CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.


J.D. Lloyd - Friday, May 06, 2016

Eugene Lee Jones v. State (CR-14-1332)


Jones was convicted of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder, stemming from him killing a woman he suspected of setting him up in a robbery. Jones voluntarily talked to investigators on July 29, 2013, in connection to the death, but eventually stopped the questioning when he invoked his right to counsel. Jones was arrested on an outstanding warrant out of Bessemer. Jones was eventually transported back to Lauderdale County on another warrant stemming from a charge unrelated to the homicide. While still in custody, Jones was asked to submit to a polygraph examination. Jones waived his Miranda rights, submitted to the polygraph, and subsequently made another statement in which he admitted that he strangled the victim. Jones moved to suppress this statement under Edwards v. AZ, 451 US 477 (1981) on the grounds that investigators improperly re-initiated contact after he had invoked his right to counsel. The circuit court denied the motion. AFFIRMED. Relying on MD v. Shatzer, 559 US 98 (2010), the CCA affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress on the grounds that “coercive effect” of re-initiation of interrogation wasn’t present in this case like it was in Edwards. Essentially, the Court held that if enough time has passed since the initial invocation of the right to counsel -- more than 14 days -- there is no presumptively problematic re-initiation as there was in Edwards.


Levins v. State (CR-15-0612)


Bell v. State (CR-15-0618)

The appellants in these two cases were two expungement petitioners who were denied relief at the circuit court level and asked the CCA to reverse the denials of their petitions. APPEALS DISMISSED One may only challenge the denial of their expungement petition by petitioning the Alabama Supreme Court for certiorari review of the denial of the petition for expungement.

John Earle Redfearn, IV v. State (CR-14-0500)


This case involved the denial of a motion to suppress drugs evidence recovered from Redfearn’s body. In February 2012, law enforcement obtained a search warrant of Redfearn’s residence based upon 2 controlled buys that occurred at the residence with Redfearn. Law enforcement executed the SW after they observed Redfearn drive away from the house. He was stopped several miles away while the search of the house was going on and taken back to the house by the detaining officers. While executing the warrant, Redfearn’s girlfriend arrived at the house and eventually told the officers that Redfearn keeps drugs on his person. An officer strip-searched Redfearn at the residence and recovered a bottle containing oxycodone pills in his underwear. Redfearn moved to suppress under Bailey v. US, 133 S.Ct. 1031 (2013). AFFIRMED. The CCA explained that while Bailey held that a suspect may be lawfully detained while police are conducting a search warrant only when the person is in the "immediate vicinity" of the place to be searched, Redfearn was properly detained because the police had probable cause to arrest him based upon the controlled buys previously carried out with Redfearn and observed by law enforcement.


Nathaniel Woods (CR-10-0695)

Alfonso Morris (CR-11-1925)

John Russell Calhoun (CR-14-0779)

In these three cases, the CCA affirmed the denial of Rule 32 relief for death-row inmates without holding evidentiary hearings. There’s not much that’s noteworthy in these opinions outside of the observation that the petitions were summarily denied because each petitioner failed to plead sufficient facts that, if proven true, could entitle them to relief. The vast majority of the factual claims in the three petitions were bare-boned factual allegations. In Woods and Morris, petitioners raised claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present certain expert testimony at trial. The CCA affirmed the summary dismissal of these claims because the petitioner failed to identify an expert and what that expert’s testimony would have been at the pleading stage. It bears repeating that if you’re going to raise an IAC claim, in order to be entitled to a hearing, you have to give the circuit court sufficient factual allegations that the court can conclude that your claims could entitle you to relief if proven true. In the context of IAC based on the failure to call certain expert witnesses, you need to make a proffer as to who that expert would have been and what the testimony would have been at the pleading stage.


