CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeal Releases from March 17, 2017

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, March 27, 2017

 

Keith v. State (CR-15-1319)

Keith pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and first-degree unlawful possession of marijuana after police found drugs under the front seat of his car during an inventory search. Officers pulled Keith over when they ran his license plate and realized the tag didn’t match his car. When they ran Keith’s ID, they discovered he had outstanding warrants and placed him under arrest. His car was searched as an inventory search and the drugs were found inside. Keith moved to suppress on the grounds that the search was improper warrantless search.

REVERSED. The Court concluded that the State failed to show that inventory search was carried out “according to standard criteria and on the basis of something other than suspicion of criminal activity.” The Court focused on Ex parte Boyd, 542 So. 2d 1276 (Ala. 1989), where the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that an inventory search was not valid because there was no evidence that law enforcement carried out the search pursuant to policy. Here, the Court found the same deficiencies that the Boyd court found: conclusory statements regarding following inventory policy, a lack of an inventory list, no copy of the policy was presented, and no evidence the officer followed that policy. Judge Joiner wrote a lengthy dissent.

 

Thoughts: I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Alabama Supreme Court take this issue up and ask for clarification for inventory searches andBoyd’s lasting effect. To me, inventory search precedent focuses on whether officers can show a search really was an administrative search and not a fishing expedition.

 

Sheffield v. State (CR-15-1467)

Sheffield was convicted of murder. He argued that he shot the victim in self-defense or by accident. At trial, the State introduced a recording of a heated phone conversation between the defendant and his wife, which was pretty damning to the defense -- she basically said he murdered the victim and didn’t act in self defense. Sheffield tried to invoke martial privilege to exclude the conversation, but the court allowed its introduction via Rule 804(b)(3) -- statements against interest. The State’s theory was that it was against the spouse’s interest for Sheffield to get convicted of murder.

REVERSED. The Court acknowledged that this was a question of first impression -- whether a declarant’s statements made against her spouse’s penal interest may also be considered against her own pecuniary or proprietary interest. In looking at Oregon case law, the Court concluded that the test as to whether a statement fits within the purview of Rule 804(b)(3) comes down to two central questions: (1) Was the declarant’s primary motive in making the statement to hurt or help her own interest; and (2) Was the risk to the declarant-spouse so great that the statements are inherently reliable? Here, the Court concluded the statements were not against Sheffield’s spouse’s interest (she wanted to divorce him), so they should not have been admitted under Rule 804(b)(3). Moreover, the Court concluded that this error wasn’t harmless given slight evidence presented surrounding the fatal moments.

 

Smith v. State (CR13-0055)

Smith was convicted of two counts of capital murder for a brutal kidnapping-murder/robbery-murder he carried out. At sentencing, the victim’s mother and sister testified that they believed the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for Smith. Smith argued on appeal that this testimony was improper.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED. The Court concluded the victim’s family’s recommendations were improper victim impact statements regarding recommended sentences under Booth v. Maryland. The Court found these statements to be plain error and vacated the death sentence.

Thoughts: I’m not going to be surprised if this gets reversed by the AL SC saying that this error didn’t rise to the level of plain error. I could see the AL SC using Judge Windom’s dissent as a blue print for re-imposing Smith’s death sentence.

 

Legendre v. State (CR-16-0008)

Legendre was on probation and his PO filed a delinquency report alleging that he failed to report, left the state without permission, didn’t pay supervision fees, failed to pay court-ordered moneys, failed to report to CRO and failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse program. At the hearing, the PO testified to trying to contact Legendre and how Legendre had missed meetings with her. In revoking, the court concluded that Legendre’s failure to report rose to the level of “absconding,” which allowed the court to fully revoke his probation. Legendre appealed claiming that he had not absconded.

AFFIRMED. The Court concluded that between his failure to report and his failure to communicate with the PO once she had contacted, the State presented sufficient evidence to prove that Legendre absconded and could be fully revoke.

 

Banville v. State (CR-15-1384)

The preclusive bar of Rule 32.2(d) does not bar a second Rule 32 petition if the first Rule 32 petition was based only upon Rule 32.1(f) -- a request to file an out-of-time appeal.

