CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Adnan Syed of "Serial" Granted New Trial

J.D. Lloyd - Thursday, March 29, 2018


(Image Credit: Getty Images)

 

In the ongoing case of Adnan Syed, made famous by NPR's "Serial" podcast, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals has ruled in Adnan's favor and has ordered that he be granted a new trial. In a long decision, the Court determined that Adnan's trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to investigate Asia McClain, a witness who purportedly could have provided Adnan with a crucial alibi for the window of time he was allegedly killing Hae Min Lee in a Best Buy parking lot.

 

 

The case was on appeal by both Adnan and the State of Maryland. In the Baltimore City Circuit Court, Adnan had been granted a new trial based upon counsel's failure to question the State's cell phone tower data expert about a warning on a fax cover sheet to the data that warned about the data's unreliability. The circuit court had rejected the claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate Asia. Both sides appealed their adverse rulings.

 

And both sides won. The Court of Special Appeals reached the opposite conclusions than that of the Baltimore City Circuit Court. The Court found the circuit court was wrong to grant Adnan relief on the fax cover sheet issue, but was also wrong to deny relief based on counsel's failure to investigate Asia's alibi. The Court explained:
 
McClain’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, would have made it impossible for Syed to have murdered Hae. Trial counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced Syed’s defense, because, but for trial counsel’s failure to investigate, there is a reasonable probability that McClain’s alibi testimony would have raised a reasonable doubt in the mind of at least one juror about Syed’s involvement Hae’s murder, and thus “the result of the proceedings would have been different."

 

When you're complaining that your trial counsel screwed up and denied you your Sixth Amendment right to effective representation, you have to show two things: (1) that some error occurred, and (2) that the error prejudiced you in a way that calls the results of the case into question. You have to show a "reasonable probability" that the results of trial would have been different. You don't have to prove innocence (it helps), but you've got to show more than just "this hurt my case." Here, it's easy to see how a jury could have believed an alibi about Adnan's whereabouts. There was no definitive evidence about where he was -- just circumstantial evidence that was dubious.

 

I don't practice in Maryland and am not well-versed in Maryland appellate procedure, but it looks like the State (or Adnan) might ask a higher court -- the Maryland Court of Appeals -- to review the decision. It doesn't look like either side has a right to appeal to this court and would have to ask for that court to review.

 

Like you, I'm anxiously awaiting a Sarah Koenig update...

 


Recent Posts


Tags

birmingham alabama eric sterling LWOP the mannequin challenge murder shooting death shooting legende v state russell calhoun hanceville alabama alabama supreme court lethal injection theft of property kimberly alabama nathan woods ex parte briseno minor offenses fourth amendment ferguson missouri Tommy Arthur concealed carry making a murderer cherokee county alabama springville alabama Gardendale Alabama drug busts edwards v arizona Easter warrantless blood draws brian fredick lucas lauderdale county alabama eighth amendment, endangerment of a child betton v state Neil Gorsuch mount olive alabama constitutional violations Mike Hubbard court of criminal appeal releases negligent homicide alabama criminal law roundup drug trafficking, executions SCOTUS, brookside alabama debtor prison Thomas Hardiman huntsville alabama heritage christian university prostitution sting Fentanyl baldwin county alabama eleventh circuit ruling state of arizona sheffield v state lamar county Guy Terrell Junior illegal gun carry Shonda Walker, banville v state Lucky D Arcade Adamsville alabama mobile alabama habeas corpus relief William Pryor department of justice asia mcclain shoplifting warrior alabama nicholas hawkins fake kidnapping, Tracie Todd economic growth morris alabama Kay Ivey Hillary Clinton, mccalla alabama hoax destructive devices eugene lee jones v state street racing court systems, beylund v north dakota hoover alabama criminal mischief maryland court of special appeals constitutional law, tarrant alabama OJ Simpson debit card skimming scams homicide terell corey mcmullin christian guitierez narcotics investigation mulga alabama moving violations stoves v state Justice Sotomayor Malone v State benjamin todd acton alfonso morris road rage Samuel Alito Glaze v State arson court of criminal appeals bessemer alabama death penalty, fort payne alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 capital offenses capital murder sexual assault pelham alabama tuscaloosa alabama stanley brent chapman serial Pleasant Grove Alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church criminal justice trussville alabama texas attempted murder § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing Sardis Alabama theft drug possession, underage drinking judicial override animal cruelty forced isolation operation crackdown hurst v florida Rule 32 boaz alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon brady v maryland home repair fraud battles v state adger alabama Eutaw Alabama fairfield alabama, kenneth eugene billups levins v state illegal gambling capital punishment self defense sixth amendment montgomery alabama Woods v State drug activity bernard v north dakota steve avery Wesley Adam Whitworth second amendment hall v florida CCA update Stephen Breyer rainbow city alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix mike gilotti clarence thomas kidnapping bailey v us shelby county south carolina West Alabama moore v texas avondale alabama campbell v state marion county greene county alabama abandonment strickland v washington unlawful manufacturing Jefferson County Alabama abduction morgan county alabama jerry bohannon alabama dora alabama breaking and entering john earle redfearn IV v state armed robbery church robberies midazolam fraud blountsville alabama death penalty drug seizure OJ Simpson Made in America Xavier Beasley apprendi v new jersey blount county alabama st clair county alabama operation bullseye ake v oklahoma 2016 election, domestic abuse assault Marengo County Alabama mountain brook alabama drug crimes embezzlement decatur alabama Alonzo Ephraim brendan dassey fraudulent checks § 13A-3-23 anniston alabama, public assistance fraud domestic violence florence alabama utah supreme court albertville alabama US Supreme Court Update Dylann Roof madison alabama abuse lethal injection drugs parole Walker County Alabama Joshua Reese editorial social media pinson alabama pruitt v state foley alabama sentencing law and policy blog summaries gun rights department of justice, criminal justice reform, Benn v State dothan alabama Ingmire v State hurst mandamus talladega superspeedway adnan syed, oneonta alabama limestone county alabama drug smuggling Alabaster alabama homicide rate pell city alabama crime of passion keith v state felony assaults robberies identity theft gadsden alabama aiding and abetting christmas shooting ring v arizona huntsville cullman alabama scotus New York Times utah v strieff calhoun county alabama car accident smith v state dekalb county alabama Etowah County Alabama, alabama law enforcement agency gun control implied consent baltimore city circuit court towles v state netflix mcwilliams v dunn Donald Trump, heflin alabama burglary sarah koenig peyton pruitt bomb threat npr fultondale alabama aziz sayyed state of alabama birchfield v north dakota

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.