CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016


Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.

 


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.


2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.

 

Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)


Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.


Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)


In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).

 

Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)

 

Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.

 

Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)


Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.

 

Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)

 

This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

death penalty, underage drinking animal cruelty Xavier Beasley drug crimes montgomery alabama abandonment pell city alabama judicial override sentencing law and policy blog summaries dora alabama jerry bohannon Woods v State economic growth Marengo County Alabama Fentanyl moving violations Tracie Todd court of criminal appeals bessemer alabama constitutional law, heritage christian university warrior alabama LWOP Alabaster alabama benjamin todd acton attempted murder alabama burglary aiding and abetting mike gilotti florence alabama maryland court of special appeals blount county alabama apprendi v new jersey utah v strieff peyton pruitt hoover alabama levins v state gadsden alabama battles v state kimberly alabama drug busts Hillary Clinton, implied consent serial shooting death US Supreme Court Update armed robbery christian guitierez brendan dassey state of arizona kenneth eugene billups Adamsville alabama Eutaw Alabama the mannequin challenge beylund v north dakota bailey v us Alonzo Ephraim fairfield alabama, Kareem Dacar Gaymon Kay Ivey Ingmire v State capital offenses brookside alabama car accident murder cherokee county alabama decatur alabama mobile alabama crime of passion William Pryor state of alabama homicide morgan county alabama Glaze v State fort payne alabama fake kidnapping, making a murderer hurst v florida Thomas Hardiman john earle redfearn IV v state midazolam asia mcclain foley alabama brady v maryland prostitution sting trussville alabama avondale alabama alabama criminal law roundup § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing stoves v state Justice Sotomayor bomb threat ex parte briseno nathan woods illegal gun carry pinson alabama alfonso morris drug trafficking, Rule 32 alabama law enforcement agency drug smuggling second amendment Tommy Arthur fultondale alabama OJ Simpson Made in America debit card skimming scams Donald Trump, Easter CCA update npr strickland v washington domestic abuse mount olive alabama eleventh circuit ruling mountain brook alabama clarence thomas scotus eric sterling home repair fraud hoax destructive devices operation crackdown 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus relief edwards v arizona endangerment of a child sheffield v state self defense criminal justice reform, domestic violence lauderdale county alabama 2016 election, utah supreme court adnan syed, abduction § 13A-3-23 boaz alabama operation bullseye Guy Terrell Junior fraudulent checks Samuel Alito street racing gun rights terell corey mcmullin Wesley Adam Whitworth drug activity Jefferson County Alabama Stephen Breyer mulga alabama cullman alabama lamar county adger alabama negligent homicide Briarwood Presbyterian Church huntsville alabama baldwin county alabama alabama supreme court aziz sayyed Joshua Reese nicholas hawkins department of justice, criminal justice greene county alabama dekalb county alabama eugene lee jones v state minor offenses Etowah County Alabama, department of justice sexual assault betton v state homicide rate court of criminal appeal releases shooting albertville alabama abuse calhoun county alabama stanley brent chapman felony assaults OJ Simpson kidnapping drug possession, fourth amendment assault dothan alabama parole breaking and entering Benn v State smith v state Pleasant Grove Alabama drug seizure south carolina baltimore city circuit court fraud Dylann Roof constitutional violations ferguson missouri huntsville West Alabama madison alabama Shonda Walker, debtor prison theft of property birchfield v north dakota New York Times brian fredick lucas mccalla alabama tuscaloosa alabama theft rainbow city alabama social media Walker County Alabama legende v state robberies heflin alabama capital murder SCOTUS, church robberies keith v state Gardendale Alabama marion county sarah koenig arson sixth amendment mcwilliams v dunn texas springville alabama public assistance fraud lethal injection drugs talladega superspeedway brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix identity theft eighth amendment, steve avery moore v texas warrantless blood draws hurst mandamus narcotics investigation towles v state Mike Hubbard executions criminal mischief birmingham alabama concealed carry capital punishment hall v florida gun control editorial Malone v State lethal injection ake v oklahoma embezzlement campbell v state forced isolation road rage banville v state oneonta alabama blountsville alabama morris alabama pelham alabama Neil Gorsuch ring v arizona shelby county Lucky D Arcade st clair county alabama anniston alabama, illegal gambling pruitt v state Sardis Alabama unlawful manufacturing netflix death penalty shoplifting russell calhoun court systems, hanceville alabama christmas shooting tarrant alabama limestone county alabama bernard v north dakota

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.