CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016


Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.

 


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.


2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.

 

Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)


Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.


Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)


In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).

 

Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)

 

Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.

 

Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)


Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.

 

Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)

 

This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

smith v state Stephen Breyer concealed carry § 13A-3-23 embezzlement Dylann Roof abuse Walker County Alabama battles v state tuscaloosa alabama abduction court systems, Xavier Beasley Hillary Clinton, bessemer alabama netflix warrior alabama narcotics investigation habeas corpus relief constitutional violations domestic abuse brady v maryland moore v texas unlawful manufacturing economic growth texas Briarwood Presbyterian Church fultondale alabama asia mcclain maryland court of special appeals gun rights ake v oklahoma homicide mobile alabama stoves v state Kareem Dacar Gaymon warrantless blood draws Sardis Alabama utah supreme court serial gadsden alabama marion county judicial override capital offenses lauderdale county alabama blount county alabama abandonment scotus drug smuggling fraudulent checks levins v state shoplifting ex parte briseno drug seizure morgan county alabama john earle redfearn IV v state shooting Joshua Reese npr birchfield v north dakota Kay Ivey keith v state department of justice, Fentanyl Shonda Walker, alabama law enforcement agency Guy Terrell Junior kidnapping identity theft alfonso morris prostitution sting underage drinking Etowah County Alabama, minor offenses madison alabama executions florence alabama beylund v north dakota kenneth eugene billups russell calhoun baldwin county alabama death penalty drug activity greene county alabama Woods v State sexual assault foley alabama ring v arizona cherokee county alabama self defense nicholas hawkins bernard v north dakota homicide rate parole car accident mcwilliams v dunn debit card skimming scams Samuel Alito CCA update OJ Simpson Made in America campbell v state sarah koenig Jefferson County Alabama stanley brent chapman boaz alabama social media apprendi v new jersey eleventh circuit ruling hurst v florida negligent homicide jerry bohannon pell city alabama Gardendale Alabama legende v state st clair county alabama brendan dassey dothan alabama Marengo County Alabama alabama supreme court drug busts towles v state SCOTUS, brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix eric sterling benjamin todd acton lethal injection drugs West Alabama birmingham alabama Justice Sotomayor adnan syed, Alonzo Ephraim New York Times state of arizona state of alabama theft arson anniston alabama, Malone v State illegal gambling eugene lee jones v state mountain brook alabama Eutaw Alabama mccalla alabama felony assaults Tommy Arthur betton v state tarrant alabama decatur alabama gun control sheffield v state bailey v us edwards v arizona debtor prison morris alabama hall v florida Pleasant Grove Alabama fake kidnapping, breaking and entering alabama criminal law roundup steve avery street racing domestic violence brian fredick lucas Thomas Hardiman Donald Trump, albertville alabama springville alabama drug possession, death penalty, terell corey mcmullin ferguson missouri fort payne alabama criminal justice reform, Alabaster alabama animal cruelty LWOP limestone county alabama Glaze v State murder criminal justice road rage OJ Simpson illegal gun carry home repair fraud assault oneonta alabama Neil Gorsuch lethal injection operation bullseye heritage christian university dora alabama rainbow city alabama William Pryor montgomery alabama calhoun county alabama church robberies burglary aiding and abetting dekalb county alabama talladega superspeedway Mike Hubbard Adamsville alabama forced isolation cullman alabama department of justice implied consent peyton pruitt 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Rule 32 Tracie Todd Lucky D Arcade drug crimes shooting death capital murder crime of passion avondale alabama court of criminal appeals drug trafficking, second amendment lamar county blountsville alabama nathan woods aziz sayyed operation crackdown christmas shooting clarence thomas strickland v washington 2016 election, court of criminal appeal releases robberies theft of property baltimore city circuit court sentencing law and policy blog summaries shelby county pinson alabama sixth amendment the mannequin challenge brookside alabama south carolina fourth amendment attempted murder US Supreme Court Update huntsville alabama heflin alabama adger alabama Benn v State banville v state endangerment of a child constitutional law, pruitt v state Ingmire v State hurst mandamus mike gilotti mount olive alabama making a murderer Wesley Adam Whitworth alabama huntsville kimberly alabama eighth amendment, bomb threat armed robbery capital punishment christian guitierez public assistance fraud moving violations Easter hoover alabama fraud utah v strieff fairfield alabama, criminal mischief pelham alabama editorial trussville alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing hanceville alabama midazolam hoax destructive devices mulga alabama

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.