 

Campbell v. State (CR-15-1187)

Stoves v. State (CR-14-1687)

Both of these cases involved a reversal of one conviction on Double Jeopardy grounds (i.e., duplicate offenses), but an affirming of the remaining counts. Both are fact-intensive and not particularly noteworthy.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

the mannequin challenge arson department of justice, talladega superspeedway sentencing law and policy blog summaries parole Malone v State Briarwood Presbyterian Church limestone county alabama court systems, Glaze v State apprendi v new jersey Tracie Todd fraudulent checks Justice Sotomayor brookside alabama baldwin county alabama unlawful manufacturing heflin alabama sixth amendment kenneth eugene billups Hillary Clinton, economic growth state of arizona New York Times ring v arizona OJ Simpson brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix fake kidnapping, operation bullseye court of criminal appeal releases baltimore city circuit court constitutional violations christian guitierez gun control albertville alabama oneonta alabama Jefferson County Alabama peyton pruitt § 13A-3-23 Walker County Alabama scotus florence alabama animal cruelty moore v texas mulga alabama minor offenses burglary jerry bohannon Thomas Hardiman Easter eugene lee jones v state illegal gun carry madison alabama fultondale alabama criminal justice morgan county alabama fourth amendment drug smuggling utah supreme court robberies church robberies huntsville Sardis Alabama road rage dora alabama embezzlement fairfield alabama, prostitution sting Benn v State battles v state alfonso morris gadsden alabama beylund v north dakota terell corey mcmullin alabama brady v maryland bernard v north dakota Adamsville alabama shoplifting negligent homicide campbell v state mike gilotti maryland court of special appeals Stephen Breyer texas drug activity Alabaster alabama Tommy Arthur eighth amendment, john earle redfearn IV v state montgomery alabama birmingham alabama nicholas hawkins forced isolation Wesley Adam Whitworth shelby county tarrant alabama 2016 election, stoves v state alabama criminal law roundup Fentanyl stanley brent chapman illegal gambling Ingmire v State narcotics investigation Lucky D Arcade steve avery drug busts hoax destructive devices utah v strieff drug trafficking, identity theft south carolina social media eric sterling marion county morris alabama mobile alabama OJ Simpson Made in America abduction Neil Gorsuch breaking and entering bessemer alabama gun rights sexual assault Samuel Alito CCA update mcwilliams v dunn asia mcclain ake v oklahoma blountsville alabama russell calhoun state of alabama endangerment of a child drug crimes death penalty trussville alabama drug seizure Alonzo Ephraim brian fredick lucas calhoun county alabama mountain brook alabama editorial kidnapping pinson alabama capital punishment brendan dassey debtor prison dekalb county alabama shooting sarah koenig Guy Terrell Junior heritage christian university Donald Trump, car accident hurst v florida christmas shooting lamar county smith v state levins v state benjamin todd acton murder towles v state fraud Xavier Beasley Pleasant Grove Alabama abandonment warrior alabama underage drinking criminal justice reform, homicide William Pryor hurst mandamus bailey v us aziz sayyed fort payne alabama armed robbery mount olive alabama domestic abuse birchfield v north dakota domestic violence § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing implied consent hall v florida sheffield v state US Supreme Court Update self defense npr 28 U.S.C. § 2254 West Alabama Marengo County Alabama crime of passion department of justice judicial override eleventh circuit ruling betton v state Kay Ivey ex parte briseno blount county alabama homicide rate st clair county alabama Woods v State bomb threat nathan woods making a murderer Joshua Reese second amendment anniston alabama, attempted murder midazolam aiding and abetting abuse netflix operation crackdown tuscaloosa alabama Eutaw Alabama pell city alabama alabama law enforcement agency drug possession, adger alabama Mike Hubbard Gardendale Alabama constitutional law, pelham alabama street racing keith v state decatur alabama lauderdale county alabama court of criminal appeals springville alabama theft of property rainbow city alabama Shonda Walker, greene county alabama pruitt v state moving violations capital offenses kimberly alabama assault edwards v arizona legende v state home repair fraud lethal injection drugs foley alabama shooting death concealed carry banville v state serial alabama supreme court executions huntsville alabama capital murder dothan alabama theft hanceville alabama mccalla alabama public assistance fraud cherokee county alabama Etowah County Alabama, Kareem Dacar Gaymon felony assaults hoover alabama clarence thomas debit card skimming scams Dylann Roof warrantless blood draws LWOP criminal mischief Rule 32 strickland v washington SCOTUS, cullman alabama death penalty, adnan syed, boaz alabama lethal injection habeas corpus relief ferguson missouri avondale alabama

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.