CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016

Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.

2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.


Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)

Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.

Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)

In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).


Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)


Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.


Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)

Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.


Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)


This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State


If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


kenneth eugene billups maryland court of special appeals bailey v us limestone county alabama gun rights murder asia mcclain mulga alabama burglary road rage Briarwood Presbyterian Church Lucky D Arcade morgan county alabama fultondale alabama illegal gambling SCOTUS, alfonso morris drug smuggling concealed carry drug busts Jefferson County Alabama arson court of criminal appeals strickland v washington robberies brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix criminal justice reform, court systems, scotus morris alabama keith v state st clair county alabama lethal injection marion county fort payne alabama debtor prison alabama law enforcement agency shooting death ex parte briseno sexual assault pelham alabama montgomery alabama criminal justice christian guitierez pell city alabama department of justice Etowah County Alabama, towles v state Marengo County Alabama jerry bohannon oneonta alabama springville alabama dora alabama 2016 election, tuscaloosa alabama Justice Sotomayor New York Times hurst v florida judicial override kidnapping forced isolation capital offenses peyton pruitt utah supreme court rainbow city alabama theft of property terell corey mcmullin pinson alabama baltimore city circuit court stanley brent chapman hall v florida homicide bomb threat brookside alabama john earle redfearn IV v state fraud mike gilotti albertville alabama tarrant alabama serial home repair fraud US Supreme Court Update Adamsville alabama christmas shooting greene county alabama Tommy Arthur sheffield v state gun control LWOP CCA update huntsville hoover alabama adger alabama capital punishment sarah koenig sixth amendment death penalty, Alonzo Ephraim Alabaster alabama Walker County Alabama hoax destructive devices Samuel Alito Kay Ivey eighth amendment, court of criminal appeal releases eleventh circuit ruling animal cruelty West Alabama OJ Simpson Made in America illegal gun carry theft domestic abuse Shonda Walker, attempted murder drug trafficking, sentencing law and policy blog summaries self defense kimberly alabama npr stoves v state fake kidnapping, habeas corpus relief trussville alabama Guy Terrell Junior economic growth aiding and abetting steve avery hurst mandamus eric sterling debit card skimming scams hanceville alabama benjamin todd acton banville v state south carolina warrior alabama bessemer alabama anniston alabama, parole OJ Simpson mcwilliams v dunn mountain brook alabama legende v state Wesley Adam Whitworth car accident netflix cullman alabama abduction Ingmire v State Neil Gorsuch Tracie Todd huntsville alabama russell calhoun utah v strieff heflin alabama levins v state death penalty ake v oklahoma edwards v arizona betton v state decatur alabama moore v texas cherokee county alabama bernard v north dakota unlawful manufacturing prostitution sting social media campbell v state lamar county operation bullseye midazolam embezzlement talladega superspeedway alabama criminal law roundup crime of passion battles v state Eutaw Alabama dothan alabama operation crackdown executions adnan syed, mobile alabama mccalla alabama fairfield alabama, constitutional law, lauderdale county alabama smith v state endangerment of a child homicide rate church robberies breaking and entering state of alabama Stephen Breyer Benn v State state of arizona shooting shoplifting alabama supreme court § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing Rule 32 Donald Trump, beylund v north dakota criminal mischief fourth amendment public assistance fraud apprendi v new jersey department of justice, birmingham alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 fraudulent checks abandonment § 13A-3-23 implied consent Malone v State nicholas hawkins heritage christian university eugene lee jones v state Easter negligent homicide capital murder making a murderer editorial ferguson missouri calhoun county alabama mount olive alabama Hillary Clinton, gadsden alabama florence alabama texas ring v arizona Sardis Alabama blount county alabama Fentanyl armed robbery drug seizure nathan woods alabama brady v maryland pruitt v state Woods v State drug crimes dekalb county alabama Pleasant Grove Alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon William Pryor boaz alabama birchfield v north dakota identity theft Xavier Beasley brian fredick lucas minor offenses Dylann Roof madison alabama street racing second amendment Mike Hubbard clarence thomas moving violations narcotics investigation Thomas Hardiman aziz sayyed the mannequin challenge Joshua Reese foley alabama lethal injection drugs drug possession, felony assaults baldwin county alabama avondale alabama brendan dassey blountsville alabama Gardendale Alabama warrantless blood draws underage drinking abuse assault shelby county Glaze v State domestic violence constitutional violations drug activity



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.