CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeal Releases from March 17, 2017

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, March 27, 2017

 

Keith v. State (CR-15-1319)

Keith pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and first-degree unlawful possession of marijuana after police found drugs under the front seat of his car during an inventory search. Officers pulled Keith over when they ran his license plate and realized the tag didn’t match his car. When they ran Keith’s ID, they discovered he had outstanding warrants and placed him under arrest. His car was searched as an inventory search and the drugs were found inside. Keith moved to suppress on the grounds that the search was improper warrantless search.

REVERSED. The Court concluded that the State failed to show that inventory search was carried out “according to standard criteria and on the basis of something other than suspicion of criminal activity.” The Court focused on Ex parte Boyd, 542 So. 2d 1276 (Ala. 1989), where the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that an inventory search was not valid because there was no evidence that law enforcement carried out the search pursuant to policy. Here, the Court found the same deficiencies that the Boyd court found: conclusory statements regarding following inventory policy, a lack of an inventory list, no copy of the policy was presented, and no evidence the officer followed that policy. Judge Joiner wrote a lengthy dissent.

 

Thoughts: I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Alabama Supreme Court take this issue up and ask for clarification for inventory searches andBoyd’s lasting effect. To me, inventory search precedent focuses on whether officers can show a search really was an administrative search and not a fishing expedition.

 

Sheffield v. State (CR-15-1467)

Sheffield was convicted of murder. He argued that he shot the victim in self-defense or by accident. At trial, the State introduced a recording of a heated phone conversation between the defendant and his wife, which was pretty damning to the defense -- she basically said he murdered the victim and didn’t act in self defense. Sheffield tried to invoke martial privilege to exclude the conversation, but the court allowed its introduction via Rule 804(b)(3) -- statements against interest. The State’s theory was that it was against the spouse’s interest for Sheffield to get convicted of murder.

REVERSED. The Court acknowledged that this was a question of first impression -- whether a declarant’s statements made against her spouse’s penal interest may also be considered against her own pecuniary or proprietary interest. In looking at Oregon case law, the Court concluded that the test as to whether a statement fits within the purview of Rule 804(b)(3) comes down to two central questions: (1) Was the declarant’s primary motive in making the statement to hurt or help her own interest; and (2) Was the risk to the declarant-spouse so great that the statements are inherently reliable? Here, the Court concluded the statements were not against Sheffield’s spouse’s interest (she wanted to divorce him), so they should not have been admitted under Rule 804(b)(3). Moreover, the Court concluded that this error wasn’t harmless given slight evidence presented surrounding the fatal moments.

 

Smith v. State (CR13-0055)

Smith was convicted of two counts of capital murder for a brutal kidnapping-murder/robbery-murder he carried out. At sentencing, the victim’s mother and sister testified that they believed the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for Smith. Smith argued on appeal that this testimony was improper.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED. The Court concluded the victim’s family’s recommendations were improper victim impact statements regarding recommended sentences under Booth v. Maryland. The Court found these statements to be plain error and vacated the death sentence.

Thoughts: I’m not going to be surprised if this gets reversed by the AL SC saying that this error didn’t rise to the level of plain error. I could see the AL SC using Judge Windom’s dissent as a blue print for re-imposing Smith’s death sentence.

 

Legendre v. State (CR-16-0008)

Legendre was on probation and his PO filed a delinquency report alleging that he failed to report, left the state without permission, didn’t pay supervision fees, failed to pay court-ordered moneys, failed to report to CRO and failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse program. At the hearing, the PO testified to trying to contact Legendre and how Legendre had missed meetings with her. In revoking, the court concluded that Legendre’s failure to report rose to the level of “absconding,” which allowed the court to fully revoke his probation. Legendre appealed claiming that he had not absconded.

AFFIRMED. The Court concluded that between his failure to report and his failure to communicate with the PO once she had contacted, the State presented sufficient evidence to prove that Legendre absconded and could be fully revoke.

 

Banville v. State (CR-15-1384)

The preclusive bar of Rule 32.2(d) does not bar a second Rule 32 petition if the first Rule 32 petition was based only upon Rule 32.1(f) -- a request to file an out-of-time appeal.

