CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016

Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.

2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.


Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)

Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.

Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)

In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).


Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)


Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.


Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)

Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.


Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)


This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State


If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


armed robbery alabama foley alabama abduction ex parte briseno brady v maryland christian guitierez edwards v arizona mcwilliams v dunn Pleasant Grove Alabama OJ Simpson prostitution sting Thomas Hardiman Samuel Alito Sardis Alabama heritage christian university campbell v state unlawful manufacturing 28 U.S.C. § 2254 OJ Simpson Made in America aiding and abetting domestic violence US Supreme Court Update steve avery ferguson missouri robberies baldwin county alabama department of justice abandonment brendan dassey mobile alabama LWOP st clair county alabama Shonda Walker, brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix Gardendale Alabama Tommy Arthur smith v state mount olive alabama assault capital murder social media drug possession, keith v state crime of passion hurst v florida shooting texas sentencing law and policy blog summaries nicholas hawkins embezzlement sexual assault legende v state making a murderer Stephen Breyer eighth amendment, lethal injection drugs Malone v State Alabaster alabama debit card skimming scams boaz alabama anniston alabama, criminal justice capital offenses bailey v us Xavier Beasley felony assaults heflin alabama south carolina court of criminal appeal releases lauderdale county alabama Ingmire v State maryland court of special appeals § 13A-3-23 adnan syed, burglary Marengo County Alabama church robberies drug busts alabama criminal law roundup fultondale alabama alabama supreme court hoover alabama Glaze v State moore v texas sixth amendment operation bullseye hall v florida constitutional law, fourth amendment drug smuggling pruitt v state Mike Hubbard concealed carry forced isolation bomb threat murder second amendment Justice Sotomayor ring v arizona blount county alabama eleventh circuit ruling Hillary Clinton, peyton pruitt shooting death executions npr Woods v State mccalla alabama birmingham alabama dekalb county alabama benjamin todd acton drug seizure Eutaw Alabama dora alabama terell corey mcmullin endangerment of a child underage drinking mike gilotti shelby county madison alabama blountsville alabama Lucky D Arcade public assistance fraud bessemer alabama gun control mountain brook alabama identity theft calhoun county alabama eugene lee jones v state moving violations midazolam battles v state cherokee county alabama russell calhoun morgan county alabama dothan alabama gadsden alabama aziz sayyed narcotics investigation mulga alabama home repair fraud florence alabama the mannequin challenge hurst mandamus car accident fake kidnapping, homicide fairfield alabama, utah supreme court beylund v north dakota stanley brent chapman West Alabama § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing clarence thomas judicial override nathan woods Dylann Roof abuse breaking and entering alfonso morris montgomery alabama illegal gun carry court of criminal appeals bernard v north dakota capital punishment lethal injection strickland v washington department of justice, ake v oklahoma decatur alabama Benn v State New York Times drug crimes road rage banville v state trussville alabama self defense limestone county alabama drug trafficking, john earle redfearn IV v state apprendi v new jersey operation crackdown adger alabama sarah koenig brian fredick lucas asia mcclain theft of property William Pryor eric sterling morris alabama avondale alabama Alonzo Ephraim street racing oneonta alabama Easter serial drug activity homicide rate pinson alabama albertville alabama habeas corpus relief Adamsville alabama animal cruelty shoplifting Rule 32 economic growth stoves v state huntsville alabama jerry bohannon hoax destructive devices Jefferson County Alabama talladega superspeedway baltimore city circuit court lamar county Neil Gorsuch utah v strieff tarrant alabama SCOTUS, tuscaloosa alabama Donald Trump, springville alabama Guy Terrell Junior state of alabama cullman alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth parole greene county alabama Briarwood Presbyterian Church pell city alabama marion county Kareem Dacar Gaymon CCA update Tracie Todd levins v state domestic abuse fraudulent checks Etowah County Alabama, christmas shooting kimberly alabama gun rights alabama law enforcement agency Kay Ivey constitutional violations rainbow city alabama scotus Walker County Alabama pelham alabama hanceville alabama editorial attempted murder death penalty, sheffield v state fraud huntsville criminal justice reform, criminal mischief kidnapping netflix implied consent warrior alabama Joshua Reese birchfield v north dakota debtor prison 2016 election, minor offenses theft arson Fentanyl illegal gambling state of arizona court systems, towles v state brookside alabama negligent homicide betton v state kenneth eugene billups warrantless blood draws fort payne alabama death penalty



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.