CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.


J.D. Lloyd - Friday, May 06, 2016

Eugene Lee Jones v. State (CR-14-1332)


Jones was convicted of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder, stemming from him killing a woman he suspected of setting him up in a robbery. Jones voluntarily talked to investigators on July 29, 2013, in connection to the death, but eventually stopped the questioning when he invoked his right to counsel. Jones was arrested on an outstanding warrant out of Bessemer. Jones was eventually transported back to Lauderdale County on another warrant stemming from a charge unrelated to the homicide. While still in custody, Jones was asked to submit to a polygraph examination. Jones waived his Miranda rights, submitted to the polygraph, and subsequently made another statement in which he admitted that he strangled the victim. Jones moved to suppress this statement under Edwards v. AZ, 451 US 477 (1981) on the grounds that investigators improperly re-initiated contact after he had invoked his right to counsel. The circuit court denied the motion. AFFIRMED. Relying on MD v. Shatzer, 559 US 98 (2010), the CCA affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress on the grounds that “coercive effect” of re-initiation of interrogation wasn’t present in this case like it was in Edwards. Essentially, the Court held that if enough time has passed since the initial invocation of the right to counsel -- more than 14 days -- there is no presumptively problematic re-initiation as there was in Edwards.


Levins v. State (CR-15-0612)


Bell v. State (CR-15-0618)

The appellants in these two cases were two expungement petitioners who were denied relief at the circuit court level and asked the CCA to reverse the denials of their petitions. APPEALS DISMISSED One may only challenge the denial of their expungement petition by petitioning the Alabama Supreme Court for certiorari review of the denial of the petition for expungement.

John Earle Redfearn, IV v. State (CR-14-0500)


This case involved the denial of a motion to suppress drugs evidence recovered from Redfearn’s body. In February 2012, law enforcement obtained a search warrant of Redfearn’s residence based upon 2 controlled buys that occurred at the residence with Redfearn. Law enforcement executed the SW after they observed Redfearn drive away from the house. He was stopped several miles away while the search of the house was going on and taken back to the house by the detaining officers. While executing the warrant, Redfearn’s girlfriend arrived at the house and eventually told the officers that Redfearn keeps drugs on his person. An officer strip-searched Redfearn at the residence and recovered a bottle containing oxycodone pills in his underwear. Redfearn moved to suppress under Bailey v. US, 133 S.Ct. 1031 (2013). AFFIRMED. The CCA explained that while Bailey held that a suspect may be lawfully detained while police are conducting a search warrant only when the person is in the "immediate vicinity" of the place to be searched, Redfearn was properly detained because the police had probable cause to arrest him based upon the controlled buys previously carried out with Redfearn and observed by law enforcement.


Nathaniel Woods (CR-10-0695)

Alfonso Morris (CR-11-1925)

John Russell Calhoun (CR-14-0779)

In these three cases, the CCA affirmed the denial of Rule 32 relief for death-row inmates without holding evidentiary hearings. There’s not much that’s noteworthy in these opinions outside of the observation that the petitions were summarily denied because each petitioner failed to plead sufficient facts that, if proven true, could entitle them to relief. The vast majority of the factual claims in the three petitions were bare-boned factual allegations. In Woods and Morris, petitioners raised claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present certain expert testimony at trial. The CCA affirmed the summary dismissal of these claims because the petitioner failed to identify an expert and what that expert’s testimony would have been at the pleading stage. It bears repeating that if you’re going to raise an IAC claim, in order to be entitled to a hearing, you have to give the circuit court sufficient factual allegations that the court can conclude that your claims could entitle you to relief if proven true. In the context of IAC based on the failure to call certain expert witnesses, you need to make a proffer as to who that expert would have been and what the testimony would have been at the pleading stage.


Brian Fredick Lucas (CR-14-0744)


Lucas was convicted of first-degree attempted sodomy by forcible compulsion and first-degree sexual abuse stemming from an incident in which he allegedly touched his step-daughter on the mouth with his penis while she was sleeping. The CCA reversed his first-degree sodomy conviction on the grounds that the State’s showing did not present evidence of forcible compulsion -- there was no threat by Lucas or evidence that his actions overcame her earnest resistance. The CCA did enter a judgment convicting Lucas of attempted sexual misconduct.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Alabama Supreme Court Ruling Makes Illegal Hunting Prosecutions Tougher for the State

J.D. Lloyd - Saturday, October 31, 2015
The Alabama Supreme Court released an interesting opinion reversing some hunting-offense convictions today. In Ex parte Ex parte W.F., W.L.C., and R.J.J. the Court threw out the youthful offenders convictions for hunting after dark, hunting from a public road, and hunting with the aid of an automobile.
As deer season approaches, all the hunters out there might want to pay close attention:
Basically, a conservation officer believed he heard shots being fired from a truck driven by these defendants around 6:30/6:45 at night. He didn't see anyone fire a weapon or even a muzzle flash --essentially, he only heard what he thought were shots fired from a gun. No shell casings were recovered and the deputy sheriff that later investigated couldn't determine whether shots had recently been fired from the rifle found in the defendant's vehicle.
The defense argued the State couldn't make a prima facie case based on this paltry evidence. The State relied on Rogers v. State, 491 So. 2d 987 (Ala. Crim. App. 1985) to defend the sufficiency of its showing, which held that the State presents a sufficient case of "night hunting" when it shows "that the accused (1) is in an area which deer or other protected animals are thought to frequent, (2) has in his possession a light, and (3) has in his possession a weapon or other device suitable for taking, capturing, or killing an animal protected by state law, (4) at night." The circuit court and Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, relying on Rogers for all the offenses.
The Court rejected Rogers on the theory that attempts to commit these hunting offenses require more than the Rogers standard provides. The Court's discussion here is an interesting look into  "the commencement of consummation" of a criminal offense, focusing on the holding of ATM v. State, 804 So. 2d 171 (Ala. 2000). Because Rogers did not accurately encompass "attempt" jurisprudence, the Court overruled that decision. In applying the accurate law regarding attempts, the Court found the State's case insufficient and vacated and rendered the convictions.
This case is a great standard for assessing the sufficiency of "attempt" prosecutions.


