CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.


J.D. Lloyd - Friday, May 06, 2016

Eugene Lee Jones v. State (CR-14-1332)


Jones was convicted of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder, stemming from him killing a woman he suspected of setting him up in a robbery. Jones voluntarily talked to investigators on July 29, 2013, in connection to the death, but eventually stopped the questioning when he invoked his right to counsel. Jones was arrested on an outstanding warrant out of Bessemer. Jones was eventually transported back to Lauderdale County on another warrant stemming from a charge unrelated to the homicide. While still in custody, Jones was asked to submit to a polygraph examination. Jones waived his Miranda rights, submitted to the polygraph, and subsequently made another statement in which he admitted that he strangled the victim. Jones moved to suppress this statement under Edwards v. AZ, 451 US 477 (1981) on the grounds that investigators improperly re-initiated contact after he had invoked his right to counsel. The circuit court denied the motion. AFFIRMED. Relying on MD v. Shatzer, 559 US 98 (2010), the CCA affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress on the grounds that “coercive effect” of re-initiation of interrogation wasn’t present in this case like it was in Edwards. Essentially, the Court held that if enough time has passed since the initial invocation of the right to counsel -- more than 14 days -- there is no presumptively problematic re-initiation as there was in Edwards.


Levins v. State (CR-15-0612)


Bell v. State (CR-15-0618)

The appellants in these two cases were two expungement petitioners who were denied relief at the circuit court level and asked the CCA to reverse the denials of their petitions. APPEALS DISMISSED One may only challenge the denial of their expungement petition by petitioning the Alabama Supreme Court for certiorari review of the denial of the petition for expungement.

John Earle Redfearn, IV v. State (CR-14-0500)


This case involved the denial of a motion to suppress drugs evidence recovered from Redfearn’s body. In February 2012, law enforcement obtained a search warrant of Redfearn’s residence based upon 2 controlled buys that occurred at the residence with Redfearn. Law enforcement executed the SW after they observed Redfearn drive away from the house. He was stopped several miles away while the search of the house was going on and taken back to the house by the detaining officers. While executing the warrant, Redfearn’s girlfriend arrived at the house and eventually told the officers that Redfearn keeps drugs on his person. An officer strip-searched Redfearn at the residence and recovered a bottle containing oxycodone pills in his underwear. Redfearn moved to suppress under Bailey v. US, 133 S.Ct. 1031 (2013). AFFIRMED. The CCA explained that while Bailey held that a suspect may be lawfully detained while police are conducting a search warrant only when the person is in the "immediate vicinity" of the place to be searched, Redfearn was properly detained because the police had probable cause to arrest him based upon the controlled buys previously carried out with Redfearn and observed by law enforcement.


Nathaniel Woods (CR-10-0695)

Alfonso Morris (CR-11-1925)

John Russell Calhoun (CR-14-0779)

In these three cases, the CCA affirmed the denial of Rule 32 relief for death-row inmates without holding evidentiary hearings. There’s not much that’s noteworthy in these opinions outside of the observation that the petitions were summarily denied because each petitioner failed to plead sufficient facts that, if proven true, could entitle them to relief. The vast majority of the factual claims in the three petitions were bare-boned factual allegations. In Woods and Morris, petitioners raised claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present certain expert testimony at trial. The CCA affirmed the summary dismissal of these claims because the petitioner failed to identify an expert and what that expert’s testimony would have been at the pleading stage. It bears repeating that if you’re going to raise an IAC claim, in order to be entitled to a hearing, you have to give the circuit court sufficient factual allegations that the court can conclude that your claims could entitle you to relief if proven true. In the context of IAC based on the failure to call certain expert witnesses, you need to make a proffer as to who that expert would have been and what the testimony would have been at the pleading stage.


