CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016

Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.

2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.


Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)

Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.

Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)

In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).


Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)


Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.


Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)

Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.


Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)


This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State


If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


Rule 32 car accident lethal injection drugs utah v strieff keith v state Woods v State bailey v us Gardendale Alabama baltimore city circuit court executions birmingham alabama criminal justice trussville alabama brookside alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth criminal mischief tarrant alabama birchfield v north dakota hall v florida Jefferson County Alabama the mannequin challenge bernard v north dakota christmas shooting debtor prison editorial smith v state assault forced isolation mount olive alabama SCOTUS, William Pryor felony assaults home repair fraud 2016 election, ferguson missouri Samuel Alito brendan dassey Guy Terrell Junior aziz sayyed st clair county alabama parole Mike Hubbard stanley brent chapman greene county alabama battles v state Alabaster alabama theft fairfield alabama, beylund v north dakota kidnapping eugene lee jones v state abduction West Alabama anniston alabama, sexual assault alabama Tracie Todd moore v texas Benn v State § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing operation crackdown capital punishment homicide church robberies constitutional violations Neil Gorsuch dekalb county alabama Shonda Walker, mulga alabama asia mcclain fultondale alabama cullman alabama negligent homicide serial Ingmire v State hoover alabama Thomas Hardiman ake v oklahoma marion county fort payne alabama court of criminal appeal releases nathan woods Kareem Dacar Gaymon second amendment OJ Simpson bomb threat lethal injection warrantless blood draws public assistance fraud economic growth Lucky D Arcade Kay Ivey Malone v State drug trafficking, LWOP albertville alabama illegal gambling john earle redfearn IV v state bessemer alabama burglary mobile alabama arson shooting shoplifting christian guitierez pinson alabama homicide rate domestic violence midazolam Stephen Breyer drug crimes dora alabama moving violations sheffield v state CCA update alfonso morris making a murderer oneonta alabama rainbow city alabama sentencing law and policy blog summaries breaking and entering embezzlement foley alabama apprendi v new jersey adger alabama Glaze v State banville v state Alonzo Ephraim baldwin county alabama Fentanyl kenneth eugene billups abuse US Supreme Court Update constitutional law, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 judicial override drug smuggling fraud pell city alabama pelham alabama lamar county shelby county theft of property mountain brook alabama springville alabama campbell v state strickland v washington identity theft concealed carry levins v state edwards v arizona capital murder stoves v state implied consent eleventh circuit ruling gadsden alabama alabama supreme court drug busts Joshua Reese terell corey mcmullin shooting death montgomery alabama mcwilliams v dunn death penalty department of justice, § 13A-3-23 department of justice gun control pruitt v state Dylann Roof court systems, russell calhoun Eutaw Alabama peyton pruitt operation bullseye endangerment of a child self defense avondale alabama maryland court of special appeals texas netflix benjamin todd acton warrior alabama towles v state scotus court of criminal appeals Hillary Clinton, Tommy Arthur crime of passion morgan county alabama hurst v florida Briarwood Presbyterian Church narcotics investigation unlawful manufacturing clarence thomas legende v state fake kidnapping, ex parte briseno heritage christian university fraudulent checks abandonment drug activity limestone county alabama fourth amendment attempted murder cherokee county alabama brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix eric sterling drug possession, minor offenses road rage madison alabama Easter kimberly alabama morris alabama hoax destructive devices mike gilotti state of arizona npr utah supreme court brian fredick lucas gun rights brady v maryland huntsville alabama robberies decatur alabama jerry bohannon talladega superspeedway blountsville alabama betton v state heflin alabama steve avery sixth amendment Justice Sotomayor alabama criminal law roundup ring v arizona Xavier Beasley Walker County Alabama animal cruelty criminal justice reform, domestic abuse lauderdale county alabama nicholas hawkins boaz alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama debit card skimming scams sarah koenig huntsville tuscaloosa alabama Marengo County Alabama south carolina New York Times Adamsville alabama capital offenses aiding and abetting habeas corpus relief florence alabama dothan alabama eighth amendment, illegal gun carry underage drinking death penalty, state of alabama hurst mandamus prostitution sting social media calhoun county alabama murder adnan syed, Donald Trump, armed robbery mccalla alabama Sardis Alabama street racing drug seizure OJ Simpson Made in America hanceville alabama alabama law enforcement agency blount county alabama Etowah County Alabama,



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.