CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Supreme Court Won't Hear Appeal of Making A Murderer's Brendan Dassey

J.D. Lloyd - Wednesday, June 27, 2018

Fans of the critically acclaimed, yet divisive Netflix true crime documentary, Making A Murderer, saw what is likely the end of the legal battle for Brendan Dassey, one of the two defendants charged and convicted of the 2005 murder of Teresa Halbach. The United States Supreme Court denied his petition to have that court hear his case.

Dassey, along with with his uncle and main documentary subject Steve Avery, had been convicted in the 2005 murder of Teresa Halbach, a 25-year-old photographer in Manitowoc, Wis. The coverage of his 2007 conviction in the documentary made the 28-year-old especially endearing to viewers as Dassey clearly suffered from intellectual limitations if not outright disability, his confessions were nonsensical at points, and because he had a terrible and (in my opinion) unethical and ineffective attorney at the start of his case. Dassey's lawyers and the filmmakers argued that police investigators improperly coerced his videotaped confession. The 10-part series showed the then-16 year-old Dassey being interviewed by police about the crime with neither a parent nor lawyer present. Dassey's statement was damning to the defense, but defense counsel argued his incriminating statements were coerced and fabricated.

 

In August 2016, a federal judge in the Eastern District of Wisconsin agreed with Dassey's that his statements should have been thrown out. However, the Wisconsin attorney general appealed the decision. The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit eventually ruled by a 4-to-3 vote that the district court erred in ordering Dassey a new trial under federal habeas corpus law, which can only entitle a defendant to relief if a State fails to properly apply clearly established federal law -- i.e., SCOTUS decisions, -- or if the State clearly errs in its factual determinations on the legal issue in question. Effectively, the Seventh Circuit said Dassey failed to meet either of those burdens and relief wasn't warranted.

 

Without explanation, SCOTUS denied review. One of Dassey's lawyer, Laura Nirider, said in a statement they would "continue to fight for Brendan Dassey."
Dassey's case does not directly affect Steve Avery since his uncle was convicted in a separate trial. However, with SCOTUS denying review, both Avery's and Dassey's cases have effectively come to an end. That's not to say they may not get back into court somehow, but it looks like all the traditional roads of post-conviction relief have been traveled to no avail.


Recent Posts


Tags

theft alfonso morris pelham alabama fultondale alabama steve avery capital murder OJ Simpson capital punishment utah v strieff eighth amendment, Kareem Dacar Gaymon criminal justice reform, drug possession, Lucky D Arcade department of justice, Samuel Alito keith v state gun rights ferguson missouri ake v oklahoma moore v texas second amendment hanceville alabama talladega superspeedway peyton pruitt implied consent criminal mischief fairfield alabama, strickland v washington st clair county alabama mike gilotti home repair fraud mccalla alabama Alabaster alabama CCA update bailey v us drug activity foley alabama asia mcclain mulga alabama eleventh circuit ruling illegal gambling battles v state fort payne alabama shoplifting illegal gun carry boaz alabama stanley brent chapman court of criminal appeal releases OJ Simpson Made in America benjamin todd acton towles v state sixth amendment narcotics investigation making a murderer breaking and entering maryland court of special appeals mountain brook alabama clarence thomas Benn v State kenneth eugene billups ex parte briseno stoves v state blountsville alabama Dylann Roof embezzlement robberies identity theft baltimore city circuit court gun control apprendi v new jersey warrantless blood draws abuse Adamsville alabama morgan county alabama scotus Sardis Alabama edwards v arizona sexual assault huntsville alabama netflix homicide rate brian fredick lucas Easter abduction oneonta alabama self defense brookside alabama animal cruelty florence alabama hall v florida Shonda Walker, Eutaw Alabama moving violations texas hoax destructive devices Ingmire v State abandonment alabama law enforcement agency drug smuggling 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Kay Ivey drug busts kidnapping hurst mandamus Tommy Arthur murder prostitution sting LWOP Hillary Clinton, adger alabama shooting limestone county alabama state of arizona sarah koenig § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing betton v state domestic abuse kimberly alabama drug seizure Marengo County Alabama SCOTUS, death penalty constitutional violations alabama criminal law roundup bernard v north dakota debtor prison fourth amendment mobile alabama dora alabama serial springville alabama nicholas hawkins Etowah County Alabama, US Supreme Court Update Gardendale Alabama Xavier Beasley adnan syed, ring v arizona road rage crime of passion lamar county eric sterling Wesley Adam Whitworth heflin alabama court of criminal appeals south carolina assault rainbow city alabama huntsville albertville alabama calhoun county alabama madison alabama armed robbery alabama supreme court cullman alabama New York Times utah supreme court department of justice jerry bohannon editorial trussville alabama state of alabama aziz sayyed parole Malone v State brady v maryland brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix social media beylund v north dakota pinson alabama avondale alabama drug crimes bomb threat death penalty, eugene lee jones v state Jefferson County Alabama Neil Gorsuch heritage christian university church robberies campbell v state mcwilliams v dunn Donald Trump, cherokee county alabama executions hurst v florida fraud decatur alabama habeas corpus relief burglary alabama capital offenses Stephen Breyer minor offenses npr operation bullseye William Pryor criminal justice lauderdale county alabama tuscaloosa alabama birmingham alabama nathan woods Briarwood Presbyterian Church smith v state lethal injection midazolam economic growth West Alabama anniston alabama, birchfield v north dakota concealed carry hoover alabama fraudulent checks lethal injection drugs the mannequin challenge blount county alabama negligent homicide arson aiding and abetting Alonzo Ephraim Glaze v State court systems, Pleasant Grove Alabama brendan dassey debit card skimming scams Justice Sotomayor dekalb county alabama baldwin county alabama dothan alabama mount olive alabama marion county Thomas Hardiman greene county alabama tarrant alabama forced isolation underage drinking pell city alabama russell calhoun Walker County Alabama public assistance fraud Joshua Reese john earle redfearn IV v state legende v state Guy Terrell Junior endangerment of a child operation crackdown 2016 election, Mike Hubbard theft of property shelby county felony assaults shooting death unlawful manufacturing judicial override banville v state warrior alabama Woods v State levins v state bessemer alabama sheffield v state Tracie Todd sentencing law and policy blog summaries terell corey mcmullin § 13A-3-23 morris alabama street racing christmas shooting drug trafficking, Fentanyl domestic violence montgomery alabama constitutional law, fake kidnapping, homicide Rule 32 gadsden alabama attempted murder car accident christian guitierez pruitt v state

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.