CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016

Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.

2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.


Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)

Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.

Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)

In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).


Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)


Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.


Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)

Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.


Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)


This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State


If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


Jefferson County Alabama stoves v state Eutaw Alabama identity theft domestic abuse mike gilotti parole blount county alabama mulga alabama bernard v north dakota shooting operation bullseye moore v texas peyton pruitt adger alabama court of criminal appeals texas serial embezzlement john earle redfearn IV v state arson capital murder fort payne alabama Malone v State self defense trussville alabama Alonzo Ephraim strickland v washington robberies fourth amendment making a murderer Stephen Breyer terell corey mcmullin crime of passion anniston alabama, pell city alabama nicholas hawkins Etowah County Alabama, marion county fultondale alabama prostitution sting midazolam judicial override kidnapping social media russell calhoun Fentanyl Tracie Todd Samuel Alito drug crimes heritage christian university bomb threat department of justice, alabama criminal law roundup Alabaster alabama OJ Simpson decatur alabama Easter campbell v state US Supreme Court Update scotus shelby county clarence thomas mobile alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing abandonment banville v state concealed carry dora alabama William Pryor Joshua Reese albertville alabama hurst mandamus home repair fraud alabama law enforcement agency pelham alabama narcotics investigation huntsville steve avery drug possession, utah supreme court legende v state springville alabama Hillary Clinton, Wesley Adam Whitworth homicide rate endangerment of a child dothan alabama Lucky D Arcade mountain brook alabama birchfield v north dakota Xavier Beasley underage drinking brady v maryland criminal justice reform, public assistance fraud bailey v us illegal gambling drug busts Briarwood Presbyterian Church christmas shooting assault christian guitierez car accident asia mcclain towles v state Dylann Roof Gardendale Alabama court of criminal appeal releases department of justice hurst v florida CCA update lauderdale county alabama adnan syed, sarah koenig fraudulent checks illegal gun carry constitutional violations theft Adamsville alabama sentencing law and policy blog summaries npr second amendment alfonso morris drug seizure tarrant alabama gadsden alabama attempted murder minor offenses Benn v State court systems, capital punishment death penalty apprendi v new jersey brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix utah v strieff Ingmire v State cullman alabama Mike Hubbard lethal injection drugs eighth amendment, moving violations oneonta alabama Neil Gorsuch Sardis Alabama kimberly alabama nathan woods sheffield v state lethal injection boaz alabama operation crackdown betton v state mount olive alabama maryland court of special appeals levins v state editorial lamar county rainbow city alabama executions debit card skimming scams mccalla alabama ring v arizona road rage smith v state felony assaults West Alabama gun control mcwilliams v dunn ake v oklahoma theft of property Justice Sotomayor unlawful manufacturing Kay Ivey abduction LWOP calhoun county alabama street racing forced isolation abuse morgan county alabama alabama keith v state morris alabama domestic violence edwards v arizona burglary breaking and entering fairfield alabama, Rule 32 SCOTUS, animal cruelty montgomery alabama aziz sayyed warrantless blood draws 2016 election, florence alabama constitutional law, armed robbery benjamin todd acton hanceville alabama drug activity Woods v State brendan dassey criminal justice fake kidnapping, Donald Trump, avondale alabama blountsville alabama kenneth eugene billups negligent homicide Kareem Dacar Gaymon sexual assault stanley brent chapman madison alabama Marengo County Alabama Guy Terrell Junior § 13A-3-23 birmingham alabama bessemer alabama Thomas Hardiman south carolina the mannequin challenge implied consent shoplifting debtor prison Tommy Arthur cherokee county alabama shooting death gun rights battles v state 28 U.S.C. § 2254 eugene lee jones v state Walker County Alabama Glaze v State economic growth church robberies fraud drug trafficking, pruitt v state OJ Simpson Made in America death penalty, baldwin county alabama tuscaloosa alabama alabama supreme court huntsville alabama warrior alabama heflin alabama greene county alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama criminal mischief murder netflix capital offenses talladega superspeedway hoover alabama hall v florida homicide drug smuggling baltimore city circuit court st clair county alabama dekalb county alabama hoax destructive devices Shonda Walker, brian fredick lucas eric sterling state of alabama habeas corpus relief foley alabama ex parte briseno limestone county alabama brookside alabama pinson alabama ferguson missouri aiding and abetting jerry bohannon sixth amendment state of arizona eleventh circuit ruling beylund v north dakota New York Times



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.