CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeal Releases from March 17, 2017

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, March 27, 2017

 

Keith v. State (CR-15-1319)

Keith pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and first-degree unlawful possession of marijuana after police found drugs under the front seat of his car during an inventory search. Officers pulled Keith over when they ran his license plate and realized the tag didn’t match his car. When they ran Keith’s ID, they discovered he had outstanding warrants and placed him under arrest. His car was searched as an inventory search and the drugs were found inside. Keith moved to suppress on the grounds that the search was improper warrantless search.

REVERSED. The Court concluded that the State failed to show that inventory search was carried out “according to standard criteria and on the basis of something other than suspicion of criminal activity.” The Court focused on Ex parte Boyd, 542 So. 2d 1276 (Ala. 1989), where the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that an inventory search was not valid because there was no evidence that law enforcement carried out the search pursuant to policy. Here, the Court found the same deficiencies that the Boyd court found: conclusory statements regarding following inventory policy, a lack of an inventory list, no copy of the policy was presented, and no evidence the officer followed that policy. Judge Joiner wrote a lengthy dissent.

 

Thoughts: I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Alabama Supreme Court take this issue up and ask for clarification for inventory searches andBoyd’s lasting effect. To me, inventory search precedent focuses on whether officers can show a search really was an administrative search and not a fishing expedition.

 

Sheffield v. State (CR-15-1467)

Sheffield was convicted of murder. He argued that he shot the victim in self-defense or by accident. At trial, the State introduced a recording of a heated phone conversation between the defendant and his wife, which was pretty damning to the defense -- she basically said he murdered the victim and didn’t act in self defense. Sheffield tried to invoke martial privilege to exclude the conversation, but the court allowed its introduction via Rule 804(b)(3) -- statements against interest. The State’s theory was that it was against the spouse’s interest for Sheffield to get convicted of murder.

REVERSED. The Court acknowledged that this was a question of first impression -- whether a declarant’s statements made against her spouse’s penal interest may also be considered against her own pecuniary or proprietary interest. In looking at Oregon case law, the Court concluded that the test as to whether a statement fits within the purview of Rule 804(b)(3) comes down to two central questions: (1) Was the declarant’s primary motive in making the statement to hurt or help her own interest; and (2) Was the risk to the declarant-spouse so great that the statements are inherently reliable? Here, the Court concluded the statements were not against Sheffield’s spouse’s interest (she wanted to divorce him), so they should not have been admitted under Rule 804(b)(3). Moreover, the Court concluded that this error wasn’t harmless given slight evidence presented surrounding the fatal moments.

 

Smith v. State (CR13-0055)

Smith was convicted of two counts of capital murder for a brutal kidnapping-murder/robbery-murder he carried out. At sentencing, the victim’s mother and sister testified that they believed the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for Smith. Smith argued on appeal that this testimony was improper.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED. The Court concluded the victim’s family’s recommendations were improper victim impact statements regarding recommended sentences under Booth v. Maryland. The Court found these statements to be plain error and vacated the death sentence.

Thoughts: I’m not going to be surprised if this gets reversed by the AL SC saying that this error didn’t rise to the level of plain error. I could see the AL SC using Judge Windom’s dissent as a blue print for re-imposing Smith’s death sentence.

 

Legendre v. State (CR-16-0008)

Legendre was on probation and his PO filed a delinquency report alleging that he failed to report, left the state without permission, didn’t pay supervision fees, failed to pay court-ordered moneys, failed to report to CRO and failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse program. At the hearing, the PO testified to trying to contact Legendre and how Legendre had missed meetings with her. In revoking, the court concluded that Legendre’s failure to report rose to the level of “absconding,” which allowed the court to fully revoke his probation. Legendre appealed claiming that he had not absconded.

AFFIRMED. The Court concluded that between his failure to report and his failure to communicate with the PO once she had contacted, the State presented sufficient evidence to prove that Legendre absconded and could be fully revoke.

 

Banville v. State (CR-15-1384)

The preclusive bar of Rule 32.2(d) does not bar a second Rule 32 petition if the first Rule 32 petition was based only upon Rule 32.1(f) -- a request to file an out-of-time appeal.

