CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Supreme Court Won't Hear Appeal of Making A Murderer's Brendan Dassey

J.D. Lloyd - Wednesday, June 27, 2018

Fans of the critically acclaimed, yet divisive Netflix true crime documentary, Making A Murderer, saw what is likely the end of the legal battle for Brendan Dassey, one of the two defendants charged and convicted of the 2005 murder of Teresa Halbach. The United States Supreme Court denied his petition to have that court hear his case.

Dassey, along with with his uncle and main documentary subject Steve Avery, had been convicted in the 2005 murder of Teresa Halbach, a 25-year-old photographer in Manitowoc, Wis. The coverage of his 2007 conviction in the documentary made the 28-year-old especially endearing to viewers as Dassey clearly suffered from intellectual limitations if not outright disability, his confessions were nonsensical at points, and because he had a terrible and (in my opinion) unethical and ineffective attorney at the start of his case. Dassey's lawyers and the filmmakers argued that police investigators improperly coerced his videotaped confession. The 10-part series showed the then-16 year-old Dassey being interviewed by police about the crime with neither a parent nor lawyer present. Dassey's statement was damning to the defense, but defense counsel argued his incriminating statements were coerced and fabricated.

 

In August 2016, a federal judge in the Eastern District of Wisconsin agreed with Dassey's that his statements should have been thrown out. However, the Wisconsin attorney general appealed the decision. The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit eventually ruled by a 4-to-3 vote that the district court erred in ordering Dassey a new trial under federal habeas corpus law, which can only entitle a defendant to relief if a State fails to properly apply clearly established federal law -- i.e., SCOTUS decisions, -- or if the State clearly errs in its factual determinations on the legal issue in question. Effectively, the Seventh Circuit said Dassey failed to meet either of those burdens and relief wasn't warranted.

 

Without explanation, SCOTUS denied review. One of Dassey's lawyer, Laura Nirider, said in a statement they would "continue to fight for Brendan Dassey."
Dassey's case does not directly affect Steve Avery since his uncle was convicted in a separate trial. However, with SCOTUS denying review, both Avery's and Dassey's cases have effectively come to an end. That's not to say they may not get back into court somehow, but it looks like all the traditional roads of post-conviction relief have been traveled to no avail.


Recent Posts


Tags

pruitt v state alabama law enforcement agency adnan syed, sheffield v state bomb threat texas stanley brent chapman Joshua Reese serial implied consent unlawful manufacturing heritage christian university negligent homicide abduction Briarwood Presbyterian Church concealed carry operation crackdown parole strickland v washington Gardendale Alabama eric sterling brendan dassey operation bullseye clarence thomas warrior alabama alabama criminal law roundup William Pryor Jefferson County Alabama Marengo County Alabama huntsville court of criminal appeal releases department of justice self defense illegal gun carry stoves v state gadsden alabama eugene lee jones v state kenneth eugene billups battles v state hall v florida marion county beylund v north dakota south carolina montgomery alabama adger alabama OJ Simpson Made in America Kareem Dacar Gaymon hoax destructive devices st clair county alabama maryland court of special appeals attempted murder Wesley Adam Whitworth LWOP lauderdale county alabama court of criminal appeals sarah koenig campbell v state fake kidnapping, blountsville alabama habeas corpus relief crime of passion debit card skimming scams peyton pruitt netflix economic growth morris alabama mulga alabama birchfield v north dakota Justice Sotomayor OJ Simpson hanceville alabama terell corey mcmullin russell calhoun talladega superspeedway hurst v florida home repair fraud homicide rate Benn v State sixth amendment car accident Tracie Todd embezzlement Neil Gorsuch constitutional law, nathan woods Pleasant Grove Alabama calhoun county alabama forced isolation warrantless blood draws bailey v us sexual assault underage drinking oneonta alabama abuse Shonda Walker, judicial override hoover alabama alabama supreme court tuscaloosa alabama Rule 32 narcotics investigation eighth amendment, second amendment Easter CCA update robberies § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing aziz sayyed Woods v State Dylann Roof criminal justice reform, Glaze v State ferguson missouri tarrant alabama drug smuggling apprendi v new jersey legende v state fraudulent checks breaking and entering foley alabama keith v state anniston alabama, eleventh circuit ruling utah v strieff smith v state animal cruelty mobile alabama the mannequin challenge dekalb county alabama Fentanyl blount county alabama illegal gambling church robberies domestic violence rainbow city alabama betton v state fraud Adamsville alabama steve avery state of alabama criminal justice homicide editorial ring v arizona gun rights gun control Donald Trump, alabama capital offenses npr capital murder brady v maryland benjamin todd acton shooting death US Supreme Court Update death penalty, fort payne alabama Tommy Arthur Xavier Beasley christian guitierez mcwilliams v dunn fairfield alabama, 2016 election, Samuel Alito minor offenses Walker County Alabama mount olive alabama armed robbery Lucky D Arcade dothan alabama lethal injection drugs shoplifting burglary department of justice, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 pinson alabama trussville alabama Ingmire v State drug seizure moore v texas cullman alabama jerry bohannon abandonment morgan county alabama West Alabama scotus hurst mandamus ex parte briseno Sardis Alabama pelham alabama domestic abuse brookside alabama drug possession, assault lethal injection sentencing law and policy blog summaries madison alabama Etowah County Alabama, identity theft constitutional violations midazolam towles v state avondale alabama baldwin county alabama Guy Terrell Junior capital punishment greene county alabama nicholas hawkins Alonzo Ephraim drug activity birmingham alabama brian fredick lucas dora alabama making a murderer Mike Hubbard felony assaults kimberly alabama theft of property utah supreme court florence alabama bessemer alabama boaz alabama albertville alabama Thomas Hardiman baltimore city circuit court debtor prison murder Kay Ivey huntsville alabama shooting road rage fourth amendment Eutaw Alabama Malone v State drug trafficking, moving violations prostitution sting mccalla alabama heflin alabama fultondale alabama decatur alabama aiding and abetting Stephen Breyer levins v state arson § 13A-3-23 executions Hillary Clinton, death penalty public assistance fraud theft shelby county banville v state mike gilotti drug crimes ake v oklahoma limestone county alabama pell city alabama endangerment of a child criminal mischief edwards v arizona cherokee county alabama john earle redfearn IV v state springville alabama christmas shooting street racing court systems, Alabaster alabama drug busts mountain brook alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix social media lamar county SCOTUS, asia mcclain New York Times alfonso morris kidnapping state of arizona bernard v north dakota

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.