CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016

Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.

2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.


Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)

Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.

Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)

In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).


Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)


Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.


Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)

Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.


Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)


This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State


If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


eugene lee jones v state Sardis Alabama heritage christian university hanceville alabama benjamin todd acton keith v state fourth amendment marion county cullman alabama alabama supreme court mccalla alabama debtor prison blount county alabama ex parte briseno eleventh circuit ruling kimberly alabama warrantless blood draws Alonzo Ephraim Glaze v State boaz alabama habeas corpus relief Pleasant Grove Alabama campbell v state Thomas Hardiman heflin alabama cherokee county alabama economic growth mcwilliams v dunn Samuel Alito john earle redfearn IV v state shelby county decatur alabama LWOP armed robbery prostitution sting attempted murder pell city alabama serial Stephen Breyer huntsville Donald Trump, talladega superspeedway drug crimes kidnapping department of justice, hurst v florida OJ Simpson Made in America the mannequin challenge greene county alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon drug activity netflix bomb threat lamar county Xavier Beasley fraudulent checks sheffield v state rainbow city alabama criminal justice theft beylund v north dakota death penalty ring v arizona foley alabama SCOTUS, drug seizure identity theft street racing capital offenses Neil Gorsuch dora alabama state of arizona brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix 28 U.S.C. § 2254 unlawful manufacturing Briarwood Presbyterian Church endangerment of a child murder operation crackdown Easter car accident arson second amendment springville alabama CCA update drug trafficking, gadsden alabama brendan dassey home repair fraud birmingham alabama maryland court of special appeals assault jerry bohannon eighth amendment, betton v state baltimore city circuit court shooting death eric sterling operation bullseye social media strickland v washington alfonso morris npr pinson alabama court of criminal appeals debit card skimming scams homicide albertville alabama scotus hoax destructive devices legende v state Tommy Arthur bailey v us Guy Terrell Junior Shonda Walker, hall v florida peyton pruitt brian fredick lucas sexual assault limestone county alabama judicial override smith v state church robberies underage drinking tarrant alabama public assistance fraud Joshua Reese Adamsville alabama Ingmire v State Wesley Adam Whitworth morgan county alabama fraud Benn v State pruitt v state fort payne alabama West Alabama brady v maryland adnan syed, russell calhoun crime of passion edwards v arizona Malone v State terell corey mcmullin executions christian guitierez apprendi v new jersey OJ Simpson court systems, homicide rate New York Times fairfield alabama, anniston alabama, forced isolation Fentanyl sixth amendment capital punishment constitutional violations department of justice alabama criminal law roundup Marengo County Alabama alabama drug smuggling death penalty, hurst mandamus court of criminal appeal releases birchfield v north dakota south carolina aziz sayyed breaking and entering abuse minor offenses abduction bessemer alabama mulga alabama tuscaloosa alabama mike gilotti theft of property moore v texas animal cruelty Eutaw Alabama montgomery alabama aiding and abetting fultondale alabama clarence thomas Justice Sotomayor gun control negligent homicide road rage st clair county alabama mountain brook alabama drug possession, shooting lethal injection drugs lethal injection battles v state bernard v north dakota texas Gardendale Alabama dothan alabama implied consent blountsville alabama nicholas hawkins self defense Jefferson County Alabama felony assaults asia mcclain William Pryor oneonta alabama ferguson missouri moving violations calhoun county alabama madison alabama Tracie Todd gun rights adger alabama warrior alabama baldwin county alabama shoplifting constitutional law, lauderdale county alabama concealed carry trussville alabama Walker County Alabama ake v oklahoma sentencing law and policy blog summaries US Supreme Court Update sarah koenig capital murder avondale alabama Mike Hubbard kenneth eugene billups midazolam domestic abuse stanley brent chapman domestic violence Woods v State nathan woods § 13A-3-23 morris alabama Lucky D Arcade illegal gun carry abandonment mobile alabama mount olive alabama pelham alabama narcotics investigation criminal justice reform, 2016 election, burglary Hillary Clinton, stoves v state making a murderer state of alabama banville v state brookside alabama editorial Kay Ivey embezzlement alabama law enforcement agency dekalb county alabama levins v state christmas shooting Dylann Roof hoover alabama robberies Etowah County Alabama, criminal mischief fake kidnapping, drug busts florence alabama parole utah v strieff steve avery Rule 32 utah supreme court § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing huntsville alabama Alabaster alabama towles v state illegal gambling



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.