CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

Adnan Syed of "Serial" Granted New Trial

J.D. Lloyd - Thursday, March 29, 2018


(Image Credit: Getty Images)

 

In the ongoing case of Adnan Syed, made famous by NPR's "Serial" podcast, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals has ruled in Adnan's favor and has ordered that he be granted a new trial. In a long decision, the Court determined that Adnan's trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to investigate Asia McClain, a witness who purportedly could have provided Adnan with a crucial alibi for the window of time he was allegedly killing Hae Min Lee in a Best Buy parking lot.

 

 

The case was on appeal by both Adnan and the State of Maryland. In the Baltimore City Circuit Court, Adnan had been granted a new trial based upon counsel's failure to question the State's cell phone tower data expert about a warning on a fax cover sheet to the data that warned about the data's unreliability. The circuit court had rejected the claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate Asia. Both sides appealed their adverse rulings.

 

And both sides won. The Court of Special Appeals reached the opposite conclusions than that of the Baltimore City Circuit Court. The Court found the circuit court was wrong to grant Adnan relief on the fax cover sheet issue, but was also wrong to deny relief based on counsel's failure to investigate Asia's alibi. The Court explained:
 
McClain’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, would have made it impossible for Syed to have murdered Hae. Trial counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced Syed’s defense, because, but for trial counsel’s failure to investigate, there is a reasonable probability that McClain’s alibi testimony would have raised a reasonable doubt in the mind of at least one juror about Syed’s involvement Hae’s murder, and thus “the result of the proceedings would have been different."

 

When you're complaining that your trial counsel screwed up and denied you your Sixth Amendment right to effective representation, you have to show two things: (1) that some error occurred, and (2) that the error prejudiced you in a way that calls the results of the case into question. You have to show a "reasonable probability" that the results of trial would have been different. You don't have to prove innocence (it helps), but you've got to show more than just "this hurt my case." Here, it's easy to see how a jury could have believed an alibi about Adnan's whereabouts. There was no definitive evidence about where he was -- just circumstantial evidence that was dubious.

 

I don't practice in Maryland and am not well-versed in Maryland appellate procedure, but it looks like the State (or Adnan) might ask a higher court -- the Maryland Court of Appeals -- to review the decision. It doesn't look like either side has a right to appeal to this court and would have to ask for that court to review.

 

Like you, I'm anxiously awaiting a Sarah Koenig update...

 


Recent Posts


Tags

making a murderer pell city alabama hoax destructive devices operation crackdown eric sterling cherokee county alabama crime of passion hanceville alabama Alabaster alabama court systems, dothan alabama Dylann Roof economic growth decatur alabama christian guitierez npr debtor prison mulga alabama public assistance fraud kidnapping alabama smith v state benjamin todd acton sentencing law and policy blog summaries prostitution sting state of arizona alabama supreme court criminal justice reform, foley alabama criminal justice birchfield v north dakota SCOTUS, Ingmire v State Thomas Hardiman capital punishment lauderdale county alabama New York Times constitutional law, embezzlement home repair fraud narcotics investigation gadsden alabama implied consent capital offenses scotus department of justice jerry bohannon Kay Ivey underage drinking brendan dassey florence alabama Benn v State levins v state warrior alabama avondale alabama burglary blountsville alabama drug busts breaking and entering Briarwood Presbyterian Church homicide rate alabama criminal law roundup domestic violence drug possession, CCA update Eutaw Alabama fairfield alabama, Mike Hubbard habeas corpus relief limestone county alabama ferguson missouri Tracie Todd shoplifting christmas shooting morris alabama Easter social media st clair county alabama Joshua Reese death penalty, Malone v State alabama law enforcement agency peyton pruitt kimberly alabama blount county alabama theft concealed carry sixth amendment ake v oklahoma shooting dekalb county alabama sexual assault ring v arizona arson nicholas hawkins church robberies towles v state texas eighth amendment, banville v state rainbow city alabama Neil Gorsuch sarah koenig anniston alabama, keith v state OJ Simpson Made in America capital murder operation bullseye Alonzo Ephraim animal cruelty fake kidnapping, gun control Kareem Dacar Gaymon albertville alabama baldwin county alabama § 13A-3-23 fourth amendment adger alabama baltimore city circuit court felony assaults moore v texas gun rights stanley brent chapman lethal injection drugs pelham alabama aiding and abetting murder hurst v florida 2016 election, maryland court of special appeals terell corey mcmullin Woods v State asia mcclain court of criminal appeals minor offenses morgan county alabama Sardis Alabama LWOP armed robbery warrantless blood draws strickland v washington Tommy Arthur lethal injection drug crimes nathan woods abuse alfonso morris mike gilotti Walker County Alabama drug trafficking, apprendi v new jersey huntsville alabama Etowah County Alabama, assault tarrant alabama calhoun county alabama attempted murder editorial montgomery alabama lamar county brian fredick lucas ex parte briseno eugene lee jones v state § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing south carolina hall v florida car accident abduction Pleasant Grove Alabama john earle redfearn IV v state fraud clarence thomas self defense negligent homicide betton v state midazolam pinson alabama Xavier Beasley Justice Sotomayor pruitt v state marion county Marengo County Alabama huntsville heflin alabama oneonta alabama illegal gambling debit card skimming scams mobile alabama battles v state Guy Terrell Junior brady v maryland bomb threat Wesley Adam Whitworth forced isolation utah supreme court West Alabama abandonment fultondale alabama drug activity edwards v arizona mount olive alabama unlawful manufacturing theft of property russell calhoun executions robberies boaz alabama state of alabama court of criminal appeal releases stoves v state road rage department of justice, death penalty hoover alabama utah v strieff domestic abuse drug smuggling birmingham alabama William Pryor Fentanyl eleventh circuit ruling drug seizure second amendment serial identity theft beylund v north dakota tuscaloosa alabama netflix Samuel Alito Rule 32 the mannequin challenge springville alabama trussville alabama madison alabama heritage christian university moving violations shelby county kenneth eugene billups endangerment of a child Stephen Breyer Hillary Clinton, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Glaze v State talladega superspeedway fraudulent checks aziz sayyed bessemer alabama constitutional violations brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix homicide hurst mandamus mcwilliams v dunn adnan syed, bernard v north dakota Donald Trump, mountain brook alabama Shonda Walker, shooting death Gardendale Alabama OJ Simpson illegal gun carry Adamsville alabama greene county alabama Jefferson County Alabama fort payne alabama steve avery judicial override legende v state cullman alabama campbell v state parole US Supreme Court Update criminal mischief dora alabama street racing Lucky D Arcade bailey v us sheffield v state brookside alabama mccalla alabama

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.