CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeals Decisions - April 2018

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, April 27, 2018

 Pruitt v. State 16-0956

 

 

Pruitt pleaded guilty to two counts of committing a sex act with a student, violations of § 13A-6-81, and two counts of distributing obscene material to a minor, violations of § 13A-12-200.5. These offenses involved 3 students Pruitt formerly taught. Pruitt was a teacher in the Blount County School system. She taught at the Locust Fork High School during the 2012-13 and 2013-14 school years. She taught the three students during this time. Beginning in the 2014-15 school year, Pruitt was transferred to Appalachian High School. During October 2014, she sent Student #1 nude Snapchat pictures, had deviate sexual intercourse with Student #2, and had sexual intercourse with Student #3. For all intents and purposes, the acts were consensual. These facts were stipulated by both sides. Prior to pleading guilty, Pruitt, relying on Lawrence v. Texas, argued that the statutes and charges were unconstitutional as applied to her. AFFIRMED The Court of Criminal Appeals rejected the Lawrence-based argument on the grounds that Lawrence explicitly held that the decision didn’t apply to conduct involving minors. Further, the Court concluded that the State has a legitimate state interest in “prohibiting intimate contact between a teacher and a student.” The Court likewise rejected Pruitt’s “consent” defense since the statute expressly says “consent is not a defense.” Finally, the Court held that the fact that Pruitt did not teach at the same school as the students did not entitle her to relief. The Court also rejected an argument that her violation for unlawful distribution of obscene material to a minor didn’t violate her right to Equal Protection to be free from State intervention in a private relationship with a consulting person. The Court ruled against this argument based on the student being a minor (per § 13A-12-200.1) and previous holdings that the State doesn’t violate Equal Protection concerns by prohibiting sexual contact with minors.
 
Towles v. State CR-15-0699
Towles was convicted of capital murder pursuant to §13A-5-40(a)(15) for killing his girlfriend’s son by hitting him on the buttocks with a piece of lumber. This appealed stemmed from a re-trial after the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed his capital murder conviction and death sentence years back. In the interim, Towles’ girlfriend pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. The girlfriend didn’t testify at trial. Towles’ defense was that she caused the death and then blackmailed him to help her cover up the child’s death. However, the State impeached Towles by discussing how she had pleaded guilty for failing to protect her son from Towles. REVERSED The Court concluded that the introduction of the girlfriend’s conviction into evidence was improper evidence of Towles’ guilt. The Court also concluded that the trial court’s instruction that “knowledge of the probability of death or great bodily harm is sufficient to constitute murder” impermissibly lessened the State’s burden and undermined the defense’s argument that the killing was, at most, unintentional. Mr. Towles will now go back for his third trial.

 

Betton v. State CR-15-1501
Betton was a juvenile capital defendant seeking re-sentencing under Miller v. Alabama. Here, the circuit court re-sentenced him to LWOP without considering the factors the Alabama Supreme Court announced in Ex parte Henderson. REMANDED The Court held that remand was necessary for the circuit court to enter specific findings under Ex parte Henderson.
 
Battles v. State CR-17-0044
In a prosecution for unlawful possession of a pistol by a forbidden person pursuant to § 13A-11-72(a), Battles waived counsel and represented himself at trial. However, throughout, Battles complained that he didn’t understand the charges against him and complained that he didn’t have the resources necessary to defend his case. REVERSED The Court concluded that while Battles knowingly waived his right to represent himself at trial, the circuit court failed to the factors a court must discuss with a defendant pursuant to Fitzpatrick v. Wainwright, 800 F. 2d 1057 (11th Cir. 1986) and Tomlin v. State, 601 So. 2d 124 (Ala. 1991). Additionally, the court failed to tell Battles he could withdraw the waiver at any time.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

