CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeal Releases from March 17, 2017

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, March 27, 2017


Keith v. State (CR-15-1319)

Keith pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and first-degree unlawful possession of marijuana after police found drugs under the front seat of his car during an inventory search. Officers pulled Keith over when they ran his license plate and realized the tag didn’t match his car. When they ran Keith’s ID, they discovered he had outstanding warrants and placed him under arrest. His car was searched as an inventory search and the drugs were found inside. Keith moved to suppress on the grounds that the search was improper warrantless search.

REVERSED. The Court concluded that the State failed to show that inventory search was carried out “according to standard criteria and on the basis of something other than suspicion of criminal activity.” The Court focused on Ex parte Boyd, 542 So. 2d 1276 (Ala. 1989), where the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that an inventory search was not valid because there was no evidence that law enforcement carried out the search pursuant to policy. Here, the Court found the same deficiencies that the Boyd court found: conclusory statements regarding following inventory policy, a lack of an inventory list, no copy of the policy was presented, and no evidence the officer followed that policy. Judge Joiner wrote a lengthy dissent.


Thoughts: I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Alabama Supreme Court take this issue up and ask for clarification for inventory searches andBoyd’s lasting effect. To me, inventory search precedent focuses on whether officers can show a search really was an administrative search and not a fishing expedition.


Sheffield v. State (CR-15-1467)

Sheffield was convicted of murder. He argued that he shot the victim in self-defense or by accident. At trial, the State introduced a recording of a heated phone conversation between the defendant and his wife, which was pretty damning to the defense -- she basically said he murdered the victim and didn’t act in self defense. Sheffield tried to invoke martial privilege to exclude the conversation, but the court allowed its introduction via Rule 804(b)(3) -- statements against interest. The State’s theory was that it was against the spouse’s interest for Sheffield to get convicted of murder.

REVERSED. The Court acknowledged that this was a question of first impression -- whether a declarant’s statements made against her spouse’s penal interest may also be considered against her own pecuniary or proprietary interest. In looking at Oregon case law, the Court concluded that the test as to whether a statement fits within the purview of Rule 804(b)(3) comes down to two central questions: (1) Was the declarant’s primary motive in making the statement to hurt or help her own interest; and (2) Was the risk to the declarant-spouse so great that the statements are inherently reliable? Here, the Court concluded the statements were not against Sheffield’s spouse’s interest (she wanted to divorce him), so they should not have been admitted under Rule 804(b)(3). Moreover, the Court concluded that this error wasn’t harmless given slight evidence presented surrounding the fatal moments.


Smith v. State (CR13-0055)

Smith was convicted of two counts of capital murder for a brutal kidnapping-murder/robbery-murder he carried out. At sentencing, the victim’s mother and sister testified that they believed the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for Smith. Smith argued on appeal that this testimony was improper.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED. The Court concluded the victim’s family’s recommendations were improper victim impact statements regarding recommended sentences under Booth v. Maryland. The Court found these statements to be plain error and vacated the death sentence.

Thoughts: I’m not going to be surprised if this gets reversed by the AL SC saying that this error didn’t rise to the level of plain error. I could see the AL SC using Judge Windom’s dissent as a blue print for re-imposing Smith’s death sentence.


Legendre v. State (CR-16-0008)

Legendre was on probation and his PO filed a delinquency report alleging that he failed to report, left the state without permission, didn’t pay supervision fees, failed to pay court-ordered moneys, failed to report to CRO and failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse program. At the hearing, the PO testified to trying to contact Legendre and how Legendre had missed meetings with her. In revoking, the court concluded that Legendre’s failure to report rose to the level of “absconding,” which allowed the court to fully revoke his probation. Legendre appealed claiming that he had not absconded.

AFFIRMED. The Court concluded that between his failure to report and his failure to communicate with the PO once she had contacted, the State presented sufficient evidence to prove that Legendre absconded and could be fully revoke.


Banville v. State (CR-15-1384)

The preclusive bar of Rule 32.2(d) does not bar a second Rule 32 petition if the first Rule 32 petition was based only upon Rule 32.1(f) -- a request to file an out-of-time appeal.


