CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.


J.D. Lloyd - Friday, May 06, 2016

Eugene Lee Jones v. State (CR-14-1332)


Jones was convicted of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder, stemming from him killing a woman he suspected of setting him up in a robbery. Jones voluntarily talked to investigators on July 29, 2013, in connection to the death, but eventually stopped the questioning when he invoked his right to counsel. Jones was arrested on an outstanding warrant out of Bessemer. Jones was eventually transported back to Lauderdale County on another warrant stemming from a charge unrelated to the homicide. While still in custody, Jones was asked to submit to a polygraph examination. Jones waived his Miranda rights, submitted to the polygraph, and subsequently made another statement in which he admitted that he strangled the victim. Jones moved to suppress this statement under Edwards v. AZ, 451 US 477 (1981) on the grounds that investigators improperly re-initiated contact after he had invoked his right to counsel. The circuit court denied the motion. AFFIRMED. Relying on MD v. Shatzer, 559 US 98 (2010), the CCA affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress on the grounds that “coercive effect” of re-initiation of interrogation wasn’t present in this case like it was in Edwards. Essentially, the Court held that if enough time has passed since the initial invocation of the right to counsel -- more than 14 days -- there is no presumptively problematic re-initiation as there was in Edwards.


Levins v. State (CR-15-0612)


Bell v. State (CR-15-0618)

The appellants in these two cases were two expungement petitioners who were denied relief at the circuit court level and asked the CCA to reverse the denials of their petitions. APPEALS DISMISSED One may only challenge the denial of their expungement petition by petitioning the Alabama Supreme Court for certiorari review of the denial of the petition for expungement.

John Earle Redfearn, IV v. State (CR-14-0500)


This case involved the denial of a motion to suppress drugs evidence recovered from Redfearn’s body. In February 2012, law enforcement obtained a search warrant of Redfearn’s residence based upon 2 controlled buys that occurred at the residence with Redfearn. Law enforcement executed the SW after they observed Redfearn drive away from the house. He was stopped several miles away while the search of the house was going on and taken back to the house by the detaining officers. While executing the warrant, Redfearn’s girlfriend arrived at the house and eventually told the officers that Redfearn keeps drugs on his person. An officer strip-searched Redfearn at the residence and recovered a bottle containing oxycodone pills in his underwear. Redfearn moved to suppress under Bailey v. US, 133 S.Ct. 1031 (2013). AFFIRMED. The CCA explained that while Bailey held that a suspect may be lawfully detained while police are conducting a search warrant only when the person is in the "immediate vicinity" of the place to be searched, Redfearn was properly detained because the police had probable cause to arrest him based upon the controlled buys previously carried out with Redfearn and observed by law enforcement.


Nathaniel Woods (CR-10-0695)

Alfonso Morris (CR-11-1925)

John Russell Calhoun (CR-14-0779)

In these three cases, the CCA affirmed the denial of Rule 32 relief for death-row inmates without holding evidentiary hearings. There’s not much that’s noteworthy in these opinions outside of the observation that the petitions were summarily denied because each petitioner failed to plead sufficient facts that, if proven true, could entitle them to relief. The vast majority of the factual claims in the three petitions were bare-boned factual allegations. In Woods and Morris, petitioners raised claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present certain expert testimony at trial. The CCA affirmed the summary dismissal of these claims because the petitioner failed to identify an expert and what that expert’s testimony would have been at the pleading stage. It bears repeating that if you’re going to raise an IAC claim, in order to be entitled to a hearing, you have to give the circuit court sufficient factual allegations that the court can conclude that your claims could entitle you to relief if proven true. In the context of IAC based on the failure to call certain expert witnesses, you need to make a proffer as to who that expert would have been and what the testimony would have been at the pleading stage.


