CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

High Court Reverses Another Alabama Death Sentence

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, June 19, 2017


McWilliams v. Dunn, Comm’r ALDOC

 

Question Presented: Did Alabama courts wrongfully conclude McWilliams was not denied meaningful assistance from a mental-health expert under Ake v. Oklahoma?

 

Facts

 

McWilliams was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death for a 1994 robbery/rape/murder that took place in a convenience store in Tuscaloosa. McWilliams’ mental health was explored in depth during the course of his trial. He was examined by a “Lunacy Commission” composed of three doctors at Taylor Hardin Secure Medical Facility. After he was convicted and after the jury recommended he be sentenced to death by a vote of 10-2, McWilliams asked for neurological and neuropsychological exams. The court order a Dr. John Goff, a neuropsychologist with the State, to examine McWilliams. However, Dr. Goff’s findings were not based on a complete review of his mental health records. His report was given to McWilliams only 48 hours before the judicial sentencing phase. On the eve of the judicial sentencing hearing, Taylor Hardin and Holman Prison sent defense counsel updated records which had been subpoenaed months before. Trial counsel continuously asked the trial court for an independent expert and a continuance, but these requests were rejected.

 

Eventually, McWilliams case arrived in federal court when he filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief. Among other issues, McWilliams argued that the State deprived him of Due Process under Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 (1985). McWilliams argued this denial was a violation of “clearly established federal law” and thus entitled him to habeas corpus relief. The district court denied the request.

 

Ake v. Oklahoma

In Ake, the Court ruled that the Constitution requires the State to provide an indigent defendant with “assistance necessary to prepare an effective defense based on his mental condition” if the defendant’s sanity is in question. The ruling was framed around the concept of the “meaningful access to justice.” The expert should “assist in evaluation, preparation, and presentation of the defense.”

 

Eleventh Circuit Ruling

The Eleventh Circuit denied relief. Initially, the Court concluded that McWilliams failed to meet his burden of showing that “clearly established federal law” entitled him to an independent expert. The Eleventh Circuit noted a split in the circuits regarding whether Ake requires the appointment of an independent expert and that the Supreme Court had never resolved that split. Because the split existed, there was, in the Court’s opinion, no clearly established federal law that could entitled McWilliams relief on this claim. Additionally, the court concluded that the State courts’ determination that Ake had been satisfied was likewise not an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law.

 

Judge Wilson’s dissent

Judge Wilson believed that Ake was not satisfied here. First, the State failed to provide meaningful psychological assistance. McWilliams did not receive any expert assistance until after the sentencing hearing held before the jury. Second, the assistance McWilliams received from Dr. Goff was based on an incomplete review of the mental health records available for consideration. In Judge Wilson’s opinion, this paltry showing did not satisfy Ake and warrants habeas corpus relief.

 

Supreme Court Ruling

The Court ruled that in the particular circumstances of this case, McWilliams’ rights under Ake were not protected. The Court declined to answer the more specific question of whether Ake requires appointment of a mental health expert who is independent of the prosecution because Alabama failed to satisfy “Ake’s most basic requirements.”

 

The Court rejected Alabama’s argument that it complied with Ake by allowing Dr. Goff to examine McWilliams. Ake requires more: “[1] examination and assist in [2] evaluation, [3] preparation, and [4] presentation of the defense.” The Court concluded that even if it were to assume the State satisfied the “examination” requirement, it completely failed to satisfy the last three prongs.

 

While the 11th Circuit had ruled that whatever error McWilliams suffered was “harmless,” the Supreme Court noted that ruling was limited to just the question of whether the requested continuance would have made a difference in McWilliams sentencing. The Court pointed out that on remand the 11th Circuit should consider how the State’s failure to guarantee the remaining three prongs of Ake would have made a difference in McWilliams’ case.

 

Dissent (Alito, Roberts, Thomas, Gorsuch)

The dissent would have had the Court address the narrow question of whether it is clearly established federal law that Ake requires the appointment of an independent mental health expert. The dissent complains that Alabama didn’t have a chance to address the question the Court actually addressed. However, this simply isn’t true. Alabama briefed the merits of the underlying Ake claim at the merits stage.

 

The 11th Circuit on Remand

The Eleventh Circuit is likely to kick the case back down to the district court to address the full Ake question. It’s hard to see McWilliams’ death sentence standing when the Supreme Court has all but said 3 aspects of Ake weren’t satisfied here.

