CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.


J.D. Lloyd - Friday, May 06, 2016

Eugene Lee Jones v. State (CR-14-1332)


Jones was convicted of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder, stemming from him killing a woman he suspected of setting him up in a robbery. Jones voluntarily talked to investigators on July 29, 2013, in connection to the death, but eventually stopped the questioning when he invoked his right to counsel. Jones was arrested on an outstanding warrant out of Bessemer. Jones was eventually transported back to Lauderdale County on another warrant stemming from a charge unrelated to the homicide. While still in custody, Jones was asked to submit to a polygraph examination. Jones waived his Miranda rights, submitted to the polygraph, and subsequently made another statement in which he admitted that he strangled the victim. Jones moved to suppress this statement under Edwards v. AZ, 451 US 477 (1981) on the grounds that investigators improperly re-initiated contact after he had invoked his right to counsel. The circuit court denied the motion. AFFIRMED. Relying on MD v. Shatzer, 559 US 98 (2010), the CCA affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress on the grounds that “coercive effect” of re-initiation of interrogation wasn’t present in this case like it was in Edwards. Essentially, the Court held that if enough time has passed since the initial invocation of the right to counsel -- more than 14 days -- there is no presumptively problematic re-initiation as there was in Edwards.


Levins v. State (CR-15-0612)


Bell v. State (CR-15-0618)

The appellants in these two cases were two expungement petitioners who were denied relief at the circuit court level and asked the CCA to reverse the denials of their petitions. APPEALS DISMISSED One may only challenge the denial of their expungement petition by petitioning the Alabama Supreme Court for certiorari review of the denial of the petition for expungement.

John Earle Redfearn, IV v. State (CR-14-0500)


This case involved the denial of a motion to suppress drugs evidence recovered from Redfearn’s body. In February 2012, law enforcement obtained a search warrant of Redfearn’s residence based upon 2 controlled buys that occurred at the residence with Redfearn. Law enforcement executed the SW after they observed Redfearn drive away from the house. He was stopped several miles away while the search of the house was going on and taken back to the house by the detaining officers. While executing the warrant, Redfearn’s girlfriend arrived at the house and eventually told the officers that Redfearn keeps drugs on his person. An officer strip-searched Redfearn at the residence and recovered a bottle containing oxycodone pills in his underwear. Redfearn moved to suppress under Bailey v. US, 133 S.Ct. 1031 (2013). AFFIRMED. The CCA explained that while Bailey held that a suspect may be lawfully detained while police are conducting a search warrant only when the person is in the "immediate vicinity" of the place to be searched, Redfearn was properly detained because the police had probable cause to arrest him based upon the controlled buys previously carried out with Redfearn and observed by law enforcement.


Nathaniel Woods (CR-10-0695)

Alfonso Morris (CR-11-1925)

John Russell Calhoun (CR-14-0779)

In these three cases, the CCA affirmed the denial of Rule 32 relief for death-row inmates without holding evidentiary hearings. There’s not much that’s noteworthy in these opinions outside of the observation that the petitions were summarily denied because each petitioner failed to plead sufficient facts that, if proven true, could entitle them to relief. The vast majority of the factual claims in the three petitions were bare-boned factual allegations. In Woods and Morris, petitioners raised claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present certain expert testimony at trial. The CCA affirmed the summary dismissal of these claims because the petitioner failed to identify an expert and what that expert’s testimony would have been at the pleading stage. It bears repeating that if you’re going to raise an IAC claim, in order to be entitled to a hearing, you have to give the circuit court sufficient factual allegations that the court can conclude that your claims could entitle you to relief if proven true. In the context of IAC based on the failure to call certain expert witnesses, you need to make a proffer as to who that expert would have been and what the testimony would have been at the pleading stage.


