CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

High Court Reverses Another Alabama Death Sentence

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, June 19, 2017


McWilliams v. Dunn, Comm’r ALDOC

 

Question Presented: Did Alabama courts wrongfully conclude McWilliams was not denied meaningful assistance from a mental-health expert under Ake v. Oklahoma?

 

Facts

 

McWilliams was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death for a 1994 robbery/rape/murder that took place in a convenience store in Tuscaloosa. McWilliams’ mental health was explored in depth during the course of his trial. He was examined by a “Lunacy Commission” composed of three doctors at Taylor Hardin Secure Medical Facility. After he was convicted and after the jury recommended he be sentenced to death by a vote of 10-2, McWilliams asked for neurological and neuropsychological exams. The court order a Dr. John Goff, a neuropsychologist with the State, to examine McWilliams. However, Dr. Goff’s findings were not based on a complete review of his mental health records. His report was given to McWilliams only 48 hours before the judicial sentencing phase. On the eve of the judicial sentencing hearing, Taylor Hardin and Holman Prison sent defense counsel updated records which had been subpoenaed months before. Trial counsel continuously asked the trial court for an independent expert and a continuance, but these requests were rejected.

 

Eventually, McWilliams case arrived in federal court when he filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief. Among other issues, McWilliams argued that the State deprived him of Due Process under Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 (1985). McWilliams argued this denial was a violation of “clearly established federal law” and thus entitled him to habeas corpus relief. The district court denied the request.

 

Ake v. Oklahoma

In Ake, the Court ruled that the Constitution requires the State to provide an indigent defendant with “assistance necessary to prepare an effective defense based on his mental condition” if the defendant’s sanity is in question. The ruling was framed around the concept of the “meaningful access to justice.” The expert should “assist in evaluation, preparation, and presentation of the defense.”

 

Eleventh Circuit Ruling

The Eleventh Circuit denied relief. Initially, the Court concluded that McWilliams failed to meet his burden of showing that “clearly established federal law” entitled him to an independent expert. The Eleventh Circuit noted a split in the circuits regarding whether Ake requires the appointment of an independent expert and that the Supreme Court had never resolved that split. Because the split existed, there was, in the Court’s opinion, no clearly established federal law that could entitled McWilliams relief on this claim. Additionally, the court concluded that the State courts’ determination that Ake had been satisfied was likewise not an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law.

 

Judge Wilson’s dissent

Judge Wilson believed that Ake was not satisfied here. First, the State failed to provide meaningful psychological assistance. McWilliams did not receive any expert assistance until after the sentencing hearing held before the jury. Second, the assistance McWilliams received from Dr. Goff was based on an incomplete review of the mental health records available for consideration. In Judge Wilson’s opinion, this paltry showing did not satisfy Ake and warrants habeas corpus relief.

 

Supreme Court Ruling

The Court ruled that in the particular circumstances of this case, McWilliams’ rights under Ake were not protected. The Court declined to answer the more specific question of whether Ake requires appointment of a mental health expert who is independent of the prosecution because Alabama failed to satisfy “Ake’s most basic requirements.”

 

The Court rejected Alabama’s argument that it complied with Ake by allowing Dr. Goff to examine McWilliams. Ake requires more: “[1] examination and assist in [2] evaluation, [3] preparation, and [4] presentation of the defense.” The Court concluded that even if it were to assume the State satisfied the “examination” requirement, it completely failed to satisfy the last three prongs.

 

While the 11th Circuit had ruled that whatever error McWilliams suffered was “harmless,” the Supreme Court noted that ruling was limited to just the question of whether the requested continuance would have made a difference in McWilliams sentencing. The Court pointed out that on remand the 11th Circuit should consider how the State’s failure to guarantee the remaining three prongs of Ake would have made a difference in McWilliams’ case.

 

Dissent (Alito, Roberts, Thomas, Gorsuch)

The dissent would have had the Court address the narrow question of whether it is clearly established federal law that Ake requires the appointment of an independent mental health expert. The dissent complains that Alabama didn’t have a chance to address the question the Court actually addressed. However, this simply isn’t true. Alabama briefed the merits of the underlying Ake claim at the merits stage.

 

The 11th Circuit on Remand

The Eleventh Circuit is likely to kick the case back down to the district court to address the full Ake question. It’s hard to see McWilliams’ death sentence standing when the Supreme Court has all but said 3 aspects of Ake weren’t satisfied here.

