CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeals Decisions - April 2018

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, April 27, 2018

 Pruitt v. State 16-0956

 

 

Pruitt pleaded guilty to two counts of committing a sex act with a student, violations of § 13A-6-81, and two counts of distributing obscene material to a minor, violations of § 13A-12-200.5. These offenses involved 3 students Pruitt formerly taught. Pruitt was a teacher in the Blount County School system. She taught at the Locust Fork High School during the 2012-13 and 2013-14 school years. She taught the three students during this time. Beginning in the 2014-15 school year, Pruitt was transferred to Appalachian High School. During October 2014, she sent Student #1 nude Snapchat pictures, had deviate sexual intercourse with Student #2, and had sexual intercourse with Student #3. For all intents and purposes, the acts were consensual. These facts were stipulated by both sides. Prior to pleading guilty, Pruitt, relying on Lawrence v. Texas, argued that the statutes and charges were unconstitutional as applied to her. AFFIRMED The Court of Criminal Appeals rejected the Lawrence-based argument on the grounds that Lawrence explicitly held that the decision didn’t apply to conduct involving minors. Further, the Court concluded that the State has a legitimate state interest in “prohibiting intimate contact between a teacher and a student.” The Court likewise rejected Pruitt’s “consent” defense since the statute expressly says “consent is not a defense.” Finally, the Court held that the fact that Pruitt did not teach at the same school as the students did not entitle her to relief. The Court also rejected an argument that her violation for unlawful distribution of obscene material to a minor didn’t violate her right to Equal Protection to be free from State intervention in a private relationship with a consulting person. The Court ruled against this argument based on the student being a minor (per § 13A-12-200.1) and previous holdings that the State doesn’t violate Equal Protection concerns by prohibiting sexual contact with minors.
 
Towles v. State CR-15-0699
Towles was convicted of capital murder pursuant to §13A-5-40(a)(15) for killing his girlfriend’s son by hitting him on the buttocks with a piece of lumber. This appealed stemmed from a re-trial after the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed his capital murder conviction and death sentence years back. In the interim, Towles’ girlfriend pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. The girlfriend didn’t testify at trial. Towles’ defense was that she caused the death and then blackmailed him to help her cover up the child’s death. However, the State impeached Towles by discussing how she had pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. REVERSED The Court concluded that the introduction of the girlfriend’s conviction into evidence was improper evidence of Towles’ guilt. The Court also concluded that the trial court’s instruction that “knowledge of the probability of death or great bodily harm is sufficient to constitute murder” impermissibly lessened the State’s burden and undermined the defense’s argument that the killing was, at most, unintentional. Mr. Towles will now go back for his third trial.

 

Betton v. State CR-15-1501
Betton was a juvenile capital defendant seeking re-sentencing under Miller v. Alabama. Here, the circuit court re-sentenced him to LWOP without considering the factors the Alabama Supreme Court announced in Ex parte Henderson. REMANDED The Court held that remand was necessary for the circuit court to enter specific findings under Ex parte Henderson.
 
Battles v. State CR-17-0044
In a prosecution for unlawful possession of a pistol by a forbidden person pursuant to § 13A-11-72(a), Battles waived counsel and represented himself at trial. However, throughout, Battles complained that he didn’t understand the charges against him and complained that he didn’t have the resources necessary to defend his case. REVERSED The Court concluded that while Battles knowingly waived his right to represent himself at trial, the circuit court failed to the factors a court must discuss with a defendant pursuant to Fitzpatrick v. Wainwright, 800 F. 2d 1057 (11th Cir. 1986) and Tomlin v. State, 601 So. 2d 124 (Ala. 1991). Additionally, the court failed to tell Battles he could withdraw the waiver at any time.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

