CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.


J.D. Lloyd - Friday, May 06, 2016

Eugene Lee Jones v. State (CR-14-1332)


Jones was convicted of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder, stemming from him killing a woman he suspected of setting him up in a robbery. Jones voluntarily talked to investigators on July 29, 2013, in connection to the death, but eventually stopped the questioning when he invoked his right to counsel. Jones was arrested on an outstanding warrant out of Bessemer. Jones was eventually transported back to Lauderdale County on another warrant stemming from a charge unrelated to the homicide. While still in custody, Jones was asked to submit to a polygraph examination. Jones waived his Miranda rights, submitted to the polygraph, and subsequently made another statement in which he admitted that he strangled the victim. Jones moved to suppress this statement under Edwards v. AZ, 451 US 477 (1981) on the grounds that investigators improperly re-initiated contact after he had invoked his right to counsel. The circuit court denied the motion. AFFIRMED. Relying on MD v. Shatzer, 559 US 98 (2010), the CCA affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress on the grounds that “coercive effect” of re-initiation of interrogation wasn’t present in this case like it was in Edwards. Essentially, the Court held that if enough time has passed since the initial invocation of the right to counsel -- more than 14 days -- there is no presumptively problematic re-initiation as there was in Edwards.


Levins v. State (CR-15-0612)


Bell v. State (CR-15-0618)

The appellants in these two cases were two expungement petitioners who were denied relief at the circuit court level and asked the CCA to reverse the denials of their petitions. APPEALS DISMISSED One may only challenge the denial of their expungement petition by petitioning the Alabama Supreme Court for certiorari review of the denial of the petition for expungement.

John Earle Redfearn, IV v. State (CR-14-0500)


This case involved the denial of a motion to suppress drugs evidence recovered from Redfearn’s body. In February 2012, law enforcement obtained a search warrant of Redfearn’s residence based upon 2 controlled buys that occurred at the residence with Redfearn. Law enforcement executed the SW after they observed Redfearn drive away from the house. He was stopped several miles away while the search of the house was going on and taken back to the house by the detaining officers. While executing the warrant, Redfearn’s girlfriend arrived at the house and eventually told the officers that Redfearn keeps drugs on his person. An officer strip-searched Redfearn at the residence and recovered a bottle containing oxycodone pills in his underwear. Redfearn moved to suppress under Bailey v. US, 133 S.Ct. 1031 (2013). AFFIRMED. The CCA explained that while Bailey held that a suspect may be lawfully detained while police are conducting a search warrant only when the person is in the "immediate vicinity" of the place to be searched, Redfearn was properly detained because the police had probable cause to arrest him based upon the controlled buys previously carried out with Redfearn and observed by law enforcement.


Nathaniel Woods (CR-10-0695)

Alfonso Morris (CR-11-1925)

John Russell Calhoun (CR-14-0779)

In these three cases, the CCA affirmed the denial of Rule 32 relief for death-row inmates without holding evidentiary hearings. There’s not much that’s noteworthy in these opinions outside of the observation that the petitions were summarily denied because each petitioner failed to plead sufficient facts that, if proven true, could entitle them to relief. The vast majority of the factual claims in the three petitions were bare-boned factual allegations. In Woods and Morris, petitioners raised claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present certain expert testimony at trial. The CCA affirmed the summary dismissal of these claims because the petitioner failed to identify an expert and what that expert’s testimony would have been at the pleading stage. It bears repeating that if you’re going to raise an IAC claim, in order to be entitled to a hearing, you have to give the circuit court sufficient factual allegations that the court can conclude that your claims could entitle you to relief if proven true. In the context of IAC based on the failure to call certain expert witnesses, you need to make a proffer as to who that expert would have been and what the testimony would have been at the pleading stage.


