CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016

Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.

2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.


Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)

Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.

Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)

In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).


Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)


Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.


Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)

Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.


Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)


This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State


If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


ring v arizona talladega superspeedway Alonzo Ephraim car accident Wesley Adam Whitworth parole battles v state implied consent mountain brook alabama fairfield alabama, fultondale alabama Samuel Alito forced isolation utah supreme court negligent homicide gun rights LWOP fake kidnapping, terell corey mcmullin lethal injection drugs huntsville OJ Simpson court of criminal appeals heritage christian university department of justice pruitt v state Walker County Alabama betton v state Guy Terrell Junior Donald Trump, foley alabama baldwin county alabama court of criminal appeal releases Fentanyl homicide West Alabama sentencing law and policy blog summaries Tommy Arthur constitutional law, aziz sayyed apprendi v new jersey theft asia mcclain alabama midazolam Justice Sotomayor serial abandonment fraud brady v maryland breaking and entering warrior alabama US Supreme Court Update gadsden alabama concealed carry Benn v State heflin alabama smith v state sheffield v state second amendment Shonda Walker, aiding and abetting banville v state alabama law enforcement agency shoplifting Sardis Alabama Marengo County Alabama unlawful manufacturing minor offenses William Pryor brookside alabama marion county pelham alabama st clair county alabama kimberly alabama shooting state of alabama constitutional violations Easter New York Times montgomery alabama hoover alabama Hillary Clinton, pinson alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix avondale alabama abuse fort payne alabama edwards v arizona criminal justice reform, hanceville alabama dora alabama eighth amendment, beylund v north dakota drug possession, mike gilotti street racing lethal injection sixth amendment npr Pleasant Grove Alabama mobile alabama Etowah County Alabama, animal cruelty § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing Kay Ivey adnan syed, towles v state habeas corpus relief Glaze v State christmas shooting Thomas Hardiman death penalty Rule 32 CCA update kidnapping greene county alabama brian fredick lucas legende v state mount olive alabama bessemer alabama drug seizure illegal gambling death penalty, stanley brent chapman peyton pruitt shelby county morgan county alabama drug smuggling capital punishment eleventh circuit ruling anniston alabama, criminal justice dekalb county alabama sexual assault identity theft ake v oklahoma stoves v state cullman alabama crime of passion oneonta alabama limestone county alabama morris alabama felony assaults john earle redfearn IV v state operation crackdown drug crimes drug busts madison alabama texas mccalla alabama executions narcotics investigation eugene lee jones v state birchfield v north dakota eric sterling murder christian guitierez nathan woods gun control maryland court of special appeals pell city alabama birmingham alabama sarah koenig self defense alfonso morris benjamin todd acton shooting death social media jerry bohannon operation bullseye editorial mulga alabama dothan alabama tarrant alabama steve avery robberies debit card skimming scams Kareem Dacar Gaymon Lucky D Arcade drug activity bailey v us Gardendale Alabama keith v state burglary Stephen Breyer arson road rage adger alabama Alabaster alabama blount county alabama Tracie Todd court systems, blountsville alabama capital murder mcwilliams v dunn 28 U.S.C. § 2254 criminal mischief cherokee county alabama clarence thomas endangerment of a child calhoun county alabama assault SCOTUS, the mannequin challenge Ingmire v State brendan dassey home repair fraud theft of property prostitution sting lauderdale county alabama Eutaw Alabama florence alabama alabama criminal law roundup debtor prison baltimore city circuit court bomb threat trussville alabama alabama supreme court scotus abduction underage drinking russell calhoun Neil Gorsuch Woods v State ferguson missouri kenneth eugene billups boaz alabama hurst v florida hoax destructive devices campbell v state hurst mandamus economic growth decatur alabama OJ Simpson Made in America huntsville alabama state of arizona making a murderer Mike Hubbard albertville alabama § 13A-3-23 springville alabama drug trafficking, department of justice, levins v state bernard v north dakota attempted murder armed robbery public assistance fraud lamar county netflix utah v strieff Joshua Reese Adamsville alabama fourth amendment fraudulent checks Dylann Roof embezzlement domestic abuse rainbow city alabama domestic violence warrantless blood draws moving violations illegal gun carry nicholas hawkins strickland v washington ex parte briseno Malone v State 2016 election, hall v florida capital offenses tuscaloosa alabama homicide rate moore v texas judicial override Jefferson County Alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church church robberies Xavier Beasley south carolina



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.