CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016

Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.

2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.


Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)

Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.

Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)

In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).


Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)


Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.


Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)

Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.


Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)


This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State


If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


mccalla alabama tarrant alabama dora alabama habeas corpus relief decatur alabama pruitt v state court of criminal appeals baldwin county alabama heritage christian university Easter baltimore city circuit court Kareem Dacar Gaymon CCA update sexual assault New York Times eric sterling judicial override bomb threat Donald Trump, battles v state armed robbery betton v state tuscaloosa alabama Walker County Alabama criminal justice reform, Pleasant Grove Alabama edwards v arizona nicholas hawkins lamar county brady v maryland constitutional law, department of justice towles v state kimberly alabama Rule 32 the mannequin challenge ake v oklahoma ring v arizona aiding and abetting smith v state home repair fraud Alonzo Ephraim criminal mischief hall v florida SCOTUS, hurst v florida murder burglary mike gilotti William Pryor concealed carry scotus utah supreme court kenneth eugene billups Briarwood Presbyterian Church operation crackdown Jefferson County Alabama madison alabama alabama supreme court fultondale alabama court of criminal appeal releases morgan county alabama parole Hillary Clinton, street racing LWOP Kay Ivey rainbow city alabama crime of passion beylund v north dakota Malone v State death penalty Adamsville alabama Marengo County Alabama Glaze v State warrior alabama assault marion county Alabaster alabama homicide rate Guy Terrell Junior texas jerry bohannon gadsden alabama making a murderer minor offenses gun control asia mcclain hoax destructive devices apprendi v new jersey Sardis Alabama second amendment Justice Sotomayor maryland court of special appeals eugene lee jones v state steve avery brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix attempted murder fraudulent checks clarence thomas eleventh circuit ruling Gardendale Alabama car accident domestic violence adnan syed, road rage Dylann Roof hanceville alabama drug smuggling Fentanyl midazolam birchfield v north dakota stanley brent chapman nathan woods Tommy Arthur drug seizure fairfield alabama, brookside alabama felony assaults Xavier Beasley ferguson missouri montgomery alabama st clair county alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing criminal justice campbell v state keith v state gun rights illegal gambling executions fort payne alabama lethal injection drugs christmas shooting blountsville alabama negligent homicide alabama heflin alabama Tracie Todd Wesley Adam Whitworth prostitution sting florence alabama constitutional violations state of alabama implied consent Joshua Reese avondale alabama birmingham alabama moving violations alabama law enforcement agency illegal gun carry theft of property oneonta alabama foley alabama forced isolation peyton pruitt utah v strieff lethal injection boaz alabama fourth amendment npr § 13A-3-23 abduction social media greene county alabama Neil Gorsuch morris alabama aziz sayyed drug busts court systems, alabama criminal law roundup Stephen Breyer 2016 election, kidnapping department of justice, drug activity shooting death cherokee county alabama benjamin todd acton stoves v state Samuel Alito ex parte briseno animal cruelty russell calhoun drug possession, Thomas Hardiman breaking and entering Shonda Walker, dothan alabama Mike Hubbard sarah koenig levins v state brian fredick lucas bernard v north dakota serial pell city alabama shoplifting US Supreme Court Update christian guitierez strickland v washington Benn v State trussville alabama pelham alabama OJ Simpson drug trafficking, sentencing law and policy blog summaries endangerment of a child netflix capital murder mount olive alabama shooting john earle redfearn IV v state church robberies adger alabama Eutaw Alabama Lucky D Arcade 28 U.S.C. § 2254 unlawful manufacturing calhoun county alabama south carolina public assistance fraud sixth amendment mountain brook alabama death penalty, economic growth embezzlement robberies albertville alabama moore v texas state of arizona underage drinking banville v state alfonso morris pinson alabama shelby county bailey v us fake kidnapping, mobile alabama debtor prison abandonment homicide capital punishment OJ Simpson Made in America eighth amendment, Woods v State debit card skimming scams West Alabama self defense bessemer alabama talladega superspeedway Etowah County Alabama, operation bullseye dekalb county alabama identity theft fraud mcwilliams v dunn huntsville alabama Ingmire v State terell corey mcmullin hurst mandamus blount county alabama cullman alabama sheffield v state brendan dassey theft editorial hoover alabama domestic abuse abuse narcotics investigation limestone county alabama legende v state capital offenses lauderdale county alabama mulga alabama springville alabama drug crimes anniston alabama, warrantless blood draws huntsville arson



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.