathan woods moore v texas alfonso morris Stephen Breyer mccalla alabama US Supreme Court Update Eutaw Alabama keith v state SCOTUS, minor offenses decatur alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama Glaze v State ex parte briseno shoplifting betton v state editorial Ingmire v State ring v arizona edwards v arizona theft of property florence alabama bessemer alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 pell city alabama sixth amendment st clair county alabama Hillary Clinton, animal cruelty negligent homicide theft eric sterling Guy Terrell Junior executions mulga alabama blountsville alabama attempted murder abandonment Fentanyl brady v maryland assault mountain brook alabama midazolam social media OJ Simpson trussville alabama West Alabama mcwilliams v dunn avondale alabama homicide foley alabama CCA update birmingham alabama madison alabama homicide rate peyton pruitt battles v state church robberies adger alabama sexual assault state of arizona Kay Ivey aiding and abetting Adamsville alabama identity theft pinson alabama calhoun county alabama capital punishment criminal justice drug crimes armed robbery jerry bohannon capital offenses brian fredick lucas Marengo County Alabama kimberly alabama OJ Simpson Made in America fairfield alabama, criminal mischief embezzlement smith v state lethal injection drugs alabama blount county alabama LWOP Wesley Adam Whitworth Kareem Dacar Gaymon drug busts Rule 32 Dylann Roof breaking and entering heritage christian university arson stanley brent chapman bernard v north dakota Joshua Reese huntsville greene county alabama christian guitierez Alabaster alabama drug activity heflin alabama sarah koenig capital murder lauderdale county alabama



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.