CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeals Decisions - April 2018

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, April 27, 2018

 Pruitt v. State 16-0956

 

 

Pruitt pleaded guilty to two counts of committing a sex act with a student, violations of § 13A-6-81, and two counts of distributing obscene material to a minor, violations of § 13A-12-200.5. These offenses involved 3 students Pruitt formerly taught. Pruitt was a teacher in the Blount County School system. She taught at the Locust Fork High School during the 2012-13 and 2013-14 school years. She taught the three students during this time. Beginning in the 2014-15 school year, Pruitt was transferred to Appalachian High School. During October 2014, she sent Student #1 nude Snapchat pictures, had deviate sexual intercourse with Student #2, and had sexual intercourse with Student #3. For all intents and purposes, the acts were consensual. These facts were stipulated by both sides. Prior to pleading guilty, Pruitt, relying on Lawrence v. Texas, argued that the statutes and charges were unconstitutional as applied to her. AFFIRMED The Court of Criminal Appeals rejected the Lawrence-based argument on the grounds that Lawrence explicitly held that the decision didn’t apply to conduct involving minors. Further, the Court concluded that the State has a legitimate state interest in “prohibiting intimate contact between a teacher and a student.” The Court likewise rejected Pruitt’s “consent” defense since the statute expressly says “consent is not a defense.” Finally, the Court held that the fact that Pruitt did not teach at the same school as the students did not entitle her to relief. The Court also rejected an argument that her violation for unlawful distribution of obscene material to a minor didn’t violate her right to Equal Protection to be free from State intervention in a private relationship with a consulting person. The Court ruled against this argument based on the student being a minor (per § 13A-12-200.1) and previous holdings that the State doesn’t violate Equal Protection concerns by prohibiting sexual contact with minors.
 
Towles v. State CR-15-0699
Towles was convicted of capital murder pursuant to §13A-5-40(a)(15) for killing his girlfriend’s son by hitting him on the buttocks with a piece of lumber. This appealed stemmed from a re-trial after the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed his capital murder conviction and death sentence years back. In the interim, Towles’ girlfriend pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. The girlfriend didn’t testify at trial. Towles’ defense was that she caused the death and then blackmailed him to help her cover up the child’s death. However, the State impeached Towles by discussing how she had pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. REVERSED The Court concluded that the introduction of the girlfriend’s conviction into evidence was improper evidence of Towles’ guilt. The Court also concluded that the trial court’s instruction that “knowledge of the probability of death or great bodily harm is sufficient to constitute murder” impermissibly lessened the State’s burden and undermined the defense’s argument that the killing was, at most, unintentional. Mr. Towles will now go back for his third trial.

 

Betton v. State CR-15-1501
Betton was a juvenile capital defendant seeking re-sentencing under Miller v. Alabama. Here, the circuit court re-sentenced him to LWOP without considering the factors the Alabama Supreme Court announced in Ex parte Henderson. REMANDED The Court held that remand was necessary for the circuit court to enter specific findings under Ex parte Henderson.
 
Battles v. State CR-17-0044
In a prosecution for unlawful possession of a pistol by a forbidden person pursuant to § 13A-11-72(a), Battles waived counsel and represented himself at trial. However, throughout, Battles complained that he didn’t understand the charges against him and complained that he didn’t have the resources necessary to defend his case. REVERSED The Court concluded that while Battles knowingly waived his right to represent himself at trial, the circuit court failed to the factors a court must discuss with a defendant pursuant to Fitzpatrick v. Wainwright, 800 F. 2d 1057 (11th Cir. 1986) and Tomlin v. State, 601 So. 2d 124 (Ala. 1991). Additionally, the court failed to tell Battles he could withdraw the waiver at any time.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

