CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016

Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.

2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.


Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)

Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.

Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)

In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).


Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)


Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.


Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)

Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.


Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)


This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State


If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


embezzlement bailey v us road rage Stephen Breyer death penalty mike gilotti Thomas Hardiman felony assaults ring v arizona burglary constitutional law, benjamin todd acton operation crackdown mulga alabama springville alabama utah v strieff trussville alabama alabama criminal law roundup car accident rainbow city alabama Neil Gorsuch cherokee county alabama florence alabama shooting keith v state Alabaster alabama hall v florida drug busts madison alabama tuscaloosa alabama theft birmingham alabama debit card skimming scams crime of passion sexual assault eugene lee jones v state Tommy Arthur fraudulent checks john earle redfearn IV v state hoax destructive devices habeas corpus relief Jefferson County Alabama heritage christian university robberies birchfield v north dakota levins v state Justice Sotomayor drug smuggling beylund v north dakota lethal injection illegal gambling moving violations Donald Trump, baltimore city circuit court parole Samuel Alito dekalb county alabama stanley brent chapman sixth amendment criminal justice § 13A-3-23 armed robbery dothan alabama Sardis Alabama morgan county alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama stoves v state terell corey mcmullin dora alabama foley alabama drug crimes brian fredick lucas jerry bohannon attempted murder Eutaw Alabama operation bullseye Ingmire v State scotus calhoun county alabama christmas shooting abandonment Glaze v State fort payne alabama breaking and entering abduction warrior alabama Xavier Beasley Kareem Dacar Gaymon albertville alabama Malone v State bernard v north dakota department of justice edwards v arizona Hillary Clinton, blount county alabama Fentanyl banville v state court systems, capital offenses campbell v state ex parte briseno marion county apprendi v new jersey OJ Simpson Made in America steve avery nicholas hawkins debtor prison minor offenses capital punishment Marengo County Alabama underage drinking asia mcclain heflin alabama netflix boaz alabama mount olive alabama LWOP shelby county mobile alabama adger alabama hurst v florida nathan woods strickland v washington midazolam street racing st clair county alabama baldwin county alabama clarence thomas illegal gun carry lamar county serial OJ Simpson Gardendale Alabama cullman alabama gadsden alabama alfonso morris Tracie Todd warrantless blood draws adnan syed, hanceville alabama fraud alabama executions bomb threat hoover alabama animal cruelty npr New York Times mcwilliams v dunn legende v state drug possession, Easter judicial override fairfield alabama, church robberies endangerment of a child sheffield v state towles v state concealed carry kidnapping Benn v State Rule 32 eleventh circuit ruling court of criminal appeals talladega superspeedway arson Shonda Walker, tarrant alabama bessemer alabama theft of property second amendment lethal injection drugs § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing US Supreme Court Update editorial self defense texas department of justice, russell calhoun shoplifting drug trafficking, forced isolation Alonzo Ephraim 2016 election, south carolina brady v maryland moore v texas brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix the mannequin challenge aziz sayyed mccalla alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 limestone county alabama alabama law enforcement agency Adamsville alabama making a murderer negligent homicide eighth amendment, gun rights prostitution sting economic growth greene county alabama fourth amendment domestic abuse homicide rate ferguson missouri montgomery alabama drug seizure sentencing law and policy blog summaries huntsville murder constitutional violations kimberly alabama oneonta alabama christian guitierez criminal mischief CCA update Woods v State battles v state pruitt v state identity theft pell city alabama court of criminal appeal releases abuse death penalty, pinson alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth narcotics investigation huntsville alabama capital murder decatur alabama shooting death West Alabama Dylann Roof Lucky D Arcade avondale alabama blountsville alabama ake v oklahoma Briarwood Presbyterian Church homicide state of alabama William Pryor aiding and abetting betton v state brookside alabama assault SCOTUS, drug activity morris alabama eric sterling domestic violence utah supreme court Joshua Reese maryland court of special appeals Walker County Alabama criminal justice reform, fake kidnapping, brendan dassey Etowah County Alabama, home repair fraud social media smith v state pelham alabama public assistance fraud anniston alabama, gun control peyton pruitt lauderdale county alabama hurst mandamus Mike Hubbard state of arizona kenneth eugene billups fultondale alabama implied consent Guy Terrell Junior alabama supreme court Kay Ivey mountain brook alabama unlawful manufacturing sarah koenig



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.