CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeal Releases from March 17, 2017

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, March 27, 2017


Keith v. State (CR-15-1319)

Keith pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and first-degree unlawful possession of marijuana after police found drugs under the front seat of his car during an inventory search. Officers pulled Keith over when they ran his license plate and realized the tag didn’t match his car. When they ran Keith’s ID, they discovered he had outstanding warrants and placed him under arrest. His car was searched as an inventory search and the drugs were found inside. Keith moved to suppress on the grounds that the search was improper warrantless search.

REVERSED. The Court concluded that the State failed to show that inventory search was carried out “according to standard criteria and on the basis of something other than suspicion of criminal activity.” The Court focused on Ex parte Boyd, 542 So. 2d 1276 (Ala. 1989), where the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that an inventory search was not valid because there was no evidence that law enforcement carried out the search pursuant to policy. Here, the Court found the same deficiencies that the Boyd court found: conclusory statements regarding following inventory policy, a lack of an inventory list, no copy of the policy was presented, and no evidence the officer followed that policy. Judge Joiner wrote a lengthy dissent.


Thoughts: I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Alabama Supreme Court take this issue up and ask for clarification for inventory searches andBoyd’s lasting effect. To me, inventory search precedent focuses on whether officers can show a search really was an administrative search and not a fishing expedition.


Sheffield v. State (CR-15-1467)

Sheffield was convicted of murder. He argued that he shot the victim in self-defense or by accident. At trial, the State introduced a recording of a heated phone conversation between the defendant and his wife, which was pretty damning to the defense -- she basically said he murdered the victim and didn’t act in self defense. Sheffield tried to invoke martial privilege to exclude the conversation, but the court allowed its introduction via Rule 804(b)(3) -- statements against interest. The State’s theory was that it was against the spouse’s interest for Sheffield to get convicted of murder.

REVERSED. The Court acknowledged that this was a question of first impression -- whether a declarant’s statements made against her spouse’s penal interest may also be considered against her own pecuniary or proprietary interest. In looking at Oregon case law, the Court concluded that the test as to whether a statement fits within the purview of Rule 804(b)(3) comes down to two central questions: (1) Was the declarant’s primary motive in making the statement to hurt or help her own interest; and (2) Was the risk to the declarant-spouse so great that the statements are inherently reliable? Here, the Court concluded the statements were not against Sheffield’s spouse’s interest (she wanted to divorce him), so they should not have been admitted under Rule 804(b)(3). Moreover, the Court concluded that this error wasn’t harmless given slight evidence presented surrounding the fatal moments.


Smith v. State (CR13-0055)

Smith was convicted of two counts of capital murder for a brutal kidnapping-murder/robbery-murder he carried out. At sentencing, the victim’s mother and sister testified that they believed the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for Smith. Smith argued on appeal that this testimony was improper.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED. The Court concluded the victim’s family’s recommendations were improper victim impact statements regarding recommended sentences under Booth v. Maryland. The Court found these statements to be plain error and vacated the death sentence.

Thoughts: I’m not going to be surprised if this gets reversed by the AL SC saying that this error didn’t rise to the level of plain error. I could see the AL SC using Judge Windom’s dissent as a blue print for re-imposing Smith’s death sentence.


Legendre v. State (CR-16-0008)

Legendre was on probation and his PO filed a delinquency report alleging that he failed to report, left the state without permission, didn’t pay supervision fees, failed to pay court-ordered moneys, failed to report to CRO and failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse program. At the hearing, the PO testified to trying to contact Legendre and how Legendre had missed meetings with her. In revoking, the court concluded that Legendre’s failure to report rose to the level of “absconding,” which allowed the court to fully revoke his probation. Legendre appealed claiming that he had not absconded.

AFFIRMED. The Court concluded that between his failure to report and his failure to communicate with the PO once she had contacted, the State presented sufficient evidence to prove that Legendre absconded and could be fully revoke.


Banville v. State (CR-15-1384)

The preclusive bar of Rule 32.2(d) does not bar a second Rule 32 petition if the first Rule 32 petition was based only upon Rule 32.1(f) -- a request to file an out-of-time appeal.


