CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016


Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.

 


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.


2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.

 

Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)


Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.


Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)


In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).

 

Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)

 

Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.

 

Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)


Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.

 

Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)

 

This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

alabama criminal law roundup home repair fraud drug possession, drug crimes dekalb county alabama Glaze v State tarrant alabama state of arizona gun rights lamar county russell calhoun shelby county baldwin county alabama birchfield v north dakota pruitt v state serial court of criminal appeals fraud mcwilliams v dunn avondale alabama capital offenses drug smuggling hall v florida 28 U.S.C. § 2254 kenneth eugene billups drug trafficking, parole blountsville alabama adger alabama Kay Ivey midazolam madison alabama narcotics investigation LWOP Mike Hubbard Rule 32 pinson alabama Xavier Beasley domestic violence fraudulent checks state of alabama underage drinking peyton pruitt Benn v State talladega superspeedway ex parte briseno death penalty moore v texas texas shooting death homicide rate eighth amendment, heritage christian university Ingmire v State SCOTUS, tuscaloosa alabama jerry bohannon cherokee county alabama alabama supreme court boaz alabama rainbow city alabama aziz sayyed asia mcclain attempted murder court systems, utah v strieff alabama law enforcement agency huntsville alabama Easter warrantless blood draws embezzlement constitutional law, breaking and entering sentencing law and policy blog summaries greene county alabama aiding and abetting nicholas hawkins Pleasant Grove Alabama criminal mischief homicide animal cruelty Neil Gorsuch pell city alabama alfonso morris West Alabama ake v oklahoma ring v arizona Woods v State capital murder executions hurst v florida prostitution sting fort payne alabama forced isolation 2016 election, brendan dassey operation bullseye dothan alabama beylund v north dakota Tracie Todd theft hurst mandamus bailey v us netflix cullman alabama benjamin todd acton scotus Malone v State bernard v north dakota public assistance fraud US Supreme Court Update OJ Simpson decatur alabama christian guitierez car accident murder Donald Trump, smith v state hoover alabama sarah koenig moving violations utah supreme court hoax destructive devices Alabaster alabama OJ Simpson Made in America Joshua Reese criminal justice criminal justice reform, edwards v arizona economic growth john earle redfearn IV v state department of justice, William Pryor blount county alabama social media assault Samuel Alito lethal injection mobile alabama legende v state Etowah County Alabama, Tommy Arthur bessemer alabama maryland court of special appeals fultondale alabama CCA update albertville alabama abduction nathan woods towles v state constitutional violations montgomery alabama death penalty, unlawful manufacturing birmingham alabama sexual assault operation crackdown making a murderer lethal injection drugs mike gilotti domestic abuse Hillary Clinton, brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix kimberly alabama illegal gambling editorial Walker County Alabama church robberies shooting eugene lee jones v state south carolina clarence thomas Wesley Adam Whitworth § 13A-3-23 sixth amendment Dylann Roof crime of passion Eutaw Alabama florence alabama Stephen Breyer judicial override Kareem Dacar Gaymon sheffield v state keith v state oneonta alabama identity theft Sardis Alabama Adamsville alabama strickland v washington road rage Gardendale Alabama marion county endangerment of a child npr alabama fairfield alabama, second amendment Shonda Walker, felony assaults levins v state Fentanyl abuse street racing Guy Terrell Junior trussville alabama gadsden alabama habeas corpus relief negligent homicide theft of property bomb threat burglary foley alabama battles v state heflin alabama court of criminal appeal releases betton v state morgan county alabama self defense st clair county alabama christmas shooting debit card skimming scams drug seizure hanceville alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church stanley brent chapman capital punishment implied consent department of justice abandonment calhoun county alabama mount olive alabama shoplifting brady v maryland brookside alabama limestone county alabama springville alabama Jefferson County Alabama banville v state eleventh circuit ruling warrior alabama New York Times robberies kidnapping armed robbery fake kidnapping, drug activity dora alabama concealed carry Justice Sotomayor brian fredick lucas eric sterling ferguson missouri adnan syed, stoves v state anniston alabama, baltimore city circuit court mountain brook alabama apprendi v new jersey Lucky D Arcade morris alabama Thomas Hardiman mccalla alabama gun control debtor prison arson minor offenses Marengo County Alabama fourth amendment steve avery drug busts terell corey mcmullin the mannequin challenge campbell v state § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing huntsville Alonzo Ephraim mulga alabama lauderdale county alabama illegal gun carry pelham alabama

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.