 

Campbell v. State (CR-15-1187)

Stoves v. State (CR-14-1687)

Both of these cases involved a reversal of one conviction on Double Jeopardy grounds (i.e., duplicate offenses), but an affirming of the remaining counts. Both are fact-intensive and not particularly noteworthy.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

christian guitierez home repair fraud talladega superspeedway jerry bohannon nicholas hawkins hurst mandamus shoplifting moving violations birmingham alabama alabama law enforcement agency kenneth eugene billups operation bullseye alabama supreme court department of justice negligent homicide abduction boaz alabama heritage christian university arson midazolam mulga alabama lauderdale county alabama burglary homicide rate Stephen Breyer Alabaster alabama sentencing law and policy blog summaries car accident eighth amendment, department of justice, crime of passion criminal justice reform, npr capital punishment capital offenses bomb threat fraud warrantless blood draws smith v state Kareem Dacar Gaymon strickland v washington moore v texas morris alabama New York Times endangerment of a child pinson alabama fraudulent checks 2016 election, morgan county alabama executions theft SCOTUS, social media abuse ferguson missouri kimberly alabama baltimore city circuit court bernard v north dakota habeas corpus relief Walker County Alabama brian fredick lucas shelby county adger alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix pelham alabama Alonzo Ephraim hurst v florida tarrant alabama springville alabama Lucky D Arcade drug busts Glaze v State levins v state Xavier Beasley church robberies assault st clair county alabama pell city alabama avondale alabama embezzlement Tommy Arthur fultondale alabama marion county illegal gun carry Pleasant Grove Alabama huntsville alabama florence alabama Woods v State Malone v State the mannequin challenge constitutional violations montgomery alabama brookside alabama eugene lee jones v state breaking and entering Briarwood Presbyterian Church LWOP drug seizure aiding and abetting nathan woods illegal gambling murder attempted murder Rule 32 sexual assault Joshua Reese Adamsville alabama anniston alabama, debit card skimming scams mcwilliams v dunn scotus steve avery self defense oneonta alabama theft of property US Supreme Court Update banville v state criminal justice minor offenses gun control terell corey mcmullin Benn v State abandonment legende v state road rage blountsville alabama Sardis Alabama alfonso morris greene county alabama keith v state pruitt v state beylund v north dakota Etowah County Alabama, mountain brook alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing cherokee county alabama Samuel Alito concealed carry sarah koenig sixth amendment heflin alabama drug smuggling Gardendale Alabama armed robbery second amendment alabama criminal law roundup drug trafficking, operation crackdown parole Dylann Roof robberies Eutaw Alabama court systems, Fentanyl Donald Trump, hall v florida dora alabama fairfield alabama, Wesley Adam Whitworth hoover alabama Neil Gorsuch state of arizona texas Jefferson County Alabama stanley brent chapman OJ Simpson asia mcclain 28 U.S.C. § 2254 foley alabama Justice Sotomayor William Pryor identity theft drug activity OJ Simpson Made in America public assistance fraud fake kidnapping, Tracie Todd battles v state felony assaults bailey v us ring v arizona warrior alabama blount county alabama decatur alabama mccalla alabama rainbow city alabama lethal injection huntsville calhoun county alabama towles v state mount olive alabama Kay Ivey peyton pruitt clarence thomas Marengo County Alabama serial gadsden alabama brendan dassey West Alabama Thomas Hardiman judicial override state of alabama betton v state editorial limestone county alabama drug crimes apprendi v new jersey unlawful manufacturing john earle redfearn IV v state tuscaloosa alabama prostitution sting debtor prison homicide aziz sayyed Ingmire v State forced isolation dekalb county alabama eleventh circuit ruling bessemer alabama christmas shooting mike gilotti Guy Terrell Junior trussville alabama § 13A-3-23 lethal injection drugs sheffield v state russell calhoun domestic violence CCA update fort payne alabama maryland court of special appeals ex parte briseno birchfield v north dakota fourth amendment utah v strieff death penalty hanceville alabama mobile alabama gun rights animal cruelty netflix hoax destructive devices shooting death Shonda Walker, kidnapping domestic abuse eric sterling implied consent court of criminal appeals street racing adnan syed, economic growth madison alabama edwards v arizona lamar county narcotics investigation capital murder baldwin county alabama criminal mischief benjamin todd acton utah supreme court Mike Hubbard constitutional law, south carolina stoves v state campbell v state death penalty, underage drinking dothan alabama cullman alabama ake v oklahoma albertville alabama making a murderer alabama Easter brady v maryland shooting court of criminal appeal releases drug possession, Hillary Clinton,

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.