Campbell v. State (CR-15-1187)

Stoves v. State (CR-14-1687)

Both of these cases involved a reversal of one conviction on Double Jeopardy grounds (i.e., duplicate offenses), but an affirming of the remaining counts. Both are fact-intensive and not particularly noteworthy.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


sexual assault operation crackdown felony assaults sentencing law and policy blog summaries tuscaloosa alabama lethal injection drugs Marengo County Alabama cherokee county alabama nicholas hawkins alabama law enforcement agency making a murderer alabama criminal law roundup huntsville alabama asia mcclain apprendi v new jersey death penalty baltimore city circuit court alabama supreme court brady v maryland assault West Alabama dekalb county alabama § 13A-3-23 capital punishment mount olive alabama homicide rate drug crimes mountain brook alabama eric sterling William Pryor moore v texas morgan county alabama edwards v arizona mulga alabama adnan syed, identity theft towles v state Ingmire v State battles v state criminal justice reform, illegal gambling animal cruelty public assistance fraud shoplifting fraud eugene lee jones v state § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing texas OJ Simpson christian guitierez economic growth burglary Jefferson County Alabama eleventh circuit ruling breaking and entering betton v state state of alabama car accident Sardis Alabama foley alabama Samuel Alito drug busts fraudulent checks mobile alabama Eutaw Alabama campbell v state shooting john earle redfearn IV v state jerry bohannon steve avery lauderdale county alabama Guy Terrell Junior gadsden alabama fourth amendment mcwilliams v dunn drug seizure Easter domestic abuse pinson alabama warrior alabama Thomas Hardiman mike gilotti boaz alabama hanceville alabama Benn v State operation bullseye drug trafficking, abandonment second amendment lamar county nathan woods oneonta alabama unlawful manufacturing ex parte briseno birchfield v north dakota theft Xavier Beasley Stephen Breyer rainbow city alabama constitutional law, Wesley Adam Whitworth attempted murder utah v strieff Fentanyl Shonda Walker, capital offenses editorial New York Times executions theft of property beylund v north dakota bailey v us fort payne alabama eighth amendment, st clair county alabama illegal gun carry stoves v state OJ Simpson Made in America Malone v State warrantless blood draws fultondale alabama criminal justice habeas corpus relief benjamin todd acton stanley brent chapman calhoun county alabama hall v florida shooting death talladega superspeedway lethal injection madison alabama domestic violence baldwin county alabama sarah koenig fake kidnapping, heritage christian university drug smuggling minor offenses aiding and abetting social media arson russell calhoun department of justice Neil Gorsuch criminal mischief brookside alabama bessemer alabama clarence thomas debtor prison brian fredick lucas drug possession, kidnapping greene county alabama hurst mandamus Joshua Reese south carolina Tommy Arthur bomb threat US Supreme Court Update underage drinking blountsville alabama homicide endangerment of a child Pleasant Grove Alabama trussville alabama Etowah County Alabama, midazolam implied consent marion county pell city alabama Tracie Todd ferguson missouri Glaze v State cullman alabama florence alabama ake v oklahoma abuse Dylann Roof Adamsville alabama aziz sayyed Walker County Alabama hurst v florida Mike Hubbard ring v arizona death penalty, dora alabama constitutional violations negligent homicide strickland v washington heflin alabama moving violations levins v state springville alabama the mannequin challenge scotus street racing 2016 election, sheffield v state banville v state Kareem Dacar Gaymon state of arizona debit card skimming scams court of criminal appeal releases road rage LWOP robberies serial Woods v State court systems, armed robbery albertville alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix Alonzo Ephraim drug activity peyton pruitt Lucky D Arcade limestone county alabama department of justice, terell corey mcmullin tarrant alabama decatur alabama alfonso morris Donald Trump, pelham alabama Rule 32 hoax destructive devices montgomery alabama Gardendale Alabama adger alabama smith v state hoover alabama pruitt v state kimberly alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 shelby county keith v state sixth amendment blount county alabama Kay Ivey embezzlement gun rights kenneth eugene billups Hillary Clinton, bernard v north dakota anniston alabama, legende v state birmingham alabama prostitution sting murder self defense morris alabama abduction Alabaster alabama npr capital murder judicial override court of criminal appeals alabama concealed carry church robberies huntsville utah supreme court dothan alabama mccalla alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church gun control netflix crime of passion Justice Sotomayor avondale alabama parole brendan dassey home repair fraud forced isolation narcotics investigation fairfield alabama, SCOTUS, maryland court of special appeals christmas shooting CCA update



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.