CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeals Decisions - April 2018

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, April 27, 2018

 Pruitt v. State 16-0956

 

 

Pruitt pleaded guilty to two counts of committing a sex act with a student, violations of § 13A-6-81, and two counts of distributing obscene material to a minor, violations of § 13A-12-200.5. These offenses involved 3 students Pruitt formerly taught. Pruitt was a teacher in the Blount County School system. She taught at the Locust Fork High School during the 2012-13 and 2013-14 school years. She taught the three students during this time. Beginning in the 2014-15 school year, Pruitt was transferred to Appalachian High School. During October 2014, she sent Student #1 nude Snapchat pictures, had deviate sexual intercourse with Student #2, and had sexual intercourse with Student #3. For all intents and purposes, the acts were consensual. These facts were stipulated by both sides. Prior to pleading guilty, Pruitt, relying on Lawrence v. Texas, argued that the statutes and charges were unconstitutional as applied to her. AFFIRMED The Court of Criminal Appeals rejected the Lawrence-based argument on the grounds that Lawrence explicitly held that the decision didn’t apply to conduct involving minors. Further, the Court concluded that the State has a legitimate state interest in “prohibiting intimate contact between a teacher and a student.” The Court likewise rejected Pruitt’s “consent” defense since the statute expressly says “consent is not a defense.” Finally, the Court held that the fact that Pruitt did not teach at the same school as the students did not entitle her to relief. The Court also rejected an argument that her violation for unlawful distribution of obscene material to a minor didn’t violate her right to Equal Protection to be free from State intervention in a private relationship with a consulting person. The Court ruled against this argument based on the student being a minor (per § 13A-12-200.1) and previous holdings that the State doesn’t violate Equal Protection concerns by prohibiting sexual contact with minors.
 
Towles v. State CR-15-0699
Towles was convicted of capital murder pursuant to §13A-5-40(a)(15) for killing his girlfriend’s son by hitting him on the buttocks with a piece of lumber. This appealed stemmed from a re-trial after the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed his capital murder conviction and death sentence years back. In the interim, Towles’ girlfriend pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. The girlfriend didn’t testify at trial. Towles’ defense was that she caused the death and then blackmailed him to help her cover up the child’s death. However, the State impeached Towles by discussing how she had pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. REVERSED The Court concluded that the introduction of the girlfriend’s conviction into evidence was improper evidence of Towles’ guilt. The Court also concluded that the trial court’s instruction that “knowledge of the probability of death or great bodily harm is sufficient to constitute murder” impermissibly lessened the State’s burden and undermined the defense’s argument that the killing was, at most, unintentional. Mr. Towles will now go back for his third trial.

 

Betton v. State CR-15-1501
Betton was a juvenile capital defendant seeking re-sentencing under Miller v. Alabama. Here, the circuit court re-sentenced him to LWOP without considering the factors the Alabama Supreme Court announced in Ex parte Henderson. REMANDED The Court held that remand was necessary for the circuit court to enter specific findings under Ex parte Henderson.
 
Battles v. State CR-17-0044
In a prosecution for unlawful possession of a pistol by a forbidden person pursuant to § 13A-11-72(a), Battles waived counsel and represented himself at trial. However, throughout, Battles complained that he didn’t understand the charges against him and complained that he didn’t have the resources necessary to defend his case. REVERSED The Court concluded that while Battles knowingly waived his right to represent himself at trial, the circuit court failed to the factors a court must discuss with a defendant pursuant to Fitzpatrick v. Wainwright, 800 F. 2d 1057 (11th Cir. 1986) and Tomlin v. State, 601 So. 2d 124 (Ala. 1991). Additionally, the court failed to tell Battles he could withdraw the waiver at any time.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

