CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeals Decisions - April 2018

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, April 27, 2018

 Pruitt v. State 16-0956



Pruitt pleaded guilty to two counts of committing a sex act with a student, violations of § 13A-6-81, and two counts of distributing obscene material to a minor, violations of § 13A-12-200.5. These offenses involved 3 students Pruitt formerly taught. Pruitt was a teacher in the Blount County School system. She taught at the Locust Fork High School during the 2012-13 and 2013-14 school years. She taught the three students during this time. Beginning in the 2014-15 school year, Pruitt was transferred to Appalachian High School. During October 2014, she sent Student #1 nude Snapchat pictures, had deviate sexual intercourse with Student #2, and had sexual intercourse with Student #3. For all intents and purposes, the acts were consensual. These facts were stipulated by both sides. Prior to pleading guilty, Pruitt, relying on Lawrence v. Texas, argued that the statutes and charges were unconstitutional as applied to her. AFFIRMED The Court of Criminal Appeals rejected the Lawrence-based argument on the grounds that Lawrence explicitly held that the decision didn’t apply to conduct involving minors. Further, the Court concluded that the State has a legitimate state interest in “prohibiting intimate contact between a teacher and a student.” The Court likewise rejected Pruitt’s “consent” defense since the statute expressly says “consent is not a defense.” Finally, the Court held that the fact that Pruitt did not teach at the same school as the students did not entitle her to relief. The Court also rejected an argument that her violation for unlawful distribution of obscene material to a minor didn’t violate her right to Equal Protection to be free from State intervention in a private relationship with a consulting person. The Court ruled against this argument based on the student being a minor (per § 13A-12-200.1) and previous holdings that the State doesn’t violate Equal Protection concerns by prohibiting sexual contact with minors.
Towles v. State CR-15-0699
Towles was convicted of capital murder pursuant to §13A-5-40(a)(15) for killing his girlfriend’s son by hitting him on the buttocks with a piece of lumber. This appealed stemmed from a re-trial after the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed his capital murder conviction and death sentence years back. In the interim, Towles’ girlfriend pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. The girlfriend didn’t testify at trial. Towles’ defense was that she caused the death and then blackmailed him to help her cover up the child’s death. However, the State impeached Towles by discussing how she had pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. REVERSED The Court concluded that the introduction of the girlfriend’s conviction into evidence was improper evidence of Towles’ guilt. The Court also concluded that the trial court’s instruction that “knowledge of the probability of death or great bodily harm is sufficient to constitute murder” impermissibly lessened the State’s burden and undermined the defense’s argument that the killing was, at most, unintentional. Mr. Towles will now go back for his third trial.


Betton v. State CR-15-1501
Betton was a juvenile capital defendant seeking re-sentencing under Miller v. Alabama. Here, the circuit court re-sentenced him to LWOP without considering the factors the Alabama Supreme Court announced in Ex parte Henderson. REMANDED The Court held that remand was necessary for the circuit court to enter specific findings under Ex parte Henderson.
Battles v. State CR-17-0044
In a prosecution for unlawful possession of a pistol by a forbidden person pursuant to § 13A-11-72(a), Battles waived counsel and represented himself at trial. However, throughout, Battles complained that he didn’t understand the charges against him and complained that he didn’t have the resources necessary to defend his case. REVERSED The Court concluded that while Battles knowingly waived his right to represent himself at trial, the circuit court failed to the factors a court must discuss with a defendant pursuant to Fitzpatrick v. Wainwright, 800 F. 2d 1057 (11th Cir. 1986) and Tomlin v. State, 601 So. 2d 124 (Ala. 1991). Additionally, the court failed to tell Battles he could withdraw the waiver at any time.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