state of alabama pruitt v state crime of passion drug smuggling mobile alabama capital murder car accident fake kidnapping, Walker County Alabama editorial court systems, Rule 32 midazolam foley alabama illegal gun carry steve avery Guy Terrell Junior nathan woods birmingham alabama clarence thomas stanley brent chapman cullman alabama lauderdale county alabama narcotics investigation court of criminal appeals warrantless blood draws gadsden alabama eugene lee jones v state sexual assault Neil Gorsuch endangerment of a child operation crackdown baldwin county alabama ring v arizona maryland court of special appeals Jefferson County Alabama baltimore city circuit court nicholas hawkins fairfield alabama, forced isolation calhoun county alabama huntsville criminal justice aiding and abetting gun rights hoax destructive devices second amendment homicide parole bomb threat assault albertville alabama abandonment felony assaults aziz sayyed US Supreme Court Update npr drug busts state of arizona abuse levins v state brookside alabama boaz alabama kidnapping drug seizure criminal justice reform, fraud Joshua Reese armed robbery implied consent keith v state anniston alabama, fort payne alabama Sardis Alabama arson underage drinking eleventh circuit ruling eric sterling Stephen Breyer hurst v florida constitutional law, unlawful manufacturing capital offenses drug crimes capital punishment Gardendale Alabama limestone county alabama drug activity adnan syed, LWOP blount county alabama utah supreme court Kay Ivey Tommy Arthur marion county lamar county identity theft Donald Trump, mulga alabama morgan county alabama mcwilliams v dunn William Pryor Ingmire v State fultondale alabama netflix death penalty, hall v florida criminal mischief warrior alabama hoover alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon bessemer alabama legende v state SCOTUS, russell calhoun Alonzo Ephraim serial Alabaster alabama utah v strieff animal cruelty Mike Hubbard pinson alabama Thomas Hardiman negligent homicide death penalty theft of property 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Eutaw Alabama rainbow city alabama birchfield v north dakota hanceville alabama domestic abuse Pleasant Grove Alabama pell city alabama decatur alabama ex parte briseno embezzlement bailey v us burglary Easter bernard v north dakota florence alabama talladega superspeedway debtor prison ferguson missouri moore v texas dekalb county alabama morris alabama operation bullseye breaking and entering kenneth eugene billups public assistance fraud making a murderer West Alabama Woods v State economic growth gun control Shonda Walker, abduction madison alabama moving violations sheffield v state domestic violence theft sarah koenig Fentanyl ake v oklahoma concealed carry Malone v State 2016 election, smith v state alabama criminal law roundup mountain brook alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth homicide rate shoplifting battles v state attempted murder church robberies Glaze v State murder jerry bohannon department of justice, Hillary Clinton, christmas shooting greene county alabama eighth amendment, Adamsville alabama alabama supreme court habeas corpus relief st clair county alabama New York Times beylund v north dakota tarrant alabama strickland v washington springville alabama tuscaloosa alabama terell corey mcmullin edwards v arizona Etowah County Alabama, court of criminal appeal releases oneonta alabama avondale alabama Samuel Alito texas benjamin todd acton adger alabama banville v state brian fredick lucas self defense stoves v state shooting death Marengo County Alabama fourth amendment street racing christian guitierez asia mcclain Dylann Roof towles v state shooting apprendi v new jersey betton v state OJ Simpson Made in America sixth amendment illegal gambling heflin alabama Justice Sotomayor hurst mandamus minor offenses brendan dassey § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing mccalla alabama department of justice Lucky D Arcade drug trafficking, alabama dora alabama shelby county montgomery alabama lethal injection drugs Benn v State dothan alabama kimberly alabama CCA update prostitution sting debit card skimming scams OJ Simpson § 13A-3-23 scotus home repair fraud robberies alabama law enforcement agency trussville alabama the mannequin challenge peyton pruitt Tracie Todd blountsville alabama road rage heritage christian university drug possession, mount olive alabama social media Xavier Beasley brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix mike gilotti brady v maryland alfonso morris executions huntsville alabama campbell v state constitutional violations john earle redfearn IV v state cherokee county alabama pelham alabama sentencing law and policy blog summaries south carolina fraudulent checks judicial override Briarwood Presbyterian Church lethal injection

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.