CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeals Decisions - April 2018

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, April 27, 2018

 Pruitt v. State 16-0956

 

 

Pruitt pleaded guilty to two counts of committing a sex act with a student, violations of § 13A-6-81, and two counts of distributing obscene material to a minor, violations of § 13A-12-200.5. These offenses involved 3 students Pruitt formerly taught. Pruitt was a teacher in the Blount County School system. She taught at the Locust Fork High School during the 2012-13 and 2013-14 school years. She taught the three students during this time. Beginning in the 2014-15 school year, Pruitt was transferred to Appalachian High School. During October 2014, she sent Student #1 nude Snapchat pictures, had deviate sexual intercourse with Student #2, and had sexual intercourse with Student #3. For all intents and purposes, the acts were consensual. These facts were stipulated by both sides. Prior to pleading guilty, Pruitt, relying on Lawrence v. Texas, argued that the statutes and charges were unconstitutional as applied to her. AFFIRMED The Court of Criminal Appeals rejected the Lawrence-based argument on the grounds that Lawrence explicitly held that the decision didn’t apply to conduct involving minors. Further, the Court concluded that the State has a legitimate state interest in “prohibiting intimate contact between a teacher and a student.” The Court likewise rejected Pruitt’s “consent” defense since the statute expressly says “consent is not a defense.” Finally, the Court held that the fact that Pruitt did not teach at the same school as the students did not entitle her to relief. The Court also rejected an argument that her violation for unlawful distribution of obscene material to a minor didn’t violate her right to Equal Protection to be free from State intervention in a private relationship with a consulting person. The Court ruled against this argument based on the student being a minor (per § 13A-12-200.1) and previous holdings that the State doesn’t violate Equal Protection concerns by prohibiting sexual contact with minors.
 
Towles v. State CR-15-0699
Towles was convicted of capital murder pursuant to §13A-5-40(a)(15) for killing his girlfriend’s son by hitting him on the buttocks with a piece of lumber. This appealed stemmed from a re-trial after the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed his capital murder conviction and death sentence years back. In the interim, Towles’ girlfriend pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. The girlfriend didn’t testify at trial. Towles’ defense was that she caused the death and then blackmailed him to help her cover up the child’s death. However, the State impeached Towles by discussing how she had pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. REVERSED The Court concluded that the introduction of the girlfriend’s conviction into evidence was improper evidence of Towles’ guilt. The Court also concluded that the trial court’s instruction that “knowledge of the probability of death or great bodily harm is sufficient to constitute murder” impermissibly lessened the State’s burden and undermined the defense’s argument that the killing was, at most, unintentional. Mr. Towles will now go back for his third trial.

 

Betton v. State CR-15-1501
Betton was a juvenile capital defendant seeking re-sentencing under Miller v. Alabama. Here, the circuit court re-sentenced him to LWOP without considering the factors the Alabama Supreme Court announced in Ex parte Henderson. REMANDED The Court held that remand was necessary for the circuit court to enter specific findings under Ex parte Henderson.
 
Battles v. State CR-17-0044
In a prosecution for unlawful possession of a pistol by a forbidden person pursuant to § 13A-11-72(a), Battles waived counsel and represented himself at trial. However, throughout, Battles complained that he didn’t understand the charges against him and complained that he didn’t have the resources necessary to defend his case. REVERSED The Court concluded that while Battles knowingly waived his right to represent himself at trial, the circuit court failed to the factors a court must discuss with a defendant pursuant to Fitzpatrick v. Wainwright, 800 F. 2d 1057 (11th Cir. 1986) and Tomlin v. State, 601 So. 2d 124 (Ala. 1991). Additionally, the court failed to tell Battles he could withdraw the waiver at any time.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

