CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

High Court Reverses Another Alabama Death Sentence

J.D. Lloyd - Monday, June 19, 2017


McWilliams v. Dunn, Comm’r ALDOC

 

Question Presented: Did Alabama courts wrongfully conclude McWilliams was not denied meaningful assistance from a mental-health expert under Ake v. Oklahoma?

 

Facts

 

McWilliams was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death for a 1994 robbery/rape/murder that took place in a convenience store in Tuscaloosa. McWilliams’ mental health was explored in depth during the course of his trial. He was examined by a “Lunacy Commission” composed of three doctors at Taylor Hardin Secure Medical Facility. After he was convicted and after the jury recommended he be sentenced to death by a vote of 10-2, McWilliams asked for neurological and neuropsychological exams. The court order a Dr. John Goff, a neuropsychologist with the State, to examine McWilliams. However, Dr. Goff’s findings were not based on a complete review of his mental health records. His report was given to McWilliams only 48 hours before the judicial sentencing phase. On the eve of the judicial sentencing hearing, Taylor Hardin and Holman Prison sent defense counsel updated records which had been subpoenaed months before. Trial counsel continuously asked the trial court for an independent expert and a continuance, but these requests were rejected.

 

Eventually, McWilliams case arrived in federal court when he filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief. Among other issues, McWilliams argued that the State deprived him of Due Process under Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 (1985). McWilliams argued this denial was a violation of “clearly established federal law” and thus entitled him to habeas corpus relief. The district court denied the request.

 

Ake v. Oklahoma

In Ake, the Court ruled that the Constitution requires the State to provide an indigent defendant with “assistance necessary to prepare an effective defense based on his mental condition” if the defendant’s sanity is in question. The ruling was framed around the concept of the “meaningful access to justice.” The expert should “assist in evaluation, preparation, and presentation of the defense.”

 

Eleventh Circuit Ruling

The Eleventh Circuit denied relief. Initially, the Court concluded that McWilliams failed to meet his burden of showing that “clearly established federal law” entitled him to an independent expert. The Eleventh Circuit noted a split in the circuits regarding whether Ake requires the appointment of an independent expert and that the Supreme Court had never resolved that split. Because the split existed, there was, in the Court’s opinion, no clearly established federal law that could entitled McWilliams relief on this claim. Additionally, the court concluded that the State courts’ determination that Ake had been satisfied was likewise not an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law.

 

Judge Wilson’s dissent

Judge Wilson believed that Ake was not satisfied here. First, the State failed to provide meaningful psychological assistance. McWilliams did not receive any expert assistance until after the sentencing hearing held before the jury. Second, the assistance McWilliams received from Dr. Goff was based on an incomplete review of the mental health records available for consideration. In Judge Wilson’s opinion, this paltry showing did not satisfy Ake and warrants habeas corpus relief.

 

Supreme Court Ruling

The Court ruled that in the particular circumstances of this case, McWilliams’ rights under Ake were not protected. The Court declined to answer the more specific question of whether Ake requires appointment of a mental health expert who is independent of the prosecution because Alabama failed to satisfy “Ake’s most basic requirements.”

 

The Court rejected Alabama’s argument that it complied with Ake by allowing Dr. Goff to examine McWilliams. Ake requires more: “[1] examination and assist in [2] evaluation, [3] preparation, and [4] presentation of the defense.” The Court concluded that even if it were to assume the State satisfied the “examination” requirement, it completely failed to satisfy the last three prongs.

 

While the 11th Circuit had ruled that whatever error McWilliams suffered was “harmless,” the Supreme Court noted that ruling was limited to just the question of whether the requested continuance would have made a difference in McWilliams sentencing. The Court pointed out that on remand the 11th Circuit should consider how the State’s failure to guarantee the remaining three prongs of Ake would have made a difference in McWilliams’ case.

 

Dissent (Alito, Roberts, Thomas, Gorsuch)

The dissent would have had the Court address the narrow question of whether it is clearly established federal law that Ake requires the appointment of an independent mental health expert. The dissent complains that Alabama didn’t have a chance to address the question the Court actually addressed. However, this simply isn’t true. Alabama briefed the merits of the underlying Ake claim at the merits stage.

 

The 11th Circuit on Remand

The Eleventh Circuit is likely to kick the case back down to the district court to address the full Ake question. It’s hard to see McWilliams’ death sentence standing when the Supreme Court has all but said 3 aspects of Ake weren’t satisfied here.

