CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016

Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.

2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.


Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)

Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.

Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)

In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).


Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)


Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.


Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)

Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.


Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)


This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State


If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


Ingmire v State drug busts terell corey mcmullin sixth amendment lamar county stanley brent chapman Glaze v State murder sarah koenig nicholas hawkins brian fredick lucas debit card skimming scams second amendment blount county alabama steve avery benjamin todd acton concealed carry robberies abduction negligent homicide Marengo County Alabama hoover alabama alabama supreme court fraudulent checks criminal justice reform, Donald Trump, Dylann Roof fairfield alabama, smith v state christian guitierez drug smuggling heritage christian university decatur alabama animal cruelty felony assaults Stephen Breyer drug seizure albertville alabama brady v maryland ake v oklahoma habeas corpus relief theft drug possession, jerry bohannon hall v florida christmas shooting 2016 election, § 13A-3-23 aziz sayyed domestic abuse attempted murder tarrant alabama nathan woods OJ Simpson Made in America narcotics investigation road rage avondale alabama edwards v arizona mccalla alabama fultondale alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing hanceville alabama Kay Ivey gun control embezzlement fake kidnapping, campbell v state baldwin county alabama utah supreme court crime of passion madison alabama state of arizona mobile alabama parole huntsville drug crimes abuse church robberies Shonda Walker, economic growth gun rights peyton pruitt serial minor offenses apprendi v new jersey mulga alabama Malone v State arson cullman alabama sexual assault adger alabama department of justice, pell city alabama netflix homicide underage drinking Pleasant Grove Alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix Walker County Alabama baltimore city circuit court Wesley Adam Whitworth warrior alabama breaking and entering pruitt v state Alabaster alabama Alonzo Ephraim shoplifting prostitution sting Tracie Todd beylund v north dakota huntsville alabama warrantless blood draws Briarwood Presbyterian Church hoax destructive devices death penalty, eugene lee jones v state stoves v state state of alabama lauderdale county alabama asia mcclain homicide rate self defense alabama criminal law roundup fraud shooting death illegal gun carry Kareem Dacar Gaymon burglary lethal injection criminal justice bessemer alabama implied consent editorial moore v texas lethal injection drugs judicial override death penalty Benn v State dekalb county alabama Easter john earle redfearn IV v state unlawful manufacturing social media theft of property bailey v us Neil Gorsuch court of criminal appeal releases alabama law enforcement agency heflin alabama ex parte briseno cherokee county alabama keith v state making a murderer home repair fraud gadsden alabama US Supreme Court Update eighth amendment, Adamsville alabama OJ Simpson texas hurst v florida 28 U.S.C. § 2254 maryland court of special appeals shelby county armed robbery department of justice criminal mischief boaz alabama shooting Mike Hubbard montgomery alabama clarence thomas Samuel Alito Sardis Alabama florence alabama morgan county alabama kimberly alabama mountain brook alabama William Pryor kenneth eugene billups endangerment of a child eleventh circuit ruling russell calhoun midazolam debtor prison springville alabama car accident calhoun county alabama fourth amendment capital offenses aiding and abetting executions West Alabama Hillary Clinton, greene county alabama operation crackdown CCA update the mannequin challenge eric sterling marion county birchfield v north dakota constitutional violations alabama Justice Sotomayor ring v arizona domestic violence hurst mandamus levins v state Etowah County Alabama, utah v strieff limestone county alabama abandonment fort payne alabama tuscaloosa alabama trussville alabama drug activity New York Times south carolina drug trafficking, Fentanyl anniston alabama, Guy Terrell Junior morris alabama rainbow city alabama adnan syed, pinson alabama npr kidnapping st clair county alabama street racing Gardendale Alabama capital murder towles v state illegal gambling Jefferson County Alabama Eutaw Alabama mike gilotti court systems, ferguson missouri birmingham alabama legende v state alfonso morris foley alabama Rule 32 betton v state Joshua Reese mount olive alabama SCOTUS, pelham alabama assault battles v state Woods v State public assistance fraud oneonta alabama bomb threat talladega superspeedway sheffield v state dothan alabama capital punishment operation bullseye brookside alabama Tommy Arthur forced isolation LWOP court of criminal appeals Xavier Beasley strickland v washington brendan dassey banville v state scotus identity theft mcwilliams v dunn constitutional law, blountsville alabama Thomas Hardiman dora alabama moving violations bernard v north dakota Lucky D Arcade sentencing law and policy blog summaries



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.