CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016

Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.

2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.


Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)

Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.

Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)

In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).


Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)


Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.


Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)

Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.


Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)


This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State


If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


campbell v state New York Times constitutional law, utah v strieff adger alabama blount county alabama levins v state towles v state church robberies eugene lee jones v state warrior alabama Xavier Beasley OJ Simpson Made in America heflin alabama fraud alfonso morris hall v florida aiding and abetting department of justice, sexual assault huntsville baltimore city circuit court pruitt v state mobile alabama street racing Adamsville alabama oneonta alabama bessemer alabama russell calhoun US Supreme Court Update smith v state ex parte briseno mike gilotti implied consent dora alabama birchfield v north dakota abuse drug activity baldwin county alabama edwards v arizona arson eleventh circuit ruling terell corey mcmullin unlawful manufacturing drug busts editorial court systems, Justice Sotomayor debtor prison William Pryor mount olive alabama serial debit card skimming scams rainbow city alabama drug trafficking, theft of property crime of passion Lucky D Arcade drug seizure stanley brent chapman Tommy Arthur Fentanyl home repair fraud shelby county Donald Trump, fultondale alabama mcwilliams v dunn Tracie Todd brian fredick lucas criminal justice Briarwood Presbyterian Church lethal injection alabama criminal law roundup self defense dothan alabama identity theft betton v state maryland court of special appeals netflix road rage Shonda Walker, Gardendale Alabama tuscaloosa alabama death penalty hanceville alabama huntsville alabama scotus drug crimes Etowah County Alabama, mccalla alabama minor offenses kenneth eugene billups lethal injection drugs Alonzo Ephraim stoves v state fake kidnapping, judicial override ring v arizona department of justice morris alabama drug possession, concealed carry Joshua Reese mulga alabama operation bullseye beylund v north dakota Kay Ivey 28 U.S.C. § 2254 banville v state fort payne alabama florence alabama endangerment of a child lauderdale county alabama fairfield alabama, trussville alabama Malone v State sheffield v state Alabaster alabama § 13A-3-23 aziz sayyed benjamin todd acton birmingham alabama pelham alabama Hillary Clinton, breaking and entering calhoun county alabama battles v state utah supreme court Ingmire v State criminal mischief Samuel Alito theft Kareem Dacar Gaymon blountsville alabama nathan woods brendan dassey peyton pruitt kimberly alabama pell city alabama OJ Simpson Stephen Breyer Pleasant Grove Alabama boaz alabama Walker County Alabama cullman alabama animal cruelty Jefferson County Alabama christmas shooting keith v state limestone county alabama the mannequin challenge Wesley Adam Whitworth capital punishment homicide rate moore v texas alabama death penalty, Neil Gorsuch alabama supreme court attempted murder Sardis Alabama car accident domestic violence south carolina robberies forced isolation Mike Hubbard pinson alabama nicholas hawkins felony assaults Thomas Hardiman hoover alabama marion county habeas corpus relief hurst mandamus § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing embezzlement burglary West Alabama economic growth homicide prostitution sting Dylann Roof armed robbery Guy Terrell Junior warrantless blood draws Glaze v State dekalb county alabama greene county alabama illegal gambling springville alabama abandonment Woods v State alabama law enforcement agency shooting death brookside alabama bernard v north dakota jerry bohannon domestic abuse eric sterling asia mcclain decatur alabama npr capital murder assault brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix john earle redfearn IV v state st clair county alabama gun control steve avery kidnapping sixth amendment state of alabama legende v state state of arizona clarence thomas capital offenses cherokee county alabama avondale alabama bomb threat bailey v us shoplifting heritage christian university mountain brook alabama narcotics investigation shooting ferguson missouri albertville alabama executions eighth amendment, parole Easter midazolam fraudulent checks negligent homicide moving violations texas apprendi v new jersey sarah koenig anniston alabama, lamar county abduction talladega superspeedway drug smuggling illegal gun carry hurst v florida underage drinking morgan county alabama hoax destructive devices tarrant alabama gun rights Rule 32 madison alabama adnan syed, montgomery alabama constitutional violations Benn v State Marengo County Alabama operation crackdown gadsden alabama sentencing law and policy blog summaries fourth amendment christian guitierez public assistance fraud foley alabama court of criminal appeal releases ake v oklahoma Eutaw Alabama social media court of criminal appeals brady v maryland second amendment 2016 election, making a murderer SCOTUS, LWOP CCA update criminal justice reform, murder strickland v washington



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.