CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.

CCA Caselaw Update - June 2016

J.D. Lloyd - Friday, June 03, 2016

Malone v. State (CR-14-1326)

Malone was charged with second-degree assault and moved before trial for an immunity hearing under § 13A-3-23(d). During the incident in question, Malone stabbed the other party after the other person grabbed Malone by the throat, Malone left, and the other person caught up to Malone and grabbed him by the throat again. Malone’s self-defense claim wasn’t based upon a Stand-Your-Ground defense. The circuit court denied his request on the grounds that it did not have the authority to decide the question of immunity at a pretrial hearing. REVERSED. This case appears to be a pretty formative decision in the area of self-defense and the on-going interpretation of the 2006 amendment. The Court resolved two pretty big questions in favor of defendants.


1. Using deadly force is permissible under § 13A-3-23 outside of the stand-your-ground situations discussed in § 13A-3-23(b). One of the questions presented here was whether the 2006 Stand-Your-Ground amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) limited the use of deadly force in self defense to only those situations covered by the amendment to § 13A-3-23(b) -- where (a) a defendant is in a place he/she has a right to be and (b) isn’t involved in unlawful activity. Effectively, the State argued that if your situation didn’t follow under this dynamic -- i.e., like Malone’s -- the use of deadly physical force is not permitted. On the other hand, Malone argued that the common-law duty to retreat still applied in situations not covered by § 13A-3-23(b). The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, holding that the amendment didn’t abrogated the common law duty to retreat before using deadly physical force -- the amendment just gave another justification for using deadly physical force.

2. A § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing is not limited to only Stand-Your-Ground situations but rather any circumstance in which someone is possibly justified in using self defense. Again, the State tried to read the 2006 amendment in a narrow manner that simply isn’t justified by the plain wording of the statute. As such, the CCA held that an immunity hearing is authorized under § 13A-3-23(d) to adjudicate any self-defense claim, not just stand-your-ground claims.


Woods v. State (CR-14-0845)

Woods pleaded guilty to DUI in the Montgomery District Court and appealed for a trial de novo in the circuit court. During the circuit court trial, the State introduced over Woods’ objection a redacted copy of his guilty-plea conviction in the district court. On appeal, Woods argued that the guilty-plea shouldn’t have been allowed in a trial de novo; however, the State argued that under Phillips v. City of Dothan, 534 So. 3d 381 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988), the plea was admissible. REVERSED. The CCA decided that Phillips doesn’t comport with the idea that a trial de novo “wipes the slate clean” relying on language in Yarbrough v. City of Birmingham, 535 So. 2d 75 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977) and Ex parte Sorsby, 12 So .3d 139 (Ala. 2007). As such, the Court overruled Phillips and held that the admission of the guilty plea was reversible error.

Smith v. State (CR-97-1258)

In a death case that saw numerous remands and orders new sentencing hearings for a myriad of reasons, the circuit court held a fourth penalty-phase hearing wherein it excluded the public during the jury selection phase of the proceeding over the defense’s objection. The circuit court offered a generic justification regarding the small size of the courtroom to support its decision. The jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2 and the court followed that recommendation. REVERSED The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, finding that the circuit court failed to show how closing the courtroom was justified under Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).


Ingmire v. State (CR-14-1447)


Ingmire was charged and convicted of one count second-degree theft and one count receiving stolen property in connection to the theft/sale of a four-wheeler. At trial, the circuit court allowed the State to introduce a NCIC report where the four-wheeler was listed as stolen. The defense objected. REVERSED . Here, the CCA held that the NCIC report was hearsay and was not, in this trial, show to be a business record and worthy of exception under Rule 803(6) because there was no evidence that the report fit within the business-records exception. The Court left open the possibility that NCIC reports could one day be held to fit within the exception, but such a showing was not made in the trial below.


Benn v. State (CR-14-0714)

Benn was convicted of seven counts of capital murder and the jury recommended death by a vote of 10-2. On December 12, 2014, the circuit court held a judicial-sentencing hearing and took the arguments under advisement. On January 29, 2015, the court issued a written sentencing order sentencing Benn to death. On appeal, Benn argued that the CCA lacked jurisdiction to consider this matter because the circuit court failed to enter a judgment of conviction as required by law. APPEAL DISMISSED. Relying on the AL SC’s recent decision in Ex parte Kelley, [Ms.  1131451] (Ala. 2015) and § 12-22-130, the CCA held that trial court must pronounce in open court both an adjudication of guilt and sentence.


