CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeal Releases from March 17, 2017

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, March 27, 2017


Keith v. State (CR-15-1319)

Keith pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and first-degree unlawful possession of marijuana after police found drugs under the front seat of his car during an inventory search. Officers pulled Keith over when they ran his license plate and realized the tag didn’t match his car. When they ran Keith’s ID, they discovered he had outstanding warrants and placed him under arrest. His car was searched as an inventory search and the drugs were found inside. Keith moved to suppress on the grounds that the search was improper warrantless search.

REVERSED. The Court concluded that the State failed to show that inventory search was carried out “according to standard criteria and on the basis of something other than suspicion of criminal activity.” The Court focused on Ex parte Boyd, 542 So. 2d 1276 (Ala. 1989), where the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that an inventory search was not valid because there was no evidence that law enforcement carried out the search pursuant to policy. Here, the Court found the same deficiencies that the Boyd court found: conclusory statements regarding following inventory policy, a lack of an inventory list, no copy of the policy was presented, and no evidence the officer followed that policy. Judge Joiner wrote a lengthy dissent.


Thoughts: I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Alabama Supreme Court take this issue up and ask for clarification for inventory searches andBoyd’s lasting effect. To me, inventory search precedent focuses on whether officers can show a search really was an administrative search and not a fishing expedition.


Sheffield v. State (CR-15-1467)

Sheffield was convicted of murder. He argued that he shot the victim in self-defense or by accident. At trial, the State introduced a recording of a heated phone conversation between the defendant and his wife, which was pretty damning to the defense -- she basically said he murdered the victim and didn’t act in self defense. Sheffield tried to invoke martial privilege to exclude the conversation, but the court allowed its introduction via Rule 804(b)(3) -- statements against interest. The State’s theory was that it was against the spouse’s interest for Sheffield to get convicted of murder.

REVERSED. The Court acknowledged that this was a question of first impression -- whether a declarant’s statements made against her spouse’s penal interest may also be considered against her own pecuniary or proprietary interest. In looking at Oregon case law, the Court concluded that the test as to whether a statement fits within the purview of Rule 804(b)(3) comes down to two central questions: (1) Was the declarant’s primary motive in making the statement to hurt or help her own interest; and (2) Was the risk to the declarant-spouse so great that the statements are inherently reliable? Here, the Court concluded the statements were not against Sheffield’s spouse’s interest (she wanted to divorce him), so they should not have been admitted under Rule 804(b)(3). Moreover, the Court concluded that this error wasn’t harmless given slight evidence presented surrounding the fatal moments.


Smith v. State (CR13-0055)

Smith was convicted of two counts of capital murder for a brutal kidnapping-murder/robbery-murder he carried out. At sentencing, the victim’s mother and sister testified that they believed the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for Smith. Smith argued on appeal that this testimony was improper.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED. The Court concluded the victim’s family’s recommendations were improper victim impact statements regarding recommended sentences under Booth v. Maryland. The Court found these statements to be plain error and vacated the death sentence.

Thoughts: I’m not going to be surprised if this gets reversed by the AL SC saying that this error didn’t rise to the level of plain error. I could see the AL SC using Judge Windom’s dissent as a blue print for re-imposing Smith’s death sentence.


Legendre v. State (CR-16-0008)

Legendre was on probation and his PO filed a delinquency report alleging that he failed to report, left the state without permission, didn’t pay supervision fees, failed to pay court-ordered moneys, failed to report to CRO and failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse program. At the hearing, the PO testified to trying to contact Legendre and how Legendre had missed meetings with her. In revoking, the court concluded that Legendre’s failure to report rose to the level of “absconding,” which allowed the court to fully revoke his probation. Legendre appealed claiming that he had not absconded.

AFFIRMED. The Court concluded that between his failure to report and his failure to communicate with the PO once she had contacted, the State presented sufficient evidence to prove that Legendre absconded and could be fully revoke.


Banville v. State (CR-15-1384)

The preclusive bar of Rule 32.2(d) does not bar a second Rule 32 petition if the first Rule 32 petition was based only upon Rule 32.1(f) -- a request to file an out-of-time appeal.


