CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.


J.D. Lloyd - Friday, May 06, 2016

Eugene Lee Jones v. State (CR-14-1332)


Jones was convicted of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder, stemming from him killing a woman he suspected of setting him up in a robbery. Jones voluntarily talked to investigators on July 29, 2013, in connection to the death, but eventually stopped the questioning when he invoked his right to counsel. Jones was arrested on an outstanding warrant out of Bessemer. Jones was eventually transported back to Lauderdale County on another warrant stemming from a charge unrelated to the homicide. While still in custody, Jones was asked to submit to a polygraph examination. Jones waived his Miranda rights, submitted to the polygraph, and subsequently made another statement in which he admitted that he strangled the victim. Jones moved to suppress this statement under Edwards v. AZ, 451 US 477 (1981) on the grounds that investigators improperly re-initiated contact after he had invoked his right to counsel. The circuit court denied the motion. AFFIRMED. Relying on MD v. Shatzer, 559 US 98 (2010), the CCA affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress on the grounds that “coercive effect” of re-initiation of interrogation wasn’t present in this case like it was in Edwards. Essentially, the Court held that if enough time has passed since the initial invocation of the right to counsel -- more than 14 days -- there is no presumptively problematic re-initiation as there was in Edwards.


Levins v. State (CR-15-0612)


Bell v. State (CR-15-0618)

The appellants in these two cases were two expungement petitioners who were denied relief at the circuit court level and asked the CCA to reverse the denials of their petitions. APPEALS DISMISSED One may only challenge the denial of their expungement petition by petitioning the Alabama Supreme Court for certiorari review of the denial of the petition for expungement.

John Earle Redfearn, IV v. State (CR-14-0500)


This case involved the denial of a motion to suppress drugs evidence recovered from Redfearn’s body. In February 2012, law enforcement obtained a search warrant of Redfearn’s residence based upon 2 controlled buys that occurred at the residence with Redfearn. Law enforcement executed the SW after they observed Redfearn drive away from the house. He was stopped several miles away while the search of the house was going on and taken back to the house by the detaining officers. While executing the warrant, Redfearn’s girlfriend arrived at the house and eventually told the officers that Redfearn keeps drugs on his person. An officer strip-searched Redfearn at the residence and recovered a bottle containing oxycodone pills in his underwear. Redfearn moved to suppress under Bailey v. US, 133 S.Ct. 1031 (2013). AFFIRMED. The CCA explained that while Bailey held that a suspect may be lawfully detained while police are conducting a search warrant only when the person is in the "immediate vicinity" of the place to be searched, Redfearn was properly detained because the police had probable cause to arrest him based upon the controlled buys previously carried out with Redfearn and observed by law enforcement.


Nathaniel Woods (CR-10-0695)

Alfonso Morris (CR-11-1925)

John Russell Calhoun (CR-14-0779)

In these three cases, the CCA affirmed the denial of Rule 32 relief for death-row inmates without holding evidentiary hearings. There’s not much that’s noteworthy in these opinions outside of the observation that the petitions were summarily denied because each petitioner failed to plead sufficient facts that, if proven true, could entitle them to relief. The vast majority of the factual claims in the three petitions were bare-boned factual allegations. In Woods and Morris, petitioners raised claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present certain expert testimony at trial. The CCA affirmed the summary dismissal of these claims because the petitioner failed to identify an expert and what that expert’s testimony would have been at the pleading stage. It bears repeating that if you’re going to raise an IAC claim, in order to be entitled to a hearing, you have to give the circuit court sufficient factual allegations that the court can conclude that your claims could entitle you to relief if proven true. In the context of IAC based on the failure to call certain expert witnesses, you need to make a proffer as to who that expert would have been and what the testimony would have been at the pleading stage.


