CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.


J.D. Lloyd - Friday, May 06, 2016

Eugene Lee Jones v. State (CR-14-1332)


Jones was convicted of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder, stemming from him killing a woman he suspected of setting him up in a robbery. Jones voluntarily talked to investigators on July 29, 2013, in connection to the death, but eventually stopped the questioning when he invoked his right to counsel. Jones was arrested on an outstanding warrant out of Bessemer. Jones was eventually transported back to Lauderdale County on another warrant stemming from a charge unrelated to the homicide. While still in custody, Jones was asked to submit to a polygraph examination. Jones waived his Miranda rights, submitted to the polygraph, and subsequently made another statement in which he admitted that he strangled the victim. Jones moved to suppress this statement under Edwards v. AZ, 451 US 477 (1981) on the grounds that investigators improperly re-initiated contact after he had invoked his right to counsel. The circuit court denied the motion. AFFIRMED. Relying on MD v. Shatzer, 559 US 98 (2010), the CCA affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress on the grounds that “coercive effect” of re-initiation of interrogation wasn’t present in this case like it was in Edwards. Essentially, the Court held that if enough time has passed since the initial invocation of the right to counsel -- more than 14 days -- there is no presumptively problematic re-initiation as there was in Edwards.


Levins v. State (CR-15-0612)


Bell v. State (CR-15-0618)

The appellants in these two cases were two expungement petitioners who were denied relief at the circuit court level and asked the CCA to reverse the denials of their petitions. APPEALS DISMISSED One may only challenge the denial of their expungement petition by petitioning the Alabama Supreme Court for certiorari review of the denial of the petition for expungement.

John Earle Redfearn, IV v. State (CR-14-0500)


This case involved the denial of a motion to suppress drugs evidence recovered from Redfearn’s body. In February 2012, law enforcement obtained a search warrant of Redfearn’s residence based upon 2 controlled buys that occurred at the residence with Redfearn. Law enforcement executed the SW after they observed Redfearn drive away from the house. He was stopped several miles away while the search of the house was going on and taken back to the house by the detaining officers. While executing the warrant, Redfearn’s girlfriend arrived at the house and eventually told the officers that Redfearn keeps drugs on his person. An officer strip-searched Redfearn at the residence and recovered a bottle containing oxycodone pills in his underwear. Redfearn moved to suppress under Bailey v. US, 133 S.Ct. 1031 (2013). AFFIRMED. The CCA explained that while Bailey held that a suspect may be lawfully detained while police are conducting a search warrant only when the person is in the "immediate vicinity" of the place to be searched, Redfearn was properly detained because the police had probable cause to arrest him based upon the controlled buys previously carried out with Redfearn and observed by law enforcement.


Nathaniel Woods (CR-10-0695)

Alfonso Morris (CR-11-1925)

John Russell Calhoun (CR-14-0779)

In these three cases, the CCA affirmed the denial of Rule 32 relief for death-row inmates without holding evidentiary hearings. There’s not much that’s noteworthy in these opinions outside of the observation that the petitions were summarily denied because each petitioner failed to plead sufficient facts that, if proven true, could entitle them to relief. The vast majority of the factual claims in the three petitions were bare-boned factual allegations. In Woods and Morris, petitioners raised claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present certain expert testimony at trial. The CCA affirmed the summary dismissal of these claims because the petitioner failed to identify an expert and what that expert’s testimony would have been at the pleading stage. It bears repeating that if you’re going to raise an IAC claim, in order to be entitled to a hearing, you have to give the circuit court sufficient factual allegations that the court can conclude that your claims could entitle you to relief if proven true. In the context of IAC based on the failure to call certain expert witnesses, you need to make a proffer as to who that expert would have been and what the testimony would have been at the pleading stage.