Brian Fredick Lucas (CR-14-0744)


Lucas was convicted of first-degree attempted sodomy by forcible compulsion and first-degree sexual abuse stemming from an incident in which he allegedly touched his step-daughter on the mouth with his penis while she was sleeping. The CCA reversed his first-degree sodomy conviction on the grounds that the State’s showing did not present evidence of forcible compulsion -- there was no threat by Lucas or evidence that his actions overcame her earnest resistance. The CCA did enter a judgment convicting Lucas of attempted sexual misconduct.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


bailey v us drug busts tarrant alabama south carolina armed robbery implied consent aziz sayyed serial fourth amendment morris alabama mountain brook alabama mobile alabama keith v state peyton pruitt kenneth eugene billups boaz alabama springville alabama gun rights identity theft eighth amendment, capital offenses towles v state russell calhoun § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing midazolam netflix Jefferson County Alabama gun control bernard v north dakota betton v state lethal injection alfonso morris utah supreme court 28 U.S.C. § 2254 apprendi v new jersey fraudulent checks shooting death Xavier Beasley Justice Sotomayor concealed carry burglary Joshua Reese the mannequin challenge oneonta alabama editorial bomb threat habeas corpus relief domestic abuse constitutional law, LWOP homicide Marengo County Alabama Malone v State Woods v State huntsville alabama eugene lee jones v state minor offenses Fentanyl anniston alabama, William Pryor dora alabama npr banville v state terell corey mcmullin Dylann Roof sentencing law and policy blog summaries Stephen Breyer Eutaw Alabama john earle redfearn IV v state maryland court of special appeals calhoun county alabama Adamsville alabama cullman alabama criminal mischief blountsville alabama social media attempted murder crime of passion negligent homicide murder madison alabama Tommy Arthur warrantless blood draws edwards v arizona hanceville alabama Shonda Walker, operation bullseye abuse state of arizona morgan county alabama pinson alabama shooting foley alabama arson court systems, second amendment drug possession, pruitt v state Ingmire v State fultondale alabama economic growth robberies Etowah County Alabama, cherokee county alabama judicial override scotus strickland v washington court of criminal appeal releases drug crimes brady v maryland Sardis Alabama lethal injection drugs abandonment kimberly alabama assault death penalty, Tracie Todd pelham alabama sheffield v state self defense utah v strieff mulga alabama birchfield v north dakota Lucky D Arcade court of criminal appeals nicholas hawkins constitutional violations sixth amendment mount olive alabama state of alabama § 13A-3-23 Briarwood Presbyterian Church brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix criminal justice reform, talladega superspeedway animal cruelty mike gilotti home repair fraud st clair county alabama hurst mandamus illegal gambling shelby county battles v state domestic violence hoover alabama alabama supreme court abduction alabama capital murder department of justice executions lamar county hall v florida moving violations marion county gadsden alabama benjamin todd acton alabama law enforcement agency tuscaloosa alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama florence alabama stoves v state Guy Terrell Junior West Alabama church robberies warrior alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth texas albertville alabama smith v state New York Times operation crackdown unlawful manufacturing OJ Simpson Made in America pell city alabama dekalb county alabama embezzlement rainbow city alabama brian fredick lucas fake kidnapping, avondale alabama mcwilliams v dunn greene county alabama trussville alabama eleventh circuit ruling fort payne alabama Easter heflin alabama US Supreme Court Update huntsville birmingham alabama stanley brent chapman nathan woods Alonzo Ephraim christmas shooting brendan dassey Neil Gorsuch moore v texas ferguson missouri narcotics investigation road rage SCOTUS, sexual assault mccalla alabama campbell v state prostitution sting Donald Trump, adger alabama Gardendale Alabama Glaze v State fraud adnan syed, CCA update sarah koenig breaking and entering public assistance fraud endangerment of a child brookside alabama levins v state drug trafficking, montgomery alabama drug seizure forced isolation christian guitierez decatur alabama hurst v florida legende v state beylund v north dakota Kareem Dacar Gaymon illegal gun carry Kay Ivey alabama criminal law roundup drug smuggling debit card skimming scams department of justice, criminal justice steve avery Walker County Alabama underage drinking theft Samuel Alito drug activity Benn v State asia mcclain bessemer alabama hoax destructive devices parole shoplifting Thomas Hardiman Hillary Clinton, felony assaults baldwin county alabama debtor prison homicide rate theft of property limestone county alabama kidnapping Rule 32 Alabaster alabama ake v oklahoma baltimore city circuit court fairfield alabama, clarence thomas blount county alabama aiding and abetting capital punishment car accident ring v arizona making a murderer eric sterling ex parte briseno 2016 election, OJ Simpson street racing lauderdale county alabama death penalty dothan alabama Mike Hubbard jerry bohannon heritage christian university



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.