Brian Fredick Lucas (CR-14-0744)


Lucas was convicted of first-degree attempted sodomy by forcible compulsion and first-degree sexual abuse stemming from an incident in which he allegedly touched his step-daughter on the mouth with his penis while she was sleeping. The CCA reversed his first-degree sodomy conviction on the grounds that the State’s showing did not present evidence of forcible compulsion -- there was no threat by Lucas or evidence that his actions overcame her earnest resistance. The CCA did enter a judgment convicting Lucas of attempted sexual misconduct.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


moore v texas madison alabama the mannequin challenge hurst mandamus Rule 32 dothan alabama domestic abuse underage drinking Alonzo Ephraim birchfield v north dakota aziz sayyed hanceville alabama Jefferson County Alabama fraud Glaze v State capital murder Shonda Walker, midazolam New York Times springville alabama constitutional violations utah supreme court talladega superspeedway church robberies Marengo County Alabama foley alabama homicide rate levins v state banville v state greene county alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix mike gilotti Pleasant Grove Alabama home repair fraud editorial implied consent Stephen Breyer trussville alabama brady v maryland Etowah County Alabama, street racing warrior alabama minor offenses cherokee county alabama blount county alabama pell city alabama huntsville alabama negligent homicide stoves v state hoover alabama Sardis Alabama court of criminal appeals adger alabama sarah koenig keith v state hall v florida criminal justice reform, attempted murder William Pryor anniston alabama, operation bullseye burglary operation crackdown albertville alabama Alabaster alabama CCA update death penalty adnan syed, brian fredick lucas maryland court of special appeals towles v state US Supreme Court Update court of criminal appeal releases Neil Gorsuch alabama criminal law roundup gun rights dekalb county alabama Thomas Hardiman economic growth fairfield alabama, drug activity kimberly alabama eugene lee jones v state cullman alabama shooting death ake v oklahoma breaking and entering murder Eutaw Alabama alabama law enforcement agency marion county nicholas hawkins bomb threat utah v strieff lethal injection drugs drug smuggling heflin alabama tarrant alabama assault OJ Simpson Made in America terell corey mcmullin judicial override embezzlement ex parte briseno abandonment benjamin todd acton dora alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 peyton pruitt sexual assault alfonso morris Gardendale Alabama bailey v us gadsden alabama birmingham alabama st clair county alabama sentencing law and policy blog summaries identity theft lethal injection Samuel Alito Easter shoplifting homicide domestic violence road rage serial constitutional law, texas § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing florence alabama Tommy Arthur state of arizona state of alabama concealed carry mcwilliams v dunn animal cruelty Mike Hubbard jerry bohannon Justice Sotomayor forced isolation mulga alabama prostitution sting drug seizure fort payne alabama pruitt v state armed robbery sixth amendment Adamsville alabama Hillary Clinton, pinson alabama arson department of justice, felony assaults ring v arizona capital offenses SCOTUS, bessemer alabama illegal gambling christian guitierez Benn v State limestone county alabama debit card skimming scams boaz alabama court systems, habeas corpus relief theft of property Tracie Todd baldwin county alabama abduction fourth amendment warrantless blood draws calhoun county alabama shelby county Kay Ivey sheffield v state drug crimes john earle redfearn IV v state netflix debtor prison Donald Trump, Woods v State Xavier Beasley executions blountsville alabama morgan county alabama beylund v north dakota brookside alabama campbell v state Ingmire v State rainbow city alabama public assistance fraud alabama fultondale alabama kenneth eugene billups hurst v florida huntsville mount olive alabama asia mcclain steve avery scotus Joshua Reese Guy Terrell Junior avondale alabama LWOP apprendi v new jersey montgomery alabama russell calhoun south carolina second amendment capital punishment unlawful manufacturing drug trafficking, robberies stanley brent chapman smith v state battles v state baltimore city circuit court kidnapping oneonta alabama Malone v State heritage christian university alabama supreme court illegal gun carry christmas shooting aiding and abetting narcotics investigation strickland v washington lauderdale county alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth eighth amendment, clarence thomas death penalty, Dylann Roof fraudulent checks West Alabama department of justice Briarwood Presbyterian Church making a murderer drug possession, drug busts Fentanyl hoax destructive devices npr criminal justice endangerment of a child criminal mischief ferguson missouri brendan dassey bernard v north dakota car accident Walker County Alabama gun control decatur alabama betton v state OJ Simpson theft abuse Kareem Dacar Gaymon tuscaloosa alabama Lucky D Arcade nathan woods lamar county shooting parole social media self defense crime of passion edwards v arizona eleventh circuit ruling mountain brook alabama mccalla alabama moving violations 2016 election, mobile alabama morris alabama legende v state pelham alabama fake kidnapping, eric sterling § 13A-3-23



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.