Brian Fredick Lucas (CR-14-0744)


Lucas was convicted of first-degree attempted sodomy by forcible compulsion and first-degree sexual abuse stemming from an incident in which he allegedly touched his step-daughter on the mouth with his penis while she was sleeping. The CCA reversed his first-degree sodomy conviction on the grounds that the State’s showing did not present evidence of forcible compulsion -- there was no threat by Lucas or evidence that his actions overcame her earnest resistance. The CCA did enter a judgment convicting Lucas of attempted sexual misconduct.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


alabama LWOP Tommy Arthur Malone v State adnan syed, warrantless blood draws Walker County Alabama West Alabama Lucky D Arcade abduction morgan county alabama sexual assault domestic violence baldwin county alabama second amendment illegal gun carry concealed carry mobile alabama Mike Hubbard shooting death shooting forced isolation SCOTUS, William Pryor capital punishment Kareem Dacar Gaymon lamar county avondale alabama foley alabama habeas corpus relief economic growth debtor prison serial greene county alabama birmingham alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing calhoun county alabama warrior alabama armed robbery OJ Simpson brookside alabama Hillary Clinton, pinson alabama fake kidnapping, brian fredick lucas sheffield v state Briarwood Presbyterian Church christmas shooting cherokee county alabama madison alabama florence alabama edwards v arizona drug trafficking, homicide rate Fentanyl Easter jerry bohannon implied consent tarrant alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix montgomery alabama blount county alabama negligent homicide Alabaster alabama operation bullseye john earle redfearn IV v state operation crackdown death penalty eleventh circuit ruling assault ferguson missouri street racing eugene lee jones v state hall v florida arson illegal gambling utah v strieff Xavier Beasley constitutional violations Guy Terrell Junior gun control springville alabama russell calhoun ex parte briseno editorial home repair fraud brady v maryland embezzlement Joshua Reese homicide death penalty, lethal injection drugs peyton pruitt benjamin todd acton Kay Ivey making a murderer Samuel Alito unlawful manufacturing apprendi v new jersey gadsden alabama alabama supreme court baltimore city circuit court Rule 32 heflin alabama steve avery crime of passion netflix department of justice, fort payne alabama mount olive alabama fraudulent checks underage drinking narcotics investigation dora alabama state of arizona utah supreme court npr Stephen Breyer Wesley Adam Whitworth marion county pruitt v state Shonda Walker, CCA update Adamsville alabama sixth amendment fourth amendment executions court of criminal appeals church robberies criminal justice court of criminal appeal releases hoax destructive devices Thomas Hardiman battles v state hurst v florida keith v state campbell v state Jefferson County Alabama lethal injection nathan woods alfonso morris legende v state § 13A-3-23 christian guitierez self defense alabama criminal law roundup Etowah County Alabama, burglary gun rights rainbow city alabama boaz alabama social media murder Pleasant Grove Alabama brendan dassey Neil Gorsuch Marengo County Alabama identity theft scotus Justice Sotomayor dothan alabama drug busts New York Times moore v texas adger alabama Alonzo Ephraim fraud shoplifting pell city alabama public assistance fraud capital offenses felony assaults Sardis Alabama prostitution sting banville v state minor offenses car accident talladega superspeedway albertville alabama bernard v north dakota mccalla alabama abandonment aziz sayyed heritage christian university stanley brent chapman stoves v state aiding and abetting kenneth eugene billups the mannequin challenge state of alabama kimberly alabama lauderdale county alabama abuse maryland court of special appeals fairfield alabama, huntsville alabama decatur alabama betton v state beylund v north dakota texas Woods v State strickland v washington capital murder OJ Simpson Made in America Ingmire v State drug smuggling sarah koenig eighth amendment, criminal mischief ring v arizona theft of property hanceville alabama constitutional law, US Supreme Court Update cullman alabama mulga alabama towles v state hoover alabama mountain brook alabama breaking and entering criminal justice reform, kidnapping midazolam morris alabama huntsville department of justice south carolina theft domestic abuse sentencing law and policy blog summaries nicholas hawkins Gardendale Alabama levins v state st clair county alabama Glaze v State ake v oklahoma dekalb county alabama Donald Trump, bomb threat mcwilliams v dunn drug seizure mike gilotti tuscaloosa alabama drug crimes moving violations terell corey mcmullin oneonta alabama anniston alabama, drug possession, drug activity limestone county alabama blountsville alabama court systems, shelby county judicial override Eutaw Alabama Tracie Todd eric sterling smith v state fultondale alabama pelham alabama trussville alabama debit card skimming scams attempted murder Dylann Roof Benn v State clarence thomas road rage hurst mandamus birchfield v north dakota robberies alabama law enforcement agency parole 28 U.S.C. § 2254 asia mcclain bailey v us 2016 election, bessemer alabama animal cruelty endangerment of a child



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.