CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016

Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.

2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.


Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)

Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.

Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)

In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).


Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)


Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.


Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)

Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.


Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)


This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State


If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


Kay Ivey crime of passion fort payne alabama florence alabama john earle redfearn IV v state moving violations criminal justice hall v florida brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix Alabaster alabama capital punishment christian guitierez baldwin county alabama Sardis Alabama concealed carry Malone v State Stephen Breyer Samuel Alito russell calhoun debit card skimming scams brady v maryland mountain brook alabama clarence thomas moore v texas habeas corpus relief morgan county alabama domestic abuse alabama law enforcement agency blount county alabama rainbow city alabama brookside alabama eugene lee jones v state robberies battles v state illegal gambling pell city alabama Woods v State Mike Hubbard kidnapping hurst v florida alfonso morris eric sterling Adamsville alabama south carolina keith v state benjamin todd acton fraudulent checks fraud montgomery alabama felony assaults gun rights dothan alabama abduction ferguson missouri kimberly alabama assault morris alabama fake kidnapping, edwards v arizona tuscaloosa alabama animal cruelty birmingham alabama Easter cherokee county alabama criminal mischief public assistance fraud heflin alabama theft negligent homicide tarrant alabama brendan dassey bessemer alabama cullman alabama sheffield v state banville v state Guy Terrell Junior department of justice Glaze v State forced isolation pelham alabama drug possession, Thomas Hardiman levins v state judicial override theft of property eighth amendment, church robberies constitutional violations lamar county alabama supreme court street racing armed robbery drug busts huntsville § 13A-3-23 Rule 32 maryland court of special appeals domestic violence Eutaw Alabama fourth amendment parole SCOTUS, heritage christian university anniston alabama, West Alabama boaz alabama mike gilotti drug trafficking, beylund v north dakota sexual assault CCA update Gardendale Alabama Neil Gorsuch pinson alabama minor offenses Tracie Todd drug smuggling eleventh circuit ruling Shonda Walker, utah v strieff economic growth Walker County Alabama talladega superspeedway warrior alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon homicide unlawful manufacturing making a murderer adger alabama betton v state bailey v us ring v arizona baltimore city circuit court marion county lethal injection drugs court of criminal appeals asia mcclain adnan syed, strickland v washington Benn v State springville alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth social media Etowah County Alabama, Briarwood Presbyterian Church abuse the mannequin challenge court systems, stanley brent chapman death penalty, bernard v north dakota christmas shooting drug seizure kenneth eugene billups legende v state lauderdale county alabama avondale alabama constitutional law, scotus foley alabama OJ Simpson Made in America § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing limestone county alabama mccalla alabama shoplifting smith v state calhoun county alabama implied consent Fentanyl attempted murder shelby county utah supreme court car accident murder nathan woods trussville alabama netflix 28 U.S.C. § 2254 greene county alabama New York Times breaking and entering capital offenses Xavier Beasley alabama criminal law roundup Lucky D Arcade William Pryor decatur alabama gun control arson debtor prison LWOP aiding and abetting death penalty campbell v state second amendment mount olive alabama ex parte briseno brian fredick lucas operation crackdown underage drinking birchfield v north dakota oneonta alabama aziz sayyed st clair county alabama mulga alabama serial court of criminal appeal releases fairfield alabama, hanceville alabama OJ Simpson Justice Sotomayor drug crimes dekalb county alabama terell corey mcmullin executions editorial nicholas hawkins endangerment of a child prostitution sting burglary sentencing law and policy blog summaries state of arizona shooting death lethal injection towles v state warrantless blood draws hoover alabama bomb threat narcotics investigation department of justice, ake v oklahoma homicide rate Pleasant Grove Alabama blountsville alabama alabama steve avery identity theft illegal gun carry embezzlement peyton pruitt fultondale alabama Marengo County Alabama self defense home repair fraud Donald Trump, albertville alabama drug activity Jefferson County Alabama npr stoves v state dora alabama gadsden alabama huntsville alabama road rage apprendi v new jersey criminal justice reform, madison alabama US Supreme Court Update Tommy Arthur Ingmire v State Joshua Reese Dylann Roof jerry bohannon mobile alabama state of alabama texas sarah koenig hoax destructive devices Alonzo Ephraim capital murder shooting Hillary Clinton, hurst mandamus abandonment 2016 election, pruitt v state midazolam mcwilliams v dunn operation bullseye sixth amendment



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.