CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA CASELAW UPDATE - APRIL 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, May 06, 2016


Eugene Lee Jones v. State (CR-14-1332)

 

Jones was convicted of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder, stemming from him killing a woman he suspected of setting him up in a robbery. Jones voluntarily talked to investigators on July 29, 2013, in connection to the death, but eventually stopped the questioning when he invoked his right to counsel. Jones was arrested on an outstanding warrant out of Bessemer. Jones was eventually transported back to Lauderdale County on another warrant stemming from a charge unrelated to the homicide. While still in custody, Jones was asked to submit to a polygraph examination. Jones waived his Miranda rights, submitted to the polygraph, and subsequently made another statement in which he admitted that he strangled the victim. Jones moved to suppress this statement under Edwards v. AZ, 451 US 477 (1981) on the grounds that investigators improperly re-initiated contact after he had invoked his right to counsel. The circuit court denied the motion. AFFIRMED. Relying on MD v. Shatzer, 559 US 98 (2010), the CCA affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress on the grounds that “coercive effect” of re-initiation of interrogation wasn’t present in this case like it was in Edwards. Essentially, the Court held that if enough time has passed since the initial invocation of the right to counsel -- more than 14 days -- there is no presumptively problematic re-initiation as there was in Edwards.

 

Levins v. State (CR-15-0612)

 

Bell v. State (CR-15-0618)


The appellants in these two cases were two expungement petitioners who were denied relief at the circuit court level and asked the CCA to reverse the denials of their petitions. APPEALS DISMISSED One may only challenge the denial of their expungement petition by petitioning the Alabama Supreme Court for certiorari review of the denial of the petition for expungement.


John Earle Redfearn, IV v. State (CR-14-0500)

 

This case involved the denial of a motion to suppress drugs evidence recovered from Redfearn’s body. In February 2012, law enforcement obtained a search warrant of Redfearn’s residence based upon 2 controlled buys that occurred at the residence with Redfearn. Law enforcement executed the SW after they observed Redfearn drive away from the house. He was stopped several miles away while the search of the house was going on and taken back to the house by the detaining officers. While executing the warrant, Redfearn’s girlfriend arrived at the house and eventually told the officers that Redfearn keeps drugs on his person. An officer strip-searched Redfearn at the residence and recovered a bottle containing oxycodone pills in his underwear. Redfearn moved to suppress under Bailey v. US, 133 S.Ct. 1031 (2013). AFFIRMED. The CCA explained that while Bailey held that a suspect may be lawfully detained while police are conducting a search warrant only when the person is in the "immediate vicinity" of the place to be searched, Redfearn was properly detained because the police had probable cause to arrest him based upon the controlled buys previously carried out with Redfearn and observed by law enforcement.

 

Nathaniel Woods (CR-10-0695)


Alfonso Morris (CR-11-1925)


John Russell Calhoun (CR-14-0779)

In these three cases, the CCA affirmed the denial of Rule 32 relief for death-row inmates without holding evidentiary hearings. There’s not much that’s noteworthy in these opinions outside of the observation that the petitions were summarily denied because each petitioner failed to plead sufficient facts that, if proven true, could entitle them to relief. The vast majority of the factual claims in the three petitions were bare-boned factual allegations. In Woods and Morris, petitioners raised claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present certain expert testimony at trial. The CCA affirmed the summary dismissal of these claims because the petitioner failed to identify an expert and what that expert’s testimony would have been at the pleading stage. It bears repeating that if you’re going to raise an IAC claim, in order to be entitled to a hearing, you have to give the circuit court sufficient factual allegations that the court can conclude that your claims could entitle you to relief if proven true. In the context of IAC based on the failure to call certain expert witnesses, you need to make a proffer as to who that expert would have been and what the testimony would have been at the pleading stage.

 

Brian Fredick Lucas (CR-14-0744)

 

Lucas was convicted of first-degree attempted sodomy by forcible compulsion and first-degree sexual abuse stemming from an incident in which he allegedly touched his step-daughter on the mouth with his penis while she was sleeping. The CCA reversed his first-degree sodomy conviction on the grounds that the State’s showing did not present evidence of forcible compulsion -- there was no threat by Lucas or evidence that his actions overcame her earnest resistance. The CCA did enter a judgment convicting Lucas of attempted sexual misconduct.

