CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Court of Criminal Appeal Releases from March 17, 2017

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, March 27, 2017


Keith v. State (CR-15-1319)

Keith pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and first-degree unlawful possession of marijuana after police found drugs under the front seat of his car during an inventory search. Officers pulled Keith over when they ran his license plate and realized the tag didn’t match his car. When they ran Keith’s ID, they discovered he had outstanding warrants and placed him under arrest. His car was searched as an inventory search and the drugs were found inside. Keith moved to suppress on the grounds that the search was improper warrantless search.

REVERSED. The Court concluded that the State failed to show that inventory search was carried out “according to standard criteria and on the basis of something other than suspicion of criminal activity.” The Court focused on Ex parte Boyd, 542 So. 2d 1276 (Ala. 1989), where the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that an inventory search was not valid because there was no evidence that law enforcement carried out the search pursuant to policy. Here, the Court found the same deficiencies that the Boyd court found: conclusory statements regarding following inventory policy, a lack of an inventory list, no copy of the policy was presented, and no evidence the officer followed that policy. Judge Joiner wrote a lengthy dissent.


Thoughts: I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Alabama Supreme Court take this issue up and ask for clarification for inventory searches andBoyd’s lasting effect. To me, inventory search precedent focuses on whether officers can show a search really was an administrative search and not a fishing expedition.


Sheffield v. State (CR-15-1467)

Sheffield was convicted of murder. He argued that he shot the victim in self-defense or by accident. At trial, the State introduced a recording of a heated phone conversation between the defendant and his wife, which was pretty damning to the defense -- she basically said he murdered the victim and didn’t act in self defense. Sheffield tried to invoke martial privilege to exclude the conversation, but the court allowed its introduction via Rule 804(b)(3) -- statements against interest. The State’s theory was that it was against the spouse’s interest for Sheffield to get convicted of murder.

REVERSED. The Court acknowledged that this was a question of first impression -- whether a declarant’s statements made against her spouse’s penal interest may also be considered against her own pecuniary or proprietary interest. In looking at Oregon case law, the Court concluded that the test as to whether a statement fits within the purview of Rule 804(b)(3) comes down to two central questions: (1) Was the declarant’s primary motive in making the statement to hurt or help her own interest; and (2) Was the risk to the declarant-spouse so great that the statements are inherently reliable? Here, the Court concluded the statements were not against Sheffield’s spouse’s interest (she wanted to divorce him), so they should not have been admitted under Rule 804(b)(3). Moreover, the Court concluded that this error wasn’t harmless given slight evidence presented surrounding the fatal moments.


Smith v. State (CR13-0055)

Smith was convicted of two counts of capital murder for a brutal kidnapping-murder/robbery-murder he carried out. At sentencing, the victim’s mother and sister testified that they believed the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for Smith. Smith argued on appeal that this testimony was improper.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED. The Court concluded the victim’s family’s recommendations were improper victim impact statements regarding recommended sentences under Booth v. Maryland. The Court found these statements to be plain error and vacated the death sentence.

Thoughts: I’m not going to be surprised if this gets reversed by the AL SC saying that this error didn’t rise to the level of plain error. I could see the AL SC using Judge Windom’s dissent as a blue print for re-imposing Smith’s death sentence.


Legendre v. State (CR-16-0008)

Legendre was on probation and his PO filed a delinquency report alleging that he failed to report, left the state without permission, didn’t pay supervision fees, failed to pay court-ordered moneys, failed to report to CRO and failed to complete a court-ordered substance abuse program. At the hearing, the PO testified to trying to contact Legendre and how Legendre had missed meetings with her. In revoking, the court concluded that Legendre’s failure to report rose to the level of “absconding,” which allowed the court to fully revoke his probation. Legendre appealed claiming that he had not absconded.

AFFIRMED. The Court concluded that between his failure to report and his failure to communicate with the PO once she had contacted, the State presented sufficient evidence to prove that Legendre absconded and could be fully revoke.


Banville v. State (CR-15-1384)

The preclusive bar of Rule 32.2(d) does not bar a second Rule 32 petition if the first Rule 32 petition was based only upon Rule 32.1(f) -- a request to file an out-of-time appeal.