Brian Fredick Lucas (CR-14-0744)


Lucas was convicted of first-degree attempted sodomy by forcible compulsion and first-degree sexual abuse stemming from an incident in which he allegedly touched his step-daughter on the mouth with his penis while she was sleeping. The CCA reversed his first-degree sodomy conviction on the grounds that the State’s showing did not present evidence of forcible compulsion -- there was no threat by Lucas or evidence that his actions overcame her earnest resistance. The CCA did enter a judgment convicting Lucas of attempted sexual misconduct.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


aziz sayyed Rule 32 albertville alabama theft death penalty, debtor prison hanceville alabama huntsville alabama pinson alabama levins v state Shonda Walker, home repair fraud nicholas hawkins concealed carry habeas corpus relief criminal justice serial brady v maryland underage drinking Ingmire v State apprendi v new jersey mccalla alabama US Supreme Court Update felony assaults William Pryor Walker County Alabama Neil Gorsuch shooting death jerry bohannon christmas shooting abandonment social media steve avery Tommy Arthur keith v state campbell v state Kay Ivey Briarwood Presbyterian Church alfonso morris robberies department of justice Malone v State edwards v arizona alabama law enforcement agency endangerment of a child moore v texas § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing Samuel Alito montgomery alabama fake kidnapping, stanley brent chapman tarrant alabama boaz alabama fraudulent checks Hillary Clinton, warrantless blood draws Etowah County Alabama, second amendment warrior alabama ring v arizona breaking and entering st clair county alabama sexual assault stoves v state pruitt v state Eutaw Alabama adger alabama eugene lee jones v state bernard v north dakota madison alabama brookside alabama morris alabama the mannequin challenge animal cruelty bomb threat adnan syed, blount county alabama utah supreme court armed robbery foley alabama fultondale alabama Mike Hubbard terell corey mcmullin mcwilliams v dunn mulga alabama anniston alabama, pell city alabama Joshua Reese court of criminal appeal releases lamar county marion county aiding and abetting SCOTUS, constitutional law, Donald Trump, clarence thomas south carolina lethal injection drugs bessemer alabama beylund v north dakota abuse state of alabama making a murderer editorial capital murder towles v state sentencing law and policy blog summaries murder florence alabama constitutional violations cherokee county alabama Fentanyl New York Times alabama criminal law roundup shoplifting mobile alabama criminal mischief sarah koenig drug smuggling hoax destructive devices death penalty negligent homicide OJ Simpson debit card skimming scams moving violations limestone county alabama drug activity Woods v State birmingham alabama battles v state cullman alabama drug busts morgan county alabama forced isolation Jefferson County Alabama Justice Sotomayor capital offenses hall v florida hurst v florida Tracie Todd embezzlement huntsville dekalb county alabama alabama baldwin county alabama npr hurst mandamus asia mcclain netflix domestic abuse shelby county betton v state brendan dassey bailey v us theft of property Glaze v State economic growth midazolam drug trafficking, gun control gun rights narcotics investigation Alabaster alabama criminal justice reform, Thomas Hardiman kidnapping kimberly alabama minor offenses operation crackdown street racing Alonzo Ephraim mountain brook alabama drug crimes illegal gambling oneonta alabama Benn v State West Alabama § 13A-3-23 arson 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ferguson missouri dora alabama avondale alabama greene county alabama decatur alabama mike gilotti parole drug possession, state of arizona Wesley Adam Whitworth road rage Lucky D Arcade heritage christian university shooting blountsville alabama public assistance fraud homicide rate peyton pruitt Sardis Alabama OJ Simpson Made in America talladega superspeedway banville v state christian guitierez texas Kareem Dacar Gaymon homicide car accident heflin alabama calhoun county alabama LWOP legende v state executions department of justice, brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix lethal injection judicial override court of criminal appeals hoover alabama pelham alabama Stephen Breyer strickland v washington eighth amendment, birchfield v north dakota brian fredick lucas alabama supreme court Guy Terrell Junior implied consent Marengo County Alabama sheffield v state fraud mount olive alabama rainbow city alabama ex parte briseno sixth amendment john earle redfearn IV v state tuscaloosa alabama smith v state crime of passion unlawful manufacturing fairfield alabama, kenneth eugene billups Gardendale Alabama Adamsville alabama fort payne alabama operation bullseye eric sterling self defense capital punishment Xavier Beasley identity theft drug seizure abduction dothan alabama church robberies 2016 election, gadsden alabama prostitution sting illegal gun carry burglary eleventh circuit ruling nathan woods court systems, benjamin todd acton assault attempted murder russell calhoun Pleasant Grove Alabama maryland court of special appeals CCA update Dylann Roof lauderdale county alabama scotus fourth amendment trussville alabama baltimore city circuit court domestic violence utah v strieff Easter springville alabama ake v oklahoma



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.