street racing Donald Trump, shooting death animal cruelty death penalty Woods v State pruitt v state burglary steve avery shelby county fraud pelham alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama brady v maryland Xavier Beasley fourth amendment jerry bohannon Malone v State executions Marengo County Alabama arson homicide rate aziz sayyed benjamin todd acton adger alabama birchfield v north dakota SCOTUS, negligent homicide home repair fraud john earle redfearn IV v state morris alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon Walker County Alabama CCA update alabama law enforcement agency hurst v florida alabama stanley brent chapman making a murderer aiding and abetting campbell v state eleventh circuit ruling constitutional law, utah supreme court drug activity battles v state hoax destructive devices limestone county alabama narcotics investigation department of justice, gadsden alabama Guy Terrell Junior eighth amendment, capital offenses criminal justice reform, self defense drug trafficking, embezzlement keith v state shooting gun rights attempted murder fraudulent checks court systems, brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix sexual assault Gardendale Alabama abuse baltimore city circuit court dora alabama criminal mischief mountain brook alabama Easter minor offenses drug smuggling lauderdale county alabama Tommy Arthur domestic abuse moving violations warrantless blood draws domestic violence criminal justice Justice Sotomayor Thomas Hardiman nicholas hawkins smith v state bailey v us fairfield alabama, mulga alabama the mannequin challenge Glaze v State cullman alabama tuscaloosa alabama clarence thomas heritage christian university Stephen Breyer midazolam Hillary Clinton, peyton pruitt LWOP Tracie Todd alabama supreme court court of criminal appeals christian guitierez decatur alabama second amendment alabama criminal law roundup Shonda Walker, Lucky D Arcade alfonso morris Rule 32 fake kidnapping, forced isolation death penalty, marion county albertville alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing Neil Gorsuch pinson alabama scotus road rage asia mcclain dekalb county alabama Etowah County Alabama, assault strickland v washington netflix judicial override abandonment legende v state West Alabama abduction betton v state operation crackdown pell city alabama public assistance fraud murder fultondale alabama christmas shooting south carolina social media Alonzo Ephraim department of justice warrior alabama endangerment of a child banville v state tarrant alabama baldwin county alabama terell corey mcmullin underage drinking texas talladega superspeedway armed robbery breaking and entering kidnapping operation bullseye capital punishment prostitution sting mcwilliams v dunn Mike Hubbard Jefferson County Alabama stoves v state mike gilotti bomb threat levins v state unlawful manufacturing state of arizona Dylann Roof editorial sentencing law and policy blog summaries William Pryor OJ Simpson parole felony assaults ake v oklahoma homicide hanceville alabama sixth amendment utah v strieff capital murder habeas corpus relief ring v arizona OJ Simpson Made in America ex parte briseno drug crimes concealed carry huntsville alabama debtor prison church robberies drug possession, Samuel Alito identity theft Adamsville alabama calhoun county alabama crime of passion edwards v arizona nathan woods 2016 election, Fentanyl Eutaw Alabama moore v texas lethal injection drugs Ingmire v State beylund v north dakota hall v florida kenneth eugene billups dothan alabama theft of property mobile alabama st clair county alabama robberies avondale alabama illegal gun carry shoplifting 28 U.S.C. § 2254 anniston alabama, Benn v State heflin alabama blount county alabama brian fredick lucas Joshua Reese illegal gambling boaz alabama implied consent constitutional violations apprendi v new jersey blountsville alabama cherokee county alabama state of alabama lamar county US Supreme Court Update hurst mandamus adnan syed, madison alabama sheffield v state New York Times fort payne alabama drug busts Sardis Alabama greene county alabama bernard v north dakota foley alabama sarah koenig court of criminal appeal releases birmingham alabama ferguson missouri huntsville brookside alabama morgan county alabama rainbow city alabama oneonta alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church gun control Wesley Adam Whitworth kimberly alabama bessemer alabama serial mccalla alabama montgomery alabama brendan dassey eric sterling maryland court of special appeals eugene lee jones v state russell calhoun Alabaster alabama § 13A-3-23 car accident debit card skimming scams trussville alabama npr drug seizure mount olive alabama springville alabama hoover alabama towles v state florence alabama Kay Ivey theft economic growth lethal injection

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.