CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016

Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.

2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.


Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)

Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.

Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)

In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).


Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)


Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.


Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)

Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.


Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)


This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State


If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


Easter warrior alabama sixth amendment parole tuscaloosa alabama calhoun county alabama § 13A-3-23 breaking and entering court of criminal appeals hurst v florida limestone county alabama asia mcclain court of criminal appeal releases implied consent sentencing law and policy blog summaries murder Stephen Breyer dothan alabama Xavier Beasley kidnapping eighth amendment, fairfield alabama, hoover alabama debtor prison foley alabama concealed carry mcwilliams v dunn morgan county alabama abandonment sheffield v state pinson alabama utah supreme court adnan syed, brian fredick lucas criminal mischief john earle redfearn IV v state shooting death Neil Gorsuch beylund v north dakota endangerment of a child montgomery alabama moving violations Pleasant Grove Alabama ex parte briseno lamar county blountsville alabama gadsden alabama blount county alabama judicial override drug seizure mountain brook alabama assault hanceville alabama department of justice ake v oklahoma theft of property embezzlement economic growth felony assaults stoves v state CCA update npr albertville alabama Benn v State OJ Simpson Made in America bailey v us alfonso morris Briarwood Presbyterian Church abuse dora alabama morris alabama betton v state greene county alabama smith v state brookside alabama keith v state identity theft shoplifting anniston alabama, Sardis Alabama Tommy Arthur hall v florida fourth amendment OJ Simpson drug trafficking, editorial car accident Samuel Alito drug smuggling department of justice, SCOTUS, christian guitierez negligent homicide warrantless blood draws fake kidnapping, baldwin county alabama domestic violence edwards v arizona Kay Ivey fraudulent checks decatur alabama drug busts drug possession, Tracie Todd operation crackdown pell city alabama Adamsville alabama sexual assault trussville alabama towles v state shelby county robberies illegal gun carry banville v state fultondale alabama campbell v state springville alabama William Pryor levins v state Joshua Reese brendan dassey Thomas Hardiman church robberies abduction heritage christian university 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Justice Sotomayor talladega superspeedway Alonzo Ephraim drug crimes state of alabama Glaze v State Wesley Adam Whitworth hoax destructive devices Dylann Roof drug activity Woods v State moore v texas mount olive alabama legende v state debit card skimming scams stanley brent chapman habeas corpus relief fraud pruitt v state serial strickland v washington self defense alabama criminal law roundup bessemer alabama Walker County Alabama making a murderer tarrant alabama Lucky D Arcade terell corey mcmullin mobile alabama sarah koenig lethal injection drugs eleventh circuit ruling illegal gambling New York Times kenneth eugene billups lethal injection aziz sayyed baltimore city circuit court Gardendale Alabama LWOP cullman alabama oneonta alabama rainbow city alabama Alabaster alabama constitutional law, Marengo County Alabama fort payne alabama benjamin todd acton Etowah County Alabama, nicholas hawkins nathan woods Eutaw Alabama adger alabama narcotics investigation russell calhoun aiding and abetting Guy Terrell Junior scotus home repair fraud theft second amendment dekalb county alabama public assistance fraud marion county maryland court of special appeals clarence thomas death penalty, avondale alabama capital punishment eric sterling capital murder peyton pruitt hurst mandamus bomb threat state of arizona Fentanyl criminal justice reform, eugene lee jones v state domestic abuse death penalty christmas shooting texas animal cruelty arson battles v state birchfield v north dakota gun rights florence alabama alabama mccalla alabama road rage social media south carolina Malone v State boaz alabama bernard v north dakota heflin alabama court systems, brady v maryland alabama supreme court Mike Hubbard Donald Trump, 2016 election, huntsville burglary homicide ferguson missouri attempted murder criminal justice armed robbery Hillary Clinton, midazolam Kareem Dacar Gaymon netflix homicide rate huntsville alabama executions Jefferson County Alabama mike gilotti utah v strieff st clair county alabama Rule 32 Shonda Walker, Ingmire v State the mannequin challenge capital offenses lauderdale county alabama West Alabama pelham alabama alabama law enforcement agency birmingham alabama minor offenses gun control kimberly alabama unlawful manufacturing mulga alabama underage drinking US Supreme Court Update prostitution sting apprendi v new jersey madison alabama forced isolation jerry bohannon ring v arizona § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing operation bullseye shooting brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix crime of passion cherokee county alabama steve avery constitutional violations street racing



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.