Glaze v. State (CR-15-0553)


This was a DUI case involving a municipality wherein the appeal was dismissed for the same reason in Benn v. State


If you or someone you know has been convicted of wrongful criminal charges, there is hope after the trial. Contact us today by clicking HERE.



Recent Posts


drug seizure maryland court of special appeals murder alabama Kareem Dacar Gaymon aziz sayyed state of arizona mike gilotti morris alabama tarrant alabama Wesley Adam Whitworth identity theft john earle redfearn IV v state avondale alabama keith v state capital offenses Benn v State West Alabama stanley brent chapman social media Guy Terrell Junior baltimore city circuit court death penalty, church robberies unlawful manufacturing dora alabama alabama law enforcement agency concealed carry eugene lee jones v state OJ Simpson banville v state LWOP abandonment pruitt v state kenneth eugene billups sheffield v state nathan woods the mannequin challenge texas lethal injection drugs Marengo County Alabama CCA update pinson alabama fake kidnapping, sexual assault economic growth south carolina birmingham alabama 2016 election, moving violations street racing ring v arizona endangerment of a child Walker County Alabama huntsville alabama Samuel Alito Pleasant Grove Alabama pell city alabama utah supreme court mobile alabama fraud eric sterling court of criminal appeals scotus npr hoax destructive devices morgan county alabama illegal gambling Easter shooting death New York Times Hillary Clinton, Tommy Arthur Fentanyl abuse Mike Hubbard debtor prison Neil Gorsuch § 13A-3-23 madison alabama steve avery oneonta alabama hoover alabama court of criminal appeal releases sentencing law and policy blog summaries lauderdale county alabama ake v oklahoma editorial Thomas Hardiman embezzlement cullman alabama homicide rate Alonzo Ephraim Justice Sotomayor US Supreme Court Update underage drinking warrior alabama court systems, aiding and abetting capital punishment brady v maryland prostitution sting drug smuggling capital murder brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix terell corey mcmullin netflix mcwilliams v dunn death penalty negligent homicide benjamin todd acton state of alabama sarah koenig Stephen Breyer constitutional violations gun control Eutaw Alabama William Pryor warrantless blood draws operation bullseye alabama criminal law roundup parole Lucky D Arcade adnan syed, habeas corpus relief lethal injection Etowah County Alabama, Xavier Beasley Woods v State hurst mandamus brendan dassey clarence thomas Tracie Todd florence alabama car accident pelham alabama domestic abuse homicide Shonda Walker, making a murderer trussville alabama hanceville alabama crime of passion Ingmire v State judicial override public assistance fraud attempted murder criminal justice reform, talladega superspeedway nicholas hawkins towles v state Glaze v State stoves v state moore v texas fort payne alabama dothan alabama apprendi v new jersey implied consent Briarwood Presbyterian Church criminal mischief bomb threat eighth amendment, mccalla alabama eleventh circuit ruling mountain brook alabama huntsville fraudulent checks minor offenses abduction Kay Ivey jerry bohannon adger alabama cherokee county alabama department of justice debit card skimming scams russell calhoun fourth amendment limestone county alabama fultondale alabama bernard v north dakota montgomery alabama assault kimberly alabama operation crackdown shoplifting bessemer alabama gadsden alabama felony assaults Alabaster alabama christmas shooting self defense Donald Trump, forced isolation robberies home repair fraud drug activity brookside alabama domestic violence arson § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing theft of property rainbow city alabama birchfield v north dakota illegal gun carry 28 U.S.C. § 2254 kidnapping mulga alabama betton v state smith v state heflin alabama sixth amendment legende v state Dylann Roof foley alabama ex parte briseno shelby county constitutional law, boaz alabama Adamsville alabama serial armed robbery heritage christian university Rule 32 greene county alabama Jefferson County Alabama baldwin county alabama levins v state hall v florida lamar county alfonso morris decatur alabama christian guitierez theft drug crimes Gardendale Alabama OJ Simpson Made in America department of justice, executions strickland v washington narcotics investigation asia mcclain second amendment gun rights tuscaloosa alabama dekalb county alabama bailey v us road rage burglary Malone v State Joshua Reese fairfield alabama, midazolam breaking and entering alabama supreme court drug busts shooting drug trafficking, Sardis Alabama utah v strieff hurst v florida drug possession, peyton pruitt albertville alabama edwards v arizona anniston alabama, beylund v north dakota blount county alabama battles v state calhoun county alabama SCOTUS, ferguson missouri springville alabama blountsville alabama criminal justice brian fredick lucas marion county st clair county alabama campbell v state animal cruelty mount olive alabama



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.