CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeals Decisions - April 2018

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, April 27, 2018

 Pruitt v. State 16-0956

 

 

Pruitt pleaded guilty to two counts of committing a sex act with a student, violations of § 13A-6-81, and two counts of distributing obscene material to a minor, violations of § 13A-12-200.5. These offenses involved 3 students Pruitt formerly taught. Pruitt was a teacher in the Blount County School system. She taught at the Locust Fork High School during the 2012-13 and 2013-14 school years. She taught the three students during this time. Beginning in the 2014-15 school year, Pruitt was transferred to Appalachian High School. During October 2014, she sent Student #1 nude Snapchat pictures, had deviate sexual intercourse with Student #2, and had sexual intercourse with Student #3. For all intents and purposes, the acts were consensual. These facts were stipulated by both sides. Prior to pleading guilty, Pruitt, relying on Lawrence v. Texas, argued that the statutes and charges were unconstitutional as applied to her. AFFIRMED The Court of Criminal Appeals rejected the Lawrence-based argument on the grounds that Lawrence explicitly held that the decision didn’t apply to conduct involving minors. Further, the Court concluded that the State has a legitimate state interest in “prohibiting intimate contact between a teacher and a student.” The Court likewise rejected Pruitt’s “consent” defense since the statute expressly says “consent is not a defense.” Finally, the Court held that the fact that Pruitt did not teach at the same school as the students did not entitle her to relief. The Court also rejected an argument that her violation for unlawful distribution of obscene material to a minor didn’t violate her right to Equal Protection to be free from State intervention in a private relationship with a consulting person. The Court ruled against this argument based on the student being a minor (per § 13A-12-200.1) and previous holdings that the State doesn’t violate Equal Protection concerns by prohibiting sexual contact with minors.
 
Towles v. State CR-15-0699
Towles was convicted of capital murder pursuant to §13A-5-40(a)(15) for killing his girlfriend’s son by hitting him on the buttocks with a piece of lumber. This appealed stemmed from a re-trial after the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed his capital murder conviction and death sentence years back. In the interim, Towles’ girlfriend pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. The girlfriend didn’t testify at trial. Towles’ defense was that she caused the death and then blackmailed him to help her cover up the child’s death. However, the State impeached Towles by discussing how she had pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. REVERSED The Court concluded that the introduction of the girlfriend’s conviction into evidence was improper evidence of Towles’ guilt. The Court also concluded that the trial court’s instruction that “knowledge of the probability of death or great bodily harm is sufficient to constitute murder” impermissibly lessened the State’s burden and undermined the defense’s argument that the killing was, at most, unintentional. Mr. Towles will now go back for his third trial.

 

Betton v. State CR-15-1501
Betton was a juvenile capital defendant seeking re-sentencing under Miller v. Alabama. Here, the circuit court re-sentenced him to LWOP without considering the factors the Alabama Supreme Court announced in Ex parte Henderson. REMANDED The Court held that remand was necessary for the circuit court to enter specific findings under Ex parte Henderson.
 
Battles v. State CR-17-0044
In a prosecution for unlawful possession of a pistol by a forbidden person pursuant to § 13A-11-72(a), Battles waived counsel and represented himself at trial. However, throughout, Battles complained that he didn’t understand the charges against him and complained that he didn’t have the resources necessary to defend his case. REVERSED The Court concluded that while Battles knowingly waived his right to represent himself at trial, the circuit court failed to the factors a court must discuss with a defendant pursuant to Fitzpatrick v. Wainwright, 800 F. 2d 1057 (11th Cir. 1986) and Tomlin v. State, 601 So. 2d 124 (Ala. 1991). Additionally, the court failed to tell Battles he could withdraw the waiver at any time.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