Campbell v. State (CR-15-1187)

Stoves v. State (CR-14-1687)

Both of these cases involved a reversal of one conviction on Double Jeopardy grounds (i.e., duplicate offenses), but an affirming of the remaining counts. Both are fact-intensive and not particularly noteworthy.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


car accident parole madison alabama minor offenses moore v texas court of criminal appeal releases battles v state jerry bohannon Alonzo Ephraim adnan syed, judicial override home repair fraud constitutional law, brendan dassey maryland court of special appeals Marengo County Alabama florence alabama banville v state hoax destructive devices Kay Ivey beylund v north dakota christian guitierez peyton pruitt making a murderer asia mcclain ake v oklahoma Hillary Clinton, lethal injection drugs Jefferson County Alabama heritage christian university terell corey mcmullin state of alabama operation crackdown Pleasant Grove Alabama Dylann Roof department of justice, OJ Simpson Fentanyl sixth amendment montgomery alabama department of justice Xavier Beasley gun control eighth amendment, baldwin county alabama unlawful manufacturing debit card skimming scams benjamin todd acton aziz sayyed warrior alabama abuse Adamsville alabama negligent homicide scotus pruitt v state dothan alabama capital murder robberies domestic abuse lamar county § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing kimberly alabama LWOP New York Times homicide pinson alabama steve avery fraudulent checks midazolam ring v arizona public assistance fraud Etowah County Alabama, calhoun county alabama utah v strieff morgan county alabama church robberies boaz alabama Stephen Breyer drug seizure implied consent oneonta alabama lethal injection hoover alabama alabama supreme court felony assaults debtor prison habeas corpus relief drug activity hurst v florida huntsville warrantless blood draws decatur alabama fake kidnapping, capital offenses drug busts clarence thomas sarah koenig hanceville alabama attempted murder mountain brook alabama heflin alabama Thomas Hardiman brookside alabama pell city alabama russell calhoun constitutional violations Easter alabama criminal law roundup West Alabama blount county alabama criminal justice CCA update Glaze v State alfonso morris ferguson missouri economic growth narcotics investigation crime of passion ex parte briseno south carolina stanley brent chapman court systems, 2016 election, second amendment birchfield v north dakota st clair county alabama fairfield alabama, Rule 32 springville alabama fourth amendment court of criminal appeals fort payne alabama Sardis Alabama drug smuggling talladega superspeedway Benn v State homicide rate Gardendale Alabama campbell v state identity theft road rage criminal mischief dekalb county alabama shelby county mulga alabama netflix dora alabama breaking and entering William Pryor US Supreme Court Update theft of property Kareem Dacar Gaymon eleventh circuit ruling hall v florida levins v state serial OJ Simpson Made in America apprendi v new jersey executions alabama law enforcement agency Mike Hubbard smith v state social media aiding and abetting Ingmire v State npr SCOTUS, mobile alabama betton v state Eutaw Alabama moving violations gun rights stoves v state fultondale alabama christmas shooting Briarwood Presbyterian Church state of arizona adger alabama brian fredick lucas tarrant alabama keith v state brady v maryland edwards v arizona abandonment greene county alabama concealed carry bessemer alabama Samuel Alito towles v state Joshua Reese nicholas hawkins street racing anniston alabama, sexual assault drug crimes cherokee county alabama nathan woods forced isolation Donald Trump, the mannequin challenge abduction Woods v State kidnapping eric sterling mount olive alabama animal cruelty illegal gambling albertville alabama eugene lee jones v state brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix prostitution sting lauderdale county alabama alabama john earle redfearn IV v state sentencing law and policy blog summaries Tracie Todd arson Justice Sotomayor illegal gun carry mcwilliams v dunn self defense huntsville alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth drug trafficking, hurst mandamus bernard v north dakota operation bullseye tuscaloosa alabama capital punishment sheffield v state mccalla alabama shooting murder underage drinking birmingham alabama Lucky D Arcade Tommy Arthur limestone county alabama trussville alabama bomb threat blountsville alabama embezzlement morris alabama cullman alabama Alabaster alabama armed robbery assault burglary § 13A-3-23 texas kenneth eugene billups Walker County Alabama utah supreme court Guy Terrell Junior avondale alabama marion county editorial pelham alabama rainbow city alabama theft foley alabama fraud gadsden alabama bailey v us domestic violence shooting death Shonda Walker, Malone v State Neil Gorsuch strickland v washington legende v state mike gilotti baltimore city circuit court criminal justice reform, death penalty, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 death penalty drug possession, endangerment of a child shoplifting



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.