CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016

Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.

2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.


Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)

Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.

Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)

In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).


Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)


Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.


Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)

Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.


Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)


This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State


If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


Mike Hubbard judicial override Etowah County Alabama, second amendment editorial fourth amendment Jefferson County Alabama constitutional law, sentencing law and policy blog summaries abduction capital offenses eleventh circuit ruling Shonda Walker, Woods v State russell calhoun ake v oklahoma eighth amendment, Adamsville alabama home repair fraud robberies drug possession, stanley brent chapman fort payne alabama Neil Gorsuch heflin alabama hanceville alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth Rule 32 gun rights brian fredick lucas debit card skimming scams benjamin todd acton anniston alabama, Briarwood Presbyterian Church lauderdale county alabama heritage christian university brady v maryland beylund v north dakota springville alabama burglary strickland v washington stoves v state npr scotus Malone v State fraudulent checks utah v strieff tuscaloosa alabama pruitt v state theft baltimore city circuit court warrior alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon sexual assault court of criminal appeals eugene lee jones v state shoplifting apprendi v new jersey gadsden alabama Walker County Alabama aziz sayyed debtor prison Guy Terrell Junior Easter cullman alabama William Pryor Glaze v State adnan syed, animal cruelty forced isolation domestic abuse making a murderer alabama law enforcement agency domestic violence theft of property Tracie Todd betton v state armed robbery arson john earle redfearn IV v state midazolam Dylann Roof smith v state Sardis Alabama mobile alabama drug crimes identity theft Marengo County Alabama huntsville christian guitierez abandonment capital murder keith v state pinson alabama operation crackdown Kay Ivey hurst mandamus alfonso morris § 13A-3-23 fultondale alabama oneonta alabama eric sterling Lucky D Arcade bomb threat sarah koenig street racing adger alabama drug smuggling OJ Simpson Thomas Hardiman department of justice serial alabama criminal law roundup utah supreme court south carolina Joshua Reese madison alabama prostitution sting alabama Benn v State texas decatur alabama Ingmire v State operation bullseye bessemer alabama steve avery shelby county banville v state ex parte briseno moving violations breaking and entering concealed carry Xavier Beasley florence alabama homicide rate sixth amendment economic growth sheffield v state avondale alabama montgomery alabama kimberly alabama mike gilotti pell city alabama murder shooting Samuel Alito huntsville alabama drug trafficking, pelham alabama mulga alabama Hillary Clinton, moore v texas Gardendale Alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix endangerment of a child unlawful manufacturing dekalb county alabama attempted murder st clair county alabama Fentanyl albertville alabama greene county alabama Stephen Breyer road rage drug seizure habeas corpus relief kenneth eugene billups parole legende v state death penalty abuse brendan dassey morris alabama peyton pruitt lethal injection birmingham alabama tarrant alabama brookside alabama maryland court of special appeals executions New York Times battles v state clarence thomas Alabaster alabama negligent homicide West Alabama asia mcclain social media birchfield v north dakota illegal gambling felony assaults church robberies blount county alabama Tommy Arthur LWOP mcwilliams v dunn car accident fake kidnapping, warrantless blood draws levins v state dothan alabama minor offenses towles v state calhoun county alabama narcotics investigation rainbow city alabama hoax destructive devices OJ Simpson Made in America cherokee county alabama CCA update crime of passion blountsville alabama talladega superspeedway ring v arizona state of arizona state of alabama Donald Trump, alabama supreme court nicholas hawkins ferguson missouri limestone county alabama foley alabama embezzlement boaz alabama implied consent US Supreme Court Update drug busts Eutaw Alabama department of justice, fraud capital punishment lamar county morgan county alabama illegal gun carry bailey v us edwards v arizona christmas shooting criminal justice baldwin county alabama mountain brook alabama SCOTUS, terell corey mcmullin assault trussville alabama constitutional violations court of criminal appeal releases death penalty, mccalla alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing aiding and abetting netflix mount olive alabama jerry bohannon criminal mischief hall v florida self defense lethal injection drugs court systems, criminal justice reform, hurst v florida kidnapping drug activity underage drinking nathan woods Pleasant Grove Alabama dora alabama homicide campbell v state 2016 election, marion county bernard v north dakota Alonzo Ephraim gun control hoover alabama public assistance fraud 28 U.S.C. § 2254 the mannequin challenge Justice Sotomayor shooting death fairfield alabama,



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.