Brian Fredick Lucas (CR-14-0744)


Lucas was convicted of first-degree attempted sodomy by forcible compulsion and first-degree sexual abuse stemming from an incident in which he allegedly touched his step-daughter on the mouth with his penis while she was sleeping. The CCA reversed his first-degree sodomy conviction on the grounds that the State’s showing did not present evidence of forcible compulsion -- there was no threat by Lucas or evidence that his actions overcame her earnest resistance. The CCA did enter a judgment convicting Lucas of attempted sexual misconduct.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


public assistance fraud illegal gambling aziz sayyed car accident Alabaster alabama greene county alabama constitutional violations homicide tuscaloosa alabama smith v state state of arizona Shonda Walker, death penalty, narcotics investigation armed robbery bomb threat pruitt v state steve avery drug seizure alfonso morris unlawful manufacturing calhoun county alabama baldwin county alabama fourth amendment New York Times sarah koenig peyton pruitt warrantless blood draws Kay Ivey apprendi v new jersey john earle redfearn IV v state § 13A-3-23 OJ Simpson moving violations second amendment home repair fraud parole criminal justice reform, Kareem Dacar Gaymon Benn v State theft baltimore city circuit court moore v texas capital offenses gun control hanceville alabama self defense terell corey mcmullin maryland court of special appeals OJ Simpson Made in America serial criminal mischief illegal gun carry dora alabama church robberies Easter ferguson missouri stanley brent chapman ake v oklahoma alabama law enforcement agency eighth amendment, lamar county dekalb county alabama avondale alabama the mannequin challenge burglary scotus shoplifting crime of passion banville v state lauderdale county alabama habeas corpus relief betton v state state of alabama christian guitierez editorial concealed carry brady v maryland morgan county alabama Neil Gorsuch Fentanyl department of justice, drug trafficking, Marengo County Alabama birmingham alabama gun rights mcwilliams v dunn aiding and abetting fort payne alabama drug crimes court of criminal appeals kidnapping endangerment of a child Joshua Reese fraudulent checks warrior alabama LWOP underage drinking christmas shooting clarence thomas russell calhoun homicide rate Guy Terrell Junior economic growth operation bullseye keith v state texas utah supreme court cherokee county alabama florence alabama shelby county ring v arizona court of criminal appeal releases sentencing law and policy blog summaries hurst mandamus brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix anniston alabama, Rule 32 28 U.S.C. § 2254 abduction Tommy Arthur § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing attempted murder blountsville alabama kimberly alabama eleventh circuit ruling south carolina forced isolation domestic abuse morris alabama Jefferson County Alabama hurst v florida brookside alabama lethal injection drugs legende v state Alonzo Ephraim Lucky D Arcade CCA update social media negligent homicide Thomas Hardiman drug possession, mike gilotti Gardendale Alabama rainbow city alabama Stephen Breyer 2016 election, Tracie Todd ex parte briseno Mike Hubbard fraud alabama criminal law roundup lethal injection mount olive alabama implied consent eric sterling animal cruelty alabama supreme court prostitution sting Woods v State foley alabama strickland v washington nicholas hawkins drug activity mountain brook alabama hoax destructive devices towles v state kenneth eugene billups marion county criminal justice mccalla alabama cullman alabama st clair county alabama beylund v north dakota robberies breaking and entering Briarwood Presbyterian Church dothan alabama pinson alabama levins v state sixth amendment pelham alabama debtor prison huntsville alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth Ingmire v State capital punishment abandonment nathan woods fake kidnapping, limestone county alabama jerry bohannon madison alabama fultondale alabama hoover alabama murder road rage drug smuggling Adamsville alabama abuse mobile alabama adger alabama heflin alabama Xavier Beasley talladega superspeedway Eutaw Alabama Walker County Alabama Glaze v State bernard v north dakota capital murder bessemer alabama Etowah County Alabama, sheffield v state judicial override Malone v State brendan dassey shooting arson court systems, street racing montgomery alabama operation crackdown Sardis Alabama albertville alabama pell city alabama department of justice tarrant alabama utah v strieff npr felony assaults oneonta alabama springville alabama minor offenses SCOTUS, Donald Trump, huntsville mulga alabama gadsden alabama brian fredick lucas death penalty netflix constitutional law, US Supreme Court Update blount county alabama alabama Justice Sotomayor embezzlement executions midazolam sexual assault Dylann Roof fairfield alabama, battles v state shooting death adnan syed, assault Pleasant Grove Alabama heritage christian university William Pryor theft of property hall v florida debit card skimming scams asia mcclain eugene lee jones v state identity theft boaz alabama bailey v us birchfield v north dakota domestic violence Samuel Alito Hillary Clinton, decatur alabama making a murderer benjamin todd acton stoves v state trussville alabama campbell v state edwards v arizona drug busts West Alabama



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.