Brian Fredick Lucas (CR-14-0744)


Lucas was convicted of first-degree attempted sodomy by forcible compulsion and first-degree sexual abuse stemming from an incident in which he allegedly touched his step-daughter on the mouth with his penis while she was sleeping. The CCA reversed his first-degree sodomy conviction on the grounds that the State’s showing did not present evidence of forcible compulsion -- there was no threat by Lucas or evidence that his actions overcame her earnest resistance. The CCA did enter a judgment convicting Lucas of attempted sexual misconduct.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


beylund v north dakota florence alabama parole pelham alabama court systems, Woods v State shoplifting fake kidnapping, fultondale alabama apprendi v new jersey concealed carry homicide robberies William Pryor brendan dassey capital punishment drug activity christmas shooting hanceville alabama scotus street racing utah supreme court serial eleventh circuit ruling Ingmire v State fraud steve avery cullman alabama debit card skimming scams operation bullseye maryland court of special appeals drug trafficking, bomb threat Eutaw Alabama forced isolation mountain brook alabama lauderdale county alabama huntsville alabama Etowah County Alabama, department of justice kidnapping West Alabama moore v texas Mike Hubbard bessemer alabama debtor prison murder crime of passion attempted murder campbell v state hall v florida gadsden alabama theft brookside alabama nathan woods animal cruelty New York Times terell corey mcmullin cherokee county alabama Sardis Alabama strickland v washington Thomas Hardiman narcotics investigation st clair county alabama abandonment shooting death adnan syed, sarah koenig moving violations eric sterling embezzlement mike gilotti tarrant alabama stoves v state illegal gun carry § 13A-3-23 gun control mccalla alabama huntsville peyton pruitt hurst v florida Rule 32 self defense alabama smith v state aziz sayyed criminal justice nicholas hawkins edwards v arizona second amendment brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix homicide rate birchfield v north dakota LWOP Adamsville alabama kenneth eugene billups breaking and entering jerry bohannon john earle redfearn IV v state morgan county alabama Alabaster alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing Jefferson County Alabama state of arizona betton v state baldwin county alabama abduction asia mcclain criminal justice reform, talladega superspeedway utah v strieff prostitution sting Pleasant Grove Alabama SCOTUS, trussville alabama battles v state brady v maryland mount olive alabama aiding and abetting ring v arizona Briarwood Presbyterian Church rainbow city alabama albertville alabama warrior alabama CCA update sexual assault identity theft theft of property car accident ake v oklahoma dothan alabama illegal gambling Samuel Alito death penalty negligent homicide constitutional violations road rage Neil Gorsuch court of criminal appeal releases sheffield v state felony assaults minor offenses baltimore city circuit court Lucky D Arcade habeas corpus relief keith v state shelby county public assistance fraud Easter burglary Dylann Roof Xavier Beasley decatur alabama Tommy Arthur home repair fraud tuscaloosa alabama blount county alabama drug possession, heflin alabama fairfield alabama, Benn v State lamar county state of alabama Justice Sotomayor US Supreme Court Update warrantless blood draws Joshua Reese eugene lee jones v state christian guitierez springville alabama court of criminal appeals Guy Terrell Junior Tracie Todd npr judicial override hoover alabama Donald Trump, legende v state Kareem Dacar Gaymon Gardendale Alabama capital offenses stanley brent chapman madison alabama abuse limestone county alabama mobile alabama clarence thomas boaz alabama arson criminal mischief hoax destructive devices bailey v us domestic abuse constitutional law, death penalty, drug busts lethal injection texas OJ Simpson Made in America midazolam assault fourth amendment 2016 election, alabama law enforcement agency domestic violence editorial OJ Simpson avondale alabama ex parte briseno ferguson missouri heritage christian university russell calhoun kimberly alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 levins v state montgomery alabama mulga alabama netflix Marengo County Alabama fort payne alabama dekalb county alabama pruitt v state alabama supreme court bernard v north dakota blountsville alabama Malone v State endangerment of a child social media economic growth pell city alabama Shonda Walker, south carolina department of justice, armed robbery eighth amendment, towles v state Alonzo Ephraim shooting Walker County Alabama underage drinking oneonta alabama hurst mandamus foley alabama drug smuggling dora alabama marion county benjamin todd acton drug seizure capital murder gun rights pinson alabama church robberies banville v state adger alabama brian fredick lucas sentencing law and policy blog summaries executions Fentanyl the mannequin challenge Hillary Clinton, drug crimes Wesley Adam Whitworth alabama criminal law roundup unlawful manufacturing anniston alabama, sixth amendment calhoun county alabama mcwilliams v dunn birmingham alabama Kay Ivey alfonso morris morris alabama fraudulent checks lethal injection drugs Glaze v State Stephen Breyer operation crackdown implied consent greene county alabama making a murderer



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.