CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeals Decisions - April 2018

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, April 27, 2018

 Pruitt v. State 16-0956

 

 

Pruitt pleaded guilty to two counts of committing a sex act with a student, violations of § 13A-6-81, and two counts of distributing obscene material to a minor, violations of § 13A-12-200.5. These offenses involved 3 students Pruitt formerly taught. Pruitt was a teacher in the Blount County School system. She taught at the Locust Fork High School during the 2012-13 and 2013-14 school years. She taught the three students during this time. Beginning in the 2014-15 school year, Pruitt was transferred to Appalachian High School. During October 2014, she sent Student #1 nude Snapchat pictures, had deviate sexual intercourse with Student #2, and had sexual intercourse with Student #3. For all intents and purposes, the acts were consensual. These facts were stipulated by both sides. Prior to pleading guilty, Pruitt, relying on Lawrence v. Texas, argued that the statutes and charges were unconstitutional as applied to her. AFFIRMED The Court of Criminal Appeals rejected the Lawrence-based argument on the grounds that Lawrence explicitly held that the decision didn’t apply to conduct involving minors. Further, the Court concluded that the State has a legitimate state interest in “prohibiting intimate contact between a teacher and a student.” The Court likewise rejected Pruitt’s “consent” defense since the statute expressly says “consent is not a defense.” Finally, the Court held that the fact that Pruitt did not teach at the same school as the students did not entitle her to relief. The Court also rejected an argument that her violation for unlawful distribution of obscene material to a minor didn’t violate her right to Equal Protection to be free from State intervention in a private relationship with a consulting person. The Court ruled against this argument based on the student being a minor (per § 13A-12-200.1) and previous holdings that the State doesn’t violate Equal Protection concerns by prohibiting sexual contact with minors.
 
Towles v. State CR-15-0699
Towles was convicted of capital murder pursuant to §13A-5-40(a)(15) for killing his girlfriend’s son by hitting him on the buttocks with a piece of lumber. This appealed stemmed from a re-trial after the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed his capital murder conviction and death sentence years back. In the interim, Towles’ girlfriend pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. The girlfriend didn’t testify at trial. Towles’ defense was that she caused the death and then blackmailed him to help her cover up the child’s death. However, the State impeached Towles by discussing how she had pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. REVERSED The Court concluded that the introduction of the girlfriend’s conviction into evidence was improper evidence of Towles’ guilt. The Court also concluded that the trial court’s instruction that “knowledge of the probability of death or great bodily harm is sufficient to constitute murder” impermissibly lessened the State’s burden and undermined the defense’s argument that the killing was, at most, unintentional. Mr. Towles will now go back for his third trial.

 

Betton v. State CR-15-1501
Betton was a juvenile capital defendant seeking re-sentencing under Miller v. Alabama. Here, the circuit court re-sentenced him to LWOP without considering the factors the Alabama Supreme Court announced in Ex parte Henderson. REMANDED The Court held that remand was necessary for the circuit court to enter specific findings under Ex parte Henderson.
 
Battles v. State CR-17-0044
In a prosecution for unlawful possession of a pistol by a forbidden person pursuant to § 13A-11-72(a), Battles waived counsel and represented himself at trial. However, throughout, Battles complained that he didn’t understand the charges against him and complained that he didn’t have the resources necessary to defend his case. REVERSED The Court concluded that while Battles knowingly waived his right to represent himself at trial, the circuit court failed to the factors a court must discuss with a defendant pursuant to Fitzpatrick v. Wainwright, 800 F. 2d 1057 (11th Cir. 1986) and Tomlin v. State, 601 So. 2d 124 (Ala. 1991). Additionally, the court failed to tell Battles he could withdraw the waiver at any time.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

