CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeal Releases from March 17, 2017

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, March 27, 2017


Keith v. State (CR-15-1319)

Keith pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and first-degree unlawful possession of marijuana after police found drugs under the front seat of his car during an inventory search. Officers pulled Keith over when they ran his license plate and realized the tag didn’t match his car. When they ran Keith’s ID, they discovered he had outstanding warrants and placed him under arrest. His car was searched as an inventory search and the drugs were found inside. Keith moved to suppress on the grounds that the search was improper warrantless search.

REVERSED. The Court concluded that the State failed to show that inventory search was carried out “according to standard criteria and on the basis of something other than suspicion of criminal activity.” The Court focused on Ex parte Boyd, 542 So. 2d 1276 (Ala. 1989), where the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that an inventory search was not valid because there was no evidence that law enforcement carried out the search pursuant to policy. Here, the Court found the same deficiencies that the Boyd court found: conclusory statements regarding following inventory policy, a lack of an inventory list, no copy of the policy was presented, and no evidence the officer followed that policy. Judge Joiner wrote a lengthy dissent.


Thoughts: I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Alabama Supreme Court take this issue up and ask for clarification for inventory searches andBoyd’s lasting effect. To me, inventory search precedent focuses on whether officers can show a search really was an administrative search and not a fishing expedition.


Sheffield v. State (CR-15-1467)

Sheffield was convicted of murder. He argued that he shot the victim in self-defense or by accident. At trial, the State introduced a recording of a heated phone conversation between the defendant and his wife, which was pretty damning to the defense -- she basically said he murdered the victim and didn’t act in self defense. Sheffield tried to invoke martial privilege to exclude the conversation, but the court allowed its introduction via Rule 804(b)(3) -- statements against interest. The State’s theory was that it was against the spouse’s interest for Sheffield to get convicted of murder.

REVERSED. The Court acknowledged that this was a question of first impression -- whether a declarant’s statements made against her spouse’s penal interest may also be considered against her own pecuniary or proprietary interest. In looking at Oregon case law, the Court concluded that the test as to whether a statement fits within the purview of Rule 804(b)(3) comes down to two central questions: (1) Was the declarant’s primary motive in making the statement to hurt or help her own interest; and (2) Was the risk to the declarant-spouse so great that the statements are inherently reliable? Here, the Court concluded the statements were not against Sheffield’s spouse’s interest (she wanted to divorce him), so they should not have been admitted under Rule 804(b)(3). Moreover, the Court concluded that this error wasn’t harmless given slight evidence presented surrounding the fatal moments.


Smith v. State (CR13-0055)

Smith was convicted of two counts of capital murder for a brutal kidnapping-murder/robbery-murder he carried out. At sentencing, the victim’s mother and sister testified that they believed the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for Smith. Smith argued on appeal that this testimony was improper.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED. The Court concluded the victim’s family’s recommendations were improper victim impact statements regarding recommended sentences under Booth v. Maryland. The Court found these statements to be plain error and vacated the death sentence.

Thoughts: I’m not going to be surprised if this gets reversed by the AL SC saying that this error didn’t rise to the level of plain error. I could see the AL SC using Judge Windom’s dissent as a blue print for re-imposing Smith’s death sentence.


Legendre v. State (CR-16-0008)

Legendre was on probation and his PO filed a delinquency report alleging that he failed to report, left the state without permission, didn’t pay supervision fees, failed to pay court-ordered moneys, failed to report to CRO and failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse program. At the hearing, the PO testified to trying to contact Legendre and how Legendre had missed meetings with her. In revoking, the court concluded that Legendre’s failure to report rose to the level of “absconding,” which allowed the court to fully revoke his probation. Legendre appealed claiming that he had not absconded.

AFFIRMED. The Court concluded that between his failure to report and his failure to communicate with the PO once she had contacted, the State presented sufficient evidence to prove that Legendre absconded and could be fully revoke.


Banville v. State (CR-15-1384)

The preclusive bar of Rule 32.2(d) does not bar a second Rule 32 petition if the first Rule 32 petition was based only upon Rule 32.1(f) -- a request to file an out-of-time appeal.


