CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.


J.D. Lloyd - Friday, May 06, 2016

Eugene Lee Jones v. State (CR-14-1332)


Jones was convicted of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder, stemming from him killing a woman he suspected of setting him up in a robbery. Jones voluntarily talked to investigators on July 29, 2013, in connection to the death, but eventually stopped the questioning when he invoked his right to counsel. Jones was arrested on an outstanding warrant out of Bessemer. Jones was eventually transported back to Lauderdale County on another warrant stemming from a charge unrelated to the homicide. While still in custody, Jones was asked to submit to a polygraph examination. Jones waived his Miranda rights, submitted to the polygraph, and subsequently made another statement in which he admitted that he strangled the victim. Jones moved to suppress this statement under Edwards v. AZ, 451 US 477 (1981) on the grounds that investigators improperly re-initiated contact after he had invoked his right to counsel. The circuit court denied the motion. AFFIRMED. Relying on MD v. Shatzer, 559 US 98 (2010), the CCA affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress on the grounds that “coercive effect” of re-initiation of interrogation wasn’t present in this case like it was in Edwards. Essentially, the Court held that if enough time has passed since the initial invocation of the right to counsel -- more than 14 days -- there is no presumptively problematic re-initiation as there was in Edwards.


Levins v. State (CR-15-0612)


Bell v. State (CR-15-0618)

The appellants in these two cases were two expungement petitioners who were denied relief at the circuit court level and asked the CCA to reverse the denials of their petitions. APPEALS DISMISSED One may only challenge the denial of their expungement petition by petitioning the Alabama Supreme Court for certiorari review of the denial of the petition for expungement.

John Earle Redfearn, IV v. State (CR-14-0500)


This case involved the denial of a motion to suppress drugs evidence recovered from Redfearn’s body. In February 2012, law enforcement obtained a search warrant of Redfearn’s residence based upon 2 controlled buys that occurred at the residence with Redfearn. Law enforcement executed the SW after they observed Redfearn drive away from the house. He was stopped several miles away while the search of the house was going on and taken back to the house by the detaining officers. While executing the warrant, Redfearn’s girlfriend arrived at the house and eventually told the officers that Redfearn keeps drugs on his person. An officer strip-searched Redfearn at the residence and recovered a bottle containing oxycodone pills in his underwear. Redfearn moved to suppress under Bailey v. US, 133 S.Ct. 1031 (2013). AFFIRMED. The CCA explained that while Bailey held that a suspect may be lawfully detained while police are conducting a search warrant only when the person is in the "immediate vicinity" of the place to be searched, Redfearn was properly detained because the police had probable cause to arrest him based upon the controlled buys previously carried out with Redfearn and observed by law enforcement.


Nathaniel Woods (CR-10-0695)

Alfonso Morris (CR-11-1925)

John Russell Calhoun (CR-14-0779)

In these three cases, the CCA affirmed the denial of Rule 32 relief for death-row inmates without holding evidentiary hearings. There’s not much that’s noteworthy in these opinions outside of the observation that the petitions were summarily denied because each petitioner failed to plead sufficient facts that, if proven true, could entitle them to relief. The vast majority of the factual claims in the three petitions were bare-boned factual allegations. In Woods and Morris, petitioners raised claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present certain expert testimony at trial. The CCA affirmed the summary dismissal of these claims because the petitioner failed to identify an expert and what that expert’s testimony would have been at the pleading stage. It bears repeating that if you’re going to raise an IAC claim, in order to be entitled to a hearing, you have to give the circuit court sufficient factual allegations that the court can conclude that your claims could entitle you to relief if proven true. In the context of IAC based on the failure to call certain expert witnesses, you need to make a proffer as to who that expert would have been and what the testimony would have been at the pleading stage.


