CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

High Court Reverses Another Alabama Death Sentence

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, June 19, 2017


McWilliams v. Dunn, Comm’r ALDOC

 

Question Presented: Did Alabama courts wrongfully conclude McWilliams was not denied meaningful assistance from a mental-health expert under Ake v. Oklahoma?

 

Facts

 

McWilliams was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death for a 1994 robbery/rape/murder that took place in a convenience store in Tuscaloosa. McWilliams’ mental health was explored in depth during the course of his trial. He was examined by a “Lunacy Commission” composed of three doctors at Taylor Hardin Secure Medical Facility. After he was convicted and after the jury recommended he be sentenced to death by a vote of 10-2, McWilliams asked for neurological and neuropsychological exams. The court order a Dr. John Goff, a neuropsychologist with the State, to examine McWilliams. However, Dr. Goff’s findings were not based on a complete review of his mental health records. His report was given to McWilliams only 48 hours before the judicial sentencing phase. On the eve of the judicial sentencing hearing, Taylor Hardin and Holman Prison sent defense counsel updated records which had been subpoenaed months before. Trial counsel continuously asked the trial court for an independent expert and a continuance, but these requests were rejected.

 

Eventually, McWilliams case arrived in federal court when he filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief. Among other issues, McWilliams argued that the State deprived him of Due Process under Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 (1985). McWilliams argued this denial was a violation of “clearly established federal law” and thus entitled him to habeas corpus relief. The district court denied the request.

 

Ake v. Oklahoma

In Ake, the Court ruled that the Constitution requires the State to provide an indigent defendant with “assistance necessary to prepare an effective defense based on his mental condition” if the defendant’s sanity is in question. The ruling was framed around the concept of the “meaningful access to justice.” The expert should “assist in evaluation, preparation, and presentation of the defense.”

 

Eleventh Circuit Ruling

The Eleventh Circuit denied relief. Initially, the Court concluded that McWilliams failed to meet his burden of showing that “clearly established federal law” entitled him to an independent expert. The Eleventh Circuit noted a split in the circuits regarding whether Ake requires the appointment of an independent expert and that the Supreme Court had never resolved that split. Because the split existed, there was, in the Court’s opinion, no clearly established federal law that could entitled McWilliams relief on this claim. Additionally, the court concluded that the State courts’ determination that Ake had been satisfied was likewise not an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law.

 

Judge Wilson’s dissent

Judge Wilson believed that Ake was not satisfied here. First, the State failed to provide meaningful psychological assistance. McWilliams did not receive any expert assistance until after the sentencing hearing held before the jury. Second, the assistance McWilliams received from Dr. Goff was based on an incomplete review of the mental health records available for consideration. In Judge Wilson’s opinion, this paltry showing did not satisfy Ake and warrants habeas corpus relief.

 

Supreme Court Ruling

The Court ruled that in the particular circumstances of this case, McWilliams’ rights under Ake were not protected. The Court declined to answer the more specific question of whether Ake requires appointment of a mental health expert who is independent of the prosecution because Alabama failed to satisfy “Ake’s most basic requirements.”

 

The Court rejected Alabama’s argument that it complied with Ake by allowing Dr. Goff to examine McWilliams. Ake requires more: “[1] examination and assist in [2] evaluation, [3] preparation, and [4] presentation of the defense.” The Court concluded that even if it were to assume the State satisfied the “examination” requirement, it completely failed to satisfy the last three prongs.

 

While the 11th Circuit had ruled that whatever error McWilliams suffered was “harmless,” the Supreme Court noted that ruling was limited to just the question of whether the requested continuance would have made a difference in McWilliams sentencing. The Court pointed out that on remand the 11th Circuit should consider how the State’s failure to guarantee the remaining three prongs of Ake would have made a difference in McWilliams’ case.

 

Dissent (Alito, Roberts, Thomas, Gorsuch)

The dissent would have had the Court address the narrow question of whether it is clearly established federal law that Ake requires the appointment of an independent mental health expert. The dissent complains that Alabama didn’t have a chance to address the question the Court actually addressed. However, this simply isn’t true. Alabama briefed the merits of the underlying Ake claim at the merits stage.

 

The 11th Circuit on Remand

The Eleventh Circuit is likely to kick the case back down to the district court to address the full Ake question. It’s hard to see McWilliams’ death sentence standing when the Supreme Court has all but said 3 aspects of Ake weren’t satisfied here.