 

Campbell v. State (CR-15-1187)

Stoves v. State (CR-14-1687)

Both of these cases involved a reversal of one conviction on Double Jeopardy grounds (i.e., duplicate offenses), but an affirming of the remaining counts. Both are fact-intensive and not particularly noteworthy.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

Donald Trump, mountain brook alabama ex parte briseno alabama midazolam fake kidnapping, birchfield v north dakota William Pryor OJ Simpson street racing fairfield alabama, identity theft lethal injection drugs albertville alabama mccalla alabama texas parole sixth amendment self defense Lucky D Arcade adger alabama bailey v us capital punishment armed robbery mobile alabama rainbow city alabama second amendment Kareem Dacar Gaymon Pleasant Grove Alabama fultondale alabama Jefferson County Alabama oneonta alabama US Supreme Court Update Tracie Todd church robberies department of justice greene county alabama dothan alabama ferguson missouri narcotics investigation strickland v washington baldwin county alabama south carolina eugene lee jones v state kidnapping Sardis Alabama road rage nathan woods executions 28 U.S.C. § 2254 mike gilotti mulga alabama morgan county alabama cherokee county alabama debtor prison Eutaw Alabama alabama supreme court burglary operation crackdown New York Times gun control state of arizona drug trafficking, fraudulent checks Briarwood Presbyterian Church Walker County Alabama car accident montgomery alabama steve avery florence alabama Ingmire v State hanceville alabama shooting death death penalty, apprendi v new jersey Guy Terrell Junior nicholas hawkins pell city alabama attempted murder limestone county alabama CCA update shelby county social media alabama law enforcement agency Etowah County Alabama, calhoun county alabama Hillary Clinton, Kay Ivey constitutional law, crime of passion SCOTUS, Neil Gorsuch serial utah supreme court heflin alabama hurst v florida netflix clarence thomas edwards v arizona eleventh circuit ruling operation bullseye Dylann Roof mcwilliams v dunn court of criminal appeal releases anniston alabama, christian guitierez death penalty ake v oklahoma boaz alabama brady v maryland campbell v state terell corey mcmullin maryland court of special appeals LWOP marion county dekalb county alabama prostitution sting morris alabama eighth amendment, West Alabama christmas shooting theft of property aziz sayyed the mannequin challenge kimberly alabama sarah koenig theft unlawful manufacturing hoax destructive devices pruitt v state Mike Hubbard drug smuggling birmingham alabama towles v state illegal gambling home repair fraud heritage christian university baltimore city circuit court fraud criminal mischief sheffield v state § 13A-3-23 breaking and entering fourth amendment lethal injection hoover alabama drug activity aiding and abetting Benn v State shooting economic growth assault fort payne alabama abandonment hall v florida drug possession, kenneth eugene billups st clair county alabama Shonda Walker, Rule 32 moving violations Wesley Adam Whitworth lamar county tuscaloosa alabama animal cruelty sexual assault abduction ring v arizona sentencing law and policy blog summaries minor offenses habeas corpus relief bernard v north dakota arson endangerment of a child Glaze v State betton v state Thomas Hardiman warrantless blood draws blountsville alabama lauderdale county alabama capital offenses john earle redfearn IV v state drug crimes homicide Gardendale Alabama Easter gun rights § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing cullman alabama adnan syed, Woods v State Malone v State mount olive alabama shoplifting moore v texas underage drinking talladega superspeedway jerry bohannon stanley brent chapman Xavier Beasley Samuel Alito alfonso morris stoves v state state of alabama murder eric sterling Justice Sotomayor Stephen Breyer foley alabama editorial implied consent brookside alabama beylund v north dakota embezzlement alabama criminal law roundup making a murderer drug busts keith v state decatur alabama brendan dassey court of criminal appeals Fentanyl Tommy Arthur judicial override banville v state negligent homicide domestic violence russell calhoun legende v state peyton pruitt robberies tarrant alabama forced isolation illegal gun carry utah v strieff pinson alabama scotus capital murder pelham alabama bessemer alabama trussville alabama levins v state battles v state constitutional violations department of justice, Adamsville alabama warrior alabama huntsville 2016 election, madison alabama Alonzo Ephraim brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix npr concealed carry domestic abuse bomb threat smith v state springville alabama criminal justice reform, Marengo County Alabama benjamin todd acton criminal justice hurst mandamus brian fredick lucas Joshua Reese court systems, abuse drug seizure debit card skimming scams OJ Simpson Made in America public assistance fraud blount county alabama Alabaster alabama avondale alabama asia mcclain homicide rate dora alabama felony assaults gadsden alabama huntsville alabama

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.