CALL 205.538.3340

The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd Logo Because There’s Hope After the Trial


After The Trial Blog

The After The Trial blog presents insights on ongoing and recent trials around the state of Alabama, including weekly criminal law round-ups.


J.D. Lloyd - Saturday, July 25, 2015

Lethal Injection — Glossip v. Gross

J.D. Lloyd - Saturday, July 25, 2015



Oklahoma, like most states, uses a three-drug cocktail during its lethal injection procedure. The first drug induces unconsciousness. Until the manufacturer discontinued production, the drug used for this stage was a barbiturate, sodium thiopental or pentobarbital. The second drug is a paralytic that disables all muscular movements. The third drug stops the defendant’s heart.

Due to the manufacturer discontinuing production of the barbiturate used in the first stage of the execution protocol, Oklahoma adopted the used of midazolam, a strong sedative, for the first stage of the execution process. Oklahoma death-row inmates filed a challenge to the use of midazolam under 42 USC § 1983. Specifically, petitioners argued that the use of this drug would violate the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel or unusual punishment because this drug will not sufficiently sedate the inmates so they will not feel pain in the execution process.

The district court denied relief on two grounds: (1) the petitioners failed to identify an alternative method of execution that presented a substantially less severe risk of pain; and (2) the petitioners failed to demonstrate the use of midazolam created a risk of severe pain. The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s decision.


In rejecting the inmates’ claim that the use of midazolam violates the Eighth Amendment, the Court reached two conclusions: (1) the drug does not create a substantial risk of severe pain; and (2) the petitioners failed to show a “known and reliable” alternative that presents a lower risk of pain.

1. The inmates failed to establish the use of midazolam creates a substantial risk of severe pain.

In Baze v. Rees, 553 U.S. 35 (2008), another case challenging the constitutionality of the three-drug cocktail used in lethal injections, the Court held that in any Eighth Amendment challenges to an execution protocol, a challenger must show the method employed will create the great risk of causing pain. Here, the Court found that inmates completely failed to meet that showing. The Court concluded that ample evidence was presented that midazolam did not create a risk of severe pain necessary to grant the inmate’s request for a permanent injunction.

2. Petitioners failed to identify a “known and available alternative” to the execution methods that would have lower risks of pain

Baze also requires a challenger to show that the risk of harm was substantial in comparison to a known and available alternative method of execution. Here, the Court found the inmates failed to satisfy this requirement of Baze. While the inmates argued that Oklahoma could use sodium thiopental or pentobarbital as the first drug in the three-drug cocktail, the Court rejected this argument because it was all but conceded that these drugs were no longer available to the States.

Dissent — Justice Breyer no longer believes the death penalty is constitutional.

Justice Breyer authored a thoughtful dissent where he calls into question the constitutionality of the death penalty. He focused his criticism on three main points: (1) his belief that the process suffers from “serious unreliability;” (2) that the ultimate penalty is arbitrarily applied; and (3) that the long delays in sentencing and execution undermine the penological purpose of the penalty.

The opinion is available here:

