CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016

Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.

2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.


Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)

Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.

Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)

In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).


Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)


Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.


Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)

Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.


Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)


This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State


If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


breaking and entering calhoun county alabama New York Times battles v state prostitution sting Wesley Adam Whitworth abduction Glaze v State mcwilliams v dunn state of alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix limestone county alabama abuse madison alabama drug seizure brookside alabama Stephen Breyer William Pryor CCA update abandonment pelham alabama adger alabama LWOP towles v state felony assaults drug crimes aiding and abetting Dylann Roof alabama law enforcement agency ake v oklahoma street racing eric sterling alabama Thomas Hardiman operation bullseye Kareem Dacar Gaymon domestic violence home repair fraud boaz alabama tuscaloosa alabama Guy Terrell Junior fultondale alabama self defense warrantless blood draws bernard v north dakota aziz sayyed dothan alabama 2016 election, homicide rate identity theft ferguson missouri keith v state endangerment of a child warrior alabama rainbow city alabama criminal justice heflin alabama the mannequin challenge eugene lee jones v state Joshua Reese capital punishment homicide huntsville alabama sixth amendment gun control trussville alabama hurst v florida cullman alabama Neil Gorsuch christian guitierez pell city alabama SCOTUS, hoover alabama mobile alabama greene county alabama road rage netflix kidnapping Walker County Alabama robberies habeas corpus relief blount county alabama fraudulent checks pruitt v state levins v state oneonta alabama Tracie Todd Lucky D Arcade anniston alabama, forced isolation hoax destructive devices decatur alabama shoplifting lamar county springville alabama fairfield alabama, brady v maryland huntsville Gardendale Alabama Justice Sotomayor hanceville alabama jerry bohannon constitutional violations criminal justice reform, Donald Trump, editorial banville v state West Alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 shooting Briarwood Presbyterian Church capital offenses montgomery alabama hurst mandamus Fentanyl criminal mischief betton v state brian fredick lucas court systems, drug possession, smith v state arson birchfield v north dakota Malone v State nicholas hawkins Rule 32 underage drinking second amendment fake kidnapping, Adamsville alabama tarrant alabama christmas shooting domestic abuse crime of passion Etowah County Alabama, death penalty, baltimore city circuit court cherokee county alabama moving violations Kay Ivey kimberly alabama drug smuggling mountain brook alabama court of criminal appeals nathan woods unlawful manufacturing judicial override Tommy Arthur Hillary Clinton, eleventh circuit ruling shelby county alabama supreme court making a murderer birmingham alabama texas concealed carry pinson alabama st clair county alabama edwards v arizona fourth amendment § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing sheffield v state terell corey mcmullin ex parte briseno shooting death Jefferson County Alabama Benn v State operation crackdown Xavier Beasley ring v arizona Alonzo Ephraim public assistance fraud armed robbery florence alabama lethal injection negligent homicide campbell v state assault narcotics investigation strickland v washington constitutional law, apprendi v new jersey car accident social media adnan syed, alabama criminal law roundup implied consent midazolam asia mcclain baldwin county alabama avondale alabama Woods v State steve avery Easter bomb threat church robberies sarah koenig minor offenses south carolina death penalty department of justice, Mike Hubbard blountsville alabama mulga alabama mount olive alabama maryland court of special appeals Pleasant Grove Alabama sentencing law and policy blog summaries brendan dassey embezzlement marion county capital murder lauderdale county alabama parole theft of property peyton pruitt gadsden alabama US Supreme Court Update scotus john earle redfearn IV v state stoves v state utah v strieff fort payne alabama § 13A-3-23 beylund v north dakota Marengo County Alabama heritage christian university burglary debit card skimming scams state of arizona npr russell calhoun gun rights albertville alabama clarence thomas mccalla alabama Alabaster alabama executions Samuel Alito drug busts animal cruelty Sardis Alabama fraud talladega superspeedway eighth amendment, morris alabama serial Ingmire v State illegal gun carry utah supreme court dekalb county alabama morgan county alabama hall v florida moore v texas Shonda Walker, OJ Simpson Made in America sexual assault stanley brent chapman drug activity economic growth lethal injection drugs kenneth eugene billups illegal gambling theft bessemer alabama dora alabama debtor prison murder foley alabama benjamin todd acton legende v state bailey v us OJ Simpson mike gilotti attempted murder alfonso morris drug trafficking, court of criminal appeal releases department of justice Eutaw Alabama



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.