Campbell v. State (CR-15-1187)

Stoves v. State (CR-14-1687)

Both of these cases involved a reversal of one conviction on Double Jeopardy grounds (i.e., duplicate offenses), but an affirming of the remaining counts. Both are fact-intensive and not particularly noteworthy.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


armed robbery christmas shooting Wesley Adam Whitworth abuse pell city alabama netflix moving violations ex parte briseno OJ Simpson identity theft felony assaults Stephen Breyer Tracie Todd morgan county alabama oneonta alabama Walker County Alabama lethal injection drugs crime of passion editorial hurst v florida eighth amendment, constitutional violations npr avondale alabama embezzlement court of criminal appeal releases debtor prison alabama supreme court nicholas hawkins William Pryor heflin alabama department of justice operation crackdown Eutaw Alabama bernard v north dakota banville v state endangerment of a child mike gilotti hanceville alabama towles v state Mike Hubbard Jefferson County Alabama church robberies asia mcclain illegal gun carry mount olive alabama social media betton v state fourth amendment fultondale alabama breaking and entering baltimore city circuit court US Supreme Court Update legende v state dora alabama fairfield alabama, sheffield v state making a murderer habeas corpus relief § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing maryland court of special appeals state of alabama drug smuggling Thomas Hardiman steve avery springville alabama blountsville alabama abandonment alabama criminal law roundup scotus unlawful manufacturing pruitt v state beylund v north dakota Justice Sotomayor Sardis Alabama Guy Terrell Junior parole lauderdale county alabama robberies drug activity home repair fraud lamar county forced isolation Xavier Beasley public assistance fraud homicide minor offenses arson edwards v arizona brady v maryland nathan woods aiding and abetting decatur alabama russell calhoun drug seizure court systems, Donald Trump, drug busts brookside alabama peyton pruitt second amendment car accident anniston alabama, mcwilliams v dunn CCA update Kay Ivey Easter 2016 election, midazolam theft st clair county alabama albertville alabama cullman alabama drug crimes assault alabama Woods v State gadsden alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon shoplifting levins v state sexual assault utah v strieff kimberly alabama sarah koenig illegal gambling stoves v state operation bullseye Tommy Arthur pinson alabama the mannequin challenge Neil Gorsuch Marengo County Alabama death penalty, blount county alabama capital murder dekalb county alabama homicide rate heritage christian university Pleasant Grove Alabama drug possession, Shonda Walker, fake kidnapping, Dylann Roof capital offenses montgomery alabama mountain brook alabama hoax destructive devices lethal injection warrantless blood draws narcotics investigation self defense texas ferguson missouri birchfield v north dakota ring v arizona alabama law enforcement agency Adamsville alabama shelby county adger alabama hurst mandamus morris alabama debit card skimming scams apprendi v new jersey Benn v State mccalla alabama serial south carolina fort payne alabama Glaze v State mulga alabama fraud eric sterling Hillary Clinton, road rage Etowah County Alabama, terell corey mcmullin ake v oklahoma judicial override huntsville alabama Alabaster alabama attempted murder sixth amendment madison alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix brendan dassey death penalty underage drinking Samuel Alito 28 U.S.C. § 2254 eugene lee jones v state shooting death campbell v state adnan syed, shooting gun control gun rights foley alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church theft of property hall v florida marion county LWOP christian guitierez domestic abuse kenneth eugene billups stanley brent chapman implied consent Rule 32 constitutional law, Ingmire v State Malone v State alfonso morris limestone county alabama abduction New York Times tuscaloosa alabama bessemer alabama john earle redfearn IV v state calhoun county alabama § 13A-3-23 tarrant alabama pelham alabama Alonzo Ephraim fraudulent checks Gardendale Alabama murder SCOTUS, OJ Simpson Made in America benjamin todd acton cherokee county alabama bomb threat burglary rainbow city alabama utah supreme court executions street racing talladega superspeedway animal cruelty strickland v washington domestic violence eleventh circuit ruling florence alabama mobile alabama trussville alabama clarence thomas kidnapping economic growth capital punishment negligent homicide West Alabama state of arizona department of justice, criminal justice reform, bailey v us dothan alabama court of criminal appeals warrior alabama aziz sayyed smith v state baldwin county alabama jerry bohannon prostitution sting hoover alabama drug trafficking, criminal justice Fentanyl brian fredick lucas birmingham alabama Lucky D Arcade boaz alabama battles v state keith v state Joshua Reese moore v texas sentencing law and policy blog summaries concealed carry greene county alabama criminal mischief huntsville



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.