CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeals Decisions - April 2018

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, April 27, 2018

 Pruitt v. State 16-0956

 

 

Pruitt pleaded guilty to two counts of committing a sex act with a student, violations of § 13A-6-81, and two counts of distributing obscene material to a minor, violations of § 13A-12-200.5. These offenses involved 3 students Pruitt formerly taught. Pruitt was a teacher in the Blount County School system. She taught at the Locust Fork High School during the 2012-13 and 2013-14 school years. She taught the three students during this time. Beginning in the 2014-15 school year, Pruitt was transferred to Appalachian High School. During October 2014, she sent Student #1 nude Snapchat pictures, had deviate sexual intercourse with Student #2, and had sexual intercourse with Student #3. For all intents and purposes, the acts were consensual. These facts were stipulated by both sides. Prior to pleading guilty, Pruitt, relying on Lawrence v. Texas, argued that the statutes and charges were unconstitutional as applied to her. AFFIRMED The Court of Criminal Appeals rejected the Lawrence-based argument on the grounds that Lawrence explicitly held that the decision didn’t apply to conduct involving minors. Further, the Court concluded that the State has a legitimate state interest in “prohibiting intimate contact between a teacher and a student.” The Court likewise rejected Pruitt’s “consent” defense since the statute expressly says “consent is not a defense.” Finally, the Court held that the fact that Pruitt did not teach at the same school as the students did not entitle her to relief. The Court also rejected an argument that her violation for unlawful distribution of obscene material to a minor didn’t violate her right to Equal Protection to be free from State intervention in a private relationship with a consulting person. The Court ruled against this argument based on the student being a minor (per § 13A-12-200.1) and previous holdings that the State doesn’t violate Equal Protection concerns by prohibiting sexual contact with minors.
 
Towles v. State CR-15-0699
Towles was convicted of capital murder pursuant to §13A-5-40(a)(15) for killing his girlfriend’s son by hitting him on the buttocks with a piece of lumber. This appealed stemmed from a re-trial after the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed his capital murder conviction and death sentence years back. In the interim, Towles’ girlfriend pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. The girlfriend didn’t testify at trial. Towles’ defense was that she caused the death and then blackmailed him to help her cover up the child’s death. However, the State impeached Towles by discussing how she had pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. REVERSED The Court concluded that the introduction of the girlfriend’s conviction into evidence was improper evidence of Towles’ guilt. The Court also concluded that the trial court’s instruction that “knowledge of the probability of death or great bodily harm is sufficient to constitute murder” impermissibly lessened the State’s burden and undermined the defense’s argument that the killing was, at most, unintentional. Mr. Towles will now go back for his third trial.

 

Betton v. State CR-15-1501
Betton was a juvenile capital defendant seeking re-sentencing under Miller v. Alabama. Here, the circuit court re-sentenced him to LWOP without considering the factors the Alabama Supreme Court announced in Ex parte Henderson. REMANDED The Court held that remand was necessary for the circuit court to enter specific findings under Ex parte Henderson.
 
Battles v. State CR-17-0044
In a prosecution for unlawful possession of a pistol by a forbidden person pursuant to § 13A-11-72(a), Battles waived counsel and represented himself at trial. However, throughout, Battles complained that he didn’t understand the charges against him and complained that he didn’t have the resources necessary to defend his case. REVERSED The Court concluded that while Battles knowingly waived his right to represent himself at trial, the circuit court failed to the factors a court must discuss with a defendant pursuant to Fitzpatrick v. Wainwright, 800 F. 2d 1057 (11th Cir. 1986) and Tomlin v. State, 601 So. 2d 124 (Ala. 1991). Additionally, the court failed to tell Battles he could withdraw the waiver at any time.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