If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.

Recent Posts


mountain brook alabama Ingmire v State decatur alabama oneonta alabama Thomas Hardiman lauderdale county alabama economic growth eric sterling battles v state hurst mandamus christmas shooting Samuel Alito § 13A-3-23 sarah koenig cullman alabama hanceville alabama lamar county blountsville alabama Easter death penalty, calhoun county alabama pruitt v state criminal mischief fultondale alabama smith v state debit card skimming scams breaking and entering kenneth eugene billups drug possession, gun rights Mike Hubbard William Pryor adnan syed, mcwilliams v dunn dekalb county alabama Etowah County Alabama, foley alabama scotus abduction theft of property ferguson missouri alabama criminal law roundup fraud theft capital offenses Tommy Arthur unlawful manufacturing limestone county alabama avondale alabama texas attempted murder benjamin todd acton judicial override baltimore city circuit court beylund v north dakota hoover alabama illegal gun carry mount olive alabama rainbow city alabama utah supreme court bessemer alabama kimberly alabama US Supreme Court Update boaz alabama midazolam mccalla alabama pelham alabama street racing nathan woods sentencing law and policy blog summaries moving violations drug activity Joshua Reese homicide rate department of justice, hurst v florida albertville alabama negligent homicide fourth amendment domestic violence abandonment gadsden alabama jerry bohannon eugene lee jones v state Alonzo Ephraim SCOTUS, Sardis Alabama implied consent huntsville stanley brent chapman mobile alabama court systems, animal cruelty shooting banville v state nicholas hawkins eleventh circuit ruling OJ Simpson Made in America death penalty operation crackdown aziz sayyed warrantless blood draws pinson alabama court of criminal appeal releases operation bullseye bernard v north dakota domestic abuse social media burglary cherokee county alabama Neil Gorsuch court of criminal appeals executions alabama law enforcement agency Hillary Clinton, armed robbery shelby county hall v florida Donald Trump, south carolina utah v strieff parole adger alabama maryland court of special appeals Guy Terrell Junior john earle redfearn IV v state Xavier Beasley tarrant alabama Eutaw Alabama homicide Pleasant Grove Alabama narcotics investigation drug trafficking, endangerment of a child criminal justice car accident § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing capital punishment fake kidnapping, fort payne alabama towles v state talladega superspeedway concealed carry tuscaloosa alabama campbell v state debtor prison Rule 32 lethal injection aiding and abetting Kay Ivey brian fredick lucas forced isolation Justice Sotomayor brookside alabama second amendment levins v state Marengo County Alabama assault sexual assault capital murder department of justice state of alabama springville alabama fairfield alabama, steve avery Jefferson County Alabama minor offenses betton v state ake v oklahoma shoplifting ring v arizona habeas corpus relief LWOP Shonda Walker, strickland v washington gun control Tracie Todd making a murderer Lucky D Arcade asia mcclain Briarwood Presbyterian Church sheffield v state criminal justice reform, the mannequin challenge robberies heflin alabama marion county birmingham alabama blount county alabama constitutional violations alfonso morris edwards v arizona OJ Simpson npr ex parte briseno CCA update self defense Kareem Dacar Gaymon brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix bailey v us pell city alabama kidnapping public assistance fraud heritage christian university warrior alabama Gardendale Alabama 2016 election, stoves v state netflix Stephen Breyer West Alabama underage drinking murder hoax destructive devices felony assaults alabama supreme court greene county alabama Glaze v State clarence thomas apprendi v new jersey madison alabama Walker County Alabama huntsville alabama morgan county alabama state of arizona fraudulent checks crime of passion Alabaster alabama christian guitierez alabama abuse road rage 28 U.S.C. § 2254 moore v texas Benn v State anniston alabama, embezzlement sixth amendment drug crimes church robberies florence alabama Woods v State peyton pruitt serial mulga alabama drug smuggling legende v state Fentanyl Wesley Adam Whitworth birchfield v north dakota drug busts New York Times russell calhoun dora alabama identity theft terell corey mcmullin lethal injection drugs Adamsville alabama illegal gambling eighth amendment, Dylann Roof bomb threat mike gilotti baldwin county alabama prostitution sting st clair county alabama keith v state brady v maryland trussville alabama Malone v State dothan alabama montgomery alabama morris alabama shooting death editorial home repair fraud constitutional law, drug seizure brendan dassey arson



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.