heflin alabama adnan syed, dora alabama state of alabama avondale alabama mcwilliams v dunn stoves v state battles v state hanceville alabama sixth amendment drug possession, albertville alabama Sardis Alabama Samuel Alito minor offenses beylund v north dakota brady v maryland npr apprendi v new jersey springville alabama morris alabama abduction christian guitierez alfonso morris death penalty limestone county alabama making a murderer attempted murder bailey v us Stephen Breyer drug trafficking, Easter endangerment of a child embezzlement asia mcclain dekalb county alabama second amendment greene county alabama fort payne alabama utah supreme court aiding and abetting ex parte briseno edwards v arizona fultondale alabama Justice Sotomayor home repair fraud hoax destructive devices cullman alabama road rage bomb threat drug smuggling domestic abuse breaking and entering Woods v State Rule 32 mccalla alabama sarah koenig Mike Hubbard Ingmire v State bessemer alabama constitutional law, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 unlawful manufacturing terell corey mcmullin self defense drug activity texas Donald Trump, murder sentencing law and policy blog summaries kimberly alabama alabama trussville alabama state of arizona sheffield v state fairfield alabama, Alonzo Ephraim abuse illegal gun carry midazolam Adamsville alabama editorial church robberies narcotics investigation marion county morgan county alabama pelham alabama utah v strieff hall v florida rainbow city alabama steve avery peyton pruitt lamar county constitutional violations Benn v State Joshua Reese ring v arizona brookside alabama kenneth eugene billups criminal mischief warrior alabama keith v state parole jerry bohannon § 13A-3-23 christmas shooting sexual assault benjamin todd acton theft drug seizure eric sterling public assistance fraud West Alabama Alabaster alabama operation bullseye Dylann Roof Shonda Walker, alabama criminal law roundup Thomas Hardiman armed robbery court systems, SCOTUS, banville v state baltimore city circuit court florence alabama theft of property fake kidnapping, strickland v washington Fentanyl 2016 election, smith v state pinson alabama alabama supreme court Xavier Beasley heritage christian university huntsville ferguson missouri fourth amendment netflix blountsville alabama tarrant alabama felony assaults capital punishment Wesley Adam Whitworth capital offenses economic growth moving violations mobile alabama pruitt v state Jefferson County Alabama ake v oklahoma drug crimes mount olive alabama car accident Eutaw Alabama lethal injection drugs debit card skimming scams crime of passion concealed carry underage drinking Etowah County Alabama, negligent homicide William Pryor Kay Ivey assault drug busts mulga alabama Lucky D Arcade calhoun county alabama illegal gambling court of criminal appeal releases Gardendale Alabama implied consent arson homicide rate decatur alabama shoplifting hoover alabama department of justice, court of criminal appeals alabama law enforcement agency john earle redfearn IV v state capital murder the mannequin challenge street racing burglary OJ Simpson Made in America clarence thomas Briarwood Presbyterian Church shooting abandonment brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix aziz sayyed st clair county alabama animal cruelty blount county alabama campbell v state adger alabama eighth amendment, nathan woods mountain brook alabama legende v state hurst v florida bernard v north dakota identity theft criminal justice baldwin county alabama shelby county gun rights Tommy Arthur pell city alabama Glaze v State robberies tuscaloosa alabama eleventh circuit ruling mike gilotti Hillary Clinton, stanley brent chapman criminal justice reform, nicholas hawkins Tracie Todd social media russell calhoun serial madison alabama Marengo County Alabama New York Times Neil Gorsuch Kareem Dacar Gaymon executions brendan dassey oneonta alabama habeas corpus relief fraudulent checks south carolina levins v state homicide kidnapping Pleasant Grove Alabama department of justice lethal injection fraud eugene lee jones v state operation crackdown forced isolation death penalty, OJ Simpson birchfield v north dakota towles v state birmingham alabama domestic violence prostitution sting Malone v State gun control debtor prison cherokee county alabama gadsden alabama huntsville alabama anniston alabama, § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing LWOP betton v state foley alabama Guy Terrell Junior scotus judicial override dothan alabama hurst mandamus brian fredick lucas moore v texas boaz alabama CCA update lauderdale county alabama US Supreme Court Update montgomery alabama talladega superspeedway warrantless blood draws Walker County Alabama shooting death maryland court of special appeals



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.