CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016

Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.

2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.


Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)

Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.

Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)

In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).


Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)


Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.


Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)

Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.


Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)


This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State


If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


hoax destructive devices stoves v state shooting death avondale alabama burglary road rage steve avery lamar county drug activity editorial Marengo County Alabama blountsville alabama armed robbery Guy Terrell Junior hanceville alabama public assistance fraud murder Alabaster alabama death penalty alabama criminal law roundup constitutional law, baldwin county alabama scotus apprendi v new jersey Woods v State hoover alabama self defense serial fake kidnapping, rainbow city alabama identity theft implied consent embezzlement netflix ex parte briseno eleventh circuit ruling lauderdale county alabama Hillary Clinton, theft jerry bohannon shelby county robberies pruitt v state asia mcclain kimberly alabama lethal injection midazolam stanley brent chapman warrior alabama marion county mobile alabama ferguson missouri Samuel Alito economic growth morgan county alabama pell city alabama smith v state dothan alabama eugene lee jones v state banville v state sexual assault drug smuggling cullman alabama blount county alabama Sardis Alabama st clair county alabama utah v strieff Ingmire v State criminal mischief kidnapping home repair fraud Gardendale Alabama nicholas hawkins brookside alabama eighth amendment, § 13A-3-23 debit card skimming scams gun control pinson alabama alabama supreme court department of justice, debtor prison New York Times operation bullseye south carolina legende v state dora alabama brady v maryland Glaze v State russell calhoun church robberies Justice Sotomayor the mannequin challenge concealed carry calhoun county alabama Donald Trump, animal cruelty fourth amendment Fentanyl § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing Etowah County Alabama, Easter Stephen Breyer kenneth eugene billups OJ Simpson clarence thomas maryland court of special appeals sixth amendment tuscaloosa alabama narcotics investigation betton v state Eutaw Alabama unlawful manufacturing Tracie Todd mike gilotti mount olive alabama CCA update court systems, domestic violence Xavier Beasley Lucky D Arcade LWOP drug crimes Dylann Roof abuse William Pryor birmingham alabama john earle redfearn IV v state abandonment tarrant alabama nathan woods baltimore city circuit court street racing SCOTUS, lethal injection drugs hall v florida minor offenses mountain brook alabama 2016 election, springville alabama peyton pruitt alfonso morris Wesley Adam Whitworth Alonzo Ephraim adger alabama fultondale alabama bailey v us capital punishment cherokee county alabama greene county alabama parole texas mccalla alabama fairfield alabama, fort payne alabama beylund v north dakota Briarwood Presbyterian Church Adamsville alabama US Supreme Court Update alabama Rule 32 birchfield v north dakota Kareem Dacar Gaymon hurst v florida felony assaults npr homicide rate Shonda Walker, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 heflin alabama Joshua Reese drug possession, pelham alabama hurst mandamus attempted murder bessemer alabama bernard v north dakota eric sterling domestic abuse Malone v State underage drinking executions levins v state moving violations death penalty, brendan dassey campbell v state negligent homicide heritage christian university strickland v washington Pleasant Grove Alabama talladega superspeedway alabama law enforcement agency theft of property oneonta alabama christian guitierez huntsville alabama operation crackdown Jefferson County Alabama keith v state towles v state homicide Walker County Alabama making a murderer sentencing law and policy blog summaries shooting illegal gun carry state of alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix edwards v arizona limestone county alabama christmas shooting drug seizure trussville alabama ake v oklahoma court of criminal appeals mcwilliams v dunn Tommy Arthur gadsden alabama car accident forced isolation aziz sayyed abduction fraudulent checks department of justice morris alabama Benn v State bomb threat second amendment gun rights habeas corpus relief sarah koenig drug trafficking, boaz alabama court of criminal appeal releases florence alabama assault decatur alabama judicial override social media illegal gambling mulga alabama breaking and entering ring v arizona prostitution sting albertville alabama Kay Ivey aiding and abetting criminal justice reform, West Alabama Thomas Hardiman utah supreme court Neil Gorsuch dekalb county alabama battles v state fraud warrantless blood draws drug busts endangerment of a child sheffield v state capital murder adnan syed, foley alabama benjamin todd acton crime of passion moore v texas criminal justice constitutional violations Mike Hubbard state of arizona madison alabama arson huntsville OJ Simpson Made in America shoplifting terell corey mcmullin brian fredick lucas montgomery alabama capital offenses anniston alabama,



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.