Campbell v. State (CR-15-1187)

Stoves v. State (CR-14-1687)

Both of these cases involved a reversal of one conviction on Double Jeopardy grounds (i.e., duplicate offenses), but an affirming of the remaining counts. Both are fact-intensive and not particularly noteworthy.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


state of alabama home repair fraud Stephen Breyer florence alabama gadsden alabama dora alabama mount olive alabama Guy Terrell Junior Kay Ivey abandonment midazolam utah supreme court brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix edwards v arizona brady v maryland theft of property Sardis Alabama Hillary Clinton, William Pryor towles v state dothan alabama Benn v State john earle redfearn IV v state ferguson missouri fourth amendment campbell v state domestic abuse capital punishment New York Times birmingham alabama gun rights brendan dassey foley alabama decatur alabama drug trafficking, death penalty moore v texas adger alabama court systems, Justice Sotomayor aiding and abetting adnan syed, beylund v north dakota Joshua Reese Etowah County Alabama, pinson alabama prostitution sting morgan county alabama identity theft hoax destructive devices Walker County Alabama bernard v north dakota terell corey mcmullin st clair county alabama stoves v state fort payne alabama felony assaults south carolina stanley brent chapman Jefferson County Alabama smith v state Eutaw Alabama street racing sexual assault baltimore city circuit court alabama supreme court Lucky D Arcade shooting death mcwilliams v dunn drug smuggling illegal gun carry Mike Hubbard court of criminal appeal releases Pleasant Grove Alabama clarence thomas Rule 32 SCOTUS, Xavier Beasley 28 U.S.C. § 2254 serial betton v state alfonso morris homicide birchfield v north dakota Malone v State eleventh circuit ruling bomb threat scotus underage drinking negligent homicide christmas shooting aziz sayyed mobile alabama abduction fraudulent checks boaz alabama Samuel Alito breaking and entering homicide rate public assistance fraud Tommy Arthur brian fredick lucas springville alabama talladega superspeedway road rage mccalla alabama judicial override the mannequin challenge economic growth drug busts fake kidnapping, bailey v us Wesley Adam Whitworth shoplifting eric sterling abuse Fentanyl lauderdale county alabama sixth amendment embezzlement forced isolation hanceville alabama death penalty, criminal mischief Briarwood Presbyterian Church ex parte briseno texas steve avery blount county alabama CCA update editorial self defense drug seizure shooting shelby county lethal injection drugs lethal injection oneonta alabama npr ring v arizona heritage christian university theft keith v state pruitt v state OJ Simpson Made in America 2016 election, sheffield v state fairfield alabama, utah v strieff criminal justice making a murderer Shonda Walker, hoover alabama mountain brook alabama peyton pruitt court of criminal appeals banville v state Ingmire v State greene county alabama mulga alabama crime of passion operation crackdown avondale alabama armed robbery kidnapping church robberies narcotics investigation nathan woods heflin alabama Thomas Hardiman kimberly alabama second amendment netflix trussville alabama Neil Gorsuch Kareem Dacar Gaymon moving violations warrior alabama eighth amendment, arson alabama criminal law roundup huntsville alabama eugene lee jones v state habeas corpus relief state of arizona levins v state brookside alabama debit card skimming scams pell city alabama baldwin county alabama madison alabama lamar county sarah koenig drug activity constitutional violations assault Marengo County Alabama jerry bohannon sentencing law and policy blog summaries bessemer alabama department of justice, attempted murder concealed carry calhoun county alabama hurst mandamus legende v state Easter dekalb county alabama benjamin todd acton Donald Trump, marion county blountsville alabama christian guitierez car accident minor offenses parole Glaze v State albertville alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing constitutional law, maryland court of special appeals executions US Supreme Court Update apprendi v new jersey gun control limestone county alabama hall v florida cherokee county alabama rainbow city alabama domestic violence Tracie Todd ake v oklahoma robberies debtor prison burglary operation bullseye Woods v State drug crimes unlawful manufacturing LWOP warrantless blood draws pelham alabama Alonzo Ephraim fultondale alabama Gardendale Alabama § 13A-3-23 drug possession, endangerment of a child cullman alabama alabama social media Adamsville alabama Dylann Roof illegal gambling department of justice criminal justice reform, murder fraud animal cruelty anniston alabama, West Alabama nicholas hawkins morris alabama mike gilotti russell calhoun kenneth eugene billups huntsville montgomery alabama OJ Simpson asia mcclain hurst v florida strickland v washington tuscaloosa alabama tarrant alabama battles v state Alabaster alabama alabama law enforcement agency implied consent capital murder capital offenses



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.