Recent Posts


Kareem Dacar Gaymon moore v texas sexual assault Mike Hubbard benjamin todd acton court of criminal appeal releases constitutional law, eighth amendment, Kay Ivey blount county alabama mcwilliams v dunn fairfield alabama, marion county § 13A-3-23(d) immunity hearing maryland court of special appeals asia mcclain burglary Justice Sotomayor negligent homicide brendan dassey, steve avery, making a murderer, scotus, netflix ring v arizona hoover alabama gun rights 2016 election, New York Times peyton pruitt madison alabama home repair fraud drug possession, West Alabama dora alabama fultondale alabama springville alabama brendan dassey limestone county alabama Gardendale Alabama executions gadsden alabama lamar county aiding and abetting boaz alabama shooting birmingham alabama domestic violence tuscaloosa alabama kenneth eugene billups mountain brook alabama talladega superspeedway department of justice criminal mischief mobile alabama judicial override shoplifting sarah koenig fraud Hillary Clinton, eugene lee jones v state church robberies murder Ingmire v State blountsville alabama john earle redfearn IV v state cullman alabama abduction Guy Terrell Junior nathan woods theft stanley brent chapman operation bullseye campbell v state Rule 32 lauderdale county alabama towles v state identity theft mccalla alabama lethal injection parole constitutional violations minor offenses alabama law enforcement agency habeas corpus relief mulga alabama Etowah County Alabama, drug smuggling alabama supreme court avondale alabama Alabaster alabama Glaze v State criminal justice russell calhoun heflin alabama assault capital punishment tarrant alabama concealed carry endangerment of a child brookside alabama pelham alabama Shonda Walker, Alonzo Ephraim Jefferson County Alabama adnan syed, Tracie Todd animal cruelty homicide shelby county crime of passion apprendi v new jersey Stephen Breyer midazolam illegal gambling warrior alabama shooting death Marengo County Alabama rainbow city alabama utah supreme court fourth amendment bernard v north dakota ake v oklahoma drug seizure capital murder gun control OJ Simpson economic growth fake kidnapping, npr 28 U.S.C. § 2254 aziz sayyed calhoun county alabama embezzlement Dylann Roof edwards v arizona ferguson missouri street racing road rage morris alabama hanceville alabama robberies bomb threat death penalty terell corey mcmullin keith v state making a murderer public assistance fraud pell city alabama car accident battles v state Lucky D Arcade st clair county alabama levins v state south carolina capital offenses CCA update moving violations warrantless blood draws LWOP homicide rate hurst v florida Fentanyl Sardis Alabama lethal injection drugs domestic abuse decatur alabama bessemer alabama unlawful manufacturing US Supreme Court Update felony assaults forced isolation pruitt v state sheffield v state brady v maryland greene county alabama Neil Gorsuch court systems, hoax destructive devices albertville alabama steve avery jerry bohannon eric sterling armed robbery Samuel Alito oneonta alabama Easter christian guitierez sentencing law and policy blog summaries William Pryor § 13A-3-23 death penalty, drug busts Eutaw Alabama legende v state christmas shooting fort payne alabama Benn v State hall v florida fraudulent checks Pleasant Grove Alabama OJ Simpson Made in America beylund v north dakota narcotics investigation Joshua Reese betton v state dekalb county alabama trussville alabama netflix baltimore city circuit court drug activity stoves v state mount olive alabama state of alabama dothan alabama anniston alabama, drug crimes prostitution sting theft of property underage drinking Thomas Hardiman Wesley Adam Whitworth sixth amendment debtor prison breaking and entering the mannequin challenge adger alabama kimberly alabama drug trafficking, ex parte briseno serial attempted murder montgomery alabama abandonment Xavier Beasley texas morgan county alabama court of criminal appeals arson scotus foley alabama mike gilotti social media heritage christian university eleventh circuit ruling birchfield v north dakota operation crackdown baldwin county alabama second amendment smith v state kidnapping cherokee county alabama brian fredick lucas alabama Woods v State bailey v us huntsville alabama banville v state pinson alabama nicholas hawkins alfonso morris criminal justice reform, abuse Walker County Alabama hurst mandamus state of arizona Malone v State Tommy Arthur debit card skimming scams florence alabama editorial implied consent self defense Donald Trump, Briarwood Presbyterian Church SCOTUS, department of justice, utah v strieff Adamsville alabama strickland v washington illegal gun carry alabama criminal law roundup clarence thomas huntsville



These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among  other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Get Free Legal Advice  Contact us for a complimentary legal consultation

I am interested in scheduling a free legal consultation and receiving additional information.

Submitting Form...

The server encountered an error.

Thank you, your  entry has been  received.

© 2017 The Law Office of J.D. Lloyd, LLC. All Rights Reserved. |


As required by Rule 7.2(e), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.