CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016

Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.

2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.


Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)

Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.

Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)

In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).


Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)


Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.


Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)

Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.


Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)


This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State


If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


madison alabama russell calhoun huntsville narcotics investigation legende v state morris alabama Dylann Roof mount olive alabama bernard v north dakota terell corey mcmullin mobile alabama Tommy Arthur adger alabama sixth amendment underage drinking stoves v state john earle redfearn IV v state eleventh circuit ruling robberies abuse church robberies lamar county Xavier Beasley Kareem Dacar Gaymon eugene lee jones v state Shonda Walker, Etowah County Alabama, alfonso morris court of criminal appeal releases texas Ingmire v State shooting Walker County Alabama springville alabama 2016 election, abandonment heritage christian university Gardendale Alabama parole Thomas Hardiman state of arizona fake kidnapping, illegal gambling second amendment christmas shooting Marengo County Alabama greene county alabama lethal injection homicide blount county alabama mccalla alabama cherokee county alabama Stephen Breyer Eutaw Alabama ferguson missouri warrior alabama morgan county alabama utah supreme court car accident npr ring v arizona st clair county alabama gadsden alabama hanceville alabama editorial birchfield v north dakota Mike Hubbard serial 28 U.S.C. § 2254 self defense homicide rate alabama criminal law roundup operation bullseye smith v state Woods v State OJ Simpson Made in America economic growth utah v strieff public assistance fraud hoover alabama domestic abuse West Alabama drug trafficking, strickland v washington Samuel Alito birmingham alabama mountain brook alabama hall v florida Fentanyl US Supreme Court Update street racing ex parte briseno eighth amendment, sheffield v state south carolina keith v state florence alabama maryland court of special appeals sarah koenig the mannequin challenge Lucky D Arcade Justice Sotomayor dora alabama fort payne alabama anniston alabama, endangerment of a child attempted murder betton v state home repair fraud levins v state constitutional law, sexual assault nicholas hawkins shoplifting constitutional violations Adamsville alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix calhoun county alabama judicial override brian fredick lucas negligent homicide court of criminal appeals warrantless blood draws fairfield alabama, hurst v florida battles v state mike gilotti aziz sayyed abduction theft hurst mandamus huntsville alabama pelham alabama limestone county alabama habeas corpus relief identity theft decatur alabama Guy Terrell Junior drug busts Joshua Reese court systems, capital punishment CCA update murder peyton pruitt animal cruelty operation crackdown nathan woods dothan alabama clarence thomas benjamin todd acton boaz alabama moving violations brendan dassey alabama implied consent hoax destructive devices criminal justice reform, towles v state lauderdale county alabama netflix assault Briarwood Presbyterian Church baltimore city circuit court unlawful manufacturing Alonzo Ephraim Neil Gorsuch debtor prison breaking and entering domestic violence mulga alabama pruitt v state death penalty, gun control state of alabama pell city alabama illegal gun carry lethal injection drugs § 13A-3-23 adnan syed, death penalty pinson alabama scotus armed robbery criminal mischief ake v oklahoma Hillary Clinton, road rage sentencing law and policy blog summaries foley alabama LWOP marion county mcwilliams v dunn stanley brent chapman SCOTUS, capital offenses kenneth eugene billups fultondale alabama drug activity blountsville alabama moore v texas making a murderer prostitution sting Easter oneonta alabama dekalb county alabama felony assaults arson shelby county avondale alabama executions burglary Wesley Adam Whitworth banville v state drug seizure montgomery alabama kimberly alabama bailey v us alabama supreme court debit card skimming scams kidnapping OJ Simpson brookside alabama rainbow city alabama aiding and abetting beylund v north dakota apprendi v new jersey brady v maryland baldwin county alabama Sardis Alabama fourth amendment § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing department of justice fraudulent checks Kay Ivey concealed carry albertville alabama bessemer alabama trussville alabama Benn v State christian guitierez capital murder eric sterling fraud talladega superspeedway drug possession, Jefferson County Alabama Alabaster alabama asia mcclain drug smuggling Pleasant Grove Alabama tuscaloosa alabama minor offenses cullman alabama New York Times Donald Trump, steve avery forced isolation William Pryor campbell v state gun rights heflin alabama embezzlement alabama law enforcement agency criminal justice jerry bohannon department of justice, crime of passion midazolam tarrant alabama Glaze v State Tracie Todd edwards v arizona theft of property bomb threat Rule 32 shooting death Malone v State drug crimes social media



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.