CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Supreme Court Won't Hear Appeal of Making A Murderer's Brendan Dassey

J.D. Lloyd - Wednesday, June 27, 2018

Fans of the critically acclaimed, yet divisive Netflix true crime documentary, Making A Murderer, saw what is likely the end of the legal battle for Brendan Dassey, one of the two defendants charged and convicted of the 2005 murder of Teresa Halbach. The United States Supreme Court denied his petition to have that court hear his case.

Dassey, along with with his uncle and main documentary subject Steve Avery, had been convicted in the 2005 murder of Teresa Halbach, a 25-year-old photographer in Manitowoc, Wis. The coverage of his 2007 conviction in the documentary made the 28-year-old especially endearing to viewers as Dassey clearly suffered from intellectual limitations if not outright disability, his confessions were nonsensical at points, and because he had a terrible and (in my opinion) unethical and ineffective attorney at the start of his case. Dassey's lawyers and the filmmakers argued that police investigators improperly coerced his videotaped confession. The 10-part series showed the then-16 year-old Dassey being interviewed by police about the crime with neither a parent nor lawyer present. Dassey's statement was damning to the defense, but defense counsel argued his incriminating statements were coerced and fabricated.


In August 2016, a federal judge in the Eastern District of Wisconsin agreed with Dassey's that his statements should have been thrown out. However, the Wisconsin attorney general appealed the decision. The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit eventually ruled by a 4-to-3 vote that the district court erred in ordering Dassey a new trial under federal habeas corpus law, which can only entitle a defendant to relief if a State fails to properly apply clearly established federal law -- i.e., SCOTUS decisions, -- or if the State clearly errs in its factual determinations on the legal issue in question. Effectively, the Seventh Circuit said Dassey failed to meet either of those burdens and relief wasn't warranted.


Without explanation, SCOTUS denied review. One of Dassey's lawyer, Laura Nirider, said in a statement they would "continue to fight for Brendan Dassey."
Dassey's case does not directly affect Steve Avery since his uncle was convicted in a separate trial. However, with SCOTUS denying review, both Avery's and Dassey's cases have effectively come to an end. That's not to say they may not get back into court somehow, but it looks like all the traditional roads of post-conviction relief have been traveled to no avail.

Recent Posts


armed robbery apprendi v new jersey baltimore city circuit court st clair county alabama dothan alabama eighth amendment, illegal gun carry lamar county church robberies capital punishment kimberly alabama drug smuggling animal cruelty Samuel Alito blount county alabama tuscaloosa alabama LWOP arson pelham alabama operation bullseye Briarwood Presbyterian Church court of criminal appeal releases Kay Ivey Eutaw Alabama brady v maryland hurst mandamus drug trafficking, Pleasant Grove Alabama OJ Simpson Made in America William Pryor huntsville lethal injection operation crackdown moore v texas fairfield alabama, Adamsville alabama christian guitierez pell city alabama economic growth second amendment Thomas Hardiman implied consent netflix death penalty, kenneth eugene billups mountain brook alabama US Supreme Court Update fraudulent checks Fentanyl Woods v State constitutional violations anniston alabama, john earle redfearn IV v state alfonso morris drug seizure adger alabama Benn v State peyton pruitt breaking and entering concealed carry bernard v north dakota robberies cullman alabama ring v arizona sarah koenig oneonta alabama Alonzo Ephraim legende v state marion county bessemer alabama murder shooting editorial hurst v florida 2016 election, parole fultondale alabama Neil Gorsuch towles v state texas court systems, alabama supreme court Sardis Alabama calhoun county alabama eleventh circuit ruling debtor prison drug crimes utah v strieff adnan syed, New York Times jerry bohannon gadsden alabama gun rights ake v oklahoma department of justice Stephen Breyer criminal mischief unlawful manufacturing Mike Hubbard criminal justice reform, maryland court of special appeals street racing OJ Simpson asia mcclain banville v state burglary court of criminal appeals Justice Sotomayor illegal gambling montgomery alabama eugene lee jones v state sheffield v state gun control alabama criminal law roundup nathan woods 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ex parte briseno foley alabama abduction Guy Terrell Junior lauderdale county alabama talladega superspeedway lethal injection drugs road rage Glaze v State morris alabama aziz sayyed fort payne alabama embezzlement executions state of alabama rainbow city alabama mccalla alabama greene county alabama drug possession, sentencing law and policy blog summaries abuse Marengo County Alabama Tommy Arthur mike gilotti dora alabama Shonda Walker, Dylann Roof warrantless blood draws capital offenses state of arizona crime of passion stanley brent chapman mcwilliams v dunn the mannequin challenge heflin alabama madison alabama warrior alabama Joshua Reese aiding and abetting baldwin county alabama beylund v north dakota debit card skimming scams springville alabama terell corey mcmullin stoves v state theft of property homicide underage drinking capital murder birchfield v north dakota hall v florida self defense negligent homicide cherokee county alabama § 13A-3-23 shelby county SCOTUS, edwards v arizona campbell v state Ingmire v State albertville alabama serial prostitution sting bomb threat death penalty habeas corpus relief assault Walker County Alabama kidnapping fraud boaz alabama Lucky D Arcade midazolam minor offenses mobile alabama eric sterling drug activity pinson alabama nicholas hawkins domestic violence West Alabama Xavier Beasley Hillary Clinton, sexual assault npr Wesley Adam Whitworth betton v state steve avery theft decatur alabama Alabaster alabama moving violations felony assaults tarrant alabama criminal justice Malone v State battles v state Kareem Dacar Gaymon russell calhoun brookside alabama hoover alabama christmas shooting brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix keith v state Tracie Todd Jefferson County Alabama levins v state constitutional law, Easter attempted murder fourth amendment sixth amendment Etowah County Alabama, brendan dassey forced isolation abandonment avondale alabama mount olive alabama south carolina Donald Trump, clarence thomas public assistance fraud making a murderer endangerment of a child § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing car accident alabama law enforcement agency ferguson missouri mulga alabama drug busts pruitt v state blountsville alabama home repair fraud Rule 32 huntsville alabama hanceville alabama dekalb county alabama shooting death Gardendale Alabama smith v state hoax destructive devices CCA update morgan county alabama limestone county alabama identity theft strickland v washington birmingham alabama trussville alabama domestic abuse narcotics investigation homicide rate bailey v us fake kidnapping, judicial override alabama utah supreme court social media scotus brian fredick lucas florence alabama department of justice, shoplifting heritage christian university benjamin todd acton



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.