CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016

Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.

2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.


Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)

Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.

Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)

In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).


Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)


Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.


Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)

Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.


Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)


This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State


If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


marion county embezzlement capital murder birmingham alabama legende v state towles v state anniston alabama, fultondale alabama Thomas Hardiman brady v maryland pruitt v state street racing aiding and abetting trussville alabama lamar county alabama criminal law roundup debit card skimming scams springville alabama drug activity baltimore city circuit court executions Alonzo Ephraim fraudulent checks OJ Simpson adnan syed, Benn v State hall v florida hoax destructive devices tuscaloosa alabama Easter SCOTUS, stoves v state home repair fraud abuse kenneth eugene billups betton v state alabama supreme court burglary Stephen Breyer lethal injection heflin alabama Jefferson County Alabama asia mcclain drug trafficking, New York Times gun control mountain brook alabama smith v state underage drinking beylund v north dakota kidnapping brookside alabama mobile alabama LWOP capital punishment drug busts armed robbery fort payne alabama nicholas hawkins adger alabama campbell v state warrantless blood draws mcwilliams v dunn narcotics investigation edwards v arizona eugene lee jones v state keith v state avondale alabama shooting robberies dora alabama huntsville alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church second amendment forced isolation fraud fourth amendment mccalla alabama hurst v florida cherokee county alabama animal cruelty criminal mischief morgan county alabama foley alabama huntsville concealed carry § 13A-3-23 William Pryor felony assaults gadsden alabama birchfield v north dakota drug possession, Gardendale Alabama hoover alabama court of criminal appeals Tommy Arthur tarrant alabama unlawful manufacturing court of criminal appeal releases netflix Lucky D Arcade death penalty drug smuggling 2016 election, christian guitierez aziz sayyed sarah koenig russell calhoun abduction christmas shooting assault sentencing law and policy blog summaries utah supreme court constitutional violations Wesley Adam Whitworth lethal injection drugs mike gilotti dothan alabama Sardis Alabama ring v arizona talladega superspeedway public assistance fraud sheffield v state homicide state of alabama serial eighth amendment, cullman alabama habeas corpus relief murder ake v oklahoma Kareem Dacar Gaymon florence alabama madison alabama West Alabama Walker County Alabama levins v state shooting death brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix steve avery criminal justice reform, john earle redfearn IV v state shoplifting hurst mandamus benjamin todd acton midazolam crime of passion attempted murder fake kidnapping, ferguson missouri Etowah County Alabama, hanceville alabama department of justice, brian fredick lucas montgomery alabama parole church robberies Fentanyl dekalb county alabama boaz alabama Glaze v State mount olive alabama Eutaw Alabama prostitution sting department of justice editorial Shonda Walker, morris alabama sexual assault bailey v us car accident alabama law enforcement agency court systems, drug seizure bernard v north dakota identity theft US Supreme Court Update § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing warrior alabama endangerment of a child Tracie Todd domestic violence CCA update OJ Simpson Made in America Marengo County Alabama blount county alabama ex parte briseno Ingmire v State utah v strieff Rule 32 sixth amendment pinson alabama scotus death penalty, Dylann Roof strickland v washington npr brendan dassey maryland court of special appeals moving violations Neil Gorsuch theft Samuel Alito drug crimes mulga alabama apprendi v new jersey the mannequin challenge state of arizona minor offenses theft of property kimberly alabama moore v texas jerry bohannon domestic abuse calhoun county alabama alabama fairfield alabama, blountsville alabama economic growth Xavier Beasley illegal gambling implied consent illegal gun carry south carolina road rage arson Guy Terrell Junior Pleasant Grove Alabama social media banville v state Alabaster alabama baldwin county alabama Joshua Reese oneonta alabama breaking and entering pelham alabama self defense lauderdale county alabama criminal justice greene county alabama Woods v State Malone v State Adamsville alabama Kay Ivey eric sterling eleventh circuit ruling st clair county alabama Mike Hubbard capital offenses texas negligent homicide albertville alabama operation crackdown operation bullseye homicide rate Justice Sotomayor Donald Trump, clarence thomas abandonment gun rights alfonso morris nathan woods Hillary Clinton, rainbow city alabama decatur alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 terell corey mcmullin making a murderer bessemer alabama peyton pruitt debtor prison pell city alabama battles v state constitutional law, bomb threat heritage christian university limestone county alabama judicial override stanley brent chapman shelby county



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.