CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeals Decisions - April 2018

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, April 27, 2018

 Pruitt v. State 16-0956

 

 

Pruitt pleaded guilty to two counts of committing a sex act with a student, violations of § 13A-6-81, and two counts of distributing obscene material to a minor, violations of § 13A-12-200.5. These offenses involved 3 students Pruitt formerly taught. Pruitt was a teacher in the Blount County School system. She taught at the Locust Fork High School during the 2012-13 and 2013-14 school years. She taught the three students during this time. Beginning in the 2014-15 school year, Pruitt was transferred to Appalachian High School. During October 2014, she sent Student #1 nude Snapchat pictures, had deviate sexual intercourse with Student #2, and had sexual intercourse with Student #3. For all intents and purposes, the acts were consensual. These facts were stipulated by both sides. Prior to pleading guilty, Pruitt, relying on Lawrence v. Texas, argued that the statutes and charges were unconstitutional as applied to her. AFFIRMED The Court of Criminal Appeals rejected the Lawrence-based argument on the grounds that Lawrence explicitly held that the decision didn’t apply to conduct involving minors. Further, the Court concluded that the State has a legitimate state interest in “prohibiting intimate contact between a teacher and a student.” The Court likewise rejected Pruitt’s “consent” defense since the statute expressly says “consent is not a defense.” Finally, the Court held that the fact that Pruitt did not teach at the same school as the students did not entitle her to relief. The Court also rejected an argument that her violation for unlawful distribution of obscene material to a minor didn’t violate her right to Equal Protection to be free from State intervention in a private relationship with a consulting person. The Court ruled against this argument based on the student being a minor (per § 13A-12-200.1) and previous holdings that the State doesn’t violate Equal Protection concerns by prohibiting sexual contact with minors.
 
Towles v. State CR-15-0699
Towles was convicted of capital murder pursuant to §13A-5-40(a)(15) for killing his girlfriend’s son by hitting him on the buttocks with a piece of lumber. This appealed stemmed from a re-trial after the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed his capital murder conviction and death sentence years back. In the interim, Towles’ girlfriend pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. The girlfriend didn’t testify at trial. Towles’ defense was that she caused the death and then blackmailed him to help her cover up the child’s death. However, the State impeached Towles by discussing how she had pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. REVERSED The Court concluded that the introduction of the girlfriend’s conviction into evidence was improper evidence of Towles’ guilt. The Court also concluded that the trial court’s instruction that “knowledge of the probability of death or great bodily harm is sufficient to constitute murder” impermissibly lessened the State’s burden and undermined the defense’s argument that the killing was, at most, unintentional. Mr. Towles will now go back for his third trial.

 

Betton v. State CR-15-1501
Betton was a juvenile capital defendant seeking re-sentencing under Miller v. Alabama. Here, the circuit court re-sentenced him to LWOP without considering the factors the Alabama Supreme Court announced in Ex parte Henderson. REMANDED The Court held that remand was necessary for the circuit court to enter specific findings under Ex parte Henderson.
 
Battles v. State CR-17-0044
In a prosecution for unlawful possession of a pistol by a forbidden person pursuant to § 13A-11-72(a), Battles waived counsel and represented himself at trial. However, throughout, Battles complained that he didn’t understand the charges against him and complained that he didn’t have the resources necessary to defend his case. REVERSED The Court concluded that while Battles knowingly waived his right to represent himself at trial, the circuit court failed to the factors a court must discuss with a defendant pursuant to Fitzpatrick v. Wainwright, 800 F. 2d 1057 (11th Cir. 1986) and Tomlin v. State, 601 So. 2d 124 (Ala. 1991). Additionally, the court failed to tell Battles he could withdraw the waiver at any time.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

