CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeals Decisions - April 2018

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, April 27, 2018

 Pruitt v. State 16-0956

 

 

Pruitt pleaded guilty to two counts of committing a sex act with a student, violations of § 13A-6-81, and two counts of distributing obscene material to a minor, violations of § 13A-12-200.5. These offenses involved 3 students Pruitt formerly taught. Pruitt was a teacher in the Blount County School system. She taught at the Locust Fork High School during the 2012-13 and 2013-14 school years. She taught the three students during this time. Beginning in the 2014-15 school year, Pruitt was transferred to Appalachian High School. During October 2014, she sent Student #1 nude Snapchat pictures, had deviate sexual intercourse with Student #2, and had sexual intercourse with Student #3. For all intents and purposes, the acts were consensual. These facts were stipulated by both sides. Prior to pleading guilty, Pruitt, relying on Lawrence v. Texas, argued that the statutes and charges were unconstitutional as applied to her. AFFIRMED The Court of Criminal Appeals rejected the Lawrence-based argument on the grounds that Lawrence explicitly held that the decision didn’t apply to conduct involving minors. Further, the Court concluded that the State has a legitimate state interest in “prohibiting intimate contact between a teacher and a student.” The Court likewise rejected Pruitt’s “consent” defense since the statute expressly says “consent is not a defense.” Finally, the Court held that the fact that Pruitt did not teach at the same school as the students did not entitle her to relief. The Court also rejected an argument that her violation for unlawful distribution of obscene material to a minor didn’t violate her right to Equal Protection to be free from State intervention in a private relationship with a consulting person. The Court ruled against this argument based on the student being a minor (per § 13A-12-200.1) and previous holdings that the State doesn’t violate Equal Protection concerns by prohibiting sexual contact with minors.
 
Towles v. State CR-15-0699
Towles was convicted of capital murder pursuant to §13A-5-40(a)(15) for killing his girlfriend’s son by hitting him on the buttocks with a piece of lumber. This appealed stemmed from a re-trial after the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed his capital murder conviction and death sentence years back. In the interim, Towles’ girlfriend pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. The girlfriend didn’t testify at trial. Towles’ defense was that she caused the death and then blackmailed him to help her cover up the child’s death. However, the State impeached Towles by discussing how she had pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. REVERSED The Court concluded that the introduction of the girlfriend’s conviction into evidence was improper evidence of Towles’ guilt. The Court also concluded that the trial court’s instruction that “knowledge of the probability of death or great bodily harm is sufficient to constitute murder” impermissibly lessened the State’s burden and undermined the defense’s argument that the killing was, at most, unintentional. Mr. Towles will now go back for his third trial.

 

Betton v. State CR-15-1501
Betton was a juvenile capital defendant seeking re-sentencing under Miller v. Alabama. Here, the circuit court re-sentenced him to LWOP without considering the factors the Alabama Supreme Court announced in Ex parte Henderson. REMANDED The Court held that remand was necessary for the circuit court to enter specific findings under Ex parte Henderson.
 
Battles v. State CR-17-0044
In a prosecution for unlawful possession of a pistol by a forbidden person pursuant to § 13A-11-72(a), Battles waived counsel and represented himself at trial. However, throughout, Battles complained that he didn’t understand the charges against him and complained that he didn’t have the resources necessary to defend his case. REVERSED The Court concluded that while Battles knowingly waived his right to represent himself at trial, the circuit court failed to the factors a court must discuss with a defendant pursuant to Fitzpatrick v. Wainwright, 800 F. 2d 1057 (11th Cir. 1986) and Tomlin v. State, 601 So. 2d 124 (Ala. 1991). Additionally, the court failed to tell Battles he could withdraw the waiver at any time.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