Brian Fredick Lucas (CR-14-0744)


Lucas was convicted of first-degree attempted sodomy by forcible compulsion and first-degree sexual abuse stemming from an incident in which he allegedly touched his step-daughter on the mouth with his penis while she was sleeping. The CCA reversed his first-degree sodomy conviction on the grounds that the State’s showing did not present evidence of forcible compulsion -- there was no threat by Lucas or evidence that his actions overcame her earnest resistance. The CCA did enter a judgment convicting Lucas of attempted sexual misconduct.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


alabama baltimore city circuit court birchfield v north dakota mike gilotti alabama law enforcement agency netflix pinson alabama abuse criminal justice debit card skimming scams sentencing law and policy blog summaries negligent homicide Alonzo Ephraim mountain brook alabama illegal gambling strickland v washington capital punishment New York Times lauderdale county alabama Kay Ivey breaking and entering scotus drug possession, Wesley Adam Whitworth attempted murder church robberies underage drinking second amendment montgomery alabama fultondale alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church theft of property concealed carry brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix campbell v state alabama criminal law roundup lamar county hoover alabama heritage christian university blountsville alabama crime of passion 28 U.S.C. § 2254 § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing adger alabama gun control parole tuscaloosa alabama SCOTUS, sarah koenig mobile alabama Hillary Clinton, department of justice criminal justice reform, prostitution sting eric sterling Benn v State capital offenses department of justice, social media shoplifting criminal mischief mccalla alabama gun rights making a murderer legende v state abandonment benjamin todd acton drug activity stoves v state Sardis Alabama Fentanyl death penalty hurst mandamus morgan county alabama ex parte briseno fraudulent checks state of alabama dekalb county alabama ferguson missouri oneonta alabama south carolina Shonda Walker, mulga alabama fake kidnapping, Tracie Todd bailey v us shelby county birmingham alabama unlawful manufacturing asia mcclain executions hoax destructive devices mcwilliams v dunn npr lethal injection tarrant alabama brookside alabama drug busts Tommy Arthur hurst v florida mount olive alabama utah v strieff greene county alabama felony assaults marion county cherokee county alabama battles v state domestic violence gadsden alabama illegal gun carry bomb threat operation crackdown identity theft huntsville Gardendale Alabama eugene lee jones v state embezzlement albertville alabama Lucky D Arcade fourth amendment drug trafficking, huntsville alabama homicide rate Samuel Alito drug seizure constitutional violations fairfield alabama, LWOP russell calhoun rainbow city alabama court of criminal appeals self defense florence alabama blount county alabama dora alabama steve avery smith v state apprendi v new jersey Malone v State OJ Simpson Made in America state of arizona Guy Terrell Junior baldwin county alabama pelham alabama drug crimes Justice Sotomayor § 13A-3-23 debtor prison Adamsville alabama Ingmire v State sexual assault car accident economic growth stanley brent chapman jerry bohannon Marengo County Alabama Eutaw Alabama Donald Trump, public assistance fraud Jefferson County Alabama christian guitierez lethal injection drugs domestic abuse avondale alabama judicial override OJ Simpson warrior alabama fort payne alabama fraud minor offenses moving violations Pleasant Grove Alabama eighth amendment, animal cruelty alfonso morris assault William Pryor christmas shooting brian fredick lucas death penalty, cullman alabama pruitt v state towles v state Xavier Beasley robberies ring v arizona armed robbery madison alabama aziz sayyed constitutional law, court systems, Thomas Hardiman abduction dothan alabama Glaze v State ake v oklahoma kimberly alabama eleventh circuit ruling home repair fraud homicide brendan dassey trussville alabama clarence thomas hall v florida Easter sixth amendment aiding and abetting limestone county alabama utah supreme court 2016 election, the mannequin challenge beylund v north dakota midazolam boaz alabama Etowah County Alabama, talladega superspeedway sheffield v state moore v texas Neil Gorsuch Woods v State street racing adnan syed, alabama supreme court banville v state forced isolation bessemer alabama springville alabama Mike Hubbard terell corey mcmullin narcotics investigation bernard v north dakota levins v state serial heflin alabama Dylann Roof brady v maryland foley alabama burglary theft edwards v arizona Alabaster alabama peyton pruitt Stephen Breyer shooting pell city alabama nicholas hawkins warrantless blood draws endangerment of a child john earle redfearn IV v state operation bullseye kidnapping texas US Supreme Court Update arson drug smuggling West Alabama CCA update capital murder shooting death murder road rage editorial decatur alabama st clair county alabama court of criminal appeal releases Rule 32 keith v state nathan woods anniston alabama, habeas corpus relief maryland court of special appeals implied consent hanceville alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon calhoun county alabama Joshua Reese kenneth eugene billups Walker County Alabama morris alabama betton v state



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.