CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeal Releases from March 17, 2017

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, March 27, 2017

 

Keith v. State (CR-15-1319)

Keith pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and first-degree unlawful possession of marijuana after police found drugs under the front seat of his car during an inventory search. Officers pulled Keith over when they ran his license plate and realized the tag didn’t match his car. When they ran Keith’s ID, they discovered he had outstanding warrants and placed him under arrest. His car was searched as an inventory search and the drugs were found inside. Keith moved to suppress on the grounds that the search was improper warrantless search.

REVERSED. The Court concluded that the State failed to show that inventory search was carried out “according to standard criteria and on the basis of something other than suspicion of criminal activity.” The Court focused on Ex parte Boyd, 542 So. 2d 1276 (Ala. 1989), where the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that an inventory search was not valid because there was no evidence that law enforcement carried out the search pursuant to policy. Here, the Court found the same deficiencies that the Boyd court found: conclusory statements regarding following inventory policy, a lack of an inventory list, no copy of the policy was presented, and no evidence the officer followed that policy. Judge Joiner wrote a lengthy dissent.

 

Thoughts: I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Alabama Supreme Court take this issue up and ask for clarification for inventory searches andBoyd’s lasting effect. To me, inventory search precedent focuses on whether officers can show a search really was an administrative search and not a fishing expedition.

 

Sheffield v. State (CR-15-1467)

Sheffield was convicted of murder. He argued that he shot the victim in self-defense or by accident. At trial, the State introduced a recording of a heated phone conversation between the defendant and his wife, which was pretty damning to the defense -- she basically said he murdered the victim and didn’t act in self defense. Sheffield tried to invoke martial privilege to exclude the conversation, but the court allowed its introduction via Rule 804(b)(3) -- statements against interest. The State’s theory was that it was against the spouse’s interest for Sheffield to get convicted of murder.

REVERSED. The Court acknowledged that this was a question of first impression -- whether a declarant’s statements made against her spouse’s penal interest may also be considered against her own pecuniary or proprietary interest. In looking at Oregon case law, the Court concluded that the test as to whether a statement fits within the purview of Rule 804(b)(3) comes down to two central questions: (1) Was the declarant’s primary motive in making the statement to hurt or help her own interest; and (2) Was the risk to the declarant-spouse so great that the statements are inherently reliable? Here, the Court concluded the statements were not against Sheffield’s spouse’s interest (she wanted to divorce him), so they should not have been admitted under Rule 804(b)(3). Moreover, the Court concluded that this error wasn’t harmless given slight evidence presented surrounding the fatal moments.

 

Smith v. State (CR13-0055)

Smith was convicted of two counts of capital murder for a brutal kidnapping-murder/robbery-murder he carried out. At sentencing, the victim’s mother and sister testified that they believed the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for Smith. Smith argued on appeal that this testimony was improper.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED. The Court concluded the victim’s family’s recommendations were improper victim impact statements regarding recommended sentences under Booth v. Maryland. The Court found these statements to be plain error and vacated the death sentence.

Thoughts: I’m not going to be surprised if this gets reversed by the AL SC saying that this error didn’t rise to the level of plain error. I could see the AL SC using Judge Windom’s dissent as a blue print for re-imposing Smith’s death sentence.

 

Legendre v. State (CR-16-0008)

Legendre was on probation and his PO filed a delinquency report alleging that he failed to report, left the state without permission, didn’t pay supervision fees, failed to pay court-ordered moneys, failed to report to CRO and failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse program. At the hearing, the PO testified to trying to contact Legendre and how Legendre had missed meetings with her. In revoking, the court concluded that Legendre’s failure to report rose to the level of “absconding,” which allowed the court to fully revoke his probation. Legendre appealed claiming that he had not absconded.

AFFIRMED. The Court concluded that between his failure to report and his failure to communicate with the PO once she had contacted, the State presented sufficient evidence to prove that Legendre absconded and could be fully revoke.

 

Banville v. State (CR-15-1384)

The preclusive bar of Rule 32.2(d) does not bar a second Rule 32 petition if the first Rule 32 petition was based only upon Rule 32.1(f) -- a request to file an out-of-time appeal.