ake v oklahoma lauderdale county alabama debtor prison serial peyton pruitt capital murder Ingmire v State morgan county alabama clarence thomas Malone v State fraudulent checks heritage christian university attempted murder st clair county alabama LWOP mulga alabama fake kidnapping, identity theft florence alabama cherokee county alabama Alonzo Ephraim criminal mischief OJ Simpson Jefferson County Alabama calhoun county alabama drug seizure apprendi v new jersey Tracie Todd bernard v north dakota legende v state economic growth mount olive alabama drug activity brookside alabama constitutional violations alabama heflin alabama sexual assault department of justice parole gun rights springville alabama battles v state theft of property gadsden alabama christian guitierez ex parte briseno aiding and abetting Etowah County Alabama, Donald Trump, § 13A-3-23 utah supreme court strickland v washington hanceville alabama npr murder avondale alabama abduction US Supreme Court Update capital offenses breaking and entering ring v arizona mccalla alabama making a murderer Mike Hubbard albertville alabama eric sterling tarrant alabama russell calhoun alabama criminal law roundup netflix banville v state brendan dassey tuscaloosa alabama baltimore city circuit court talladega superspeedway alfonso morris birmingham alabama limestone county alabama cullman alabama kidnapping south carolina social media death penalty drug possession, domestic violence pinson alabama fourth amendment Justice Sotomayor Easter Adamsville alabama blountsville alabama Lucky D Arcade shoplifting sheffield v state Thomas Hardiman narcotics investigation christmas shooting assault debit card skimming scams criminal justice reform, drug smuggling hurst v florida Kay Ivey the mannequin challenge pelham alabama dothan alabama Woods v State criminal justice Fentanyl boaz alabama oneonta alabama smith v state Marengo County Alabama embezzlement OJ Simpson Made in America Xavier Beasley eighth amendment, hoax destructive devices bessemer alabama fort payne alabama fairfield alabama, nathan woods Benn v State greene county alabama morris alabama West Alabama alabama supreme court pell city alabama rainbow city alabama shooting brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix campbell v state executions anniston alabama, marion county steve avery huntsville alabama adger alabama drug trafficking, endangerment of a child warrantless blood draws Tommy Arthur jerry bohannon constitutional law, betton v state bomb threat § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing homicide madison alabama home repair fraud robberies pruitt v state aziz sayyed kenneth eugene billups armed robbery Briarwood Presbyterian Church eugene lee jones v state dekalb county alabama drug crimes street racing implied consent brian fredick lucas illegal gun carry Gardendale Alabama huntsville sentencing law and policy blog summaries shooting death beylund v north dakota death penalty, abandonment nicholas hawkins drug busts illegal gambling decatur alabama adnan syed, mike gilotti underage drinking court of criminal appeal releases benjamin todd acton mountain brook alabama negligent homicide public assistance fraud hurst mandamus hall v florida baldwin county alabama abuse department of justice, felony assaults car accident unlawful manufacturing Kareem Dacar Gaymon Sardis Alabama hoover alabama SCOTUS, sixth amendment scotus arson editorial Walker County Alabama homicide rate utah v strieff maryland court of special appeals lamar county foley alabama towles v state eleventh circuit ruling midazolam warrior alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth crime of passion operation bullseye theft capital punishment trussville alabama animal cruelty keith v state asia mcclain minor offenses judicial override gun control road rage bailey v us Stephen Breyer Glaze v State terell corey mcmullin concealed carry domestic abuse court systems, shelby county second amendment fraud brady v maryland mobile alabama CCA update ferguson missouri forced isolation john earle redfearn IV v state fultondale alabama 2016 election, Neil Gorsuch alabama law enforcement agency Eutaw Alabama moving violations court of criminal appeals Rule 32 stanley brent chapman Samuel Alito Alabaster alabama New York Times moore v texas dora alabama edwards v arizona texas state of alabama kimberly alabama Shonda Walker, Guy Terrell Junior burglary montgomery alabama church robberies birchfield v north dakota lethal injection drugs Dylann Roof Hillary Clinton, blount county alabama prostitution sting 28 U.S.C. § 2254 self defense William Pryor Pleasant Grove Alabama stoves v state habeas corpus relief Joshua Reese state of arizona levins v state sarah koenig operation crackdown mcwilliams v dunn lethal injection

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.