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 


Recent Posts


Tags

Hillary Clinton, cullman alabama nicholas hawkins banville v state morris alabama narcotics investigation eric sterling pinson alabama kenneth eugene billups the mannequin challenge Justice Sotomayor eleventh circuit ruling Rule 32 trussville alabama theft of property editorial jerry bohannon lamar county hoover alabama department of justice, foley alabama drug crimes implied consent drug seizure smith v state street racing department of justice huntsville LWOP underage drinking hurst v florida lethal injection Easter Tommy Arthur mcwilliams v dunn ake v oklahoma marion county gun control birmingham alabama pell city alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dothan alabama steve avery adnan syed, illegal gambling brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix sexual assault eugene lee jones v state criminal mischief battles v state abduction aziz sayyed constitutional law, blountsville alabama judicial override fraudulent checks court systems, West Alabama Mike Hubbard scotus mccalla alabama capital murder pelham alabama Sardis Alabama gadsden alabama baltimore city circuit court murder forced isolation Dylann Roof hanceville alabama unlawful manufacturing sixth amendment capital offenses hoax destructive devices rainbow city alabama § 13A-3-23 church robberies beylund v north dakota Wesley Adam Whitworth morgan county alabama Guy Terrell Junior Thomas Hardiman assault court of criminal appeals benjamin todd acton dekalb county alabama making a murderer Adamsville alabama sentencing law and policy blog summaries Eutaw Alabama Glaze v State home repair fraud negligent homicide alabama supreme court tuscaloosa alabama dora alabama alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama bailey v us kimberly alabama brendan dassey ex parte briseno aiding and abetting mount olive alabama montgomery alabama npr court of criminal appeal releases hall v florida Kareem Dacar Gaymon concealed carry abandonment Malone v State asia mcclain homicide rate alabama law enforcement agency capital punishment economic growth alabama criminal law roundup minor offenses burglary 2016 election, Marengo County Alabama death penalty maryland court of special appeals Donald Trump, criminal justice edwards v arizona Joshua Reese adger alabama self defense towles v state heritage christian university fort payne alabama domestic abuse homicide Briarwood Presbyterian Church warrantless blood draws cherokee county alabama constitutional violations felony assaults road rage moving violations florence alabama US Supreme Court Update Gardendale Alabama huntsville alabama illegal gun carry armed robbery nathan woods campbell v state mike gilotti albertville alabama brady v maryland William Pryor Jefferson County Alabama drug busts Fentanyl debtor prison blount county alabama animal cruelty arson Alonzo Ephraim stoves v state public assistance fraud springville alabama second amendment § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing st clair county alabama south carolina tarrant alabama utah supreme court christmas shooting utah v strieff midazolam eighth amendment, strickland v washington drug possession, baldwin county alabama heflin alabama hurst mandamus oneonta alabama alfonso morris Shonda Walker, domestic violence moore v texas john earle redfearn IV v state lethal injection drugs shooting death talladega superspeedway birchfield v north dakota peyton pruitt mobile alabama social media fraud OJ Simpson death penalty, anniston alabama, betton v state Lucky D Arcade sarah koenig Alabaster alabama legende v state warrior alabama decatur alabama operation bullseye SCOTUS, shoplifting levins v state stanley brent chapman clarence thomas fourth amendment identity theft Stephen Breyer theft christian guitierez drug activity drug smuggling Woods v State executions breaking and entering serial mulga alabama Neil Gorsuch boaz alabama lauderdale county alabama pruitt v state CCA update Xavier Beasley fake kidnapping, texas car accident OJ Simpson Made in America greene county alabama mountain brook alabama Benn v State apprendi v new jersey gun rights ferguson missouri russell calhoun calhoun county alabama crime of passion kidnapping endangerment of a child debit card skimming scams robberies limestone county alabama keith v state Etowah County Alabama, drug trafficking, brian fredick lucas attempted murder state of arizona terell corey mcmullin netflix Walker County Alabama abuse madison alabama New York Times parole sheffield v state fultondale alabama prostitution sting avondale alabama embezzlement operation crackdown bomb threat shooting bessemer alabama shelby county ring v arizona Ingmire v State criminal justice reform, bernard v north dakota Kay Ivey habeas corpus relief Samuel Alito fairfield alabama, state of alabama brookside alabama Tracie Todd

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.