Kareem Dacar Gaymon brendan dassey illegal gun carry beylund v north dakota Kay Ivey asia mcclain decatur alabama npr brookside alabama unlawful manufacturing aziz sayyed narcotics investigation fraud tarrant alabama assault drug activity christian guitierez utah supreme court Adamsville alabama Glaze v State betton v state criminal mischief legende v state constitutional law, maryland court of special appeals pelham alabama implied consent arson kenneth eugene billups huntsville second amendment OJ Simpson Made in America nathan woods social media montgomery alabama mount olive alabama Donald Trump, animal cruelty limestone county alabama Ingmire v State eugene lee jones v state blountsville alabama Fentanyl habeas corpus relief dekalb county alabama Benn v State drug crimes gadsden alabama abandonment Thomas Hardiman constitutional violations department of justice, abduction negligent homicide identity theft mountain brook alabama shooting death robberies alabama criminal law roundup smith v state shooting drug trafficking, criminal justice reform, Alabaster alabama brady v maryland south carolina mobile alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing public assistance fraud Dylann Roof moore v texas towles v state West Alabama illegal gambling warrantless blood draws alabama Mike Hubbard theft road rage editorial SCOTUS, Tracie Todd apprendi v new jersey foley alabama terell corey mcmullin springville alabama cherokee county alabama Easter levins v state eighth amendment, christmas shooting US Supreme Court Update bomb threat avondale alabama nicholas hawkins court of criminal appeal releases bessemer alabama street racing birchfield v north dakota dora alabama sarah koenig talladega superspeedway minor offenses domestic violence department of justice campbell v state church robberies anniston alabama, theft of property Samuel Alito endangerment of a child edwards v arizona benjamin todd acton ring v arizona bernard v north dakota executions Joshua Reese sixth amendment crime of passion fourth amendment armed robbery 2016 election, fake kidnapping, concealed carry mcwilliams v dunn madison alabama drug busts Xavier Beasley New York Times hurst mandamus § 13A-3-23 eric sterling operation crackdown fairfield alabama, death penalty stoves v state strickland v washington heflin alabama state of alabama drug seizure homicide drug smuggling ferguson missouri pell city alabama russell calhoun fort payne alabama parole hanceville alabama Etowah County Alabama, Gardendale Alabama mccalla alabama baltimore city circuit court Marengo County Alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix Malone v State adnan syed, banville v state oneonta alabama pinson alabama debtor prison forced isolation homicide rate peyton pruitt making a murderer mike gilotti john earle redfearn IV v state Alonzo Ephraim keith v state eleventh circuit ruling Woods v State hoover alabama Justice Sotomayor sentencing law and policy blog summaries domestic abuse embezzlement gun control jerry bohannon LWOP attempted murder state of arizona lauderdale county alabama dothan alabama gun rights lethal injection drugs adger alabama Hillary Clinton, birmingham alabama moving violations warrior alabama texas Eutaw Alabama hurst v florida st clair county alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 kidnapping judicial override trussville alabama fultondale alabama underage drinking burglary morris alabama bailey v us marion county alabama law enforcement agency baldwin county alabama mulga alabama alabama supreme court Wesley Adam Whitworth capital murder ex parte briseno debit card skimming scams rainbow city alabama clarence thomas Tommy Arthur drug possession, court of criminal appeals scotus shelby county alfonso morris Briarwood Presbyterian Church court systems, Shonda Walker, lamar county operation bullseye cullman alabama brian fredick lucas hoax destructive devices Neil Gorsuch florence alabama morgan county alabama huntsville alabama murder Walker County Alabama death penalty, fraudulent checks kimberly alabama heritage christian university battles v state felony assaults Stephen Breyer Sardis Alabama aiding and abetting capital punishment breaking and entering home repair fraud criminal justice CCA update Jefferson County Alabama car accident Guy Terrell Junior Lucky D Arcade lethal injection Rule 32 utah v strieff abuse stanley brent chapman William Pryor shoplifting Pleasant Grove Alabama sheffield v state capital offenses greene county alabama ake v oklahoma netflix blount county alabama OJ Simpson tuscaloosa alabama hall v florida boaz alabama calhoun county alabama economic growth sexual assault albertville alabama steve avery self defense serial pruitt v state the mannequin challenge midazolam prostitution sting

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.