CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016

Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.

2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.


Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)

Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.

Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)

In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).


Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)


Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.


Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)

Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.


Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)


This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State


If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


dora alabama abuse strickland v washington gun control Walker County Alabama Glaze v State theft of property cherokee county alabama Alabaster alabama § 13A-3-23 stanley brent chapman netflix Lucky D Arcade morris alabama Guy Terrell Junior alabama supreme court breaking and entering heflin alabama scotus capital offenses clarence thomas warrantless blood draws aziz sayyed department of justice, gadsden alabama hurst mandamus mcwilliams v dunn morgan county alabama prostitution sting economic growth calhoun county alabama illegal gambling concealed carry drug possession, assault crime of passion 2016 election, montgomery alabama car accident pell city alabama CCA update gun rights alabama criminal law roundup hoax destructive devices adnan syed, brendan dassey Hillary Clinton, domestic abuse arson underage drinking foley alabama LWOP shelby county greene county alabama madison alabama drug smuggling shooting pruitt v state Fentanyl smith v state drug busts south carolina judicial override asia mcclain huntsville alabama utah supreme court banville v state hurst v florida abduction making a murderer battles v state capital murder steve avery eighth amendment, Neil Gorsuch serial abandonment tuscaloosa alabama sixth amendment adger alabama Shonda Walker, implied consent ake v oklahoma drug activity constitutional law, OJ Simpson Made in America keith v state ring v arizona Easter blountsville alabama debtor prison stoves v state lethal injection drugs habeas corpus relief OJ Simpson Benn v State Stephen Breyer peyton pruitt alabama utah v strieff homicide mobile alabama constitutional violations 28 U.S.C. § 2254 court systems, criminal mischief Woods v State dekalb county alabama Malone v State Xavier Beasley New York Times avondale alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth fraudulent checks illegal gun carry § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing kenneth eugene billups debit card skimming scams nicholas hawkins brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix eugene lee jones v state anniston alabama, benjamin todd acton nathan woods West Alabama christian guitierez Kay Ivey huntsville decatur alabama blount county alabama armed robbery negligent homicide birmingham alabama limestone county alabama sheffield v state kidnapping state of arizona mike gilotti criminal justice talladega superspeedway death penalty, cullman alabama bailey v us court of criminal appeals theft sexual assault levins v state social media the mannequin challenge drug crimes kimberly alabama pinson alabama rainbow city alabama moore v texas mccalla alabama minor offenses brady v maryland Mike Hubbard bernard v north dakota fourth amendment Ingmire v State beylund v north dakota terell corey mcmullin editorial identity theft hanceville alabama st clair county alabama sentencing law and policy blog summaries animal cruelty mount olive alabama US Supreme Court Update drug seizure self defense legende v state baldwin county alabama shooting death attempted murder birchfield v north dakota dothan alabama alfonso morris Marengo County Alabama second amendment sarah koenig forced isolation edwards v arizona William Pryor executions domestic violence baltimore city circuit court felony assaults npr Adamsville alabama church robberies robberies campbell v state SCOTUS, springville alabama betton v state parole shoplifting bomb threat fraud texas marion county court of criminal appeal releases brian fredick lucas florence alabama Tracie Todd fort payne alabama oneonta alabama fake kidnapping, eleventh circuit ruling Thomas Hardiman unlawful manufacturing albertville alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon russell calhoun Etowah County Alabama, drug trafficking, ferguson missouri lamar county lauderdale county alabama Samuel Alito jerry bohannon capital punishment Donald Trump, endangerment of a child christmas shooting Jefferson County Alabama trussville alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church ex parte briseno street racing aiding and abetting warrior alabama midazolam Joshua Reese department of justice homicide rate bessemer alabama Dylann Roof operation bullseye tarrant alabama burglary lethal injection maryland court of special appeals mulga alabama death penalty public assistance fraud john earle redfearn IV v state hall v florida embezzlement pelham alabama fairfield alabama, hoover alabama alabama law enforcement agency road rage Rule 32 eric sterling Alonzo Ephraim boaz alabama heritage christian university criminal justice reform, murder apprendi v new jersey Gardendale Alabama towles v state mountain brook alabama Sardis Alabama brookside alabama state of alabama Tommy Arthur fultondale alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama Eutaw Alabama narcotics investigation operation crackdown moving violations Justice Sotomayor home repair fraud



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.