Samuel Alito domestic violence church robberies OJ Simpson editorial avondale alabama embezzlement criminal justice reform, attempted murder 2016 election, Glaze v State drug activity car accident shoplifting christian guitierez Adamsville alabama Alonzo Ephraim Malone v State shelby county homicide Joshua Reese moving violations Gardendale Alabama CCA update springville alabama lamar county nicholas hawkins US Supreme Court Update gadsden alabama endangerment of a child heritage christian university Walker County Alabama social media jerry bohannon abduction banville v state Alabaster alabama second amendment illegal gambling theft Kay Ivey capital murder criminal justice huntsville cullman alabama operation bullseye john earle redfearn IV v state lethal injection aiding and abetting narcotics investigation stanley brent chapman mount olive alabama christmas shooting fourth amendment Lucky D Arcade cherokee county alabama sheffield v state Shonda Walker, economic growth rainbow city alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church utah supreme court bernard v north dakota Kareem Dacar Gaymon bessemer alabama hall v florida habeas corpus relief capital offenses hoover alabama edwards v arizona drug smuggling strickland v washington warrior alabama § 13A-3-23 serial asia mcclain montgomery alabama tarrant alabama SCOTUS, florence alabama drug seizure Etowah County Alabama, sarah koenig Benn v State Woods v State lauderdale county alabama New York Times adnan syed, blountsville alabama dothan alabama fake kidnapping, pinson alabama drug busts death penalty, scotus judicial override tuscaloosa alabama unlawful manufacturing mcwilliams v dunn sixth amendment William Pryor prostitution sting Marengo County Alabama eric sterling foley alabama moore v texas brady v maryland Ingmire v State pelham alabama debtor prison breaking and entering legende v state fraudulent checks Thomas Hardiman implied consent Stephen Breyer birmingham alabama fairfield alabama, battles v state gun rights public assistance fraud kimberly alabama hurst v florida midazolam stoves v state adger alabama towles v state illegal gun carry mike gilotti Tommy Arthur mulga alabama mobile alabama hanceville alabama Fentanyl alabama supreme court executions Donald Trump, ex parte briseno court of criminal appeal releases terell corey mcmullin state of arizona calhoun county alabama fultondale alabama burglary homicide rate mountain brook alabama court of criminal appeals benjamin todd acton self defense debit card skimming scams domestic abuse dora alabama beylund v north dakota Xavier Beasley albertville alabama mccalla alabama madison alabama shooting death road rage aziz sayyed the mannequin challenge bomb threat Pleasant Grove Alabama huntsville alabama abandonment crime of passion minor offenses concealed carry brookside alabama morris alabama robberies marion county oneonta alabama Guy Terrell Junior alabama criminal law roundup assault 28 U.S.C. § 2254 utah v strieff morgan county alabama OJ Simpson Made in America armed robbery dekalb county alabama campbell v state baltimore city circuit court brendan dassey criminal mischief levins v state boaz alabama ring v arizona kidnapping nathan woods sentencing law and policy blog summaries Justice Sotomayor eugene lee jones v state constitutional violations south carolina underage drinking state of alabama Neil Gorsuch drug possession, Jefferson County Alabama alabama law enforcement agency sexual assault apprendi v new jersey eleventh circuit ruling street racing animal cruelty bailey v us st clair county alabama hoax destructive devices netflix clarence thomas making a murderer blount county alabama peyton pruitt department of justice, abuse operation crackdown pruitt v state ferguson missouri warrantless blood draws steve avery limestone county alabama fraud home repair fraud murder talladega superspeedway Easter Wesley Adam Whitworth West Alabama hurst mandamus Tracie Todd brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix Hillary Clinton, greene county alabama decatur alabama heflin alabama smith v state alabama npr Sardis Alabama court systems, drug trafficking, constitutional law, felony assaults parole death penalty Eutaw Alabama anniston alabama, betton v state drug crimes gun control russell calhoun Dylann Roof theft of property ake v oklahoma forced isolation Rule 32 Mike Hubbard pell city alabama texas trussville alabama lethal injection drugs fort payne alabama eighth amendment, maryland court of special appeals baldwin county alabama kenneth eugene billups § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing negligent homicide birchfield v north dakota capital punishment LWOP arson brian fredick lucas alfonso morris shooting keith v state department of justice identity theft

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.