CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016


Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.

 


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.


2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.

 

Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)


Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.


Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)


In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).

 

Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)

 

Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.

 

Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)


Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.

 

Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)

 

This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

dekalb county alabama sixth amendment trussville alabama Donald Trump, hanceville alabama gun control adnan syed, stanley brent chapman towles v state brookside alabama OJ Simpson Made in America state of alabama death penalty burglary foley alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing criminal mischief court of criminal appeals implied consent Tracie Todd edwards v arizona legende v state baltimore city circuit court drug activity court systems, Samuel Alito self defense eugene lee jones v state social media unlawful manufacturing peyton pruitt drug busts capital offenses huntsville alabama gun rights home repair fraud US Supreme Court Update Xavier Beasley theft of property Adamsville alabama executions adger alabama shelby county drug seizure hall v florida Guy Terrell Junior heritage christian university strickland v washington alabama supreme court death penalty, department of justice mobile alabama mike gilotti Malone v State constitutional violations hoover alabama cullman alabama department of justice, albertville alabama steve avery abduction moving violations operation bullseye battles v state bessemer alabama Ingmire v State lethal injection drugs Jefferson County Alabama brendan dassey mount olive alabama drug smuggling bailey v us Lucky D Arcade montgomery alabama robberies mccalla alabama West Alabama Fentanyl dothan alabama narcotics investigation 2016 election, Neil Gorsuch nicholas hawkins prostitution sting second amendment Joshua Reese warrantless blood draws aiding and abetting ring v arizona alfonso morris john earle redfearn IV v state drug possession, debit card skimming scams warrior alabama springville alabama blount county alabama lethal injection pell city alabama car accident pinson alabama sexual assault street racing fraud tarrant alabama editorial rainbow city alabama Sardis Alabama kimberly alabama greene county alabama huntsville fairfield alabama, shooting death anniston alabama, animal cruelty sheffield v state levins v state William Pryor lauderdale county alabama avondale alabama eleventh circuit ruling constitutional law, negligent homicide Glaze v State utah v strieff state of arizona concealed carry criminal justice ferguson missouri road rage beylund v north dakota Wesley Adam Whitworth florence alabama terell corey mcmullin court of criminal appeal releases jerry bohannon Mike Hubbard baldwin county alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama LWOP christmas shooting drug crimes heflin alabama homicide rate Shonda Walker, Marengo County Alabama calhoun county alabama clarence thomas alabama law enforcement agency Benn v State mcwilliams v dunn bernard v north dakota campbell v state fraudulent checks armed robbery banville v state keith v state eric sterling identity theft hurst v florida Hillary Clinton, abandonment § 13A-3-23 parole crime of passion domestic violence fourth amendment Alabaster alabama murder Rule 32 hoax destructive devices endangerment of a child abuse drug trafficking, birchfield v north dakota breaking and entering underage drinking kidnapping utah supreme court Dylann Roof attempted murder brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix npr alabama the mannequin challenge theft netflix sarah koenig mulga alabama lamar county Tommy Arthur homicide ex parte briseno forced isolation shooting illegal gun carry making a murderer alabama criminal law roundup SCOTUS, st clair county alabama brady v maryland Stephen Breyer arson birmingham alabama maryland court of special appeals midazolam betton v state christian guitierez kenneth eugene billups Eutaw Alabama domestic abuse cherokee county alabama economic growth morgan county alabama Kay Ivey morris alabama habeas corpus relief minor offenses Etowah County Alabama, Walker County Alabama Gardendale Alabama fultondale alabama texas Thomas Hardiman illegal gambling dora alabama Alonzo Ephraim smith v state fake kidnapping, blountsville alabama decatur alabama tuscaloosa alabama boaz alabama madison alabama operation crackdown mountain brook alabama pruitt v state serial felony assaults oneonta alabama Easter limestone county alabama fort payne alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon church robberies capital punishment debtor prison stoves v state pelham alabama criminal justice reform, aziz sayyed assault OJ Simpson New York Times 28 U.S.C. § 2254 talladega superspeedway gadsden alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church bomb threat moore v texas marion county russell calhoun asia mcclain CCA update scotus capital murder public assistance fraud ake v oklahoma apprendi v new jersey Justice Sotomayor brian fredick lucas Woods v State judicial override embezzlement nathan woods sentencing law and policy blog summaries shoplifting hurst mandamus eighth amendment, south carolina benjamin todd acton

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.