 

Campbell v. State (CR-15-1187)

Stoves v. State (CR-14-1687)

Both of these cases involved a reversal of one conviction on Double Jeopardy grounds (i.e., duplicate offenses), but an affirming of the remaining counts. Both are fact-intensive and not particularly noteworthy.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

ake v oklahoma mobile alabama beylund v north dakota street racing car accident pelham alabama talladega superspeedway minor offenses Alonzo Ephraim illegal gambling death penalty church robberies abuse 28 U.S.C. § 2254 lethal injection drugs cherokee county alabama state of arizona hoover alabama lethal injection foley alabama steve avery strickland v washington baldwin county alabama pruitt v state court of criminal appeal releases Briarwood Presbyterian Church sarah koenig bailey v us brookside alabama the mannequin challenge attempted murder alabama law enforcement agency rainbow city alabama drug activity OJ Simpson Jefferson County Alabama SCOTUS, eric sterling albertville alabama fraudulent checks cullman alabama nicholas hawkins constitutional law, homicide maryland court of special appeals CCA update breaking and entering benjamin todd acton trussville alabama bomb threat § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing negligent homicide towles v state ex parte briseno shooting Joshua Reese court systems, south carolina Lucky D Arcade eugene lee jones v state jerry bohannon birchfield v north dakota campbell v state alabama supreme court death penalty, limestone county alabama stoves v state Shonda Walker, asia mcclain LWOP Etowah County Alabama, gun rights edwards v arizona crime of passion boaz alabama Eutaw Alabama identity theft hanceville alabama operation bullseye scotus editorial embezzlement decatur alabama clarence thomas constitutional violations operation crackdown shelby county road rage dekalb county alabama montgomery alabama shoplifting unlawful manufacturing Marengo County Alabama drug smuggling burglary legende v state netflix felony assaults endangerment of a child brady v maryland ferguson missouri sentencing law and policy blog summaries Hillary Clinton, sixth amendment Kareem Dacar Gaymon Ingmire v State kenneth eugene billups abandonment gun control eleventh circuit ruling department of justice apprendi v new jersey assault Thomas Hardiman midazolam Neil Gorsuch Kay Ivey Woods v State madison alabama greene county alabama New York Times hurst mandamus sexual assault Justice Sotomayor betton v state mike gilotti public assistance fraud utah supreme court terell corey mcmullin aiding and abetting shooting death criminal mischief heritage christian university US Supreme Court Update homicide rate christian guitierez home repair fraud aziz sayyed warrantless blood draws drug crimes Glaze v State sheffield v state forced isolation drug seizure capital offenses bernard v north dakota baltimore city circuit court habeas corpus relief Guy Terrell Junior West Alabama peyton pruitt Walker County Alabama tarrant alabama morgan county alabama drug trafficking, nathan woods capital punishment levins v state kimberly alabama Samuel Alito heflin alabama prostitution sting pell city alabama second amendment gadsden alabama murder social media serial dothan alabama birmingham alabama § 13A-3-23 hurst v florida florence alabama huntsville marion county mount olive alabama capital murder drug possession, fraud Stephen Breyer fort payne alabama economic growth mcwilliams v dunn mccalla alabama oneonta alabama brian fredick lucas Malone v State armed robbery theft warrior alabama implied consent blountsville alabama john earle redfearn IV v state self defense executions battles v state npr domestic violence hall v florida theft of property moving violations fairfield alabama, Sardis Alabama court of criminal appeals Donald Trump, smith v state Benn v State springville alabama texas Xavier Beasley alfonso morris pinson alabama animal cruelty huntsville alabama mountain brook alabama state of alabama Alabaster alabama avondale alabama debit card skimming scams tuscaloosa alabama banville v state Tracie Todd ring v arizona Tommy Arthur blount county alabama utah v strieff keith v state drug busts narcotics investigation fake kidnapping, William Pryor department of justice, Adamsville alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama fultondale alabama abduction mulga alabama hoax destructive devices Fentanyl adger alabama judicial override lauderdale county alabama bessemer alabama Easter criminal justice reform, alabama criminal law roundup morris alabama stanley brent chapman parole Mike Hubbard moore v texas 2016 election, christmas shooting alabama concealed carry Dylann Roof russell calhoun dora alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix adnan syed, anniston alabama, debtor prison Gardendale Alabama fourth amendment OJ Simpson Made in America st clair county alabama arson domestic abuse robberies brendan dassey Wesley Adam Whitworth illegal gun carry lamar county kidnapping underage drinking Rule 32 calhoun county alabama making a murderer eighth amendment, criminal justice

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.