CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeal Releases from March 17, 2017

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, March 27, 2017


Keith v. State (CR-15-1319)

Keith pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and first-degree unlawful possession of marijuana after police found drugs under the front seat of his car during an inventory search. Officers pulled Keith over when they ran his license plate and realized the tag didn’t match his car. When they ran Keith’s ID, they discovered he had outstanding warrants and placed him under arrest. His car was searched as an inventory search and the drugs were found inside. Keith moved to suppress on the grounds that the search was improper warrantless search.

REVERSED. The Court concluded that the State failed to show that inventory search was carried out “according to standard criteria and on the basis of something other than suspicion of criminal activity.” The Court focused on Ex parte Boyd, 542 So. 2d 1276 (Ala. 1989), where the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that an inventory search was not valid because there was no evidence that law enforcement carried out the search pursuant to policy. Here, the Court found the same deficiencies that the Boyd court found: conclusory statements regarding following inventory policy, a lack of an inventory list, no copy of the policy was presented, and no evidence the officer followed that policy. Judge Joiner wrote a lengthy dissent.


Thoughts: I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Alabama Supreme Court take this issue up and ask for clarification for inventory searches andBoyd’s lasting effect. To me, inventory search precedent focuses on whether officers can show a search really was an administrative search and not a fishing expedition.


Sheffield v. State (CR-15-1467)

Sheffield was convicted of murder. He argued that he shot the victim in self-defense or by accident. At trial, the State introduced a recording of a heated phone conversation between the defendant and his wife, which was pretty damning to the defense -- she basically said he murdered the victim and didn’t act in self defense. Sheffield tried to invoke martial privilege to exclude the conversation, but the court allowed its introduction via Rule 804(b)(3) -- statements against interest. The State’s theory was that it was against the spouse’s interest for Sheffield to get convicted of murder.

REVERSED. The Court acknowledged that this was a question of first impression -- whether a declarant’s statements made against her spouse’s penal interest may also be considered against her own pecuniary or proprietary interest. In looking at Oregon case law, the Court concluded that the test as to whether a statement fits within the purview of Rule 804(b)(3) comes down to two central questions: (1) Was the declarant’s primary motive in making the statement to hurt or help her own interest; and (2) Was the risk to the declarant-spouse so great that the statements are inherently reliable? Here, the Court concluded the statements were not against Sheffield’s spouse’s interest (she wanted to divorce him), so they should not have been admitted under Rule 804(b)(3). Moreover, the Court concluded that this error wasn’t harmless given slight evidence presented surrounding the fatal moments.


Smith v. State (CR13-0055)

Smith was convicted of two counts of capital murder for a brutal kidnapping-murder/robbery-murder he carried out. At sentencing, the victim’s mother and sister testified that they believed the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for Smith. Smith argued on appeal that this testimony was improper.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED. The Court concluded the victim’s family’s recommendations were improper victim impact statements regarding recommended sentences under Booth v. Maryland. The Court found these statements to be plain error and vacated the death sentence.

Thoughts: I’m not going to be surprised if this gets reversed by the AL SC saying that this error didn’t rise to the level of plain error. I could see the AL SC using Judge Windom’s dissent as a blue print for re-imposing Smith’s death sentence.


Legendre v. State (CR-16-0008)

Legendre was on probation and his PO filed a delinquency report alleging that he failed to report, left the state without permission, didn’t pay supervision fees, failed to pay court-ordered moneys, failed to report to CRO and failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse program. At the hearing, the PO testified to trying to contact Legendre and how Legendre had missed meetings with her. In revoking, the court concluded that Legendre’s failure to report rose to the level of “absconding,” which allowed the court to fully revoke his probation. Legendre appealed claiming that he had not absconded.

AFFIRMED. The Court concluded that between his failure to report and his failure to communicate with the PO once she had contacted, the State presented sufficient evidence to prove that Legendre absconded and could be fully revoke.


Banville v. State (CR-15-1384)

The preclusive bar of Rule 32.2(d) does not bar a second Rule 32 petition if the first Rule 32 petition was based only upon Rule 32.1(f) -- a request to file an out-of-time appeal.