prostitution sting arson domestic violence domestic abuse Joshua Reese campbell v state Justice Sotomayor bailey v us Eutaw Alabama sarah koenig florence alabama making a murderer mulga alabama kenneth eugene billups smith v state brendan dassey crime of passion peyton pruitt maryland court of special appeals Samuel Alito forced isolation animal cruelty debtor prison Hillary Clinton, eugene lee jones v state keith v state 28 U.S.C. § 2254 avondale alabama operation bullseye texas economic growth homicide christian guitierez Alabaster alabama clarence thomas criminal justice habeas corpus relief midazolam Etowah County Alabama, LWOP battles v state lethal injection second amendment lamar county attempted murder state of alabama embezzlement social media constitutional violations asia mcclain towles v state heflin alabama cullman alabama Marengo County Alabama edwards v arizona madison alabama theft abuse Guy Terrell Junior illegal gambling christmas shooting ex parte briseno brian fredick lucas ake v oklahoma kidnapping court of criminal appeal releases implied consent hurst mandamus baltimore city circuit court mount olive alabama adnan syed, tuscaloosa alabama aiding and abetting criminal justice reform, illegal gun carry Dylann Roof drug activity mountain brook alabama theft of property Rule 32 warrior alabama pelham alabama assault drug trafficking, hoax destructive devices ferguson missouri home repair fraud self defense CCA update blountsville alabama lethal injection drugs breaking and entering shooting death shelby county utah supreme court talladega superspeedway judicial override utah v strieff bessemer alabama unlawful manufacturing New York Times steve avery nicholas hawkins underage drinking hurst v florida decatur alabama department of justice, huntsville armed robbery montgomery alabama warrantless blood draws npr birchfield v north dakota Fentanyl dekalb county alabama banville v state bernard v north dakota alfonso morris Gardendale Alabama eleventh circuit ruling terell corey mcmullin shoplifting executions beylund v north dakota Woods v State gun rights Tracie Todd alabama law enforcement agency Kay Ivey 2016 election, jerry bohannon brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix Alonzo Ephraim sheffield v state Glaze v State greene county alabama OJ Simpson Made in America birmingham alabama lauderdale county alabama stoves v state Xavier Beasley morgan county alabama sexual assault heritage christian university capital punishment ring v arizona Ingmire v State sentencing law and policy blog summaries public assistance fraud Thomas Hardiman court of criminal appeals death penalty, SCOTUS, criminal mischief road rage homicide rate the mannequin challenge drug busts Lucky D Arcade identity theft negligent homicide adger alabama drug smuggling abandonment § 13A-3-23 capital murder oneonta alabama springville alabama moving violations mccalla alabama gadsden alabama fourth amendment Briarwood Presbyterian Church shooting Jefferson County Alabama south carolina state of arizona Neil Gorsuch mike gilotti sixth amendment church robberies fraud trussville alabama brookside alabama hoover alabama murder Wesley Adam Whitworth marion county Adamsville alabama st clair county alabama Sardis Alabama alabama criminal law roundup brady v maryland nathan woods drug possession, benjamin todd acton Mike Hubbard Benn v State mcwilliams v dunn Malone v State serial hall v florida capital offenses hanceville alabama burglary strickland v washington drug seizure foley alabama fairfield alabama, kimberly alabama editorial eighth amendment, mobile alabama car accident fraudulent checks john earle redfearn IV v state tarrant alabama gun control dora alabama alabama supreme court Pleasant Grove Alabama netflix robberies betton v state felony assaults pruitt v state Tommy Arthur pinson alabama constitutional law, apprendi v new jersey legende v state Kareem Dacar Gaymon street racing West Alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing cherokee county alabama William Pryor department of justice endangerment of a child Stephen Breyer death penalty Shonda Walker, drug crimes limestone county alabama rainbow city alabama fake kidnapping, Easter blount county alabama parole albertville alabama Donald Trump, Walker County Alabama operation crackdown US Supreme Court Update concealed carry russell calhoun aziz sayyed calhoun county alabama morris alabama dothan alabama abduction OJ Simpson moore v texas alabama fultondale alabama bomb threat levins v state scotus huntsville alabama stanley brent chapman baldwin county alabama anniston alabama, minor offenses fort payne alabama boaz alabama pell city alabama debit card skimming scams court systems, narcotics investigation eric sterling

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.