CCA update § 13A-3-23 fort payne alabama constitutional law, editorial mike gilotti adnan syed, Adamsville alabama birchfield v north dakota abduction criminal mischief huntsville embezzlement Briarwood Presbyterian Church home repair fraud burglary murder bomb threat aziz sayyed operation bullseye decatur alabama edwards v arizona bailey v us netflix alfonso morris brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix moore v texas brookside alabama south carolina oneonta alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing lethal injection morgan county alabama theft Wesley Adam Whitworth bessemer alabama operation crackdown eighth amendment, minor offenses parole madison alabama the mannequin challenge cullman alabama boaz alabama lamar county drug activity npr maryland court of special appeals car accident asia mcclain heritage christian university fourth amendment gun rights kidnapping abandonment aiding and abetting avondale alabama self defense homicide eleventh circuit ruling campbell v state shelby county sixth amendment levins v state mount olive alabama florence alabama animal cruelty ring v arizona sarah koenig New York Times smith v state Alonzo Ephraim armed robbery fake kidnapping, death penalty, debtor prison eric sterling Sardis Alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 mobile alabama state of arizona fultondale alabama utah v strieff drug crimes concealed carry sheffield v state hall v florida drug busts abuse trussville alabama fraudulent checks court of criminal appeal releases rainbow city alabama brendan dassey ex parte briseno christmas shooting cherokee county alabama Donald Trump, heflin alabama Lucky D Arcade baldwin county alabama blountsville alabama Kay Ivey SCOTUS, drug trafficking, robberies social media Kareem Dacar Gaymon gadsden alabama serial Mike Hubbard court systems, alabama supreme court nicholas hawkins domestic abuse mcwilliams v dunn talladega superspeedway theft of property beylund v north dakota death penalty drug possession, Walker County Alabama lethal injection drugs battles v state benjamin todd acton marion county gun control springville alabama calhoun county alabama Samuel Alito limestone county alabama Dylann Roof homicide rate second amendment brady v maryland habeas corpus relief shooting peyton pruitt shooting death Pleasant Grove Alabama Gardendale Alabama Alabaster alabama greene county alabama forced isolation unlawful manufacturing negligent homicide lauderdale county alabama towles v state Guy Terrell Junior dekalb county alabama huntsville alabama OJ Simpson US Supreme Court Update birmingham alabama attempted murder department of justice, debit card skimming scams blount county alabama public assistance fraud economic growth moving violations kimberly alabama breaking and entering street racing alabama law enforcement agency bernard v north dakota foley alabama dothan alabama Fentanyl illegal gambling christian guitierez identity theft mccalla alabama department of justice pruitt v state prostitution sting criminal justice reform, crime of passion russell calhoun texas betton v state Benn v State Glaze v State warrantless blood draws domestic violence felony assaults pell city alabama underage drinking West Alabama executions tarrant alabama nathan woods stoves v state alabama hoover alabama Jefferson County Alabama baltimore city circuit court brian fredick lucas mountain brook alabama Ingmire v State midazolam Etowah County Alabama, stanley brent chapman anniston alabama, Hillary Clinton, Easter ake v oklahoma capital offenses illegal gun carry hurst v florida Eutaw Alabama Rule 32 Tommy Arthur morris alabama eugene lee jones v state legende v state pinson alabama Thomas Hardiman fairfield alabama, criminal justice Shonda Walker, endangerment of a child adger alabama hanceville alabama arson narcotics investigation capital murder kenneth eugene billups constitutional violations Neil Gorsuch road rage montgomery alabama Stephen Breyer hoax destructive devices Malone v State shoplifting jerry bohannon 2016 election, dora alabama albertville alabama capital punishment st clair county alabama sexual assault William Pryor clarence thomas fraud implied consent mulga alabama judicial override church robberies Joshua Reese john earle redfearn IV v state hurst mandamus ferguson missouri terell corey mcmullin LWOP Marengo County Alabama strickland v washington Woods v State Justice Sotomayor drug smuggling keith v state sentencing law and policy blog summaries utah supreme court steve avery scotus drug seizure making a murderer Tracie Todd pelham alabama Xavier Beasley state of alabama alabama criminal law roundup assault warrior alabama court of criminal appeals tuscaloosa alabama apprendi v new jersey banville v state OJ Simpson Made in America

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.