Campbell v. State (CR-15-1187)

Stoves v. State (CR-14-1687)

Both of these cases involved a reversal of one conviction on Double Jeopardy grounds (i.e., duplicate offenses), but an affirming of the remaining counts. Both are fact-intensive and not particularly noteworthy.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


midazolam shoplifting constitutional violations kidnapping crime of passion Adamsville alabama pelham alabama lethal injection Malone v State tuscaloosa alabama Marengo County Alabama Xavier Beasley morgan county alabama hanceville alabama edwards v arizona kimberly alabama fairfield alabama, utah v strieff burglary rainbow city alabama murder peyton pruitt dothan alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing Sardis Alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon npr sheffield v state trussville alabama fraudulent checks albertville alabama Stephen Breyer heflin alabama unlawful manufacturing cullman alabama kenneth eugene billups Alonzo Ephraim sixth amendment drug seizure calhoun county alabama bessemer alabama constitutional law, bailey v us 28 U.S.C. § 2254 john earle redfearn IV v state prostitution sting Justice Sotomayor ferguson missouri st clair county alabama church robberies birchfield v north dakota greene county alabama mulga alabama bomb threat illegal gun carry self defense keith v state parole ex parte briseno shooting death capital punishment West Alabama lauderdale county alabama endangerment of a child alfonso morris strickland v washington homicide eugene lee jones v state home repair fraud street racing aiding and abetting jerry bohannon scotus armed robbery social media gadsden alabama Tommy Arthur domestic violence drug crimes limestone county alabama asia mcclain LWOP the mannequin challenge nathan woods homicide rate implied consent CCA update state of arizona brookside alabama sexual assault Eutaw Alabama mountain brook alabama road rage fake kidnapping, theft identity theft domestic abuse fourth amendment huntsville morris alabama 2016 election, Wesley Adam Whitworth moore v texas Guy Terrell Junior pruitt v state bernard v north dakota operation bullseye fort payne alabama illegal gambling betton v state hoover alabama department of justice, Easter US Supreme Court Update utah supreme court foley alabama Rule 32 pinson alabama ake v oklahoma legende v state minor offenses operation crackdown levins v state stanley brent chapman christian guitierez attempted murder oneonta alabama Glaze v State battles v state dekalb county alabama OJ Simpson serial Fentanyl ring v arizona blountsville alabama eighth amendment, assault Samuel Alito warrior alabama stoves v state brian fredick lucas Alabaster alabama beylund v north dakota forced isolation Ingmire v State towles v state netflix narcotics investigation Woods v State baltimore city circuit court terell corey mcmullin mike gilotti maryland court of special appeals moving violations alabama court of criminal appeals Jefferson County Alabama Mike Hubbard Joshua Reese benjamin todd acton drug busts death penalty, mount olive alabama Tracie Todd Shonda Walker, brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix fraud felony assaults springville alabama death penalty eleventh circuit ruling executions criminal justice reform, Thomas Hardiman abuse drug possession, court systems, adnan syed, criminal mischief drug smuggling state of alabama habeas corpus relief birmingham alabama south carolina William Pryor hurst v florida Kay Ivey campbell v state animal cruelty shooting decatur alabama robberies madison alabama texas Gardendale Alabama adger alabama gun control drug activity mccalla alabama russell calhoun arson § 13A-3-23 New York Times cherokee county alabama court of criminal appeal releases capital offenses talladega superspeedway boaz alabama christmas shooting lethal injection drugs underage drinking brady v maryland theft of property tarrant alabama marion county debit card skimming scams dora alabama hall v florida avondale alabama breaking and entering Etowah County Alabama, heritage christian university clarence thomas sentencing law and policy blog summaries apprendi v new jersey baldwin county alabama negligent homicide SCOTUS, abandonment editorial nicholas hawkins Lucky D Arcade Hillary Clinton, Walker County Alabama huntsville alabama OJ Simpson Made in America alabama law enforcement agency brendan dassey smith v state hoax destructive devices alabama supreme court debtor prison capital murder aziz sayyed Dylann Roof public assistance fraud Briarwood Presbyterian Church hurst mandamus sarah koenig judicial override making a murderer criminal justice montgomery alabama embezzlement eric sterling lamar county banville v state Neil Gorsuch economic growth anniston alabama, shelby county blount county alabama florence alabama mobile alabama fultondale alabama Donald Trump, abduction Benn v State mcwilliams v dunn alabama criminal law roundup car accident warrantless blood draws drug trafficking, Pleasant Grove Alabama second amendment concealed carry gun rights department of justice pell city alabama steve avery



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.