CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.


J.D. Lloyd - Friday, May 06, 2016

Eugene Lee Jones v. State (CR-14-1332)


Jones was convicted of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder, stemming from him killing a woman he suspected of setting him up in a robbery. Jones voluntarily talked to investigators on July 29, 2013, in connection to the death, but eventually stopped the questioning when he invoked his right to counsel. Jones was arrested on an outstanding warrant out of Bessemer. Jones was eventually transported back to Lauderdale County on another warrant stemming from a charge unrelated to the homicide. While still in custody, Jones was asked to submit to a polygraph examination. Jones waived his Miranda rights, submitted to the polygraph, and subsequently made another statement in which he admitted that he strangled the victim. Jones moved to suppress this statement under Edwards v. AZ, 451 US 477 (1981) on the grounds that investigators improperly re-initiated contact after he had invoked his right to counsel. The circuit court denied the motion. AFFIRMED. Relying on MD v. Shatzer, 559 US 98 (2010), the CCA affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress on the grounds that “coercive effect” of re-initiation of interrogation wasn’t present in this case like it was in Edwards. Essentially, the Court held that if enough time has passed since the initial invocation of the right to counsel -- more than 14 days -- there is no presumptively problematic re-initiation as there was in Edwards.


Levins v. State (CR-15-0612)


Bell v. State (CR-15-0618)

The appellants in these two cases were two expungement petitioners who were denied relief at the circuit court level and asked the CCA to reverse the denials of their petitions. APPEALS DISMISSED One may only challenge the denial of their expungement petition by petitioning the Alabama Supreme Court for certiorari review of the denial of the petition for expungement.

John Earle Redfearn, IV v. State (CR-14-0500)


This case involved the denial of a motion to suppress drugs evidence recovered from Redfearn’s body. In February 2012, law enforcement obtained a search warrant of Redfearn’s residence based upon 2 controlled buys that occurred at the residence with Redfearn. Law enforcement executed the SW after they observed Redfearn drive away from the house. He was stopped several miles away while the search of the house was going on and taken back to the house by the detaining officers. While executing the warrant, Redfearn’s girlfriend arrived at the house and eventually told the officers that Redfearn keeps drugs on his person. An officer strip-searched Redfearn at the residence and recovered a bottle containing oxycodone pills in his underwear. Redfearn moved to suppress under Bailey v. US, 133 S.Ct. 1031 (2013). AFFIRMED. The CCA explained that while Bailey held that a suspect may be lawfully detained while police are conducting a search warrant only when the person is in the "immediate vicinity" of the place to be searched, Redfearn was properly detained because the police had probable cause to arrest him based upon the controlled buys previously carried out with Redfearn and observed by law enforcement.


Nathaniel Woods (CR-10-0695)

Alfonso Morris (CR-11-1925)

John Russell Calhoun (CR-14-0779)

In these three cases, the CCA affirmed the denial of Rule 32 relief for death-row inmates without holding evidentiary hearings. There’s not much that’s noteworthy in these opinions outside of the observation that the petitions were summarily denied because each petitioner failed to plead sufficient facts that, if proven true, could entitle them to relief. The vast majority of the factual claims in the three petitions were bare-boned factual allegations. In Woods and Morris, petitioners raised claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present certain expert testimony at trial. The CCA affirmed the summary dismissal of these claims because the petitioner failed to identify an expert and what that expert’s testimony would have been at the pleading stage. It bears repeating that if you’re going to raise an IAC claim, in order to be entitled to a hearing, you have to give the circuit court sufficient factual allegations that the court can conclude that your claims could entitle you to relief if proven true. In the context of IAC based on the failure to call certain expert witnesses, you need to make a proffer as to who that expert would have been and what the testimony would have been at the pleading stage.


Brian Fredick Lucas (CR-14-0744)


Lucas was convicted of first-degree attempted sodomy by forcible compulsion and first-degree sexual abuse stemming from an incident in which he allegedly touched his step-daughter on the mouth with his penis while she was sleeping. The CCA reversed his first-degree sodomy conviction on the grounds that the State’s showing did not present evidence of forcible compulsion -- there was no threat by Lucas or evidence that his actions overcame her earnest resistance. The CCA did enter a judgment convicting Lucas of attempted sexual misconduct.