alabama supreme court tuscaloosa alabama Lucky D Arcade jerry bohannon betton v state brendan dassey apprendi v new jersey adnan syed, drug possession, albertville alabama fort payne alabama unlawful manufacturing criminal justice reform, Etowah County Alabama, npr theft stoves v state Kay Ivey avondale alabama south carolina hall v florida kidnapping Tracie Todd tarrant alabama endangerment of a child battles v state clarence thomas parole court systems, street racing sheffield v state ex parte briseno criminal justice gadsden alabama state of arizona fraudulent checks homicide capital murder asia mcclain capital punishment mulga alabama talladega superspeedway prostitution sting drug smuggling drug busts hanceville alabama burglary brady v maryland Joshua Reese drug trafficking, court of criminal appeals aziz sayyed OJ Simpson Made in America Alabaster alabama abandonment brookside alabama sixth amendment narcotics investigation mcwilliams v dunn crime of passion homicide rate illegal gambling pruitt v state kimberly alabama fultondale alabama editorial Rule 32 rainbow city alabama dothan alabama Jefferson County Alabama OJ Simpson executions robberies alfonso morris Adamsville alabama birchfield v north dakota bernard v north dakota pelham alabama forced isolation Sardis Alabama lauderdale county alabama christian guitierez montgomery alabama texas legende v state Gardendale Alabama negligent homicide mount olive alabama pinson alabama murder the mannequin challenge ring v arizona SCOTUS, adger alabama greene county alabama identity theft anniston alabama, lethal injection banville v state abduction death penalty cullman alabama William Pryor campbell v state morgan county alabama bessemer alabama heritage christian university Guy Terrell Junior utah supreme court making a murderer judicial override Pleasant Grove Alabama hurst mandamus capital offenses aiding and abetting Dylann Roof serial brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix shelby county fake kidnapping, peyton pruitt christmas shooting domestic abuse debtor prison Eutaw Alabama steve avery boaz alabama warrior alabama court of criminal appeal releases Woods v State limestone county alabama social media operation crackdown West Alabama mountain brook alabama Justice Sotomayor foley alabama underage drinking trussville alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing utah v strieff shoplifting marion county assault edwards v arizona implied consent operation bullseye US Supreme Court Update mobile alabama public assistance fraud attempted murder levins v state Shonda Walker, mccalla alabama Fentanyl Tommy Arthur Wesley Adam Whitworth New York Times russell calhoun eugene lee jones v state state of alabama alabama warrantless blood draws gun rights drug crimes Mike Hubbard fraud department of justice, fourth amendment constitutional law, baltimore city circuit court gun control mike gilotti Hillary Clinton, ake v oklahoma heflin alabama Easter 28 U.S.C. § 2254 huntsville nathan woods eighth amendment, decatur alabama second amendment moore v texas bomb threat fairfield alabama, Benn v State hurst v florida sentencing law and policy blog summaries Glaze v State midazolam florence alabama madison alabama towles v state Donald Trump, Xavier Beasley theft of property Alonzo Ephraim lethal injection drugs home repair fraud sarah koenig keith v state shooting smith v state ferguson missouri bailey v us baldwin county alabama beylund v north dakota oneonta alabama dora alabama criminal mischief alabama criminal law roundup concealed carry constitutional violations § 13A-3-23 huntsville alabama car accident shooting death blountsville alabama road rage department of justice Neil Gorsuch moving violations church robberies embezzlement netflix st clair county alabama springville alabama stanley brent chapman Stephen Breyer drug seizure LWOP minor offenses nicholas hawkins scotus arson domestic violence self defense habeas corpus relief kenneth eugene billups felony assaults illegal gun carry calhoun county alabama brian fredick lucas benjamin todd acton birmingham alabama Malone v State armed robbery Ingmire v State death penalty, alabama law enforcement agency dekalb county alabama pell city alabama abuse drug activity economic growth Thomas Hardiman strickland v washington breaking and entering 2016 election, eleventh circuit ruling terell corey mcmullin Walker County Alabama cherokee county alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church Samuel Alito john earle redfearn IV v state maryland court of special appeals lamar county blount county alabama hoover alabama Marengo County Alabama debit card skimming scams sexual assault CCA update hoax destructive devices morris alabama eric sterling Kareem Dacar Gaymon animal cruelty

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.