Campbell v. State (CR-15-1187)

Stoves v. State (CR-14-1687)

Both of these cases involved a reversal of one conviction on Double Jeopardy grounds (i.e., duplicate offenses), but an affirming of the remaining counts. Both are fact-intensive and not particularly noteworthy.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


Ingmire v State calhoun county alabama drug possession, Adamsville alabama sheffield v state sexual assault christian guitierez Jefferson County Alabama decatur alabama keith v state nathan woods drug smuggling south carolina fraud shooting john earle redfearn IV v state campbell v state tarrant alabama steve avery drug activity constitutional law, st clair county alabama texas Kareem Dacar Gaymon eleventh circuit ruling mccalla alabama albertville alabama embezzlement brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix capital offenses mobile alabama court of criminal appeals drug busts levins v state brady v maryland betton v state lamar county making a murderer bernard v north dakota strickland v washington fourth amendment concealed carry edwards v arizona huntsville battles v state drug trafficking, prostitution sting William Pryor christmas shooting eighth amendment, npr domestic violence Rule 32 social media drug crimes fultondale alabama blountsville alabama bailey v us forced isolation morris alabama Xavier Beasley Alabaster alabama domestic abuse Malone v State Glaze v State home repair fraud arson illegal gambling robberies gadsden alabama attempted murder animal cruelty beylund v north dakota sixth amendment foley alabama anniston alabama, operation bullseye criminal justice reform, montgomery alabama editorial dora alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 criminal justice mulga alabama avondale alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth felony assaults marion county street racing brian fredick lucas abduction dothan alabama eugene lee jones v state SCOTUS, eric sterling sentencing law and policy blog summaries alfonso morris hanceville alabama second amendment Fentanyl alabama law enforcement agency West Alabama gun rights Shonda Walker, Neil Gorsuch US Supreme Court Update Tracie Todd peyton pruitt benjamin todd acton apprendi v new jersey negligent homicide Mike Hubbard mountain brook alabama mcwilliams v dunn lethal injection kidnapping murder Marengo County Alabama adger alabama car accident self defense blount county alabama executions hurst mandamus jerry bohannon Etowah County Alabama, death penalty § 13A-3-23 ex parte briseno greene county alabama state of arizona homicide rate dekalb county alabama gun control criminal mischief birchfield v north dakota alabama criminal law roundup florence alabama ake v oklahoma hurst v florida judicial override road rage Joshua Reese burglary capital punishment Easter terell corey mcmullin debtor prison limestone county alabama Tommy Arthur identity theft springville alabama mount olive alabama scotus cullman alabama russell calhoun baltimore city circuit court OJ Simpson Made in America tuscaloosa alabama underage drinking Donald Trump, Walker County Alabama mike gilotti public assistance fraud LWOP homicide aiding and abetting legende v state Briarwood Presbyterian Church utah supreme court bomb threat sarah koenig hoover alabama breaking and entering endangerment of a child netflix alabama supreme court clarence thomas stoves v state economic growth court of criminal appeal releases boaz alabama lethal injection drugs maryland court of special appeals Kay Ivey fort payne alabama fraudulent checks department of justice the mannequin challenge oneonta alabama banville v state abandonment Stephen Breyer utah v strieff Pleasant Grove Alabama parole minor offenses talladega superspeedway operation crackdown serial brendan dassey Eutaw Alabama pell city alabama pinson alabama huntsville alabama illegal gun carry Dylann Roof debit card skimming scams § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing towles v state Benn v State nicholas hawkins cherokee county alabama morgan county alabama ring v arizona court systems, unlawful manufacturing shelby county implied consent OJ Simpson Sardis Alabama shoplifting stanley brent chapman bessemer alabama Justice Sotomayor birmingham alabama midazolam narcotics investigation warrior alabama abuse moving violations armed robbery rainbow city alabama Guy Terrell Junior 2016 election, kimberly alabama aziz sayyed theft drug seizure asia mcclain Alonzo Ephraim trussville alabama death penalty, adnan syed, capital murder ferguson missouri church robberies theft of property CCA update pruitt v state New York Times Lucky D Arcade kenneth eugene billups shooting death hall v florida pelham alabama moore v texas hoax destructive devices crime of passion Thomas Hardiman warrantless blood draws brookside alabama smith v state Hillary Clinton, alabama constitutional violations heflin alabama state of alabama department of justice, fairfield alabama, Samuel Alito madison alabama fake kidnapping, assault lauderdale county alabama Woods v State habeas corpus relief heritage christian university Gardendale Alabama baldwin county alabama



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.