CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016

Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.

2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.


Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)

Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.

Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)

In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).


Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)


Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.


Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)

Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.


Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)


This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State


If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


Marengo County Alabama criminal justice reform, asia mcclain drug seizure adger alabama constitutional violations sentencing law and policy blog summaries kidnapping clarence thomas hurst v florida abuse drug smuggling Eutaw Alabama avondale alabama legende v state pruitt v state ferguson missouri mount olive alabama keith v state fraud embezzlement fairfield alabama, Xavier Beasley levins v state New York Times editorial decatur alabama ring v arizona russell calhoun Ingmire v State OJ Simpson scotus tuscaloosa alabama homicide rate south carolina boaz alabama murder marion county smith v state breaking and entering jerry bohannon Woods v State Stephen Breyer social media terell corey mcmullin court systems, towles v state felony assaults huntsville mike gilotti capital punishment lethal injection drugs maryland court of special appeals talladega superspeedway death penalty, apprendi v new jersey brian fredick lucas eugene lee jones v state Briarwood Presbyterian Church negligent homicide betton v state serial home repair fraud hoover alabama albertville alabama Sardis Alabama brady v maryland warrior alabama constitutional law, fourth amendment shoplifting concealed carry lamar county kimberly alabama CCA update mountain brook alabama theft of property road rage warrantless blood draws sixth amendment mccalla alabama blountsville alabama Neil Gorsuch nathan woods hurst mandamus campbell v state ex parte briseno crime of passion gun control shooting death parole operation bullseye bessemer alabama baldwin county alabama homicide Etowah County Alabama, armed robbery lauderdale county alabama utah supreme court criminal mischief eleventh circuit ruling domestic abuse Fentanyl drug crimes abandonment Alonzo Ephraim stanley brent chapman texas mobile alabama st clair county alabama fraudulent checks church robberies alabama criminal law roundup bomb threat Tracie Todd blount county alabama prostitution sting public assistance fraud robberies underage drinking Benn v State hoax destructive devices hanceville alabama Rule 32 § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing gun rights pinson alabama battles v state anniston alabama, foley alabama SCOTUS, § 13A-3-23 illegal gambling street racing alabama supreme court mcwilliams v dunn identity theft Justice Sotomayor Wesley Adam Whitworth Walker County Alabama endangerment of a child second amendment midazolam aiding and abetting capital murder trussville alabama attempted murder implied consent benjamin todd acton mulga alabama birmingham alabama arson state of arizona state of alabama alfonso morris huntsville alabama court of criminal appeals theft eric sterling fultondale alabama madison alabama eighth amendment, springville alabama steve avery sarah koenig limestone county alabama cullman alabama npr lethal injection shelby county habeas corpus relief Dylann Roof heflin alabama montgomery alabama oneonta alabama Joshua Reese forced isolation narcotics investigation executions Tommy Arthur pell city alabama William Pryor florence alabama unlawful manufacturing illegal gun carry drug trafficking, birchfield v north dakota morgan county alabama calhoun county alabama peyton pruitt aziz sayyed Adamsville alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama cherokee county alabama beylund v north dakota baltimore city circuit court dekalb county alabama operation crackdown making a murderer fake kidnapping, stoves v state tarrant alabama drug activity morris alabama ake v oklahoma gadsden alabama capital offenses nicholas hawkins Thomas Hardiman moore v texas assault 28 U.S.C. § 2254 kenneth eugene billups Mike Hubbard LWOP Alabaster alabama Samuel Alito criminal justice department of justice, heritage christian university christmas shooting rainbow city alabama Glaze v State edwards v arizona Kay Ivey Shonda Walker, netflix sheffield v state hall v florida shooting abduction banville v state US Supreme Court Update Easter brookside alabama 2016 election, judicial override dothan alabama court of criminal appeal releases christian guitierez department of justice drug busts West Alabama greene county alabama strickland v washington domestic violence Lucky D Arcade utah v strieff Hillary Clinton, self defense moving violations car accident fort payne alabama bailey v us the mannequin challenge alabama law enforcement agency minor offenses pelham alabama sexual assault Malone v State Kareem Dacar Gaymon john earle redfearn IV v state Jefferson County Alabama Guy Terrell Junior brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix dora alabama economic growth adnan syed, OJ Simpson Made in America animal cruelty drug possession, bernard v north dakota debtor prison Donald Trump, alabama debit card skimming scams Gardendale Alabama brendan dassey death penalty burglary



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.