CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Supreme Court Won't Hear Appeal of Making A Murderer's Brendan Dassey

J.D. Lloyd - Wednesday, June 27, 2018

Fans of the critically acclaimed, yet divisive Netflix true crime documentary, Making A Murderer, saw what is likely the end of the legal battle for Brendan Dassey, one of the two defendants charged and convicted of the 2005 murder of Teresa Halbach. The United States Supreme Court denied his petition to have that court hear his case.

Dassey, along with with his uncle and main documentary subject Steve Avery, had been convicted in the 2005 murder of Teresa Halbach, a 25-year-old photographer in Manitowoc, Wis. The coverage of his 2007 conviction in the documentary made the 28-year-old especially endearing to viewers as Dassey clearly suffered from intellectual limitations if not outright disability, his confessions were nonsensical at points, and because he had a terrible and (in my opinion) unethical and ineffective attorney at the start of his case. Dassey's lawyers and the filmmakers argued that police investigators improperly coerced his videotaped confession. The 10-part series showed the then-16 year-old Dassey being interviewed by police about the crime with neither a parent nor lawyer present. Dassey's statement was damning to the defense, but defense counsel argued his incriminating statements were coerced and fabricated.


In August 2016, a federal judge in the Eastern District of Wisconsin agreed with Dassey's that his statements should have been thrown out. However, the Wisconsin attorney general appealed the decision. The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit eventually ruled by a 4-to-3 vote that the district court erred in ordering Dassey a new trial under federal habeas corpus law, which can only entitle a defendant to relief if a State fails to properly apply clearly established federal law -- i.e., SCOTUS decisions, -- or if the State clearly errs in its factual determinations on the legal issue in question. Effectively, the Seventh Circuit said Dassey failed to meet either of those burdens and relief wasn't warranted.


Without explanation, SCOTUS denied review. One of Dassey's lawyer, Laura Nirider, said in a statement they would "continue to fight for Brendan Dassey."
Dassey's case does not directly affect Steve Avery since his uncle was convicted in a separate trial. However, with SCOTUS denying review, both Avery's and Dassey's cases have effectively come to an end. That's not to say they may not get back into court somehow, but it looks like all the traditional roads of post-conviction relief have been traveled to no avail.

Recent Posts


social media 28 U.S.C. § 2254 gadsden alabama adnan syed, peyton pruitt constitutional violations OJ Simpson Made in America huntsville state of arizona moving violations LWOP strickland v washington attempted murder sentencing law and policy blog summaries pinson alabama rainbow city alabama apprendi v new jersey boaz alabama steve avery drug trafficking, benjamin todd acton fraud huntsville alabama nicholas hawkins department of justice, netflix animal cruelty kimberly alabama brian fredick lucas lethal injection drugs albertville alabama banville v state mount olive alabama morris alabama negligent homicide alabama law enforcement agency capital offenses drug smuggling decatur alabama concealed carry terell corey mcmullin anniston alabama, calhoun county alabama baltimore city circuit court pruitt v state Guy Terrell Junior car accident dora alabama crime of passion SCOTUS, West Alabama Justice Sotomayor criminal mischief abandonment drug activity Joshua Reese Tracie Todd tarrant alabama dothan alabama fourth amendment hoax destructive devices ex parte briseno constitutional law, US Supreme Court Update st clair county alabama gun control mcwilliams v dunn mulga alabama moore v texas legende v state florence alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing Dylann Roof Easter § 13A-3-23 kidnapping christian guitierez death penalty eighth amendment, narcotics investigation court of criminal appeals trussville alabama breaking and entering Alabaster alabama texas scotus montgomery alabama making a murderer Mike Hubbard home repair fraud clarence thomas Ingmire v State sixth amendment homicide implied consent William Pryor drug crimes endangerment of a child birmingham alabama illegal gun carry judicial override shelby county pell city alabama embezzlement assault hoover alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church limestone county alabama mobile alabama Kay Ivey tuscaloosa alabama Etowah County Alabama, marion county abuse shooting second amendment springville alabama alabama talladega superspeedway capital murder domestic violence Shonda Walker, Samuel Alito court systems, nathan woods alabama criminal law roundup drug seizure bessemer alabama aziz sayyed habeas corpus relief debit card skimming scams the mannequin challenge Jefferson County Alabama mountain brook alabama Thomas Hardiman Donald Trump, court of criminal appeal releases debtor prison shoplifting bomb threat homicide rate ferguson missouri shooting death prostitution sting Rule 32 ring v arizona Woods v State russell calhoun brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix cherokee county alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth warrior alabama bailey v us hanceville alabama npr heflin alabama Eutaw Alabama fairfield alabama, street racing fake kidnapping, illegal gambling Gardendale Alabama serial hall v florida eleventh circuit ruling Fentanyl robberies levins v state kenneth eugene billups pelham alabama midazolam morgan county alabama sexual assault Malone v State lamar county stoves v state foley alabama hurst v florida fultondale alabama church robberies bernard v north dakota keith v state felony assaults CCA update domestic abuse OJ Simpson utah v strieff jerry bohannon operation crackdown campbell v state smith v state avondale alabama christmas shooting identity theft sheffield v state Sardis Alabama greene county alabama abduction Neil Gorsuch brookside alabama beylund v north dakota battles v state minor offenses Hillary Clinton, john earle redfearn IV v state Walker County Alabama madison alabama Alonzo Ephraim executions south carolina ake v oklahoma hurst mandamus burglary Kareem Dacar Gaymon betton v state Glaze v State editorial fort payne alabama Lucky D Arcade criminal justice edwards v arizona brendan dassey Pleasant Grove Alabama adger alabama alfonso morris lethal injection criminal justice reform, blountsville alabama asia mcclain 2016 election, mike gilotti self defense lauderdale county alabama dekalb county alabama Xavier Beasley New York Times eugene lee jones v state armed robbery Adamsville alabama mccalla alabama road rage baldwin county alabama operation bullseye economic growth eric sterling state of alabama murder Tommy Arthur birchfield v north dakota drug possession, parole towles v state sarah koenig department of justice Stephen Breyer unlawful manufacturing drug busts Benn v State arson blount county alabama theft of property brady v maryland public assistance fraud fraudulent checks death penalty, heritage christian university theft cullman alabama gun rights utah supreme court warrantless blood draws underage drinking Marengo County Alabama stanley brent chapman aiding and abetting alabama supreme court capital punishment forced isolation oneonta alabama maryland court of special appeals



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.