If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


Recent Posts


kenneth eugene billups fairfield alabama, eugene lee jones v state sixth amendment betton v state editorial Gardendale Alabama edwards v arizona felony assaults utah v strieff death penalty, Kay Ivey Justice Sotomayor sentencing law and policy blog summaries levins v state 28 U.S.C. § 2254 § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing eleventh circuit ruling battles v state keith v state negligent homicide legende v state hall v florida § 13A-3-23 homicide Lucky D Arcade eighth amendment, fourth amendment theft of property st clair county alabama alabama supreme court Alonzo Ephraim benjamin todd acton christmas shooting dekalb county alabama blount county alabama lauderdale county alabama court of criminal appeals cullman alabama decatur alabama rainbow city alabama gun control Neil Gorsuch department of justice stoves v state Easter debtor prison Donald Trump, homicide rate russell calhoun OJ Simpson Made in America Tracie Todd ring v arizona capital murder brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix florence alabama court of criminal appeal releases economic growth drug busts mike gilotti second amendment gadsden alabama William Pryor criminal justice Walker County Alabama department of justice, underage drinking debit card skimming scams baltimore city circuit court hanceville alabama concealed carry stanley brent chapman mountain brook alabama utah supreme court Marengo County Alabama home repair fraud habeas corpus relief operation crackdown Etowah County Alabama, Malone v State constitutional law, ex parte briseno huntsville abandonment Glaze v State campbell v state parole state of arizona netflix brendan dassey criminal mischief apprendi v new jersey Stephen Breyer dothan alabama Hillary Clinton, street racing crime of passion bessemer alabama fultondale alabama towles v state peyton pruitt fraudulent checks shooting public assistance fraud fraud Guy Terrell Junior Rule 32 mobile alabama strickland v washington lethal injection drugs morgan county alabama arson Tommy Arthur baldwin county alabama robberies alabama Fentanyl drug trafficking, drug activity shelby county maryland court of special appeals texas moore v texas npr clarence thomas New York Times tarrant alabama the mannequin challenge lethal injection prostitution sting anniston alabama, West Alabama bernard v north dakota kidnapping Kareem Dacar Gaymon bailey v us abuse executions Shonda Walker, brookside alabama oneonta alabama mulga alabama marion county birchfield v north dakota court systems, shoplifting making a murderer drug possession, SCOTUS, Alabaster alabama alabama criminal law roundup illegal gambling assault hoover alabama brady v maryland criminal justice reform, hurst v florida dora alabama capital offenses midazolam Mike Hubbard theft bomb threat judicial override lamar county death penalty blountsville alabama Ingmire v State Briarwood Presbyterian Church gun rights asia mcclain armed robbery domestic violence murder shooting death smith v state ake v oklahoma church robberies Pleasant Grove Alabama limestone county alabama aiding and abetting Xavier Beasley madison alabama ferguson missouri sarah koenig Wesley Adam Whitworth scotus warrantless blood draws fake kidnapping, state of alabama pell city alabama implied consent illegal gun carry breaking and entering calhoun county alabama forced isolation eric sterling steve avery Sardis Alabama adger alabama kimberly alabama Adamsville alabama albertville alabama huntsville alabama serial aziz sayyed Dylann Roof brian fredick lucas Joshua Reese endangerment of a child cherokee county alabama operation bullseye mccalla alabama springville alabama drug crimes alabama law enforcement agency heflin alabama fort payne alabama morris alabama social media pinson alabama terell corey mcmullin embezzlement OJ Simpson burglary christian guitierez drug smuggling greene county alabama attempted murder alfonso morris animal cruelty drug seizure warrior alabama self defense hoax destructive devices mount olive alabama road rage pelham alabama trussville alabama Jefferson County Alabama heritage christian university narcotics investigation adnan syed, hurst mandamus domestic abuse sheffield v state LWOP tuscaloosa alabama minor offenses sexual assault beylund v north dakota south carolina foley alabama capital punishment boaz alabama banville v state US Supreme Court Update montgomery alabama abduction moving violations jerry bohannon avondale alabama talladega superspeedway Woods v State identity theft nicholas hawkins Samuel Alito mcwilliams v dunn car accident constitutional violations john earle redfearn IV v state pruitt v state Thomas Hardiman birmingham alabama CCA update nathan woods Eutaw Alabama 2016 election, unlawful manufacturing Benn v State



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.