gadsden alabama alfonso morris SCOTUS, identity theft sentencing law and policy blog summaries state of arizona midazolam hall v florida drug possession, fake kidnapping, armed robbery attempted murder asia mcclain moving violations OJ Simpson baldwin county alabama fort payne alabama Dylann Roof limestone county alabama homicide rate drug smuggling albertville alabama huntsville alabama law enforcement agency montgomery alabama Etowah County Alabama, US Supreme Court Update illegal gun carry legende v state state of alabama debtor prison street racing clarence thomas domestic violence springville alabama marion county Tommy Arthur adger alabama forced isolation implied consent eighth amendment, texas hoax destructive devices hurst mandamus constitutional law, eleventh circuit ruling unlawful manufacturing shooting warrantless blood draws second amendment bailey v us peyton pruitt parole capital murder theft warrior alabama capital punishment aziz sayyed keith v state murder shooting death Mike Hubbard ring v arizona 2016 election, scotus mcwilliams v dunn social media theft of property abduction homicide Marengo County Alabama heflin alabama tuscaloosa alabama Tracie Todd christmas shooting Donald Trump, concealed carry terell corey mcmullin bomb threat New York Times birchfield v north dakota battles v state prostitution sting sarah koenig church robberies operation bullseye jerry bohannon beylund v north dakota Samuel Alito lauderdale county alabama robberies oneonta alabama brookside alabama abandonment judicial override mount olive alabama morris alabama madison alabama Stephen Breyer fraud Rule 32 rainbow city alabama decatur alabama shelby county drug trafficking, criminal justice trussville alabama south carolina brian fredick lucas death penalty ex parte briseno stanley brent chapman Kay Ivey minor offenses mike gilotti West Alabama kimberly alabama Justice Sotomayor Benn v State russell calhoun mobile alabama pruitt v state drug busts Xavier Beasley huntsville alabama alabama criminal law roundup criminal mischief dothan alabama lethal injection Adamsville alabama Easter drug seizure eric sterling executions Walker County Alabama alabama blountsville alabama Alabaster alabama towles v state mountain brook alabama fraudulent checks blount county alabama Sardis Alabama Alonzo Ephraim stoves v state adnan syed, department of justice, dekalb county alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church benjamin todd acton apprendi v new jersey betton v state hurst v florida Eutaw Alabama anniston alabama, pelham alabama habeas corpus relief campbell v state baltimore city circuit court Ingmire v State edwards v arizona Woods v State foley alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing § 13A-3-23 pell city alabama LWOP brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix strickland v washington kenneth eugene billups sixth amendment sheffield v state William Pryor florence alabama steve avery public assistance fraud talladega superspeedway mccalla alabama domestic abuse heritage christian university OJ Simpson Made in America Jefferson County Alabama brady v maryland constitutional violations Wesley Adam Whitworth Hillary Clinton, boaz alabama netflix Joshua Reese smith v state Shonda Walker, john earle redfearn IV v state fairfield alabama, felony assaults pinson alabama birmingham alabama levins v state Malone v State economic growth debit card skimming scams death penalty, greene county alabama court of criminal appeals drug activity gun rights cullman alabama Neil Gorsuch sexual assault bernard v north dakota burglary utah v strieff the mannequin challenge Glaze v State aiding and abetting Pleasant Grove Alabama negligent homicide npr calhoun county alabama road rage cherokee county alabama st clair county alabama tarrant alabama hanceville alabama self defense lethal injection drugs underage drinking embezzlement fultondale alabama drug crimes arson ake v oklahoma narcotics investigation Lucky D Arcade crime of passion utah supreme court hoover alabama bessemer alabama operation crackdown breaking and entering abuse capital offenses making a murderer 28 U.S.C. § 2254 car accident department of justice court of criminal appeal releases moore v texas shoplifting christian guitierez Gardendale Alabama serial editorial Fentanyl home repair fraud banville v state Kareem Dacar Gaymon CCA update gun control fourth amendment Guy Terrell Junior criminal justice reform, maryland court of special appeals eugene lee jones v state court systems, kidnapping lamar county nicholas hawkins Thomas Hardiman assault ferguson missouri mulga alabama morgan county alabama animal cruelty nathan woods illegal gambling avondale alabama alabama supreme court endangerment of a child dora alabama brendan dassey

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.