CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016

Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.

2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.


Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)

Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.

Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)

In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).


Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)


Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.


Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)

Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.


Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)


This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State


If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


peyton pruitt Lucky D Arcade lethal injection drugs stoves v state dekalb county alabama scotus animal cruelty fraud abuse beylund v north dakota Ingmire v State constitutional violations asia mcclain christmas shooting domestic abuse capital punishment economic growth gun control debit card skimming scams executions oneonta alabama serial narcotics investigation Donald Trump, Rule 32 Jefferson County Alabama domestic violence blount county alabama baldwin county alabama hoax destructive devices second amendment identity theft albertville alabama tarrant alabama shoplifting st clair county alabama maryland court of special appeals alabama supreme court fake kidnapping, shelby county alabama criminal law roundup Xavier Beasley cullman alabama shooting shooting death brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix mike gilotti ferguson missouri aiding and abetting rainbow city alabama hurst mandamus huntsville alabama mcwilliams v dunn murder unlawful manufacturing pell city alabama mountain brook alabama brady v maryland Shonda Walker, utah v strieff netflix breaking and entering aziz sayyed talladega superspeedway social media SCOTUS, fultondale alabama Thomas Hardiman cherokee county alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon operation bullseye morgan county alabama CCA update US Supreme Court Update smith v state burglary terell corey mcmullin abduction Adamsville alabama capital murder armed robbery lethal injection habeas corpus relief ake v oklahoma drug busts towles v state battles v state betton v state death penalty pinson alabama hurst v florida endangerment of a child implied consent pelham alabama Etowah County Alabama, utah supreme court criminal justice eighth amendment, steve avery public assistance fraud bessemer alabama dothan alabama russell calhoun Guy Terrell Junior Marengo County Alabama car accident alfonso morris mccalla alabama moving violations editorial dora alabama alabama theft of property kimberly alabama Kay Ivey mulga alabama forced isolation operation crackdown foley alabama ring v arizona clarence thomas 28 U.S.C. § 2254 trussville alabama baltimore city circuit court gadsden alabama negligent homicide assault Sardis Alabama brendan dassey robberies nicholas hawkins Wesley Adam Whitworth kidnapping drug possession, bailey v us drug trafficking, kenneth eugene billups sarah koenig court of criminal appeals criminal mischief hall v florida Samuel Alito minor offenses illegal gun carry OJ Simpson Made in America alabama law enforcement agency fort payne alabama decatur alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing adger alabama the mannequin challenge Gardendale Alabama stanley brent chapman banville v state brian fredick lucas theft lauderdale county alabama tuscaloosa alabama npr south carolina eugene lee jones v state fairfield alabama, Tracie Todd john earle redfearn IV v state Joshua Reese apprendi v new jersey judicial override home repair fraud underage drinking warrior alabama limestone county alabama birmingham alabama death penalty, eleventh circuit ruling constitutional law, road rage mobile alabama abandonment Dylann Roof midazolam illegal gambling homicide brookside alabama debtor prison self defense capital offenses prostitution sting jerry bohannon West Alabama fraudulent checks strickland v washington sheffield v state heritage christian university edwards v arizona lamar county Justice Sotomayor calhoun county alabama William Pryor street racing Fentanyl drug activity sexual assault court systems, fourth amendment avondale alabama Alabaster alabama Woods v State eric sterling Mike Hubbard Glaze v State 2016 election, Eutaw Alabama Easter moore v texas court of criminal appeal releases department of justice, huntsville Stephen Breyer warrantless blood draws New York Times arson anniston alabama, state of alabama sixth amendment greene county alabama drug crimes Alonzo Ephraim Hillary Clinton, birchfield v north dakota drug seizure sentencing law and policy blog summaries legende v state adnan syed, bernard v north dakota gun rights crime of passion blountsville alabama Neil Gorsuch homicide rate montgomery alabama state of arizona bomb threat § 13A-3-23 marion county Malone v State felony assaults concealed carry criminal justice reform, embezzlement Briarwood Presbyterian Church Benn v State Tommy Arthur boaz alabama mount olive alabama levins v state heflin alabama hoover alabama making a murderer parole Pleasant Grove Alabama florence alabama nathan woods hanceville alabama drug smuggling madison alabama attempted murder benjamin todd acton texas OJ Simpson department of justice campbell v state christian guitierez springville alabama LWOP pruitt v state church robberies ex parte briseno Walker County Alabama keith v state morris alabama



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.