CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016

Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.

2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.


Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)

Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.

Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)

In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).


Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)


Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.


Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)

Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.


Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)


This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State


If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


criminal justice identity theft court of criminal appeal releases gun control lauderdale county alabama morris alabama operation bullseye hurst v florida crime of passion Easter lethal injection drugs npr foley alabama oneonta alabama adger alabama pruitt v state second amendment OJ Simpson Made in America burglary mulga alabama court of criminal appeals greene county alabama Justice Sotomayor Joshua Reese pinson alabama criminal mischief tuscaloosa alabama terell corey mcmullin netflix Pleasant Grove Alabama ferguson missouri utah supreme court sheffield v state birchfield v north dakota anniston alabama, alabama criminal law roundup prostitution sting st clair county alabama road rage legende v state Guy Terrell Junior bomb threat dora alabama cherokee county alabama sarah koenig beylund v north dakota nathan woods madison alabama public assistance fraud strickland v washington fourth amendment constitutional law, Donald Trump, brady v maryland blountsville alabama florence alabama Thomas Hardiman drug seizure Neil Gorsuch domestic abuse animal cruelty gadsden alabama drug smuggling texas illegal gambling Mike Hubbard morgan county alabama midazolam talladega superspeedway eleventh circuit ruling aiding and abetting mcwilliams v dunn fort payne alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth church robberies Shonda Walker, Jefferson County Alabama capital offenses 28 U.S.C. § 2254 baltimore city circuit court abduction parole Adamsville alabama eugene lee jones v state blount county alabama mobile alabama ex parte briseno lamar county Marengo County Alabama hall v florida christmas shooting murder 2016 election, forced isolation Dylann Roof smith v state Sardis Alabama felony assaults fultondale alabama narcotics investigation SCOTUS, Stephen Breyer boaz alabama adnan syed, Benn v State apprendi v new jersey baldwin county alabama warrior alabama endangerment of a child Glaze v State theft of property asia mcclain CCA update drug crimes eighth amendment, alabama supreme court economic growth negligent homicide drug busts clarence thomas russell calhoun towles v state Xavier Beasley unlawful manufacturing Gardendale Alabama death penalty, capital murder department of justice avondale alabama Lucky D Arcade banville v state alabama cullman alabama West Alabama Woods v State springville alabama street racing sexual assault US Supreme Court Update marion county keith v state criminal justice reform, habeas corpus relief drug possession, fraud homicide stoves v state mountain brook alabama decatur alabama hoover alabama levins v state alabama law enforcement agency bailey v us serial utah v strieff ring v arizona drug trafficking, § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing Malone v State maryland court of special appeals moving violations warrantless blood draws robberies betton v state moore v texas the mannequin challenge social media state of arizona William Pryor dothan alabama constitutional violations Briarwood Presbyterian Church Kareem Dacar Gaymon mount olive alabama armed robbery underage drinking christian guitierez Walker County Alabama implied consent shelby county OJ Simpson Alonzo Ephraim tarrant alabama editorial New York Times sixth amendment § 13A-3-23 aziz sayyed brian fredick lucas theft south carolina edwards v arizona abandonment death penalty judicial override heritage christian university trussville alabama huntsville Kay Ivey shoplifting benjamin todd acton bernard v north dakota state of alabama mccalla alabama huntsville alabama Hillary Clinton, bessemer alabama brookside alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix montgomery alabama department of justice, assault drug activity campbell v state kimberly alabama pelham alabama minor offenses birmingham alabama jerry bohannon Alabaster alabama car accident capital punishment fake kidnapping, john earle redfearn IV v state shooting death dekalb county alabama Ingmire v State gun rights eric sterling debtor prison sentencing law and policy blog summaries fraudulent checks Fentanyl Etowah County Alabama, steve avery scotus Eutaw Alabama domestic violence Tommy Arthur hoax destructive devices lethal injection calhoun county alabama making a murderer kenneth eugene billups battles v state pell city alabama breaking and entering abuse self defense mike gilotti home repair fraud alfonso morris executions Tracie Todd homicide rate kidnapping embezzlement fairfield alabama, operation crackdown nicholas hawkins shooting court systems, hurst mandamus stanley brent chapman brendan dassey LWOP arson heflin alabama ake v oklahoma limestone county alabama albertville alabama Samuel Alito hanceville alabama debit card skimming scams rainbow city alabama illegal gun carry Rule 32 peyton pruitt concealed carry attempted murder



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.