alfonso morris avondale alabama peyton pruitt Hillary Clinton, aziz sayyed edwards v arizona alabama supreme court alabama Woods v State calhoun county alabama dekalb county alabama court of criminal appeal releases morgan county alabama cullman alabama pell city alabama drug seizure huntsville lethal injection hoover alabama heflin alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing Shonda Walker, capital murder 28 U.S.C. § 2254 midazolam drug possession, florence alabama stoves v state gadsden alabama Kay Ivey Easter fourth amendment heritage christian university tuscaloosa alabama executions implied consent greene county alabama shooting public assistance fraud constitutional law, theft mccalla alabama bernard v north dakota OJ Simpson south carolina towles v state hanceville alabama abuse fort payne alabama forced isolation Tommy Arthur battles v state court systems, gun control madison alabama mike gilotti sixth amendment campbell v state hurst mandamus sexual assault keith v state smith v state decatur alabama steve avery West Alabama blountsville alabama fraudulent checks identity theft alabama law enforcement agency trussville alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon Alonzo Ephraim the mannequin challenge bailey v us ferguson missouri baltimore city circuit court prostitution sting drug activity scotus bomb threat hall v florida Xavier Beasley utah v strieff eleventh circuit ruling Justice Sotomayor Malone v State state of alabama Stephen Breyer oneonta alabama montgomery alabama unlawful manufacturing shooting death nathan woods lamar county moving violations asia mcclain Mike Hubbard domestic abuse death penalty, Gardendale Alabama legende v state criminal mischief lethal injection drugs Eutaw Alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church cherokee county alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama brady v maryland adger alabama sheffield v state road rage Ingmire v State mobile alabama kenneth eugene billups judicial override endangerment of a child albertville alabama economic growth making a murderer talladega superspeedway kidnapping operation crackdown capital offenses CCA update nicholas hawkins narcotics investigation robberies New York Times Thomas Hardiman huntsville alabama pinson alabama criminal justice reform, dothan alabama second amendment birmingham alabama animal cruelty debtor prison embezzlement court of criminal appeals street racing morris alabama criminal justice benjamin todd acton jerry bohannon Wesley Adam Whitworth death penalty capital punishment department of justice netflix rainbow city alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix editorial apprendi v new jersey christmas shooting maryland court of special appeals brookside alabama theft of property habeas corpus relief minor offenses strickland v washington kimberly alabama ake v oklahoma sarah koenig ring v arizona dora alabama sentencing law and policy blog summaries self defense Alabaster alabama underage drinking abandonment bessemer alabama operation bullseye Adamsville alabama hoax destructive devices William Pryor hurst v florida Glaze v State department of justice, Joshua Reese abduction SCOTUS, clarence thomas fairfield alabama, fraud anniston alabama, social media murder LWOP stanley brent chapman christian guitierez eugene lee jones v state Guy Terrell Junior eric sterling beylund v north dakota john earle redfearn IV v state aiding and abetting § 13A-3-23 debit card skimming scams mcwilliams v dunn Tracie Todd tarrant alabama moore v texas Walker County Alabama drug busts st clair county alabama Lucky D Arcade OJ Simpson Made in America russell calhoun Etowah County Alabama, drug smuggling pelham alabama domestic violence eighth amendment, warrior alabama marion county blount county alabama npr fake kidnapping, brian fredick lucas car accident Sardis Alabama pruitt v state 2016 election, US Supreme Court Update texas homicide gun rights home repair fraud constitutional violations Samuel Alito attempted murder Rule 32 springville alabama banville v state arson illegal gambling ex parte briseno assault betton v state adnan syed, burglary terell corey mcmullin church robberies boaz alabama parole birchfield v north dakota fultondale alabama felony assaults foley alabama levins v state mount olive alabama Marengo County Alabama brendan dassey Dylann Roof drug trafficking, crime of passion breaking and entering warrantless blood draws shoplifting Fentanyl shelby county alabama criminal law roundup lauderdale county alabama Donald Trump, mountain brook alabama concealed carry limestone county alabama homicide rate utah supreme court illegal gun carry Benn v State mulga alabama drug crimes serial state of arizona negligent homicide Jefferson County Alabama armed robbery baldwin county alabama Neil Gorsuch

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.