CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016


Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.

 


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.


2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.

 

Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)


Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.


Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)


In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).

 

Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)

 

Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.

 

Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)


Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.

 

Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)

 

This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

Gardendale Alabama death penalty, Sardis Alabama Tommy Arthur debtor prison department of justice narcotics investigation Ingmire v State alabama warrantless blood draws street racing assault executions Adamsville alabama alabama supreme court bomb threat cherokee county alabama Woods v State pruitt v state burglary nathan woods utah supreme court Tracie Todd the mannequin challenge Briarwood Presbyterian Church avondale alabama shoplifting drug trafficking, fraudulent checks heflin alabama state of arizona mccalla alabama murder eighth amendment, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 public assistance fraud negligent homicide court systems, limestone county alabama npr endangerment of a child Etowah County Alabama, huntsville alabama gun control capital punishment stanley brent chapman morgan county alabama bernard v north dakota ring v arizona mobile alabama dora alabama netflix operation bullseye pell city alabama apprendi v new jersey hoover alabama sentencing law and policy blog summaries drug busts abduction towles v state Alonzo Ephraim lamar county ake v oklahoma lethal injection Malone v State kidnapping midazolam anniston alabama, mount olive alabama betton v state capital offenses banville v state benjamin todd acton homicide rate crime of passion § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing boaz alabama arson capital murder birchfield v north dakota CCA update 2016 election, Guy Terrell Junior eleventh circuit ruling LWOP sheffield v state Glaze v State Shonda Walker, nicholas hawkins baltimore city circuit court embezzlement moore v texas Walker County Alabama morris alabama making a murderer sexual assault West Alabama heritage christian university eugene lee jones v state Donald Trump, asia mcclain domestic abuse criminal justice st clair county alabama lauderdale county alabama breaking and entering blountsville alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix New York Times strickland v washington home repair fraud felony assaults bailey v us fairfield alabama, prostitution sting Samuel Alito operation crackdown legende v state drug crimes kenneth eugene billups US Supreme Court Update alfonso morris Thomas Hardiman Mike Hubbard alabama criminal law roundup terell corey mcmullin montgomery alabama self defense trussville alabama Jefferson County Alabama rainbow city alabama madison alabama drug activity criminal justice reform, fourth amendment Kay Ivey drug seizure minor offenses abandonment implied consent pinson alabama hoax destructive devices marion county decatur alabama christmas shooting Joshua Reese theft Marengo County Alabama brendan dassey shooting death ex parte briseno social media dekalb county alabama illegal gambling peyton pruitt OJ Simpson Made in America hanceville alabama illegal gun carry fraud eric sterling brian fredick lucas aiding and abetting attempted murder john earle redfearn IV v state concealed carry second amendment armed robbery keith v state mountain brook alabama adnan syed, tuscaloosa alabama smith v state pelham alabama edwards v arizona cullman alabama forced isolation lethal injection drugs kimberly alabama russell calhoun talladega superspeedway theft of property Alabaster alabama car accident hurst mandamus court of criminal appeal releases Easter mulga alabama huntsville beylund v north dakota south carolina domestic violence shooting court of criminal appeals scotus fultondale alabama animal cruelty death penalty fake kidnapping, Rule 32 steve avery constitutional law, birmingham alabama state of alabama foley alabama shelby county sixth amendment Xavier Beasley Pleasant Grove Alabama levins v state mcwilliams v dunn dothan alabama oneonta alabama springville alabama blount county alabama brady v maryland maryland court of special appeals Hillary Clinton, drug possession, identity theft economic growth parole Justice Sotomayor editorial florence alabama Eutaw Alabama battles v state gun rights hurst v florida William Pryor utah v strieff Fentanyl stoves v state debit card skimming scams bessemer alabama warrior alabama calhoun county alabama alabama law enforcement agency Kareem Dacar Gaymon Dylann Roof constitutional violations habeas corpus relief ferguson missouri baldwin county alabama jerry bohannon criminal mischief gadsden alabama drug smuggling Stephen Breyer hall v florida robberies campbell v state church robberies homicide Benn v State aziz sayyed OJ Simpson albertville alabama clarence thomas Lucky D Arcade moving violations tarrant alabama SCOTUS, § 13A-3-23 road rage brookside alabama judicial override adger alabama abuse mike gilotti underage drinking fort payne alabama greene county alabama sarah koenig Neil Gorsuch texas christian guitierez Wesley Adam Whitworth serial unlawful manufacturing department of justice,

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.