CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo

AfterTheTrial.com... Because There’s Hope After the Trial

BLOG

After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016


Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.

 


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.


2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.

 

Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)


Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.


Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)


In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).

 

Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)

 

Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.

 

Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)


Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.

 

Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)

 

This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State

 

If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.


 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

shelby county bessemer alabama SCOTUS, Fentanyl utah supreme court south carolina trussville alabama Sardis Alabama limestone county alabama heflin alabama smith v state adger alabama alabama law enforcement agency theft of property brady v maryland capital punishment criminal mischief edwards v arizona fultondale alabama gun rights Jefferson County Alabama lethal injection springville alabama fort payne alabama minor offenses benjamin todd acton underage drinking brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix operation crackdown negligent homicide Dylann Roof banville v state shooting death parole West Alabama Benn v State baldwin county alabama warrantless blood draws moore v texas Lucky D Arcade hurst v florida legende v state st clair county alabama illegal gambling utah v strieff Stephen Breyer pinson alabama bomb threat john earle redfearn IV v state homicide criminal justice sheffield v state OJ Simpson Made in America Kareem Dacar Gaymon Briarwood Presbyterian Church nathan woods street racing eleventh circuit ruling church robberies forced isolation hurst mandamus bailey v us npr self defense mike gilotti death penalty tuscaloosa alabama rainbow city alabama department of justice mulga alabama anniston alabama, economic growth boaz alabama mobile alabama Joshua Reese talladega superspeedway baltimore city circuit court russell calhoun sentencing law and policy blog summaries § 13A-3-23 Samuel Alito Malone v State peyton pruitt judicial override clarence thomas calhoun county alabama cullman alabama fake kidnapping, dekalb county alabama Thomas Hardiman brendan dassey alfonso morris drug activity New York Times crime of passion heritage christian university Shonda Walker, ex parte briseno ferguson missouri netflix asia mcclain blount county alabama cherokee county alabama court of criminal appeal releases drug smuggling kenneth eugene billups alabama habeas corpus relief breaking and entering aziz sayyed Ingmire v State Pleasant Grove Alabama executions marion county OJ Simpson mountain brook alabama William Pryor stoves v state debit card skimming scams fraudulent checks prostitution sting moving violations Tracie Todd scotus avondale alabama death penalty, murder second amendment drug busts criminal justice reform, abduction kimberly alabama decatur alabama Donald Trump, midazolam betton v state Gardendale Alabama identity theft beylund v north dakota drug trafficking, tarrant alabama hoax destructive devices concealed carry the mannequin challenge madison alabama endangerment of a child strickland v washington jerry bohannon domestic abuse unlawful manufacturing sarah koenig drug seizure attempted murder texas albertville alabama keith v state operation bullseye Guy Terrell Junior fraud arson Tommy Arthur public assistance fraud Wesley Adam Whitworth Glaze v State assault Mike Hubbard brian fredick lucas illegal gun carry morgan county alabama birmingham alabama towles v state theft campbell v state hanceville alabama Adamsville alabama embezzlement Hillary Clinton, Kay Ivey steve avery drug crimes blountsville alabama state of alabama burglary morris alabama lethal injection drugs shooting birchfield v north dakota terell corey mcmullin pruitt v state constitutional violations drug possession, road rage sexual assault dothan alabama US Supreme Court Update making a murderer Etowah County Alabama, eighth amendment, foley alabama Justice Sotomayor Alonzo Ephraim pell city alabama levins v state lauderdale county alabama Woods v State ake v oklahoma dora alabama Xavier Beasley brookside alabama Marengo County Alabama department of justice, alabama criminal law roundup Rule 32 mcwilliams v dunn car accident sixth amendment mccalla alabama aiding and abetting hall v florida § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing mount olive alabama CCA update florence alabama serial court systems, alabama supreme court capital murder narcotics investigation Eutaw Alabama fairfield alabama, Walker County Alabama gun control shoplifting maryland court of special appeals debtor prison robberies abuse huntsville Easter bernard v north dakota social media warrior alabama homicide rate fourth amendment 2016 election, greene county alabama battles v state christmas shooting hoover alabama home repair fraud lamar county domestic violence implied consent eric sterling ring v arizona gadsden alabama huntsville alabama LWOP nicholas hawkins oneonta alabama 28 U.S.C. § 2254 stanley brent chapman montgomery alabama state of arizona felony assaults eugene lee jones v state pelham alabama animal cruelty adnan syed, Alabaster alabama court of criminal appeals capital offenses kidnapping apprendi v new jersey christian guitierez Neil Gorsuch armed robbery constitutional law, editorial abandonment

Archive

DISCLAIMER

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |

 

As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.