 

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



 


Recent Posts


Tags

heritage christian university hurst v florida aziz sayyed Joshua Reese alfonso morris mccalla alabama Etowah County Alabama, department of justice constitutional law, john earle redfearn IV v state eleventh circuit ruling Benn v State smith v state home repair fraud economic growth felony assaults fultondale alabama russell calhoun endangerment of a child brookside alabama baltimore city circuit court LWOP cherokee county alabama hoover alabama breaking and entering morgan county alabama south carolina boaz alabama assault oneonta alabama abandonment midazolam unlawful manufacturing gun control social media bomb threat shelby county operation crackdown Lucky D Arcade Kay Ivey adger alabama street racing dothan alabama pelham alabama beylund v north dakota moving violations alabama supreme court rainbow city alabama Malone v State OJ Simpson texas robberies public assistance fraud alabama criminal law roundup minor offenses burglary eighth amendment, Justice Sotomayor Ingmire v State decatur alabama albertville alabama death penalty Gardendale Alabama Samuel Alito netflix morris alabama drug smuggling state of arizona mountain brook alabama illegal gun carry mobile alabama npr mount olive alabama tarrant alabama eugene lee jones v state aiding and abetting drug seizure Walker County Alabama limestone county alabama Hillary Clinton, bessemer alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon capital offenses prostitution sting criminal justice reform, montgomery alabama eric sterling terell corey mcmullin Pleasant Grove Alabama nathan woods § 13A-3-23 state of alabama hurst mandamus shooting death birchfield v north dakota criminal mischief abduction armed robbery implied consent utah v strieff executions birmingham alabama blount county alabama illegal gambling Adamsville alabama drug trafficking, concealed carry Jefferson County Alabama ferguson missouri tuscaloosa alabama forced isolation asia mcclain moore v texas brian fredick lucas theft bailey v us steve avery fraud judicial override William Pryor constitutional violations talladega superspeedway making a murderer death penalty, debit card skimming scams Neil Gorsuch jerry bohannon fake kidnapping, narcotics investigation Dylann Roof Mike Hubbard abuse sheffield v state hall v florida Shonda Walker, levins v state Tommy Arthur alabama foley alabama Rule 32 domestic violence huntsville alabama hanceville alabama gadsden alabama embezzlement blountsville alabama bernard v north dakota sexual assault peyton pruitt lamar county murder Eutaw Alabama arson criminal justice road rage christian guitierez 2016 election, Alonzo Ephraim heflin alabama CCA update animal cruelty kimberly alabama utah supreme court sarah koenig scotus capital murder warrantless blood draws springville alabama ex parte briseno Wesley Adam Whitworth Briarwood Presbyterian Church kenneth eugene billups st clair county alabama banville v state kidnapping SCOTUS, New York Times anniston alabama, Donald Trump, marion county pruitt v state domestic abuse madison alabama identity theft § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing serial mcwilliams v dunn Fentanyl US Supreme Court Update towles v state West Alabama drug possession, crime of passion pinson alabama trussville alabama OJ Simpson Made in America huntsville Guy Terrell Junior clarence thomas fraudulent checks sixth amendment hoax destructive devices cullman alabama drug busts brady v maryland dekalb county alabama christmas shooting stanley brent chapman court systems, court of criminal appeals homicide rate second amendment Thomas Hardiman editorial homicide brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix ake v oklahoma capital punishment maryland court of special appeals lethal injection drugs lauderdale county alabama negligent homicide calhoun county alabama alabama law enforcement agency legende v state Glaze v State fourth amendment campbell v state 28 U.S.C. § 2254 brendan dassey self defense adnan syed, shoplifting pell city alabama drug activity Tracie Todd underage drinking edwards v arizona Alabaster alabama Easter Sardis Alabama drug crimes betton v state theft of property ring v arizona florence alabama shooting church robberies greene county alabama parole strickland v washington Stephen Breyer stoves v state apprendi v new jersey operation bullseye attempted murder fairfield alabama, Xavier Beasley avondale alabama court of criminal appeal releases car accident nicholas hawkins warrior alabama mike gilotti dora alabama Marengo County Alabama the mannequin challenge department of justice, fort payne alabama habeas corpus relief benjamin todd acton mulga alabama baldwin county alabama lethal injection debtor prison gun rights battles v state sentencing law and policy blog summaries keith v state Woods v State

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.