Brian Fredick Lucas (CR-14-0744)


Lucas was convicted of first-degree attempted sodomy by forcible compulsion and first-degree sexual abuse stemming from an incident in which he allegedly touched his step-daughter on the mouth with his penis while she was sleeping. The CCA reversed his first-degree sodomy conviction on the grounds that the State’s showing did not present evidence of forcible compulsion -- there was no threat by Lucas or evidence that his actions overcame her earnest resistance. The CCA did enter a judgment convicting Lucas of attempted sexual misconduct.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


Xavier Beasley Fentanyl foley alabama eleventh circuit ruling clarence thomas Sardis Alabama cullman alabama mobile alabama montgomery alabama alabama criminal law roundup Wesley Adam Whitworth kenneth eugene billups shoplifting oneonta alabama US Supreme Court Update Jefferson County Alabama npr operation crackdown Hillary Clinton, blount county alabama habeas corpus relief § 13A-3-23 making a murderer forced isolation moore v texas concealed carry Rule 32 nicholas hawkins lethal injection drugs mike gilotti LWOP sheffield v state st clair county alabama betton v state narcotics investigation judicial override aiding and abetting morgan county alabama campbell v state heflin alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama parole criminal justice reform, lauderdale county alabama apprendi v new jersey street racing terell corey mcmullin Guy Terrell Junior hurst mandamus criminal justice maryland court of special appeals christmas shooting adnan syed, Joshua Reese second amendment Stephen Breyer limestone county alabama bernard v north dakota state of arizona 28 U.S.C. § 2254 abuse department of justice, church robberies Kareem Dacar Gaymon kimberly alabama theft jerry bohannon Marengo County Alabama Benn v State Walker County Alabama Shonda Walker, public assistance fraud Glaze v State legende v state the mannequin challenge fraudulent checks pinson alabama bailey v us arson death penalty, minor offenses warrior alabama hall v florida court systems, rainbow city alabama scotus Briarwood Presbyterian Church warrantless blood draws towles v state eighth amendment, Eutaw Alabama fake kidnapping, benjamin todd acton 2016 election, court of criminal appeal releases tarrant alabama William Pryor anniston alabama, debit card skimming scams talladega superspeedway shooting south carolina lethal injection Dylann Roof criminal mischief hurst v florida banville v state brendan dassey alfonso morris asia mcclain netflix keith v state robberies birchfield v north dakota huntsville alabama department of justice calhoun county alabama texas madison alabama fort payne alabama alabama supreme court unlawful manufacturing Donald Trump, Tracie Todd cherokee county alabama adger alabama Malone v State dothan alabama felony assaults dora alabama Easter Kay Ivey pell city alabama peyton pruitt florence alabama mulga alabama illegal gambling operation bullseye brian fredick lucas moving violations gun control drug crimes drug smuggling West Alabama aziz sayyed breaking and entering sexual assault illegal gun carry economic growth armed robbery smith v state capital offenses shelby county sixth amendment blountsville alabama stanley brent chapman self defense constitutional law, hanceville alabama fultondale alabama utah v strieff ex parte briseno SCOTUS, baldwin county alabama implied consent pruitt v state drug trafficking, § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing Alonzo Ephraim sarah koenig assault state of alabama huntsville homicide eric sterling abduction Justice Sotomayor nathan woods sentencing law and policy blog summaries bessemer alabama murder death penalty constitutional violations eugene lee jones v state ake v oklahoma marion county drug busts strickland v washington Gardendale Alabama christian guitierez drug possession, CCA update serial embezzlement stoves v state battles v state car accident negligent homicide domestic abuse Samuel Alito mccalla alabama drug seizure steve avery beylund v north dakota animal cruelty social media fairfield alabama, john earle redfearn IV v state levins v state executions domestic violence identity theft OJ Simpson Made in America avondale alabama ferguson missouri debtor prison brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix fraud OJ Simpson Adamsville alabama russell calhoun mcwilliams v dunn New York Times gun rights Tommy Arthur Thomas Hardiman Lucky D Arcade hoax destructive devices gadsden alabama midazolam Mike Hubbard decatur alabama burglary lamar county birmingham alabama brookside alabama springville alabama fourth amendment boaz alabama Alabaster alabama alabama law enforcement agency mount olive alabama ring v arizona edwards v arizona attempted murder brady v maryland tuscaloosa alabama court of criminal appeals alabama albertville alabama greene county alabama heritage christian university crime of passion morris alabama trussville alabama Ingmire v State bomb threat kidnapping Etowah County Alabama, mountain brook alabama hoover alabama editorial theft of property utah supreme court capital murder dekalb county alabama underage drinking road rage abandonment prostitution sting home repair fraud shooting death pelham alabama endangerment of a child baltimore city circuit court capital punishment Neil Gorsuch drug activity Woods v State homicide rate



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.