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 


Recent Posts


Tags

homicide homicide rate limestone county alabama warrantless blood draws habeas corpus relief alabama campbell v state Rule 32 Tommy Arthur § 13A-3-23 Briarwood Presbyterian Church scotus Etowah County Alabama, kimberly alabama stoves v state debtor prison kidnapping blountsville alabama mountain brook alabama burglary drug busts identity theft Kay Ivey forced isolation steve avery Neil Gorsuch stanley brent chapman hoover alabama peyton pruitt prostitution sting brady v maryland criminal justice reform, adger alabama illegal gun carry West Alabama OJ Simpson Made in America albertville alabama 2016 election, brian fredick lucas operation crackdown Kareem Dacar Gaymon shelby county judicial override fairfield alabama, drug smuggling CCA update public assistance fraud theft of property economic growth Dylann Roof brookside alabama Mike Hubbard Eutaw Alabama executions battles v state nicholas hawkins mcwilliams v dunn Jefferson County Alabama sexual assault mccalla alabama felony assaults abuse talladega superspeedway lethal injection edwards v arizona christmas shooting embezzlement assault eugene lee jones v state keith v state mulga alabama utah supreme court Gardendale Alabama ferguson missouri mike gilotti shooting death foley alabama court of criminal appeals road rage terell corey mcmullin rainbow city alabama ex parte briseno fake kidnapping, bessemer alabama birmingham alabama Guy Terrell Junior domestic abuse morris alabama department of justice, morgan county alabama abandonment Wesley Adam Whitworth Fentanyl drug crimes Hillary Clinton, dekalb county alabama car accident armed robbery making a murderer banville v state Glaze v State fourth amendment Joshua Reese texas dora alabama William Pryor street racing levins v state jerry bohannon maryland court of special appeals Samuel Alito lauderdale county alabama legende v state anniston alabama, warrior alabama Easter bomb threat calhoun county alabama constitutional violations capital murder lethal injection drugs Justice Sotomayor birchfield v north dakota attempted murder russell calhoun narcotics investigation self defense hurst v florida huntsville alabama utah v strieff criminal mischief LWOP pinson alabama constitutional law, death penalty aiding and abetting pruitt v state eleventh circuit ruling pell city alabama moore v texas gadsden alabama brendan dassey minor offenses netflix sheffield v state springville alabama bailey v us operation bullseye gun rights tuscaloosa alabama drug seizure eighth amendment, crime of passion oneonta alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix capital offenses huntsville boaz alabama state of alabama mobile alabama fraudulent checks Ingmire v State Lucky D Arcade Shonda Walker, underage drinking SCOTUS, aziz sayyed department of justice lamar county murder alfonso morris betton v state criminal justice montgomery alabama death penalty, towles v state state of arizona fort payne alabama mount olive alabama alabama criminal law roundup Donald Trump, dothan alabama bernard v north dakota church robberies hanceville alabama Adamsville alabama st clair county alabama second amendment Sardis Alabama implied consent hurst mandamus shooting parole hoax destructive devices hall v florida Marengo County Alabama arson Pleasant Grove Alabama Woods v State animal cruelty the mannequin challenge sixth amendment tarrant alabama Tracie Todd moving violations capital punishment sarah koenig Benn v State pelham alabama home repair fraud eric sterling apprendi v new jersey baltimore city circuit court court of criminal appeal releases npr nathan woods decatur alabama breaking and entering fraud drug possession, Malone v State strickland v washington madison alabama OJ Simpson Stephen Breyer beylund v north dakota alabama law enforcement agency drug activity benjamin todd acton § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing social media ring v arizona serial john earle redfearn IV v state florence alabama negligent homicide gun control New York Times trussville alabama midazolam clarence thomas illegal gambling alabama supreme court abduction debit card skimming scams adnan syed, greene county alabama shoplifting heflin alabama US Supreme Court Update endangerment of a child drug trafficking, Xavier Beasley asia mcclain 28 U.S.C. § 2254 sentencing law and policy blog summaries christian guitierez south carolina robberies ake v oklahoma kenneth eugene billups Walker County Alabama editorial theft baldwin county alabama marion county cullman alabama concealed carry fultondale alabama Thomas Hardiman blount county alabama avondale alabama court systems, Alonzo Ephraim heritage christian university unlawful manufacturing Alabaster alabama domestic violence smith v state cherokee county alabama

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.