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 


Recent Posts


Tags

florence alabama US Supreme Court Update § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing economic growth CCA update montgomery alabama capital punishment Ingmire v State gadsden alabama road rage Donald Trump, hoax destructive devices nathan woods blount county alabama Guy Terrell Junior brookside alabama levins v state bessemer alabama 2016 election, eric sterling drug seizure betton v state apprendi v new jersey huntsville alabama lethal injection drugs huntsville alabama drug possession, bernard v north dakota brian fredick lucas public assistance fraud making a murderer LWOP domestic violence domestic abuse pinson alabama embezzlement capital offenses Marengo County Alabama npr street racing the mannequin challenge springville alabama banville v state moving violations drug activity ferguson missouri homicide midazolam lamar county smith v state second amendment avondale alabama prostitution sting department of justice, eugene lee jones v state mulga alabama russell calhoun dekalb county alabama trussville alabama shoplifting christmas shooting § 13A-3-23 Woods v State talladega superspeedway drug smuggling bailey v us utah supreme court arson West Alabama st clair county alabama edwards v arizona capital murder parole decatur alabama church robberies Alonzo Ephraim burglary fraud aiding and abetting Malone v State steve avery minor offenses brady v maryland Fentanyl OJ Simpson calhoun county alabama William Pryor ake v oklahoma campbell v state Justice Sotomayor unlawful manufacturing gun control Xavier Beasley cullman alabama armed robbery Thomas Hardiman operation bullseye illegal gambling battles v state Pleasant Grove Alabama rainbow city alabama dothan alabama netflix heflin alabama madison alabama Benn v State Easter serial blountsville alabama court of criminal appeals birchfield v north dakota alfonso morris debtor prison Stephen Breyer criminal mischief limestone county alabama heritage christian university crime of passion bomb threat christian guitierez drug busts beylund v north dakota towles v state judicial override hurst v florida lethal injection death penalty death penalty, shooting death Samuel Alito abduction asia mcclain shelby county criminal justice reform, fairfield alabama, pell city alabama Tracie Todd foley alabama editorial ring v arizona keith v state 28 U.S.C. § 2254 sixth amendment adnan syed, Hillary Clinton, Gardendale Alabama state of arizona sentencing law and policy blog summaries Joshua Reese scotus murder animal cruelty ex parte briseno sexual assault adger alabama Mike Hubbard department of justice fake kidnapping, Shonda Walker, morris alabama Tommy Arthur underage drinking legende v state theft Neil Gorsuch hanceville alabama Adamsville alabama mike gilotti anniston alabama, hall v florida New York Times eleventh circuit ruling baltimore city circuit court kimberly alabama benjamin todd acton warrior alabama fultondale alabama Rule 32 pruitt v state identity theft stanley brent chapman home repair fraud Jefferson County Alabama kidnapping OJ Simpson Made in America kenneth eugene billups constitutional law, alabama supreme court breaking and entering tarrant alabama debit card skimming scams Lucky D Arcade sheffield v state birmingham alabama fort payne alabama illegal gun carry abuse court of criminal appeal releases stoves v state endangerment of a child brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix maryland court of special appeals cherokee county alabama lauderdale county alabama implied consent shooting operation crackdown sarah koenig car accident drug trafficking, narcotics investigation homicide rate peyton pruitt mcwilliams v dunn Walker County Alabama fraudulent checks warrantless blood draws Alabaster alabama executions assault boaz alabama texas habeas corpus relief Wesley Adam Whitworth state of alabama baldwin county alabama aziz sayyed Kareem Dacar Gaymon mobile alabama john earle redfearn IV v state nicholas hawkins theft of property fourth amendment Sardis Alabama tuscaloosa alabama albertville alabama abandonment hoover alabama greene county alabama oneonta alabama terell corey mcmullin self defense Kay Ivey brendan dassey constitutional violations court systems, eighth amendment, Glaze v State gun rights concealed carry jerry bohannon utah v strieff moore v texas dora alabama felony assaults social media Dylann Roof pelham alabama marion county morgan county alabama south carolina SCOTUS, forced isolation mount olive alabama robberies mccalla alabama criminal justice alabama criminal law roundup negligent homicide hurst mandamus strickland v washington drug crimes mountain brook alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church Eutaw Alabama Etowah County Alabama, attempted murder alabama law enforcement agency clarence thomas

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.