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 


Recent Posts


Tags

department of justice narcotics investigation theft of property utah v strieff texas 28 U.S.C. § 2254 abduction dothan alabama steve avery eighth amendment, netflix ex parte briseno tuscaloosa alabama animal cruelty domestic violence state of arizona hanceville alabama second amendment Samuel Alito dekalb county alabama criminal mischief pinson alabama shoplifting jerry bohannon drug smuggling oneonta alabama south carolina Tommy Arthur minor offenses capital offenses nicholas hawkins drug busts asia mcclain home repair fraud limestone county alabama clarence thomas scotus sheffield v state russell calhoun making a murderer domestic abuse hurst mandamus CCA update talladega superspeedway keith v state blountsville alabama lamar county judicial override moving violations hoax destructive devices npr illegal gambling Justice Sotomayor abuse Hillary Clinton, economic growth pell city alabama springville alabama heflin alabama mountain brook alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church burglary midazolam criminal justice reform, court systems, adnan syed, mccalla alabama Shonda Walker, constitutional violations mobile alabama drug trafficking, mount olive alabama baltimore city circuit court assault greene county alabama strickland v washington warrantless blood draws death penalty, fultondale alabama avondale alabama fraud hurst v florida Sardis Alabama West Alabama levins v state Jefferson County Alabama lauderdale county alabama Lucky D Arcade eric sterling warrior alabama bailey v us 2016 election, underage drinking Fentanyl boaz alabama sentencing law and policy blog summaries rainbow city alabama breaking and entering lethal injection drugs lethal injection sixth amendment Guy Terrell Junior gadsden alabama concealed carry stanley brent chapman drug seizure habeas corpus relief implied consent Etowah County Alabama, dora alabama street racing kimberly alabama drug activity nathan woods Woods v State Thomas Hardiman Gardendale Alabama unlawful manufacturing kenneth eugene billups Adamsville alabama endangerment of a child operation bullseye birmingham alabama court of criminal appeals shelby county Kay Ivey Glaze v State homicide editorial sarah koenig identity theft beylund v north dakota fairfield alabama, hall v florida car accident shooting death fake kidnapping, alabama law enforcement agency moore v texas William Pryor illegal gun carry towles v state homicide rate utah supreme court robberies brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix aiding and abetting madison alabama fourth amendment § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing aziz sayyed Dylann Roof Eutaw Alabama New York Times edwards v arizona mike gilotti § 13A-3-23 montgomery alabama constitutional law, fort payne alabama brian fredick lucas Rule 32 ring v arizona Neil Gorsuch Stephen Breyer christmas shooting Joshua Reese Kareem Dacar Gaymon eugene lee jones v state Pleasant Grove Alabama alfonso morris debit card skimming scams OJ Simpson self defense cherokee county alabama negligent homicide social media albertville alabama SCOTUS, apprendi v new jersey criminal justice church robberies birchfield v north dakota operation crackdown department of justice, florence alabama blount county alabama murder ferguson missouri bomb threat ake v oklahoma felony assaults parole alabama mcwilliams v dunn heritage christian university Malone v State benjamin todd acton Tracie Todd pruitt v state death penalty john earle redfearn IV v state pelham alabama abandonment brady v maryland gun control bessemer alabama shooting huntsville US Supreme Court Update bernard v north dakota anniston alabama, fraudulent checks crime of passion Wesley Adam Whitworth embezzlement battles v state decatur alabama brookside alabama Alabaster alabama hoover alabama Donald Trump, capital murder peyton pruitt calhoun county alabama christian guitierez kidnapping maryland court of special appeals smith v state stoves v state trussville alabama prostitution sting betton v state foley alabama capital punishment mulga alabama huntsville alabama tarrant alabama campbell v state arson Marengo County Alabama alabama supreme court drug crimes debtor prison Ingmire v State Benn v State executions forced isolation Walker County Alabama public assistance fraud state of alabama sexual assault LWOP theft terell corey mcmullin adger alabama legende v state morgan county alabama cullman alabama Xavier Beasley court of criminal appeal releases armed robbery banville v state morris alabama OJ Simpson Made in America drug possession, serial brendan dassey gun rights Alonzo Ephraim attempted murder st clair county alabama alabama criminal law roundup road rage marion county baldwin county alabama the mannequin challenge Easter eleventh circuit ruling Mike Hubbard

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.